Collective cell migration

Last updated

Collective cell migration describes the movements of group of cells and the emergence of collective behavior from cell-environment interactions and cell-cell communication. Collective cell migration is an essential process in the lives of multicellular organisms, e.g. embryonic development, wound healing and cancer spreading (metastasis). [1] Cells can migrate as a cohesive group (e.g. epithelial cells) or have transient cell-cell adhesion sites (e.g. mesenchymal cells). [2] They can also migrate in different modes like sheets, strands, tubes, and clusters. [3] While single-cell migration has been extensively studied, collective cell migration is a relatively new field with applications in preventing birth defects or dysfunction of embryos. It may improve cancer treatment by enabling doctors to prevent tumors from spreading and forming new tumors.

Contents

Cell-environment interactions

The environment of the migrating cell can affect its speed, persistence and direction of migration by stimulating it. The extracellular matrix (ECM) provides not only the structural and biochemical support, but also plays a major role in regulating cell behavior. Different ECM proteins (such as collagen, elastin, fibronectin, laminin, and others) allow cells to adhere and migrate, while forming focal adhesions in the front and disassembling them in the back. Using these adhesion sites, cells also sense the mechanical properties of the ECM. Cells can be guided by a gradient of those proteins (haptotaxis) or a gradient of soluble substrates in the liquid phase surrounding the cell (chemotaxis). Cells sense the substrate through their receptors and migrate toward the concentration (or the opposite direction). Another form of stimulation can be rigidity gradients of the ECM (durotaxis).[ citation needed ]

Confinement

Collective cell migration is enhanced by geometrical confinement of an extracellular matrix molecule (e.g. the proteoglycan versican in neural crest cells), that acts as a barrier, to promote the emergence of organized migration in separated streams. Confinement is also observed in vivo, where the optimal width is a function of the number of migrating cells in different streams of different species. [4]

Cell-cell communication

Migrating isolated cell responds to cues in its environment and changes its behavior accordingly. As cell-cell communication does not play a major role in this case, similar trajectories are observed in different isolated cells. However, when the cell migrates as part of the collective, it not only responds to its environment but also interacts with other cells through soluble substrates and physical contact. These cell-cell communication mechanisms are the main reasons for the difference between efficient migration of the collective and random walk movements of the isolated cell. Cell-cell communication mechanisms are widely studied experimentally (in vivo and in vitro), [5] and computationally (in silico). [6]

Co-attraction

Co-attraction between collectively migrating cells is the process by which cells of the same type secrete chemo-attractant (e.g. C3a in neural crest cells), that stimulates other cells in the group that have the receptors to that chemo-attractant. Cells sense the secreted substrate and respond to the stimulation by moving towards each other's and maintain high cell density. [7] [8]

Contact inhibition of locomotion

Contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) is a process in which the cell changes its direction of movement after colliding into another cell. Those cells could be of the same cell type or different types. The contacts (cell-junctions) are created by transmembrane glycoproteins named cadherins (E-cadherin, N-cadherin or cadherin 11) and other proteins. After cell-cell contact, the protrusions of cells in the contact direction are inhibited. In the CIL process, cells migrate away from each other by repolarizing in the new direction, so that new protrusions are formed in the front while contractions pull the back from contact.[ citation needed ]

Examples of studied systems

Models for studying collective cell migration
Red arrows show the direction of migration for each tissue Models for studying collective cell migration.jpg
Models for studying collective cell migration
Red arrows show the direction of migration for each tissue

Collective cell migration is studied over many model species.

Border cells in flies ( Drosophila melanogaster ): the border cells migrate during the differentiation of egg cells to be ready for fertilization. [11]

The lateral line in zebrafish: collective cell migration from head to tails is essential to the development of the sensory system of the fish. The sensors of the lateral line measure the flow over the body-surface of the fish. [12]

Wound healing: collective cell migration is an essential part in this healing process, wound area is closed by the migrating cells. [13] [14] Wound healing is commonly studied in vitro using cell lines such as Madin-Darby Canine Kidney cells.

