East Asian languages

Last updated
East Asian
(proposed, under study)
Geographic
distribution		 East Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Oceania, Madagascar
Linguistic classification Proposed language family
Subdivisions
Glottolog None

The East Asian languages are a language family (alternatively macrofamily or superphylum) proposed by Stanley Starosta in 2001. The proposal has since been adopted by George van Driem and others.

Contents

Classifications

Early proposals

Early proposals of similar linguistic macrophylla, in narrower scope: [1]

Precursors to the East Asian proposal:

Starosta (2005)

Location of the Peiligang culture Peiligang map.svg
Location of the Peiligang culture

Stanley Starosta's (2005) [16] East Asian proposal includes a "Yangzian" branch, consisting of Austroasiatic and Hmong–Mien, to form an East Asian superphylum. However, Starosta believes his proposed Yangzian to be a direct sister of Sino-Tibetan rather than Austronesian, which is more distantly related to Sino-Tibetan as a sister of Sino-Tibetan-Yangzian. He concludes Proto-East Asian was a disyllabic (CVCVC) language spoken from 6,500 to 6,000 BCE by Peiligang culture and Cishan culture millet farmers on the North China Plain (specifically the Han River, Wei River, and central Yellow River areas). [17]

Starosta (2005) proposes the following Proto-East Asian morphological affixes, which are found in Proto-Tibeto-Burman and Proto-Austronesian, as well as in some morphologically conservative Austroasiatic branches such as Nicobaric. [18]

van Driem (2012)

The following tree of East Asian superphylum (macrofamily) was proposed by George van Driem in 2012 at the 18th Himalayan Languages Symposium, held at the Benares Hindu University. [1] [19]

Modern distribution of basal O-M175, which expanded from southern China and Mainland Southeast Asia. Geographic distributions of Y chromosome haplogroups O in East Asia.png
Modern distribution of basal O-M175, which expanded from southern China and Mainland Southeast Asia.

According to van Driem, the linguistic evidence for the East Asian languages matches the genetic evidence from Y-DNA Haplogroup O. [20] (Further information: Father Tongue hypothesis)

Larish (2006, 2017)

According to Michael D. Larish, the languages of Southeast and East Asia descended from one proto-language (which he calls "Proto-Asian"). Japonic is grouped together with Koreanic as one branch of the Proto-Asian family. The other branch consists of the Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Kra-Dai, Hmong-Mien and Sino-Tibetan languages. [21] [22]

Vocabulary comparison

Below is a comparison of basic vocabulary items for proto-languages of all 5 East Asian language families.

