Sawi language (Dardic)

Last updated
Sawi
Native to Afghanistan, Pakistan
Native speakers
9,000 (2021) [1]
Language codes
ISO 639-3 sdg
Glottolog savi1242
ELP Savi

Sawi, Savi, or Sauji, [2] is an endangered [3] Indo-Aryan language spoken in northeastern Afghanistan and north-western Pakistan. [4] It is classified as a member of the Shina language cluster within the Dardic subgroup.

Contents

It is spoken in the village of Sau, on the east bank of the Kunar River, around 20 kilometres (12 mi) south of the town of Arandu, which is on the border with Pakistan's Chitral region. [5] Sawi speakers consider themselves part of the Gawar ethnic group, which is found in half a dozen of the surrounding villages and whose language is Gawarbati. In communicating with them, the people of Sau reportedly resort to using Pashto. [6] During the long period of unrest, the population of the village was displaced into refugee camps in Chitral and Dir, but reportedly many people have now returned to Afghanistan. [5]

History

The closest relative of the Sawi language is the southern variety of Palula spoken in Ashret further up the Kunar Valley in Chitral. Many Sawi speakers are aware of the similarity between the two languages, and some consider the people of Ashret as their "brothers". [7] Henrik Liljegren's study of the shared linguistic features and the local oral traditions suggest that the ancestors of these language communities are likely to have migrated from the present-day Diamer District on the Indus River. There was probably an early split between Northern and Southern Palula, with Sawi subsequently branching off from the latter. [8] The current similarity between the two varieties of Palula is then explained as a result of convergence.

Grammar

The presence of weak voiced aspirates (bh, dh, gh) was cautiously reported by Buddruss in 1967, [9] but Liljegren (2009 , p. 31) found them to be absent from the speech of his consultant(s). It is likely that the loss of aspiration in the ancestor language could have been related to the development of a tone system. [10]

Possibly under the influence of Gawarbati, [11] Sawi has developed a voiceless lateral fricative ɬ out of the *tr consonant clusters of the earlier language, compare for example Sawi ɬo with Southern Palula tróo 'three'. [12]

Unlike the main Shina varieties, where the past and present tense are typically marked for person, Sawi and Palula verb tenses are almost entirely participle-based, with only traces of agreement for person. [13] Like Torwali, Sawi has grammaticalised the category of animacy in its nominal morphology (in contrast to Kalasha, Khowar, Shumashti and Pashai, where animacy has instead been grammaticalised in the verbal morphology). [14] The agent suffix is -e for perfective transitive verbs. Unlike the main Shina varieties, Sawi does not seem to possess an agent suffix for imperfective transitive verbs. [15]

Related Research Articles

In linguistics, an object is any of several types of arguments. In subject-prominent, nominative-accusative languages such as English, a transitive verb typically distinguishes between its subject and any of its objects, which can include but are not limited to direct objects, indirect objects, and arguments of adpositions ; the latter are more accurately termed oblique arguments, thus including other arguments not covered by core grammatical roles, such as those governed by case morphology or relational nouns . In ergative-absolutive languages, for example most Australian Aboriginal languages, the term "subject" is ambiguous, and thus the term "agent" is often used instead to contrast with "object", such that basic word order is often spoken of in terms such as Agent-Object-Verb (AOV) instead of Subject-Object-Verb (SOV). Topic-prominent languages, such as Mandarin, focus their grammars less on the subject-object or agent-object dichotomies but rather on the pragmatic dichotomy of topic and comment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuristanis</span> Ethnic group of Afghanistan and Pakistan

The Nuristanis, formerly known as Kafiristanis, are an ethnic group native to the Nuristan Province of northeastern Afghanistan and Chitral District of northwestern Pakistan. Their languages comprise the Nuristani branch of Indo-Iranian languages. The Nuristanis reside mainly in the northeast of Afghanistan and northwest of Pakistan; between the Pashtun tribes of Kunar, Kalash in Pakistan's Chitral, and Tajiks of Badakhshan in the north.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Balti language</span> Tibetic language of Baltistan, Pakistan

