Xiongnu language

Last updated
Xiongnu
Xiong-nu, Hsiung-nu
Native to Xiongnu Empire
Regioneastern Eurasian Steppe
Ethnicity Xiongnu
Era3rd century BCE-1st century CE? [a]
Dialects
recorded with Chinese characters
Language codes
ISO 639-3 None (mis)
Glottolog xion1234
Hsiung-nu-Empire.png
Map of the Xiongnu Empire, where the Xiongnu language was spoken.

Xiongnu, also referred to as Xiong-nu or Hsiung-nu, is the language(s) presumed to be spoken by the Xiongnu, a people and confederation which existed from the 3rd century BCE to 100 AD. It is sparsely attested, and the extant material available on it comprises about 150 words, as well as what may be a two-line text transcribed using Chinese characters, [6] which the Xiongnu may have used themselves for writing their language. [7]

Contents

Attestation

Apart from tribal and sovereign names, some words, a song in the potentially related Jie language, and Chinese descriptions, the language(s) of the Xiongnu is very poorly documented, and very fragmentarily attested.

Classification

The origin of the Xiongnu is disputed and no theory has more support than another.

Xiongnu, with our current information, is unclassifiable [8] or a language isolate, [9] that is, a language whose relationship with another language is not apparent.

Turkic language

According to Savelyev and Jeong (2020): [10]

The predominant part of the Xiongnu population is likely to have spoken Turkic.

However, on the basis of genetics, the Xiongnu were likely multiethnic. [10]

Wink (2002) suggests that the Xiongnu spoke an ancient form of Turkic, and if they were not Turkic themselves, that they were influenced by Turkic peoples.

Benjamin (2007) proposes that the Xiongnu were either Proto-Turks or Proto-Mongols, and that their language would have been similar to that of the Dingling.

Chinese historical works link the Xiongnu to various Turkic peoples:

(Para-)Yeniseian language

In the 20th century, Lajos Ligeti was the first linguist to hypothesize on the Yeniseian origin of the Xiongnu language. In the early 1960s, Edwin Pulleyblank further developed this theory and added evidence.

The Yeniseian origin theory proposes that the Jie, a Western Xiongnu people, were Yeniseians. [11] Hyun Jin Kim found similarities in a Jie-language song in the Book of Jin (composed during the 7th century) to Yeniseian. [12] [13] [ failed verification ] Pulleyblank and Vovin then affirmed that the Jie were the minority ruling class of the Xiongnu, ruling over the other Turkic and Iranian groups.

According to Kim, the dominant language of the Xiongnu was likely Turkic or Yeniseian, but their empire was multiethnic.

It is possible that Xiongnu nobility titles originated from Yeniseian and were loaned into Turkic and Serbi-Mongolic languages: [9] [14]

Certain Xiongnu words appear to be cognate with Yeniseian: [14] [15]

According to Pulleyblank, the consonant cluster /rl/ appears word-initially in certain Xiongnu words. This indicates that Xiongnu may not have a Turkic origin. Most of the attested vocabulary also appears Yeniseian in nature. [16]

Vovin remarks that certain horse names in Xiongnu appear to be Turkic with Yeniseian prefixes. [14]

Savelyev and Jeong doubt the theory of Yeniseian origin as the Xiongnu genetically correspond to Iranians, unlike Yeniseians, who have a strong Samoyedic affinity. [10]

It is also possible that Xiongnu is linked to Yeniseian in a Para-Yeniseian phylum, both linked in a Xiongnu-Yeniseian family, but others believe it was a Southern Yeniseian language. [15] [17]

As a result, there are two competing models for the classification of Xiongnu into Yeniseian:

Yeniseian model

Yeniseian languages
    • Northern Yeniseian
    • Southern Yeniseian

Para-Yeniseian model

Xiongnu-Yeniseian

(Para-)Mongolic language

Certain linguists posit that the Xiongnu spoke a language similar to Mongolic. According to some Mongolian archaeologists, the people of the slab-grave culture were the ancestors of the Xiongnu, and some scholars believe the Xiongnu were the ancestors of Mongols.

