Turkic languages

Last updated

Turkic
Ethnicity Turkic peoples
Geographic
distribution
Eurasia
Native speakers
c.200 million (2020) [1]
Linguistic classification One of the world's primary language families
Proto-language Proto-Turkic
Subdivisions
ISO 639-5 trk
Glottolog turk1311
Turkic Languages distribution map.png
The distribution of the Turkic languages

The Turkic languages are a language family of more than 35 [2] documented languages, spoken by the Turkic peoples of Eurasia from Eastern Europe and Southern Europe to Central Asia, East Asia, North Asia (Siberia), and West Asia. The Turkic languages originated in a region of East Asia spanning from Mongolia to Northwest China, where Proto-Turkic is thought to have been spoken, [3] from where they expanded to Central Asia and farther west during the first millennium. [4] They are characterized as a dialect continuum. [5]

Contents

Turkic languages are spoken by some 200 million people. [1] The Turkic language with the greatest number of speakers is Turkish, spoken mainly in Anatolia and the Balkans; its native speakers account for about 38% of all Turkic speakers, followed by Uzbek. [4]

Characteristic features such as vowel harmony, agglutination, subject-object-verb order, and lack of grammatical gender, are almost universal within the Turkic family. [4] There is a high degree of mutual intelligibility, upon moderate exposure, among the various Oghuz languages, which include Turkish, Azerbaijani, Turkmen, Qashqai, Chaharmahali Turkic, Gagauz, and Balkan Gagauz Turkish, as well as Oghuz-influenced Crimean Tatar. [6] Other Turkic languages demonstrate varying amounts of mutual intelligibility within their subgroups as well. Although methods of classification vary, the Turkic languages are usually considered to be divided into two branches: Oghur, the only surviving member of which is Chuvash, and Common Turkic, which includes all other Turkic languages.

Turkic languages show many similarities with the Mongolic, Tungusic, Koreanic, and Japonic languages. These similarities have led some linguists (including Talât Tekin) to propose an Altaic language family, though this proposal is widely rejected by historical linguists. [7] [8] Similarities with the Uralic languages even caused these families to be regarded as one for a long time under the Ural-Altaic hypothesis. [9] [10] [11] However, there has not been sufficient evidence to conclude the existence of either of these macrofamilies. The shared characteristics between the languages are attributed presently to extensive prehistoric language contact.

Characteristics

Map showing countries and autonomous subdivisions where a language belonging to the Turkic language family has official status Map-TurkicLanguages.png
Map showing countries and autonomous subdivisions where a language belonging to the Turkic language family has official status

Turkic languages are null-subject languages, have vowel harmony (with the notable exception of Uzbek due to strong Persian-Tajik influence), converbs, extensive agglutination by means of suffixes and postpositions, and lack of grammatical articles, noun classes, and grammatical gender. Subject–object–verb word order is universal within the family. In terms of the level of vowel harmony in the Turkic language family, Tuvan is characterized as almost fully harmonic whereas Uzbek is the least harmonic or not harmonic at all. Taking into account the documented historico-linguistic development of Turkic languages overall, both inscriptional and textual, the family provides over one millennium of documented stages as well as scenarios in the linguistic evolution of vowel harmony which, in turn, demonstrates harmony evolution along a confidently definable trajectory [12] Though vowel harmony is a common characteristic of major language families spoken in Inner Eurasia (Mongolic, Tungusic, Uralic and Turkic), the type of harmony found in them differs from each other, specifically, Uralic and Turkic have a shared type of vowel harmony (called palatal vowel harmony) whereas Mongolic and Tungusic represent a different type.

History

Pre-history

The homeland of the Turkic peoples and their language is suggested to be somewhere between the Transcaspian steppe and Northeastern Asia (Manchuria), [13] with genetic evidence pointing to the region near South Siberia and Mongolia as the "Inner Asian Homeland" of the Turkic ethnicity. [14] Similarly several linguists, including Juha Janhunen, Roger Blench and Matthew Spriggs, suggest that modern-day Mongolia is the homeland of the early Turkic language. [15] Relying on Proto-Turkic lexical items about the climate, topography, flora, fauna, people's modes of subsistence, Turkologist Peter Benjamin Golden locates the Proto-Turkic Urheimat in the southern, taiga-steppe zone of the Sayan-Altay region. [16]

Extensive contact took place between Proto-Turks and Proto-Mongols approximately during the first millennium BC; the shared cultural tradition between the two Eurasian nomadic groups is called the "Turco-Mongol" tradition. The two groups shared a similar religion system, Tengrism, and there exists a multitude of evident loanwords between Turkic languages and Mongolic languages. Although the loans were bidirectional, today Turkic loanwords constitute the largest foreign component in Mongolian vocabulary. [17]

Italian historian and philologist Igor de Rachewiltz noted a significant distinction of the Chuvash language from other Turkic languages. According to him, the Chuvash language does not share certain common characteristics with Turkic languages to such a degree that some scholars consider it an independent Onoguric (Bulgharic) family similar to Uralic and Turkic languages. Turkic classification of Chuvash was seen as a compromise solution for the classification purposes. [18]

Some lexical and extensive typological similarities between Turkic and the nearby Tungusic and Mongolic families, as well as the Korean and Japonic families has in more recent years been instead attributed to prehistoric contact amongst the group, sometimes referred to as the Northeast Asian sprachbund. A more recent (circa first millennium BC) contact between "core Altaic" (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic) is distinguished from this, due to the existence of definitive common words that appear to have been mostly borrowed from Turkic into Mongolic, and later from Mongolic into Tungusic, as Turkic borrowings into Mongolic significantly outnumber Mongolic borrowings into Turkic, and Turkic and Tungusic do not share any words that do not also exist in Mongolic.

Old Turkic Kul-chur inscription with the Old Turkic alphabet (c. 8th century). Tov Province, Mongolia Kuli Chur inscription.jpg
Old Turkic Kul-chur inscription with the Old Turkic alphabet (c.8th century). Töv Province, Mongolia

Turkic languages also show some Chinese loanwords that point to early contact during the time of Proto-Turkic. [19]

Early written records

The 10th-century Irk Bitig ("Book of Divination") from Dunhuang, written in Old Uyghur language with the Orkhon script, is an important literary source for early Turko-Mongol mythology. Irk bitig 07.jpg
The 10th-century Irk Bitig ("Book of Divination") from Dunhuang, written in Old Uyghur language with the Orkhon script, is an important literary source for early Turko-Mongol mythology.

