Environmental toxicants and fetal development

Last updated

Environmental toxicants and fetal development is the impact of different toxic substances from the environment on the development of the fetus. This article deals with potential adverse effects of environmental toxicants on the prenatal development of both the embryo or fetus, as well as pregnancy complications. The human embryo or fetus is relatively susceptible to impact from adverse conditions within the mother's environment. Substandard fetal conditions often cause various degrees of developmental delays, both physical and mental, for the growing baby. Although some variables do occur as a result of genetic conditions pertaining to the father, a great many are directly brought about from environmental toxins that the mother is exposed to.

Contents

Various toxins pose a significant hazard to fetuses during development. A 2011 study found that virtually all US pregnant women carry multiple chemicals, including some banned since the 1970s, in their bodies. Researchers detected polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, perfluorinated compounds, phenols, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, phthalates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, perchlorate PBDEs, compounds used as flame retardants, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), a pesticide banned in the United States in 1972, in the bodies of 99 to 100 percent of the pregnant women they tested. Among other environmental estrogens, bisphenol A (BPA) was identified in 96 percent of the women surveyed. Several of the chemicals were at the same concentrations that have been associated with negative effects in children from other studies and it is thought that exposure to multiple chemicals can have a greater impact than exposure to only one substance. [1]

Effects

Environmental toxicants can be described separately by what effects they have, such as structural abnormalities, altered growth, functional deficiencies, congenital neoplasia, or even death for the fetus. [2]

Preterm birth

One in ten US babies are born preterm and about 5% have low birth weight. Preterm birth, defined as birth at less than 37 weeks of gestation, is a major contributor of infant mortality throughout childhood. Exposures to environmental toxins such as lead, tobacco smoke, and DDT have been linked with an increased risk for spontaneous abortion, low birth weight, or preterm birth. [3]

Structural congenital abnormality

Toxic substances that are capable of causing structural congenital abnormalities can be termed teratogen s. [4] They are agents extrinsic to embryo or fetus which exert deleterious effects leading to increased risk of malformation, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, altered function, deficient growth or pregnancy wastage. [5] Teratogens are classified in four main categories:

Teratogens affect the fetus by various mechanism including:

Neurodevelopmental disorder

Neuroplastic effects of pollution can give rise to neurodevelopmental disorders.[ citation needed ]

Autism Spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that presents as deficits in social interactions, and communications. [6] These deficits can vary in strength and impairment in day to day function. This could be alexithymia, aggressive behaviors, difficulty regulating emotions, repetitive behavior, and lack of empathy. ASD is known to have many factors some including epigenetic, genetic, and environmental. [7] These findings regarding autism are controversial, however, with many researchers believing that increasing rates in certain areas are a consequence of more accurate screening and diagnostic methods.

Toxicants and their effects

Substances which have been found to be particularly harmful are lead (which is stored in the mother's bones), cigarette smoke, alcohol, mercury (a neurological toxicant consumed through fish), carbon dioxide, and ionizing radiation. [8]

Alcohol

Drinking alcohol in pregnancy can result in a range of disorders known as fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. The most severe of these is fetal alcohol syndrome. [9] These two conditions can lead to a large range of defects that can affect the fetus physically, cognitively, neurodevelopmentally, and can cause neurobehavioral deficits. These changes are dependent on severity of alcohol use and the timing during gestation. [10] The physical characteristics of FAS could include facial abnormalities, growth deficit, and dysfunction of central nervous system development.  Even more so behavioral and emotional differences are also very common in patients with FAS. [11]

Photo of baby with FAS.jpg

Tobacco smoke

Fetal exposure to prenatal tobacco smoke may experience a wide range of behavioral, neurological, and physical difficulties. [12] Adverse effects include stillbirth, placental disruption, prematurity, lower mean birth weight, physical birth defects (cleft palate etc.), decrements in lung function, increased risk of infant mortality. [8]

Mercury

Elemental mercury and methylmercury are two forms of mercury that may pose risks of mercury poisoning in pregnancy. Methylmercury, a worldwide contaminant of seafood and freshwater fish, is known to produce adverse nervous system effects, especially during brain development. Eating fish is the main source of mercury exposure in humans and some fish may contain enough mercury to harm the developing nervous system of an embryo or fetus, sometimes leading to learning disabilities. [13] Mercury is present in many types of fish, but it is mostly found in certain large fish. One well-documented case of widespread mercury ingestion and subsequent fetal development complication took place in the 1950s in Minamata Bay, Japan. Used by a nearby industrial plant in the manufacture of plastics, methyl mercury was discharged into the waters of Minamata Bay, where it went on to be ingested regularly by many villagers who used the fish living in the bay as a dietary staple. Soon, many of the inhabitants who had been consuming the mercury-laden meat began experiencing negative effects from ingesting the toxin; however, the mercury especially impacted pregnant women and their fetuses, resulting in a high rate of miscarriage. Surviving infants exposed to mercury in-utero had extremely high rates of physical and intellectual disabilities, as well as physical abnormalities from exposure in the womb during key stages in fetal physical development. [14] The United States Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency advise pregnant women not to eat swordfish, shark, king mackerel and tilefish and limit consumption of albacore tuna to 6 ounces or less a week. [13]

