Indo-Aryan superstrate in Mitanni

Last updated

Some loanwords in the variant of the Hurrian language spoken in Mitanni during the 2nd millennium BCE are identifiable as originating in an Indo-Aryan language; these are considered to constitute an Indo-Aryan superstrate in Mitanni (or in Mitanni Hurrian). The words are theonyms, proper names and technical terminology related to horses (hippological). [1]

Contents

It is generally believed that Indo-Aryan peoples settled in Upper Mesopotamia and northern Syria, and established the kingdom of Mitanni following a period of political vacuum, while also adopting Hurrian. This is considered a part of the Indo-Aryan migrations. [2] [3] [4]

Linguistic context

Professor Eva von Dassow concurs with the presence of Indo-Aryan terms in Mitanni vocabulary, but cautiously advises against the notion of an "Indo-Aryan takeover". [5] Michael Witzel argues for the antiquity of the Indo-Aryan words attested in the Mitanni data, since they almost certainly predate linguistic developments attested in the Rigveda. [6]

In a treaty between the Hittites and Mitanni (between Suppiluliuma I and Shattiwaza, c. 1380 BC), the deities Mitra, Varuna, Indra, and Nasatya (Ashvins) are invoked. Kikkuli's horse training text (circa 1400 BC) includes technical terms such as aika (Vedic Sanskrit eka, one), tera (tri, three), panza (pañca, five), satta (sapta, seven), na (nava, nine), vartana (vartana, round). The numeral aika "one" is of particular importance because it places the superstrate in the vicinity of Indo-Aryan proper (Vedic Sanskrit eka, with regular contraction of /ai/ to [eː]) as opposed to Indo-Iranian or early Iranian (which has *aiva; compare Vedic eva "only") in general. [7]

A document from Nuzi has babru(-nnu) (babhru, brown), parita(-nnu) (palita, grey), and pinkara(-nnu) (pingala, red) for horse colours. Their chief festival was the celebration of the solstice (vishuva) which was common in most cultures in the ancient world.

The Mitanni warriors were called marya (Hurrian: maria-nnu), the term for '(young) warrior' in Sanskrit as well, [8] formed by adding the Hurrian suffix -nnu; [9] note 'mišta-nnu' (= miẓḍha,~ Sanskrit mīḍha) "payment (for catching a fugitive)". [10]

Sanskritic interpretations of Mitanni names render Artashumara (artaššumara) as Arta-smara "who thinks of Arta/Ṛta", [11] Biridashva (biridašṷa, biriiašṷa) as Prītāśva "whose horse is dear", [12] Priyamazda (priiamazda) as Priyamedha "whose wisdom is dear", [13] [14] Citrarata as Citraratha "whose chariot is shining", [15] Indaruda/Endaruta as Indrota "helped by Indra", [16] Shativaza (šattiṷaza) as Sātivāja "winning the race prize", [17] Šubandu as Subandhu "having good relatives" (a name in Palestine [18] ), Tushratta (tṷišeratta, tušratta, etc.) as *tṷaišaratha, Vedic Tveṣaratha "whose chariot is vehement". [19]

Attested words and comparisons

All of the following examples are from Witzel (2001). [20] For the pronunciation of the sounds transcribed from cuneiform as š and z, see Proto-Semitic language#Fricatives.

Names of people

Transcription of cuneiformInterpretation Vedic equivalentComments
bi-ir-ya-ma-aš-daPriyamazdha Priya medha"whose wisdom is dear"; /azd(ʰ)/ to [eːd(ʰ)] is a regular development in Vedic and its descendants (Indo-Aryan in the narrow sense)
bi-ir-ya-aš-šu-wa, bi-ir-da-aš-šu-waPriyāśva ~ PrītāśvaPrītāśva"whose horse is dear"
ar-ta-aš-šu-ma-raArtasmaraṚtasmara"who thinks of Arta/Ṛta"
ar-ta-ta-a-maArtadhāma(n?)Ṛtadhāman"his abode is Ṛta"
tu-uš-rat-ta, tu-iš-e-rat-ta, tu-uš-e-rat-taTvaiša(?)ratha Tveṣáratha"whose chariot is vehement"
in-tar-ú-da, en-dar-ú-ta Indrauta Indrota"helped by Indra"; /au/ to [oː] is a regular development in Vedic; ú specifically indicates [u] as opposed to [o]

Names of deities

From treaties of Mitanni.