Sources
Sino-TibetanHmong-MienAustroasiaticAustronesianKra-Dai
gloss Proto-Tibeto-Burman Proto-Hmong-Mien Proto-Austroasiatic Proto-Austronesian Proto-Tai Proto-Hlai Proto-Kra
hair*(t)sam*pljei*sukˀ, *sɔkˀ*bukeS*prɤmA*hnom*m-səmA
eye*s-myak*mu̯ɛjH*matˀ*maCa*p.taːA*tʃʰaː*m-ʈaA
ear*r/g-na*mbræu*Ctoːr*Caliŋa*krwɯːA*ljəy*k-raA
nose*s-na ~ *s-naːr*mbruiH*muːh, *muːɕ*ujuŋ*ɗaŋA*kʰət*hŋətD
tooth*s/p-wa*hmjinʔ*muɲ, *məɲ*lipen, *n/ŋipen*wanA*fjən*l-pənA
tongue*m/s-lay ~ *s-ley*mblet*lntaːkˀ*Sema, *lidam*liːnC*hliːnʔ*l-maA
hand*lak ~ *C-yak*-bɔuʔ*tiːˀ*kamay*mwɯːA*C-mɯː*mjaA
bone*s/m/g-rus*tshuŋʔ*cʔaːŋ*CuqelaN*C̥.dukD*Cuɾɯːk*dəkD
blood*s-hywəy-t*ntshjamʔ*(m)ɕaːm*daRaq*lɯətD*alaːc*platD
liver*m-sin*-hri̯ən*kləːm; [26] *gre(ː)ɕ*qaCay*tapD*ɗəy*təpD
meat, flesh*sya-nP-Mienic *ʔaB*sacˀ*Sesi*n.mɤːC*rəmʔ*ʔaɯC
dog*d-kʷəy-nP-Hmongic *hmaŋC*cɔʔ*asu*ʰmaːA*hmaː*x-maA
bird*s-ŋak*m-nɔk*ciːm*manuk*C̬.nokD*səc*ɳokD
fish*s-ŋya*mbrəuʔ*kaʔ*Sikan*plaːA*hlaː*p-laA
louse*s-r(y)ik*ntshjeiʔ*ciʔ*kuCux*trawA*tʃʰwəw*C-ʈuA
leaf*layP-Hmongic *mblɔŋA,
P-Mienic *nɔmA		*slaʔ*waSaw*ɓaɰA*ɓɯː*ɖiŋA
sun, day*s-nəyP-Mienic *hnu̯ɔiA*tŋiːˀ*waRi, *qajaw*ŋwanA*hŋwən*(l-/h)wənA
moon*s/g-la*hlaH*khe(ː)ʔ*bulaN, *qiNaS*ɓlɯənA*C-ɲaːn*(C-)tjanA
water*m-t(w)əy-n ~ *m-ti-s*ʔu̯əm*ɗaːkˀ; Pal. *ʔoːm*daNum*C̬.namC*C-nəmʔ*ʔuŋC
rain*r/s/g-waP-Hmongic *m-noŋC*gmaːˀ*quzaN*C̥.wɯnA*fun*jəlA
fire*mey*douʔ*ʔuːɕ*Sapuy*wɤjA*fiː*puiA
name*r-mi(ŋ/n)*mpɔuH*ɟmuh, *ɟmɨh*ŋajan*ɟɤːB*pʰaːŋ*n(ʒ)iA
eat*m-dz(y)a-k/n/t/sP-Mienic *ɲənC*ca(ː)ʔ*kaen*kɯɲA*kʰən*kanA
die*səy*dəjH*kceːt [26] *ma-aCay*p.taːjA*hlaːwɦ*pɣonA
I*ŋa-y ~ *kaP-Hmongic *kɛŋB*ʔaɲ-ku*kuːA*ɦuː*kuA
you (sg.)*na-ŋ*mu̯ei*miːˀ, *meːˀ-mu*mɯŋA*C-mɯː*məA/B

