Pro-war rhetoric

Last updated

Pro-war rhetoric is rhetoric or propaganda designed to convince its audience that war is necessary. The two main analytical approaches to pro-war rhetoric were founded by Ronald Reid, a professor of Communication Studies at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and Robert Ivie, a professor of Rhetoric and Public Communication and Culture at Indiana University (Bloomington). Reid's framework originated from inductively studying propaganda. Ivie uses a deductive approach based on the work of Kenneth Burke, claiming that "a people strongly committed to the ideal of peace, but simultaneously faced with the reality of war, must believe that the fault for any such disruption of their ideal lies with others" (Ivie 279).

Contents

Rhetorical framework of Ronald Reid

Reid's Three Topoi provide a basic framework for understanding pro-war rhetoric and propaganda: [1]

  1. Territorial appeals
  2. Ethnocentric appeals
  3. Appeals to optimism characterize pro-war rhetoric.

Reid also defines a fourth appeal, war aims. However, because this fourth aim supports the other topoi, it is often not identified as a separate category. [1] Due to these appeals, “American presidents have been able to impart a positive value to [the nation’s wars] as well as justify the nation’s involvement." [2] By understanding the persuasiveness of these appeals, Reid believes one can better understand wartime behavior. [1]

Ronald F. Reid (c. 1928–2002), a professor of Communication Studies at the University of Massachusetts Amherst at Amherst, retired in 1991 after 32 years of teaching. [3] Reid received a bachelor's from Pepperdine, a master's from University of New Mexico, and a Ph.D. from Purdue. [3]

Territorial appeals

Territorial appeals “taps into the ‘lower’ instincts we share with the animal kingdom." [4] As most animal species “mark off units of physical space” as “theirs” and will fight to retain that space, “many countries, led by the U.S., have developed a global sense of territoriality.” [1] [4] As a result, nations “regard physical space as property” and are prepared to defend that property. [4] The object of the territorial appeal is to gain support for war by convincing the audience that the country is in danger. [1] Countries are more willing to support war when they feel their land is threatened. [1] [4] Just as “a defending animal’s willingness to fight correlates with the extent to which its territory is invaded,” a human's willingness to fight correlates with the extent to which his country is threatened. [1]

Expansionism

Territorial appeals are often used to portray “expansionism as defensive by depicting it as a response to an existing outside threat or honorable effort to recover territory” that was unfairly taken. [1] [2] Thus, through territorial appeal, “even unjustified American imperialism…can be characterized as defensive.” [1] [4]

Encroachment appeals

Encroachment appeals are reminiscent of the domino theory. [1] By “narrating recent ‘encroachments’ along the frontier,” the orator proposes these seemingly isolated attacks are part of a bigger takeover conspiracy. [1]

Metaphysical appeals

There are some ideas/virtues countries assume as property. [1] “A populace may be motivated to embark upon a course of war because of the threat posed to its national ideals by a competing ideology." [2] Therefore, an orator can demonstrate a metaphysical territorial appeal by showing a threat to these ideals. [1]

Ethnocentric appeals

The Ethnocentric Appeal states that if the individuals in a culture belong and identify to it, they are likely to think their culture is superior to other cultures. [1] Ordinary ethnocentricity tends to lead those of a culture to ignore "outsiders." [1] The Ethnocentric Appeal concentrates on creating an ‘Us vs. Them’ mentality. [1] According to ethnocentricity, individuals often see their culture as superior to others. Therefore, when an orator is able to “establish a ‘realistic’ image of the enemy's savagery,” he “eliminate[s] peace as a viable alternative to war." [5] For example, during the American Revolution, the government told the people "God's plan of history called for progress, and the Revolution was an integral part of that plan." [6] This sets up the notion that "they" were "evil" and we are "good" because God is on our side. [6]

Emotional intensity

Pro-war rhetoric must "arouse ethnocentrism to a high level of emotional intensity." [1] To achieve this:

