Sino-Uralic languages

Last updated
Sino-Uralic
(Proposed, no significant support)
Geographic
distribution		Northern Eurasia, East Asia
Linguistic classification Proposed language family
Subdivisions
Language codes
Glottolog None
Sino-Uralic language theory.png
Sino-Uralic languages [1]

Sino-Uralic or Sino-Finnic is a long-range linguistic proposal that links the Sinitic languages (Chinese) and the Uralic languages. Sino-Uralic is proposed as an alternative to the Sino-Tibetan family [1] [2] [3] and is at odds with mainstream comparative linguistics, which firmly includes the Sinitic languages in the Sino-Tibetan family. [4] The proposal has been brought forward by the Chinese linguist Jingyi Gao, based on works by 19th century linguists such as Karl August Hermann. [5] [6] [7] However, connections with the Uralic and other language families are generally seen as speculative. [8]

Contents

Theory

Gao argued that Chinese has three major layers, he saw the root of Chinese as coming from a common Sino-Uralic source, the second layer coming from Indo-European during the Chalcolithic age or later and the third layer coming from Yeniseian during the Bronze Age. Jingyi Gao presented the theory as an alternative to the commonly accepted Sino-Tibetan language family. Gao argued that there are multiple problems with the Sino-Tibetan language family and that similarities between Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman are better explained as being the result of loaning and mutual influence instead of being one language family, although mainstream comparative linguistics has strongly established Sino-Tibetan as a real language family. [1] [6] [9]

Gao argued that the monosyllabic structure of Chinese vocabulary was a later development due to external influences, arguing that the word structure of the Sinitic languages in the past was closer to the Uralic languages. [1] [10] Similarly, Karl August Hermann argued that the monosyllabic word structure in Sinitic is not an obstacle to a linguistic relationship. [11]

History

The earliest known mention of a possible relationship between the Uralic and Sinitic languages was made by Sajnovics in 1770, who raised questions about a possible relation of Chinese and Hungarian, due to apparent lexical similarities. [12] [13] [14] [15] Then in 1895, a relation between Sinitic and Uralic was proposed by the Estonian linguist Karl August Hermann . Karl August Hermann made a comparison of Estonian, Finnish and Chinese, arguing that they were related, although he also included Altaic (which itself is today generally rejected) in the family. [11] [16] [12] In the modern day its main advocate has been Jingyi Gao, first proposing it in 2005 and later making another book on the topic in 2008 along with making later articles. [17] [18] Estonian academics and linguists such as Ago Künnap, Jaan Kaplinski, Urmas Sutrop and Märt Läänemets along with a few Chinese professors such as Feng Zheng, Li Baojia and Jiang Jicheng have expressed interest over the theory and calling for more studies on the topic. Despite this, they have not endorsed Gao's theory of a Sino-Uralic language family. [1] [2] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] George van Driem argues that Sino-Uralic along with other theories such as Sino-Indo-European are constructed by using flawed methodologies with inadequate knowledge of historical Chinese and the Trans-Himalayan languages, representing false language families. According to van Driem, the theory is not supported by proper evidence. [4]

Before Gao, Morris Swadesh had already theorized about a relation between Sinitic and Uralic, proposing a more radical and massive Dené-Finnish grouping which encompasses Athabaskan, Uralic and the Sino-Tibetan languages. Swadesh's theory has been called "radical". [8] Another similar large language family including Sinitic and Uralic, was suggested by Karl Bouda in 1950, his theory included: Sino-Tibetan, Uralic, Yeniseian, Austronesian and others being distantly related. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Finno-Ugric languages</span> Subdivision of the Uralic languages

Finno-Ugric is a traditional linguistic grouping of all languages in the Uralic language family except for the Samoyedic languages. Its once commonly accepted status as a subfamily of Uralic is based on criteria formulated in the 19th century and is criticized by some contemporary linguists such as Tapani Salminen and Ante Aikio. The three most spoken Uralic languages, Hungarian, Finnish, and Estonian, are all included in Finno-Ugric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Tibetan languages</span> Language family native to Asia

