Proto-Hakka | |
---|---|
Common Neo-Hakka | |
Reconstruction of | Hakka Chinese |
Region | Southern Chinese highlands [1] |
Era | c. 1280-1530 [2] |
Reconstructed ancestors |
Proto-Hakka (also called Common Neo-Hakka, CNH) is the reconstructed proto-language from which all Hakka varieties descend. Like all branches of the Sinitic language family, proto-Hakka is difficult to reconstruct through the comparative method due to its multistratal lexicon.
It is believed that Sinitic migration into what is now Southern China started in the Qin dynasty, after which a slow yet steady population continued to migrate southwards, up until the early Tang dynasty. The part of the population who lived in the highlands then underwent frequent amicable cultural exchange with the She people (as opposed to the Ho-nte, also classified by the Chinese government under the She ethnonym), who are believed to have descended from an indigenous people. [3] The aforementioned Sinitic migrants likely spoke an early Sinitic language, and through this cultural exchange, the Sinitic language was transmitted to the ancestral She.
Later large migration waves due to the An-Shi Chaos and the fall of the Northern Song dynasty to the Jurchen-led Jin dynasty led to large increases of population, and conflicts between the migrants and pre-existing Highlanders of Sinitic ethnicity. [4] Once the conflict had calmed down, the two groups intermingled, and the language of these migrants provided superstrata on one of the pre-existing Highlander languages, which became the multi-stratal proto-Hakka. [5]
While Neo-Hakka and She share common innovations, there are She-internal innovations that are not shared with Neo-Hakka. This implies that Neo-Hakka is the sister branch to She Chinese, forming a bifurcating tree from their common ancestor. This proto-language is in turn closely related to the paraphyletic group of stem Hakka, or "Paleo-Hakka". [6] [note 1]
To reconstruct proto-Hakka, the language varieties to be included must first be decided. O'Connor's earlier reconstruction only utilizes data on Moiyan-like Hakka varieties, which Coblin calls "Mainstream Hakka". The dialects included in Coblin's reconstruction are known as "Neo-Hakka", which includes Mainstream Hakka, but also varieties in southern Jiangxi which are not mutually intelligible with Mainstream Hakka and whose speakers do not consider themselves Hakka people. [7]
The following critera are used to determine Neo-Hakka varieties: [8] [9]
Given the varieties to be included, the comparative method can then be applied to arrive at a reconstruction of this language. This reconstruction is described below.
The following consonants are reconstructed for Common Neo-Hakka:
Labial | Dental | Postalveolar | Velar | Glottal | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal | / m / | / n / | /ň/ | / ŋ / | ||
Plosive | tenuis | / p / | / t / | / k / | ||
aspirated | / pʰ / | / tʰ / | / kʰ / | |||
Affricate | tenuis | / ts / | /tš/ | |||
aspirated | / tsʰ / | /tšʰ/ | ||||
Fricative | / f / | / s / | /š/ | / h / | ||
Approximant | / v / | / l / |
Much like modern Hakka varieties, the consonants /m n ŋ p t k/ can appear in syllable-final position.
The consonant inventory is similar to modern Sinitic languages, and preserves the dental-postalveolar distinction found in other Sinitic languages like Modern Standard Mandarin or Hoisanese, as well as the postalveolar nasal, preserved in Shanghainese.
Common Neo-Hakka glides consist of /i/, /u/, or a combination thereof.
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
Close | i | ɨ | u |
Mid | e | ( ə ) ( ɚ ) | o |
Open | a |
Vowels in parentheses appear in loanwords from some Northern Chinese variety, likely some Northern Ming or Qing Mandarin koine or even early Modern Standard Mandarin. [10]
The following chart lists all of the finals in Common Neo-Hakka, which are a combination of glide, nucleus, and coda. Examples with the reconstructed final are written to the right, in parentheses if multiple variants with different finals can be reconstructed to the proto-language.