According to Bichurin, the Xianbei and the Xiongnu were the same people, just with different states. [18]

The Book of Wei indicates that the Rouanrouans were descendants of the Donghu. The Book of Liang adds:

They [the Rouanrouans] also constituted a branch of the Xiongnu.

Ancient Chinese sources also designate various nomadic peoples to be the ancestors of the Xiongnu:

Other elements seem to indicate a Mongolic or Serbi-Mongolic origin of the Xiongnu:

Iranian language

On the basis of Xiongnu names of nobility, it was proposed that the Xiongnu spoke an Iranian language.

Beckwith suggests that the name "Xiongnu" is cognate with the word "Scythian", or "Saka", or "Sogdian" (all referring to Central Iranian peoples). [20] [21] According to him, the Iranians directed the Xiongnu and influenced their culture and models. [20]

Harmatta (1994) affirms that Xiongnu names are of Scythian origin, and that Xiongnu would therefore be an Eastern Iranian language.

According to Savelyev et Jeong (2020), ancient Iranians contributed significantly to Xiongnu culture. Additionally, genetic studues indicate that 5% to 25% of Xiongnu were of Iranian origin. [10]

Other possible origins

Other, less developed, hypotheses posit that Xiongnu is of Finno-Ugric [22] or Sino-Tibetan affiliation. [23] It is possible that some eastern Xiongnu peoples may have spoken a Koreanic language. [24] [25] [26] [27]

Multiple languages

A more developed and supported hypothesis than the previous ones indicate a multiethnic origin, and the primary language of the Xiongnu would be too poorly attested to conclude a relationship to any other language. [28]

Geographical location of the Xiongnu empire and the heartland of the Huns. Geographical location of the Xiongnu steppe empire and the heartland of the European Huns.png
Geographical location of the Xiongnu empire and the heartland of the Huns.

Some researchers suggest a linguistic connection between the Huns, Hunas, and the Xiongnu people, [29] However, this is debated, as there is also the possibility that the Huns, despite sharing the same migration route and having relations with the Xiongnu, originated from Indo-European peoples. [30] In 2005, As-Shahbazi suggested that there were originally a Hunnish people who had mixed with Iranian tribes in Transoxiana and Bactria, where they adopted the Kushan-Bactrian language. [31] It should be known that there is no consensus about the linguistic origins of the Huns. Some scholars have suggested that the Huns originated from Mongolic or Turkic groups, making them possibly linguistically distinct from the Xiongnu people. [32] [33]

Contact with Chinese

2nd century BC - 2nd century AD characters of Xiongnu-Xianbei script (Mongolia and Inner Mongolia). Fig6Ishjamts p166R1.gif
2nd century BC – 2nd century AD characters of Xiongnu-Xianbei script (Mongolia and Inner Mongolia).
Bronze seal of a Xiongnu chief, conferred by the Eastern Han government. Inscribed Han Xiong Nu /Gui Yi Qin /Han Chang  ("The Chief of the Han Xiongnu, who have returned to righteousness and embraced the Han"). Seal, impression, and transcription in standard characters. Bronze seal of a Xiongnu chief (seal, reverse image, transcription).jpg
Bronze seal of a Xiongnu chief, conferred by the Eastern Han government. Inscribed 漢匈奴/歸義親/漢長 ("The Chief of the Han Xiongnu, who have returned to righteousness and embraced the Han"). Seal, impression, and transcription in standard characters.

The Xiongnu had mutual contact with the Chinese civilization, and the Chinese were their sole contact with the outside world besides the tribes around them which they were the dominating force above them. [35] In 53 BC, Huhanye (呼韓邪) decided to enter into tributary relations with Han China. [36] The original terms insisted on by the Han court were that, first, the Chanyu or his representatives should come to the capital to pay homage; secondly, the Chanyu should send a hostage prince; and thirdly, the Chanyu should present tribute to the Han emperor. The political status of the Xiongnu in the Chinese world order was reduced from that of a "brotherly state" to that of an "outer vassal" (外臣). One of the most significant inscriptions in the Xiongnu language, found in the Xiongnu capital Longcheng, was written in Chinese characters and spell out *darƣʷa, meaning "leader" or "chief". [37] There also were a Xiongnu inscription unearthed in Buryatia that has Chinese characters written on it, suggesting that Chinese alphabet was in usage in the area of this is result of Han influence via trade networks. [38] Another inscription that uses Chinese characters is located in the loyal tomb complex of the Xiongnu that spells out:

