Siangic languages

Last updated

Siangic
Koro-Holon
Geographic
distribution
Arunachal Pradesh
Linguistic classification Sino-Tibetan?
Subdivisions
Glottolog koro1317

The Siangic languages (or Koro-Holon languages [1] ) are a small family of possibly Sino-Tibetan languages spoken in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. The Siangic languages consist of Koro and Milang.

Contents

Classification

Milang, which has been extensively influenced by Padam (a Tani language), is alternatively classified as a divergent Tani language (Post & Blench 2011). Koro has undergone influence from Hruso (Post & Blench 2011). However, Milang and Koro do not belong to either the Tani or Hrusish groups of languages.

It is unclear whether the Siangic is a branch of Sino-Tibetan or an independent language family that has undergone extensive Sino-Tibetan influence. Post & Blench (2011) note that Siangic has a substratum of unknown origin, and consider Siangic to be an independent language family. Anderson (2014), [1] who refers to Siangic as Koro-Holon instead, considers Siangic (Koro-Holon) to be a branch of Sino-Tibetan rather than an independent language family.

Reconstruction

Post & Blench (2011)

The following Proto-Siangic forms reconstructed by Mark Post & Roger Blench (2011:8-9) do not have lexical parallels with Proto-Tani, and are unique to the Siangic branch.

GlossProto-Siangic Koro Milang
(negator suffix)*-ŋa-ŋa-ŋə
(desiderative suffix)*-mi-mi-mi
give*ramram
know*fufuhu
ant*paŋpa-supaŋ-kər
chicken*coco-lea-cu
stone*buu-buda-bu
ear*raɲ(u?)ra-ɲu
mouth*caŋsa-pucaŋ-ci
buttocks*kɨ-ruŋkɨɻki-ruŋ
pus*a-nɨi-nia-nɨ
day*nəme-nea-nə
sun*məme-nemə-ruŋ [2]
seven*roŋ(al)raŋal
eight*ra-ljaŋrã-larajəŋ
ten*faŋfã-lãhaŋ-tak
axe*rak-purak-para-pu
grandfather*abo- + 'old man'abo-murzia-bə (bu-ku ~ ma-zaŋ)
grandmother*adze- + 'old woman'aje-mɨsiŋa-dzi (dzi-ku)
sand*bu-pibu-pibu-pi
yesterday*ba-nəba-n(e)ba-nə
have (be there)*kjokocu
bamboo*fufua-hu
egg*cu-cicu-cici-ci
what*hVgV-nV(h)igi-naha-ga-nu
cultivated field*p(j?)upua-pu
rice paddy*kɨki-rakadu-kɨ
green*ja-caŋjã-cajə-caŋ
small*u(-ŋa?)u-ŋau-lee
sister, older*a-Coo-foa-u
root*raŋne-raŋta-pɨr [3]
ripe*ŋini-ŋiman [4]
tell*pupu-s(u)po-lu

Modi (2013)

Modi (2013) [5] lists the following Proto-Siangic forms, along with forms for Milang, Koro, Idu, Taraon, and Proto-Tani. Additional cognate sets that were not included in Post & Blench (2011) include black, house, salt, fat, and today.

GlossProto-Siangic Koro Milang Taraon Idu Proto-Tani
today*V-nese-neɨ-nəa tia-n̥ne tia-ɲi*si-lo
seven*roŋ(al)ra-ŋalweŋ, ɨ-eŋi-ɦoŋ*kV-nV(t), *kV-nɨt
ear*raɲ(u?)ra-ɲukru-naŋakru-na, ako-na*ɲa(-ruŋ), *ɲo
give*ramramhaŋhaŋ*bi
axe*rak-purak-para-pupae-pa*əgɨŋ
eight*ra-ljaŋrãlara-jɛŋliɨmi-lioŋ*pri-ɲi
salt*puplota-puplapra*lo
ant*paŋpa-supaŋ-kərpaː-chaipa-si*ruk
day*nəme-nea-nəkɨ-ni-ni*lo
house*Noŋŋɨna-ɲuk*kum
sun*məme-nemə-ruŋrɨnrɨŋ, rɨn*doŋ-ɲi
black*mamaje-gjaŋmama
white*ljolap(l)õje-cciliolio*pun, *puŋ
rice*kjeki-rakadu-kɨkieke*am-bwn
bamboo*fufuahuhuia bra li*ɦə(ŋ)
know*fufuhuka-saka-sa*ken
fat*fofõ, u-fua-huta-soso*fu
ten*faŋfã-lãhaŋ-takxa-lɨŋhoŋ-ɦoŋ*cam, *(r)jiŋ
egg*cu-cicucicicia(ː)-teimeto cu*pɨ
fowl/chicken*coco-lea-cutiume-to*rok
mouth*caŋsa-pucaŋ-citʰɨ-rɨm-bram, thɨ-rɨntʰɨ-ram-bram, eko-be*gam (*nap)
sand*bu-pibu-pisa-pita-pia-pisulli ( Padam )
yesterday*ba-nəba-neba-nəbɨ-liɨŋbɨ-ɲi*mə-lo

