Proto-Dravidian language

Last updated
Proto-Dravidian
Reconstruction of Dravidian languages
RegionPeninsular India, Deccan Plateau
Erac. 4th–3rd m. BCE
Lower-order reconstructions

Proto-Dravidian is the linguistic reconstruction of the common ancestor of the Dravidian languages native to the Indian subcontinent. [1] It is thought to have differentiated into Proto-North Dravidian, Proto-Central Dravidian, and Proto-South Dravidian, although the date of diversification is still debated. [2]

Contents

History

As a proto-language, Proto-Dravidian is not itself attested in historical records. Its modern conception is based solely on reconstruction. It is suggested that the language was spoken in the 4th millennium BCE, and started evolving into various branches around 3rd-millennium BCE. [3] [ full citation needed ]

The origin and territory of the Proto-Dravidian speakers is uncertain, but some suggestions have been made based on the reconstructed Proto-Dravidian vocabulary. The reconstruction has been done on the basis of cognate words present in the different branches (Northern, Central and Southern) of the Dravidian language family. [4]

According to Fuller (2007), the botanical vocabulary of Proto-Dravidian is characteristic of the dry deciduous forests of central and peninsular India. For the Southern Dravidians, this region extends from Saurashtra and Central India to South India. It thus represents the general area in which the Dravidians were living before the separation of branches. [4]

According to Franklin Southworth (2005), [5] the Proto-Dravidian vocabulary is characteristic of a rural economy based on agriculture, animal husbandry and hunting. However, there are some indications of a society more complex than a rural one: [6]

This evidence is not sufficient to determine with certainty the territory of the Proto-Dravidians. These characteristics can be accommodated within multiple contemporary cultures, including: [6]

Phonology

Vowels

Proto-Dravidian contrasted between five short and long vowels: *a, , *i, , *u, , *e, , *o, . The sequences *ai and *au are treated as *ay and *av (or *aw). [10]

Consonants

Proto-Dravidian has been reconstructed as having the following consonant phonemes: [11] [12] [13]

Labial Dental Alveolar Retroflex Palatal Velar Glottal
Nasals *m*n(*ṉ) [a] *ṇ
Plosive *p*t*ṯ*ṭ*c*k
Semivowel *w*y*H
Rhotic *r [b]
Lateral *l*ḷ
  1. reconstructed by P. S. Subrahmanyam
  2. may also be represented as ḻ or r̤

The singular alveolar plosive *ṯ developed into an alveolar trill /r/ in many of the South and South Central languages, it later merged with the tap in many of them; Tulu has /d͡ʒ, d̪, ɾ/ as reflexes, Manda-Kui made it /d͡ʒ/ and Hill-Maria Gondi made it /ʁ/. *ṯṯ and *nṯ became /r̥, nr/ in Konda and [tr, ndr] in many Tamil dialects. Apart from them, other languages did not rhotacize it, instead either preserving them or merging it with other sets of stops like dentals in Kannada, retroflexes in Telugu or palatals in Manda-Kui and some languages of Kerala. [14] Central made all alveolars dental which is one of the features distinguishing it from South Central branch and North made it /r, s/. [13] [15] For example, Tamil āṟu, Tulu āji, Naiki sādi, Kui hāja; Tamil puṟṟu, Tulu puñca, Kannada huttu, Naiki puṭṭa, Konda puRi, Malto pute; Tamil onṟu, Tulu oñji, Pengo ronje, Brahui asi.

Velar nasal *ṅ occurred only before *k in Proto-Dravidian (as in many of its daughter languages). Therefore, it is not considered a separate phoneme in Proto-Dravidian. However, it attained phonemic status in languages like Malayalam, Gondi, Konda and Pengo because the original sequence *ṅk was simplified to *ṅ or *ṅṅ. [16]

The glottal fricative *H has been proposed by Krishnamurti (2003) to account for the Old Tamil Aytam (Āytam) and other Dravidian comparative phonological phenomena.

