Proto-South Dravidian language

Last updated
Proto-South Dravidian
Proto-South Dravidian I
Reconstruction of South Dravidian languages
RegionPrimarily South India, possibly also areas of North India during Bronze Age.
Eraca. 2nd-1st m. BCE [1]
Reconstructed
ancestor

Proto-South Dravidian is the linguistic reconstruction of the common ancestor of the southern Dravidian languages native to southern India. [2] [3] Its descendants include Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, Tulu, Badaga, Kodava, Irula, Kota and Toda. South Dravidian is sometimes referred to as South Dravidian I by linguists. [4]

Contents

History

Going by attested changes in written documents, the Proto-South Dravidian I (PSD1) language has been hypothesised to have been present in the second half of the first millennium BC. [4] Some linguists infer it to have split from Proto-South Dravidian II (Also known as South Central Dravidian or Telugu-Kui) at the beginning of the first millennium BC. [4] These datings however, have been noted to be vague approximations. [4]

Phonology

Vowels

Proto-South Dravidian inherited the system of five short and long vowels from Proto-Dravidian: *a, , *i, , *u, , *e, , *o, . [5]

Consonants

Old Tamil, the earliest attested branch of South Dravidian has preserved an inventory of 17 consonants very similar to Proto-Dravidian: /p t ṯ c ṭ k, m n ñ ṇ, r ẓ, l ḷ, y w *H/. [6]

Shared innovations

In Proto-South Dravidian I, there is a merger of Proto-Dravidian high vowels *i*u with *e*o in the environment [C-a]. There is also a loss of *c following two intermediate stages of s and h in initial and medial positions. This sporadic loss of *c is also shared with the neighboring Telugu language, which suggests that the change occurred when the SD1 subgroup neighbored the ancestor of Telugu right from the beginning. Proto-Dravidian *ṯ also becomes *ṟ in intervocalic position in PSD1. [7] [8]

PSD1 also innovated separate demonstrative pronouns for females with a feminine suffix *-aḷ (< āḷ woman): *avaḷ (distal) *ivaḷ (proximal), *uvaḷ (intermediary). [9]

Society

The vocabulary of PSD indicates that the society was much more developed than at the Proto-Dravidian stage, although not all reconstructed words are from a single chronological stage. There are several new words for headman, rulers (including an Indo-Aryan loan word), taxes, armies, territorial divisions, tolls and customs, debt collection and corvée labor. [10] [11]

There are also terms for urban structures and various types of habitations including villages, towns, castles, forts, prisons (or storehouses), palaces and streets. The caste system is well established with several names of occupations which later became caste terms. There are also many terms for metal objects such as weapons, ships, vehicles with wheels, clothes, and valuable stones. There are new developments in agriculture with new crops and irrigation techniques. This more advanced lifestyle has yet to be identified in the archaeological record of peninsular India in the timeframe of Proto-South Dravidian. [11]

Shared words with Akkadian

South Dravidian (SD1) *eḷḷu (sesame) is cognate with Akkadian ellu which suggests that the name was in use at the time of trade between the Indus Valley Civilisation and Mesopotamia (circa 2600-1900 BC). The Akkadian word for ivory (pīru) is also said to be of Dravidian origin (*pīlu) and cognate with Brahui *pīl. [12] [13] These words reinforce the hypothesis that Dravidian speakers were present in the Indus Valley Civilisation. [14]

Old Indo-Aryan loans in Proto-South Dravidian

The following Old Indo-Aryan loan words into Proto-South Dravidian have been proposed by linguist Franklin Southworth. The word *accu (axle) was hypothesised to have been loaned into Proto-Dravidian from Rig Vedic akṣa. [15]