Transcription of cuneiformInterpretation Vedic equivalentComments
a-ru-na, ú-ru-wa-naVaruna Varuna
mi-it-raMitra Mitra
in-tar, in-da-raIndra Indra
na-ša-ti-ya-an-naNasatya(-nna) Nasatya Hurrian grammatical ending -nna
a-ak-ni-išĀgnis Agni only attested in Hittite, which retains nominative -/s/ and lengthens stressed syllables

Horse training

From Kikkuli.

Transcription of cuneiformInterpretation Vedic equivalentComments
a-aš-šu-uš-ša-an-niāśva-san-ni?aśva-sana-"master horse trainer" (Kikkuli himself)
-aš-šu-wa-aśva aśva "horse"; in personal names
a-i-ka-aika-eka"1"
ti-e-ra-tera- ?tri"3"
pa-an-za-pańća- ?pañca"5"; Vedic c is not an affricate,[ citation needed ] but apparently its Mitanni equivalent was
ša-at-tasattasapta"7"; /pt/ to /tː/ is either an innovation in Mitanni or a misinterpretation by a scribe who had Hurrian šinti "7" in mind
na-a-[w]a-nāva-nava"9"
wa-ar-ta-an-navartan(n)avartanaround, turn

Other lexicon

The following table includes the remaining lexicon, considered to attest horse colours. [21]

Transcription of cuneiformInterpretation Vedic equivalentComments
ba-ab-ru-un-nu [22] papru-nnu or babru-nnubabhrú-'brown'
pi2-in-ka4-ra-an-nu [23] pinkara-nnu or bingara-nnupiṅgalá-'reddish brown'
pa2-ri-it-ta-an-nu [24] paritta-nnu or baritta-nnupalitá-'gray'

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indo-Aryan languages</span> Branch of the Indo-Iranian languages

The Indo-Aryan languages are a branch of the Indo-Iranian languages in the Indo-European language family. As of the early 21st century, they have more than 800 million speakers, primarily concentrated east of the Indus river in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Maldives and Nepal. Moreover, apart from the Indian subcontinent, large immigrant and expatriate Indo-Aryan–speaking communities live in Northwestern Europe, Western Asia, North America, the Caribbean, Southeast Africa, Polynesia and Australia, along with several million speakers of Romani languages primarily concentrated in Southeastern Europe. There are over 200 known Indo-Aryan languages.

Mitra is the name of an Indo-Iranian divinity that predates the Rigvedic Mitrá and Avestan Mithra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mitanni</span> Ancient Hurrian-speaking state in northern Syria and southeast Anatolia

Mitanni, earlier called Ḫabigalbat in old Babylonian texts, c. 1600 BC; Hanigalbat or Hani-Rabbat in Assyrian records, or Naharin in Egyptian texts, was a Hurrian-speaking state in northern Syria and southeast Anatolia with Indo-Aryan linguistic and political influences. Since no histories, royal annals or chronicles have yet been found in its excavated sites, knowledge about Mitanni is sparse compared to the other powers in the area, and dependent on what its neighbours commented in their texts.

Vedic Sanskrit, also simply referred as the Vedic language, is an ancient language of the Indo-Aryan subgroup of the Indo-European language family. It is attested in the Vedas and related literature compiled over the period of the mid-2nd to mid-1st millennium BCE. It is orally preserved, predating the advent of writing by several centuries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waššukanni</span> Capital of the Hurrian kingdom of Mitanni

Waššukanni or Aššukanni was the capital of the Hurrian kingdom of Mitanni, from around 1500 BC to the 13th century BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tushratta</span> 14th-century BCE king of Mitanni

Tushratta was a king of Mitanni, c. 1358–1335 BCE, at the end of the reign of Amenhotep III and throughout the reign of Akhenaten. He was the son of Shuttarna II. Tushratta stated that he was the grandson of Artatama I. His sister Gilukhipa and his daughter Tadukhipa were married to the Egyptian pharaoh Amenhotep III; Tadukhipa later married Akhenaten who took over his father's royal harem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teshub</span> Hurrian weather god and king of the gods

