Office of Thrift Supervision

Last updated

Office of Thrift Supervision
US-OfficeOfThriftSupervision-Seal.svg
Agency overview
Formed9 August 1989
Preceding agency
Dissolved21 July 2011
Superseding agency
Headquarters Washington, D.C.
Employees1024 (2007)
Annual budget US$250 million (2008)
Agency executive
Parent agency Department of the Treasury
Website http://www.ots.treas.gov/

The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) was a United States federal agency under the Department of the Treasury that chartered, supervised, and regulated all federally chartered and state-chartered savings banks and savings and loans associations. It was created in 1989 as a renamed version of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, another federal agency (that was faulted for its role in the savings and loan crisis). Like other U.S. federal bank regulators, it was paid by the banks it regulated. The OTS was initially seen as an aggressive regulator, but was later lax. Declining revenues and staff led the OTS to market itself to companies as a lax regulator in order to get revenue.

Contents

The OTS also expanded its oversight to companies that were not banks. Some of the companies that failed under OTS supervision during the financial crisis of 2007–2010 include American International Group (AIG), Washington Mutual, and IndyMac.

The OTS was implicated in a backdating scandal regarding the balance sheet of IndyMac. Section 312 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act dissolved the OTS, transferring its functions to other agencies.

Funding

OTS did not receive a government budget; instead, they were funded by the banks they regulate, like other U.S. federal bank regulators. [1] Other regulatory agencies like the OTS include the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve System, and the National Credit Union Administration.

If banks regulated by OTS fail, revenues for the agency decline; conversely, if the OTS regulates more banks, revenues increase. [1]

History

The OTS was established in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis. On television, President George H. W. Bush said, [2]

Never again will America allow any insured institution to operate normally if owners lack sufficient tangible capital to protect depositors and taxpayers alike.

and "trashed" the predecessor Federal Home Loan Bank Board; soon thereafter, the sign was changed to the "Office of Thrift Supervision". [3] Savings and Loan legislation—the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989—"abolished", [4] or renamed, the independent Federal Home Loan Bank Board to the Office of Thrift Supervision and placed it under Department of the Treasury supervision. [5] On 22 March 1990, in a setback to the George H. W. Bush administration, Federal District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that OTS appointments of the former director and acting director, M. Danny Wall and Salvatore R. Martoche, had been unconstitutional because they were not nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. [6]

In 1992, under Director T. Timothy Ryan, the OTS aggressively shut down troubled Savings and Loan (S&L) outfits, and was criticized by the industry and industry lawyers for not allowing some S&Ls that might survive to have a chance. [7] Ryan contrasted the OTS cleanup of the S&L industry to the former situation.

We're the regulator of the industry. We aren't the trade association and we're not its promoter. That's how they got into trouble the last time. They had a regulator who was a promoter.

S&Ls were "dropping like flies" and this presented problems for OTS staff—declining revenues led to a declining staff. [1] The OTS responded by marketing itself at industry meetings. [1] At one such meeting, federal regulators were "announcing a campaign to ease regulation" and they were in a photo-op over a stack of the federal regulations—holding garden shears signaling their intent to cut through them. [1] OTS Director James Gilleran brought a chainsaw. [1] "Companies got the message." [8] In 1998, OTS approved 43 charters, with more than a third going to non-banks. [9] In 2004 Gilleran said "our goal is to allow thrifts to operate with a wide breadth of freedom from regulatory intrusion". [10] The OTS "adopted an aggressively deregulatory stance toward the mortgage lenders it regulated... [and] allowed the reserves the banks held as a buffer against losses to dwindle to a historic low." [10]

In March 2007, a Government Accountability Office report noted that "In contrast [to the Federal Reserve], a substantial minority of the firms OTS oversees—especially the large, complex ones—have primary businesses other than those traditionally engaged in by thrifts, such as insurance, securities, or commercial activities." [11]

Section 312 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act transferred OTS functions to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), the Federal Reserve Board, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as of 21 July 2011. The OTS ceased to exist on 19 October 2011.