Proto-South Dravidian reconstructionMeaningOld Indo-Aryan
*arankstage, platform, verandaranga
*arac-ankingrājan
*argaḷbar, cross barargala
*āṇinailāṇi
*kañcbell metalkamśa
*kaṭṭstickkāṣṭha
*kump-atgourd, pumpkinkumbha-phala, kumbhanda
*paṇ-icombphaṇaga, (Marathi phaṇi)
*paṇṭicart, wagonbhāṇḍa
*pōymember of a spec. tribe/caste, headmanbhōgin
*may-aṇwaxmadana, mayana, (Marathi men)

Other early borrowings in the Vedic period

The following words are attested in both Proto-South Dravidian and Rig Vedic Sanskrit (circa 1400 BC), with uncertainty of which direction the borrowing was from. The Rig Vedic ulukhala (mortar) is proposed to be cognate with PSD *ul-akk ‘pestle’, while Rig Vedic nīla (blue) is proposed to be cognate with PSD *aṇile (ink nut tree). [15]

Other words in the Shatapatha Brahmana (circa 700 BC) include arka (the plant Calatropis gigantea) cognate with PSD *erukku and muñja (‘the grass Saccharum Sara) cognate with PSD *muñci. [15]

Substratum effect on Indo-Aryan

Ferenc Ruzca states that all the major shifts in Indo-Aryan phonetics over two millennia can be attributed to the constant influence of an old Dravidian language with a similar phonetic structure to Tamil. [16]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brahui language</span> Dravidian language spoken in West and Central Asia

Brahui is a Dravidian language spoken by the Brahui people who are mainly found in the central Balochistan Province of Pakistan, with smaller communities of speakers scattered in parts of Iranian Baluchestan, Afghanistan, and Turkmenistan and by expatriate Brahui communities in Iraq, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. It is isolated from the nearest Dravidian-speaking neighbouring population of South India by a distance of more than 1,500 kilometres (930 mi). The Kalat, Khuzdar, Mastung, Quetta, Bolan, Nasirabad, Nushki, and Kharan districts of Balochistan Province are predominantly Brahui-speaking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dravidian languages</span> Language family mostly of southern India

The Dravidian languages are a family of languages spoken by 250 million people, mainly in South India, north-east Sri Lanka, and south-west Pakistan, with pockets elsewhere in South Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elamo-Dravidian languages</span> Proposed language family

The Elamo-Dravidian language family is a hypothesised language family that links the Elamite language of ancient Elam to the Dravidian languages of South Asia. The latest version (2015) of the hypothesis entails a reclassification of Brahui as being more closely related to Elamite than to the remaining Dravidian languages. Linguist David McAlpin has been a chief proponent of the Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis, followed by Franklin Southworth as the other major supporter. The hypothesis has gained attention in academic circles, but has been subject to serious criticism by linguists, and remains only one of several possible scenarios for the origins of the Dravidian languages. Elamite is generally accepted by scholars to be a language isolate, unrelated to any other known language.

Mleccha is a Sanskrit term referring to those of an incomprehensible speech, foreigners or invaders deemed distinct and separate from the Vedic tribes. In Vedic literature, the term is used to refer to 'non-Aryans' : foreigners who did not speak Indo-Aryan languages and those considered culturally or linguistically distinct from the Vedic or Aryan people and outside the religious and cultural sphere of Vedic dharma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indo-Iranians</span> Historical group of Indo-European peoples

The Indo-Iranian peoples, also known as Ā́rya or Aryans from their self-designation, were a group of Indo-European speaking peoples who brought the Indo-Iranian languages to major parts of Eurasia in waves from the first part of the 2nd millennium BC onwards. They eventually branched out into the Iranian peoples and Indo-Aryan peoples.

Jim G. Shaffer is an American archaeologist and professor of anthropology at Case Western Reserve University.