Teshub was the Hurrian weather god, as well as the head of the Hurrian pantheon. The etymology of his name is uncertain, though it is agreed it can be classified as linguistically Hurrian. Both phonetic and logographic writings are attested. As a deity associated with the weather, Teshub could be portrayed both as destructive and protective. Individual weather phenomena, including winds, lightning, thunder and rain, could be described as his weapons. He was also believed to enable the growth of vegetation and create rivers and springs. His high position in Hurrian religion reflected the widespread importance of weather gods in northern Mesopotamia and nearby areas, where in contrast with the south agriculture relied primarily on rainfall rather than irrigation. It was believed that his authority extended to both mortal and other gods, both on earth and in heaven. However, the sea and the underworld were not under his control. Depictions of Teshub are rare, though it is agreed he was typically portrayed as an armed, bearded figure, sometimes holding a bundle of lightning. One such example is known from Yazılıkaya. In some cases, he was depicted driving in a chariot drawn by two sacred bulls.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kušuḫ</span> Hurrian lunar god

Kušuḫ, also known under the name Umbu, was the god of the moon in Hurrian pantheon. He is attested in cuneiform texts from many sites, from Hattusa in modern Turkey, through Ugarit, Alalakh, Mari and other locations in Syria, to Nuzi, located near modern Kirkuk in Iraq, but known sources do not indicate that he was associated with a single city. His name might be derived from the toponym Kuzina, possibly the Hurrian name of Harran, a city in Upper Mesopotamia, but both this etymology and identification of this sparsely attested place name remain uncertain. He was a popular, commonly worshiped god, and many theophoric names invoking him are known. In addition to serving as a divine representation of the moon, he was also associated with oaths, oracles and pregnancy. Some aspects of his character were likely influenced by his Mesopotamian counterpart Sin, while he in turn was an influence on the Ugaritic god Yarikh and Luwian Arma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indo-Iranians</span> Historical group of Indo-European peoples

The Indo-Iranian peoples, also known as Ā́rya or Aryans from their self-designation, were a group of Indo-European speaking peoples who brought the Indo-Iranian languages to major parts of Eurasia in waves from the first part of the 2nd millennium BC onwards. They eventually branched out into the Iranian peoples and Indo-Aryan peoples.

The Indo-Aryan migrations were the migrations into the Indian subcontinent of Indo-Aryan peoples, an ethnolinguistic group that spoke Indo-Aryan languages. These are the predominant languages of today's Bangladesh, Maldives, Nepal, North India, Eastern Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manfred Mayrhofer</span> Austrian linguist (1926–2011)

Manfred Mayrhofer was an Austrian Indo-Europeanist who specialized in Indo-Iranian languages. Mayrhofer served as professor emeritus at the University of Vienna. He is noted for his etymological dictionary of Sanskrit.

Brugmann's law, named for Karl Brugmann, is a sound law stating that in the Indo-Iranian languages, the earlier Proto-Indo-European *o normally became *a in Proto-Indo-Iranian but *ā in open syllables if it was followed by one consonant and another vowel. For example, the Proto-Indo-European noun for 'wood' was *dόru, which in Vedic became dāru. Everywhere else, the outcome was *a, the same as the reflexes of PIE *e and *a.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maryannu</span>

The Maryannu were a caste of chariot-mounted hereditary warrior nobility that existed in many of the societies of the Ancient Near East during the Bronze Age. Maryannu is a Hurrianized Indo-Aryan word, formed by adding Hurrian suffix -nni to Indo-Aryan root márya, meaning "(young) man" or a "young warrior". Philologist Martin West suggested that the name Meriones, a character in Homeric epic, is "identical" to maryannu. Thus, Mērionēs would be the Homeric Greek version of the term, reflected in pre-Mycenaean poetic verse as Mārionās.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matsya (tribe)</span> Ancient Hindu kingdom of India

Matsya was an ancient Indo-Aryan tribe of central South Asia whose existence is attested during the Iron Age. The members of the Matsya tribe were called the Mātsyeyas and were organised into a kingdom called the Matsya kingdom.

Vedic Sanskrit has a number of linguistic features which are alien to most other Indo-European languages. Prominent examples include: phonologically, the introduction of retroflexes, which alternate with dentals, and morphologically, the formation of gerunds. Some philologists attribute such features, as well as the presence of non-Indo-European vocabulary, to a local substratum of languages encountered by Indo-Aryan peoples in Central Asia (Bactria-Marghiana) and within the Indian subcontinent during Indo-Aryan migrations, including the Dravidian languages.