Nucleus | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/i/ | /ɨ/ | /u/ | /e/ | /ə/ /ɚ/ | /o/ | /a/ | /ŋ̩/ | ||
Coda | ∅ | *-i 移 *-ui 未 [lower-alpha 1] *-iui (銳) | *-ɨ 思 | *-u 烏 *-iu 於 | *-e (事) *-ie [lower-alpha 2] (鋸) | *-ə [lower-alpha 3] (而) *ɚ [lower-alpha 4] 爾 | *-o 多 *-io 茄 *-uo 火 | *-a 啞 *-ia 夜 *-ua 花 | *ŋ̩ (女) |
/i/ | *-ei [lower-alpha 5] (買) | *-oi (海) *-ioi [lower-alpha 6] (歲) *-uoi [lower-alpha 7] 灰 | *-ai 帶 *-iai 低 *-uai 淮 | ||||||
/u/ | *-eu 歐 *-ieu 又 | *-ou 老 | *-au 包 *-iau 腰 | ||||||
/m/ | *-im 音 | *-em 森 | *-om 敢 | *-am 帆 *-iam 鹽 | |||||
/n/ | *-in 因 | *-un 溫 *-iun 暈 | *-en 恩 | *-on 安 *-ion 遠 *-uon 酸 | *-an 反 *-ian 煙 *-uan 關 | ||||
/ŋ/ | *-iŋ 英 | *-uŋ (翁) *-iuiŋ 永 [lower-alpha 1] | *-eŋ 生 *-ueŋ 衡 | *-oŋ 幫 *-ioŋ 羊 *-uoŋ 光 | *-aŋ 硬 *-iaŋ [lower-alpha 7] 餅 *-uaŋ 橫 *-uiaŋ 兄 | ||||
/p/ | *-ip 揖 | *-ep 澀 | *-op 鴿 | *-ap 鴨 *-iap 葉 | |||||
/t/ | *-it 一 | *-ut 骨 *-iut 出 | *-et [lower-alpha 7] 蝨 | *-ot 割 *-iot 決 *-uot 刮 *-uiot 血 | *-at 八 *-iat 熱 *-uat (括) | ||||
/k/ | *-ik 役 [lower-alpha 1] | *-uk 屋 *-iuk 浴 | *-ek 得 *-uek 或 | *-ok 惡 *-iok 藥 *-uok 廓 [lower-alpha 1] | *-ak 白 *-iak 石 |
The finals reconstrcted violate phonotactic rules expected from the Mainstream Hakka dialects, such as forbidding velar codas after front vowels. This is due to the existence of Hakka languages, like Ningdu Hakka , that allow both velars and dental consonants to act as codas after front vowels, [11] thus the distinction must be reconstructed to their last common ancestor.
Common Neo-Hakka has 7 tones. Historical voiced stops become aspirated in the areal tone split. The traditional tone categories and their names are listed below:
Tone category | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level 平 | Rising 上 | Going 去 | Entering 入 | ||
Tone register | Dark 陰 | 1. 陰平 Dark Level | 3. 陰上 Dark Rising | 5. 陰去 Dark Going | 7. 陰入 Dark Entering |
Light 陽 | 2. 陽平 Light Level | 6. 陽去 Light Going | 8. 陽入 Light Entering |
Due to the diverse realization of tonal values in the descendants, precise tone values were not reconstructed. For example, the Dark Level tone is realized as [˦] (44) in Moiyan (Meixian), [12] whereas in Ngiaupin (Raoping) it is [˩] (11) and in Ningdu it is [˦˨] (42) or [˦˧] (43). [11] Tones 7 and 8, the Entering tones, are distinguished by their stop codas, and so do not count as independent tones phonemically. However, they are included separately as they are considered independent categories in Chinese historical linguistics.
Certain vocabulary items can also be reconstructed for proto-Hakka, a selection of which is provided below. Only reconstructions for forms surviving in more than two dialects are included by Coblin.
