USS Indiana (BB-1)

Last updated

USS Indiana LOC npcc 32733.jpg
USS Indiana between 1900 and 1908
History
US flag 48 stars.svgUnited States
NameIndiana
Namesake State of Indiana
Ordered30 June 1890
Builder William Cramp & Sons, Philadelphia
Laid down7 May 1891
Launched28 February 1893
Commissioned20 November 1895
Decommissioned24 December 1903
Recommissioned9 January 1906
Decommissioned23 May 1914
Recommissioned24 May 1917
Decommissioned31 January 1919
RenamedCoast Battleship Number 1 on 29 March 1919
Fate
  • Sunk as target on 1 November 1920
  • Sold for scrapping 19 March 1924
General characteristics [1] [2] [3] [4]
Class and type Indiana-class pre-dreadnought battleship
Displacement10,288 long tons (10,453  t) (standard)
Length
Beam69 ft 3 in (21.11 m) (wl)
Draft27 ft (8.2 m)
Installed power4 × Scotch boilers
Propulsion
Speed15 knots (28  km/h; 17  mph)
Range4,900  nmi (9,100  km; 5,600  mi) [note 1]
Complement
  • 32 officers
  • 441 men
Armament
Armor
  • Belt: 18–8.5 in (457–216 mm)
  • 13" turrets: 15 in (381 mm)
  • Hull: 5 in (127 mm)
  • 8" turrets: 6 in (152 mm)
  • Conning Tower: 10 in (254 mm)
  • Deck: 3 in (76 mm)
General characteristics (Later refits)
Installed power
Armament

USS Indiana was the lead ship of her class and the first battleship in the United States Navy comparable to foreign battleships of the time. [5] Authorized in 1890 and commissioned five years later, she was a small battleship, though with heavy armor and ordnance. The ship also pioneered the use of an intermediate battery. She was designed for coastal defense [6] and as a result, her decks were not safe from high waves on the open ocean.

Contents

Indiana served in the Spanish–American War (1898) as part of the North Atlantic Squadron. She took part in both the blockade of Santiago de Cuba and the Battle of Santiago de Cuba, which occurred when the Spanish fleet attempted to break through the blockade. Although unable to join the chase of the escaping Spanish cruisers, she was partly responsible for the destruction of the Spanish destroyers Plutón and Furor. After the war, she quickly became obsolete—despite several modernizations—and spent most of her time in commission as a training ship or in the reserve fleet, with her last commission during World War I as a training ship for gun crews. She was decommissioned for the third and final time in January 1919 and was shortly after reclassified Coast Battleship Number 1 so that the name Indiana could be reused. She was sunk in shallow water as a target in aerial bombing tests in 1920, and her hull was sold for scrap in 1924.

Design

Indiana was constructed from a modified version of a design drawn up by a US Navy policy board in 1889 for a short-range battleship. The original design was part of an ambitious naval construction plan to build 33 battleships and 167 smaller ships. The United States Congress saw the plan as an attempt to end the U.S. policy of isolationism and did not approve it, but a year later, the United States House of Representatives approved funding for three coast defense battleships, which would become Indiana and her sister ships Massachusetts and Oregon. [7] The "coast defense" designation was reflected in Indiana's moderate endurance, relatively small displacement and low freeboard, which limited seagoing capability. [8] The ships proved to be disappointments in service, as they were badly overweight upon completion, their low freeboard hampered operations at sea, and they handled poorly. [9] Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships describes her design as "attempting too much on a very limited displacement." [10] They were nevertheless the first modern battleships for the American fleet. [9] [10]

Plan and profile illustration of Oregon, one of the Indiana-class battleships USS Oregon 1893 USNHC NH 76619 010332.jpg
Plan and profile illustration of Oregon, one of the Indiana-class battleships

