Sahm rule

Last updated
Sahm rule 1949-2024 Sahm rule.webp
Sahm rule 1949-2024

In macroeconomics, the Sahm rule, or Sahm rule recession indicator, is a heuristic measure by the United States' Federal Reserve for determining when an economy has entered a recession. [1] It is useful in real-time evaluation of the business cycle and relies on monthly unemployment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). It is named after economist Claudia Sahm, formerly of the Federal Reserve and Council of Economic Advisors.

Contents

The Sahm rule states: [2]

When the three-month moving average of the national unemployment rate is 0.5 percentage point or more above its low over the prior twelve months, we are in the early months of recession.

Origination

The Sahm rule originates from a chapter in the Brookings Institution's report on the use of fiscal policy to stabilize the economy during recessions. [3] The chapter, written by Sahm, proposes fiscal policy to automatically send stabilizing payments to citizens to boost economic well-being. By automating this process she saw the opportunity to get aid to people faster. Because the sooner the help was distributed in her view the better the odds that small business can stay open and that people could stay in their homes and keep their jobs. Her rule should hereby function as an early warning to detect the early stages of an recession and then to step in and help manage the recession on autopilot with direct payments to individuals when conditions get bad. [4] Instead of relying on human intuition to determine when such payments should be sent, Sahm outlines a method-based case to trigger the payments. [5] The trigger suggested indicates an economy beginning a recession and is now known as the Sahm rule. The Sahm rule recession indicator was also featured early in a Goldman Sachs U.S. economic research report by economist William C. Dudley. [6] Edward McKelvey, a senior economist at Goldman Sachs, has also been credited with using the idea very early. [7]

Commentary

Dr. Sahm cautions:

"The Sahm rule is an empirical regularity. It’s not a proposition; it’s not a law of nature."

And she further explains:

"I created the Sahm rule to send out stimulus checks automatically. The idea was to act fast to make the recession less severe and help families. The star was always the stimulus check, not the indicator that other people named after me. [8] "

Implementation

The Sahm rule was published by The St. Louis Federal Reserve bank's Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) system in October 2019. [9] [10] It is retroactively calculated to evaluate performance from past recessions. The recession rule is defined as:

Sahm Recession Indicator signals the start of a recession when the three-month moving average of the national unemployment rate (U3) rises by 0.50 percentage points or more relative to its low during the previous 12 months. [11]

Relying on the change in unemployment from the previous 12 months means the natural rate of unemployment is seamlessly integrated. A rule relying on a fixed level of unemployment, in contrast, cannot take into account drifts caused by changes in demographics, technology, or labor market frictions. [12]

The rule only relies on a single data series, national unemployment, which is published monthly by the BLS. This differentiates the index from other recession indicators based on statistical models, which may rely on dozens of inputs. [13] Further, unemployment can be more easily understood than complex financial series. [14] [15]

Historical Accuracy

The Sahm rule is a robust tool that has been very accurate in identifying a downturn in the business cycle and almost always doesn't trigger outside of a recession. The simplicity of the calculation contributes to its reliability. The Sahm rule signals the early stages (onset) of a recession and generated only two false positive recession alerts since the year 1959 (there have been 11 recessions since 1950); in both instances — in 1959 and 1969 — it was just a little untimely, with the recession warning appearing a few months before a slide in the U.S. economy began. [16] In the case of the false positive warning related to the year 1959 it was followed by an actual recession six months later. The Sahm rule typically signals a recession before GDP data makes it clear. [17]

The Sahm rule is designed to indicate that the U.S. economy is in the early months of a recession, rather than forecasting future recessions. [18] While the historical performance and timeliness of the Sahm rule has been very accurate, the reliability of the Sahm rule in today's economy has been questioned by many economists (including Claudia Sahm) due to several distortions and there is reason to believe that the economy might act differently this time around due to unique unusual conditions. [19] [20] [21] [22] This suggests that caution should be exercised when interpreting the Sahm rule in the current unprecedented economic situation. Like all economic indicators, it should be considered alongside other economic data and indicators. However, the Sahm Rule remains a valuable tool for economists and policymakers for early detection of economic downturns.

