2012 Massachusetts Question 2

Last updated
Question 2
Massachusetts "Death with Dignity" Initiative
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes1,466,86648.87%
Light brown x.svg No1,534,75751.13%
Valid votes3,001,623100.00%
Invalid or blank votes00.00%
Total votes3,001,623100.00%

MA Question 2 2012 Counties.svg
MA Question 2 2012 Municipalities.svg
MA Question 2 2012.svg

The Massachusetts "Death with Dignity" Initiative, also known as Question 2, appeared on the November 6, 2012 general election ballot in the state of Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute to allow physician-assisted suicide. The measure was filed with the Massachusetts Attorney General and would establish, according to those who filed the measure, an "Act Relative to Death with Dignity". The petition number for the initiative was 11-12, and was filed by Michael Clarke as "An Initiative Petition for an Act Relative to Death with Dignity". [1]

Contents

The proposal was to allow terminally ill patients to be given lethal drugs. A terminally ill patient would be defined as a patient being given six months or fewer to live. The patient requesting the medication must be mentally capable to make medical decisions while consulting their respective doctors. Patients would be required to submit their request orally twice and witnessed in writing, and the initial verbal request must be fifteen days prior to the written request and second oral request. The patient's terminal diagnosis and capability to make health care decisions must be confirmed by a second doctor. [2]

The proposed measure, according to the text, requires substantial compliance with these and other requirements. The text states: "A person who substantially complies in good faith with provisions of this chapter shall be deemed to be in compliance with this chapter." [2]

The proposed act also allows blood relatives to participate in assisting the patient to sign up for the lethal dose, providing that one of the required witnesses on the lethal dose request form not be a patient’s relative by blood, marriage or adoption. [2] Supporters argue that the measure would give terminally ill patients dignity and control over their deaths, and would alleviate suffering. Opponents argue that the measure is morally wrong, and that beneficiaries of terminally ill patients could abuse the provisions presented by the proposal.

Voters blocked the measure by a thin margin in the November 6, 2012 general election, with 49% of voters for and 51% against. [3]

Text of the measure

Ballot language

The ballot language of the measure reads as follows: [4]

A YES VOTE would enact the proposed law allowing a physician licensed in Massachusetts to prescribe medication, at the request of a terminally-ill patient meeting certain conditions, to end that person’s life.A NO VOTE would make no change in existing laws.

Support

Supporters

Arguments

The following is information obtained from the supporting side of the initiative.

Opposition

Opponents

Arguments

The following is information obtained from the opposing side of the initiative:

Returned donation

The Committee Against Physician Assisted Suicide returned a $250,000 donation from a conservative Mississippi-based organization with anti-gay views in order to "keep the focus on the ballot question". The American Family Association was the largest single donor to the Committee Against Physician Assisted Suicide with the remainder coming mainly from religious organizations. [23]

Polls

Lawsuit

John Kelly et al vs. Martha Coakley

On May 17, 2012, over 60 Massachusetts voters including members of the disability rights group Second Thoughts filed a challenge before the Supreme Judicial Court against the measure, challenging the wording to the measure. On June 4, 2012, the claim was denied by Justice Cordy. [27]

According to John Kelly, director of the Second Thoughts group, and who is listed in the title of the lawsuit, "The ballot language is clearly misleading. We want the voters of Massachusetts to know exactly what they are voting on this November." The petition asks the Supreme Judicial Court to remand the language to Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley and Secretary of State William Galvin with the requirement that they amend the language for clarity and accuracy. [28]

The case docket can be read here. [29]

Related Research Articles

Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending life to eliminate pain and suffering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assisted suicide</span> Suicide undertaken with aid from another person

Assisted suicide describes the process by which a person, with the help of others, takes medications to die by suicide.

The right to die is a concept based on the opinion that human beings are entitled to end their lives or undergo voluntary euthanasia. Possession of this right is often bestowed with the understanding that a person with a terminal illness, incurable pain, or without the will to continue living should be allowed to end their own life, use assisted suicide, or decline life-prolonging treatment. The question of who, if anyone, may be empowered to make this decision is often the subject of debate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1994 Oregon Ballot Measure 16</span> Referendum on medical aid in dying

Measure 16 of 1994 established the U.S. state of Oregon's Death with Dignity Act, which legalizes medical aid in dying with certain restrictions. Passage of this initiative made Oregon the first U.S. state and one of the first jurisdictions in the world to permit some terminally ill patients to determine the time of their own death.

