Dating the Tirukkural

Last updated June 04, 2024

The dating of the Tirukkural, and by extension the period of its author Valluvar, has been a subject of intense debate among scholars for centuries, and it continues to remain so. The Kural is variously dated between 300 BCE and 5th century CE. According to Blackburn, the "current scholarly consensus" dates the text and the author to approximately 500 CE.^[1] The Tamil Nadu government has ratified 31 BCE as the year of birth of Valluvar.^[2] Still the precise date as to when Valluvar completed writing the Kural text remains murky. This article speaks about various dates arrived at by various scholars over time.

Dating bases

The Tirukkural belongs to the Late-Sangam period and has been listed as one of the chief text of the Sangam corpus. However, scholars find it difficult to ascertain the exact period of the text and its author and have employed, besides archaeological research, various historical references and linguistic methodologies to arrive at a date.^[3]

The following are some of the linguistic methodologies scholars use to date the Kural text:^[4]

Comparing the text with other contemporary Sanskrit texts and finding out the date by the relevance found in them.
Finding out the date on the basis of the number of Sanskrit loan words found in the Kural literature.
Arriving at a date on the basis of the meaning of certain terms as suggested by early commentators.

The Sangam texts were historically grouped as the Eighteen Greater Texts (which includes the Ten Idylls and the Eight Anthologies) and the Eighteen Lesser Texts in that order. Many scholars count only the Eighteen Greater Texts as proper Sangam texts and refer to the Eighteen Lesser Texts as the late-Sangam works. The Kural literature, which has been traditionally listed under the Eighteen Lesser Texts group, is the oldest of this group.^[5] Evidently, there is no mention about Valluvar in any of the proper Sangam texts. Thus, scholars conclude that the Kural literature appeared only after the Ten Idylls and the Eight Anthologies texts.^[6]

In the earliest Sangam literature, verses were composed mostly in the asiriyappa metre. Later texts were written in the vanjippa metre. Other metres such as kalippa, paripaadal, and venpa appeared much later. Verses in all the proper Sangam texts appear in the asiriyappa, kalippa, and paripaadal metres. The Kural couplets were composed in the venpa metre. Thus, Kural is said to have been composed after the Ten Idylls and the Eight Anthologies texts.^[6]

The Kural literature has been dated variously from 300 BCE to 7th century CE. According to traditional accounts, it was the last work of the third Sangam, appearing before other post-Sangam texts,^[6] and was subjected to a divine test (which it passed). The scholars who uphold this tradition, such as Somasundara Bharathiar and M. Rajamanickam, date the text to as early as 300 BCE. Historian K. K. Pillay assigned it to the early 1st century CE.^[7]

Content-based dating

While the earlier Sangam texts approved of, and even glorified,^[8] the four immoral deeds of meat-eating, alcohol consumption, polygamy, and prostitution, the Kural literature strongly condemns these as crimes.^[6]^[9] Moreover, it was the Kural text that condemned these as crimes for the first time in the history of the Tamil land.^[10]^[11]^[12] Thus, scholars find this as another reason to place the Kural text after the proper Sangam era.^[6]

Historical dating

Scholars who consider Kural to be a work of the 1st century BCE include J. M. Nallaswamy Pillai,^[13] D. P. Palaniyappa Pillai,^[14] C. Rajagopalachari,^[14] C. Dhandapani Desikar,^[4] M. Rajamanickam,^[15]^[16] V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar,^[16] Maraimalai Adigal,^[16]^[17] and Tarlochan Singh Bedi.^[18] According to these scholars, there are many evidences that put Valluvar's date during or before the 1st century BCE. For instance, in his work Description of Ceylon (1726), Dutch scholar and Christian missionary François Valentijn quotes Seneca the Younger's (c. 4 BCE–65 CE) mentioning of the Tirukkural in his works, hinting that Valluvar must have lived during or before Seneca the Younger's time: "Tiriwalluwir: One of their best prayer books, composed in clear and concise verses by Thiruwalluwer. Those who can read and understand him, can also understand the most difficult poets. This writer, according to the writings of Seneca, lived over 1500 years ago at Mailapore."^[19]

In his 1969 book, C. Dandapani Desikar cites the work Studies in Tamil Literature, which lists several historical evidences about Valluvar's period:^[4]