[乘輿][...] [...] [...]年考工工賞造 嗇夫臣康掾臣安主右丞臣 [...] [...]令臣[...]護工卒史臣尊省, It translates: [Fit for use by the emperor] made in the [?] year of the [? era] by the master artisan of the Kaogong imperial workshop Shang. Managed by the workshop overseer, your servant Kang; the lacquer bureau head, your servant An. Inspected by the Assistant Director of the Right, your servant [?]; the Director, your servant [?]; and the Commandery Clerk for Workshop Inspection, your servant Zun. [39]

Xiongnu influence in the Chinese language includes the Chinese word for lipstick (胭脂) which spells out as *'jentsye and derives from the Xiongnu word for wife (閼氏) which is spelled out in the same manner. [40] Several terms in animal husbandry, including names for different species of horses and camels that have uncertain foreign-originating etymologies, also had been suggested to have Xiongnu origins. [41] The name of the Qilian Mountains also originates from Xiongnu. A Xiongnu deity named Jinglu (徑路) was depicted as a sword and the spelling is the same as the Chinese word for "path" or "way". This deity had a temple dedicated to him and the worship included carving gold using the holy knife. [42] [43] [4]

After the dissolution of the Xiongnu, a few tribes remained to exist, which were the tribes of Chuge, Tiefu, Lushuihu, and Yueban. Except for the Yueban, also called the Weak Xiongnu, the rest of the tribes migrated to China and started their own settlements. One of those unique settlements is Tongwancheng, which has a mixed Xiongnu and Chinese etymology, specifically 統萬 (tongwan), a possible cognate with the word tümen which exists in both Turkic and Mongolian, meaning "leading 10,000" or "leading a myriad". [4]

See also

Footnotes

  1. Extinction of standard dialect in the 1st century CE as a result of the collapse of Xiongnu. Recorded survivals in Liang and Xia dialect nomenclature until the 5th Century AD. Recorded survival of Yueban "Weak Xiongnu" until the 8th century CE and subsequent Turkification. [1] [2]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turkic peoples</span> Family of ethnic groups of Eurasia

The Turkic peoples are a collection of diverse ethnic groups of West, Central, East, and North Asia as well as parts of Europe, who speak Turkic languages.

The Five Barbarians, or Wu Hu, is a Chinese historical exonym for five ancient non-Han "Hu" peoples who immigrated to northern China in the Eastern Han dynasty, and then overthrew the Western Jin dynasty and established their own kingdoms in the 4th–5th centuries. The peoples categorized as the Five Barbarians were:

The Xiongnu were a tribal confederation of nomadic peoples who, according to ancient Chinese sources, inhabited the eastern Eurasian Steppe from the 3rd century BC to the late 1st century AD. Modu Chanyu, the supreme leader after 209 BC, founded the Xiongnu Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jie people</span> Historical ethnic group in Chinese history

The Jie were members of a tribe of northern China in the fourth century. During the period of the Sixteen Kingdoms, they were regarded by the Han people as one of the Five Barbarians. Under Shi Le and his family, they established the Later Zhao dynasty which dominated northern China for most of its existence from 319 to 351. The Jie ceased to play a role in Chinese history after Ran Min's culling order and the wars that followed the collapse of Later Zhao, although some historians believe that certain prominent figures from later periods such as Hou Jing and Erzhu Rong may have been descendants of the Jie.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wusun</span> Ancient semi-nomadic people in Central Asia

The Wusun were an ancient semi-nomadic steppe people mentioned in Chinese records from the 2nd century BC to the 5th century AD.