See also

References and notes

  1. 1 2 Anderson, Gregory D.S. 2014. On the classification of the Hruso (Aka) language. Paper presented at the 20th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  2. Means 'sun'; also, Milang has a-mə 'sunlight'.
  3. From Proto-Tani *pɨr
  4. From Proto-Tani *min
  5. Modi, Yankee. 2013. The nearest relatives of the Tani group. Paper presented at the 19th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Canberra, Australia.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Tibetan languages</span> Language family native to Asia

Sino-Tibetan, also cited as Trans-Himalayan in a few sources, is a family of more than 400 languages, second only to Indo-European in number of native speakers. The vast majority of these are the 1.3 billion native speakers of Sinitic languages. Other Sino-Tibetan languages with large numbers of speakers include Burmese and the Tibetic languages. Other languages of the family are spoken in the Himalayas, the Southeast Asian Massif, and the eastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. Most of these have small speech communities in remote mountain areas, and as such are poorly documented.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Languages of Asia</span>

Asia, comprising different language families and some unrelated isolates. The major language families include Austroasiatic, Austronesian, Caucasian, Dravidian, Indo-European, Afroasiatic, Turkic, Sino-Tibetan and Kra–Dai. Most, but not all, have a long history as a written language.

East Kameng district is one of districts of Arunachal Pradesh state in northeastern, India. It shares an international border with China in the north and district borders with West Kameng district to the west, Pakke-Kessang district to the south, Kurung Kumey district to the east, Papum Pare district to the southeast. Pakke-Kessang district was bifurcated from East Kameng district on 1 December 2018.

Tani, is a branch of Sino-Tibetan languages spoken mostly in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, and neighboring regions.

The Digaro (Digarish), Northern Mishmi (Mishmic), or Kera'a–Tawrã languages are a small family of possibly Sino-Tibetan languages spoken by the Mishmi people of southeastern Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh.

Miju, Kaman–Meyor, Midžuish, Southern Mishmi, or Geman languages are a small proposed family of Sino-Tibetan languages spoken by the Kaman people of southeastern Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh. The languages are Kaman (Midzu/Miju) and Zakhring (Meyor). Although Zakhring appears to be Sino-Tibetan, Kaman may be more divergent. Blench and Post (2011) believe that Zakhring is an East Bodish language that has been influenced by Midzu or other divergent languages of the region, whereas Kaman may be a language isolate.

The Hrusish or Southeast Kamengic languages possibly constitute a Sino-Tibetan branch in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. They are Hruso (Aka) and Mijiic. In Glottolog, Hammarström, et al. does not accept Hrusish, and considers similarities between Hruso and Miji to be due to loanwords.

The Kho-Bwa languages, also known as Kamengic, are a small family of languages spoken in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. The name Kho-Bwa was originally proposed by George van Driem (2001). It is based on the reconstructed words *kho ("water") and *bwa ("fire"). Blench (2011) suggests the name Kamengic, from the Kameng area of Arunachal Pradesh. Alternatively, Anderson (2014) refers to Kho-Bwa as Northeast Kamengic.