The end of the OTS prompted at least one thrift, Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, to convert to a credit union rather than meet the "strict" insurance regulations set forth in the Dodd-Frank Act. [12]

Reform

Responsibilities

OTS supervised holding companies as well as thrift institutions. This resulted in OTS providing consolidated supervision for such well-known firms as General Electric (GE), AIG, Inc., Ameriprise Financial, American Express, Morgan Stanley, and Merrill Lynch. OTS's consolidated supervision program for GE, AIG Inc., and Ameriprise was recognized as "equivalent" by the European Union—allowing these firms to operate their financial businesses in the EU without forming an EU holding company and submitting to supervision in the EU.

The OTS was the primary regulator of Federal Savings Associations (sometimes referred to as Federal thrifts). Federal savings associations include both Federal Savings Banks and Federal Savings and Loans. The OTS was also responsible for supervising Savings and Loan Holding Companies (SLHCs) and some state-chartered institutions.

Institutions regulated

The following are some of the larger institutions that were regulated by the OTS:

Indymac

In March 2008, OTS Director John M. Reich stated that the Savings and Loan industry remained vibrant due to the effectiveness of regulators. [17] Reich blamed Indymac's 11 July 2008 failure on $1.3bn of withdrawals in the fortnight following concerns raised from Senator Chuck Schumer over the bank's solvency. [18] [19] Schumer faulted the OTS. [20] The failure of IndyMac Bank was the fourth largest bank failure in United States history. [21] Prior to IndyMac's failure on 11 July 2008, the bank had come to rely heavily on higher cost, less stable, brokered deposits, as well as secured borrowings, to fund its operations. The bank had focused on stated income and other aggressively underwritten loans in areas with rapidly escalating home prices, particularly in California and Florida. [22]

On 21 July 2008, Mr. Reich described "interference with the regulatory process by reporting and disseminating speculation about the condition of financial institutions, thereby undermining public confidence in those institutions and causing serious harm" as a contributor to the failure of IndyMac as well as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Lehman Brothers. [23]

On 22 December 2008, Mr. Reich removed his agency's western director, Darrel W. Dochow for allowing IndyMac to backdate a capital infusion of $18 million from its parent company so that the bank would appear "well capitalized" in its 10-Q for the period ending 31 March 2008. According to a source with knowledge of the incident, at another point Mr. Dochow limited the scope of a review by OTS regulators of IndyMac's portfolio of loans and other assets, overruling the advice of others in the agency. [24] Mr. Dochow played a central role in the savings-and-loan scandal of the 1980s, overriding a recommendation by federal bank examiners in San Francisco to seize Lincoln Savings, the giant savings and loan owned by Charles Keating. Mr. Reich called the backdating irregularity "a relatively small factor" in the collapse of IndyMac. [25]

On 12 February 2009, Mr. Reich resigned, announcing he would step down 27 February. [26]

On 26 February 2009, the Treasury Department's inspector general released a report citing laxity at the OTS under Reich for adding significantly to the $10.7 billion in FDIC losses from the IndyMac failure, as well as the estimated $270 million in losses suffered by uninsured depositors. The report concluded that, under the law, OTS should have taken Prompt Corrective Action against IndyMac in May 2008. [27] Commenting on the report, Inspector General Eric Thorson dismissed Reich's claim that Senator Schumer's letters caused the failure. Marla Freedman, the assistant inspector general for audit, detailed a pattern of excess risk-taking and abuse of the lending process at IndyMac and the OTS's consistent and concurrent failure to act. Mr. Reich said in a letter to the inspector general that he agreed with the agency's filings. [28]

On 27 February 2009, Mr. Reich stepped down amidst the continuing audit of backdating at IndyMac and four other institutions. [29] Scott Polakoff, OTS senior deputy director and chief operating officer, hired under Mr. Reich, became acting director on his departure.

On 26 March 2009, Polakoff was removed and placed on leave by United States Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, amidst an announced further review and investigation of the backdating scandal by the U.S. Treasury's Inspector General. [30]

AIG

The OTS was pressed by the Senate Banking Committee to admit partial blame for the failure of American International Group (AIG). [31] In a congressional hearing, after Donald Kohn described how there was no regulator for AIG Financial Products or the company overall, Scott Polakoff interrupted. [32] [33] Polakoff stated that it was time for the OTS to take some responsibility because they had been "deemed an acceptable regulator for both US domestic and international operations". [34]

Due to OTS regulation of AIG, the Mayfair-based (London, UK) AIG Financial Products division was not subject to Financial Services Authority regulation. [35] OTS regulation allowed France's Commission Bancaire  [ fr ] to grant approval for a Paris-based banking subsidiary, Banque AIG. The Mayfair-based AIG Financial Products division then opened under a system which allowed branch openings in member countries after one EU regulator's approval.