Khan is a historic Turkic and Mongolic title originating among nomadic tribes in the Central and Eastern Eurasian Steppe to refer to a king. It first appears among the Rouran and then the Göktürks as a variant of khagan and implied a subordinate ruler. In the Seljük Empire, it was the highest noble title, ranking above malik (king) and emir (prince). In the Mongol Empire it signified the ruler of a horde (ulus), while the ruler of all the Mongols was the khagan or great khan. It is a title commonly used to signify the head of a Pashtun tribe or clan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rouran Khaganate</span> 330–550 AD Proto-Mongolic state

The Rouran Khaganate, also known as Ruanruan or Juan-juan, was a tribal confederation and later state founded by a people of Proto-Mongolic Donghu origin. The Rouran supreme rulers used the title of khagan, a popular title borrowed from the Xianbei. The Rouran Khaganate lasted from the late 4th century until the middle 6th century with territories that covered all of modern day Mongolia and Inner Mongolia, as well as parts of Manchuria in Northeast China, Eastern Siberia, Xinjiang, and Kazakhstan. The Hephthalites were vassals of the Rouran Khaganate until the beginning of the 5th century, with the royal house of Rourans intermarrying with the royal houses of the Hephthalites. The Rouran Khaganate ended when they were defeated by a Göktürk rebellion at the peak of their power, which subsequently led to the rise of the Turks in world history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yeniseian languages</span> Language family of central Siberia

The Yeniseian languages are a family of languages that are spoken by the Yeniseian people in the Yenisei River region of central Siberia. As part of the proposed Dené–Yeniseian language family, the Yeniseian languages have been argued to be part of "the first demonstration of a genealogical link between Old World and New World language families that meets the standards of traditional comparative-historical linguistics". The only surviving language of the group today is Ket.

Khagan or Qaghan is a title of imperial rank in Turkic, Mongolic, and some other languages, equal to the status of emperor and someone who rules a khaganate (empire). The female equivalent is Khatun.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunnic language</span> Extinct unclassified language of the Huns

The Hunnic language, or Hunnish, was the language spoken by Huns in the Hunnic Empire, a heterogeneous, multi-ethnic tribal confederation which invaded Eastern and Central Europe, and ruled most of Pannonian Eastern Europe, during the 4th and 5th centuries CE. A variety of languages were spoken within the Hun Empire. A contemporary report by Priscus has that Hunnish was spoken alongside Gothic and the languages of other tribes subjugated by the Huns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chanyu</span> Emperor title of the Xiongnu

Chanyu or Shanyu, short for Chengli Gutu Chanyu, was the title used by the supreme rulers of Inner Asian nomads for eight centuries until superseded by the title "Khagan" in 402 CE. The title was most famously used by the ruling Luandi clan of the Xiongnu during the Qin dynasty and Han dynasty. It was later also used infrequently by the Chinese as a reference to Tujue leaders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baghatur</span> Honorific title

Baghatur is a historical Turkic and Mongol honorific title, in origin a term for "hero" or "valiant warrior". The Papal envoy Plano Carpini compared the title with the equivalent of European Knighthood.

The Dingling were an ancient people who appear in Chinese historiography in the context of the 1st century BCE.

Donghu was a tribal confederation of "Hu" (胡) nomadic people that was first recorded from the 7th century BCE and was taken over by the Xiongnu in 150 BCE. They lived in northern Hebei, southeastern Inner Mongolia and the western part of Liaoning, Jilin and Heilongjiang along the Yan Mountains and Greater Khingan Range.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pumpokol language</span> Extinct Yeniseian language

Pumpokol is one of the Yeniseian languages, formerly spoken by the Pumpokol people. It has been extinct since the 18th century. It shares many features with the ancient Xiongnu and Jie languages, and according to Alexander Vovin, Edward Vajda, and Étienne de la Vaissière, is closely related to them. It is poorly attested, the only available lexicon amounting to about 65 words, and some of them have been identified as being Yugh, not Pumpokol.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yenisei Kyrgyz</span> Former state and ethnic population

The Yenisei Kyrgyz, were an ancient Turkic-speaking people who dwelled along the upper Yenisei River in the southern portion of the Minusinsk Depression from the 3rd century BCE to the 13th century CE. The heart of their homeland was the forested Tannu-Ola mountain range, in modern-day Tuva, just north of Mongolia. The Sayan Mountains were also included in their territory at different times. The Yenisei Kyrgyz Khaganate existed from 538 to 1219 CE; in 840, it took over the leadership of the Turkic Khaganate from the Uyghurs, expanding the state from the Yenisei territories into Central Asia and the Tarim Basin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arin language</span> Extinct Yeniseian language of Russia

