| White Owl Conservation Awards | |
|---|---|
| Awarded for | greatest contribution to the preservation of the Canadian environment |
| Sponsored by | General Cigar Co. (1968–71) Imperial Tobacco (1972–76) |
| Country | Canada |
| Presented by | government minister or senator |
| Rewards | varied by year and recipient |
| First award | 1968 |
| Final award | 1976 |
The White Owl Conservation Awards were established in 1968. Initially, a single award was given annually to the person or group (chosen from those nominated) that was considered to have made the greatest contribution to the preservation of Canada's natural environment. The award could be shared by two persons or groups. Later, separate prizes were given annually for individuals and groups. A system of grants for worthy environmental projects was introduced in 1970.
The awards and grants were discontinued at the end of 1976 due to controversy over their sponsor. The original sponsor of the program was the General Cigar Company of Montréal, Quebec (see Note [A] for use of accented "é "), maker of the White Owl brand of cigars. By 1972, sponsorship was assumed by Imperial Tobacco, of which General Cigar was a subsidiary.
"An aroused public is the only thing that will force governments at all levels to take adequate steps to combat air and water pollution, prevent desecration of forests and stem the demise of wildlife, says Robert Alexander.Canadian business has come under attack from time to time as ' profit-seeking commercial interests ' mainly responsible for the ' rape of the environment '. Mr. Alexander feels, though, that the problem is broader than that. ' Society in general has to share some of the blame, because in its haste to acquire easier living without adequate planning, it is often forgotten that a large price is being paid for it, bigger even than the price tags on new automobiles '....
Mr. Alexander says that, in the coming century, technology will make for more and more leisure time, but ' we will have nowhere to go in pursuit of happiness '. Industrial effluent has poisoned the rivers, the air will be toxic with exhaust fumes, the countryside will have vanished and cities will be paralyzed by congestion. ' But it was in recognition of those who are striving to do something about the problem that our [White Owl Conservation] award was initiated.'"
... " Bob Alexander is as much a keen conservationist as he is a businessman, and tries to incorporate the two interests. True, he has often been asked how a man concerned about wildlife and clean air can manufacture ' these smelly cigars ' and no, he doesn't have an answer. ' What would you say? ' he asked with a shrug. ' I guess all I can say is that the decision to smoke is a personal one but having to breathe polluted air is not.'"
The annual White Owl Conservation Awards were established in 1968 by Robert B. Alexander, [B] an ardent conservationist and the marketing Vice-President (April 1969, President) of the General Cigar Company Ltd. [C] The company used part of its advertising budget to sponsor the awards. [2] [11] [12]
In November 1967, General Cigar had introduced new packaging and collectible insert cards for the four varieties of its White Owl brand of cigars. The cards were illustrated by J. Fenwick Lansdowne, an internationally noted painter of Canadian birds, with descriptive texts added by naturalist John Livingstone. During their conversations on environmental matters, Alexander, Lansdowne, and Livingstone had noted "the fact that Canada had no way of recognizing its outstanding conservationists", [11] which led to the creation of the White Owl awards in 1968. [11] [13] [14] [15]
Robert Alexander left General Cigar as of May 1, 1971, to take up the position of manager of a tobacco wholesaler in Victoria, British Columbia. He was replaced as President of General Cigar by one of its vice-presidents, Edmond Ricard, who became President of Imperial Tobacco Products Ltd. as of March 1, 1972. Ricard held the Imperial Tobacco position in addition to the presidencies of its subsidiaries, General Cigar Co. and Imperial Leaf Tobacco Co. [16] [17] [18] [19] [8] [20] [21]
By 1972, sponsorship of the White Owl Conservation Awards was transferred from General Cigar Company [D] to its parent company, Imperial Tobacco Products Limited, which was renamed Imperial Tobacco Limited in November 1974. This incarnation of Imperial Tobacco was an operating division of Imasco Limited. [8] [9] [28] [29] [30] [31]
The first White Owl Conservation Award (1968) was a single honour comprising a trophy and a $5000 prize. It was presented to the individual or organization considered by an independent panel of judges (the Awards Committee) to have "contributed the most" to conservation in Canada. Nominations for the first award opened in March 1968, and it was presented the following December. In the first year, candidates for consideration could be proposed only by members of Outdoor Writers of Canada, [E] who nominated fourteen organizations and one individual. Starting in 1969, nominations could be made by any Canadian. [35] [36] [38] [39] [40] [37]
The winner in 1970 was the nominee considered by the Awards Committee to have contributed the most to anti-pollution work and the preservation of the Canadian environment. [41] The amount of the prize was doubled in 1971 to $10000. In addition, the specific reference in the criteria to anti-pollution work was dropped, and the phrase "outstanding contribution" came into use near the end of that year alongside the phrase "contributed the most". [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47]
Separate awards for groups and individuals were introduced in 1972, with respective prizes of $10000 and $2000. In 1975, the prize for the individual award was increased to $3000. [48] [49]
In each of 1971 and 1972, the Awards Committee held a competition among post-secondary educational institutions for the production of a television commercial that promoted public participation in the preservation of the environment. All entries became the property of the Committee. The prizes were $1000 for first place, $300 for second place, and $100 each for two honourable mentions. [44] [50] [51] [52]
A § Summary by year of the specifics of the awards and grants and a separate list by year of the § Recipients of awards are given below.