Indiana was 351 feet 2 inches (107.04 m) long overall and had a beam of 69 ft 3 in (21.11 m) and a draft of 24 ft (7.3 m). She displaced 10,288 long tons (10,453  t ) as designed and up to 11,688 long tons (11,876 t) at full load. The ship was powered by two-shaft triple-expansion steam engines rated at 9,000 indicated horsepower (6,700  kW ) and four coal-fired fire-tube boilers, generating a top speed of 15 knots (28 km/h; 17 mph). She had a cruising radius of 5,640 nautical miles (10,450 km; 6,490 mi) at a speed of 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph). As built, she was fitted with a heavy military mast, which was later supplemented by a stern cage mast in 1910–1911. She had a crew of 32 officers and 441 enlisted men, which increased to a total of 586636 officers and enlisted. [10] [11]

The ship was armed with a main battery of four 13 in (330 mm) /35 caliber guns in two twin gun turrets on the centerline, one forward and aft. The secondary battery consisted of eight 8-inch (203 mm) /35 cal. guns, which were placed in four twin wing turrets. These were supported by a battery of six 6 in (150 mm) /40 cal. guns in a casemate battery amidships. For close-range defense against torpedo boats, she carried twenty 6-pounder guns and six 1-pounder guns in individual mounts. As was standard for capital ships of the period, Indiana carried 18 in (457 mm) torpedo tubes in above-water mounts, though the number is unclear. According to Conway's, she was fitted with six tubes, though the naval historian Norman Friedman states she was ordered with seven but completed with five. [10] [12]

Indiana's main armored belt was 18 in (457 mm) thick over the magazines and the machinery spaces and was reduced to 4 in (102 mm) at the bow and stern. The main battery gun turrets had 17-inch (432 mm) thick sides, and the supporting barbettes had the same thickness of armor plate on their exposed sides. The 8 in turrets had 6 in of armor plating, and the casemate battery had 5 in (127 mm). The conning tower had 10 in (254 mm) thick sides. [2]

Service history

Construction and early career

Indiana early in her career US Battleship Indiana.jpg
Indiana early in her career

Construction of the ships was authorized on 30 June 1890, and the contract for Indiana—not including guns and armor—was awarded to William Cramp & Sons in Philadelphia, who offered to build it for $3,020,000. [13] The ship's total cost was almost twice as high, approximately $6,000,000. [14] The contract specified the ship had to be built in three years, but slow delivery of armor plates caused a two-year delay. [15] [16] Indiana's keel was laid down on 7 May 1891 [17] and she was launched on 28 February 1893, attended by around 10,000 people, including President Benjamin Harrison, several members of his cabinet and the two senators from Indiana. [18] [19] During her fitting-out in early March 1894, the ship undertook a preliminary sea trial to test her speed and machinery. [20] At this point, her side armor, guns, turrets, and conning tower had not yet been fitted, [21] and her official trials would not take place until October 1895 due to the delays in armor deliveries. [22] [23]

Indiana was commissioned on 20 November 1895 under the command of Captain Robley D. Evans. [24] After further trials, the ship joined the North Atlantic Squadron under the command of Rear Admiral Francis M. Bunce, which conducted training exercises along the East Coast of the United States. [25] In late 1896, both main turrets broke loose from their clamps in heavy seas. Because the turrets were not centrally balanced, they swung from side to side with the ship's motion, until they were secured with heavy ropes. Heavier clamps were installed, but in February 1896, while conducting fleet maneuvers with the North Atlantic squadron, the Indiana encountered more bad weather and started rolling heavily. Her new captain, Henry Clay Taylor, promptly ordered her back to port for fear the clamps would break again. [26] This convinced the navy that bilge keels—omitted during construction because, with them, the ship could not fit in most American dry docks—were necessary to reduce the rolling, [27] and they were installed on all three ships of the Indiana-class. [28]

Spanish–American War

Painting of the Indiana during the battle of Santiago LOC 3b37478u 1898-Apr 14 The Indiana in battle.jpg
Painting of the Indiana during the battle of Santiago