Distributions

See also

Notes and references

  1. 1 2 van Driem, George. 2013. "East Asian ethnolinguistic phylogeography [usurped] ", Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 7 (1): 135-188.
  2. ↑ Conrady, August. 1916. Eine merkw rdige Beziehung zwischen den austrischen und den indochinesischen Sprachen. Aufsätze zur Kultur- und Sprachgeschichte vornehmlich des Orients: Ernst Kuhn zum 70. Geburtstage am 7. Februar 1916 gewidmet von Freunden und Schülern, 475-504. München: Verlag von M. & H. Marcus.
  3. ↑ Conrady, August. 1922. Neue austrisch-indochinesische Parallelen. Asia Major: Hirth Anniversary Volume, 23-66. London: Robsthan and Company.
  4. ↑ Wulff, Kurt. 1934. Chinesisch und Tai: Sprachvergleichende Untersuchungen. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.
  5. ↑ Wulff, Kurt. 1942 [posthumous]. Über das Verhältnis des Malay-Polynesischen zum Indochinesischen. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
  6. ↑ Benedict, Paul King. 1942. Thai, Kadai and Indonesia: A new alignment in southeastern Asia. American Anthropologist 44:576-601.
  7. ↑ Blust, Robert. 1996. Beyond the Austronesian homeland: The Austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology. Prehistoric Settlement of the Pacific, ed. by Ward H. Goodenough, 117-160. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
  8. ↑ Peiros, Ilia. 1998. Comparative Linguistics in Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
  9. ↑ Schlegel, Gustave. 1901. Review: ‘Elements of Siamese Grammar by O. Frankfurter, Ph.D., Bangkok: Printed at the American Presbyterian Mission Press, Leipzig, Karl W. Hiersemann, 1900’. T'oung Pao (Série II), II:76-87.
  10. ↑ Schlegel, Gustave. 1902. Siamese Studies. T'oung Pao, New Series II, Volume II, Supplement. Leiden.
  11. ↑ Ostapirat, Weera. 2005. Kra-Dai and Austronesian: Notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution. The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, ed. by Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench and Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, 107-131. London: Routledge Curzon.
  12. ↑ Ostapirat, Weera. 2013. Austro-Tai revisited. 23rd Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 29 May 2013.
  13. ↑ Schmidt, Wilhelm. 1906. Die Mon-Khmer Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zentral-Asiens und Austronesiens. Archiv für Anthropologie Neue Folge V:59-109.
  14. ↑ Reid, Lawrence A. 1994. Morphological evidence for Austric. Oceanic Linguistics 33.2:323-344.
  15. ↑ Reid, Lawrence A. 2005. The current status of Austric: a review and evaluation of the lexical and morphosyntactic evidence. The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, ed. by Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench and Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, 132-160. London: Routledge Curzon, London.
  16. ↑ Since Starosta died on July 18, 2002, his paper, originally written in 2001, was published posthumously.
  17. ↑ Starosta, Stanley (2005). "Proto-East Asian and the origin and dispersal of languages of east and southeast Asia and the Pacific". In Sagart, Laurent; Blench, Roger; Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia (eds.). The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics . London: Routledge Curzon. pp.  182–197. ISBN   978-0-415-32242-3.
  18. ↑ Reid, Lawrence A. (1994). "Morphological evidence for Austric" (PDF). Oceanic Linguistics. 33 (2): 323–344. doi:10.2307/3623132. hdl: 10125/32987 . JSTOR   i285831. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-15. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  19. ↑ van Driem, George. 2016. "The Eastern Himalayan corridor in prehistory [usurped] ", pp. 467-524, Vol. II in Elena Nikolaevna Kolpačkova, ed., Проблемы китайского и общего языкознания — Problems in Chinese and General Linguistics. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Studija « NP-Print ».
  20. ↑ van Driem, George. 2018. "The East Asian linguistic phylum: A reconstruction based on language and genes [usurped] ", Journal of the Asiatic Society, LX (4): 1-38.
  21. ↑ Larish, Michael D. (January 2006). Possible Proto-Asian Archaic Residue and the Statigraphy of Diffusional Cumulation in Austro-Asian Languages (PDF). Tenth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-01-08. Retrieved 2019-01-07.
  22. ↑ Larish, Michael. 2017. Proto-Asian and its branches: An archeolinguistic approach for the history of Eastern Asia. Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
  23. ↑ Matisoff, James A. 2015. The Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Archived 2020-10-23 at the Wayback Machine . Berkeley: University of California. (PDF Archived 2020-02-02 at the Wayback Machine )
  24. ↑ Ratliff, Martha. 2010. Hmong–Mien language history. Canberra, Australia: Pacific Linguistics. ISBN   0-85883-615-7.
  25. ↑ Sidwell, Paul (2024). "500 Proto Austroasiatic Etyma: Version 1.0". Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. 17 (1). Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press: i–xxxiii. ISSN   1836-6821 . Retrieved 2024-06-15.
  26. 1 2 3 Sidwell, Paul and Felix Rau (2015). "Austroasiatic Comparative-Historical Reconstruction: An Overview." In Jenny, Mathias and Paul Sidwell, eds (2015). The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages. Leiden: Brill.
  27. ↑ Blust, Robert; Trussel, Stephen (June 21, 2020). "Austronesian Comparative Dictionary, web edition". Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  28. ↑ Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2009. The Phonology of Proto-Tai. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
  29. ↑ Norquest, Peter K. 2007. A Phonological Reconstruction of Proto-Hlai Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine . Ph.D. dissertation. Tucson: Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona.
  30. ↑ Ostapirat, Weera. 2000. "Proto-Kra Archived 2020-11-12 at the Wayback Machine ." Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area23 (1): 1-251.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Austroasiatic languages</span> Language family concentrated in Southeast Asia