The first established records of the Turkic languages are the eighth century AD Orkhon inscriptions by the Göktürks, recording the Old Turkic language, which were discovered in 1889 in the Orkhon Valley in Mongolia. The Compendium of the Turkic Dialects ( Divânü Lügati't-Türk ), written during the 11th century AD by Kaşgarlı Mahmud of the Kara-Khanid Khanate, constitutes an early linguistic treatment of the family. The Compendium is the first comprehensive dictionary of the Turkic languages and also includes the first known map of the Turkic speakers' geographical distribution. It mainly pertains to the Southwestern branch of the family. [20]

The Codex Cumanicus (12th–13th centuries AD) concerning the Northwestern branch is another early linguistic manual, between the Kipchak language and Latin, used by the Catholic missionaries sent to the Western Cumans inhabiting a region corresponding to present-day Hungary and Romania. The earliest records of the language spoken by Volga Bulgars, the parent to today's Chuvash language, are dated to the 13th–14th centuries AD.

Geographical expansion and development

Yuan dynasty Buddhist inscription written in Old Uyghur language with Old Uyghur alphabet on the east wall of the Cloud Platform at Juyong Pass Yuntai Uyghur east wall.jpg
Yuan dynasty Buddhist inscription written in Old Uyghur language with Old Uyghur alphabet on the east wall of the Cloud Platform at Juyong Pass

With the Turkic expansion during the Early Middle Ages (c. 6th–11th centuries AD), Turkic languages, in the course of just a few centuries, spread across Central Asia, from Siberia to the Mediterranean. Various terminologies from the Turkic languages have passed into Persian, Urdu, Ukrainian, Russian, [21] Chinese, Mongolian, Hungarian and to a lesser extent, Arabic. [22] [ verification needed ]

The geographical distribution of Turkic-speaking peoples across Eurasia since the Ottoman era ranges from the North-East of Siberia to Turkey in the West. [23] (See picture in the box on the right above.)

For centuries, the Turkic-speaking peoples have migrated extensively and intermingled continuously, and their languages have been influenced mutually and through contact with the surrounding languages, especially the Iranian, Slavic, and Mongolic languages. [24]

This has obscured the historical developments within each language and/or language group, and as a result, there exist several systems to classify the Turkic languages. The modern genetic classification schemes for Turkic are still largely indebted to Samoilovich (1922).[ citation needed ]

The Turkic languages may be divided into six branches: [25]

In this classification, Oghur Turkic is also referred to as Lir-Turkic, and the other branches are subsumed under the title of Shaz-Turkic or Common Turkic. It is not clear when these two major types of Turkic can be assumed to have diverged. [26]

With less certainty, the Southwestern, Northwestern, Southeastern and Oghur groups may further be summarized as West Turkic, the Northeastern, Kyrgyz-Kipchak, and Arghu (Khalaj) groups as East Turkic. [27]

Geographically and linguistically, the languages of the Northwestern and Southeastern subgroups belong to the central Turkic languages, while the Northeastern and Khalaj languages are the so-called peripheral languages.

Hruschka, et al. (2014) [28] use computational phylogenetic methods to calculate a tree of Turkic based on phonological sound changes.

A classification scheme of all the Turkic languages LinguisticDiagramTurkic.png
A classification scheme of all the Turkic languages

Schema

The following isoglosses are traditionally used in the classification of the Turkic languages: [29] [25]

Additional isoglosses include:

isogloss Old Turkic Turkish Turkmen Azerbaijani Qashqai Uzbek Uyghur Tatar Kazakh Kyrgyz Altay Western Yugur Fu-yü Gyrgys Khakas Tuvan Sakha/Yakut Khalaj Chuvash
z/r (nine)toquzdokuzdokuzdoqquzdoqquztoʻqqiztoqquztuɣïztoğyztoɣuztoɣusdohghusdoɣustoɣïstostoɣustoqquztăχăr
*h- (foot)adaqayakaýakayaqayaqoyoqayaqayaqaiaqayaqayaqazaqazïχazaχadaqataχhadaqura
*VdV (foot)adaqayakaýakayaqayaqoyoqayaqayaqaiaqayaqayaqazaqazïχazaχadaqataχhadaqura
*-ɣ (mountain)tāɣdağ*dagdağdaɣtogʻtaghtawtautaɣdaχtaɣdaɣtıatāɣtu
suffix *-lïɣ (mountainous)tāɣlïɣdağlıdaglydağlıdaɣlïɣtogʻliktaghliqtawlïtaulytōlūtūlutaɣliɣdaɣluɣχayalaaχtullă

*In the standard Istanbul dialect of Turkish, the ğ in dağ and dağlı is not realized as a consonant, but as a slight lengthening of the preceding vowel.

Members

The following table is based mainly upon the classification scheme presented by Lars Johanson. [32] [33]

Proto-Turkic Common Turkic Southwestern Common Turkic
(Oghuz)

Oghuz Turkic Languages distribution map.png

 
West Oghuz
East Oghuz
South Oghuz
(Arghu)

Khalaj Turkic Language distribution map.png

 
Northwestern Common Turkic
(Kipchak)

Kipchak Map Labeled.png

West Kipchak
North Kipchak
(Volga–Ural Turkic)
South Kipchak
(Aralo-Caspian)
Eastern Kipchak [33]
(Kyrgyz–Kipchak) [38] [39] [40] [lower-alpha 1]
Southeastern Common Turkic
(Karluk)

Karluk Turkic Languages distribution map.png

West Karluk
East Karluk
Northeastern Common Turkic
(Siberian)

Siberian Turkic Languages distribution map.png

North Siberian
South Siberian [lower-alpha 4] Sayan Turkic
Altai and Yenisei Turkic
Oghuric

Chuvash Turkic Language distribution map.png

Vocabulary comparison

The following is a brief comparison of cognates among the basic vocabulary across the Turkic language family (about 60 words). Despite being cognates, some of the words may denote a different meaning.

Empty cells do not necessarily imply that a particular language is lacking a word to describe the concept, but rather that the word for the concept in that language may be formed from another stem and is not cognate with the other words in the row or that a loanword is used in its place.

Also, there may be shifts in the meaning from one language to another, and so the "Common meaning" given is only approximate. In some cases, the form given is found only in some dialects of the language, or a loanword is much more common (e.g. in Turkish, the preferred word for "fire" is the Persian-derived ateş, whereas the native od is dead). Forms are given in native Latin orthographies unless otherwise noted.