Indigenous Aryanism, also known as the Indigenous Aryans theory (IAT) and the Out of India theory (OIT), is the conviction that the Aryans are indigenous to the Indian subcontinent, and that the Indo-European languages radiated out from a homeland in India into their present locations. It is a "religio-nationalistic" view on Indian history, and propagated as an alternative to the established migration model, which considers the Pontic–Caspian steppe to be the area of origin of the Indo-European languages.

Proto-Indo-Iranian paganism was the beliefs of the speakers of Proto-Indo-Iranian and includes topics such as the mythology, legendry, folk tales, and folk beliefs of early Indo-Iranian culture. By way of the comparative method, Indo-Iranian philologists, a variety of historical linguist, have proposed reconstructions of entities, locations, and concepts with various levels of security in early Indo-Iranian folklore and mythology. The present article includes both reconstructed forms and proposed motifs from the Proto-Indo-Iranian period, generally associated with the Sintashta culture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vedic period</span> Ancient South Asian historical period

The Vedic period, or the Vedic age, is the period in the late Bronze Age and early Iron Age of the history of India when the Vedic literature, including the Vedas, was composed in the northern Indian subcontinent, between the end of the urban Indus Valley Civilisation and a second urbanisation, which began in the central Indo-Gangetic Plain c. 600 BCE. The Vedas are liturgical texts which formed the basis of the influential Brahmanical ideology, which developed in the Kuru Kingdom, a tribal union of several Indo-Aryan tribes. The Vedas contain details of life during this period that have been interpreted to be historical and constitute the primary sources for understanding the period. These documents, alongside the corresponding archaeological record, allow for the evolution of the Indo-Aryan and Vedic culture to be traced and inferred.

Proto-Indo-Aryan is the reconstructed proto-language of the Indo-Aryan languages. It is intended to reconstruct the language of the Proto-Indo-Aryans, who had migrated into the Indian subcontinent. Being descended from Proto-Indo-Iranian, it has the characteristics of a satem language.

References

  1. Kümmel 2022, p. 246.
  2. Sigfried J. de Laet 1996, p. 562.
  3. Beckwith 2009, pp. 39–41.
  4. Bryce 2005, p. 55.
  5. Dassow 2014, pp. 12–14.
  6. Witzel 2001, pp. 5 and footnote nr. 8, 36, 49, 53–55.
  7. Fournet 2010, pp. 26–40.
  8. Mayrhofer 1998, p. 293.
  9. Dassow 2014, p. 27.
  10. Mayrhofer 1998, Entry "mīḍha". p. 358.
  11. Mayrhofer 1998, Entry "SMAR". p. 780.
  12. Mayrhofer 1998, p. 182.
  13. Mayrhofer 1998, Entry "priyá-". p. 189.
  14. Mayrhofer 1998, Entry "medhắ-". p. 378.
  15. Mayrhofer 1992, p. 553.
  16. Mayrhofer 1992, pp. 134.
  17. Mayrhofer 1998, pp. 540, 696.
  18. Mayrhofer 1998, pp. 209, 735.
  19. Mayrhofer 1992, pp. 686, 736.
  20. Witzel 2001, pp. 1–115.
  21. Deshpande, Madhav M. (1995). "Vedic Aryans, non-Vedic Aryans, and non-Aryans: Judging the linguistic evidence of the Veda". In George Erdosy (ed.). The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 67-84 [71]. doi:10.1515/9783110816433-008.
  22. Kogan, Leonid; Krebernik, Manfred (2020). Etymological Dictionary of Akkadian. Vol. 1: Roots beginning with p and b. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. p. 392. doi:10.1515/9781614512394.
  23. Kogan, Leonid; Krebernik, Manfred (2020). Etymological Dictionary of Akkadian. Vol. 1: Roots beginning with p and b. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. p. 372. doi:10.1515/9781614512394.
  24. Kogan, Leonid; Krebernik, Manfred (2020). Etymological Dictionary of Akkadian. Vol. 1: Roots beginning with p and b. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 348–349. doi:10.1515/9781614512394.

Sources

Further reading