Elaela Singan Chettiyar, historically known as a contemporary and friend of Valluvar, who has been mentioned as Elaela and Alara in Ceylon history, lived between 144 BCE and 101 BCE.
Tiruvalluva Maalai, a collection of paeans praising the Kural text and Valluvar, was written by various late-Sangam authors, some of whom lived during the 1st century BCE.
Mamulanar, one of the contributors of the Tiruvalluva Maalai, has mentioned about the Ganges flood in Pataliputra. However, he has not mentioned about the Pataliputra fire during the 1st century CE. This shows that Mamulanar lived before 1st century CE.
The Kural text's books on aram and porul bear semblance with various Sanskrit texts such as the Dharma Shastra and Artha Shastra. Koutilya (371 BCE–283 BCE) authored the Artha Shastra during the 4th century BCE. If the Kural were based on these, it must have been authored no later than a couple of centuries.
The Kural text is divided into three parts, which was a common practice during the period of the writing of works such as Panchatantra, Hitopadesha, Kamandaka, and other texts, which makes them a contemporary of the Kural literature.^[4]

Linguistic dating

Opining that the Kural literature does not belong to the Sangam period, Czech linguist Kamil Zvelebil dates it to somewhere between 450 and 500 CE.^[7] His estimate is based on the language of the Kural text, its allusions to the earlier works, and its borrowing from some Sanskrit treatises.^[20] Zvelebil notes that the Kural text features several grammatical innovations, that are absent in the older Sangam literature. The Kural text also features a higher number of Sanskrit loan words compared with these older Sangam texts.^[21] According to Zvelebil, besides being part of the ancient Tamil literary tradition, Valluvar was also a part of the "one great Indian ethical, didactic tradition," as a few of his verses seem to bear similarities with the verses in Sanskrit texts such as Mānavadharmaśāstra and Kautilya's Arthaśāstra .^[22]

S. Vaiyapuri Pillai assigned the work to c. 650 CE, believing that it borrowed from some Sanskrit works of the 6th century CE.^[7] Zvelebil disagrees with this assessment, pointing out that some of the words that Vaiyapuri Pillai believed to be Sanskrit loan words have now been proved to be of Dravidian origin by Thomas Burrow and Murray Barnson Emeneau.^[22] Many Christian missionaries, such as George Uglow Pope ^[23] and Robert Caldwell,^[24] even pushed the date further down to between 800 and 1000 CE, claiming that “Christian Scriptures were among the sources from which the poet derived his inspiration.”^[23] However, scholars, including Zvelebil, J. M. Nallaswamy Pillai, Sundaram Pillai, Kanakasabai Pillai, and Krishnaswamy Aiyengar, and even missionaries such as John Lazarus refute such claims.^[24]^[25]^[26] Albert Schweitzer hinted that “the dating of the Kural has suffered, along with so many other literary and historical dates, philosophies and mythologies of India, a severe mauling at the hands of the Christian Missionaries, anxious to post-date all irrefutable examples of religious maturity to the Christian era.”^[27] Zvelebil points out to the Kural's unwavering emphasis on the ethics of moral vegetarianism (Chapter 26) and non-killing (Chapter 33), as against any of the Abrahamic religious texts,^[28]^[29] which suggests that the ethics of the Kural is rather a reflection of the Jaina moral code than of Christian ethics.^[25] Nallaswamy Pillai declares Pope's claim as "an absurd literary anachronism" and says that the first two books of the Kural in particular are "a stumbling block which can browbeat the most sublime ideas of Christian morality."^[26] John Lazarus and Maharajan observe that, in stark contrast to the Bible's concept of killing, which refers only to the taking away of human life, the Kural's concept of killing pertains to both humans and animals as it "deals exclusively with the literal taking away of life."^[30]^[31]^[32]

Notwithstanding the incessant debate on the precise date, taking the latest of the estimated dates, the Tamil Nadu government officially declared 31 BCE as the year of Valluvar, as suggested by Maraimalai Adigal, in 1921.^[16]^[7]^[33]^[34] On 18 January 1935, Valluvar Year was officially added to the calendar.^[17]

