Chakhar Mongolian

Last updated
Chakhar
Chahar
ᠴᠠᠬᠠᠷ
Pronunciation[ˈt͡ɕʰɑχə̆r]
Native to Inner Mongolia
Ethnicity Chahars
Native speakers
100 000 (2003, Chakhar proper)
Traditional Mongolian
Official status
Official language in
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg  China
Regulated by Council for Language and Literature Work [1]
Language codes
ISO 639-3
Glottolog chah1241
IETF mn-u-sd-cnnm
Chakhar.png
Subdivisions of Xilingol (orange) and Ulanqab (green) in which Chakhar is spoken (lighter shade).

Chakhar [a] is a variety of Mongolian spoken in the central region of Inner Mongolia. It is phonologically close to Khalkha and is the basis for the standard pronunciation of Mongolian in Inner Mongolia.

Contents

Location and classification

There are three different definitions of the word Chakhar. First, there is Chakhar proper, spoken in Xilingol League in the Plain Blue Banner, Plain and Bordered White Banner, Bordered Yellow Banner, Taibus Banner in Dolonnuur, and in Ulanqab in Chakhar Right Rear Banner, Chakhar Right Middle Banner, Chakhar Right Front Banner, Shangdu and Huade, with a number of approximately 100,000 speakers. [2]

In a broader definition, the Chakhar group contains the varieties Chakhar proper, Urat, Darkhan, Muumingan, Dörben Küüket, Keshigten of Ulanqab. [3] In a very broad and controversial definition, it also contains the dialects of Xilingol League such as Üjümchin, Sönit, Abaga, and Shilinhot. [4] The Inner Mongolian normative pronunciation is based on the variety of Chakhar proper as spoken in the Shuluun Köke banner. [5]

Phonology

Excluding the phonology of recent loanwords, Chakhar has the pharyngeal vowel phonemes /ɑ/,/ɪ/,/ɔ/,/ʊ/ and the non-pharyngeal vowel phonemes /ə/,/i/,/o/,/u/ that adhere to vowel harmony. All have long counterparts and some diphthongs exist as well. /ɪ/ has phonemic status only due to its occurrence as word-initial vowel in words like /ˈɪlɑ̆x/ 'to win' (vs. /ˈɑlɑ̆x/ 'to kill'), [6] thus /i/ (<*i) does occur in pharyngeal words as well. Through lexical diffusion, /i/ <*e is to be observed in some words such as /in/ < *ene ‘this’, rather than in /ələ/ 'kite (bird)'. However, long monophthong vowels also include /e/ < *ei. [7] The maximal syllable structure is CVCC. [8] In word-final position, non-phonemic vowels often appear after aspirated and sometimes after unaspirated consonants. They are more frequent in male speech and almost totally disappear in compounds. [9] The consonant phonemes (excluding loanwords) are shown in the table below.

LabialAlveolarPalatalVelar
PlainPalatalisedPlainPalatalisedPlainPalatalised
Nasal m n ŋ
PlosiveVoiced b d ɡ ɡʲ
Voiceless p t ( k ) [b]
Fricative s ʃ x
Affricate t͡ʃ , d͡ʒ
Liquid( w ) [b] l j
Trill r

Palatalized vowels have phoneme status only in pharyngeal words. [11] [12]

Word classes and morphology

The case system of Chakhar has the same number of morphemes as Khalkha with approximately the same forms. There is a peculiar Allative case suffix, -ʊd/-ud, that has developed from *ödö (Mongolian script <ödege>) 'upwards' and that seems to be a free allomorph of the common -rʊ/-ru. The reflexive-possessive suffixes retain their final (thus -ɑŋ<*-ban etc., while Khalkha has ). [13]

Large numbers are counted according to the Chinese counting system in powers of 10.000. Collective numerals can be combined with approximative numeral suffixes. So while ɑrwɑd 'about ten' and ɑrwʊl 'as a group of ten' a common in Mongolian, ɑrwɑdʊl 'as a group of about ten' seems to be peculiar to Chakhar. [14]

The pronominal system is much like that of Khalkha. [15] The colloquial form of the 1. person singular accusative (in which the idiosyncratic accusative stem is replaced) can be nadï instead of nadïɡ, and the alternation of i ~ ig does occur with other pronominal stems as well. This does not lead to confusion as the genitive is formed with mid-opened instead of closed front vowels, e.g. the 2. person singular genitive honorific is [tanɛ] in Chakhar and usually [tʰanɪ] in Khalkha. The 3. person stems don't employ any oblique stems. The 1. person plural exclusive man- has an almost complete case paradigm only excluding the nominative, while at least in written Khalkha anything but the genitive form <manai> is rare. [16]