Proto-Dravidian is the linguistic reconstruction of the common ancestor of the Dravidian languages native to the Indian subcontinent. It is thought to have differentiated into Proto-North Dravidian, Proto-Central Dravidian, and Proto-South Dravidian, although the date of diversification is still debated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asko Parpola</span> Finnish Indologist (born 1941)

Asko Heikki Siegfried Parpola is a Finnish Indologist, current professor emeritus of Indology at the University of Helsinki. He specializes in the Indus Valley Civilization, specifically the study of the Indus script.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linguistic history of India</span>

Since the Iron Age in India, the native languages of the Indian subcontinent are divided into various language families, of which the Indo-Aryan and the Dravidian are the most widely spoken. There are also many languages belonging to unrelated language families such as Munda and Tibeto-Burman, spoken by smaller groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Dravidian languages</span> Branch of the Dravidian language family

The Northern Dravidian languages are a branch of the Dravidian languages that includes Brahui, Kurukh and Malto.. It is further divided into Kurukh–Malto and Brahui.

Vedic Sanskrit has a number of linguistic features which are alien to most other Indo-European languages. Prominent examples include: phonologically, the introduction of retroflexes, which alternate with dentals, and morphologically, the formation of gerunds. Some philologists attribute such features, as well as the presence of non-Indo-European vocabulary, to a local substratum of languages encountered by Indo-Aryan peoples in Central Asia (Bactria-Marghiana) and within the Indian subcontinent during Indo-Aryan migrations, including the Dravidian languages.

Indigenous Aryanism, also known as the Indigenous Aryans theory (IAT) and the Out of India theory (OIT), is the conviction that the Aryans are indigenous to the Indian subcontinent, and that the Indo-European languages radiated out from a homeland in India into their present locations. It is a "religio-nationalistic" view on Indian history, and propagated as an alternative to the established migration model, which considers the Pontic–Caspian steppe to be the area of origin of the Indo-European languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dravidian peoples</span> South Asian ethnolinguistic group

The Dravidian peoples, Dravidian-speakers or Dravidians, are a collection of ethnolinguistic groups native to South Asia who speak Dravidian languages. There are around 250 million native speakers of Dravidian languages. Dravidian speakers form the majority of the population of South India and are natively found in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, the Maldives, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Dravidian peoples are also present in Singapore, Mauritius, Malaysia, France, South Africa, Myanmar, East Africa, the Caribbean, and the United Arab Emirates through recent migration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harappan language</span> Language of the Bronze Age civilization of the Indus Valley

The Harappan language is the unknown language or languages of the Bronze Age Harappan civilization. The Harappan script is yet undeciphered, indeed it has not even been demonstrated to be a writing system, and therefore the language remains unknown. The language being yet unattested in readable contemporary sources, hypotheses regarding its nature are based on possible loanwords, the substratum in Vedic Sanskrit, and some terms recorded in Sumerian cuneiform, in conjunction with analyses of the Harappan script.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Tamil</span> Form of Tamil used from 300 BCE to 700 CE

Old Tamil is the period of the Tamil language spanning from the third century BCE to the seventh century CE. Prior to Old Tamil, the period of Tamil linguistic development is termed as Proto-Tamil. After the Old Tamil period, Tamil becomes Middle Tamil. The earliest records in Old Tamil are inscriptions from between the 3rd and 1st century BCE in caves and on pottery. These inscriptions are written in a variant of the Brahmi script called Tamil-Brahmi. The earliest long text in Old Tamil is the Tolkāppiyam, an early work on Tamil grammar and poetics, whose oldest layers could be as old as the mid-2nd century BCE. Old Tamil preserved many features of Proto-Dravidian, the reconstructed common ancestor of the Dravidian languages, including inventory of consonants, the syllable structure, and various grammatical features.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dravidian folk religion</span> Indigenous Dravidian folk religion