At the outbreak of the Spanish–American War in April 1898, Indiana was at Key West with the rest of the North Atlantic Squadron, at the time commanded by Rear Admiral William T. Sampson. [17] [29] His squadron was ordered to the Spanish port of San Juan in an attempt to intercept and destroy Admiral Cervera's Spanish squadron, which was en route to the Caribbean from Spain. The harbor was empty, but Indiana and the rest of the squadron bombarded it for two hours on 12 May 1898 before realizing their mistake. [17] The squadron returned to Key West, where news arrived three weeks later that Commodore Schley's Flying Squadron had found Cervera and was now blockading him in the port of Santiago de Cuba. Sampson reinforced Schley on 1 June [17] and assumed overall command. [30]

In an attempt to break the stalemate, it was decided to attack Santiago from land. A transport convoy was assembled in Key West, and Indiana was sent back to lead it. [31] The expeditionary force, under the command of Major General William Rufus Shafter, landed east of the city and attacked it on 1 July. [32] Cervera saw that his situation was desperate and attempted to break through the blockade on 3 July 1898, resulting in the battle of Santiago de Cuba. [17] The cruisers New Orleans and Newark and battleship Massachusetts had left the day before to load coal in Guantanamo Bay. [33] Admiral Sampson's flagship, the cruiser New York, had also sailed east earlier that morning for a meeting with General Shafter, [34] leaving Commodore Schley in command. [33] This left the blockade weakened and unbalanced on the day of the battle, as three modern battleships (Indiana, Oregon and Iowa) and the armed yacht Gloucester guarded the east, while the west was only defended by the second-class battleship Texas, cruiser Brooklyn and armed yacht Vixen. [35]

Occupying the extreme eastern position of the blockade, [17] Indiana fired at the cruisers Infanta María Teresa and Almirante Oquendo as they left the harbor, [36] [37] but, due to engine problems, was unable to keep up with the Spanish cruisers as they fled to the west. [38] When the Spanish destroyers Plutón and Furor emerged, Indiana was near the harbor entrance and, together with Iowa, she supported the armed yacht Gloucester in the destruction of the lightly armored enemy ships. [39] She was then ordered to keep up the blockade of the harbor in case more Spanish ships came out and so played no role in the chase and sinking of the two remaining Spanish cruisers, Vizcaya and Cristóbal Colón. [40]

Post Spanish–American War

Aerial view of the damaged Indiana following aerial bombing tests Damaged USS Indiana (BB-1) following aerial bombing tests (37970282031).jpg
Aerial view of the damaged Indiana following aerial bombing tests

After the war, Indiana returned to training exercises with the North Atlantic Squadron. In May 1900, she and Massachusetts were placed in reserve as the navy had an acute officer shortage and needed to put the new Kearsarge-class and Illinois-class battleship into commission. [41] The battleships were reactivated the following month as an experiment in how quickly this could be achieved, [42] but Indiana was placed in the reserve fleet again that winter. [43] In March 1901, it was decided to use her that summer for a midshipman practice cruise, [44] and this would be her regular summer job for the next few years, [17] while the rest of the time she would serve as a training ship. [45] During her time as a training vessel, her crew beat the 1903 world record with eight-inch guns, four bullseyes with four shots. [46] She was decommissioned on 29 December 1903 [17] to be overhauled and modernized. [47] The obsolete battleship received several upgrades: new Babcock & Wilcox boilers, counterweights to balance her main turrets, and electric traversing mechanisms for her turrets. [48] She was recommissioned on 9 January 1906 and manned by the former crew of her sister ship Massachusetts, including Captain Edward D. Taussig, commanding. Massachusetts had been decommissioned the day before to receive similar modernization. [49]