English gloss | Reconstruction | Written form |
---|---|---|
is / are (copula) | *hei6 [lower-alpha 1] | 係 |
eat | *šik8 | 食 |
I (1SG) | *ŋai1 / *ŋai2 / *ŋai3 | |
you (singular) | *ŋ̩2~*ŋ̩3 / ni1 / *ňi2 | |
that | *kai5 /*kai2 [lower-alpha 2] / *kai3 [lower-alpha 2] | |
existential negative ("not have / not exist") | *mau2 / *muo2 [lower-alpha 3] | |
son | *lai6 | 孻 |
daughter | *ŋ̩3 / *ňiu3 / *nie | 女 |
*muoi5*tse3 / *muoi5*tsɨ3 | 妹子 | |
face | *mian5 | 面 |
eye | *ŋan3 | 眼 |
*ŋan3*tšiu1 | 眼珠 | |
*muk7*tšiu1 | 目珠 | |
mouth | *tšoi5 | [lower-alpha 4] |
house | *vuk7 | 屋 |
mountain | *san1 | 山 |
*liaŋ1 | 嶺 | |
cooked rice | *fan6 / *pʰon6 | 飯 |
egg | *tšʰiun1 | 春 |
*luon3 | 卵 | |
*tʰan3 | 蛋 | |
meat | *ňiuk7 | 肉 |
wear (clothing) | *tšok7 | 著 |
stand | *kʰi1 | 企/徛 |
speak / talk | *koŋ3 | 講 |
*va6 | 話 | |
know | *ti1 (*tek7) | 知(得) |
*hiau3*tek7 | 曉得 |
Chinese is a group of languages spoken natively by the ethnic Han Chinese majority and many minority ethnic groups in China. Approximately 1.35 billion people, or 17% of the global population, speak a variety of Chinese as their first language.
Hakka forms a language group of varieties of Chinese, spoken natively by the Hakka people in parts of Southern China, Taiwan, some diaspora areas of Southeast Asia and in overseas Chinese communities around the world.
Yue is a branch of the Sinitic languages primarily spoken in Southern China, particularly in the provinces of Guangdong and Guangxi.
Middle Chinese or the Qieyun system (QYS) is the historical variety of Chinese recorded in the Qieyun, a rime dictionary first published in 601 and followed by several revised and expanded editions. The Swedish linguist Bernhard Karlgren believed that the dictionary recorded a speech standard of the capital Chang'an of the Sui and Tang dynasties. However, based on the preface of the Qieyun, most scholars now believe that it records a compromise between northern and southern reading and poetic traditions from the late Northern and Southern dynasties period. This composite system contains important information for the reconstruction of the preceding system of Old Chinese phonology.
There are hundreds of local Chinese language varieties forming a branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family, many of which are not mutually intelligible. Variation is particularly strong in the more mountainous southeast part of mainland China. The varieties are typically classified into several groups: Mandarin, Wu, Min, Xiang, Gan, Jin, Hakka and Yue, though some varieties remain unclassified. These groups are neither clades nor individual languages defined by mutual intelligibility, but reflect common phonological developments from Middle Chinese.
Historical Chinese phonology deals with reconstructing the sounds of Chinese from the past. As Chinese is written with logographic characters, not alphabetic or syllabary, the methods employed in Historical Chinese phonology differ considerably from those employed in, for example, Indo-European linguistics; reconstruction is more difficult because, unlike Indo-European languages, no phonetic spellings were used.
General Chinese is a diaphonemic orthography invented by Yuen Ren Chao to represent the pronunciations of all major varieties of Chinese simultaneously. It is "the most complete genuine Chinese diasystem yet published". It can also be used for the Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese pronunciations of Chinese characters, and challenges the claim that Chinese characters are required for interdialectal communication in written Chinese.
The Sinitic languages, often synonymous with the Chinese languages, are a group of East Asian analytic languages that constitute a major branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family. It is frequently proposed that there is a primary split between the Sinitic languages and the rest of the family. This view is rejected by some researchers but has found phylogenetic support among others. The Macro-Bai languages, whose classification is difficult, may be an offshoot of Old Chinese and thus Sinitic; otherwise, Sinitic is defined only by the many varieties of Chinese unified by a shared historical background, and usage of the term "Sinitic" may reflect the linguistic view that Chinese constitutes a family of distinct languages, rather than variants of a single language.
A checked tone, commonly known by the Chinese calque entering tone, is one of the four syllable types in the phonology of Middle Chinese. Although usually translated as "tone", a checked tone is not a tone in the phonetic sense but rather a type of syllable that ends in a stop consonant or a glottal stop. Separating the checked tone allows -p, -t, and -k to be treated as allophones of -m, -n, and -ng, respectively, since they are in complementary distribution. Stops appear only in the checked tone, and nasals appear only in the other tones. Because of the origin of tone in Chinese, the number of tones found in such syllables is smaller than the number of tones in other syllables. Chinese phonetics have traditionally counted them separately.