Chakhar has approximately the same participles as Khalkha, but -mar expresses potentiality, not desire, and consequently -xar functions as its free allomorph. [17] On the other hand, there are some distinctive converbs such as -ba (from Chinese 吧 ba) 'if' and -ja (from 也 yè) 'although' which seem to be allomorphs of the suffixes -bal and -bt͡ʃ of common Mongolian origin. [18] The finite suffix -la might have acquired converbal status. [19] Finally, -xlar ('if ... then ...') has turned into -xnar, and the form -man ~ -mand͡ʒï̆n 'only if', which is absent in Khalkha, sometimes occurs. [20] Chakhar has the same core declarative finite forms as Khalkha, but in addition -xui and -lgui to indicate strong probability. [21]

Lexicon

Most loanwords peculiar to the Chakhar dialect are from Chinese and Manchu. [22]

Notes

  1. /ˈæhər,-kər/ ; Mongolian script: ᠴᠠᠬᠠᠷ, Cyrillic: Цахар, Latin: Cahar, [ˈt͡ɕʰɑχə̆r] ( [ˈt͡sʰaχə̆r] in Khalkha Mongolian); simplified Chinese :察哈尔; traditional Chinese :察哈爾; pinyin :Cháhā'ěr or Cháhār
  2. 1 2 while [k] (<*k) and [w] (<*p) that occur in loanwords and native words alike are only allophones of /x/ and /b/ in native words. [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mongolian language</span> Official language of Mongolia

Mongolian is the principal language of the Mongolic language family that originated in the Mongolian Plateau. It is spoken by ethnic Mongols and other closely related Mongolic peoples who are native to modern Mongolia and surrounding parts of East and North Asia. Mongolian is the official language of Mongolia and Inner Mongolia and a recognized language of Xinjiang and Qinghai.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mongolic languages</span> Language family of Eurasia

The Mongolic languages are a language family spoken by the Mongolic peoples in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, North Asia and East Asia, mostly in Mongolia and surrounding areas and in Kalmykia and Buryatia. The best-known member of this language family, Mongolian, is the primary language of most of the residents of Mongolia and the Mongol residents of Inner Mongolia, with an estimated 5.7+ million speakers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tuvan language</span> Sayan Turkic language

Tuvan, sometimes spelt Tyvan, is a Turkic language spoken in the Republic of Tuva in South Central Siberia, Russia. There are small groups of Tuvans that speak distinct dialects of Tuvan in China and Mongolia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evenki language</span> Tungusic language of eastern Russia and China

Evenki, formerly known as Tungus, is the largest member of the northern group of Tungusic languages, a group which also includes Even, Negidal, and the more closely related Oroqen language. The name is sometimes wrongly given as "Evenks". It is spoken by the Evenki or Ewenkī(s) in Russia and China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oirat language</span> Central Mongolic language

Oirat is a Mongolic language spoken by the descendants of Oirat Mongols, now forming parts of Mongols in China, Kalmyks in Russia and Mongolians. Largely mutually intelligible to other core Central Mongolic languages, scholars differ as to whether they regard Oirat as a distinct language or a major dialect of the Mongolian language. Oirat-speaking areas are scattered across the far west of Mongolia, the northwest of China and Russia's Caspian coast, where its major variety is Kalmyk. In China, it is spoken mainly in Xinjiang, but also among the Deed Mongol of Qinghai and Subei County in Gansu.

The Khalkha dialect is a dialect of central Mongolic widely spoken in Mongolia. According to some classifications, the Khalkha dialect includes Inner Mongolian varieties such as Shiliin gol, Ulaanchab and Sönid. As it was the basis for the Cyrillic orthography of Mongolian, it is de facto the national language of Mongolia. The name of the dialect is related to the name of the Khalkha Mongols and the Khalkha river.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mongolian script</span> Writing system used for the Mongolian language

The traditional Mongolian script, also known as the Hudum Mongol bichig, was the first writing system created specifically for the Mongolian language, and was the most widespread until the introduction of Cyrillic in 1946. It is traditionally written in vertical lines Top-Down, right across the page. Derived from the Old Uyghur alphabet, it is a true alphabet, with separate letters for consonants and vowels. It has been adapted for such languages as Oirat and Manchu. Alphabets based on this classical vertical script continue to be used in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia to write Mongolian, Xibe and, experimentally, Evenki.

The Dagur, Daghur, Dahur, or Daur language, is a Mongolic language, as well as a distinct branch of the Mongolic language family, and is primarily spoken by members of the Daur ethnic group.

Middle Mongol or Middle Mongolian was a Mongolic koiné language spoken in the Mongol Empire. Originating from Genghis Khan's home region of Northeastern Mongolia, it diversified into several Mongolic languages after the collapse of the empire. In comparison to Modern Mongolian, it is known to have had no long vowels, different vowel harmony and verbal systems and a slightly different case system.

Torgut, also spelled Torghud, is a dialect of the Oirat language spoken in Xinjiang, in western Mongolia and in eastern Kalmykia. Thus, it has more speakers than any other variety of Oirat. It is better researched than any other Oirat variety spoken in China.