During her second commission, Indiana spent most of her time laid up in the reserve fleet, [50] occasionally participating in practice cruises. [17] [51] In January 1907, she helped provide relief in the aftermath of the 1907 Kingston earthquake. [52] In 1908, the 6-inch (152 mm)/40 caliber guns and most of the lighter guns were removed to compensate for the counterweights added to the main battery turrets and because the ammunition supply for the guns was considered problematic. A year later, twelve 3-inch (76 mm)/50 caliber single-purpose guns were added midships and in the fighting tops. At the same time, a cage mast was added. [48] In early 1910, she was fitted with an experimental Lacoste speed brake, which would be deployed from the side of the hull to act as an emergency brake; the trials were inconclusive. [53] By 1913 it was speculated that the ship might soon be used for target practice, [54] but instead, the ship was decommissioned on 23 May 1914. [17] After the United States entered World War I, Indiana was commissioned for the third time and served as a training ship for gun crews near Tompkinsville, Staten Island, and in the York River, and placed under the command of George Landenberger. [55]

On 31 January 1919, she was decommissioned for the final time, and two months later, she was renamed Coast Battleship Number 1 so that the name Indiana could be assigned to the newly authorized—but never completed—battleship Indiana (BB-50). [17] The old battleship was brought to shallow waters in the Chesapeake Bay near the wreck of the target ship San Marcos (ex-Battleship Texas). [17] Here she was subjected to aerial bombing tests conducted by the navy. She was hit with dummy bombs from aircraft, and explosive charges were set off at the positions where the bombs hit. The tests were a response to claims from Billy Mitchell—at the time assistant to Chief of Air Service Charles T. Menoher—who stated to Congress that the Air Service could sink any battleship. The conclusions drawn by the navy from the experiments conducted on Indiana were very different, as Captain William D. Leahy stated in his report: "The entire experiment pointed to the improbability of a modern battleship being either destroyed or completely put out of action by aerial bombs." The subject remained a matter of dispute between Mitchell and the Navy, and several more bombing tests were conducted with other decommissioned battleships, culminating in the sinking of SMS Ostfriesland. [56] Despite the navy's conclusions, Indiana sank during the test and settled in the shallow water, where she remained until her wreck was sold for scrap on 19 March 1924. [17] When the US Navy adopted hull numbers in 1920, Indiana was retroactively assigned the number "BB-1". [57]

Notes

  1. Experimental data for Indiana and Massachusetts were lumped together, and the rounded average was calculated. See Bryan 1901.
  2. Sources conflict on this. Reilly & Scheina 1980 claim six on p. 56, then four on p. 68. Friedman 1985 claims the contract called for seven tubes, but Indiana was completed with four.

Related Research Articles

USS <i>Oregon</i> (BB-3) Indiana-class pre-dreadnought battleship of the United States Navy

USS Oregon (BB-3) was the third and final member of the Indiana class of pre-dreadnought battleships built for the United States Navy in the 1890s. The three ships were built as part of a modernization program aimed at strengthening the American fleet to prepare for a possible conflict with a European navy. Designed for short-range operations in defense of the United States, the three Indiana-class ships had a low freeboard and carried a main battery of four 13-inch (330 mm) guns in a pair of gun turrets. Oregon and her sister ships were the first modern battleships built for the United States, though they suffered from significant stability and seakeeping problems owing to their small size and insufficient freeboard.

USS <i>Texas</i> (1892) Second-class battleship of the United States Navy

USS Texas was a pre-dreadnought battleship built by the United States in the early 1890s. The first American battleship commissioned, she was built in reaction to the acquisition of modern armored warships by several South American countries, and meant to incorporate the latest developments in naval tactics and design. This includes the mounting of her main armament en echelon to allow maximum end-on fire and a heavily-armored citadel amidships to ensure defensive strength. However, due to the state of U.S. industry at the time, Texas's building time was lengthy, and by the time she was commissioned, she was already out of date. Nevertheless, she and the armored cruiser USS Maine were considered advancements in American naval design.

