Self-concealment

Last updated

Self-concealment is a psychological construct defined as "a predisposition to actively conceal from others personal information that one perceives as distressing or negative". [1] Its opposite is self-disclosure. [1] [2]

Contents

The concealed personal information (thoughts, feelings, actions, or events) is highly intimate, negative in valence and has three characteristics: it is a subset of private information, can be consciously accessed, and is actively concealed from others. Self-concealment significantly contributes to negative psychological health.

Historical context

Secrets and secret keeping have been a longstanding interest of psychologists and psychotherapists. [3] Jourard's [4] [5] work on self-disclosure and Pennebaker's research on the health benefits of disclosing traumatic events and secrets set the stage for the conceptualization and measurement of self-concealment.

Jourard's research pointed to the conclusion that stress and illness result not only from low self-disclosure, but more so from the intentional avoidance of being known by another person. In a later line of research, Pennebaker [6] [7] and his colleagues examined the confiding-illness relation or the inhibition-disease link and found that not expressing thoughts and feelings about traumatic events is associated with long-term health effects. Pennebaker attributed the unwillingness to disclose distressing personal information to either circumstances or individual differences. The self-concealment construct, and the scale for its measurement, the Self-Concealment Scale, were introduced to permit assessment and conceptualization of individual differences on this personality dimension.

Psychological effects

Self-concealment uniquely and significantly contributes to the prediction of anxiety, depression, and physical symptoms. [1] Subsequent research has examined the effects of self-concealment on subjective well-being and coping, finding that high self-concealment is associated with psychological distress and self-reported physical symptoms, [8] anxiety and depression, [9] [10] [11] shyness, negative self-esteem, [12] loneliness, [13] rumination, [14] trait social anxiety, [15] social anxiety, [16] and self-silencing, [17] ambivalence over emotional expressiveness, [18] maladaptive mood regulation, [19] and acute and chronic pain. [20]

Individuals with increased inferiority feelings have a higher tendency toward self-concealment, which in turn results in an increase in loneliness and a decrease in happiness. [21]

Research

Theoretical models offered to explain the consistent finding of negative health effects for self-concealment include:

Kelly offers a comprehensive review of several explanatory models and the evidence supporting each of them, concluding that a genetic component shared by high self-concealers might make them both more prone to self-conceal and more vulnerable to physical and psychological problems. [27]

Research studies have focused on the relation of self-concealment to attachment orientations, [28] [29] [30] help seeking and attitudes toward counseling, [31] [32] [33] desire for greater (physical) interpersonal distance, [30] stigma, [34] [35] distress disclosure, [9] lying behavior and authenticity, [36] [37] [38] and psychotherapy process. [31] [39] [40]

Research also focuses on self-concealment in specific populations: LGBT, [16] [35] [41] [42] multicultural, [43] [44] [45] and adolescents, families, and romantic partners. [36] [46] [47]

A recent review of 137 studies using the Self-Concealment Scale presented a working model for the antecedents of self-concealment and the mechanisms of action for its health effects. The authors conceptualize self-concealment as a "complex trait-like motivational construct where high levels of SC motivation energize a range of goal-directed behaviors (e.g., keeping secrets, behavioral avoidance, lying) and dysfunctional strategies for the regulation of emotions (e.g., expressive suppression) which serve to conceal negative or distressing personal information." [48] These mechanisms are seen as then affecting health through direct and indirect pathways, and as being "energized by a conflict between urges to conceal, and reveal—a dual-motive conflict which eventually leads to adverse physiological effects and a breakdown of self-regulatory resources". [49]

Self-Concealment Scale

The 10-item Self-Concealment Scale (SCS) [1] measures the degree to which a person tends to conceal personal information perceived as negative or distressing. The SCS has proven to have excellent psychometric properties (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and unidimensionality. [1] [50] Representative items include: "I have an important secret that I haven't shared with anyone", "There are lots of things about me that I keep to myself", "Some of my secrets have really tormented me", "When something bad happens to me, I tend to keep it to myself", and "My secrets are too embarrassing to share with others".