In late April 1970, the White Owl Conservation Awards Committee announced the availability of grants of up to $2500 for conservation and anti-pollution projects, with "immediate need" being a key criterion. [53] Initially, four grants were made each year in 1970, 1971, and 1972. [54] [55] [56] In 1971, the range for the grants was set as $1000 to $2500, with a total allotment of $8000, the latter being an increase from 1970. [42] [43] [57]
Beginning in 1973, the number of annual grants increased. Starting January 1974, the intention was to issue grants "on a near-monthly basis", with amounts under $1000 available. [58] [59] Starting February 1975, the Awards Committee could officially give multiple grants to a single group, and a special category of "mini-grants" of up to $500 was introduced for "groups getting started, or for useful, small-scale projects". [60] The sum of $35000 was allotted for grants in each of 1975 and 1976. [49] [61]
A list by year of the § Recipients of grants is given below.
In March 1976, the name of the White Owl Conservation Awards (and Program) was changed to the Imperial Tobacco Environmental Awards (and Program). Imperial Tobacco gave a number of reasons for the change:
| White Owl Conservation Awards and Grants, 1968-1976 | |||||
| Year | Annual Prize(s) | Grants available for Projects | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person or Group | TV Commercial | ||||
| 1968 | $5000 | — | — | [38] [40] | |
| 1969 | $5000 | — | — | [37] | |
| 1970 | $5000 | — | - Up to $2500 each. | [41] [53] | |
| 1971 | $10000 | $1000/$300/$100 | - From $1000 to $2500 each. | [42] [50] | |
| Group | Person | ||||
| 1972 | $10000 | $2000 | $1000/$300/$100 | - From $1000 to $2500 each. | [48] [52] |
| 1973 | $10000 | $2000 | — | - From $1000 to $2500 each. | [64] |
| 1974 | $10000 | $2000 | — | - Up to $2500 each. | [58] |
| 1975 | $10000 | $3000 | — | - Up to $2500 each. | [49] |
| 1976 | $10 000 | $3000 | — | - Up to $2500 each. | [61] |
| Recipients of the White Owl Conservation Award(s), 1968–1975 | |||
| Year | Recipient(s) and Achievement(s) | Trophy & Prize | Presenter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1968 | Albion Hills Conservation School, in the Township of Albion (1974, Town of Caledon): – For "its educational programs for a wide variety of youth and student groups [F] in many aspects of conservation and the outdoor environment. [G] ... Its seven day a week programs are so successful that they are booked one year in advance." [40] The judges hoped that the selection of the Albion Hills School would "encourage the establishment of more such facilities" for the betterment of children and adults everywhere in Canada. [65] | $5000 | Jean Chrétien [H] |
| 1969 | John R. Heron, [I] author, Royal Bank of Canada Monthly Letter : [J] – For using the publication since 1946 to promote conservation to its 700000 readers worldwide (in 1969) and for publishing two booklets on the conservation of flora and fauna. B.C. Wildlife Federation: | $5000 shared | Alan Macnaughton [K] |
| 1970 | Pollution Probe (founded 1969 at the University of Toronto): – For raising public awareness of the problem of phosphates in detergents and for being a key player in getting Ontario to ban the insecticide DDT. [77] [78] | $5000 | Jean Chrétien |
| 1971 | Tony Le Sauteur, chemist, conservationist, and Director of Fédération québécoise de la faune (Quebec Wildlife Federation): – For numerous contributions, including the development of a widely used method of stocking lakes with fish, the establishment of 50 local lake associations to prevent pollution, and his work to restore the shoreline and islands of the St. Lawrence River as public parklands. Le Sauteur was a very active and vocal opponent of water pollution, notably industrial pollution in the Ottawa River and untreated sewage from the City of Montréal. He was considered to be the pre-eminent water pollution expert in Montréal. | $10000 | Victor Goldbloom [L] |
Competition among post-secondary educational institutions for the production of a television commercial that promoted public participation in environmental preservation:
| |||
| 1972 | Canadian Wildlife Federation : – For its education program, its submissions to the government on proposed environmental legislation, its contribution to the creation of the Canadian Arctic Resources Commission, and its intervention in legal actions in U.S. courts to block the construction of an oil pipeline in Alaska and the consequent transportation by ocean tankers. | Group $10000 | Jean Chrétien |