P. S. Subrahmanyam reconstructs 6 nasals for PD compared to 4 by Krishnamurti, who also does not reconstruct a laryngeal. [17]

The Northern Dravidian languages Kurukh, Malto and Brahui cannot easily be derived from the traditional Proto-Dravidian phonological system. McAlpin (2003) proposes that they branched off from an earlier stage of Proto-Dravidian than the conventional reconstruction, which would apply only to the other languages. He suggests reconstructing a richer system of dorsal stop consonants:

Early Proto-DravidianLate Proto-Dravidian
(Proto-Non-North Dravidian)
Proto-Kurukh-MaltoBrahui
*c*c*c
*kʲ*c*kk
*k*k*kk
*q*k*qx
k / _i(ː)

Numerals

Vocabulary

Crop plants

Below are some crop plants that have been found in the Southern Neolithic complex of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, along with their Proto-Dravidian or Proto-South Dravidian reconstructions by Southworth (2005). In some cases, the proto-form glosses differ from the species identified from archaeological sites. For example, the two Southern Neolithic staple grasses Brachiaria ramosa and Setaria verticillata respectively correspond to the reconstructed Proto-Dravidian forms for Sorghum vulgare and Setaria italica as early Dravidian speakers shifted to millet species that were later introduced to South India. [5]

Pulses
Common nameScientific nameReconstruction levelProto-formGloss of proto-form
horsegram Macrotyloma uniflorum Late Proto-Dravidian*koḷ horsegram
green gram Vigna radiata Late Proto-Dravidian*pac-Vt/Vl green gram
black gram Vigna cf. mungo; Vigna trilobata Late Proto-Dravidian*uẓ-untu, *min(t) black gram
hyacinth bean Lablab purpureus Proto-Tamil*ava-rai Dolichos lablab
pigeonpea Cajanus cajan Late Proto-Dravidian*tu-var pigeonpea
Millets and related grasses
Common nameScientific nameReconstruction levelProto-formGloss of proto-form
browntop millet Brachiaria ramosa Late Proto-Dravidian*conna-l sorghum
bristly foxtail Setaria verticillata Late Proto-Dravidian*kot-V Setaria italica
sawa millet Echinochloa cf. colona
yellow foxtail Setaria pumila
little millet Panicum sumatrense
kodo millet Paspalum scrobiculatum Proto-South Dravidian*(v)ār/ar-Vk pearl millet
millet Pennisetum glaucum Proto-South Dravidian*kam-pu bulrush millet
finger millet Eleusine coracana Proto-South Dravidian*ira(k) ragi
Large cereals
Common nameScientific nameReconstruction levelProto-formGloss of proto-form
barley Hordeum vulgare
wheat Triticum Late Proto-Dravidian?*kūli wheat
rice Oryza sp.Late Proto-Dravidian?*(v)ar-iñci rice
Other food/crop plants
Common nameScientific nameReconstruction levelProto-formGloss of proto-form
jujube Zizyphus sp.Late Proto-Dravidian*irak- jujube
fig Ficus sp.Late Proto-Dravidian*cuv- fig
java plum cf. Syzygium cumini Late Proto-Dravidian*ñēr-al jambu
globe cucumber Cucumis cf. prophetarum
luffa cf. Luffa cylindrica Late Proto-Dravidian*pīr
flax Linum usitatissimum Proto-South Dravidian*ak-V-ce
cotton Gossypium sp.Proto-South Dravidian*par-utti
okra Abelmoschus sp.
parenchyma fragmentsEarly Proto-Dravidian*kic-ampu
date palm Phoenix sp.Early Proto-Dravidian*cīntu
Not identified archaeologically in the Southern Neolithic
Common nameScientific nameReconstruction levelProto-formGloss of proto-form
onion/garlic Allium sp.Early Proto-Dravidian*uḷḷi
eggplant Solanum sp.Early Proto-Dravidian*vaẓ-Vt
sesame Sesamum indicum Late Proto-Dravidian*nū(v)- sesame
sugarcane Saccharum sp.Early Proto-Dravidian*cet-Vkk
hemp Cannabis sp.Late Proto-Dravidian ?*boy-Vl

