Puquina languages | |
---|---|
Geographic distribution | Around Lake Titicaca |
Extinct | early 19th century L2: 10-20 (Kallawaya) |
Linguistic classification | usually unclassified Macro-Arawakan? |
Subdivisions | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | puq (Puquina proper only) |
Glottolog | puqu1242 (Puquina proper only) |
Puquina (proper) | |
---|---|
Pukina | |
Native to | Bolivia, Peru |
Region | Lake Titicaca |
Extinct | early 19th century |
Puquina
| |
Official status | |
Official language in | Bolivia |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | puq |
Glottolog | puqu1242 |
Pukina language distribution around 1600 CE, Pukina toponyms, and pre-Inca Pukina ethnicities. |
Puquina (or Pukina) is a small, putative language family, often portrayed as a language isolate, which consists of the extinct Puquina language and Kallawaya. It is assumed that the latter is just a remnant of the former mixed with Quechuan, Puquina speakers are last mentioned in the early nineteenth century. [3]
The Qhapaq simi, which was spoken by the Inca elite, in contrast to the Quechuan-speaking commoners, is thought to be related, as well as the Leco language, generally considered a language isolate. They are spoken by several native ethnic groups in the region surrounding Lake Titicaca (Peru and Bolivia) and in the north of Chile. Puquina itself is often associated with the culture that built Tiwanaku.
In spite of the fact that Puquina was originally a lingua franca of the region during colonization it rapidly declined and then went extinct. Its decline began before the Spanish conquest as Aymaran speaking peoples divided the population of Puquina into several small groups. [4]
Remnants of the single, ancestral Puquina language can be found in the Quechuan and Spanish languages spoken in the south of Peru, mainly in Arequipa, Moquegua and Tacna, as well as in Bolivia. There also seem to be remnants in the Kallawaya language, which may be a mixed language formed from Quechuan languages and Puquina. (Terrence Kaufman (1990) finds the proposal plausible. [5] )
Some theories claim that Qhapaq Simi, the cryptic language of the nobility of the Inca Empire, was closely related to Puquina, and that Runa Simi (Quechuan languages) were spoken by commoners. The Leco language might also be related. [5]
Moulian et al. (2015) argue that Puquina language influenced the Mapuche language of southern Chile long before the rise of the Inca Empire. [6] This areal linguistic influence may have started with a migratory wave arising from the collapse of the Tiwanaku Empire around 1000 CE. [6] [7]
Sometimes the term Puquina is used for the Uru language, which is distinctly different.
Puquina has been considered an unclassified language family, since it has not been proven to be firmly related to any other languages in the Andean region. A relationship with the Arawakan languages has long been suggested, based solely on the possessive paradigm (1st no-, 2nd pi-, 3rd ču-), which is similar to the Proto-Arawakan subject forms (1st *nu-, 2nd *pi-, 3rd *tʰu-). Jolkesky (2016: 310–317) has presented further possible lexical cognates between Puquina and the Arawakan languages, proposing that this language family belongs to the putative Macro-Arawakan stock along with the Candoshi and the Munichi languages. However, such a hypothesis still lacks conclusive scientific evidence.
In this regard, Adelaar and van de Kerke (2009: 126) have pointed out that if in fact the Puquina languages are, genetically, related to the Arawakan languages, its separation from this family must have occurred at a relatively early date; the authors further suggest that in such a case the location of the Puquina speakers should be taken into account in the debate over the geographic origin of the Arawakan family. Such consideration was taken up by Jolkesky (op. cit., 611–616) in his archaeo-ecolinguistic model of diversification of the Macro-Arawakan languages. According to this author, the proto-Macro-Arawakan language would have been spoken in the Middle Ucayali River Basin during the beginning of the 2nd millennium BCE and its speakers would have produced the Tutishcainyo pottery found in this region.