Citations

↑ Blackburn 2000, p. 454 with footnote 7.
↑ Iraikkuruvanar, 2009, p. 72.
↑ Thamizhannal, 2004, pp. 141–143.
1 2 3 4 Desikar, 1969, pp. 128–130.
↑ Kovaimani and Nagarajan, 2013, p. 237.
1 2 3 4 5 Sundaramurthi, 2000, pp. 403–408.
1 2 3 4 Zvelebil 1975, p. 124.
↑ Sivagnanam, 1974, p. 8.
↑ Mahadevan, 1985, pp. 193–195.
↑ Sivagnanam, 1974, pp. 10, 11, 96.
↑ Kovaimani and Nagarajan, 2013, pp. 176–181, 328–334.
↑ Thamizhannal, 2004, p. 146.
↑ Manavalan, 2009, p. 23.
1 2 Desikar, 1969, p. 130.
↑ Rajamanickam, 1963, pp. 122–123.
1 2 3 4 Thamizhannal, 2004, p. 141.
1 2 Thiruvalluvar Ninaivu Malar, 1935, p. 117.
↑ Bedi, 2012, pp. xiii–xix.
↑ Arasaratnam, 1978, p. 61.
↑ Zvelebil, 1973, p. 156.
↑ Zvelebil, 1973, p. 169.
1 2 Zvelebil, 1973, p. 171.
1 2 Pope, 1886, p. iv (Introduction).
1 2 Manavalan, 2009, p. 39.
1 2 Zvelebil, 1973, pp. 156–171.
1 2 Manavalan, 2009, pp. 26–27.
↑ Schweitzer, 2013, pp. 200–205 (cited in Shakti, Volume 5, 1968, p. 29).
↑ Deuteronomy 14:3–14:29
↑ Quran 5:1-5
↑ Manavalan, 2009, p. 42.
↑ Maharajan, 2017, p. 72.
↑ Anandan, 2018, p. 319.
↑ Arumugam, 2014, pp. 5, 15.
↑ Hindustan Times, 16 January 2020.

Related Research Articles

Thiruvalluvar, commonly known as Valluvar, was an Indian poet and philosopher. He is best known as the author of the Tirukkuṟaḷ, a collection of couplets on ethics, political and economic matters, and love. The text is considered an exceptional and widely cherished work of Tamil literature.

Parimelalhagar, sometimes spelled Parimelazhagar, born Vanduvarai Perumal, was a Tamil poet and scholar known for his commentary on the Thirukkural. He was the last among the canon of ten medieval commentators of the Kural text most highly esteemed by scholars. He was also among the five oldest commentators whose commentaries had been preserved and made available to the Modern era, the others being Manakkudavar, Pari Perumal, Kaalingar, and Paridhi. Of all the ancient commentaries available of the Kural literature, Parimelalhagar's commentary is considered by scholars as the best both in textual and literary aspects. The codification of the writings of Valluvar is attributed to Parimelalhagar. Parimelalhagar also remains the most reviewed, in terms of both praise and criticism, of all the medieval Kural commentators. Praised for its literary richness and clarity, Parimelalhagar's commentary is considered highly complex and exquisite in its own right that it has several scholarly commentaries appearing over the centuries to elucidate it. Along with the Kural text, Parimelalhagar's commentary has been widely published that it is in itself regarded a Tamil classic.

The Tirukkuṟaḷ, or shortly theKural, is a classic Tamil language text consisting of 1,330 short couplets, or kurals, of seven words each. The text is divided into three books with aphoristic teachings on virtue (aram), wealth (porul) and love (inbam), respectively. It is widely acknowledged for its universality and secular nature. Its authorship is traditionally attributed to Valluvar, also known in full as Thiruvalluvar. The text has been dated variously from 300 BCE to 5th century CE. The traditional accounts describe it as the last work of the third Sangam, but linguistic analysis suggests a later date of 450 to 500 CE and that it was composed after the Sangam period.

The Tirukkural, shortly known as the Kural, is a classic Tamil sangam treatise on the art of living. Consisting of 133 chapters with 1330 couplets or kurals, it deals with the everyday virtues of an individual. Authored by Valluvar between the first century BCE and 5th century CE, it is considered one of the greatest works ever written on ethics and morality and is praised for its universality and non-denominational nature.

Tirukkural, also known as the Kural, an ancient Indian treatise on the ethics and morality of the commoner, is one of the most widely translated non-religious works in the world. Authored by the ancient Tamil poet-philosopher Thiruvalluvar, it has been translated into at least 42 world languages, with about 57 different renderings in the English language alone.

John Lazarus (1845–1925) was a Christian missionary to India who rendered the Tirukkural into English. He revised the work of his predecessor William Henry Drew, who had already translated the first 63 chapters of the Tirukkural, and translated the remaining portion of the Kural text.

Tirukkural remains one of the most widely translated non-religious works in the world. As of 2014, there were at least 57 versions available in the English language alone. English, thus, continues to remain the language with most number of translations available of the Kural text.

Manakkudavar was a Tamil scholar and commentator known for his commentary on the Tirukkural. His is the earliest of the available commentaries on the Kural text, and hence considered to bear closest semblance with the original work by Valluvar. He was among the canon of Ten Medieval Commentators of the Kural text most highly esteemed by scholars. He was also among the five ancient commentators whose commentaries had been preserved and made available to the Modern era, the others being Pari Perumal, Kaalingar, Paridhi, and Parimelalhagar.