  1. The outsider must be hated. [1] To create hatred, orators use “decivilizing vehicles – including references to acts of nature, mechanized processes, predaceous animals, barbarous actions, and violent crimes." [5]
  2. The opposing culture must be shown as a possible threat, using "intense language which exploits the most basic and strongly held cultural values." [1] By making the opposing culture appear threatening, people of the "superior culture" will have more reason to be defensive. [1]

Appeals to optimism

An Appeal to Optimism creates the illusion war is not bad and that it has its positives. [1] This can be achieved in four ways:

  1. By controlling the news, don't tell the public what is going poorly. [7]
  2. Don't give the impression of being unprepared. [1]
  3. Show we’re stronger than our “enemy” through our “nation’s material strengths." [1]
  4. Use scapegoats to blame for wartime losses; “when the scapegoats are removed, victory will follow." [1] Reagan's war on drugs “absolve[d] individuals of direct blame for their addictions and instead concentrate[d] on substances and nebulous ‘drug criminals’ as the enemies." [8] Also, this is trying to show the audience that we are winning the war in different ways. This appeal uses spiritual phrases and phrases that show the strength of the military. [1] [8] “The necessity of protecting [a country's] ideals ‘transcends limited human powers'." [7] This appeal is intended to instill hope and confidence for a victory in the audience's mind. [7]

Appeals to war aims

War Aims support former appeals and provide an ending goal for the war. [1] [7] Missions “rhetorically create the sense of an objective response." [7] Nations want to bring about more peace and security. [1] For example, the war aims for security protect from future territorial threats of enemies. Permanent peace will ensure security. [7] If “the aim is total overthrow of the enemy,” the language is ambiguous, unclear, and utopian. [1] For example, “We seek to create a massive change." [8] If the “aims reflects a desire for security,” the language expresses clear anticipated results. [1] Presidents will “define an issue [and] the possible resolutions to that issue." [8]

Rhetorical framework of Robert Ivie

According to Ivie, pro-war rhetoric identifies three topoi; force vs. freedom, irrational vs. rational, and aggression vs. defense.

Force vs. freedom

This tactic portrays to the audience that they are entering war to provide freedom, and the opponent to force their values upon others (Ivie 284). This is accomplished by implying that the opponent is violent, while the audience's nation is willing to negotiate (Ivie 284).

Irrational vs. rational

This topos holds that the enemy is portrayed as irrational, responding "more to animalistic drives than principles of law" (Ivie 288). The enemy has an unenlightened intellect, not based on reason. Rhetors use this argument to prove that when an enemy such as this threatens the well-being of the world, even for a nation committed to neutrality and peace, war is the only choice (Ivie 289).

Aggression vs. defense

This idea portrays the enemy as the voluntary aggressor and the nation of the audience as the passive victims of aggression, only entering into war to ensure security (Ivie 290). "While the savage has acted against order, the victim has been forced to respond in its defense" (Ivie 290). Ivie describes the actions as either "voluntary" and "initial" or "involuntary" and "defensive" (Ivie 290). The purpose of this topos is to lay the blame on the enemy and justify reasons for the victimized nation to engage in action.

Examples

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Persuasion</span> Umbrella term of influence and mode of communication

Persuasion or persuasion arts is an umbrella term for influence. Persuasion can influence a person's beliefs, attitudes, intentions, motivations, or behaviours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public speaking</span> Performing a speech to a live audience

Public speaking, also called oratory, is the practice of delivering speeches to a live audience. Throughout history, public speaking has held significant cultural, religious, and political importance, emphasizing the necessity of effective rhetorical skills. It allows individuals to connect with a group of people to discuss any topic. The goal as a public speaker may be to educate, teach, or influence your audience. Individuals can utilize visual aids like a slideshow, pictures, and short videos to get their point across. Whether a student, teacher, preacher, or business owner;public speaking can be relevant for those careers. Utilizing public speaking skills is essential because it builds confidence and transforms how individuals share your ideas with others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetoric</span> Art of persuasion

Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. It is one of the three ancient arts of discourse (trivium) along with grammar and logic/dialectic. As an academic discipline within the humanities, rhetoric aims to study the techniques that speakers or writers use to inform, persuade, and motivate their audiences. Rhetoric also provides heuristics for understanding, discovering, and developing arguments for particular situations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evil Empire speech</span> 1983 anti-Soviet speech by Ronald Reagan

The "Evil Empire" speech was a speech delivered by US President Ronald Reagan to the National Association of Evangelicals on March 8, 1983, at the height of the Cold War and the Soviet–Afghan War. In that speech, Reagan referred to the Soviet Union as an "evil empire" and as "the focus of evil in the modern world". Reagan explicitly rejected the notion that the United States and the Soviet Union were equally responsible for the Cold War and the ongoing nuclear arms race between the two nations; rather, he asserted that the conflict was a battle between good and evil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Isocrates</span> Greek rhetorician and writer (436–338 BC)

Isocrates was an ancient Greek rhetorician, one of the ten Attic orators. Among the most influential Greek rhetoricians of his time, Isocrates made many contributions to rhetoric and education through his teaching and written works.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ideograph (rhetoric)</span>

An ideograph or virtue word is a word frequently used in political discourse that uses an abstract concept to develop support for political positions. Such words are usually terms that do not have a clear definition but are used to give the impression of a clear meaning. An ideograph in rhetoric often exists as a building block or simply one term or short phrase that summarizes the orientation or attitude of an ideology. Such examples notably include <liberty>, <freedom>, <democracy> and <rights>. Rhetorical critics use chevrons or angle brackets (<>) to mark off ideographs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visual rhetoric</span> Communication through visual elements

Visual rhetoric is the art of effective communication through visual elements such as images, typography, and texts. Visual rhetoric encompasses the skill of visual literacy and the ability to analyze images for their form and meaning. Drawing on techniques from semiotics and rhetorical analysis, visual rhetoric expands on visual literacy as it examines the structure of an image with the focus on its persuasive effects on an audience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethos</span> Greek word meaning character

Ethos is a Greek word meaning 'character' that is used to describe the guiding beliefs or ideals that characterize a community, nation, or ideology; and the balance between caution and passion. The Greeks also used this word to refer to the power of music to influence emotions, behaviors, and even morals. Early Greek stories of Orpheus exhibit this idea in a compelling way. The word's use in rhetoric is closely based on the Greek terminology used by Aristotle in his concept of the three artistic proofs or modes of persuasion alongside pathos and logos. It gives credit to the speaker, or the speaker is taking credit.

Pathos appeals to the emotions and ideals of the audience and elicits feelings that already reside in them. Pathos is a term most often used in rhetoric, as well as in literature, film and other narrative art.

<i>Inventio</i> Canon of rhetoric

Inventio, one of the five canons of rhetoric, is the method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric and comes from the Latin word, meaning "invention" or "discovery". Inventio is the central, indispensable canon of rhetoric, and traditionally means a systematic search for arguments.

The Rhetoric of Hitler's "Battle" is an influential essay written by Kenneth Burke in 1939 which offered a rhetorical analysis of Adolf Hitler's rise to power in Germany. Much of Burke's analysis focuses on Hitler's Mein Kampf. Burke identified four tropes as specific to Hitler's rhetoric: inborn dignity, projection device, symbolic rebirth, and commercial use. Several other tropes are discussed in the essay, "Persuasion".