Table: Historical accuracy of the Sahm rule; Alert coincides with recession: (U.S. unemployment rate, dates when the Sahm rule triggered & actual recession time) [23]
Unemployment rate %Sahm valueTime when Sahm > 0.5Recession starts...
3.50%0.63Nov 19534 months prior (Jul 1953)
4.50%0.50Oct 19572 months prior (Aug 1957)
5.80%0.60Nov 19595 months later (Apr 1960)
4.40%0.77Mar 19703 months prior (Dec 1969)
5.50%0.60Jul 19748 months prior (Nov 1973)
6.30%0.53Feb 19801 month prior (Jan 1980)
8.30%0.60Nov 19814 months prior (Jul 1981)
5.90%0.53Oct 19903 months prior (Jul 1990)
4.50%0.50Jun 20013 months prior (Mar 2001)
4.90%0.53Feb 20082 months prior (Dec 2007)
14.80%4.00Apr 20202 months prior (Feb 2020)
4.30%0.53Aug 2024-

In summary, the Sahm rule's reliability lies in its consistent performance throughout various economic climates, particularly in signaling the beginning of a recession with a high degree of accuracy.

Trigger threshold of the Sahm Rule

The nowadays more commonly used rule triggers a recession signal when the Sahm metric is crossing above 0.5%. Economist William C. Dudley recommended a lower trigger of 0.33%, [24] and economist Edward McKelvey recommended an even lower trigger of 0.3%. [25] Macro-economic writer Mike Shedlock recommends a trigger threshold of 0.4% as the best compromise halfway between McKelvey and Sahm, because as he explains, this already reduces the average lag time of the recession alert to just roughly one month (from a lag time of on average three months when using 0.5%), while not producing too many false positives (but he uses a slightly different rounding in his calculation).

"A trigger of 0.4 percent rounded to a single decimal point does a better job of weeding out false positives [than McKelvey or Dudley] without the lags of Sahm straight up." [25]

Analysis of differing trigger thresholds

Trigger thresholdLead-lag times [25] False positive warnings [25]
0.3%leads the actual recession start in three cases by two months and in one case by one monthproduces five (to six) false positive alerts
0.4%leads the actual recession start in two cases by one monthproduces two false positive alerts
0.5%leads the actual recession start in no caseproduces one false positive alert

Rounding

Mike Shedlock explains that he calculates the headline U.S. unemployment rate to three decimal places and then rounds to two. As example for July 2024, the widely used Sahm rule calculates a value of 0.53%, while Shedlock calculates a value of 0.49%. [25]

Two-sided Sahm rule modifications

Economists Pascal Michaillat and Emmanuel Saez have created a two-sided Sahm rule-based indicator [26] (which the Financial Times named the 'Michez rule' [27] ), using both the unemployment rate and also the vacancy rate for jobs. The economists noted that their modified indicator functioned for recessions going back to the year 1930 [28] , while Sahm's worked only back to the 1950s. Another notable difference: The 'Michez rule' is usually triggered earlier than the Sahm rule as it detects recessions on average 1.4 months after they have started. [29]

Reception

The Sahm rule has received recognition by popular economics news sources. [30] [15] [31] [32] American financial weekly newspaper Barron's describes the metric as a "well-regarded economic rule", [33] American financial news channel CNBC labels the recession indicator as a "fail-safe gauge," [34] while Investopedia writes that "economists love the indicator for its simplicity and reliability". [35]

Its low rate of false positives are attractive features. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell characterized the Sahm rule as a "statistical regularity" at a press conference in late July 2024. [36]

While the Sahm rule indicates recessions sooner than the formal NBER recession indications, which can take anywhere from half to two years, it is by no means predictive, [37] when using the 3-month simple moving average as filter (because this smoothing of the U.S unemployment data adds a multiple month lag to the calculation). The commonly used version of the Sahm rule with the smoothed 3-month average triggered approximately three months into each of the last NBER recession starts, with the beginning of the recession retroactively officially determined by the NBER. [38]

A lesser-known feature of the Sahm model is that it is particularly useful in assessing recession ends. The standard 3-month smoothed Sahm rule has on average a minimum two month lag to recession ends (while the unsmoothed-Sahm indicator provides for near perfect coincident signalling of business cycle troughs), according to Dwaine Van Vuuren.