The Austroasiatic languages are a large language family spoken throughout Mainland Southeast Asia, South Asia and East Asia. These languages are natively spoken by the majority of the population in Vietnam and Cambodia, and by minority populations scattered throughout parts of Thailand, Laos, India, Myanmar, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Nepal, and southern China. Approximately 117 million people speak an Austroasiatic language, of which more than two-thirds are Vietnamese speakers. Of the Austroasiatic languages, only Vietnamese, Khmer, and Mon have lengthy, established presences in the historical record. Only two are presently considered to be the national languages of sovereign states: Vietnamese in Vietnam, and Khmer in Cambodia. The Mon language is a recognized indigenous language in Myanmar and Thailand, while the Wa language is a "recognized national language" in the de facto autonomous Wa State within Myanmar. Santali is one of the 22 scheduled languages of India. The remainder of the family's languages are spoken by minority groups and have no official status.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Tibetan languages</span> Language family native to Asia

Sino-Tibetan, also cited as Trans-Himalayan in a few sources, is a family of more than 400 languages, second only to Indo-European in number of native speakers. Around 1.4 billion people speak a Sino-Tibetan language. The vast majority of these are the 1.3 billion native speakers of Sinitic languages. Other Sino-Tibetan languages with large numbers of speakers include Burmese and the Tibetic languages. The four UN member states China, Singapore, Myanmar, and Bhutan have a Sino-Tibetan language as their main native language. Other languages of the family are spoken in the Himalayas, the Southeast Asian Massif, and the eastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. Most of these have small speech communities in remote mountain areas, and as such are poorly documented.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kra–Dai languages</span> Language family of mainland Southeast Asia

The Kra–Dai languages, are a language family in mainland Southeast Asia, southern China, and northeastern India. All languages in the family are tonal, including Thai and Lao, the national languages of Thailand and Laos, respectively. Around 93 million people speak Kra–Dai languages; 60% of those speak Thai. Ethnologue lists 95 languages in the family, with 62 of these being in the Tai branch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Austronesian languages</span> Large language family mostly of Southeast Asia and the Pacific

The Austronesian languages are a language family widely spoken throughout Maritime Southeast Asia, parts of Mainland Southeast Asia, Madagascar, the islands of the Pacific Ocean and Taiwan. They are spoken by about 328 million people. This makes it the fifth-largest language family by number of speakers. Major Austronesian languages include Malay, Javanese, Sundanese, Tagalog, Malagasy and Cebuano. According to some estimates, the family contains 1,257 languages, which is the second most of any language family.

The languages of East Asia belong to several distinct language families, with many common features attributed to interaction. In the Mainland Southeast Asia linguistic area, Chinese varieties and languages of southeast Asia share many areal features, tending to be analytic languages with similar syllable and tone structure. In the 1st millennium AD, Chinese culture came to dominate East Asia, and Classical Chinese was adopted by scholars and ruling classes in Vietnam, Korea, and Japan. As a consequence, there was a massive influx of loanwords from Chinese vocabulary into these and other neighboring Asian languages. The Chinese script was also adapted to write Vietnamese, Korean and Japanese, though in the first two the use of Chinese characters is now restricted to university learning, linguistic or historical study, artistic or decorative works and newspapers, rather than daily usage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hmong–Mien languages</span> Language family of south China and Southeast Asia

The Hmong–Mien languages are a highly tonal language family of southern China and northern Southeast Asia. They are spoken in mountainous areas of southern China, including Guizhou, Hunan, Yunnan, Sichuan, Guangxi, Guangdong and Hubei provinces; the speakers of these languages are predominantly "hill people", in contrast to the neighboring Han Chinese, who have settled the more fertile river valleys.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Austric languages</span> Hypothetical parent family of the Austroasiatic and Austronesian languages