Common meaning Proto-Turkic Old Turkic Turkish Azerbaijani Karakhanid Qashqai Turkmen Tatar Karaim Bashkir Kazakh Kyrgyz Uzbek Uyghur Sakha/Yakut Chuvash
Relationship
father, ancestor*ata, *kaŋata, apa, qaŋbaba, atababa, ataapa, atabowa/ataataata, atay [lower-alpha 7] ataata, atay [lower-alpha 8] ataataotaata [lower-alpha 9] ağa [lower-alpha 10] atte, aśu, aşşĕ [lower-alpha 11]
mother*ana, *ögana, ögana, anneanaana, eneana/nänäeneana, äni [lower-alpha 12] anaana, inä(y)/asay [lower-alpha 13] anaene, ana [lower-alpha 14] ona, achaana [lower-alpha 15] iỹe [lower-alpha 16] anne, annü, amăşĕ [lower-alpha 17]
son*oguloɣuloğuloğuloɣul, ohuloğulogulul [lower-alpha 18] uvululul [lower-alpha 19] uul [lower-alpha 20] oʻgʻiloghul [lower-alpha 21] uol [lower-alpha 22] ıvăl, ul [lower-alpha 23]
man*ēr, *érkekererkekər/erkəkerkekkišierkekir [lower-alpha 24] ėrir, irkäk [lower-alpha 25] er, erkek [lower-alpha 26] er, erkek [lower-alpha 27] erkaker [lower-alpha 28] er [lower-alpha 29] ar/arśın [lower-alpha 30]
girl*kï̄ŕqïzkızqızqɨzqïz/qezgyzqız [lower-alpha 31] qɨzqıð [lower-alpha 32] qyz [lower-alpha 33] qızqizqiz [lower-alpha 34] kııs [lower-alpha 35] hĕr [lower-alpha 36]
person*kiĺi, *yạlaŋukkiši, yalaŋuqkişikişikišikişikeşe [lower-alpha 37] kišikeşekisi [lower-alpha 38] kişi [lower-alpha 39] kishikishi [lower-alpha 40] kihi [lower-alpha 41] śın [lower-alpha 42]
bride*gélinkelingelingəlinqalɨŋgälingelinkilen [lower-alpha 43] kelinkilenkelin [lower-alpha 44] kelin [lower-alpha 45] kelinkelin [lower-alpha 46] kiyiit [lower-alpha 47] kin [lower-alpha 48]
mother-in-lawkaynanaqaynanaqäynänägaýyn eneqayın ana [lower-alpha 49] qäynä [lower-alpha 50] qaıyn ene [lower-alpha 51] qaynene [lower-alpha 52] qaynonaqeyinana [lower-alpha 53] huńama [lower-alpha 54]
Body parts
heart*yürekyürekyürekürəkjürekiräg/ürägýürekyöräk [lower-alpha 55] üriak, jürekyöräkjürek [lower-alpha 56] cürök [lower-alpha 57] yurakyüreksürex [lower-alpha 58] çĕre [lower-alpha 59]
blood*kiānqankanqanqanqanganqan [lower-alpha 60] qanqan [lower-alpha 61] qan [lower-alpha 62] qanqonqanxaan [lower-alpha 63] yun
head*baĺčbašbaşbaşbašbašbaşbaşbašbaşbasbaşboshbashbaspuś/poś
hair*s(i)ač, *kïlsač, qïlsaç, kılsaç, qılsač, qɨltik/qelsaç, gylçäç, qılčač, sač, qɨlsäs, qılshash, qylçaç, qılsoch, qilsach, qilbattax, kılśüś, hul
eye*göŕközgözgözközgez/gözgözküzkioź, gozküðközközkoʻzközxarax, köskuś/koś
eyelash*kirpikkirpikkirpikkirpikkirpikkirpigkirpikkerfekkirpikkerpekkirpikkirpikkiprikkirpikkılaman, kirbiihărpăk
ear*kulkakqulqaqkulakqulaqqulaq, qulqaq, qulxaq, qulɣaqqulaqgulakqolaqqulaxqolaqqulaqqulaqquloqqulaqkulgaaxhălha
nose*burunburunburunburunburunburnburunborınburunmoronmurynmurunburunburunmurun, munnumurun
arm*kolqolkolqolqolqolgolqulkolqulqolqolqoʻlqolхolhul
hand*el-igeligeləleligälelalaqanalaqanilikilikiliială
finger*erŋek, *biarŋakerŋekparmakbarmaqbarmaqburmaqbarmaqbarmaqbarmaxbarmaqbarmaqbarmaqbarmoqbarmaqtarbaqpürne/porńa
fingernail*dïrŋaktïrŋaqtırnakdırnaqtɨrŋaqdïrnaqdyrnaktırnaqtɨrnaxtırnaqtyrnaqtırmaqtirnoqtirnaqtıngıraqçĕrne
knee*dīŕ, *dǖŕtizdizdiztizle-

(to press with one's knees)