Balti is a Tibetic language natively spoken by the ethnic Balti people in the Baltistan region of Gilgit−Baltistan, Pakistan, Nubra Valley of the Leh district and in the Kargil district of Ladakh, India. The language differs from Standard Tibetan; many sounds of Old Tibetan that were lost in Standard Tibetan are retained in the Balti language. It also has a simple pitch accent system only in multi-syllabic words while Standard Tibetan has a complex and distinct pitch system that includes tone contour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blackfoot language</span> Indigenous American language

The Blackfoot language, also called Siksiká, often anglicised as Siksika, is an Algonquian language spoken by the Blackfoot or Niitsitapi people, who currently live in the northwestern plains of North America. There are four dialects, three of which are spoken in Alberta, Canada, and one of which is spoken in the United States: Siksiká (Blackfoot), to the southeast of Calgary, Alberta; Kainai, spoken in Alberta between Cardston and Lethbridge; Aapátohsipikani, to the west of Fort MacLeod which is Brocket (Piikani) and Aamsskáápipikani, in northwestern Montana. The name Blackfoot probably comes from the blackened soles of the leather shoes that the people wore.

In linguistics, morphosyntactic alignment is the grammatical relationship between arguments—specifically, between the two arguments of transitive verbs like the dog chased the cat, and the single argument of intransitive verbs like the cat ran away. English has a subject, which merges the more active argument of transitive verbs with the argument of intransitive verbs, leaving the object distinct; other languages may have different strategies, or, rarely, make no distinction at all. Distinctions may be made morphologically, syntactically, or both.

Gāndhārī is the modern name, coined by scholar Harold Walter Bailey, for a Prakrit language found mainly in texts dated between the 3rd century BCE and 4th century CE in the region of Gandhāra, located in the northwestern Indian subcontinent. The language was heavily used by the former Buddhist cultures of Central Asia and has been found as far away as eastern China, in inscriptions at Luoyang and Anyang.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dardic languages</span> Subgroup of Indo-Aryan languages

The Dardic languages or Hindu-Kush Indo-Aryan languages, are a group of several Indo-Aryan languages spoken in northern Pakistan, northwestern India and parts of northeastern Afghanistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pashayi people</span> Ethnic group in Afghanistan

Pashayi or Pashai are an Indo-Aryan ethnolinguistic group living primarily in eastern Afghanistan. They are mainly concentrated in the northern parts of Laghman and Nangarhar, also parts of Kunar, Kapisa, Parwan, Nuristan, and a bit of Panjshir. Many Pashai consider themselves as Pashtuns speaking a special language, and many are bilingual in Pashto.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Khowar language</span> Indo-Aryan language of Pakistan

Khowar or Chitrali, is an Indo-Aryan language primarily spoken in Chitral and surrounding areas in Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dameli language</span> Indo-Aryan language spoken in Pakistan

Dameli (دَميلي), also Damia, Damiabaasha or Gidoj, is an Indo-Aryan language of the Dardic subgroup spoken by approximately 5,000 people in the Domel Town, in the Chitral District of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chitral Kalasha language</span> Indo-Aryan language spoken in Pakistan

Kalasha is an Indo-Aryan language spoken by the Kalash people, in the Chitral District in Pakistan. There are an estimated 4,100 speakers of Kalasha. It is an endangered language and there is an ongoing language shift to Khowar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palula language</span> Indo-Aryan language spoken in the Chitral District Pakistan

Palula and also known as Ashreti (Aćharêtâʹ) or Dangarikwar, is an Indo-Aryan language spoken by approximately 10,000 people in the valleys of Ashret and Biori, as well as in the village of Puri in the Shishi valley and at least by a portion of the population in the village Kalkatak, in the Chitral District of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gawar-Bati language</span> Indo-Aryan language spoken in Afghanistan and Pakistan