The early Dravidian religion constituted a non-Vedic, pre-Indo-Aryan, indigenous religion practiced by Dravidian peoples in the Indian subcontinent that they were either historically or are at present Āgamic. The Agamas are non-Vedic in origin, and have been dated either as post-Vedic texts, or as pre-Vedic compositions. The Agamas are a collection of Tamil and Sanskrit scriptures chiefly constituting the methods of temple construction and creation of murti, worship means of deities, philosophical doctrines, meditative practices, attainment of sixfold desires and four kinds of yoga. The worship of tutelary deities and sacred flora and fauna in Hinduism is also recognized as a survival of the pre-Vedic Dravidian religion. Dravidian linguistic influence on early Vedic religion is evident; many of these features are already present in the oldest known Indo-Aryan language, the language of the Rigveda, which also includes over a dozen words borrowed from Dravidian. The linguistic evidence for Dravidian impact grows increasingly strong as one moves from the Samhitas down through the later Vedic works and into the classical post-Vedic literature. This represents an early religious and cultural fusion or synthesis between ancient Dravidians and Indo-Aryans that went on to influence Indian civilisation.

Franklin C. Southworth is an American linguist and Professor Emeritus of South Asian linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania.

Malaysian Tamil, also known as Malaya Tamil, is a local variant of the Tamil language spoken in Malaysia. It is one of the languages of education in Malaysia, along with English, Malay and Mandarin. There are many differences in vocabulary between Malaysian Tamil and Indian Tamil.

Tamil loanwords entered the Greek language through the interactions of Mediterranean and South Indian merchants during different periods in history. Most words had to do with items of trade that were unique to South India. There is a general consensus about Tamil loanwords in Ancient Greek, while a few of the words have competing etymologies.

The Inner–Outer hypothesis of the subclassification of the Indo-Aryan language family argues for a division of the family into two groups, an Inner core and an Outer periphery, evidenced by shared traits of the languages falling into one of the two groups. Proponents of the theory generally believe the distinction to be the result of gradual migrations of Indo-Aryan speakers into the Indian subcontinent, with the inner languages representing a second wave of migration speaking a different dialect of Old Indo-Aryan, overtaking the first-wave speakers in the center and relegating them to the outer region.

References

  1. Southworth, Franklin (2004), Linguistic archaeology of South Asia, Routledge, p. 195, ISBN   9780415655446.
  2. Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju (2003). The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-139-43533-8.
  3. Andronov, Mikhail Sergeevich (2003), A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian Languages, Otto Harrassowitz, p. 299, ISBN   978-3-447-04455-4.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Southworth, Franklin (2004), Linguistic archaeology of South Asia, Routledge, p. 50-51, ISBN   9780415655446.
  5. Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju (2003). The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-139-43533-8. p.79
  6. Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju (2003). The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-139-43533-8. p.53
  7. Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju (2003). The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-139-43533-8. pp.173-174
  8. Subrahmanyam, P.S. (2008). Dravidian Comparative Grammar 1. Central Institute of Classical Tamil. pp.39-40
  9. Subrahmanyam, P.S. (2008). Dravidian Comparative Grammar 1. Central Institute of Classical Tamil. pp.39-40
  10. Southworth, Franklin (2004), Linguistic archaeology of South Asia, Routledge, p. 240-242, ISBN   9780415655446
  11. 1 2 Southworth, Franklin (2004), Linguistic archaeology of South Asia, Routledge, p. 250-256, ISBN   9780415655446
  12. Ansumali Mukhopadhyay, Bahata (2021-08-03). "Ancestral Dravidian languages in Indus Civilization: ultraconserved Dravidian tooth-word reveals deep linguistic ancestry and supports genetics". Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 8 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00868-w . ISSN   2662-9992. S2CID   257091003.
  13. Bray, Denys (1978). The Brahui language. Quetta: Brahui academy. p. 236.
  14. Southworth, Franklin (2004), Linguistic archaeology of South Asia, Routledge, p. 332, ISBN   9780415655446
  15. 1 2 3 Southworth, Franklin (2004), Linguistic archaeology of South Asia, Routledge, p. 79-82, ISBN   9780415655446
  16. Ruzca, Ferenc (2013). "The influence of Dravidian on Indo-Aryan phonetics". In Klein, Jared S. (ed.). Indic Across the Millennia: from the Rigveda to Modern Indo-Aryans. Hempen Verlag. pp. 145–152. ISBN   9783934106055.