| Dr. Fred Knelman of Sir George Williams University : – For raising public awareness of key environmental issues and representing Canada at international environmental meetings. | Person $2000 | ||
Competition among post-secondary educational institutions for the production of a television commercial that promoted public participation in environmental preservation:
| |||
| 1973 | Students' Park Fund: – For raising money to purchase parkland in the Hamilton, Ontario, area of the Niagara Escarpment for the creation of a nature park by the local conservation authority in lieu of commercial development. National and Provincial Parks Association:– For its successful opposition to the residential and commercial development of the Lake Louise area in the Alberta Rockies. | Group $10000 shared | Maurice Lamontagne [M] |
| Dr. Donald Chant, Chair of the Department of Zoology at the University of Toronto, outspoken environmentalist, a founder of Pollution Probe (1969), the Canadian Arctic Resources Committee, and the Canadian Environmental Law Research Foundation: | Person $2000 | ||
| 1974 | Canadian Environmental Law Research Foundation: – For its efforts to enforce environmental laws through the courts and for its book Environment on Trial: A Citizen's Guide to Ontario Environmental Law. | Group $10000 | Jeanne Sauvé [N] |
| Jack O'Dette: – For "an estimated 22,000 hours of conservation work" as a founder of the Canadian Wildlife Federation and a longtime officer of the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters. [89] [90] | Person $2000 | ||
| 1975 | Canadian Arctic Resources Committee, comprising scientists, sociologists, lawyers, engineers, business people, and indigenous people: – For its work to ensure that development projects in the Arctic are fully studied before being implemented. | Group $10000 | George Albert Kerr [O] |
| Anthony Barrett, a founder of Pollution Probe (1969) and an environmental consultant: | Person $3000 | ||
| Recipients of the Imperial Tobacco Environment Awards, 1976 | |||
| Year | Recipient(s) and Achievement(s) | Trophy & Prize | |
| 1976 | Energy Probe : | Group $10000 | |
| Gary Gallon, Director, Canadian Scientific Pollution and Environmental Control Society, Vancouver: – For his strong advocacy for the prevention and elimination of petroleum pollution in marine environments. [97] Douglas Pimlott, Professor of Forestry and Zoology, University of Toronto, and member, Canadian Arctic Resources Committee:– For his active and vocal opposition to the drilling for oil and gas in Canada's Arctic waters. [98] | Person $3000 shared | ||
| Grants by the White Owl Conservation Award(s) Committee for projects, 1970–1976 | |||
| Year | Recipient and Purpose(s) | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970 | Pollution Probe - Toronto: – To finance its Summer Project '70 in which a group of university students studied water pollution in Ontario's resort areas and held discussion groups with seasonal residents regarding means of reducing such pollution. [99] | $2000 | |
| Society for Pollution and Environmental Control (SPEC) of Vancouver, British Columbia: – For its anti-pollution projects, including an "Ecology Caravan" travelling around BC to publicize the need for immediate action on pollution, equipment for a laboratory to test air and water, and sound metering equipment. [100] | $2500 | ||
| Society to Overcome Pollution (STOP) of Montréal, Quebec: – To defray its office expenses. [101] | $1000 | ||
| Conseil québécois de l'environnement (Quebec Council on the Environment) [P] : – To publish an information bulletin. [101] | $1000 | ||
| The White Owl Committee sponsored and hosted an Anti-Pollution Conference [Q] in the Laurentians at Lac-Écho, north of Saint-Jérôme , Quebec, July 31 and August 1–2, for anti-pollution organizations from across Canada. The conference resulted in the adoption of The Canadian Association on Human Environment (incorporated federally April 1970) [R] as a national co-ordinating office for the groups. [106] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] | |||
| 1971 | Algonquin Wildlands League: | $1300 | |
| Douglas Pimlott, Professor of Forestry and Zoology, University of Toronto, ardent promoter of conservation and active member of several conservation organizations: | $2500 | ||
| Ojibwe youth of the Rat Portage Reserve near Kenora, Ontario : | $1500 | ||
| Canadian Arctic Resources Committee, formed June 1971: | $2500 | ||
| 1972 | National and Provincial Parks Association of Canada, Ottawa Branch: – To finance the printing of its booklet Gatineau Park : A Proposal for its Conservation and Use in which the group argued for the preservation of the park in its current semi-wilderness state. [30] [123] | $2000 | |