USS <i>Iowa</i> (BB-4) Pre-dreadnought battleship of the United States Navy

USS Iowa was a pre-dreadnought battleship built for the United States Navy in the mid-1890s. The ship was a marked improvement over the previous Indiana-class battleships, correcting many of the defects in the design of those vessels. Among the most important improvements were significantly better seaworthiness owing to her greater freeboard and a more efficient arrangement of the armament. Iowa was designed to operate on the high seas, which had been the impetus to increase the freeboard. She was armed with a battery of four 12-inch (305 mm) guns in two twin-gun turrets, supported by a secondary battery of eight 8-inch (203 mm) guns.

USS <i>Maine</i> (1889) Battleship of the United States Navy

Maine was a United States Navy ship that sank in Havana Harbor on February 15, 1898, contributing to the outbreak of the Spanish–American War in April. U.S. newspapers, engaging in yellow journalism to boost circulation, claimed that the Spanish were responsible for the ship's destruction. The phrase, "Remember the Maine! To hell with Spain!" became a rallying cry for action. Although the Maine explosion was not a direct cause, it served as a catalyst that accelerated the events leading up to the war.

USS <i>Massachusetts</i> (BB-2) Indiana-class battleship of the United States Navy

USS Massachusetts was an Indiana-class, pre-dreadnought battleship and the second United States Navy ship comparable to foreign battleships of its time. Authorized in 1890, and commissioned six years later, she was a small battleship, though with heavy armor and ordnance. The ship class also pioneered the use of an intermediate battery. She was designed for coastal defense and as a result, her decks were not safe from high waves on the open ocean.

USS <i>Alabama</i> (BB-8) Pre-dreadnought battleship of the United States Navy

USS Alabama (BB-8) was an Illinois-class pre-dreadnought battleship built for the United States Navy. She was the second ship of her class, and the second to carry her name. Her keel was laid down in December 1896 at the William Cramp & Sons shipyard, and she was launched in May 1898. She was commissioned into the fleet in October 1900. The ship was armed with a main battery of four 13-inch (330 mm) guns and she had a top speed of 16 knots.

USS <i>Maine</i> (BB-10) Pre-dreadnought battleship of the United States Navy

USS Maine (BB-10), the lead ship of her class of pre-dreadnought battleships, was the second ship of the United States Navy to be named in honor of the 23rd state. Maine was laid down in February 1899 at the William Cramp & Sons shipyard in Philadelphia. She was launched in July 1901 and commissioned into the fleet in December 1902. She was armed with a main battery of four 12-inch (305 mm) guns and could steam at a top speed of 18 knots.

USS <i>Kearsarge</i> (BB-5) Kearsarge-class pre-dreadnought battleship

USS Kearsarge (BB-5), was a pre-dreadnought battleship of the United States Navy and lead ship of her class of battleships. She was named after the sloop-of-war Kearsarge, famous for sinking the CSS Alabama, and was the only United States Navy battleship not named after a state.

USS <i>Kentucky</i> (BB-6) Kearsarge-class pre-dreadnought battleship of the United States Navy

USS Kentucky (BB-6), was the second and final Kearsarge-class pre-dreadnought battleship built for the United States Navy in the 1890s. Designed for coastal defense, the Kearsarge-class battleships had a low freeboard and heavy armor. The ships carried an armament of four 13-inch (330 mm) and four 8-inch (203 mm) guns in an unusual two-story turret arrangement. The Newport News Shipbuilding Company of Virginia laid down her keel on 30 June 1896. She was launched on 24 March 1898 and was commissioned on 15 May 1900.

USS <i>Brooklyn</i> (ACR-3) United States Navy armored cruiser

USS Brooklyn (ACR-3/CA-3) was the third United States Navy armored cruiser, the only one to be named at commissioning for a city rather than a state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armored cruiser</span> Type of cruiser in the late 19th and early 20th centuries

The armored cruiser was a type of warship of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It was designed like other types of cruisers to operate as a long-range, independent warship, capable of defeating any ship apart from a battleship and fast enough to outrun any battleship it encountered.

