Aberdeen Bestiary

Last updated

Aberdeen Bestiary
AberdeenBestiaryFolio005rAdamNamesAnimalsDetail.jpg
Adam naming the beasts, in an illustration from the Aberdeen Bestiary
DateEarly 13th Century
Genre Bestiary

The Aberdeen Bestiary (Aberdeen University Library, Univ Lib. MS 24) is a 12th-century English illuminated manuscript bestiary that was first listed in 1542 in the inventory of the Old Royal Library at the Palace of Westminster. [1] Due to similarities, it is often considered to be the "sister" manuscript of the Ashmole Bestiary. [1] The connection between the ancient Greek didactic text Physiologus and similar bestiary manuscripts is also often noted. [2] Information about the manuscript's origins and patrons are circumstantial, although the manuscript most likely originated from the 13th century and was owned by a wealthy ecclesiastical patron from north or south England. [2] Currently, the Aberdeen Bestiary resides in the Aberdeen University Library in Scotland. [3]

Contents

History

The Aberdeen Bestiary and the Ashmole Bestiary are considered by Xenia Muratova, a professor of art history, to be "the work of different artists belonging to the same artistic milieu." [4] Due to their "striking similarities" they are often compared and described by scholars as being "sister manuscripts." [4] [5] The medievalist scholar M. R. James considered the Aberdeen Bestiary ''a replica of Ashmole 1511" a view echoed by many other art historians. [5] [6]

Provenance

The original patron of both the Aberdeen and Ashmole Bestiary was considered to be a high-ranking member of society such as a prince, king or another high ranking church official or monastery. [1] However, since the section related to monastery life that was commonly depicted within the Aviarium manuscript was missing the original patron remains uncertain but it appears less likely to be a church member. [6] The Aberdeen Bestiary was kept in Church and monastic settings for a majority of its history. [1] However at some point it entered into the English royal collections library. [6] [5] The royal Westminster Library shelf stamp of King Henry the VIII is stamped on the side of the bestiary. [7] How King Henry acquired the manuscript remains unknown although it was probably taken from a monastery. [6] The manuscript appears to have been well-read by the family based on the amount of reading wear on the edges of the pages. [6] Around the time King James of Scotland became the King of England the bestiary was passed along to the Marischal College, Aberdeen. [2] [1] The manuscript is in fragmented condition as many illuminations on folios were removed individually as miniatures likely not for monetary but possibly for personal reasons. [2] The manuscript currently is in the Aberdeen Library in Scotland where it has remained since 1542. [3]

Description

Materials

The Aberdeen bestiary is a gilded [3] decorated manuscript featuring large miniatures and some of the finest pigment, parchment and gold leaf from its time. Some portions of the manuscript such as folio eight recto even feature tarnished silver leaf. [7] The original patron was wealthy enough to afford such materials so that the artists and scribes could enjoy creative freedom while creating the manuscripts. [6] The artists were professionally trained and experimented with new techniques - such as heavy washes mixed with light washes and dark thick lines and use of contrasting color. [4] The aqua color that is in the Aberdeen Bestiary is not present in the Ashmole Bestiary. [2] [6] The Aberdeen manuscript is loaded with filigree flora design and champie style gold leaf initials. [6] Canterbury is considered to be the original location of manufacture as the location was well known for manufacturing high-end luxury books during the thirteen century. [6] Its similarities with the Canterbury Paris Psalter tree style also further draws evidence of this relation. [6]

Style

The craftsmanship of both Ashmole and Aberdeen bestiary suggest similar artists and scribes. [6] Both the Ashmole and Aberdeen bestiary were probably made within 10 years of each other due to their stylistic and material similarities and the fact that both are crafted with the finest materials of their time. [6] Stylistically both manuscripts are very similar but the Aberdeen has figures that are both more voluminous and less energetic than those of the Ashmole Bestiary. [6] The color usage has been suggested as potentially Biblical in meaning as color usage had different interpretations in the early 13th century. [4] [2] The overall style of the human figures as well as color usage is very reminiscent of Roman mosaic art especially with the attention to detail in the drapery. [4] Circles and ovals semi-realistically depict highlights throughout the manuscript. [6] The way that animals are shaded in a Romanesque fashion with the use of bands to depict volume and form, which is similar to an earlier 12th-century Bury Bible made at Bury St.Edmunds. This Bestiary also shows stylistic similarities with the Paris Psalters of Canterbury. [6] The Aviary section is similar to the Aviariium which is a well-known 12th century monastic text. [7] The deviation from traditional color usage can be seen in the tiger, satyr, and unicorn folios as well as many other folios. [7] The satyr in the Aberdeen Bestiary when compared to the satyr section of the slightly older Worksop bestiary is almost identical. [3] [7] There are small color notes in the Aberdeen Bestiary that are often seen in similar manuscripts dating between 1175 and 1250 which help indicate that it was made near the year 1200 or 1210. [2] [6] These notes are similar to many other side notes written on the sides of pages throughout the manuscript and were probably by the painter to remind himself of special circumstances, these note occur irregularly throughout the text. [6] [8] [7]