Arin is an extinct Yeniseian language formerly spoken in Russia along the Yenisei River, predominantly on its left shore, between Yeniseysk and Krasnoyarsk, north of the Minusinsk region. However, it has been suggested that the Arin people had historically occupied a larger geographical range. It became extinct in the 18th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jie language</span> Unclassified extinct language formerly spoken in northeast China

Jie is an unclassified extinct language formerly spoken in northeast China during the Later Zhao dynasty by the Jie people, who were formerly part of the Xiongnu confederation. It has been variously considered to be of either Yeniseian or Turkic affiliation.

The origin of the Huns and their relationship to other peoples identified in ancient sources as Iranian Huns such as the Xionites, the Alchon Huns, the Kidarites, the Hephthalites, the Nezaks, and the Huna, has been the subject of long-term scholarly controversy. Ancient Greek and Roman sources do not provide any information on where the European Huns came from, besides that they suddenly appeared in 370 CE. However, there are some possible mentions of the Huns or tribes related to them that pre-date 370. Chinese sources, meanwhile, indicate several different, sometimes contradictory origins for the various "Iranian Hun" groups. In 1757, Joseph de Guignes first proposed that the Huns and the Iranian Huns were identical to the Xiongnu. The thesis was then popularized by Edward Gibbon. Since that time scholars have debated the proposal on its linguistic, historical, and archaeological merits. In the mid-twentieth century, the connection was attacked by the Sinologist Otto J. Maenchen-Helfen and largely fell out of favor. Some recent scholarship has argued in favor of some form of link, and the theory returned to the mainstream, but there is no consensus on the issue. It also remains disputed whether the various “Iranian Huns” belonged to a single or multiple ethnic groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yeniseian people</span> Indigenous peoples of Central Siberia in Russia

The Yeniseian people refers either to the modern or ancient Siberian populations speaking Yeniseian languages. Despite evidence pointing to the historical presence of Yeniseian populations throughout Central Siberia and Northern Mongolia, only the Ket and Yugh people survive today. The modern Yeniseians live along the eastern middle stretch of the Yenisei River in Northern Siberia. According to the 2021 census, there were 1,088 Kets and 7 Yugs in Russia.