<i>Indiana</i>-class battleship Pre-dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Indiana class was a class of three pre-dreadnought battleships launched in 1893. These were the first battleships built by the United States Navy comparable to contemporary European ships, such as the British HMS Hood. Authorized in 1890 and commissioned between November 1895 and April 1896, these were relatively small battleships with heavy armor and ordnance that pioneered the use of an intermediate battery. Specifically intended for coastal defense, their freeboard was insufficient to deal well with the waves of the open ocean. The turrets lacked counterweights, and the main belt armor was placed too low to be effective under most conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Santiago de Cuba</span> Naval battle near Santiago de Cuba during the Spanish–American War

The Battle of Santiago de Cuba was a decisive naval engagement that occurred on July 3, 1898 between an American fleet, led by William T. Sampson and Winfield Scott Schley, against a Spanish fleet led by Pascual Cervera y Topete, which occurred during the Spanish–American War. The significantly more powerful US Navy squadron, consisting of four battleships and two armored cruisers, decisively defeated an outgunned squadron of the Royal Spanish Navy, consisting of four armored cruisers and two destroyers. All of the Spanish ships were sunk for no American loss. The crushing defeat sealed the American victory in the Cuban theater of the war, ensuring the independence of Cuba from Spanish rule.

<i>Kearsarge</i>-class battleship Pre-dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Kearsarge-class was a group of two pre-dreadnought battleships built for the United States Navy in the 1890s. The two ships—USS Kearsarge and USS Kentucky—represented a compromise between two preceding battleship designs, the low-freeboard Indiana class and the high-freeboard USS Iowa, though their design also incorporated several improvements. Their primary advances over earlier designs consisted of new quick-firing guns and improved armor protection, but their most novel feature was their two-story gun turrets that consisted of a secondary 8-inch (203 mm) gun turret fixed to the top of their primary 13-inch (330 mm) turrets. The ships suffered from a number of problems, however, including a tertiary battery mounted too low in the hull and poorly-designed turrets, though the latter were attempted again with the Virginia class in the early 1900s, also with negative results.

<i>Illinois</i>-class battleship Pre-dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Illinois class was a group of three pre-dreadnought battleships of the United States Navy commissioned at the beginning of the 20th century. The three ships, Illinois, Alabama, and Wisconsin, were built between 1896 and 1901. They were transitional ships; they incorporated advances over preceding designs, including the first modern gun turrets for the main battery, and new rapid-firing secondary guns, but they were also the last American battleships to feature dated technologies like fire-tube boilers and Harvey armor. They were armed with a main battery of four 13-inch (330 mm) guns in two twin turrets, supported by a secondary battery of fourteen 6 in (150 mm) guns. The ships had a designed speed of 16 knots, though they exceeded that speed by a significant margin.

Russian battleship <i>Oryol</i> Russian Borodino-class battleship

Oryol was a Borodino-class battleship built for the Imperial Russian Navy in the first decade of the 20th century. The ship was completed after the start of the Russo-Japanese War in February 1904 and was assigned to the Second Pacific Squadron sent to the Far East six months later to break the Japanese blockade of Port Arthur. The Japanese captured the port while the squadron was in transit and their destination was changed to Vladivostok. Oryol was badly damaged during the Battle of Tsushima in May 1905 and surrendered to the Japanese, who put her into service under the name of Iwami.

SMS <i>Kaiserin und Königin Maria Theresia</i> Armored cruiser of the Austro-Hungarian Navy

SMS Kaiserin und Königin Maria Theresia was an armored cruiser used by the imperial Austro-Hungarian Navy from 1895 to 1917; she was the first ship of that type built by the Austro-Hungarian Navy. The ship was a unique design, built by the Stabilimento Tecnico Triestino shipyard in Trieste; she was laid down in July 1891, launched in April 1893, and completed in November 1894. Armed with a main battery of two 24-centimeter (9.4 in) guns and eight 15 cm (5.9 in) guns, the ship provided the basis for two subsequent armored cruiser designs for the Austro-Hungarian Navy.