Sino-Tibetan is a family of more than 400 languages, second only to Indo-European in number of native speakers. Around 1.4 billion people speak a Sino-Tibetan language. The vast majority of these are the 1.3 billion native speakers of Sinitic languages. Other Sino-Tibetan languages with large numbers of speakers include Burmese and the Tibetic languages. Four United Nations member states have a Sino-Tibetan language as their main native language. Other languages of the family are spoken in the Himalayas, the Southeast Asian Massif, and the eastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. Most of these have small speech communities in remote mountain areas, and as such are poorly documented.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uralic languages</span> Language family of Northern Eurasia

The Uralic languages, sometimes called the Uralian languages, are spoken predominantly in Europe and North Asia. The Uralic languages with the most native speakers are Hungarian, Finnish, and Estonian. Other languages with speakers above 100,000 are Erzya, Moksha, Mari, Udmurt and Komi spoken in the European parts of the Russian Federation. Still smaller minority languages are Sámi languages of the northern Fennoscandia; other members of the Finnic languages, ranging from Livonian in northern Latvia to Karelian in northwesternmost Russia; and the Samoyedic languages, Mansi and Khanty spoken in Western Siberia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yeniseian languages</span> Language family of central Siberia

The Yeniseian languages are a family of languages that are spoken by the Yeniseian people in the Yenisei River region of central Siberia. As part of the proposed Dené–Yeniseian language family, the Yeniseian languages have been argued to be part of "the first demonstration of a genealogical link between Old World and New World language families that meets the standards of traditional comparative-historical linguistics". The only surviving language of the group today is Ket.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dené–Caucasian languages</span> Proposed language family

Dené–Caucasian is a discredited language family proposal that includes widely-separated language groups spoken in the Northern Hemisphere: Sino-Tibetan languages, Yeniseian languages and Burushaski in Asia; Na-Dené languages in North America; as well as Vasconic languages and North Caucasian languages from Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indo-Uralic languages</span> Controversial hypothetical language family consisting of Indo-European and Uralic

Indo-Uralic is a highly controversial linguistic hypothesis proposing a genealogical family consisting of Indo-European and Uralic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uralo-Siberian languages</span> Proposed language family including Uralic, Yukaghir, Eskimo–Aleut and possibly Nivkh

Uralo-Siberian is a hypothetical language family consisting of Uralic, Yukaghir, and Eskaleut. It was proposed in 1998 by Michael Fortescue, an expert in Eskaleut and Chukotko-Kamchatkan, in his book Language Relations across Bering Strait. Some have attempted to include Nivkh in Uralo-Siberian. Until 2011, it also included Chukotko-Kamchatkan. However, after 2011 Fortescue only included Uralic, Yukaghir and Eskaleut in the theory, although he argued that Uralo-Siberian languages have influenced Chukotko-Kamchatkan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uralic–Yukaghir languages</span> Proposed language family

Uralic–Yukaghir, also known as Uralo-Yukaghir, is a highly controversial proposed language family composed of Uralic and Yukaghir.

Estonian vocabulary, i.e., the vocabulary of the Estonian language, was influenced by many other language groups.

Paul Ariste was an Estonian linguist renowned for his studies of the Finno-Ugric languages, Yiddish and Baltic Romani language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eskimo–Uralic languages</span> Proposed language family including Uralic and Eskaleut languages

The Eskimo–Uralic hypothesis posits that the Uralic and Eskimo–Aleut language families belong to a common macrofamily. It is not generally accepted by linguists because the similarities can also be merely areal features, common to unrelated language families. In 1818, the Danish linguist Rasmus Rask grouped together the languages of Greenlandic and Finnish. The Eskimo–Uralic hypothesis was put forward by Knut Bergsland in 1959. Ante Aikio stated that it's possible that there exists some connection between the two families, but exact conclusions can't be drawn and the similarities could exist by loaning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibeto-Burman languages</span> Group of the Sino-Tibetan language family

The Tibeto-Burman languages are the non-Sinitic members of the Sino-Tibetan language family, over 400 of which are spoken throughout the Southeast Asian Massif ("Zomia") as well as parts of East Asia and South Asia. Around 60 million people speak Tibeto-Burman languages. The name derives from the most widely spoken of these languages, Burmese and the Tibetic languages, which also have extensive literary traditions, dating from the 12th and 7th centuries respectively. Most of the other languages are spoken by much smaller communities, and many of them have not been described in detail.