In marginalized populations

Minority groups employ self-concealment to manage perceived stigma. [51] For example, LGBT people (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans) people, who are stigmatized (see coming out) for the characteristics inherent to their sexual identities or gender identity, employ self-concealment as a result. [52] [53]

Self-concealment is observed in African, Asian and Latin American international college students. [54] For African Americans in particular their self-concealment correlates with the degree of their Afrocentric cultural values. [55] Arab and Middle Eastern people have been documented employing the following identity negotiation strategies:

Self-concealment strategies can also present in those with sexual paraphilias. Research in the experiences of furries, a stigmatized group, found that they are more likely to self disclose if there is little difference in power between the furry and the individual with whom they are disclosing their identity to. [51]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Larson & Chastain (1990).
  2. 1 2 Uysal, Lin & Knee (2009).
  3. ↑ Larson (1993).
  4. ↑ Jourard (1971a).
  5. ↑ Jourard (1971b).
  6. ↑ Pennebaker & Chew (1985).
  7. ↑ Pennebaker, Zech & Rimé (2001).
  8. ↑ Cepeda-Benito & Short (1998).
  9. 1 2 Kahn & Hessling (2001).
  10. ↑ Kelly & Achter (1995).
  11. ↑ Pennebaker, Colder & Sharp (1990).
  12. ↑ Ichiyama et al. (1993).
  13. ↑ Cramer & Lake (1998).
  14. ↑ King, Emmons & Woodley (1992).
  15. ↑ Endler et al. (2002).
  16. 1 2 Potoczniak, Aldea & DeBlaere (2007).
  17. ↑ Cramer, Gallant & Langlois (2005).
  18. ↑ Barr, Kahn & Schneider (2008).
  19. ↑ Wismeijer et al. (2009).
  20. ↑ Uysal & Lu (2011).
  21. ↑ Akdoğan & Çimşir (2019).
  22. ↑ Pennebaker (1985).
  23. ↑ Pennebaker & Beall (1986).
  24. ↑ Wegner, Lane & Dimitri (1994).
  25. ↑ Wegner, Lane & Pennebaker (1995).
  26. ↑ Bem (1967).
  27. ↑ Kelly (2002) , p. 217.
  28. ↑ Lopez (2001).
  29. ↑ Lopez, Mitchell & Gormley (2002).
  30. 1 2 Yukawa, Tokuda & Sato (2007).
  31. 1 2 Fedde (2010).
  32. ↑ Hao & Liang (2007).
  33. ↑ Kimura & Mizuno (2004).
  34. ↑ Masuda & Boone (2011).
  35. 1 2 Pachankis & Goldfried (2010).
  36. 1 2 Brunell et al. (2010).
  37. ↑ Engels, Finkenauer & van Kooten (2006).
  38. ↑ Lopez & Rice (2006).
  39. ↑ Kahn, Achter & Shambaugh (2001).
  40. ↑ Wild (2004).
  41. ↑ Agyemang (2007).
  42. ↑ Selvidge, Matthews & Bridges (2008).
  43. ↑ Masuda et al. (2009).
  44. ↑ Engels et al. (2005).
  45. ↑ Masuda, Anderson & Sheehan (2009).
  46. ↑ Finkenauer et al. (2009).
  47. ↑ Frijns et al. (2009).
  48. ↑ Larson et al. (2015) , p. 708.
  49. ↑ Larson et al. (2015) , p. 709.
  50. ↑ Cramer & Barry (1999).
  51. 1 2 Plante et al. (2013).
  52. ↑ Johnson et al. (2010).
  53. ↑ Adams (2010).
  54. ↑ Constantine, Okazaki & Utsey (2004).
  55. ↑ Wallace & Constantine (2005).
  56. ↑ Marvasti (2005).

Related Research Articles

In social psychology, fundamental attribution error, also known as correspondence bias or attribution effect, is a cognitive attribution bias where observers underemphasize situational and environmental factors for the behavior of an actor while overemphasizing dispositional or personality factors. In other words, observers tend to overattribute the behaviors of others to their personality and underattribute them to the situation or context. Although personality traits and predispositions are considered to be observable facts in psychology, the fundamental attribution error is an error because it misinterprets their effects.

In the psychology of self, one's self-concept is a collection of beliefs about oneself. Generally, self-concept embodies the answer to the question "Who am I?".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Self-handicapping</span> Cognitive strategy

Self-handicapping is a cognitive strategy by which people avoid effort in the hopes of keeping potential failure from hurting self-esteem. It was first theorized by Edward E. Jones and Steven Berglas, according to whom self-handicaps are obstacles created, or claimed, by the individual in anticipation of failing performance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Perfectionism (psychology)</span> Personality trait

Perfectionism, in psychology, is a broad personality trait characterized by a person's concern with striving for flawlessness and perfection and is accompanied by critical self-evaluations and concerns regarding others' evaluations. It is best conceptualized as a multidimensional and multilayered personality characteristic, and initially some psychologists thought that there were many positive and negative aspects.

Stereotype threat is a situational predicament in which people are or feel themselves to be at risk of conforming to stereotypes about their social group. It is theorized to be a contributing factor to long-standing racial and gender gaps in academic performance. Since its introduction into the academic literature, stereotype threat has become one of the most widely studied topics in the field of social psychology.