Spanish cruiser <i>Almirante Oquendo</i> Spanish Navy cruiser

Almirante Oquendo, was an Infanta Maria Teresa-class armored cruiser of the Spanish Navy that fought at the Battle of Santiago de Cuba during the Spanish–American War.

<i>Ibuki</i>-class armored cruiser Japanese class of armored cruisers

The Ibuki class, also called the Kurama class, was a ship class of two large armoured cruisers built for the Imperial Japanese Navy after the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905. These ships reflected Japanese experiences during that war as they were designed to fight side-by-side with battleships and were given an armament equal to, or superior to existing Japanese battleships. The development of the battlecruiser the year before Ibuki was completed made her and her sister ship Kurama obsolete before they were completed because the foreign battlecruisers were much more heavily armed and faster.

References

  1. Reilly & Scheina 1980, p. 68.
  2. 1 2 Friedman 1985, p. 425.
  3. Reilly & Scheina 1980, p. 58.
  4. Bryan 1901.
  5. Reilly & Scheina 1980, p. 67.
  6. Scientific American 1896, p. 297.
  7. Friedman 1985, pp. 24–25.
  8. Gardiner & Lambert 1992, p. 121.
  9. 1 2 Friedman 1985, pp. 17, 20–29.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Campbell 1979, p. 140.
  11. Friedman 1985, pp. 83, 425.
  12. Friedman 1985, p. 27.
  13. The New York Times& 1 December 1890.
  14. Reilly & Scheina 1980, p. 69.
  15. The New York Times& 19 January 1901.
  16. The New York Times& 14 May 1907.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DANFS Indiana (BB-1).
  18. The New York Times& 27 February 1893.
  19. The New York Times& 28 February 1893.
  20. The New York Times& 7 March 1894.
  21. The New York Times& 9 March 1894.
  22. The New York Times& 19 October 1895.
  23. The New York Times& 20 September 1894.
  24. The New York Times& 19 November 1895.
  25. The New York Times& 18 June 1896.
  26. Reilly & Scheina 1980, p. 59.
  27. The New York Times& 5 February 1897.
  28. Reilly & Scheina 1980, p. 60.
  29. The New York Times& 1 April 1898.
  30. Graham & Schley 1902, p. 203.
  31. The New York Times& 12 June 1898.
  32. Hale 1911, p. 286.
  33. 1 2 Graham & Schley 1902, pp. 299–300.
  34. Hale 1911, p. 288.
  35. Graham & Schley 1902, pp. 303–304.
  36. Graham & Schley 1902, p. 316.
  37. The New York Times& 26 August 1898.
  38. Graham & Schley 1902, p. 317.
  39. Graham & Schley 1902, p. 333.
  40. The New York Times& 26 July 1898.
  41. The New York Times& 14 April 1900.
  42. The New York Times& 6 June 1900.
  43. The New York Times& 20 August 1900.
  44. The New York Times& 26 March 1901.
  45. The New York Times& 8 April 1902.
  46. "The Brandon news. (Brandon, Miss.) 1892-1961, December 24, 1903, Image 2".
  47. The New York Times& 19 November 1903.
  48. 1 2 Reilly & Scheina 1980, p. 62.
  49. The New York Times& 8 January 1906.
  50. The New York Times& 10 November 1907.
  51. The New York Times& 27 November 1909.
  52. DANFS Williamson.
  53. Smith 1916.
  54. The New York Times& 31 March 1913.
  55. The New York Times& 16 January 1936.
  56. Correll 2008.
  57. Tucker, p. 1143.

Sources cited

Books

Newspapers

Other

Further reading