That OTS was the primary regulator of AIG has been described as "nonsense" [36] and compared to "the super-heavyweight of the world going up against the 65 lb, 13-year-old, class weakling". [37] AIG operates in 130 countries. [38] The OTS had a small division that monitored derivatives including the credit default swaps at AIG. [39] After a dispute with Goldman Sachs in 2007 over the value of the credit default swaps, [40] the OTS did not initiate formal enforcement action, but "periodically raised concerns with AIG managers". [39] Other sources of concern were the three credit rating agencies and AIG's auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers. [40] In March 2008, after AIG disclosed valuation problems, the OTS sent a letter to AIG requesting a "corrective action plan" in 30 days. [39] The division overseeing AIG Financial Products was "quietly disbanded" and AIG missed their deadline. [39]

Locations

In addition to being headquartered in Washington D.C., OTS had regional offices in Atlanta, Dallas, Jersey City, San Francisco, and Chicago.

See also

Notes

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation</span> US government agency providing deposit insurance

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a United States government corporation supplying deposit insurance to depositors in American commercial banks and savings banks. The FDIC was created by the Banking Act of 1933, enacted during the Great Depression to restore trust in the American banking system. More than one-third of banks failed in the years before the FDIC's creation, and bank runs were common. The insurance limit was initially US$2,500 per ownership category, and this has been increased several times over the years. Since the enactment of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in 2010, the FDIC insures deposits in member banks up to $250,000 per ownership category. FDIC insurance is backed by the full faith and credit of the government of the United States, and according to the FDIC, "since its start in 1933 no depositor has ever lost a penny of FDIC-insured funds".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banking in the United States</span> Overview of the U.S. financial system

In the United States, banking had begun by the 1780s, along with the country's founding. It has developed into a highly influential and complex system of banking and financial services. Anchored by New York City and Wall Street, it is centered on various financial services, such as private banking, asset management, and deposit security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Savings and loan association</span> Type of financial institution

A savings and loan association (S&L), or thrift institution, is a financial institution that specializes in accepting savings deposits and making mortgage and other loans. The terms "S&L" and "thrift" are mainly used in the United States; similar institutions in the United Kingdom, Ireland and some Commonwealth countries include building societies and trustee savings banks. They are often mutually held, meaning that the depositors and borrowers are members with voting rights, and have the ability to direct the financial and managerial goals of the organization like the members of a credit union or the policyholders of a mutual insurance company. While it is possible for an S&L to be a joint-stock company, and even publicly traded, in such instances it is no longer truly a mutual association, and depositors and borrowers no longer have membership rights and managerial control. By law, thrifts can have no more than 20 percent of their lending in commercial loans—their focus on mortgage and consumer loans makes them particularly vulnerable to housing downturns such as the deep one the U.S. experienced in 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Community Reinvestment Act</span> US federal law

The Community Reinvestment Act is a United States federal law designed to encourage commercial banks and savings associations to help meet the needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Congress passed the Act in 1977 to reduce discriminatory credit practices against low-income neighborhoods, a practice known as redlining.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Home Loan Banks</span> 11 U.S. government-sponsored banks

The Federal Home Loan Banks are 11 U.S. government-sponsored banks that provide liquidity to financial institutions to support housing finance and community investment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Home Loan Bank Board</span> U.S. government agency

The Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) was a board created in 1932 that governed the Federal Home Loan Banks also created by the act, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) and nationally-chartered thrifts. It was abolished and superseded by the Federal Housing Finance Board and the Office of Thrift Supervision in 1989 due to the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, as Federal Home Loan Banks gave favorable lending to the thrifts it regulated leading to regulatory capture.

Federal savings associations, in the United States, are institutions chartered by the Office of Thrift Supervision which is now administered by Office of the Comptroller of the Currency after the agencies merged. Institutions chartered by the OTS are still regulated according to the rules and regulations of Federal Savings Banks. Mortgages issued by Federal Savings Banks are pursuant to the provisions of the Home Owners' Loan Act, a U.S. federal statute. Although the activities of federal thrifts were once confined primarily to taking deposits from consumers and making residential mortgage loans, federal thrifts are now authorized to offer a wide range of financial products and services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989</span>

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), is a United States federal law enacted in the wake of the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s.