References

  1. Bacot J. "Reconnaissance en Haute Asie Seplentrionale par cinq envoyes ouigours au VIII siecle" // JA, Vol. 254, No 2,. 1956, p.147, in Gumilev L.N., "Ancient Türks", Moscow, 'Science', 1967, Ch.27 http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/OT/ot27.htm (In Russian)
  2. Tishin, V.V (2018). ["Kimäk and Chù-mù-kūn (处木昆): Notes on an Identification" https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2018.46.3.107-113]. p. 108-109
  3. Grousset, Rene (1970). The Empire of the Steppes. Rutgers University Press. pp.  56–57. ISBN   0-8135-1304-9.
  4. 1 2 3 Chen, Sanping (1998). "Sino-Tokharico-Altaica — Two Linguistic Notes". Central Asiatic Journal. 42 (1): 24–43. JSTOR   41928134.
  5. Xiong, Victor (2017). Historical Dictionary of Medieval China. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 315. ISBN   9781442276161.
  6. Vovin 2000, p. 87.
  7. Vovin, Alexander (2020). "Two Newly Found Xiōng-nú Inscriptions and Their Significance for the Early Linguistic History of Central Asia". International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics. 2 (2): 315–322. doi:10.1163/25898833-12340036. ISSN   2589-8825.
  8. "Glottolog 4.6 - Xiong-Nu". glottolog.org. Retrieved 2022-08-21.
  9. 1 2 Di Cosmo 2004, p. 164.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Savelyev & Jeong 2020.
  11. Vovin, Edward Vajda & Étienne de la Vaissière 2016.
  12. Hyun Jin Kim 2013.
  13. Hyun Jin Kim 2015.
  14. 1 2 3 Vovin 2003.
  15. 1 2 Vovin 2015.
  16. Pulleyblank, Edwin George (1963). "The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Part II" (PDF). Asia Major. 9: 264. Retrieved 2011-02-06.
  17. Vovin 2000, p. 87-104.
  18. N. Bichurin 1950.
  19. Miller, Bryan (2009). "Elite Xiongnu Burials at the Periphery: Tomb Complexes at Takhiltyn Khotgor, Mongolian Altai (Miller et al. 2009)". Academia. Retrieved 2022-08-21.
  20. 1 2 Beckwith 2009, p. 71-73.
  21. Beckwith 2009, p. 405.
  22. Di Cosmo 2004, p. 166.
  23. Jingyi Gao 高晶一 (2017). "Xia and Ket Identified by Sinitic and Yeniseian Shared Etymologies // 確定夏國及凱特人的語言為屬於漢語族和葉尼塞語系共同詞源". Central Asiatic Journal. 60 (1–2): 51–58. doi:10.13173/centasiaj.60.1-2.0051 . Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  24. "騎馬흉노국가 新羅 연구趙甲濟(月刊朝鮮 편집장)의 심층취재". monthly.chosun.com (in Korean). 2004-03-05. Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  25. 교수, 김운회 동양대 (2005-08-30). "금관의 나라, 신라". www.pressian.com (in Korean). Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  26. 조선일보 (2020-08-04). "경주 사천왕사(寺) 사천왕상(四天王像) 왜 4개가 아니라 3개일까". 조선일보 (in Korean). Archived from the original on December 30, 2014. Retrieved 2024-06-30.
  27. "자료검색>상세_기사 | 국립중앙도서관" (in Korean). 2018-10-02. Archived from the original on 2018-10-02. Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  28. Di Cosmo 2004, p. 165.
  29. Vaissière, Étienne. "Xiongnu". Encyclopedia Iranica..
  30. Maenchen-Helfen, Otto J. (1944–1945). "Huns and Hsiung-Nu". Byzantion, Vol. 17: 222–243..
  31. Parker, Edward Harper (1896). "The Origin of the Turks". The English Historical Review. 11 (43): 431–445. ISSN   0013-8266. JSTOR   547136.
  32. Taşağıl, Ahmet (1 May 2005). "TURKISH - MONGOLIAN RELATIONS IN THE EARLY PERIOD". Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 7 (13): 20–24. ISSN   1694-5093.
  33. Psarras, Sophia-Karin (2 February 2015). Han Material Culture: An Archaeological Analysis and Vessel Typology. Cambridge University Press. p. 19. ISBN   978-1-316-27267-1 via Google Books.
  34. Kim, Hyun Jin (29 March 2017). "The Xiongnu". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.50. ISBN   978-0-19-027772-7.
  35. Grousset 1970, pp.  37–38.
  36. Vovin, Alexander (1 December 2020). "Two Newly Found Xiōng-nú Inscriptions and Their Significance for the Early Linguistic History of Central Asia". International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics. 2 (2): 315–322. doi:10.1163/25898833-12340036.
  37. Otani, Ikue (1 July 2020). "A reconsideration of a Chinese inscription carved on lacquerware unearthed from Barrow No. 7 of the Tsaram Xiongnu cemetery (Buryatia, Russia): new reflections on the organization of the central workshops of the Han". Asian Archaeology. 3 (1–2): 59–70. doi:10.1007/s41826-019-00025-y.
  38. Miniaev, Sergey. "Investigation of a Xiongnu Royal Tomb Complex in the Tsaraam Valley".
  39. Zhingwei, Feng. "发表于《Aspects of Foreign Words/Loanwords in the Word's language》 (The Multi-Faceted Nature of Language Policies that Aim to Standardize and Revive Language), Proceedings for 11th International Symposium, The National Institute for Japanese Language, p200-229, 2004, Tokyo" (PDF).
  40. Şengül, Fatih (1 January 2020). "The Horse-Related Terms and Animal Names in the Language of Xiongnus (Asian Huns)".
  41. Schuessler, Axel. "Phonological Notes on Hàn Period Transcriptions of Foreign Names and Words" in Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics 53.
  42. Miller, Bryan K. (2024). Xiongnu: The World's First Nomadic Empire. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-008369-4.

Bibliography