The Ten Medieval Commentators were a canonical group of Tamil scholars whose commentaries on the ancient Indian didactic work of the Kural are esteemed by later scholars as worthy of critical analysis. These scholars lived in the Medieval era between the 10th and 13th centuries CE. Among these medieval commentaries, the commentaries of Manakkudavar, Kaalingar, and Parimelalhagar are considered pioneer by modern scholars.

The Book ofAṟam, in full Aṟattuppāl, also known as the Book of Virtue, the First Book or Book One in translated versions, is the first of the three books or parts of the Kural literature, a didactic work authored by the ancient Indian philosopher Valluvar. Written in High Tamil distich form, it has 38 chapters each containing 10 kurals or couplets, making a total of 380 couplets, all dealing with the fundamental virtues of an individual. Aṟam, the Tamil term that loosely corresponds to the English term 'virtue', correlates with the first of the four ancient Indian values of dharma, artha, kama and moksha. The Book of Aṟam exclusively deals with virtues independent of the surroundings, including the vital principles of non-violence, moral vegetarianism,^[a] veracity, and righteousness.

Tiruvalluva Malai is an anthology of ancient Tamil paeans containing fifty-five verses each attributed to different poets praising the ancient work of the Kural and its author Tiruvalluvar. With the poets' time spanning across centuries starting from around 1st century CE, the collection is believed to have reached its present form by 10th century CE. With the historical details of the ancient philosopher and his work remaining obscure, much of the legend on the Kural and Tiruvalluvar as they are known today are chiefly from this work. The collection also reveals the name of the author of the Kural text as 'Tiruvalluvar' for the first time, as Tiruvalluvar himself composed the Kural text centuries earlier without indicating his name anywhere in his work. Reminiscing this, E. S. Ariel, a French scholar of the 19th century, famously said of the Tirukkural thus: Ce livre sans nom, par un autre sans nom.

Tirukkural, or the Kural, an ancient Indian treatise on common moralities, has been given by various names ever since its writing between the first century BCE and the 5th century CE. Originally referred to as Muppāl, perhaps as presented by its author Valluvar himself at the ruler's court, the work remains unique among ancient works in that it was not given any title by its author himself. All the names that the work is referred by today are given by later days' scholars over the millennia. The work is known by an estimated 44 names excluding variants, although some scholars list even more. E. S. Ariel, a French scholar of the 19th century who translated the work into French, famously said of the Kural thus: Ce livre sans nom, par un autre sans nom.

The Book of Poruḷ, in full Poruṭpāl, also known as the Book of Wealth, Book of Polity, the Second Book or Book Two in translated versions, is the second of the three books or parts of the Kural literature, authored by the ancient Indian philosopher Valluvar. Written in High Tamil distich form, it has 70 chapters each containing 10 kurals or couplets, making a total of 700 couplets all dealing with statecraft. Poruḷ, which means both 'wealth' and 'meaning', correlates with the second of the four ancient Indian values of dharma, artha, kama and moksha. The Book of Poruḷ deals with polity, or virtues of an individual with respect to the surroundings, including the stately qualities of administration, wisdom, prudence, nobility, diplomacy, citizenship, geniality, industry, chastity, sobriety and teetotalism, that is expected of every individual, keeping aṟam or dharma as the base.

The Book of Inbam, in full Iṉbattuppāl, or in a more sanskritized term Kāmattuppāl, also known as the Book of Love, the Third Book or Book Three in translated versions, is the third of the three books or parts of the Kural literature, authored by the ancient Indian philosopher Valluvar. Written in High Tamil distich form, it has 25 chapters each containing 10 kurals or couplets, making a total of 250 couplets all dealing with human love. The term inbam or kamam, which means 'pleasure', correlates with the third of the four ancient Indian values of dharma, artha, kama and moksha. However, unlike Kamasutra, which deals with different methods of lovemaking, the Book of Inbam expounds the virtues and emotions involved in conjugal love between a man and a woman, or virtues of an individual within the walls of intimacy, keeping aṟam or dharma as the base.

Mamulanar was a poet of the Sangam period, to whom 31 verses of the Sangam literature have been attributed, including verse 8 of the Tiruvalluva Maalai.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vasuki (wife of Valluvar)</span>

Vasuki was a Tamil woman who lived around the late or post Sangam era. She was the wife of the Tamil poet-philosopher Valluvar. She is traditionally considered a faithful wife and a model of Tamil womanhood.

Vannakkan Sāthanār was a poet of the Sangam period to whom verse 43 of the Tiruvalluva Maalai.