Gawar-Bati or Narsati is an Indo-Aryan language spoken in the Chitral region of northern Pakistan, and across the border in Afghanistan. It is also known as Aranduyiwar in Chitral because it is spoken in Arandu, which is the last village in lower Chitral and is also across the border from Berkot in Afghanistan. There are about 9,000 speakers of Gawar-Bati, with 1,500 in Pakistan, and 7,500 in Afghanistan. The name Gawar-Bati means "speech of the Gawar", a people detailed by the Cacopardos in their study of the Hindu Kush.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shina language</span> Indo-Aryan language primarily spoken in Gilgit-Baltistan and Gurez valley

Shina is an Indo-Aryan language spoken by the Shina people. In Pakistan, Shina is the major language in Gilgit-Baltistan spoken by an estimated 1,146,000 people living mainly in Gilgit-Baltistan and Kohistan. A small community of Shina speakers is also found in India, in the Guraiz valley of Jammu and Kashmir and in Dras valley of Ladakh. Outliers of Shina language such as Brokskat are found in Ladakh, Kundal Shahi in Azad Kashmir, Palula and Sawi in Chitral, Ushojo in the Swat Valley and Kalkoti in Dir.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shina people</span> Ethnolinguistic group in South Asia

The Shina are an Indo-Aryan ethnolinguistic group primarily residing in Gilgit–Baltistan and Indus Kohistan in Pakistan, as well as in the Dras Valley and Kishenganga Valley (Gurez) in the northern region of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh in India. They speak an Indo-Aryan language, called Shina and their geographic area of predominance is referred to as Shenaki.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jadgali language</span> Indo-Aryan language spoken on Iranian Plateau

Jaḍgālī is an Indo-Aryan language spoken by the Jadgal, an ethno-linguistic group of Pakistan and Iran. It is one of only two Indo-Aryan languages found on the Iranian plateau. It is a dialect of Sindhi most closely related to Lasi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kalkoti language</span> Indo-Aryan language of Pakistan

Kalkoti, also known as Goedijaa, is an Indo-Aryan language spoken in the Kalkot Tehsil, in the Upper Dir district in Pakistan.

Elena Bashir is an American linguist and senior lecturer in the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilizations of the Humanities Division of the University of Chicago. She studies languages of Pakistan and the broader northwestern part of South Asia, and has published extensive linguistic work on the Dardic languages, Hindko, Saraiki, Balochi, Brahui, Wakhi and Hindustani, among other languages of the region. Bashir also teaches Urdu.

The Palula, or Dangerik, also known as the Ashreti or Biori are an Indo-Aryan ethnic group who inhabit Ashret and parts of the former Chitral district, primarily in the south.

Beori is a valley located in Upper Chitral District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. It meets the Kunar River and there are three villages located in the valley, including Drosh. It is located at 35°28′24″N71°48′2″E according to Henrik Liljegren, a linguist. It is located at the Hindu Raj range from the southeast. The Chitral River also meets the valley.

References

  1. Sawi at Ethnologue (25th ed., 2022) Closed Access logo transparent.svg
  2. Sauji is the endonym reported in Liljegren (2009 , p. 10)
  3. Bashir 2016b, pp. 640–41.
  4. "Savi". Ethnologue. Retrieved 2022-06-12.
  5. 1 2 Liljegren 2009, p. 10.
  6. Cacopardo & Cacopardo 2001, pp. 96, 231–32.
  7. Liljegren 2009, pp. 11, 55.
  8. Liljegren 2009; see particularly pp. 54–58
  9. Buddruss 1967, p. 22.
  10. Liljegren 2009 , pp. 34–35, 41. Cf. the analysis of Kolkati in Liljegren 2013 , pp. 143–44
  11. Liljegren 2009, pp. 40–41.
  12. Liljegren 2009, pp. 34, 36.
  13. Liljegren 2013, p. 153.
  14. Bashir 2016a, p. 266, n. 33.
  15. Schmidt & Kaul 2008, p. 249.

Bibliography