See also

Related Research Articles

In economics, a recession is a business cycle contraction that occurs when there is a period of broad decline in economic activity. Recessions generally occur when there is a widespread drop in spending. This may be triggered by various events, such as a financial crisis, an external trade shock, an adverse supply shock, the bursting of an economic bubble, or a large-scale anthropogenic or natural disaster. But there is no official definition of a recession, according to the IMF.

An economic depression is a period of carried long-term economic downturn that is the result of lowered economic activity in one or more major national economies. Economic depression may be related to one specific country where there is some economic crisis that has worsened but most often reflexes historically the American Great Depression and similar economic status that may be recognized as existing at some country, several countries or even in many countries. It is often understood in economics that economic crisis and the following recession that may be named economic depression are part of economic cycles where the slowdown of the economy follows the economic growth and vice versa. It is a result of more severe economic problems or a downturn than the recession itself, which is a slowdown in economic activity over the course of the normal business cycle of growing economy.

An economic indicator is a statistic about an economic activity. Economic indicators allow analysis of economic performance and predictions of future performance. One application of economic indicators is the study of business cycles. Economic indicators include various indices, earnings reports, and economic summaries: for example, the unemployment rate, quits rate, housing starts, consumer price index, Inverted yield curve, consumer leverage ratio, industrial production, bankruptcies, gross domestic product, broadband internet penetration, retail sales, price index, and changes in credit conditions.

Business cycles are intervals of general expansion followed by recession in economic performance. The changes in economic activity that characterize business cycles have important implications for the welfare of the general population, government institutions, and private sector firms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Bureau of Economic Research</span> American private nonprofit research organization

The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is an American private nonprofit research organization "committed to undertaking and disseminating unbiased economic research among public policymakers, business professionals, and the academic community." The NBER is known for proposing start and end dates for recessions in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early 2000s recession</span> Recession that occurred in the early 2000s

The early 2000s recession was a major decline in economic activity which mainly occurred in developed countries. The recession affected the European Union during 2000 and 2001 and the United States from March to November 2001. The UK, Canada and Australia avoided the recession, while Russia, a nation that did not experience prosperity during the 1990s, began to recover from it. Japan's 1990s recession continued. A combination of the Dot Com Bubble collapse and the September 11th attacks lengthed and worsened the recession.

David Graham Blanchflower,, sometimes called Danny Blanchflower, is a British-American labour economist and academic. He is currently a tenured economics professor at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. He is also a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, part-time professor at the University of Glasgow and a Bloomberg TV contributing editor. He was an external member of the Bank of England's interest rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) from June 2006 to June 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inverted yield curve</span> Phenomenon when shorter term bonds yield higher interest rates than longer term bonds

In finance, an inverted yield curve is a yield curve in which short-term debt instruments have a greater yield than longer term bonds. An inverted yield curve is an unusual phenomenon; bonds with shorter maturities generally provide lower yields than longer term bonds.

While beginning in the United States, the Great Recession spread to Asia rapidly and has affected much of the region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Latvian financial crisis</span>

The 2008 Latvian financial crisis, which stemmed from the 2007–2008 financial crisis, was a major economic and political crisis in Latvia. The crisis was generated when an easy credit market burst, resulting in an unemployment crisis, along with the bankruptcy of many companies. Since 2010, economic activity has recovered and Latvia's economic growth rate was the fastest among the EU member states in the first three quarters of 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recession of 1949</span> Economic downturn in the United States

The recession of 1949 was a downturn in the United States lasting for 11 months. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the recession began in November 1948 and lasted until October 1949.

The Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) based in New York City, is an independent institute formed in 1996 by Geoffrey H. Moore, Anirvan Banerji, and Lakshman Achuthan. It provides economic modeling, financial databases, economic forecasting, and market cycles services to investment managers, business executives, and government policymakers.

In the United States, the Great Recession was a severe financial crisis combined with a deep recession. While the recession officially lasted from December 2007 to June 2009, it took many years for the economy to recover to pre-crisis levels of employment and output. This slow recovery was due in part to households and financial institutions paying off debts accumulated in the years preceding the crisis along with restrained government spending following initial stimulus efforts. It followed the bursting of the housing bubble, the housing market correction and subprime mortgage crisis.

This information is related to the effects of the Great Recession that happened worldwide from 2007 to 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic recovery</span> Phase of the business cycle following a recession

An economic recovery is the phase of the business cycle following a recession. The overall business outlook for an industry looks optimistic during the economic recovery phase.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Claudia Sahm</span> American economist

Claudia Rae Sahm is an American economist, currently serving as Chief Economist for New Century Advisors. She is also the founder of Sahm Consulting. Claudia was formerly director of macroeconomic policy at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, and a Section Chief at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, where she worked in various capacities from 2007 to 2019. Sahm specializes in macroeconomics and household finance. She is best known for the development of the Sahm rule, a Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) indicator for identifying recessions in real-time.

Since World War II, the United States economy has performed significantly better on average under the administration of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents. The reasons for this are debated, and the observation applies to economic variables including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth and corporate profits. The unemployment rate has risen on average under Republican presidents, while it has fallen on average under Democratic presidents. Budget deficits relative to the size of the economy were lower on average for Democratic presidents. Ten of the eleven U.S. recessions between 1953 and 2020 began under Republican presidents.

The Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions Index is a coincident business cycle indicator used in macroeconomics in the United States. The index measures business activity, which may be correlated with periods of expansion and contraction in the economy. The primary and novel function of the ADS index stems from its use of high-frequency economic data and subsequent high-frequency updating, opposed to the traditionally highly-lagged and infrequently-published macroeconomic data such as GDP.