Neural crest cells in mice, [15] Leghorn chicks, [16] amphibians ( Xenopus laevis ), [17] and fish [18] (zebrafish): collective migration of neural crest cells occurs during embryo development of vertebrates. They migrate long distances from the head (neural tube) to give rise to different tissues. [19]

Spreading of cancer (metastasis): common complication of cancer involve formation of new tumors (secondary tumors), as a result of migration of cancer cells from the primary tumor. Similar to collective cell migration in development and wound healing, cancer cells also undergo epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), that reduces cell-cell adhesions and allows cancer spreading. [20]

The diagram on the right shows:

Mathematical models

There are several mathematical models that describe collective cell motion. Typically, a Newtonian equation of motion for a system of cells is solved. [21] Several forces act on each individual cell, examples are friction (between environment and other cells), chemotaxis and self-propulsion. The latter implies that cells are active matter far from thermal equilibrium that are able to generate force due to myosin-actin contractile motion. An overview over physical description of collective cell migration [22] explains that the following types of models can be used:

These mathematical models give some insight in complex phenomena like cancer, wound healing [24] and ectoplasms.

Chemotaxis of a cell up a fixed gradient.jpg
Chemotaxis of a cell up a fixed (left, blue) and cell-induced, or self-generated, gradient (right, green) of chemoattractant. Lines show the concentration (c) of chemoattractant along space (x), in which cells (ellipses) migrate. Darker shapes illustrate successive time-points. [25]
Spectrum of cell-cell interactions from repulsive to volume exclusion.jpg
Spectrum of cell–cell interactions, from repulsive interactions (left, blue) to volume exclusion (right, green). With repulsive interactions, cells move away from the point of contact with another cell (second cell shown as stationary for simplicity). With volume exclusion, cells block each other's movement, but can move to any space not occupied by another cell. [25]

Spectrum of collective cell migration

In the diagram immediately below, different morphologies of collective cell migration are characterized by their cohesiveness during migration (inversely related to density), as well as the number of nearest neighbours with which a cell interacts while moving (i.e. the topological arrangement of individual cells in the population). Cells (ellipses) can migrate in linear chains (top left), with persistent contact to cells either side of them, or along trails formed by preceding cells (bottom left). In migrating sheets, cells may maintain most of their nearest neighbours over time (top right), whereas in streaming migration cell–cell contacts occur at longer range and with potentially frequent neighbour rearrangement (bottom right). These concepts easily extend to three-dimensional migration, in which case the place of migrating sheets can be taken by moving clusters or spheroids. [25]

Spectrum of collective cell migration Spectrum of collective cell migration.jpg
Spectrum of collective cell migration

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zebrafish</span> Species of fish

The zebrafish is a freshwater fish belonging to the minnow family (Cyprinidae) of the order Cypriniformes. Native to India and South Asia, it is a popular aquarium fish, frequently sold under the trade name zebra danio. It is also found in private ponds.

Morphogenesis is the biological process that causes a cell, tissue or organism to develop its shape. It is one of three fundamental aspects of developmental biology along with the control of tissue growth and patterning of cellular differentiation.

<i>Xenopus</i> Genus of amphibians

Xenopus is a genus of highly aquatic frogs native to sub-Saharan Africa. Twenty species are currently described within it. The two best-known species of this genus are Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis, which are commonly studied as model organisms for developmental biology, cell biology, toxicology, neuroscience and for modelling human disease and birth defects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blastulation</span> Sphere of cells formed during early embryonic development in animals

Blastulation is the stage in early animal embryonic development that produces the blastula. In mammalian development the blastula develops into the blastocyst with a differentiated inner cell mass and an outer trophectoderm. The blastula is a hollow sphere of cells known as blastomeres surrounding an inner fluid-filled cavity called the blastocoel. Embryonic development begins with a sperm fertilizing an egg cell to become a zygote, which undergoes many cleavages to develop into a ball of cells called a morula. Only when the blastocoel is formed does the early embryo become a blastula. The blastula precedes the formation of the gastrula in which the germ layers of the embryo form.

Mechanotaxis refers to the directed movement of cell motility via mechanical cues. In response to fluidic shear stress, for example, cells have been shown to migrate in the direction of the fluid flow. Mechanotaxis is critical in many normal biological processes in animals, such as gastrulation, inflammation, and repair in response to a wound, as well as in mechanisms of diseases such as tumor metastasis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cadherin</span> Calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule

Cadherins (named for "calcium-dependent adhesion") are cell adhesion molecules important in forming adherens junctions that let cells adhere to each other. Cadherins are a class of type-1 transmembrane proteins, and they depend on calcium (Ca2+) ions to function, hence their name. Cell-cell adhesion is mediated by extracellular cadherin domains, whereas the intracellular cytoplasmic tail associates with numerous adaptors and signaling proteins, collectively referred to as the cadherin adhesome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neural plate</span>

The neural plate is a key developmental structure that serves as the basis for the nervous system. Cranial to the primitive node of the embryonic primitive streak, ectodermal tissue thickens and flattens to become the neural plate. The region anterior to the primitive node can be generally referred to as the neural plate. Cells take on a columnar appearance in the process as they continue to lengthen and narrow. The ends of the neural plate, known as the neural folds, push the ends of the plate up and together, folding into the neural tube, a structure critical to brain and spinal cord development. This process as a whole is termed primary neurulation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neural crest</span> Pluripotent embyronic cell group giving rise to diverse cell lineages

Neural crest cells are a temporary group of cells that arise from the embryonic ectoderm germ layer, and in turn give rise to a diverse cell lineage—including melanocytes, craniofacial cartilage and bone, smooth muscle, peripheral and enteric neurons and glia.