dizdyzteztɨzteðtizetizetizzatiztobukçĕrśi, çerkuśśi
calf*baltïrbaltïrbaldırbaldırbaldɨrballïrbaldyrbaltırbaldɨrbaltırbaltyrbaltırboldirbaldirballırpıl
foot*(h)adakadaqayakayaqaδaqayaqaýakayaqajaxayaqaıaqbut, ayaqoyoq, adoqayaqataqura
belly*kạrïnqarïnkarınqarınqarɨnqarngarynqarınqarɨnqarınqarynqarınqorinqerinxarınhırăm
Animals
horse*(h)atatatatatatatatatatatatotatatut/ot
cattle*dabaringek, tabarinek, davar, sığırinək, sığıringek, ingen; tavarseğersygyrsıyırsɨjɨrhıyırsiyruy, sıyır, ineksigir, inaksiyirınaxĕne
dog*ït, *köpekïtit, köpekitɨtkepägitetit´etıtit, köbökititıtyıtă
fish*bālïkbalïqbalıkbalıqbalɨqbalïqbalykbalıqbalɨxbalıqbalyqbalıqbaliqbeliqbalıkpulă
louse*bïtbitbitbitbitbitbitbetbitbetbıtbitbitbitbıtpıytă/puťă
Other nouns
house*eb, *barkeb, barqev, barkevevävöýöyüy, üvöyüıüyuyöyśurt
tent*otag, *gereküotaɣ, kereküçadır, otağçadır; otaqotaɣ, kereküčadorçadyr; otagçatırodasatırshatyr; otauçatır, otoo, otoqchodir; oʻtoqchadir; otaqotuuçatăr
way*yōlyolyolyoljolyolýolyuljolyuljolcolyoʻlyolsuolśul
bridge*köprügköprügköprükörpüköprügköpriküperkiopriuküperköpirköpürökoʻprikkövrükkürpekĕper
arrow*okoqokoxoqox/tirokuqoquqoqoqoʻqoqoxuhă
fire*ōtōtod, ateş (Pers.)odotototutotutototoʻtotuotvut/vot
ash*külkülkülkülkülkil/külkülkölkulkölkülkülkulkülkülkĕl
water*sub, *sïbsubsususuvsusuwsusuhıwsusuusuvsuuuşıv/şu
ship, boat*gḗmikemigemigəmikemigämiköymägemikämäkemekemekemakemekimĕ
lake*kȫlkölgölgölkölgöl/gelkölkülgiol´külkölkölkoʻlkölküölkülĕ
sun/day*güneĺ, *günküngüneş, güngünəş, günkün, qujašgin/güngünqoyaş, könkujašqoyaş, könkünkünquyosh, kunquyash, künkünhĕvel, kun
cloud*bulïtbulutbulutbuludbulutbulutbulutbolıtbulutbolotbultbulutbulutbulutbılıtpĕlĕt
star*yultuŕyultuzyıldızulduzjulduzulluzýyldyzyoldızjulduzyondoðjuldyzcıldızyulduzyultuzsulusśăltăr
ground, earth*topraktopraqtopraktorpaqtopraqtorpaqtopraktufraqtopraq, topraxtupraqtopyraqtopuraqtuproqtupraqtoburaxtăpra
hilltop*tepö, *töpötöpütepetəpətepedepetübätebetübätöbedöbö, töbötepatöpetöbötüpĕ
tree/wood*ïgačïɣačağaçağacjɨɣačağaĵagaçağaçahačağasağashbaq, daraq, cığaçyogʻochyahachmasyıvăś
god (Tengri)*teŋri, *taŋrïteŋri, burqantanrıtanrıteŋritarï/Allah/XodataňrytäñreTieńritäñretäŋiriteñirtangritengritangaratură/toră
sky*teŋri, *kȫkkök, teŋrigökgöykökgey/göygökkükkökkükkökkökkoʻkkökküöxkăvak/koak
Adjectives
long*uŕïnuzunuzunuzunuzunuzunuzynozınuzunoðonuzynuzunuzunuzunuhunvărăm
new*yaŋï, *yeŋiyaŋïyeniyenijaŋɨyeŋiýaňyyañajɨŋgɨyañıjañacañıyangiyengisañaśĕnĕ
fat*semiŕsemizsemiz, şişmansəmizsemizsemizsimezsemizhimeðsemizsemizsemizsemizemissamăr
full*dōlïtoludoludolutoludoludolytulıtolɨtulıtolytoluq, tolu, toluu, tolotoʻlatoluqtolorutulli
white*āk, *ürüŋāq, ürüŋak, beyaz (Ar.)aqaqakaqaqaqaqaqoqaqürüñ (үрүҥ)şură
black*karaqarakara, siyah (Pers.)qaraqaraqärägaraqaraqaraqaraqaraqaraqoraqaraxarahura, hora
red*kïŕïlqïzïlkızıl, kırmızı (Ar.)qızılqɨzɨlqïzïlgyzylqızılqɨzɨlqıðılqyzylqızılqizilqizilkıhılhĕrlĕ
Numbers
1*bīrbirbirbirbirbirbirberbir, bɨrberbirbirbirbirbiirpĕrre
2*ékiekiikiikiẹkiikkiikiikeekyikeekiekiikkiikkiikkiikkĕ
3*üčüčüçüçüčuǰ, u̇čüçöčüćösüşüčuch/u̇čüch/üçüsviśśĕ, viśĕ, viś
4*dȫrttörtdörtdördtörtderd/dörddörtdürtdörtdürttörttörttoʻrttörttüörttăvattă
5*bēĺ(k)béšbeşbeşbéšbäşbeşbešbišbesbeşbesh/beşbesh/beşbiespillĕk
6*altïaltïaltıaltıaltïaltïalty (altï)altïaltïaltïaltyaltıolti (ålti)altäaltault, ultă, ulttă
7*yétiyetiyediyeddijetiyeddiýedicidejediyetejeticetiyettiyettisetteśiççe
8*sekiŕsäkizsekizsəkkizsek(k)iz, sik(k)izsӓkkizsekizsigezsekizhigeðsegizsegizsäkkizsäkkizaɣïssakkăr, sakăr
9*tokuŕtoquzdokuzdoqquztoquzdoġġuzdokuztugïztoɣuztuɣïðtoğyztoğuzto’qqiztoqquztoɣustăxxăr, tăxăr
10*ōnononononononunonunononoʻnonuonvunnă, vună, vun
20*yẹgirmiyigirmi/yégirmiyirmiiyirmiyigirmi, yigirmeigirmi, iyirmiyigrimiyegermeyigirmiyegermejiyirmacıyırmayigirmäyigirmäsüürbeśirĕm
30*otuŕotuzotuzotuzotuzottizotuz (otuð)otuzotuzutïðotyzotuzo’ttizottuzotutvătăr
40*kïrkqïrqkırkqırxqïrqġèrḫ (ɢərx)kyrk (kïrk)qırq (qïrq)kïrxqïrqqyryqqırqqirqqirqtüört uonxĕrĕx
50*elligäligelliǝlli (älli)el(l)igälli, ẹllielliilleeluelüü
60*altmïĺaltmïšaltmışaltmış (altmïš)altmïšaltmïšaltmyş (altmïš)altmïšaltïmïšaltïmïšalpysaltımışoltmish (åltmiš)altmišalta uonultmăl
70*yẹtmiĺyētmiš/syetmişyetmişyetmišyetmišýetmiş (yetmiš)ǰitmešyetmiš/syetmešjetpiscetimişyetmišyätmišsette uonśitmĕl
80*sekiŕ ōnsäkiz onseksensǝksǝn (säksän)seksünsӓɣsensegsenseksenseksen, seksanhikhenseksenseksensakson (säksån)säksänaɣïs uonsakăr vun(ă)
90*dokuŕ ōntoquz ondoksandoxsantoqsantogsantuksantoksan, toxsantukhantoqsantoqsonto'qson (tȯksån)toqsantoɣus uontăxăr vun(ă), tăxăr vunnă
100*yǖŕyüzyüzyüzjüziz/yüzýüzyözjiz, juz, jüzyöðjüzcüzyuzyüzsüüsśĕr
1000*bïŋbïŋbinminmiŋ, menminmüň (müŋ)meŋmin, binmeŋmyñmiñming (miŋ)miŋtïhïïnčapin
Common meaning Proto-Turkic Old Turkic Turkish Azerbaijani Karakhanid Qashqai Turkmen Tatar Karaim Bashkir Kazakh Kyrgyz Uzbek Uyghur Sakha/Yakut Chuvash