Illuminations

Folio page 1 to 3 recto depicts the Genesis 1:1-25 which is represented with a large full page illumination Biblical Creation scene in the manuscript. [7] Folio 5 recto shows Adam, a large figure surrounded by gold leaf and towering over others, with the theme of 'Adam naming the animals' - this starts the compilation of the bestiary portion within the manuscript. Folio 5 verso depicts quadrupeds, livestock, wild beasts, and the concept of the herd. [7] Folio 7 to 18 recto depicts large cats and other beasts such as wolves, foxes and dogs. [7] Many pages from the start of the manuscript's bestiary section such as 11 verso featuring a hyena shows small pin holes which were likely used to map out and copy artwork to a new manuscript. [7] Folio 20 verso to 28 recto depicts livestock such as sheep, horses, and goats. [7] Small animals like cats and mice are depicted on folio 24 to 25. Pages 25 recto to 63 recto feature depictions of birds and [7] folio 64 recto to 80 recto depicts reptiles, worms and fish. [7] 77 recto to 91 verso depicts trees and plants and other elements of nature such as the nature of man. [7] The end folios of the manuscript from 93 recto to 100 recto depicts the nature of stones and rocks. [7]

Folio 56 Recto - Phoenix (detail) Phoenix detail from Aberdeen Bestiary.jpg
Folio 56 Recto - Phoenix (detail)

Seventeen of the Aberdeen manuscript pages are pricked for transfer in a process called pouncing such as clearly seen in the hyena folio as well as folio 3 recto and 3 verso depicting Genesis 1:26-1:28, 31, 1:1-2. [7] The pricking must have been done shortly after the creation of the Adam and Eve folio pages since there is not damage done to nearby pages. [7] Other pages used for pouncing include folio 7 recto to 18 verso which is the beginning of the beasts portion of the manuscript and likely depicted a lions as well as other big cats such as leopards, panthers and their characteristic as well as other large wild and domesticated beasts. [7]

Missing Folios

On folio 6 recto there was likely intended to be a depiction of a lion as in the Ashmole bestiary, but in this instance the pages were left blank although there are markings of margin lines. [7] In comparison to the Ashmole bestiary, on 9 verso some leaves are missing which should have likely contained imagery of the antelope (Antalops), unicorn (Unicornis), lynx (Lynx), griffin (Gryps), part of elephant (Elephans). Near folio 21 verso two illuminations of the ox (Bos), camel (Camelus), dromedary (Dromedarius), ass (Asinus), onager (Onager) and part of horse (Equus) are also assumed to be missing. [7] Also missing from folio 15 recto on are some leaves which should have contained crocodile (Crocodilus), manticore (Mantichora) and part of parandrus (Parandrus). [7] These missing folios are assumed from comparisons between the Ashmole and other related bestiaries. [2] [7]

Contents

Beasts (Bestiae)

Folio 66 Recto - Basilisk (detail) Aberdeen Bestiary Basilisk.jpg
Folio 66 Recto - Basilisk (detail)

Livestock (Pecora)

Small animals (Minuta animala)

Birds (Aves)

Folio 9 Recto - Panther (detail) AberdeenBestiaryFolio009rPantherDetail.jpg
Folio 9 Recto - Panther (detail)

Snakes and Reptiles (Serpentes)

Worms (Vermes)

Fish (Pisces)

Trees and Plants (Arbories)

Nature of Man (Natura hominis)

Stones (Lapides)

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bestiary</span> Compendium of beasts

A bestiary is a compendium of beasts. Originating in the ancient world, bestiaries were made popular in the Middle Ages in illustrated volumes that described various animals and even rocks. The natural history and illustration of each beast was usually accompanied by a moral lesson. This reflected the belief that the world itself was the Word of God and that every living thing had its own special meaning. For example, the pelican, which was believed to tear open its breast to bring its young to life with its own blood, was a living representation of Jesus. Thus the bestiary is also a reference to the symbolic language of animals in Western Christian art and literature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Isidore of Seville</span> Spanish bishop, confessor and Doctor of the Church (c.560-636)

Isidore of Seville was a Visigothic scholar and cleric. He is widely regarded, in the words of 19th-century historian Montalembert, as "the last scholar of the ancient world".