The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process by which epithelial cells lose their cell polarity and cell–cell adhesion, and gain migratory and invasive properties to become mesenchymal stem cells; these are multipotent stromal cells that can differentiate into a variety of cell types. EMT is essential for numerous developmental processes including mesoderm formation and neural tube formation. EMT has also been shown to occur in wound healing, in organ fibrosis and in the initiation of metastasis in cancer progression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mesenchyme</span> Type of animal embryonic connective tissue

Mesenchyme is a type of loosely organized animal embryonic connective tissue of undifferentiated cells that give rise to most tissues, such as skin, blood or bone. The interactions between mesenchyme and epithelium help to form nearly every organ in the developing embryo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epiboly</span>

Epiboly describes one of the five major types of cell movements that occur in the gastrulation stage of embryonic development of some organisms. Epiboly is the spreading and thinning of the ectoderm while the endoderm and mesoderm layers move to the inside of the embryo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Otic vesicle</span> Two sac-like invaginations formed and subsequently closed off during embryonic development

Otic vesicle, or auditory vesicle, consists of either of the two sac-like invaginations formed and subsequently closed off during embryonic development. It is part of the neural ectoderm, which will develop into the membranous labyrinth of the inner ear. This labyrinth is a continuous epithelium, giving rise to the vestibular system and auditory components of the inner ear. During the earlier stages of embryogenesis, the otic placode invaginates to produce the otic cup. Thereafter, the otic cup closes off, creating the otic vesicle. Once formed, the otic vesicle will reside next to the neural tube medially, and on the lateral side will be paraxial mesoderm. Neural crest cells will migrate rostral and caudal to the placode.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SNAI2</span> Protein

Zinc finger protein SNAI2 is a transcription factor that in humans is encoded by the SNAI2 gene. It promotes the differentiation and migration of certain cells and has roles in initiating gastrulation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cadherin-1</span> Human protein-coding gene

Cadherin-1 or Epithelial cadherin(E-cadherin), is a protein that in humans is encoded by the CDH1 gene. Mutations are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid, and ovarian cancers. CDH1 has also been designated as CD324. It is a tumor suppressor gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homeobox protein goosecoid</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Homeobox protein goosecoid(GSC) is a homeobox protein that is encoded in humans by the GSC gene. Like other homeobox proteins, goosecoid functions as a transcription factor involved in morphogenesis. In Xenopus, GSC is thought to play a crucial role in the phenomenon of the Spemann-Mangold organizer. Through lineage tracing and timelapse microscopy, the effects of GSC on neighboring cell fates could be observed. In an experiment that injected cells with GSC and observed the effects of uninjected cells, GSC recruited neighboring uninjected cells in the dorsal blastopore lip of the Xenopus gastrula to form a twinned dorsal axis, suggesting that the goosecoid protein plays a role in the regulation and migration of cells during gastrulation.

Chemical genetics is the investigation of the function of proteins and signal transduction pathways in cells by the screening of chemical libraries of small molecules. Chemical genetics is analogous to classical genetic screen where random mutations are introduced in organisms, the phenotype of these mutants is observed, and finally the specific gene mutation (genotype) that produced that phenotype is identified. In chemical genetics, the phenotype is disturbed not by introduction of mutations, but by exposure to small molecule tool compounds. Phenotypic screening of chemical libraries is used to identify drug targets or to validate those targets in experimental models of disease. Recent applications of this topic have been implicated in signal transduction, which may play a role in discovering new cancer treatments. Chemical genetics can serve as a unifying study between chemistry and biology. The approach was first proposed by Tim Mitchison in 1994 in an opinion piece in the journal Chemistry & Biology entitled "Towards a pharmacological genetics".