| R. Murray Schafer, Professor of Communication Studies at Simon Fraser University : – To publish a new edition of his book The Book of Noise, which described the dangers of noise pollution. [30] [124] | $2125 | ||
| Canadian Environmental Law Research Foundation: | $2500 | ||
| Bruce Litteljohn, director of the Algonquin Wildlands League, former Quetico Provincial Park ranger, and opponent of logging and mining in provincial parks: | $2500 | ||
| The following should not be treated as complete since the entries are derived primarily from reports in print media. Two of the items (one in 1973, one in 1974) were found only in archival records. | |||
| 1973 | Comité pour la défense de la Baie James (James Bay Defence Committee) of Montréal: – To enable it to hold public hearings on the ecological, social, and economic aspects of a vast hydroelectric project in the James Bay region. [130] [131] | $2500 | |
| B.C. Wildlife Federation: – For the publication of a booklet promoting the establishment of provincially protected " wild rivers ", which were "to be preserved in their natural, free-flowing state." [132] [133] | $1850 | ||
| Ecology Action Centre of Halifax, Nova Scotia : – For its representations to governments and public information campaigns regarding recycling, public transit, large-scale energy projects (off-shore oil drilling, oil refinery on the Strait of Canso, proposed nuclear reactor), and the provincial Environmental Protection Act. [134] | $2500 | ||
| Calgary Boy Scouts : | $2262 | ||
| Centre for Environmental Law (Le Centre d'assistance juridique pour l'environnement) of the Society to Overcome Pollution (STOP) of Montréal: | $2500 | ||
| 1974 | Le Centre de l'éducation sur l'environnement (Centre for Environmental Education) established by members of the Society to Overcome Pollution (STOP) of Montréal: | $2500 | |
| Alberta Wilderness Association of Calgary, Alberta: – To supply high schools in the province with copies of its studies on the preservation and recreational use of wildlands in the Alberta Rockies. [143] | $2500 | ||
| Centre écologique de Port-au-Saumon (Port-au-Saumon Ecological Centre) near the village of Saint-Fidèle-de-Mont-Murray, Quebec: | $700 | ||
| Nova Scotia Teachers College of Truro : – To assist its development of a wilderness training centre comprising 600 acres of woods, fields, streams, and ponds on the bank of the Salmon River. [147] | ? | ||
| Natural Recovery Systems of Moncton, New Brunswick: – To promote its recycling system among the residents of the city. The company operated a facility where recyclable glass containers and paper products were sorted and packed following their retrieval from a number of collection depots. In 1974, it had a proposal before the city council for curbside collection. [145] [148] [149] | $2500 | ||
| Panels 9 and 10 of the Canadian Committee for the International Biological Programme, at Edmonton, Alberta: – To promote the Committee's proposal to create protected ecological reserves in Canada's Arctic (August, $1500), and for the reprinting of its information booklet Arctic Ecological Reserves (September, $1500). [150] [151] [152] | $3000 | ||
| James Kevin O'Neil, graduate student at Macdonald College, Montréal: – In support of his research into the "activity of small mammals in a woodland community." [151] | $200 | ||
| Citizens United to Restore our Environment (CURE) of Brockville, Ontario : – To support their symposium for area municipalities and residents to discuss the problems of solid waste disposal and the implementation of recycling. [153] | $2000 | ||
| Raptor Research Centre at Macdonald College, Montréal: – In support of its program to revive birds of prey in areas from which they have been driven out by humans. [154] [155] | $2500 | ||
| 1975 | Project Jonah Canada (formed December 1972 by Farley Mowat): | $2500 | |
| Dr. Michel Famelart and students of Université de Montréal : – For a feasibility study to extend protected parkland status to all of the isolated mountains of the Monteregian Hills from the City of Montréal towards the City of Sherbrooke. This status would allow for the future establishment of a series of recreational trails on and between the mountains. (January 1975 for 1974 program.) [60] [156] [159] | $2500 | ||
| Katherine (Kay) and Larry McKeever in the Vineland community of Lincoln, Ontario: | $2500 | ||
| Yukon Conservation Society: | $500 | ||