The four tones of Chinese poetry and dialectology are four traditional tone classes of Chinese words. They play an important role in Chinese poetry and in comparative studies of tonal development in the modern varieties of Chinese, both in traditional Chinese and in Western linguistics. They correspond to the phonology of Middle Chinese, and are named even or level, rising, departing or going, and entering or checked. They are reconstructed as mid, mid rising, high falling, and mid with a final stop consonant respectively. Due to historic splits and mergers, none of the modern varieties of Chinese have the exact four tones of Middle Chinese, but they are noted in rhyming dictionaries.
Proto-Tai is the reconstructed proto-language of all the Tai languages, including modern Lao, Shan, Tai Lü, Tai Dam, Ahom, Northern Thai, Standard Thai, Bouyei, and Zhuang. The Proto-Tai language is not directly attested by any surviving texts, but has been reconstructed using the comparative method.
Proto-Tibeto-Burman is the reconstructed ancestor of the Tibeto-Burman languages, that is, the Sino-Tibetan languages, except for Chinese. An initial reconstruction was produced by Paul K. Benedict and since refined by James Matisoff. Several other researchers argue that the Tibeto-Burman languages sans Chinese do not constitute a monophyletic group within Sino-Tibetan, and therefore that Proto-Tibeto-Burman was the same language as Proto-Sino-Tibetan.
Proto-Hlai is the reconstructed ancestor of the Hlai languages. Proto-Hlai reconstructions include those of Matisoff (1988), Thurgood (1991), Wu (2000), Ostapirat (2004), and Norquest (2007).
Scholars have attempted to reconstruct the phonology of Old Chinese from documentary evidence. Although the writing system does not describe sounds directly, shared phonetic components of the most ancient Chinese characters are believed to link words that were pronounced similarly at that time. The oldest surviving Chinese verse, in the Classic of Poetry (Shijing), shows which words rhymed in that period. Scholars have compared these bodies of contemporary evidence with the much later Middle Chinese reading pronunciations listed in the Qieyun rime dictionary published in 601 AD, though this falls short of a phonemic analysis. Supplementary evidence has been drawn from cognates in other Sino-Tibetan languages and in Min Chinese, which split off before the Middle Chinese period, Chinese transcriptions of foreign names, and early borrowings from and by neighbouring languages such as Hmong–Mien, Tai and Tocharian languages.
Although Old Chinese is known from written records beginning around 1200 BC, the logographic script provides much more indirect and partial information about the pronunciation of the language than alphabetic systems used elsewhere. Several authors have produced reconstructions of Old Chinese phonology, beginning with the Swedish sinologist Bernhard Karlgren in the 1940s and continuing to the present day. The method introduced by Karlgren is unique, comparing categories implied by ancient rhyming practice and the structure of Chinese characters with descriptions in medieval rhyme dictionaries, though more recent approaches have also incorporated other kinds of evidence.
Proto-Sino-Tibetan (PST) is the hypothetical linguistic reconstruction of the Sino-Tibetan proto-language and the common ancestor of all languages in it, including the Sinitic languages, the Tibetic languages, Yi, Bai, Burmese, Karen, Tangut, and Naga. Paul K. Benedict (1972) placed a particular emphasis on Old Chinese, Classical Tibetan, Jingpho, Written Burmese, Garo, and Mizo in his discussion of Proto-Sino-Tibetan.
Proto-Min (pMǐn) is a comparative reconstruction of the common ancestor of the Min group of varieties of Chinese. Min varieties developed in the relative isolation of the Chinese province of Fujian and eastern Guangdong, and have since spread to Taiwan, Southeast Asia, and other parts of the world. They contain reflexes of distinctions not found in Middle Chinese or most other modern varieties, and thus provide additional data for the reconstruction of Old Chinese.
Eastern Han Chinese is the stage of the Chinese language attested in poetry and glosses from the Eastern Han period. It is considered an intermediate stage between Old Chinese and the Middle Chinese of the 7th-century Qieyun rime dictionary.
She or Shehua is an unclassified Sinitic language spoken by the She people of Southeastern China. It is also called Shanha, San-hak (山哈) or Shanhahua (山哈话). She speakers are located mainly in Fujian and Zhejiang provinces of Southeastern China, with smaller numbers of speakers in a few locations of Jiangxi, Guangdong and Anhui provinces.
Proto-Karenic or Proto-Karen is the reconstructed ancestor of the Karenic languages.