Neural crest cells are multipotent cells required for the development of cells, tissues and organ systems. A subpopulation of neural crest cells are the cardiac neural crest complex. This complex refers to the cells found amongst the midotic placode and somite 3 destined to undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transformation and migration to the heart via pharyngeal arches 3, 4 and 6.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Developmental bioelectricity</span> Electric current produced in living cells

Developmental bioelectricity is the regulation of cell, tissue, and organ-level patterning and behavior by electrical signals during the development of embryonic animals and plants. The charge carrier in developmental bioelectricity is the ion rather than the electron, and an electric current and field is generated whenever a net ion flux occurs. Cells and tissues of all types use flows of ions to communicate electrically. Endogenous electric currents and fields, ion fluxes, and differences in resting potential across tissues comprise a signalling system. It functions along with biochemical factors, transcriptional networks, and other physical forces to regulate cell behaviour and large-scale patterning in processes such as embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer suppression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carole LaBonne</span> Developmental and Stem Cell Biologist

Carole LaBonne is a Developmental and Stem Cell Biologist at Northwestern University. She is the Erastus O. Haven Professor of Life Sciences, and Chair of the Department of Molecular Biosciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grainyhead-like gene family</span> Family of highly conserved genes for transcription factors in animals

Grainyhead-like genes are a family of highly conserved transcription factors that are functionally and structurally homologous across a large number of vertebrate and invertebrate species. For an estimated 100 million years or more, this genetic family has been evolving alongside life to fine tune the regulation of epithelial barrier integrity during development, fine-tuning epithelial barrier establishment, maintenance and subsequent homeostasis. The three main orthologues, Grainyhead-like 1, 2 and 3, regulate numerous genetic pathways within different organisms and perform analogous roles between them, ranging from neural tube closure, wound healing, establishment of the craniofacial skeleton and repair of the epithelium. When Grainyhead-like genes are impaired, due to genetic mutations in embryogenesis, it will cause the organism to present with developmental defects that largely affect ectodermal tissues in which they are expressed. These subsequent congenital disorders, including cleft lip and exencephaly, vary greatly in their severity and impact on the quality of life for the affected individual. There is much still to learn about the function of these genes and the more complex roles of Grainyhead-like genes are yet to be discovered.