Elelasingan, also known as Elelasingan Chettiyar, Elela and Alara, was a Tamil merchant who lived in Mylapore, by the shores of the Pallava Kingdom, trading between India and Ceylon. He is best known as the contemporary, friend, and disciple of the celebrated Tamil poet and philosopher Valluvar.

Tirutthanigai Saravanaperumal Aiyar was a Tamil scholar, best known for his commentary on the Tirukkural and other Tamil classics.

Commentaries to literary works remain one of the most important and telling aspects of the Tamil literary tradition. Commentaries to ancient Tamil works have been written since the medieval period and continue to be written in the modern era. Many ancient Tamil works continue to remain in comprehension chiefly due to exegesis or commentaries written on them. The most famous examples of such works are the Tolkappiyam and the Tirukkural, with the latter remaining the most reviewed work in the Tamil literature.

References

Blackburn, Stuart (2000). "Corruption and Redemption: The Legend of Valluvar and Tamil Literary History". Modern Asian Studies. 34 (2): 449–482. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00003632. S2CID 144101632. Archived from the original on 3 October 2008. Retrieved 20 August 2007.
Iraikkuruvanar (2009). திருக்குறளின் தனிச்சிறப்புக்கள் [Tirukkural Specialities]. Chennai: Iraiyagam.
S. Arasaratnam (Ed. and Trans.) (1978). François Valentijn's Description of Ceylon (Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indien, 1726) (395 pages). Hakluyt Society, Second Series (Book 149). London: The Hakluyt Society. ISBN 978-0-904180-06-0.
A. Arumugam (2014). வள்ளுவம் [Valluvam]. Philosophy Textbooks Series. Chennai: Periyar E.V.Ramasamy-Nagammai Education and Research Trust.
Tarlochan Singh Bedi (2012). Tirukkural in Punjabi. Chennai: Central Institute of Classical Tamil. ISBN 978-93-81744-02-4.
C. Dandapani Desikar (1969). திருக்குறள் அழகும் அமைப்பும் [Tirukkural: Beauty and Structure]. Chennai: Tamil Valarchi Iyakkagam.
M. G. Kovaimani and P. V. Nagarajan (2013). திருக்குறள் ஆய்வுமாலை [Tirukkural Research Papers] (in Tamil) (1 ed.). Tanjavur: Tamil University. ISBN 978-81-7090-435-9.
A. A. Manavalan (2009). Essays and Tributes on Tirukkural (1886–1986 AD) (1 ed.). Chennai: International Institute of Tamil Studies.
Albert Schweitzer (2013). Indian Thoughts and Its Development. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Read Books. pp. 200–205. ISBN 978-14-7338-900-7.
G. U. Pope (1886). The Sacred Kurral of Tiruvalluva Nayanar (First ed.). New Delhi: Asian Educational Services. ISBN 8120600223.
M. Rajamanickam (1963). தமிழ் மொழி இலக்கிய வரலாறு [History of Tamil Language and Literature] (1 ed.). Chennai.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
M. P. Sivagnanam (1974). திருக்குறளிலே கலைபற்றிக் கூறாததேன்? [Why the Kural did not mention art?]. Chennai: Poonkodi Padhippagam.
I. Sundaramurthi (2000). குறளமுதம் [Kuralamudham]. Chennai: Tamil Valarcchi Iyakkagam.
Thamizhannal (2004). உலகத் தமிழிலக்கிய வரலாறு [History of World Tamil Literature] (1 ed.). Chennai: International Institute of Tamil Studies.
K. S. Anandan (2018). திருக்குறளின் உண்மைப் பொருள் [The true meaning of the Tirukkural] (2 ed.). Coimbatore: Thangam Padhippagam.
Kamil Zvelebil (1973). The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India. Leiden: E. J. Brill. ISBN 90-04-03591-5 . Retrieved 7 March 2018.
Kamil Zvelebil (1975). Tamil Literature. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Leiden: E. J. Brill. ISBN 90-04-04190-7 . Retrieved 7 March 2018.
"Thiruvalluvar Day 2020: History, significance and all you need to know about the iconic poet". Hindustan Times. HindustanTimes.com. 16 January 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
Thiruvalluvar Ninaivu Malar. 1935. p. 117.
Kathir Mahadevan (1985). Oppilakkiya Nokkil Sanga Kaalam [Sangam Period from a Comparative Study Perspective] (Third ed.). Chennai: Macmillan India Limited.
S. Maharajan (2017). Tiruvalluvar. Makers of Indian Literature (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi. ISBN 978-81-260-5321-6.