IndyMac, a contraction of Independent National Mortgage Corporation, was an American bank based in California that failed in 2008 and was seized by the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John M. Reich</span> American banker

John M. Reich was a Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). He was sworn in on January 15, 2001, following an appointment by President of the United States Bill Clinton and served on the FDIC Board for eight years. Reich served as Vice Chairman of the Board of the FDIC from November 2002 until he was nominated on June 7, 2005 by President George W. Bush to be Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), and the U.S. Senate confirmed his nomination on July 29, 2005. He also served as Acting Chairman of the FDIC from July to August 2001. As Deputy Chairman, 2001–2005, Reich served as the Chair of FDIC's Audit Committee during a time when the General Accounting Office issued reportable conditions regarding information security at the Corporation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Stone Bank</span>

Old Stone Bank was a popular Rhode Island banking institution that was founded in Providence in 1819 as a mutual savings bank that was called Providence Institution for Savings.

The Superior Bank FSB was a Hinsdale, Illinois-based savings and loan association that collapsed in July 2001 with some $2.3b in assets. It was co-owned by the Pritzker family of Chicago.

Bank regulation in the United States is highly fragmented compared with other G10 countries, where most countries have only one bank regulator. In the U.S., banking is regulated at both the federal and state level. Depending on the type of charter a banking organization has and on its organizational structure, it may be subject to numerous federal and state banking regulations. Apart from the bank regulatory agencies the U.S. maintains separate securities, commodities, and insurance regulatory agencies at the federal and state level, unlike Japan and the United Kingdom. Bank examiners are generally employed to supervise banks and to ensure compliance with regulations.

The government interventions during the subprime mortgage crisis were a response to the 2007–2009 subprime mortgage crisis and resulted in a variety of government bailouts that were implemented to stabilize the financial system during late 2007 and early 2008.

All regulated financial institutions in the United States are required to file periodic financial and other information with their respective regulators and other parties. Thrifts are required by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), among other requirements, to file a key quarterly financial report called the Thrift Financial Report (TFR) to be filed electronically with the OTS. In 2007, there had been a proposal that thrifts convert to filing a similar report, the Report of Condition and Income commonly referred to as the Call Report, which banks prepare and file with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Since thrifts continue to file TFRs today, the proposal was dismissed or set aside for the time being.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2007–2008 financial crisis</span> Worldwide economic crisis

The 2007–2008 financial crisis, or Global Financial Crisis (GFC), was the most severe worldwide economic crisis since the Great Depression of 1929. Predatory lending targeting low-income homebuyers, excessive risk-taking by global financial institutions, and the bursting of the United States housing bubble culminated in a "perfect storm".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Otting</span> American businessman (born 1957)

Joseph M. Otting is an American businessman and government official. He served as the 31st Comptroller of the Currency from November 27, 2017 to May 29, 2020.