Christine is a 1917 novel written by Elizabeth von Arnim using the pen-name Alice Cholmondeley. It is the only novel von Arnim wrote under that name. It is written in the style of a compilation of letters from Christine, an English girl studying in Germany, to her mother in Britain. It covers the period of May–August 1914. In the letters Christine is a witness to the mood in Germany leading up World War I. The book was initially marketed as non-fiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chaïm Perelman</span> Belgian philosopher (1912–1984)

Chaïm Perelman was a Belgian philosopher of Polish-Jewish origin. He was among the most important argumentation theorists of the 20th century. His chief work is the Traité de l'argumentation – la nouvelle rhétorique (1958), with Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, translated into English as The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver (1969).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glossary of rhetorical terms</span>

Owing to its origin in ancient Greece and Rome, English rhetorical theory frequently employs Greek and Latin words as terms of art. This page explains commonly used rhetorical terms in alphabetical order. The brief definitions here are intended to serve as a quick reference rather than an in-depth discussion. For more information, click the terms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Four Minute Men</span> Volunteer orators for the U.S. government (1917-18)

The Four Minute Men were a group of volunteers authorized by United States President Woodrow Wilson to give four-minute speeches on topics given to them by the Committee on Public Information (CPI). In 1917–1918, over 750,000 speeches were given in 5,200 communities by over 75,000 accomplished orators, reaching about 400 million listeners. The topics dealt with the American war effort in the First World War and were presented during the four minutes between reels changing in movie theaters across the country. The speeches were made to be four minutes so that they could be given at town meetings, restaurants, and other places that had an audience.

Robert Lynn Ivie is an American academic known for his works on American public rhetoric concerning war and terrorism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metaphoric criticism</span> English figure of speech

Metaphoric criticism is one school of rhetorical analysis used in English and speech communication studies. Scholars employing metaphoric criticism analyze texts by locating metaphors within texts and evaluating those metaphors in an effort to better understand ways in which authors appeal to their audiences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neo-Aristotelianism (literature)</span> View of literature and rhetorical criticism

Neo-Aristotelianism is a view of literature and rhetorical criticism propagated by the Chicago School — Ronald S. Crane, Elder Olson, Richard McKeon, Wayne Booth, and others — which means:

"A view of literature and criticism which takes a pluralistic attitude toward the history of literature and seeks to view literary works and critical theories intrinsically."

Crowd manipulation is the intentional or unwitting use of techniques based on the principles of crowd psychology to engage, control, or influence the desires of a crowd in order to direct its behavior toward a specific action. This practice is common to religion, politics and business and can facilitate the approval or disapproval or indifference to a person, policy, or product. The ethicality of crowd manipulation is commonly questioned.

The campaign rhetoric of Barack Obama is the rhetoric in the campaign speeches given by President of the United States, Barack Obama, between February 10, 2007, and November 5, 2008, for the 2008 presidential campaign. Obama became the 44th president after George W. Bush with running mate Joe Biden. In his campaign rhetoric, Obama used three main devices: motifs, American exceptionalism, and voicing.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Reid, Ronald F. "New England Rhetoric and the French War, 1754-1760: A Case Study in the Rhetoric of War." Communication Monographs 43 (1997): 259-286, The New York Times. January 15, 1992.
  2. 1 2 3 Bass, Jeff D. “Bass, Jeff D. “The Rhetorical Opposition to Controversial Wars: Rhetorical Timing as a Generic Consideration.” The Western Journal of Speech Communication 43” (Summer 1979): 180-191.
  3. 1 2 University of Massachusetts Amherst Obituaries, “UMASS Chronicles”. August 23, 2002 Archived 16 June 2004 at the Wayback Machine
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Donald, Ralph. “An Appeal to Fear Ain’t Nothin’ New: George W. Bush’s Middle East War Rhetoric and Territoriality in American Propaganda Films of World War II.” American Studies Today 16 (2007): 18-27.
  5. 1 2 Ivie, Robert L. “The Metaphor of Force in Prowar Discourse: The Case of 1812.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (1982): 240-253.
  6. 1 2 Reid, Ronald F. "Varying Historical Interpretations of the American Revolution:Some Rhetorical Perspectives." Communication Quarterly 23(2) (Spring 1975): 5-15.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Procter, David E. “The Rescue Mission: Assigning Guilt to a Chaotic Scene.” The Western Journal of Speech Communications 51 (1987): 245-255.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Elwood, William N. “Declaring War on the Home Front: Metaphor, Presidents, and the War on Drugs.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(2) (1995): 93-114.

Bibliography