Azerbaijani "ǝ" and "ä": IPA /æ/

Azerbaijani "q": IPA /g/, word-final "q": IPA /x/

Turkish and Azerbaijani "ı", Karakhanid "ɨ", Turkmen "y", and Sakha "ï": IPA /ɯ/

Turkmen "ň", Karakhanid "ŋ": IPA /ŋ/

Turkish and Azerbaijani "y",Turkmen "ý" and "j" in other languages: IPA /j/

All "ş" and "š" letters: IPA /ʃ/

All "ç" and "č" letters: IPA /t͡ʃ/

Kyrgyz "c": IPA /d͡ʒ/

Kazakh "j": IPA /ʒ/

Other possible relations

The Turkic language family is currently regarded as one of the world's primary language families. [10] Turkic is one of the main members of the controversial Altaic language family, but Altaic currently lacks support from a majority of linguists. None of the theories linking Turkic languages to other families have a wide degree of acceptance at present. Shared features with languages grouped together as Altaic have been interpreted by most mainstream linguists to be the result of a sprachbund. [52]

Rejected or controversial theories

Korean

The possibility of a genetic relation between Turkic and Korean, independently from Altaic, is suggested by some linguists. [53] [54] [55] The linguist Kabak (2004) of the University of Würzburg states that Turkic and Korean share similar phonology as well as morphology. Li Yong-Sŏng (2014) [54] suggest that there are several cognates between Turkic and Old Korean. He states that these supposed cognates can be useful to reconstruct the early Turkic language. According to him, words related to nature, earth and ruling but especially to the sky and stars seem to be cognates.

The linguist Choi [55] suggested already in 1996 a close relationship between Turkic and Korean regardless of any Altaic connections:

In addition, the fact that the morphological elements are not easily borrowed between languages, added to the fact that the common morphological elements between Korean and Turkic are not less numerous than between Turkic and other Altaic languages, strengthens the possibility that there is a close genetic affinity between Korean and Turkic.

Choi Han-Woo, A Comparative Study of Korean and Turkic (Hoseo University)

Many historians also point out a close non-linguistic relationship between Turkic peoples and Koreans. [56] Especially close were the relations between the Göktürks and Goguryeo. [57]

Uralic

Some linguists suggested a relation to Uralic languages, especially to the Ugric languages. This view is rejected and seen as obsolete by mainstream linguists. Similarities are because of language contact and borrowings mostly from Turkic into Ugric languages. Stachowski (2015) states that any relation between Turkic and Uralic must be a contact one. [58]

See also

Notes

  1. Nikolai Baskakov and some others believe that the Kyrgyz–Kipchak subgroup originally belonged to the Siberian group, but was significantly influenced by the Kipchak languages and can now be included in the Kipchak group. [38] [39] [40]
  2. Lars Johanson once considered Kyrgyz language to be a member of South Kipchak.(Johanson 1998)
  3. Äynu contains a very large Persian vocabulary component, and is spoken exclusively by adult men, almost as a cryptolect.
  4. Lars Johanson once classified South Siberian group into 4 subgroups (Sayan Turkic, Yenisei Turkic, Chulym Turkic and Altai Turkic). Sayan Turkic consisted of Tuvan (Soyot, Uriankhai) and Tofa (Karagas). Yenisei Turkic consisted of Khakas, Shor and related dialects (Saghay, Qaca, Qizil). Chulym Turkic consisted of dialects such as Küerik. Altai Turkic consisted of Altay (Oirot) and dialects such as Tuba, Qumanda, Qu, Teleut, Telengit. (Johanson 1998)
  5. According to Lars Johanson, Fuyu Kyrgyz is considered to be closely related to Khakas.
  6. Nikolai Baskakov and some others considered Southern Altai language to be a member of Kyrgyz-Kipchak subgroup. [38] [39] [40]
  7. Cyrillic: ата, атай
  8. Cyrillic: ата, атай
  9. UEY: ئاتا
  10. Cyrillic: аҕа
  11. Cyrillic: атте, аҫу, ашшӗ
  12. Cyrillic: ана, әни
  13. Cyrillic: ана, инә(й)/асай
  14. Cyrillic: эне, ана
  15. UEY: ئانا
  16. IPA /ij̃e/. Cyrillic: ийэ. The nasal glide /j̃/ is not distinguished from oral glide /j/ in orthography.
  17. Cyrillic: анне, аннӳ, амӑшӗ
  18. Cyrillic: ул
  19. Cyrillic: ұл
  20. Cyrillic: уул
  21. UEY: ئوغۇل
  22. Cyrillic: уол
  23. Cyrillic: ывӑл, ул
  24. Cyrillic: ир
  25. Cyrillic: ир, иркәк
  26. Cyrillic: ер, еркек
  27. Cyrillic: эр, эркек
  28. UEY: ئەر
  29. Cyrillic: эр
  30. Cyrillic: ар/арҫын
  31. Cyrillic: кыз
  32. Cyrillic: ҡыҙ
  33. Cyrillic: қыз
  34. UEY: قىز
  35. Cyrillic: кыыс
  36. Cyrillic: хӗр
  37. Cyrillic: кеше
  38. Cyrillic: кісі
  39. Cyrillic: киши
  40. UEY: كىشى
  41. Cyrillic: киһи
  42. Cyrillic: ҫын
  43. Cyrillic: килен
  44. Cyrillic: келін
  45. Cyrillic: келин
  46. UEY: كەلىن
  47. Cyrillic: кийиит
  48. Cyrillic: кин
  49. Cyrillic: кайын ана
  50. Cyrillic: ҡәйнә
  51. Cyrillic: қайын ене
  52. Cyrillic: кайнене
  53. UEY: قەيىنانا
  54. Cyrillic: хунама
  55. Cyrillic: йөрәк
  56. Cyrillic: жүрек
  57. Cyrillic: жүрөк
  58. Cyrillic: сүрэх
  59. Cyrillic: чӗре
  60. Cyrillic: кан
  61. Cyrillic: ҡан
  62. Cyrillic: қан
  63. Cyrillic: хаан