<i>Physiologus</i> Didactic Christian text

The Physiologus is a didactic Christian text written or compiled in Greek by an unknown author, in Alexandria; its composition has been traditionally dated to the 2nd century AD by readers who saw parallels with writings of Clement of Alexandria, who is asserted to have known the text, though Alan Scott has made a case for a date at the end of the 3rd or in the 4th century. The Physiologus consists of descriptions of animals, birds, and fantastic creatures, sometimes stones and plants, provided with moral content. Each animal is described, and an anecdote follows, from which the moral and symbolic qualities of the animal are derived. Manuscripts are often, but not always, given illustrations, often lavish.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siren (mythology)</span> Creature, half bird and half woman, who lured sailors by the sweetness of her song

In Greek mythology, the sirens were humanlike beings with alluring voices; they appear in a scene in the Odyssey in which Odysseus saves his crew's lives. Roman poets placed them on some small islands called Sirenum scopuli. In some later, rationalized traditions, the literal geography of the "flowery" island of Anthemoessa, or Anthemusa, is fixed: sometimes on Cape Pelorum and at others in the islands known as the Sirenuse, near Paestum, or in Capreae. All such locations were surrounded by cliffs and rocks.

<i>Etymologiae</i> Etymological encyclopedia compiled by Isidore of Seville

Etymologiae, also known as the Origines ("Origins") and usually abbreviated Orig., is an etymological encyclopedia compiled by Isidore of Seville towards the end of his life. Isidore was encouraged to write the book by his friend Braulio, Bishop of Saragossa. The Etymologies summarized and organized a wealth of knowledge from hundreds of classical sources; three of its books are derived largely from Pliny the Elder's Natural History. Isidore acknowledges Pliny, but not his other principal sources, namely Cassiodorus, Servius and Solinus. The work contains whatever Isidore, an influential Christian bishop, thought worth keeping.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manticore</span> Mythological beast

The manticore or mantichore is a Persian legendary creature similar to the Egyptian sphinx that proliferated in western European medieval art as well. It has the head of a human, the body of a lion and a tail of venomous spines similar to porcupine quills, while other depictions have it with the tail of a scorpion. There are some accounts that the spines can be shot like arrows, thus making the manticore a lethal predator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Mendoza</span> Aztec manuscript

The Codex Mendoza is an Aztec codex, believed to have been created around the year 1541. It contains a history of both the Aztec rulers and their conquests as well as a description of the daily life of pre-conquest Aztec society. The codex is written in the Nahuatl language using traditional Aztec pictograms with a translation and explanation of the text provided in Spanish. It is named after Don Antonio de Mendoza (1495-1552), the viceroy of New Spain, who supervised its creation and who was a leading patron of native artists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T and O map</span> Type of medieval world map

A T and O map or O–T or T–O map, also known as an Isidoran map, is a type of early world map that represents the physical world as first described by the 7th-century scholar Isidore of Seville in his De Natura Rerum and later his Etymologiae.

<i>Codex Gigas</i> 13th century manuscript compendium

The Codex Gigas is the largest extant medieval illuminated manuscript in the world, at a length of 92 cm (36 in). Very large illuminated bibles were a typical feature of Romanesque monastic book production, but even within this group, the page-size of the Codex Gigas is noted as exceptional. The manuscript is also known as the Devil's Bible, due to its highly unusual full-page portrait of Satan, and the legend surrounding its creation.

The cinnamon bird, also known as Cinnamologus, Cinomolgus, or Cynnamolgus is a mythical creature described in various bestiaries as a giant bird that collected cinnamon to build its nests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugh of Fouilloy</span>

Hugh of Fouilloy was a French cleric, prior of St.-Nicholas-de-Regny (1132) and St.-Laurent-au-Bois (1152). He is notable for writing De claustro animae and De medicina animae, allegorical texts on monastic spirituality. His De avibus, a moral treatise on birds was incorporated into many versions of the popular medieval bestiary.