Basic vocabulary

Basic vocabulary of Proto-Dravidian selected from Krishnamurti (2003): [18]

glossProto-Dravidian
one*on-ṯu
one (adj.)*ōr-/*or-V-
two*īr/*ir-V
three (adj.)*muH-/*mū-
four (adj.)*nāl/*nal-V-
five (adj.)*cay-m-
six (adj.)*caṯ-V
seven (adj.)*eẓ-V
eight (adj.)*eṇ
nine, 9/10*toḷ-/*toṇ-
ten minus one*on-patV
ten (adj.)*paH-
head, hair, top*tal-ay
cheek*kap-Vḷ
eye*kaṇ
eyeball*kuṭ-V/*kuṇṭ-V
ear*kew-i
nose, beak*mū-nk(k)u/-nc-
tooth*pal
mouth [a] *wāy
hand, arm*kay
leg, foot*kāl
heart, kidney*kuṇṭV
liver*taẓ-Vnk-/-nkk
milk, breast*pāl
bone*el-V-mp/-nk
bone marrow*mūḷ-V-
excrement*piy/*pī
house*il
husband*maẓc-a-
man, husband*māy-tt-/*mā-cc-
woman*peṇ
name*pin-cc-Vr
sky*wān-am
sun*en-ṯ-
sun*pōẓ/*poẓ-u-tu
moon, moonlight*nel-a-nc/-ncc
month*nel-V-
star*cukk-V
star*miHn
cloud*muy-il
water*nīr
river, stream*yĀtu
lake*kuḷ-am/-Vnc-
sea, ocean*kaṭ-al
stone*kal
wind*waḷi
day*nāḷ
night*nāḷ/*naḷ-V-
year*yAṇṭ-u
tree*mar-am/-an
fruit, pod*kāy
forest*kā(-n), kā-ṭu
grass*pul
thatched grass*pīr
dog*naH-ay/-att/-kuẓi
animal, beast, deer*mā
deer*kur-V-c-
tiger*pul-i
rat*el-i
snake*pāmpu
meat*iṯ-ay-cci
meat*ū/*uy
oil, ghee*ney
fish*mīn
louse*pēn
mosquito*nuẓ-Vḷ/-nk-
wing*ceṯ-ank-/-ankk-
black*cir-
white*weḷ/*weṇ
red*kem
sweet (adj./n.)*in-
sour*puḷ-
bitter; bitterness*kac (> kay)
to eat, drink*uHṇ-/*ūṇ-
to eat*tiHn-
to come*waH-/*waH-r
to walk*naṭ-a
to give*ciy-/*cī-
to die*caH- ~ *ceH-
to sleep*kū-r-
to sleep*tuñc-
to count*eṇ
  1. Also 'edge, beak, mouth of vessel, aperture, blade of sword'.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dravidian languages</span> Language family mostly of southern India

The Dravidian languages are a family of languages spoken by 250 million people, mainly in South India, north-east Sri Lanka, and south-west Pakistan, with pockets elsewhere in South Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tamil language</span> Dravidian language native to South India and Sri Lanka

Tamil is a Dravidian language natively spoken by the Tamil people of South Asia. It is one of the two longest-surviving classical languages in India, along with Sanskrit, attested since c. 300 BCE. The language belongs to the southern branch of the Dravidian language family and shares close ties with Malayalam and Kannada. Despite external influences, Tamil has retained a sense of linguistic purism, especially in formal and literary contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telugu language</span> Language native to South India