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Altaic languages</span> Hypothetical language family of Eurasia

Altaic is a controversial proposed language family that would include the Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic language families and possibly also the Japonic and Koreanic languages. The hypothetical language family has long been rejected by most comparative linguists, although it continues to be supported by a small but stable scholarly minority. Speakers of the constituent languages are currently scattered over most of Asia north of 35° N and in some eastern parts of Europe, extending in longitude from the Balkan Peninsula to Japan. The group is named after the Altai mountain range in the center of Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ural-Altaic languages</span> Abandoned language family proposal

Ural-Altaic, Uralo-Altaic, Uraltaic, or Turanic is a linguistic convergence zone and abandoned language-family proposal uniting the Uralic and the Altaic languages. It is generally now agreed that even the Altaic languages do not share a common descent: the similarities among Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic are better explained by diffusion and borrowing. Just as Altaic, internal structure of the Uralic family also has been debated since the family was first proposed. Doubts about the validity of most or all of the proposed higher-order Uralic branchings are becoming more common. The term continues to be used for the central Eurasian typological, grammatical and lexical convergence zone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mongolic languages</span> Language family of Eurasia

The Mongolic languages are a language family spoken by the Mongolic peoples in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, North Asia and East Asia, mostly in Mongolia and surrounding areas and in Kalmykia and Buryatia. The best-known member of this language family, Mongolian, is the primary language of most of the residents of Mongolia and the Mongol residents of Inner Mongolia, with an estimated 5.7+ million speakers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tatar language</span> Turkic language spoken by Tatars

Tatar is a Turkic language spoken by the Volga Tatars mainly located in modern Tatarstan, as well as Siberia. It should not be confused with Crimean Tatar or Siberian Tatar, which are closely related but belong to different subgroups of the Kipchak languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tungusic languages</span> Language family of eastern Siberia and Manchuria

The Tungusic languages form a language family spoken in Eastern Siberia and Manchuria by Tungusic peoples. Many Tungusic languages are endangered. There are approximately 75,000 native speakers of the dozen living languages of the Tungusic language family. The term "Tungusic" is from an exonym for the Evenk people (Ewenki) used by the Yakuts ("tongus").

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bashkir language</span> Turkic language of the Kipchak sub-branch

Bashkir or Bashkort is a Turkic language belonging to the Kipchak branch. It is co-official with Russian in Bashkortostan. It is spoken by 1.09 million native speakers in Russia, as well as in Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Estonia and other neighboring post-Soviet states, and among the Bashkir diaspora. It has three dialect groups: Southern, Eastern and Northwestern.

Bulgar is an extinct Oghuric Turkic language spoken by the Bulgars.

Altai is a set of Turkic languages, which are in turn hypothesized by some to be a set of Altaic languages spoken officially in the Altai Republic, Russia. The standard vocabulary is based on the Southern Altai language, though it's also taught to and used by speakers of the Northern Altai language as well. Gorno–Altai refers to a subgroup of languages in the Altai Mountains.The languages were called Oyrot (ойрот) prior to 1948.

Chuvash is a Turkic language spoken in European Russia, primarily in the Chuvash Republic and adjacent areas. It is the only surviving member of the Oghur branch of Turkic languages, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family.

The Onoghurs, Onoğurs, or Oğurs were Turkic nomadic equestrians who flourished in the Pontic–Caspian steppe and the Volga region between 5th and 7th century, and spoke the Oghuric language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karakalpak language</span> Kipchak Turkic language of Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan

Karakalpak is a Turkic language spoken by Karakalpaks in Karakalpakstan. It is divided into two dialects, Northeastern Karakalpak and Southwestern Karakalpak. It developed alongside Nogai and neighbouring Kazakh languages, being markedly influenced by both. Typologically, Karakalpak belongs to the Kipchak branch of the Turkic languages, thus being closely related to and highly mutually intelligible with Kazakh and Nogai.

Old Turkic is the earliest attested form of the Common Turkic languages, first found in Second Turkic Khaganate then in Uyghur Khaganate inscriptions. In marked contrast to Middle Turkic, the geographic extent of (East) Old Turkic is rather confined, being limited mainly to East Turkistan and Mongolia. In terms of the datability of extant written sources, the period of Old Turkic can be dated from slightly before 720 AD to the Mongol invasions of the 13th century. Orkhon Turkic and Old Uyghur are considered to be dialects of East Old Turkic, Orkhon Turkic being the earliest attested dialect of (East) Old Turkic. There is a difference of opinion among linguists with regard to Karakhanid Turkic, some classify it as another dialect of East Old Turkic, while others prefer to include Karakhanid among Middle Turkic languages; nonetheless, Karakhanid is extremely close to Old Uyghur so much so that a single grammatical description will fit both of them. East Old Turkic and West Old Turkic together comprise the Old Turkic proper. East Old Turkic is the oldest attested member of the Siberian Turkic branch of Turkic languages, and several of its now-archaic grammatical as well as lexical features are extant in the modern Yellow Uyghur, Lop Nur Uyghur and Khalaj ; Khalaj, for instance, has (surprisingly) retained a considerable number of archaic Old Turkic words despite forming a language island within Central Iran and being heavily influenced by Persian. Old Uyghur is not a direct ancestor of the Modern Standard Uyghur language ; the contemporaneous ancestor of Modern Uyghur was one of the Middle Turkic languages, later giving rise to Chagatai literary language.

Fuyu Kyrgyz, also known as Manchurian Kirghiz, is a critically endangered Turkic language, and as, Gïrgïs, Kyrgysdar is an ethnonym of the Turkic unrecognized ethnic group in China. Despite the name, the Fuyu Kyrgyz language is not closely related to the Kyrgyz language, which is of Kipchak origin. The Fuyu Kyrgyz language is more similar to the Western Yugur language and the Abakan Turkic languages. The people originated in the Yenisei region of Siberia but were relocated into Dzungaria by the Dzungars.

The Kipchak languages are a sub-branch of the Turkic language family spoken by approximately 28 million people in much of Central Asia and Eastern Europe, spanning from Ukraine to China. Some of the most widely spoken languages in this group are Kazakh, Kyrgyz and Tatar.