Regulator shopping is the choosing of a government or state regulating agency or body that imposes on the choosing entity regulatory treatment more favorable than that which would be obtained from another regulating agency or body that also has the authority to regulate the choosing entity. Regulator shopping may be an example of a "race to the bottom" practice.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 The Watchmen. p. 11.
  2. "Bank Crisis Through the Ages".
  3. The Watchmen. p. 10–11.
  4. "Records of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB)". National Archives and Records Administration . Retrieved 22 November 2009.
  5. Cash, Nathaniel C. (9 March 1990). "Nominee Seen for Top Savings Regulator". The New York Times . Retrieved 27 November 2009.
  6. Cash, Nathaniel C. (22 March 1990). "Setback for Bailout and Savings Regulator". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 November 2009.
  7. Leslie Wayne (21 January 1992). "Thrift Office's Eager Terminator". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 November 2009.
  8. The Watchmen. p. 12.
  9. Silverman, Gary (22 March 1999). "Commentary: It's a Wonderful Loophole". BusinessWeek . Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  10. 1 2 Appelbaum, Binyamin; Nakashima, Ellen (23 November 2008). "Banking Regulator Played Advocate Over Enforcer: Agency Let Lenders Grow Out of Control, Then Fail". The Washington Post .
  11. Government Accountability Office (15 March 2007). Financial Market Regulation: Agencies Engaged in Consolidated Supervision Can Strengthen Performance Measurement and Collaboration (Report). GAO-07-154. Retrieved 25 June 2019.
  12. Rubenstein, Jim (5 April 2012). "Thrivent Financial Bank Still on Track to Become Credit Union" . Credit Union Times. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
  13. Westbrook, Jesse; Vekshin, Alison (31 March 2008). "Paulson Plan Endorses Fed's Enhanced Market Authority". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 21 January 2013. Retrieved 7 January 2010.
  14. Labaton, Stephen (17 June 2009). "Obama Sought a Wide Range of Views on Finance Rules". The New York Times.
  15. "20 ways US House, Senate financial reforms differ". Reuters . Thomson Reuters. 6 January 2010. Retrieved 7 January 2010.
  16. Wagner, Daniel; Jacobs, Stevenson (23 May 2010). "New financial rules might not prevent next crisis". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 21 June 2019.
  17. Stephen LaBaton (22 November 2009). "Obstacles Seen as Treasury Proposes New Financial Rules". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 November 2009.
  18. James Daley (14 July 2008). "US Treasury credit deal to shore up Freddie and Fannie". The Independent . London. Retrieved 27 November 2009.
  19. "Schumer: Don't blame me for IndyMac failure". Cnn.com. 13 July 2008. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  20. Andrew Clark (16 July 2008). "US economy: Investigators target home loans at failed California bank". The Guardian . London. Retrieved 22 November 2009.
  21. Shalal-Esa, Andrea (25 September 2008). "FACTBOX: Top ten U.S. bank failures". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved 26 September 2008.
  22. "FDIC Board Approves Letter of Intent to Sell IndyMac Federal". Fdic.gov. 2 January 2009. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  23. "Remarks to American Bankers Association Summer Meeting" (PDF). 21 July 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 October 2011. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  24. Appelbaum, Binyamin; Nakashima, Ellen (23 December 2008). "Regulator Let IndyMac Bank Falsify Report". The Washington Post. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  25. Andrews, Edmund L. (22 December 2008). "Irregularity Uncovered at IndyMac". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  26. Switzky, Bryant Ruiz (12 February 2009). "OTS director Reich resigns". Washington Business Journal. American City Business Journals . Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  27. Treasury Office of Inspector General (26 February 2009). SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS: Material Loss Review of IndyMac Bank, FSB (PDF) (Report). OIG-09-032. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 April 2009.
  28. Heisel, William (26 February 2009). "Federal regulators ignored problems at IndyMac, report finds". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 3 March 2009.
  29. Crittenden, Michael R. (27 February 2009). "Regulators Missed Woes at IndyMac" . The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  30. Chadbourn, Margaret (27 March 2009). "Treasury's Watchdog Reviewing Backdating of Capital at Thrifts". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 8 December 2012. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  31. Mary Williams Walsh (5 March 2009). "Senators Ask Who Got Money From A.I.G." The New York Times. Retrieved 27 November 2009.
  32. The Watchmen. p. 8.
  33. Christopher J. Dodd (Majority statements), Donald Kohn (witness), Scott M. Polakoff (witness), Eric Dinallo (witness) (5 March 2009). American International Group: Examining what went wrong, government intervention, and implications for future regulation. 538 Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 538: United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Event occurs at 77:08 minutes in. Retrieved 13 December 2009.{{cite AV media}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  34. The Watchmen. p. 8–9.
  35. Richard Northedge (15 March 2009). "AIG London unit not regulated by FSA". The Independent. Retrieved 27 November 2009.
  36. Lex team (26 May 2009). "Office of Thrift Supervision" . Financial Times . Archived from the original on 11 December 2022. Retrieved 21 November 2009.
  37. The Watchmen. p. 10
  38. Dennis, Brady (6 March 2009). "Senators Call AIG 'Lost Cause'". The Washington Post. Retrieved 27 November 2009.
  39. 1 2 3 4 Jeff Gerth (10 November 2008). "Was AIG Watchdog Not Up to the Job?". ProPublica, MSN Money . Archived from the original on 16 December 2008. Retrieved 28 November 2009.
  40. 1 2 AIG E-Mail Trail Chronicles Crisis – Washington Post: Messages Sent Between Executives Track Insurance Giant's Colossal Collapse 30 December 2009. Washington Post (On CBS News).
Sources