Sino-Austronesian or Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian is a proposed language family suggested by Laurent Sagart in 1990. Using reconstructions of Old Chinese, Sagart argued that the Austronesian languages are related to the Sinitic languages phonologically, lexically and morphologically. Sagart later accepted the Sino-Tibetan languages as a valid group and extended his proposal to include the rest of Sino-Tibetan. He also placed the Tai–Kadai languages within the Austronesian family as a sister branch of Malayo-Polynesian. The proposal has been largely rejected by other linguists who argue that the similarities between Austronesian and Sino-Tibetan more likely arose from contact rather than being genetic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Uralic homeland</span> Location where the Proto-Uralic language originated

The Proto-Uralic homeland is the earliest location in which the Proto-Uralic language was spoken, before its speakers dispersed geographically causing it to diverge into multiple languages. Various locations have been proposed and debated, although as of 2022 "scholarly consensus now gravitates towards a relatively recent provenance of the Uralic languages east of the Ural mountains".

Proto-Sino-Tibetan (PST) is the hypothetical linguistic reconstruction of the Sino-Tibetan proto-language and the common ancestor of all languages in it, including the Sinitic languages, the Tibetic languages, Yi, Bai, Burmese, Karen, Tangut, and Naga. Paul K. Benedict (1972) placed a particular emphasis on Old Chinese, Classical Tibetan, Jingpho, Written Burmese, Garo, and Mizo in his discussion of Proto-Sino-Tibetan.

Although the Hungarian language is currently widely acknowledged scientifically and by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences as a member of the Uralic language family, there is a history of other theories from before and after the Uralic connection was established, as well as some fringe theories that continue to deny the connection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Estonians in Abkhazia</span> Ethnic group in Abkhazia

Estonians in Abkhazia are a minority residing in Abkhazia, recognized worldwide as an autonomous region of Georgia but de facto an independent country. Estonians began to emigrate to Abkhazia when the region became part of the Russian Empire and many Abkhazians left or were expelled. The tsarist regime began to repopulate the area with its Christian subjects, including Estonians. There were numerous waves of migration from Estonia to Abkhazia, where the peasants were promised land. Among others, they founded the villages of Sulevi and Salme in the west and Alam-Linda, Ülem-Linda and Estonka near Sukhumi. In the villages, the Estonians also had their own schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karl August Hermann</span> Estonian journalist and composer

Karl August Hermann was an Estonian writer, publicist, linguist and composer.

Tiiu Erelt is an Estonian linguist.