Telugu is a classical Dravidian language native to the Indian states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, where it is also the official language. Spoken by about 96 million people (2022), Telugu is the most widely spoken member of the Dravidian language family, and one of the twenty-two scheduled languages of the Republic of India. It is one of the few languages that has primary official status in more than one Indian state, alongside Hindi and Bengali. Telugu is one of the languages designated as a classical language by the Government of India. It is the 14th most spoken native language in the world. Modern Standard Telugu is based on the dialect of erstwhile Krishna, Guntur, East Godavari and West Godavari districts of Coastal Andhra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elamo-Dravidian languages</span> Proposed language family

The Elamo-Dravidian language family is a hypothesised language family that links the Elamite language of ancient Elam to the Dravidian languages of South Asia. The latest version (2015) of the hypothesis entails a reclassification of Brahui as being more closely related to Elamite than to the remaining Dravidian languages. Linguist David McAlpin has been a chief proponent of the Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis, followed by Franklin Southworth as the other major supporter. The hypothesis has gained attention in academic circles, but has been subject to serious criticism by linguists, and remains only one of several possible scenarios for the origins of the Dravidian languages. Elamite is generally accepted by scholars to be a language isolate, unrelated to any other known language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meluhha</span> Prominent trading partner of Sumer during the Middle Bronze Age

Meluḫḫa or Melukhkha is the Sumerian name of a prominent trading partner of Sumer during the Middle Bronze Age. Its identification remains an open question, but most scholars associate it with the Indus Valley Civilisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indus script</span> Symbols of the Indus Valley Civilisation

The Indus script, also known as the Harappan script and the Indus Valley Script, is a corpus of symbols produced by the Indus Valley Civilisation. Most inscriptions containing these symbols are extremely short, making it difficult to judge whether or not they constituted a writing system used to record a Harappan language, any of which are yet to be identified. Despite many attempts, the "script" has not yet been deciphered. There is no known bilingual inscription to help decipher the script, which shows no significant changes over time. However, some of the syntax varies depending upon location.

South Dravidian is one of the four major branches of the Dravidian languages family. It includes the literary languages Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam and Tulu, as well as several non-literary languages such as Badaga, Irula, Kota, Kurumba, Toda and Kodava.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asko Parpola</span> Finnish Indologist (born 1941)

Asko Heikki Siegfried Parpola is a Finnish Indologist, current professor emeritus of Indology at the University of Helsinki. He specializes in the Indus Valley Civilization, specifically the study of the Indus script.

Irula is a Dravidian language spoken by the Irulas who inhabit the area of the Nilgiri mountains, in the states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka, India. It is closely related to Tamil. It is written in the Tamil script.

Paleolinguistics is a term used by some linguists for the study of the distant human past by linguistic means. For most historical linguists there is no separate field of paleolinguistics. Those who use the term are generally advocates of hypotheses not generally accepted by mainstream historical linguists, a group colloquially referred to as "long-rangers".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linguistic history of India</span>

Since the Iron Age in India, the native languages of the Indian subcontinent are divided into various language families, of which the Indo-Aryan and the Dravidian are the most widely spoken. There are also many languages belonging to unrelated language families such as Munda and Tibeto-Burman, spoken by smaller groups.

Vedic Sanskrit has a number of linguistic features which are alien to most other Indo-European languages. Prominent examples include: phonologically, the introduction of retroflexes, which alternate with dentals, and morphologically, the formation of gerunds. Some philologists attribute such features, as well as the presence of non-Indo-European vocabulary, to a local substratum of languages encountered by Indo-Aryan peoples in Central Asia (Bactria-Marghiana) and within the Indian subcontinent during Indo-Aryan migrations, including the Dravidian languages.