Terminal illness or end-stage disease is a disease that cannot be cured or adequately treated and is expected to result in the death of the patient. This term is more commonly used for progressive diseases such as cancer, dementia, advanced heart disease, and for HIV/AIDS, or long COVID in bad cases, rather than for injury. In popular use, it indicates a disease that will progress until death with near absolute certainty, regardless of treatment. A patient who has such an illness may be referred to as a terminal patient, terminally ill or simply as being terminal. There is no standardized life expectancy for a patient to be considered terminal, although it is generally months or less. Life expectancy for terminal patients is a rough estimate given by the physician based on previous data and does not always reflect true longevity. An illness which is lifelong but not fatal is a chronic condition.

Voluntary euthanasia is the purposeful ending of another person's life at their request, in order to relieve them of suffering. Voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) have been the focus of intense debate in the 21st century, surrounding the idea of a right to die. Some forms of voluntary euthanasia are legal in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and Spain.

Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which ruled that the United States Attorney General cannot enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against physicians who prescribed drugs, in compliance with Oregon state law, to terminally ill patients seeking to end their lives, commonly referred to as assisted suicide. It was the first major case heard by the Roberts Court under the new Chief Justice of the United States.

Involuntary euthanasia is illegal in all 50 states of the United States. Assisted suicide is legal in 10 jurisdictions in the US: Washington, D.C. and the states of California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, New Mexico, Maine, New Jersey, Hawaii, and Washington. The status of assisted suicide is disputed in Montana, though currently authorized per the Montana Supreme Court's ruling in Baxter v. Montana that "nothing in Montana Supreme Court precedent or Montana statutes [indicates] that physician aid in dying is against public policy."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dignity in Dying</span> UK pro-euthanasia organisation

Dignity in Dying is a United Kingdom nationwide campaigning organisation. It is funded by voluntary contributions from members of the public, and as of December 2010, it claimed to have 25,000 actively subscribing supporters. The organisation declares it is independent of any political, religious or other affiliations, and has the stated primary aim of campaigning for individuals to have greater choice and more control over end-of-life decisions, so as to alleviate any suffering they may be undergoing as they near the end of their life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legality of euthanasia</span>

The legality of euthanasia varies between countries and territories. Efforts to change government policies on euthanasia of humans in the 20th and 21st centuries have met with limited success in Western countries. Human euthanasia policies have also been developed by a variety of NGOs, most advocacy organisations although medical associations express a range of perspectives, and supporters of palliative care broadly oppose euthanasia.

Barbara Coombs Lee is an American activist, author, former family nurse practitioner and physician assistant, and president emerita/senior adviser of Compassion & Choices, a national non-profit organization dedicated to expanding and protecting the rights of the terminally ill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Michigan Proposal 1</span> Referendum legalizing medical marijuana

The Michigan Compassionate Care Initiative was an indirect initiated state statute that allowed the medical use of marijuana for seriously ill patients. It was approved by voters as Proposal 1 on November 6, 2008, 63 percent in favor to 37 percent opposed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Washington Death with Dignity Act</span> Referendum legalizing some assisted suicide

Initiative 1000 (I-1000) of 2008 established the U.S. state of Washington's Death with Dignity Act, which legalizes medical aid in dying with certain restrictions. Passage of this initiative made Washington the second U.S. state to permit some terminally ill patients to determine the time of their own death. The effort was headed by former Governor Booth Gardner.

Suicide tourism, or euthanasia tourism, is the practice of potential suicide candidates travelling to a jurisdiction to die by suicide or assisted suicide which is legal in some jurisdictions, or the practice of travelling to a jurisdiction in order to obtain drugs that can aid in the process of ending one's own life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assisted suicide in the United States</span> Medically-induced suicide with help from another person

In the United States, the term "assisted suicide" is typically used to describe what proponents refer to as medical aid in dying, in which a terminally ill adult is prescribed and self-administers barbiturates if they feel that they are suffering significantly. The term is often used interchangeably with physician-assisted suicide (PAS), "physician-assisted dying", "physician-assisted death", "assisted death" and "medical aid in dying" (MAiD).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Massachusetts Question 3</span> Referendum legalizing medical marijuana

The Massachusetts Medical Marijuana Initiative, appeared as the third question on the state's 2012 ballot as an indirect initiated state statute. The measure allows cannabis to be used for medical purposes in the state. The initiative—backed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Massachusetts Patient Advocacy Alliance, and the Committee for Compassionate Medicine—was filed with proponents turning in the required signatures to the Massachusetts Attorney General's office by the August 3, 2011 deadline. Those signatures were needed for the required ten qualified voters who submitted the original petition to put forward the full text of the law they want enacted. The initiative passed with support from 63% of state voters.