| Pollution Probe - Ottawa: – To support their protest against recent Ontario legislation that did not impose a ban on all non-returnable soft-drink containers. An information caravan toured twelve centres in the central and eastern parts of the province, and public information campaigns were conducted elsewhere with the assistance of local groups. [163] [164] [165] [166] | $2500 | ||
| Kindness Club of Fredericton, New Brunswick: – To publish in French the club's Golden Rules of Conservation. The focus of the group was the education of children in the humane treatment of animals. [167] [168] | $500 | ||
| British Columbia Environmental Law Centre: – For its efforts to educate the public on their environmental rights, to advise people of the legal remedies available, and to reform environmental law. [169] | $2500 | ||
| Comité pour la défense de la Baie James (James Bay Defence Committee) of Montréal: – To enable it to research the socio-ecological effects of a proposed uranium enrichment plant in the James Bay region and to publish the results for the information of the general public. [170] [171] | $2500 | ||
| John Devlin of Halifax, Nova Scotia : – To permit him to research and confirm the historical rights of the City's inhabitants to access the ocean via certain designated plots of land. [172] | $2300 | ||
| Gordon Edwards, editor (since 1970) of the ecology magazine Survival (house organ of the Survival movement) and co-founder (1975) of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility : | ? | ||
| Saskatoon Environmental Society : | $2000 | ||
| Natural Recovery Systems of Moncton, New Brunswick: – To assist its information campaign regarding its new curbside collection program for recycling glass containers in the adjacent Town of Riverview so as to increase household participation. The company had distributed a dedicated plastic pail (called a "Glass Gobbler") to each home in the community. They hoped to extend the program to Moncton itself. [179] [180] [181] | $2500 | ||
| Chinook Trail Association of Calgary, Alberta: – "To build stiles and footbridges for a new hiking trail ... from the Bearspaw Reservoir to Cochrane." [179] | $400 | ||
| Canadian Nature Federation of Ottawa, Ontario: – To defray the costs of publishing a directory of local, provincial, national, and international environmental organizations. [179] | $2500 | ||
| 1976 | Pollution Probe - Toronto: – In support of a campaign to encourage businesses to use environmentally friendly packaging ($2500). – for a campaign to increase public interest in renewable sources of energy ($2500). [182] [183] [184] | $5000 | |
| Tetra Media Productions (independent filmmakers and members of the Toronto Filmmakers' Co-op, which provided the post-production facilities and a contact address): | $2500 | ||
| Alberta Wilderness Association (Calgary) and National and Provincial Parks Association (Edmonton Chapter): – To publish a study entitled The Western Swan Hills : Alberta’s Forgotten Wilderness for free distribution to Alberta and federal legislators, high-school libraries, and certain high-ranking provincial officials. [189] [190] | $1250 | ||
| Les Forestiers (The Foresters), a group of young naturalists at Rivière-à-Pierre in Portneuf County: – To improve the nature trails around a local lake by constructing walkways and to encourage public use via a visitor's guide and an outdoor theatre. [191] | $400 | ||
| Grants by the Imperial Tobacco Environment Program for projects, 1976 | |||
| Year | Recipient and Purpose(s) | Amount | |
| 1976 | Groupe d'étude de l'autoroute 73 (Highway 73 Study Group): – To publish an illustrated pamphlet regarding the environmental damage being done during the construction of the highway through the municipality of Notre-Dame-des-Laurentides , immediately north of Québec City. [192] | $500 | |
| Pollution Probe - Ottawa: – To help fund the Community Museum of Energy Conservation at the National Museum of Science and Technology. The project featured means of reducing energy consumption as well as the use of heat pumps and renewable sources, such as solar, wind, greenhouses, and heat pumps. [193] [194] [195] | $2500 | ||
| Canadian Environmental Law Association of Toronto: – To develop a draft by-law for municipalities for the protection of trees, to produce a promotional information pamphlet on the matter, and to support other actions for the preservation of urban green-spaces. [196] | $2500 | ||
| Group to Arrest Dryden-Minamata Disease, comprising residents of the native communities on the lower English and Wabigoon rivers in Northwestern Ontario : | $2500 | ||
| Comité des Citoyens du Quartier Saint-Sauveur (Saint-Sauveur Neighbourhood Citizens' Committee) of Québec City: – To permit them to continue their efforts to reduce local noise and air pollution by closing a transit bus garage in the disadvantaged community of the Lower Town of the City. [198] | $2500 | ||