Ordos Mongolian is a variety of Central Mongolic spoken in the Ordos City region in Inner Mongolia and historically by Ordos Mongols. It is alternatively classified as a language within the Mongolic language family or as a dialect of the standard Mongolian language. Due to the research of Antoine Mostaert, the development of this dialect can be traced back 100 years.

The Khorchindialect is a variety of Mongolian spoken in the east of Inner Mongolia, namely in Hinggan League, in the north, north-east and east of Hinggan and in all but the south of the Tongliao region. There were 2.08 million Khorchin Mongols in China in 2000, so the Khorchin dialect may well have more than one million speakers, making it the largest dialect of Inner Mongolia.

Alasha, or Alaša-Eǰen-e, is a Mongolic variety with features of both Oirat and Mongolian that historically used to belong to Oirat but has come under the influence of Mongolian proper. It has more than 40,000 speakers in Alxa League, Inner Mongolia, China and consists of two sub-dialects, Alasha proper and Eǰene.

In the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China, the Mongolian language is the official provincial language. Mongols are the second largest ethnic group, comprising about 17 percent of the population. There are at least 4.1 million ethnic Mongols in Inner Mongolia, including subgroups like the Chahars, Ordos, Baarin, Khorchin, Kharchin, and Buryats. While there is a standardized dialect of the Mongolian language in Inner Mongolia, different Mongolian dialects continue to be spoken by different subgroups of the Mongols. Some proposed the Peripheral Mongolian dialect group to cover the Mongolian dialects in Inner Mongolia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yakut language</span> Siberian Turkic language

Yakut, also known as Yakutian, Sakha, Saqa or Saxa, is a Turkic language belonging to Siberian Turkic branch and spoken by around 450,000 native speakers, primarily the ethnic Yakuts and one of the official languages of Sakha (Yakutia), a federal republic in the Russian Federation.

Baarin is a dialect of Mongolian spoken mainly in Inner Mongolia.

E is a letter of related and vertically oriented alphabets used to write Mongolic and Tungusic languages.

Na is a letter of related and vertically oriented alphabets used to write Mongolic and Tungusic languages.

La is a letter of related and vertically oriented alphabets used to write Mongolic and Tungusic languages.

References

  1. "Mongγul kele bičig-ün aǰil-un ǰöblel". See Sečenbaγatur, 2005: 204.
  2. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 6
  3. Janhunen (2003): 179-180
  4. Janhunen (2003): 179, Sečenbaγatur (2003): 7; judging from a map provided by Sečenbaγatur et al. (2005): 565, this extension relates to administrative areas in the following way: next to Xilin Gol and Ulanqab, Chakhar in its broadest extension would be spoken in Bayannur, Baotou, the northern part of the Hohhot area and the very western part of the Ulanhad.
  5. Sečenbaγatur et al. (2005): 85
  6. The analysis used in this article follows Svantesson et al. (2005): 22-25 in assuming that short vowels in non-initial syllables are non-phonemic.
  7. Sečenbaγatur et al. (2005): 209-213
  8. Sečenbaγatur et al. (2005): 224
  9. Köke and Sodubaγatur (1996): 10-14. They assume voicedness and not aspiration to be distinctive and give the following rations: males after voiceless consonants: 94% (n=384; “n” is the number of appropriate words uttered by speakers during a phonetic test), after voiced consonants: 53% (n=371), females after voiceless consonants: 87% (n=405), after voiced consonants: 38% (n=367). In contrast: only 7% of words in compound uttered by informants of both sexes contained such vowels. The authors try to link this with historical vowels, but as they don’t take into account that aspirated consonants were historically disallowed in word-final position, this line of argument is not very convincing.
  10. Norčin 2001: 148
  11. MKBAKKSKND (2003): 31-35
  12. MKBAKKSKND 2003: 30
  13. Sečenbaγatur 2003: 43-44, 49-50
  14. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 70, 75
  15. Sečenbaγatur et al. (2005): 390
  16. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 92-95, 100 for Chakhar; see Poppe (1951): 71-72 for Khalkha. He also gives ~tanä and a full paradigm (excluding nominative) for man-, but at least the full exclusive paradigm is exceedingly rare at least in writing and not reproduced in more recent (while somewhat prescriptive) grammars, e.g. Önörbajan (2004): 202-217. The exceedingly frequent form [natig] (instead of <namajg> doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere.
  17. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 126-127
  18. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 130-131
  19. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 134 asserts this, but doesn't provide conclusive evidence. However, compare Ashimura (2002) for Jarud where such a process has taken place
  20. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 132-133
  21. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 140-141; forms like <-lgüi dee> are quite frequent in Khalkha, but it is difficult to assess their exact grammatical status without some research.
  22. Sečenbaγatur (2003): 16-18

Bibliography