Cultural psychology is the study of how cultures reflect and shape their members' psychological processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Confidence</span> State of trusting that a belief or course of action is correct

Confidence is the state of being clear-headed: either that a hypothesis or prediction is correct, or that a chosen course of action is the best or most effective. Confidence comes from the Latin word fidere which means "to trust". In contrast, arrogance or hubris is a state of unmerited confidence—belief lacking evidence and/or a reason. Overconfidence or presumptuousness is excessive belief in success without regard for potential failure. Confidence can be a self-fulfilling prophecy, as those without it may fail because they lack it, and those with it may succeed because they have it rather than because of an innate ability or skill. We develop a tractable method for augmenting macroeconomic models with autonomous variation in higher-order beliefs

Positive illusions are unrealistically favorable attitudes that people have towards themselves or to people that are close to them. Positive illusions are a form of self-deception or self-enhancement that feel good; maintain self-esteem; or avoid discomfort, at least in the short term. There are three general forms: inflated assessment of one's own abilities, unrealistic optimism about the future, and an illusion of control. The term "positive illusions" originates in a 1988 paper by Taylor and Brown. "Taylor and Brown's (1988) model of mental health maintains that certain positive illusions are highly prevalent in normal thought and predictive of criteria traditionally associated with mental health."

Leslie Samuel Greenberg is a Canadian psychologist born in Johannesburg, South Africa, and is one of the originators and primary developers of Emotion-Focused Therapy for individuals and couples. He is a professor emeritus of psychology at York University in Toronto, and also director of the Emotion-Focused Therapy Clinic in Toronto. His research has addressed questions regarding empathy, psychotherapy process, the therapeutic alliance, and emotion in human functioning.

Self-enhancement is a type of motivation that works to make people feel good about themselves and to maintain self-esteem. This motive becomes especially prominent in situations of threat, failure or blows to one's self-esteem. Self-enhancement involves a preference for positive over negative self-views. It is one of the three self-evaluation motives along with self-assessment and self-verification . Self-evaluation motives drive the process of self-regulation, that is, how people control and direct their own actions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James W. Pennebaker</span> U.S. psychology professor and language analyst

James Whiting Pennebaker is an American social psychologist. He is a Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Texas at Austin and a member of the Academy of Distinguished Teachers. His research focuses on the relationship between natural language use, health, and social behavior, most recently "how everyday language reflects basic social and personality processes".

Goal orientation, or achievement orientation, is an "individual disposition towards developing or validating one's ability in achievement settings". In general, an individual can be said to be mastery or performance oriented, based on whether one's goal is to develop one's ability or to demonstrate one's ability, respectively. A mastery orientation is also sometimes referred to as a learning orientation.

Stigma management is the process of concealing or disclosing aspects of one's identity to minimize social stigma.

The theory of narrative identity postulates that individuals form an identity by integrating their life experiences into an internalized, evolving story of the self that provides the individual with a sense of unity and purpose in life. This life narrative integrates one's reconstructed past, perceived present, and imagined future. Furthermore, this narrative is a story – it has characters, episodes, imagery, a setting, plots, and themes and often follows the traditional model of a story, having a beginning, middle, and an end (denouement). Narrative identity is the focus of interdisciplinary research, with deep roots in psychology.

The six-factor model of psychological well-being is a theory developed by Carol Ryff that determines six factors that contribute to an individual's psychological well-being, contentment, and happiness. Psychological well-being consists of self-acceptance, positive relationships with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, a feeling of purpose and meaning in life, and personal growth and development. Psychological well-being is attained by achieving a state of balance affected by both challenging and rewarding life events.

Interpersonal emotion regulation is the process of changing the emotional experience of one's self or another person through social interaction. It encompasses both intrinsic emotion regulation, in which one attempts to alter their own feelings by recruiting social resources, as well as extrinsic emotion regulation, in which one deliberately attempts to alter the trajectory of other people's feelings.

Simine Vazire is Professor of Psychology Ethics and Wellbeing at the University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. She was formerly Professor of Psychology at the University of California, Davis and at Washington University in St. Louis. She is a social and personality psychologist who studies how self-perception and self-knowledge influence one's personality and behavior. She obtained a PhD in the social and personality psychology program at the University of Texas at Austin.

Intergroup relations refers to interactions between individuals in different social groups, and to interactions taking place between the groups themselves collectively. It has long been a subject of research in social psychology, political psychology, and organizational behavior.

Monica Rose Biernat is a social psychologist known for her research on social judgment, stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. She is a University Distinguished Professor of Psychology at the University of Kansas.

Elizabeth Mitchell Altmaier is a counseling psychologist whose clinical and academic work has focused on issues related to overcoming life-threatening and traumatic circumstances. Altmaier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Iowa.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.