Proto-Turkic is the linguistic reconstruction of the common ancestor of the Turkic languages that was spoken by the Proto-Turks before their divergence into the various Turkic peoples. Proto-Turkic separated into Oghur (western) and Common Turkic (eastern) branches. Candidates for the proto-Turkic homeland range from western Central Asia to Manchuria, with most scholars agreeing that it lay in the eastern part of the Central Asian steppe, while one author has postulated that Proto-Turkic originated 2,500 years ago in East Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siberian Turkic languages</span> Sub-branch of the Turkic language family

The Siberian Turkic or Northeastern Common Turkic languages, are a sub-branch of the Turkic language family. The following table is based upon the classification scheme presented by Lars Johanson (1998). All languages of the branch combined have approximately 750,000–1 million native and second language speakers, with most widely spoken members being Yakut, Tuvan and Northern Altai. Despite their usual English name, two major Turkic languages spoken in Siberia, Siberian Tatar and Southern Altai, are not classified as Siberian Turkic, but are rather part of the Kipchak subgroup.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common Turkic languages</span> Classification of the Turkic language family

Common Turkic, or Shaz Turkic, is a taxon in some classifications of the Turkic languages that includes all of them except the Oghuric languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yakut language</span> Siberian Turkic language

Yakutyə-KOOT, also known as Yakutian, Sakha, Saqa or Saxa, is a Turkic language belonging to Siberian Turkic branch and spoken by around 450,000 native speakers, primarily the ethnic Yakuts and one of the official languages of Sakha (Yakutia), a federal republic in the Russian Federation.

<i>Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages</i> Dictionary of the hypothetical Altaic language family

The Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages is a comparative and etymological dictionary of the hypothetical Altaic language family. It was written by linguists Sergei Starostin, Anna Dybo, and Oleg Mudrak, and was published in Leiden in 2003 by Brill Publishers. It contains 3 volumes, and is a part of the Handbook of Oriental Studies: Section 8, Uralic and Central Asian Studies; no. 8.