Tamil phonology is characterised by the presence of "true-subapical" retroflex consonants and multiple rhotic consonants. Its script does not distinguish between voiced and unvoiced consonants; phonetically, voice is assigned depending on a consonant's position in a word, voiced intervocalically and after nasals except when geminated. Tamil phonology permits few consonant clusters, which can never be word initial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dravidian peoples</span> South Asian ethnolinguistic group

The Dravidian peoples, Dravidian-speakers or Dravidians, are a collection of ethnolinguistic groups native to South Asia who speak Dravidian languages. There are around 250 million native speakers of Dravidian languages. Dravidian speakers form the majority of the population of South India and are natively found in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, the Maldives, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Dravidian peoples are also present in Singapore, Mauritius, Malaysia, France, South Africa, Myanmar, East Africa, the Caribbean, and the United Arab Emirates through recent migration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harappan language</span> Language of the Bronze Age civilization of the Indus Valley

The Harappan language is the unknown language or languages of the Bronze Age Harappan civilization. The Harappan script is yet undeciphered, indeed it has not even been demonstrated to be a writing system, and therefore the language remains unknown. The language being yet unattested in readable contemporary sources, hypotheses regarding its nature are based on possible loanwords, the substratum in Vedic Sanskrit, and some terms recorded in Sumerian cuneiform, in conjunction with analyses of the Harappan script.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voiceless alveolar trill</span> Consonantal sound represented by ⟨r̥⟩ in IPA

The voiceless alveolar trill differs from the voiced alveolar trill only by the vibrations of the vocal cord. It occurs in a few languages, usually alongside the voiced version, as a similar phoneme or an allophone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Tamil</span> Form of Tamil used from 300 BCE to 700 CE

Old Tamil is the period of the Tamil language spanning from the third century BCE to the seventh century CE. Prior to Old Tamil, the period of Tamil linguistic development is termed as Proto-Tamil. After the Old Tamil period, Tamil becomes Middle Tamil. The earliest records in Old Tamil are inscriptions from between the 3rd and 1st century BCE in caves and on pottery. These inscriptions are written in a variant of the Brahmi script called Tamil-Brahmi. The earliest long text in Old Tamil is the Tolkāppiyam, an early work on Tamil grammar and poetics, whose oldest layers could be as old as the mid-2nd century BCE. Old Tamil preserved many features of Proto-Dravidian, the reconstructed common ancestor of the Dravidian languages, including inventory of consonants, the syllable structure, and various grammatical features.

Konda-Dora, also known simply as Konda or Kubi, is a Dravidian language spoken in India. It is spoken by the scheduled tribe of the Konda-Dora, who mostly live in the districts of Vizianagaram, Srikakulam, and East Godavari in Andhra Pradesh, and the Koraput district in Odisha.

Franklin C. Southworth is an American linguist and Professor Emeritus of South Asian linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania.

Proto-South Dravidian is the linguistic reconstruction of the common ancestor of the southern Dravidian languages native to southern India. Its descendants include Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, Tulu, Badaga, Kodava, Irula, Kota and Toda. South Dravidian is sometimes referred to as South Dravidian I by linguists.

References

  1. Andronov 2003, p. 299.
  2. Krishnamurti 2003, p. 492.
  3. History and Archaeology. vol. 1, no. 1–2. Department of Ancient History, Culture, and Archaeology, University of Allahabad. 1980. p. 234. OCLC   11579254.
  4. 1 2 McIntosh 2008, p. 353.
  5. 1 2 Southworth 2005.
  6. 1 2 McIntosh 2008, p. 353–354.
  7. Parpola & Parpola 1975, p. 217–225.
  8. McIntosh 2008, p. 354.
  9. Ansumali Mukhopadhyay 2021.
  10. Baldi 1990, p. 342.
  11. Subrahmanyam 1983, p. 40.
  12. Zvelebil 1990.
  13. 1 2 Krishnamurti 2003.
  14. http://www.languageinindia.com/july2013/ravisankarkeralatriballanguages.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  15. https://www.tamildigitallibrary.in/admin/assets/book/TVA_BOK_0012142_Dravidian_comparative_phonology.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  16. Subrahmanyam 1983.
  17. Prema, S.; Sreekumar, P. "Professor P. S. Subrahmanyam, (1939-2016) the distinguished Dravidian linguist: A short profile and his publications".
  18. Krishnamurti 2003, p. [ page needed ].

Works cited

Further reading