Bodish, named for the Tibetan ethnonym Bod, is a proposed grouping consisting of the Tibetic languages and associated Sino-Tibetan languages spoken in Tibet, North India, Nepal, Bhutan, and North Pakistan. It has not been demonstrated that all these languages form a clade, characterized by shared innovations, within Sino-Tibetan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibeto-Burman languages</span> Group of the Sino-Tibetan language family

The Tibeto-Burman languages are the non-Sinitic members of the Sino-Tibetan language family, over 400 of which are spoken throughout the Southeast Asian Massif ("Zomia") as well as parts of East Asia and South Asia. Around 60 million people speak Tibeto-Burman languages. The name derives from the most widely spoken of these languages, Burmese and the Tibetic languages, which also have extensive literary traditions, dating from the 12th and 7th centuries respectively. Most of the other languages are spoken by much smaller communities, and many of them have not been described in detail.

Koro is known as a Tibeto-Burman language belonging to the Sino-Tibetan language family, even though it has resemblances to Tani farther to the east. It has been argued that Koro is actually part of the Greater Siangic family, independent from but influenced by the Sino-Tibetan family. Koro is spoken by about 1,500 people in the Koro-Aka tribe who are found in the East Kameng District of Arunachal Pradesh in northeast India. Few speakers are under 20 years old. The majority of Koro speakers live in bilingual households in which one or more members speak Ako or another indigenous language rather than Koro. The Koro-Aka tribe lives among the Aka (Hruso) tribe. However, the Koro-Aka people speak a very distantly related language from the remaining Aka tribe who speak Hruso-Aka. Researchers hypothesize Koro may have originated from a group of people enslaved and brought to the area. Since there are so few people who speak Koro, it is considered an endangered language.

Sino-Austronesian or Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian is a proposed language family suggested by Laurent Sagart in 1990. Using reconstructions of Old Chinese, Sagart argued that the Austronesian languages are related to the Sinitic languages phonologically, lexically and morphologically. Sagart later accepted the Sino-Tibetan languages as a valid group and extended his proposal to include the rest of Sino-Tibetan. He also placed the Tai–Kadai languages within the Austronesian family as a sister branch of Malayo-Polynesian. The proposal has been largely rejected by other linguists who argue that the similarities between Austronesian and Sino-Tibetan more likely arose from contact rather than being genetic.

There have been various classification schemes for Southeast Asian languages.

Proto-Tibeto-Burman is the reconstructed ancestor of the Tibeto-Burman languages, that is, the Sino-Tibetan languages, except for Chinese. An initial reconstruction was produced by Paul K. Benedict and since refined by James Matisoff. Several other researchers argue that the Tibeto-Burman languages sans Chinese do not constitute a monophyletic group within Sino-Tibetan, and therefore that Proto-Tibeto-Burman was the same language as Proto-Sino-Tibetan.

Hruso, also known as Aka (Angka), is a language of Arunachal Pradesh India. Long assumed to be a Sino-Tibetan language, it may actually be a language isolate. It is spoken by 3,000 people in 21 villages in Thrizino Circle, West Kameng District. The Hruso people inhabit areas of South East Kameng and are concentrated in the Bichom River Valley, and speak English, Hindi, and Miji in addition to Hruso.

Zahkring is a language of Arunachal Pradesh and 3 villages in Tibet.

Milang is a Siangic or Tani language of Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India. It is spoken in the 3 villages of Milang, Dalbing, and Pekimodi, located in Mariyang Subdivision, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

Arunachal languages are various languages in Arunachal Pradesh, India traditionally classified as Sino-Tibetan languages, but that may be language isolates and independent language families according to some scholars. Blench (2011) proposed four language isolates and three independent families. However, this is disputed by Anderson (2014) and others, who consider them to be primary branches of Sino-Tibetan rather than as isolates or independent language phyla.

Greater Siangic is a language grouping that includes the Siangic languages, Digaro languages and Pre-Tani, the hypothetical substrate language branch of Tani before it became relexified by Sino-Tibetan. The Greater Siangic grouping was proposed by Roger Blench (2014), based on exclusively shared lexical items that had been noted by Modi (2013). Blench (2014) argues that Greater Siangic is an independent language family that has undergone areal influences from Sino-Tibetan languages, and is not a branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family itself.

The East Asian languages are a language family proposed by Stanley Starosta in 2001. The proposal has since been adopted by George van Driem and others.