References

  1. 1 2 Rybatzki, Volker (2020). "Altaic Languages: Tungusic, Mongolic, Turkic". In Martine Robbeets; Alexander Savelyev (eds.). The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages. Oxford University Press. pp. 22–28. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198804628.003.0003.
  2. Dybo A.V. (2007). "ХРОНОЛОГИЯ ТЮРКСКИХ ЯЗЫКОВ И ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИЕ КОНТАКТЫ РАННИХ ТЮРКОВ" [Chronology of Turkish Languages and Linguistic Contacts of Early Turks](PDF) (in Russian). p. 766. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 March 2005. Retrieved 1 April 2020.
  3. Janhunen, Juha (2013). "Personal pronouns in Core Altaic". In Martine Irma Robbeets; Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages. John Benjamins. p. 223. ISBN   9789027205995. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  4. 1 2 3 Katzner, Kenneth (March 2002). Languages of the World, Third Edition. Routledge, an imprint of Taylor & Francis Books Ltd. ISBN   978-0-415-25004-7.
  5. Grenoble, L.A. (2003). Language Policy in the Soviet Union. Springer. p. 10. ISBN   9781402012983.
  6. "Language Materials Project: Turkish". UCLA International Institute, Center for World Languages. February 2007. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 26 April 2007.
  7. Vovin, Alexander (2005). "The end of the Altaic controversy: In memory of Gerhard Doerfer". Central Asiatic Journal. 49 (1): 71–132. JSTOR   41928378.
  8. Georg, Stefan; Michalove, Peter A.; Ramer, Alexis Manaster; Sidwell, Paul J. (1999). "Telling general linguists about Altaic". Journal of Linguistics. 35 (1): 65–98. doi:10.1017/S0022226798007312. JSTOR   4176504. S2CID   144613877.
  9. Sinor, 1988, p.710
  10. 1 2 George van DRIEM: Handbuch der Orientalistik. Volume 1 Part 10. BRILL 2001. Page 336
  11. M. A. Castrén, Nordische Reisen und Forschungen. V, St.-Petersburg, 1849
  12. Standish, Russell K.; Bedau, Mark; Abbass, Hussein A. (25 August 2023). Artificial Life 8. MIT Press. p. 391. ISBN   9780262692816.
  13. Yunusbayev, Bayazit; Metspalu, Mait; Metspalu, Ene; et al. (21 April 2015). "The Genetic Legacy of the Expansion of Turkic-Speaking Nomads across Eurasia". PLOS Genetics. 11 (4): e1005068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005068 . ISSN   1553-7390. PMC   4405460 . PMID   25898006. The origin and early dispersal history of the Turkic peoples is disputed, with candidates for their ancient homeland ranging from the Transcaspian steppe to Manchuria in Northeast Asia,
  14. Yunusbayev, Bayazit; Metspalu, Mait; Metspalu, Ene; et al. (21 April 2015). "The Genetic Legacy of the Expansion of Turkic-Speaking Nomads across Eurasia". PLOS Genetics. 11 (4): e1005068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005068 . ISSN   1553-7390. PMC   4405460 . PMID   25898006. Thus, our study provides the first genetic evidence supporting one of the previously hypothesized IAHs to be near Mongolia and South Siberia.
  15. Blench, Roger; Spriggs, Matthew (2003). Archaeology and Language II: Archaeological Data and Linguistic Hypotheses. Routledge. p. 203. ISBN   9781134828692. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  16. Golden, Peter Benjamin (2011). "Ethnogenesis in the tribal zone: The Shaping of the Turks". Studies on the peoples and cultures of the Eurasian steppes Archived 26 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine . Bucureşti: Ed. Acad. Române. p. 35-37
  17. Clark, Larry V. (1980). "Turkic Loanwords in Mongol, I: The Treatment of Non-initial S, Z, Š, Č". Central Asiatic Journal . 24 (1/2): 36–59. JSTOR   41927278.
  18. Rachewiltz, Igor de. Introduction to Altaic philology: Turkic, Mongolian, Manchu / by Igor de Rachewiltz and Volker Rybatzki; with the collaboration of Hung Chin-fu. p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental Studies = Handbuch der Orientalistik. Section 8, Central Asia; 20). — Leiden; Boston, 2010. — P. 7.
  19. Johanson, Lars; Johanson, Éva Ágnes Csató (29 April 2015). The Turkic Languages. Routledge. ISBN   9781136825279. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 22 November 2020.
  20. Soucek, Svat (March 2000). A History of Inner Asia . Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-65169-1.
  21. Poppe, Nicolas J. (1966). "A Survey of Studies of Turkic Loan-Words in the Russian Language". Central Asiatic Journal. 11 (4): 287–310. ISSN   0008-9192. JSTOR   41926932. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
  22. Findley, Carter V. (October 2004). The Turks in World History. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-517726-8.
  23. Turkic Language tree Archived 14 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine entries provide the information on the Turkic-speaking regions.
  24. Johanson, Lars (2001). "Discoveries on the Turkic linguistic map" (PDF). Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul. Retrieved 18 March 2007.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)[ permanent dead link ]
  25. 1 2 Lars Johanson, The History of Turkic. In Lars Johanson & Éva Ágnes Csató (eds), The Turkic Languages, London, New York: Routledge, 81–125, 1998.Classification of Turkic languages Archived 8 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  26. See the main article on Lir-Turkic.
  27. Gordon, Raymond G. Jr., ed. (2005). "Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Fifteenth edition. Language Family Trees – Turkic". Archived from the original on 14 September 2012. Retrieved 18 March 2007. The reliability of Ethnologue lies mainly in its statistics whereas its framework for the internal classification of Turkic is still based largely on Baskakov (1962) and the collective work in Deny et al. (1959–1964). A more up-to-date alternative to classifying these languages on internal comparative grounds is to be found in the work of Johanson and his co-workers.
  28. Hruschka, Daniel J.; Branford, Simon; Smith, Eric D.; Wilkins, Jon; Meade, Andrew; Pagel, Mark; Bhattacharya, Tanmoy (2015). "Detecting Regular Sound Changes in Linguistics as Events of Concerted Evolution 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.064". Current Biology. 25 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.064. PMC   4291143 . PMID   25532895.
  29. Самойлович, А. Н. (1922). Некоторые дополнения к классификации турецких языков (in Russian). Archived from the original on 19 July 2018. Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  30. Larry Clark, "Chuvash", in The Turkic Languages, eds. Lars Johanson & Éva Ágnes Csató (London–NY: Routledge, 2006), 434–452.
  31. Anton Antonov & Guillaume Jacques, "Turkic kümüš 'silver' and the lambdaism vs sigmatism debate" Archived 15 January 2023 at the Wayback Machine , Turkic Languages 15, no. 2 (2012): 151–70.
  32. Lars Johanson, "The classification of the Turkic languages" Archived 15 January 2023 at the Wayback Machine , in Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages, 2020, Oxford University Press, pp. 105–114
  33. 1 2 3 4 "turcologica". Archived from the original on 8 April 2011. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
  34. Deviating. Historically developed from Southwestern (Oghuz) (Johanson 1998) Archived 8 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  35. 1 2 3 Johanson, Lars & Éva Agnes Csató (ed.). 1998. The Turkic languages. London: Routledge. 82-83p.
  36. Urum Archived 4 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine – Glottolog
  37. Krymchak Archived 7 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine – Glottolog
  38. 1 2 3 Baskakov, N. A. (1958). "La Classification des Dialectes de la Langue Turque d'Altaï". Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (in French). 8: 9–15. ISSN   0001-6446.
  39. 1 2 3 Baskakov, N. A. (1969). Введение в изучение тюркских языков[Introduction to the study of the Turkic languages] (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.
  40. 1 2 3 Kormushin, I. V. (2018). "Алтайский язык" [Altai language]. Большая российская энциклопедия/Great Russian Encyclopedia Online (in Russian). Archived from the original on 27 July 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
  41. Ili Turki Archived 20 June 2021 at the Wayback Machine – Glottolog
  42. Rassadin, V.I. "The Soyot Language". Endangered Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 3 May 2006. Retrieved 18 July 2021.
  43. "Northern Altai". ELP Endangered Languages Project. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
  44. "Kumandin". ELP Endangered Languages Project. Archived from the original on 27 November 2021. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
  45. Bitkeeva, A.N. "The Kumandin Language". Endangered Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
  46. Tazranova, A.R. "The Chelkan Language". Endangered Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
  47. Nevskaya, I.A. "The Teleut Language". Endangered Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
  48. Coene 2009 Archived 15 January 2023 at the Wayback Machine , p. 75
  49. Brown, Keith; Ogilvie, Sarah, eds. (2010). Concise Encyclopedia of Languages of the World (revised ed.). Elsevier. p. 1109. ISBN   978-0080877754. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  50. Johanson, Lars, ed. (1998). The Mainz Meeting: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, August 3–6, 1994. Turcologica Series. Contributor Éva Ágnes Csató. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 28. ISBN   978-3447038645. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  51. In Glottolog, Western Yugur is classified as Enisei-East Siberian Turkic.
  52. Janhunen, Juha A. (17 January 2023). "The Unity and Diversity of Altaic". Annual Review of Linguistics. 9 (1): 135–154. doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-042356. hdl: 10138/355895 . ISSN   2333-9683. S2CID   256126714.
  53. Sibata, Takesi (1979). "Some syntactic similarities between Turkish, Korean, and Japanese". Central Asiatic Journal. 23 (3/4): 293–296. ISSN   0008-9192. JSTOR   41927271.
  54. 1 2 SOME STAR NAMES IN MODERN TURKIC LANGUAGES-I – Yong-Sŏng LI – Academy of Korean Studies Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (AKS-2010-AGC-2101) – Seoul National University 2014
  55. 1 2 Choi, Han-Woo (1996). "A comparative study of Korean and Turkic: Is Korean Altaic?" (PDF). International Journal of Central Asian Studies. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 December 2019. Retrieved 24 April 2019.
  56. Babayar, Gaybullah (2004). "On the ancient relations between the Turkic and Korean peoples" (PDF). Journal of Turkic Civilization Studies (1): 151–155. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2019. Retrieved 24 April 2019.
  57. Tae-Don, Noh (2016). "Relations between ancient Korea and Turkey: An examination of contacts between Koguryŏ and the Turkic Khaganate". Seoul Journal of Korean Studies. 29 (2): 361–369. doi:10.1353/seo.2016.0017. hdl:10371/164838. ISSN   2331-4826. S2CID   151445857. Archived from the original on 24 April 2019. Retrieved 24 April 2019.
  58. Stachowski, Marek (2015). "Turkic pronouns against a Uralic background". Iran and the Caucasus. 19 (1): 79–86. doi:10.1163/1573384X-20150106. ISSN   1609-8498. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 24 April 2019.

Further reading