The Austric languages are a proposed language family that includes the Austronesian languages spoken in Taiwan, Maritime Southeast Asia, the Pacific Islands, and Madagascar, as well as Kra–Dai and Austroasiatic languages spoken in Mainland Southeast Asia and South Asia. A genetic relationship between these language families is seen as plausible by some scholars, but remains unproven.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Borean languages</span> Proposed language family

Borean is a hypothetical linguistic macrofamily that encompasses almost all language families worldwide except those native to the Americas, Africa, Oceania, and the Andaman Islands. Its supporters propose that the various languages spoken in Eurasia and adjacent regions have a genealogical relationship, and ultimately descend from languages spoken during the Upper Paleolithic in the millennia following the Last Glacial Maximum. The name Borean is based on the Greek βορέας, and means "northern". This reflects the fact that the group is held to include most language families that are native to the northern hemisphere. Two distinct models of Borean exist: that of Harold C. Fleming and that of Sergei Starostin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Austro-Tai languages</span> Proposed language family

The Austro-Tai languages, sometimes also Austro-Thai languages, are a proposed language family that comprises the Austronesian languages and Kra–Dai languages.

The Kra languages are a branch of the Kra–Dai language family spoken in southern China and in northern Vietnam.

Sino-Austronesian or Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian is a proposed language family suggested by Laurent Sagart in 1990. Using reconstructions of Old Chinese, Sagart argued that the Austronesian languages are related to the Sinitic languages phonologically, lexically and morphologically. Sagart later accepted the Sino-Tibetan languages as a valid group and extended his proposal to include the rest of Sino-Tibetan. He also placed the Tai–Kadai languages within the Austronesian family as a sister branch of Malayo-Polynesian. The proposal has been largely rejected by other linguists who argue that the similarities between Austronesian and Sino-Tibetan more likely arose from contact rather than being genetic.

Proto-Austroasiatic is the reconstructed ancestor of the Austroasiatic languages. Proto-Mon–Khmer has been reconstructed in Harry L. Shorto's Mon–Khmer Comparative Dictionary, while a new Proto-Austroasiatic reconstruction is currently being undertaken by Paul Sidwell.

There have been various classification schemes for Southeast Asian languages.

Proto-Hmong–Mien (PHM), also known as Proto-Miao–Yao, is the reconstructed ancestor of the Hmong–Mien languages. Lower-level reconstructions include Proto-Hmongic and Proto-Mienic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tai peoples</span> Descendants of speakers of a common Tai language

Tai peoples are the populations who speak the Tai languages. There are a total of about 93 million people of Tai ancestry worldwide, with the largest ethnic groups being Dai, Thai, Isan, Tai Yai (Shan), Tai Lai (Shanni), Lao, Tai Ahom and some Northern Thai peoples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mainland Southeast Asia linguistic area</span> Geolinguistic region sharing areal features such as tonality

The Mainland Southeast Asia linguistic area is a sprachbund including languages of the Sino-Tibetan, Hmong–Mien, Kra–Dai, Austronesian and Austroasiatic families spoken in an area stretching from Thailand to China. Neighbouring languages across these families, though presumed unrelated, often have similar typological features, which are believed to have spread by diffusion. James Matisoff referred to this area as the "Sinosphere", contrasted with the "Indosphere", but viewed it as a zone of mutual influence in the ancient period.

Proto-Kra–Dai is the proposed reconstructed ancestor of the Kra–Dai languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ilia Peiros</span> Russian linguist (born 1948)

Ilia Peiros is a Russian linguist who specializes in the historical linguistics of East Asia. Peiros is a well-known scholar in the Moscow School of Comparative Linguistics, known for its work on long-range comparative linguistics. Peiros is affiliated with the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico, United States and was also a former faculty member at the University of Melbourne.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.