References

  1. Friedl, P; Hegerfeldt, Y; Tusch, M (2004). "Collective cell migration in morphogenesis and cancer". The International Journal of Developmental Biology . 48 (5–6): 441–9. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041821pf . PMID   15349818.
  2. Weijer, CJ (15 September 2009). "Collective cell migration in development". Journal of Cell Science . 122 (Pt 18): 3215–23. doi: 10.1242/jcs.036517 . PMID   19726631. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  3. Friedl, P (February 2004). "Prespecification and plasticity: shifting mechanisms of cell migration". Current Opinion in Cell Biology . 16 (1): 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2003.11.001. PMID   15037300.
  4. Szabó, András; Melchionda, Manuela; Nastasi, Giancarlo; Woods, Mae L.; Campo, Salvatore; Perris, Roberto; Mayor, Roberto (6 June 2016). "In vivo confinement promotes collective migration of neural crest cells". Journal of Cell Biology . 213 (5): 543–555. doi:10.1083/jcb.201602083. PMC   4896058 . PMID   27241911.
  5. Mayor, R; Etienne-Manneville, S (February 2016). "The front and rear of collective cell migration" (PDF). Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology . 17 (2): 97–109. doi:10.1038/nrm.2015.14. PMID   26726037. S2CID   27261044.
  6. Szabó, A; Mayor, R (October 2016). "Modelling collective cell migration of neural crest". Current Opinion in Cell Biology . 42: 22–28. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.023. PMC   5017515 . PMID   27085004.
  7. Woods, ML; Carmona-Fontaine, C; Barnes, CP; Couzin, ID; Mayor, R; Page, KM (2014). "Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions". PLoS ONE . 9 (9): e104969. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j4969W. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104969 . PMC   4152153 . PMID   25181349.
  8. Carmona-Fontaine, C; Theveneau, E; Tzekou, A; Tada, M; Woods, M; Page, KM; Parsons, M; Lambris, JD; Mayor, R (13 December 2011). "Complement fragment C3a controls mutual cell attraction during collective cell migration". Developmental Cell . 21 (6): 1026–37. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.012. PMC   3272547 . PMID   22118769.
  9. Stoker, MG; Rubin, H (8 July 1967). "Density dependent inhibition of cell growth in culture". Nature. 215 (5097): 171–2. Bibcode:1967Natur.215..171S. doi:10.1038/215171a0. PMID   6049107. S2CID   4150783.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Barriga, Elias H.; Mayor, Roberto (2019). "Adjustable viscoelasticity allows for efficient collective cell migration". Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 93: 55–68. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.05.027. PMC   6854469 . PMID   29859995. CC-BY icon.svg Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  11. Bianco, A; Poukkula, M; Cliffe, A; Mathieu, J; Luque, CM; Fulga, TA; Rørth, P (19 July 2007). "Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells". Nature. 448 (7151): 362–5. Bibcode:2007Natur.448..362B. doi:10.1038/nature05965. PMID   17637670. S2CID   4369682.
  12. Dalle Nogare, D; Somers, K; Rao, S; Matsuda, M; Reichman-Fried, M; Raz, E; Chitnis, AB (August 2014). "Leading and trailing cells cooperate in collective migration of the zebrafish posterior lateral line primordium". Development. 141 (16): 3188–96. doi:10.1242/dev.106690. PMC   4197546 . PMID   25063456.
  13. Grada A (February 2017). "Analysis of Collective Cell Migration Using the Wound Healing Assay". J Invest Dermatol. 137 (2): e11–e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.11.020 . PMID   28110712.
  14. Trepat, Xavier; Wasserman, Michael R.; Angelini, Thomas E.; Millet, Emil; Weitz, David A.; Butler, James P.; Fredberg, Jeffrey J. (3 May 2009). "Physical forces during collective cell migration". Nature Physics . 5 (6): 426–430. Bibcode:2009NatPh...5..426T. doi: 10.1038/nphys1269 .
  15. Trainor, PA (December 2005). "Specification of neural crest cell formation and migration in mouse embryos". Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 16 (6): 683–93. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.06.007. PMID   16043371.
  16. Johnston, MC (October 1966). "A radioautographic study of the migration and fate of cranial neural crest cells in the chick embryo". The Anatomical Record . 156 (2): 143–55. doi:10.1002/ar.1091560204. PMID   5969670. S2CID   11251193.
  17. Sadaghiani, B; Thiébaud, CH (November 1987). "Neural crest development in the Xenopus laevis embryo, studied by interspecific transplantation and scanning electron microscopy". Developmental Biology. 124 (1): 91–110. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(87)90463-5. PMID   3666314.
  18. Smith, M.; Hickman, A.; Amanze, D.; Lumsden, A.; Thorogood, P. (23 May 1994). "Trunk neural crest origin of caudal fin mesenchyme in the zebrafish Brachydanio rerio". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 256 (1346): 137–145. Bibcode:1994RSPSB.256..137S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0061. JSTOR   50346. S2CID   86494317.
  19. Le Douarin, Nicole, and Chaya Kalcheim. The neural crest. No. 36. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  20. Thiery, JP; Acloque, H; Huang, RY; Nieto, MA (25 November 2009). "Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease". Cell . 139 (5): 871–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007 . PMID   19945376. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  21. Akiyama, Masakazu; Sushida, Takamichi; Ishida, Sumire; Haga, Hisashi (2017). "Mathematical model of collective cell migrations based on cell polarity". Development, Growth & Differentiation. 59 (5): 471–490. doi: 10.1111/dgd.12381 . ISSN   1440-169X. PMID   28714585.
  22. Alert, Ricard; Trepat, Xavier (2020-03-10). "Physical Models of Collective Cell Migration". Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics. 11 (1): 77–101. arXiv: 1905.07675 . Bibcode:2020ARCMP..11...77A. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013516. ISSN   1947-5454. S2CID   159041328.
  23. Chauviere, A.; Hillen, T.; Preziosi, L. (2007). "Modeling cell movement in anisotropic and heterogeneous network tissues". Networks & Heterogeneous Media. 2 (2): 333–357. doi:10.3934/nhm.2007.2.333. ISSN   1556-181X.
  24. Arciero, Julia C.; Mi, Qi; Branca, Maria F.; Hackam, David J.; Swigon, David (2011-02-02). "Continuum Model of Collective Cell Migration in Wound Healing and Colony Expansion". Biophysical Journal. 100 (3): 535–543. Bibcode:2011BpJ...100..535A. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.083. ISSN   0006-3495. PMC   3030184 . PMID   21281567.
  25. 1 2 3 4 Schumacher, Linus J.; Kulesa, Paul M.; McLennan, Rebecca; Baker, Ruth E.; Maini, Philip K. (2016). "Multidisciplinary approaches to understanding collective cell migration in developmental biology". Open Biology. 6 (6): 160056. doi:10.1098/rsob.160056. PMC   4929938 . PMID   27278647. CC-BY icon.svg Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.