| Victoria Community Video Services Society: – To produce a video highlighting the problems associated with the waterways traversing the City of Victoria, British Columbia, to educate the public and enable their intervention to avoid such problems in future planning. [199] | $2500 | ||
" Imasco Ltd. [parent company of Imperial Tobacco] of Montreal found itself in the uncomfortable position in 1974 of favoring the James Bay power project while supplying funds to its opponents. ...Its James Bay dilemma came about through its financial support of the White Owl Conservation Awards program. The awards are administered by an independent committee, which on two occasions gave money money to opponents of the James Bay development, including the James Bay Inuit Association. The brief goes on to quote Imasco vice-president of public relations, Norman Dann:
' I got two phone calls from guys who are friends of mine, saying what the hell are giving money to them for? Well, I said, I grant you it's a bit embarrassing, but the fact is that we support the James Bay project and we also support people in their right to protest against it.'
Mr. Dann said that if Imasco itself had been making the decision, ' maybe we wouldn't have ... the thing is we gave the committee autonomy and they used it.'"
The White Owl Conservation Awards Committee, which decided upon the award winners and grant recipients, consisted of prominent Canadians, many of whom were associated with the environmental movement. In 1968, the committee comprised only three members, all of whom were members of the Outdoor Writers of Canada (OWC). In subsequent years, the committee membership increased in number and encompassed a greater range of individuals. The committee was independent of the sponsors of the program, and its membership varied from year to year. [64] [200] [201] [202]
The members of the Awards Committee for selected years are given below:
1975 [202]
" Having found out it was as welcome as a skunk at a garden party, ants at a picnic or, say, a White Owl cigar smoker at a meeting of SPEC, Imperial Tobacco Ltd. is saying farewell to the environmental movement. ...Imperial began its environmental awards program in 1968 with annual ' White Owl Conservation Awards ' of $5,000 each. ... This year the name was changed to Imperial Tobacco Environmental Program.
' It is not really a contradiction in terms. The amount of pollution generated by tobacco products is ridiculously small,' [Michel ] Descoteaux [of Imperial Tobacco] said. 'And Imperial has always been very pollution conscious, insisting that all of its industrial operations are careful of the environment.' ...
A letter explaining its withdrawal from the program says:
' Imperial Tobacco has determined that its involvement in an environmental program sometimes lends to interpretations of its motives which tend to make it a somewhat unpleasant if not altogether counterproductive association.'
The dropping of the name White Owl from the program didn't seem to help.
' The recent change of name has precipitated some reactions which indicate that our continued sponsorship is fraught with the constant possibility of misunderstanding and embarrassment for all concerned.'
Gallon [1976 individual award co-winner] said he is sorry to see the awards program cancelled. ...' Smoking is as bad a pollutant or contaminant around,' said Gallon, ' but we'll take money from any company around.'
Gallon said he doesn't smoke and smoking is not allowed at SPEC meetings. SPEC [a 1970 grant recipient] actively supports the anti-smoking programs of the Canadian Cancer Society and other organizations.'"
"La compagnie Imperial Tobacco s'est sans doute rendu compte du ridicule dans lequel elle se trouvait en subventionnant ces dernières années des programmes contre la pollution. Le tabac étant lui-même un agent de pollution parmi les plus dangereux. Elle a donc mis un terme à ses subventions."[Translation]Imperial Tobacco has no doubt realized how ridiculous it has been in subsidizing anti-pollution programs in recent years. Tobacco is itself one of the most dangerous agents of pollution. It has therefore put an end to its subsidies.
By 1976, Imperial Tobacco was being challenged over its sponsorship of the White Owl awards and grants. These objections led to the termination of the honours and monies at the end of that year. The company's support for an environmental program was regarded as incompatible with the pollution created by tobacco smoking. [225] [226] [227]