Fécamp Bible

The Fécamp Bible is an illuminated Latin Bible. It was produced in Paris during the third quarter of the 13th century, and had previously belonged in the collection of Henry Yates Thompson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aspidochelone</span> Fabled sea creature

According to the tradition of the Physiologus and medieval bestiaries, the aspidochelone is a fabled sea creature, variously described as a large whale or vast sea turtle, and a giant sea monster with huge spines on the ridge of its back. No matter what form it is, it is always described as being so huge that it is often mistaken for an island and appears to be rocky with crevices and valleys with trees and greenery and having sand dunes all over it. The name aspidochelone appears to be a compound word combining Greek aspis, and chelone, the turtle. It rises to the surface from the depths of the sea, and entices unwitting sailors with its island appearance to make landfall on its huge shell and then the whale is able to pull them under the ocean, ship and all the people, drowning them. It also emits a sweet smell that lures fish into its trap where it then devours them. In the moralistic allegory of the Physiologus and bestiary tradition, the aspidochelone represents Satan, who deceives those whom he seeks to devour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pard</span> Greek word for leopard

A pard is the Greek word for the leopard, which is listed in Medieval bestiaries and in Pliny the Elder's book Natural History. Over the years, there have been many different depictions of the creature including some adaptations with and without manes and some in later years with shorter tails. However, one consistent representation shows them as large felines often with spots.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scitalis</span>

The Scitalis or Scytale is a serpent from Medieval bestiaries, such as the Aberdeen Bestiary, supposed to have such marvelous markings on its back that its appearance would stun the viewer, slowing the person down so that they could be caught. Its bodily heat was so great that it shed its skin even in the winter.

<i>Liber Floridus</i>

Liber Floridus is a medieval encyclopedia that was compiled between 1090 and 1120 by Lambert, Canon of Saint-Omer. The text compiles extracts from some 192 or so different works.

<i>Fons memorabilium universi</i>

Fons memorabilium universi is an early encyclopedia, written in Latin by the Italian humanist Domenico Bandini of Arezzo . Planned to inform and edify educated men who lack other books, the work covered God and the natural world, as was common for encyclopedias of the time, but also added a voluminous last part dealing with man and historical figures, philosophy and history, theology, ethics, heretics and women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rochester Bestiary</span>

The Rochester Bestiary is a richly illuminated manuscript copy of a medieval bestiary, a book describing the appearance and habits of a large number of familiar and exotic animals, both real and legendary. The animals' characteristics are frequently allegorised, with the addition of a Christian moral.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Worksop Bestiary</span>

The Worksop Bestiary, also known as the Morgan Bestiary, most likely from Lincoln or York, England, is an illuminated manuscript created around 1185, containing a bestiary and other compiled medieval Latin texts on natural history. The manuscript has influenced many other bestiaries throughout the medieval world and is possibly part of the same group as the Aberdeen Bestiary, Alnwick Bestiary, St.Petersburg Bestiary, and other similar Bestiaries. Now residing in the Morgan Library & Museum in New York, the manuscript has had a long history of church, royal, government, and scholarly ownership.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "History". University of Aberdeen. Retrieved 5 November 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Morrison, Grollemonde, Elizabeth, Larisa (2019). Book of Beasts: The Bestiary in the Medieval World. J.Paul Getty Museum. ISBN   978-1606065907.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Haupt, Lyanda Lynn (2013). Encountering the Everyday Wild. Little, Brown, and Company. ISBN   9780316178525.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Muratova, Xenia (1989). "Workshop Methods in English Late Twelfth-Century Illumination and the Production of Luxury Bestiaries". In Clark, Willene B.; McMunn, Meradith T. (eds.). Beasts and Birds of the Middle Ages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 53–63. ISBN   0-8122-8147-0.
  5. 1 2 3 James, M. R. (1928). The Bestiary. Oxford: Roxburghe Club. pp. 14ff., 55–59.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Clark, Willene (2006). The Second Family Bestiary: Commentary, Art, Text and Translation. Cornwall: The Boydell Press. p. 68. ISBN   0-85115-682-7.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 "The Aberdeen Bestiary - MS 24". University of Aberdeen.
  8. Stiremann, Patricia (1982). La France de Philippe Auguste. Le temps des mutations. Paris: Nouvelles pratiques en matiere d’enluminure au temps de Philippe Auguste. pp. 955–980.