Paul Alvre was an Estonian linguist.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Künnap, Ago (September 2010). "Review of Gāo (2008) Chinese Language and Languages of Northern Europe: Discoveries and Researches of Common Origins of Chinese, Uralic and Indo-European Languages" (PDF). Linguistica Uralica. 46 (3): 218–222. ProQuest   852514464.
  2. 1 2 Jaan Kaplinski (2014). "Veel mõni mõtteke etümoloogiasõnaraamatust ja etümoloogiatest" [A few more thoughts about the etymology dictionary and etymologies]. Keel ja Kirjandus (in Estonian). 2014 (3). Retrieved 2022-11-15.
  3. ↑ Jingyi Gao (2015-01-30). "Jingyi Gao: hiina ja soome-ugri keelte ühisest päritolust". ERR (in Estonian). Retrieved 2022-12-02.
  4. 1 2 Kumar, Niraj; van Driem, George; Stobdan, Phunchok (2020-11-18). Himalayan Bridge. Routledge. p. 51. ISBN   978-1-000-21549-6.
  5. ↑ "Soome-ugri keelepuul on juured muistses Kesk-Hiinas". elu.ohtuleht.ee (in Estonian). Retrieved 2022-11-26.
  6. 1 2 Jingyi Gao; Tender, Tõnu (2020). "Sino-Uralic Etymology for 'Moon, Month' Supported by Regular Sound Correspondences". Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies. 8 (1): 60–68. doi:10.24411/2310-2144-2020-00005.
  7. ↑ Jingyi Gao (2020). "Sino-Uralic Etymology for 'Jupiter, Year' Supported by Rhyme Correspondence". Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies. 8 (1): 1–11. doi:10.24411/2310-2144-2020-00002.
  8. 1 2 Harms, Robert Thomas (10 April 2024). "Uralic languages". Encyclopedia Britannica .
  9. ↑ Künnap, Ago (2009). "Eesti keel koos teiste läänemeresoome keeltega ja germaani. keeled Hiinast vaadatuna" (PDF). Keeljakirjandus.eki.ee.
  10. ↑ "Soome-ugri keelepuul on juured muistses Kesk-Hiinas". elu.ohtuleht.ee (in Estonian). Retrieved 2022-11-29.
  11. 1 2 Hermann, Karl August (2019). "Hiina keele sugulusest ugri keelte ja eriti soome-eesti keelega (1895)". Eesti ja Soome-Ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics. 10 (2): 59–67. doi: 10.12697/jeful.2019.10.2.04 . S2CID   212794124.
  12. 1 2 Gao, Jingyi (2019-12-31). "Karl August Hermanni hiina-soome-eesti keelevõrdlus ning kehtivad ja kehtetud etümoloogiad parandustega". Eesti ja Soome-Ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics. 10 (2): 45–58. doi: 10.12697/jeful.2019.10.2.03 . ISSN   2228-1339. S2CID   213240827.
  13. ↑ Scholars in Action (2 vols): The Practice of Knowledge and the Figure of the Savant in the 18th Century. BRILL. 2013-04-15. ISBN   978-90-04-24391-0.
  14. ↑ "Soome-ugri sõlmed 2012". Apollo (in Estonian). Retrieved 2022-12-23.
  15. ↑ Üve Maloverjan, ed. (2012). Soome-ugri sõlmed 2010–2011 [Finnish-Ugric nodes 2010-2011] (in Estonian). Fenno-Ugria. Sajnovics tõstatas ka küsimuse ungari keele sugulusest hiina keelega.[Sajnovics also raised the question of the relationship of the Hungarian language with the Chinese language.]
  16. ↑ Hermann, Karl August (1895). "Ueber die Verwandschaft des Chinesischen mit den ugrischen Sprachen und insbesondere, mit dem Finnisch-Estnischen". Sitzungsberichte der Gelehrten Estnischen Gesellschaft zu Dorpat 1894 (in German). Dorpat : [Gelehrte Estnische Gesellschaft zu Dorpat]: 167–180. JSTOR   community.32951318.
  17. ↑ Gao, Jingyi (2008). 《汉语与北欧语言：汉语与乌拉尔语言及印欧语言同源探究》Hàn-yǔ yǔ Wū-lā-ěr yǔ-yán jì Yìn-Ōu yǔ-yán tóng-yuán tàn-jiū 'Chinese Language and Languages of Northern Europe: Discoveries and Researches of the Common Sources of Chinese, Uralic, and Indo-European Languages'. Beijing: 中国社会科学出版社 ‘China Social Sciences Press’. ISBN   978-7500470779.
  18. ↑ Gao, Jingyi (2005). Comparison of Swadesh 100 Words in Finnic, Hungarian, Sinic and Tibetan: Introduction to Finno-Sinic Languages. Tallinn: Estonian Language Foundation. ISBN   9985791355.
  19. ↑ "Üllatav avastus: oleme pärit Hiinast". Maaleht (in Estonian). Retrieved 2022-11-15.
  20. ↑ "Eesti ja hiina keel pärinevad ühest allikast". Tartu+ (in Estonian). 2009-03-10. Retrieved 2022-11-26.
  21. ↑ 蒋, 冀骋; 曾, 晓渝; 杨, 军; 洪, 波; 周, 赛华; 张, 富海 (2021). "音韵学研究现状与展望". 《语言科学》. 20 (2021) (5): 474–490.
  22. ↑ 冯, 蒸 (2008). "评高晶一所著汉宋乌拉尔语系语言语系绪论". 汉字文化. 2008 (1): 57–59.
  23. ↑ 李, 葆嘉 (2010). "亲缘比较语言学：超级语系建构中的华夏汉语位置". 《研究之乐：庆祝王士元先生七十五寿辰学术论文集》, 潘悟云, 沈钟伟主编. 上海: 上海教育出版社: 164–193.
  24. ↑ Driem, George van (2022-09-12). Languages of the Himalayas: Volume 2. BRILL. ISBN   978-90-04-51492-8.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.