Jolkesky (2016) classifies Puquina as a Macro-Arawakan language. [8]
Jolkesky (2016) notes that there are lexical similarities with the Aymaran, Cahuapanan, Quechuan, Panoan, Tananan and Uru-Chipaya language families due to contact. [9] [4]
From a list of 200 basic words, 70 percent were not borrowed, 14 percent were from Aymara, 2 percent were from the Uru-Chipaya family, and the remaining 14 percent were unspecified. [4]
Numerals in Puquina and other nearby languages: [10]
Numeral | Puquina | Kallawaya | Uru | Quechua | Aymara |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | pesq | uksi | shi | huk ~ shuk | maya |
2 | so | soo | pisqe | iskay | paya |
3 | qapa | qapi | chcp | kimsa | kimsa |
4 | sper | pili | pakpik | tawa | pusi |
5 | taqpa | chisma | paanuqo | pisqa | pisqa |
6 | chichun | tajwa | pachuy | suqta | sojta (qallqo) |
7 | stu | kajsi | tohonqo | qanchis | pa qallqo |
8 | kina | wasa | qonqo | pusaq | kimsa qallqo |
9 | cheqa | nuki | sanqaw | isqun | lla-tunqa |
10 | sqara | jocha | qalo | chunka | tunqa |
Pronouns in Puquina and other nearby languages: [10]
English | Puquina | Kallawaya | Uru | Quechua | Aymara |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | ni | nisi | wiril | ñuqa | naya |
you (sg.) | pi | chuu | amp | qam | juma |
he | chu, hi | chuinin | tis, nis | pay | jupa |
we (inclusive) | nich | nisiyku | uchumi | ñuqayku | jiwasa |
we (exclusive) | señ | nisinchej | wisnaqa | ñuqanchik | nanaka |
you (pl.) | pich | chuukunas | ampchuqa | qamkuna | jumanaka |
they | chuch | chuininkuna | nisnaqa | paykuna | jupanaka |
Loukotka (1968) lists the following basic vocabulary items for Puquina and Kallawaya (which he calls Pohena). [11]
gloss | Puquina | Kallawaya |
---|---|---|
one | pesk | uxsi |
two | so | suyo |
three | kapak | kxapi |
head | kxutu | |
eye | sekbi | paxañi |
hand | kupi | sui |
woman | atago | atasi |
water | unu | mimi |
Macro-Arawakan is a proposed language family of South America and the Caribbean centered on the Arawakan languages. Sometimes, the proposal is called Arawakan, and the central family is called Maipurean.
Aymaran is one of the two dominant language families in the central Andes alongside Quechuan. The family consists of Aymara, widely spoken in Bolivia, and the endangered Jaqaru and Kawki languages of Peru.
Mochica is an extinct language formerly spoken along the northwest coast of Peru and in an inland village. First documented in 1607, the language was widely spoken in the area during the 17th century and the early 18th century. By the late 19th century, the language was dying out and spoken only by a few people in the village of Etén, in Chiclayo. It died out as a spoken language around 1920, but certain words and phrases continued to be used until the 1960s.
The Araucanian languages are a small language family of indigenous languages of the Americas spoken in central Chile and neighboring areas of Argentina. The living representatives of this family are Mapudungun and Huilliche, spoken respectively by the Mapuche and Huilliche people. These are usually considered divergent dialects of a single language isolate.
Munichi is an extinct language which was spoken in the village of Munichis, about 10 miles (16 km) west of Yurimaguas, Loreto Region, Peru. In 1988, there were two mother-tongue speakers, but they had not met since the 1970s. The last known fluent speaker, Victoria Huancho Icahuate, died in the late 1990s. As of 2009 there were several semi-speakers who retained significant lexical, and partial grammatical, knowledge of the language.
Pano-Tacanan is a proposed family of languages spoken in Peru, western Brazil, Bolivia and northern Paraguay. There are two close-knit branches, Panoan and Tacanan, with 33 languages. There are lexical and grammatical similarities between the two branches, but it has not yet been demonstrated that these are genetic.