References

  1. "'Sahm Rule' enters Fed lexicon as fast, real-time recession flag". Reuters. 2019-10-04. Retrieved 2023-01-12.
  2. Dr. Sahm, Claudia (2022-12-30). "The Sahm rule: I created a monster". Substack. Retrieved 2024-07-31.
  3. Shambaugh, Heather Boushey, Ryan Nunn, and Jay (2019-05-16). "Recession ready: Fiscal policies to stabilize the American economy". Brookings. Retrieved 2020-12-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. Sahm, Claudia (2024-08-12). "Are We in a Recession? The Sahm Rule Says Yes. It's Creator Says Not So Fast". Bloomberg Big Take audio podcast on Youtube. Retrieved 2024-08-17.
  5. Sahm, Claudia (2019-05-16). "Direct stimulus payments to individuals". Brookings. Retrieved 2020-12-20.
  6. van Vuuren, Dwaine (2024-01-01). "The Sahm Rule Redux". RecessionALERT. Retrieved 2024-07-31.
  7. Shedlock, Mike (2024-08-02). "The McKelvey (Sahm) Unemployment Rate Recession Rule Just Triggered".
  8. Dr. Sahm, Claudia (2022-12-30). "The Sahm rule: I created a monster". Substack. Retrieved 2024-07-31.
  9. "FRED Adds Sahm Rule Recession Indicators | St. Louis Fed". 2019-10-16. Archived from the original on 2019-10-16. Retrieved 2020-12-20.
  10. "FRED Adds Sahm Rule Recession Indicators | St. Louis Fed Economic Research". 2 October 2019. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  11. Sahm, Claudia, Real-time Sahm Rule Recession Indicator [SAHMREALTIME], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SAHMREALTIME.December 19, 2020.
  12. Sahm, Claudia (2019-05-16). "Direct stimulus payments to individuals". Brookings. p. 77. Retrieved 2020-12-20.
  13. Berge, Travis J. (2015-05-13). "Predicting Recessions with Leading Indicators: Model Averaging and Selection over the Business Cycle" . Journal of Forecasting. 34 (6): 455–471. doi:10.1002/for.2345. ISSN   0277-6693.
  14. Schneider, Howard (2019-10-04). "'Sahm Rule' enters Fed lexicon as fast, real-time recession flag". Reuters. Retrieved 2020-12-20.
  15. 1 2 "The Sahm Rule With The Eponymous Economist : The Indicator from Planet Money". NPR.org. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  16. "U.S. employers likely added 175,000 jobs in July as labor market cools gradually". AP - The Associated Press, Washington. 2024-08-02. Retrieved 2024-08-02.
  17. "Sahm Rule Recession Indicator". Current Market Valuation (CMV) by Gramalam, LLC. 2024-01-01.
  18. Sahm, Claudia (2024-03-29). "No, you didn't invent the Sahm rule and that's ok, we need more tools!". Substack.
  19. Hetzner, Christiaan (2024-07-29). "Wall Street is worrying about the 'Sahm Rule,' which predicts recessions—but its creator is not, yet". Fortune.
  20. Leonhardt, Megan (2024-08-02). "Today's Jobs Report Triggered a Recession Indicator. But Even Its Creator Doesn't Think There Is a Downturn". Barron's.
  21. Daniel, Will (2024-08-02). "This recession indicator is flashing red, but the 'Sahm Rule' creator says 'this time really could be different'". Fortune.
  22. Jones, Charisse (2024-08-04). "Are we in a recession? The Sahm rule explained". USA Today.
  23. Goldstein, Steve (2024-08-02). "A closely tracked recession indicator, the Sahm rule, has now been triggered. Here's what that means". Marketwatch.
  24. van Vuuren, Dwaine (2024-01-01). "The Sahm Rule Redux". RecessionALERT. Retrieved 2024-07-31.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 Shedlock, Mike (2024-08-02). "The McKelvey (Sahm) Unemployment Rate Recession Rule Just Triggered".
  26. Michaillat, Pascal; Saez, Emmanuel (2024-08-11). "General Economics - Has the Recession Started?". arXiv. Retrieved 2024-08-17.
  27. Keynes, Soumaya (2024-08-16). "Simple indicators of whether the US is in recession are flawed - Investors are going to have to live with some uncertainty". Financial Times. Retrieved 2024-08-17.
  28. Cloonan, Kelly (2024-08-12). "There's a 40% chance the US economy is already in a recession, according to a new indicator". Business Insider. Retrieved 2024-08-17.
  29. Michaillat, Pascal; Saez, Emmanuel (2024-08-11). "General Economics - Has the Recession Started?". arXiv. Retrieved 2024-08-17.
  30. "How to spot a recession". The Economist. 2019-06-11. ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  31. "America's recession indicators are more busted than ever". Axios. 2024-07-23. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  32. "Keep Sahm and Carry On". The New York Times. 2024-07-30. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  33. "Every Rule Has Its Exception. That May Be the Case for This Recession Indicator". Barron's. 2024-08-01. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  34. "Why an indicator that has foretold almost every recession doesn't seem to be working anymore". CNBC. 2024-07-24. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  35. "This Week's Jobs Report Could Trigger a Usually Reliable Recession Indicator". Investopedia. 2024-07-29. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  36. "Jobs report could trigger closely watched recession indicator". yahoo! finance. 2024-07-31. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  37. "Business Cycle Dating". NBER. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  38. Brown, Randy. "This New Rule To Identify Recessions Could Give Investors An Edge". Forbes. Retrieved 2020-12-21.