Act 39 of 2013 established the U.S. state of Vermont's Patient Choice and Control at End of Life Act, which legalizes medical aid in dying with certain restrictions. Vermont was the first state to enact this Law through legislative action; it permits some terminally ill patients to determine the time of their own death.

California End of Life Option Act is a law enacted in June 2016 by the California State Legislature which allows terminally ill adult residents in the state of California to access medical aid in dying by self-administering lethal drugs, provided specific circumstances are met. The law was signed in by California governor Jerry Brown in October 2015, making California the fifth state to allow physicians to prescribe drugs to end the life of a terminally ill patient, often referred to as physician-assisted suicide.

Three ballot measures were certified for the November 6, 2018, general election in the state of Massachusetts.

References

  1. "Attorney General Martha Coakley's Office Receives 31 Initiative Petitions Proposing 21 Laws and One Constitutional Amendment". Mass.gov. 2011-08-03. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
  2. 1 2 3 "11-12 Massachusetts Attorney General, Text of Measure" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  3. "Physician-assisted suicide - Question 2 - 2012 Massachusetts Election Results". Boston Globe. November 8, 2012. Retrieved November 10, 2012.
  4. Massachusetts Secretary of State, "2012 Information For Voters", Retrieved September 14, 2012
  5. "dignity2012.org". dignity2012.org. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  6. berkshireeagle.com. "Our opinion: Yes on Question 2". Berkshire Eagle. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Boston Herald, "Mass. petition aims to OK doctor-assisted suicide", August 24, 2011 Archived October 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  8. 1 2 "Cardinal rips suicide ballot effort". Boston.com. 2011-09-19. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  9. 1 2 Bell, Justin (December 12, 2011). "National Catholic Register, Massachusetts vs. Assisted Suicide". Ncregister.com. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  10. Lowell Sun, "Giving a choice to terminally ill patients", September 26, 2011
  11. Span, Paula (2011-10-26). "The Next Death-With-Dignity Battleground". Newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  12. "OPINION: Why the Mass. Death with Dignity Act should appear on the November ballot". Boston.com. 2012-01-04. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  13. 1 2 "Massachusetts religious communities divided over doctor-assisted suicide measure". Boston.com. 2012-09-10. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  14. "second-thoughts.org". second-thoughts.org. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  15. "massagainstassistedsuicide.org". massagainstassistedsuicide.org. 2012-11-03. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  16. "Death with dignity in Mass". Articles.boston.com. 2011-09-23. Archived from the original on January 18, 2013. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  17. "The Dangerous Assisted Suicide Ballot Measure in Massachusetts: 5 Key Facts | NRL News Today". Nationalrighttolifenews.org. 2011-12-15. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  18. "National Right to Life News, "The Dangerous Assisted Suicide Ballot Measure in Massachusetts: 5 Key Facts", December 15, 2011". Nationalrighttolifenews.org. 2011-12-15. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  19. "Mass Assisted Suicide Initiative: Jeanette Hall". Massagainstassistedsuicide.org. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  20. "She pushed for legal right to die, and - thankfully - was rebuffed". Massagainstassistedsuicide.org. October 4, 2011. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  21. "Push for "death with dignity" in Massachusetts picks up steam". Ama-assn.org. 2012-07-16. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  22. Allen, Evan (September 12, 2012). "Needham's Board of Health speaks out against medical marijuana ballot question". Boston.com. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  23. "Mass. critics of suicide question return $250,000". Boston.com. 2012-09-14. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  24. "Westborough Patch, "Doctor-Assisted Suicide: Most Support It, Do You? [POLL]", April 3, 2012". Archived from the original on April 9, 2012. Retrieved September 14, 2012.
  25. The Associated Press (June 4, 2012). "Massachusetts voters support medical marijuana and 'death with dignity' ballot initiatives". Masslive.com. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  26. "Public Policy Polling press release" (PDF). August 22, 2012. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  27. "Judicial Supreme Court of Massachusetts, case docket for "John Kelly et al vs. Martha Coakley, as she is the Attorney General and William Francis Galvin, as he is the Secretary of the Commonwealth"". Ma-appellatecourts.org. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  28. "Disability Rights Group Challenges Language for Assisted Suicide Ballot Measure as Misleading, Inaccurate, and Euphemistic". Prweb.com. May 17, 2012. Archived from the original on May 20, 2012. Retrieved 2013-04-13.
  29. "Mass Appellate Courts - Public Case Information". Ma-appellatecourts.org. Retrieved 2013-04-13.