Yuracaré is an endangered language isolate of central Bolivia in Cochabamba and Beni departments spoken by the Yuracaré people.
Mataguayo–Guaicuru, Mataco–Guaicuru or Macro-Waikurúan is a proposed language family consisting of the Mataguayan and Guaicuruan languages. Pedro Viegas Barros claims to have demonstrated it. These languages are spoken in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Bolivia.
Kunza is a mostly extinct language isolate spoken in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile and southern Peru by the Atacama people, who have since shifted to Spanish. The last speaker was documented in 1949; however, it has since been learned that the language is still spoken in the desert.
Candoshi-Shapra is an indigenous American language isolate, spoken by several thousand people in western South America along the Chapuli, Huitoyacu, Pastaza, and Morona river valleys. There are two dialects, Chapara and Kandoashi (Kandozi). It is an official language of Peru, like other native languages in the areas in which they are spoken and are the predominant language in use. Around 88.5 percent of the speakers are bilingual with Spanish. The literacy rate in Candoshi-Shapra is 10 to 30 percent and 15 to 25 percent in the second language Spanish. There is a Candoshi-Shapra dictionary, and grammar rules have been codified.
Leco, also written as Leko, is a language isolate that, though long reported to be extinct, is spoken by 20–40 individuals in areas east of Lake Titicaca, Bolivia. The Leco ethnic population was 13,527 in 2012.
Andaqui is an extinct language from the southern highlands of Colombia. It has been linked to the Paezan or Barbacoan languages, but no connections have been demonstrated. It was spoken by the Andaqui people of Colombia.
Culle, also spelled Culli, Cullí, or Kulyi, is a poorly attested extinct language of the Andean highlands of northern Peru. It is the original language of the highlands of La Libertad Region, the south of the Cajamarca Region (Cajabamba), and the north of the Ancash region. It is known through various word lists collected while the language was still spoken and through vocabulary loaned into the Spanish spoken in the region.
Quechumaran or Kechumaran is a language-family proposal that unites Quechua and Aymara. Quechuan languages, especially those of the south, share a large amount of vocabulary with Aymara. The hypothesis of the existence of Quechuamara was originally posted by linguist Norman McQuown in 1955. Terrence Kaufman finds the proposal reasonably convincing, but Willem Adelaar, a Quechua specialist, believes the similarities to be caused by borrowing during long-term contact. Lyle Campbell suspects that the proposal is valid but does not consider it to have been conclusively proved.
The Tiniwan languages are two extinct and one moribund language of Colombia that form a small family.
Chimané (Tsimane') is a South American language isolate. Some dialects are known as Mosetén. Chimane is a language of the western Bolivian lowlands spoken by the Tsimane peoples along the Beni River and the region around San Borja in the Department of Beni (Bolivia). Sakel (2004) classifies them as two languages for a number of reasons, yet some of the variants of the language are mutually intelligible and they reportedly have no trouble communicating and were evidently a single language separated recently through cultural contact.
The Timotean languages were spoken in the Venezuelan Andes around what is now Mérida. It is assumed that they are extinct. However, Timote may survive in the so-far unattested Mutú (Loco) language, as this occupies a mountain village (Mutús) within the old Timote state.
Lapachu, also known as Apolista or Aguachile, is an extinct Arawakan language of Bolivia. Aikhenvald (1999) classifies it together with Terena, Moxos, and related languages. It is not clear from surviving descriptions whether it was one language or two.
Harákmbut–Katukinan is a proposal linking the South American indigenous language families Harákmbut and Katukinan. There is reasonably good evidence that the two are related. Jolkesky (2011) also adds Arawan to the family.
Andoque–Urequena is a language family that consists of a pair of languages, Andoque and Urequena. The close relationship of Urequena to Andoque was first recognized by Marcelo Jolkesky.