High mercury levels in newborns in Gaza are theorized to originate from war weaponry. [15]

Mercury exposure in pregnancy may also cause limb defects. [3]

Lead

Adverse effects of lead exposure in pregnancy include miscarriage, low birth weight, neurological delays, anemia, encephalopathy, paralysis, blindness, [3] [8]

The developing nervous system of the fetus is particularly vulnerable to lead toxicity. Neurological toxicity is observed in children of exposed women due to the ability of lead to cross the placental barrier. A special concern for pregnant women is that some of the bone lead accumulation is released into the blood during pregnancy. Several studies have provided evidence that even low maternal exposures to lead produce intellectual and behavioral deficits in children. [16]

Cadmium

Cadmium is a heavy metal that the United States Environmental Protection Agency classifies as a probable human carcinogen. [17] People are often exposed to cadmium through various industrial and agricultural sources, and diet is considered the primary exposure method. [18] The heavy metal has been shown to cause damage to the kidneys, bones, and neurological systems. [19] Pregnant women are at higher risk of health issues from cadmium due to increased absorption of the metal during pregnancy. [20] Cadmium can also pose health risks to the fetus,  some of which may be lifelong, as it interferes with placental function and fetal development. [21] There has been evidence of changes in birth size associated with high levels of cadmium exposure, particularly in female children. [22] Although studies show that relatively low levels of cadmium exposure can affect pregnancy outcomes, more studies must be done to confirm these effects, establish updated exposure limitation guidelines, and explore ways to decrease exposure, particularly during pregnancy. [23]

Dioxin

Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds persists in the environment for a long time and are widespread, so all people have some amount of dioxins in the body. Intrauterine exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like compounds have been associated with subtle developmental changes on the fetus. Effects on the child later in life include changes in liver function, thyroid hormone levels, white blood cell levels, and decreased performance in tests of learning and intelligence. [24]

Air pollution

Air pollution can negatively affect a pregnancy resulting in higher rates of preterm births, growth restriction, and heart and lung problems in the infant. [25]

Compounds such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide all have the potential to cause serious damage when inhaled by an expecting mother. [26] Low birth weight, preterm birth, intrauterine growth retardation, and congenital abnormalities have all been found to be associated with fetal exposure to air pollution. [27] Although pollution can be found virtually everywhere, there are specific sources that have been known to release toxic substances and should be avoided if possible by those who wish to remain relatively free of toxins. These substances include, but are not limited to: steel mills, waste/water treatment plants, sewage incinerators, automotive fabrication plants, oil refineries, and chemical manufacturing plants. [26]

Control of air pollution can be difficult. For example, in Los Angeles, regulations have been made to control pollution by putting rules on industrial and vehicle emissions. Improvements have been made to meet these regulations. Despite these improvements, the region still does not meet federal standards for ozone and particulate matter. Approximately 150,000 births occur every year in Los Angeles. Thus, any effects air pollution has on human development in utero are of great concern to those who live in this region. [28]

Particulate matter (PM) consist of a mixture of particle pollutants that remain in the air, and vary be region. These particles are very small, ranging from PM10 to PM2.5, which can easily enter the lungs. Particulate matter has been shown to be associated with acute cardio-respiratory morbidity and mortality. Intrauterine growth has been shown to be affected by particulate matter, leading to unhealthy outcomes for fetal development such as poor or slow fetal growth, and increasing fetal morbidity and mortality. [29] A study from 2012 found that exposures to PM2.5 differed by race/ethnicity, age, as well as socioeconomic status, leading to certain populations experiencing greater negative health outcomes due to environmental pollution, especially relating to particulate matter. [30]

Pesticides

Pesticides are created for the specific purpose of causing harm (to insects, rodents, and other pests), pesticides have the potential to cause serious damages to a developing fetus, should they be introduced into the fetal environment. Studies have shown that pesticides, particularly fungicides, have shown up in analyses of an infant's cord blood, proving that such toxins are indeed transferred into the baby's body. [31] Overall, the two pesticides most frequently detected in cord blood are diethyltoluamide (DEET) and vinclozolin (a fungicide). [31] Although pesticide toxicity is not as frequently mentioned as some of the other methods of environmental toxicity, such as air pollution, contamination can occur at any time from merely engaging in everyday activities such as walking down a pathway near a contaminated area, or eating foods that have not been washed properly. [31] In 2007 alone, 1.1 billion pounds (500 kt) of pesticides were found present in the environment. [31]

A 2013 review of 27 studies on prenatal and early childhood exposures to organophosphate pesticides found all but one showed negative neurodevelopmental outcomes. In the ten studies that assessed prenatal exposure, "cognitive deficits (related to working memory) were found in children at age 7 years, behavioral deficits (related to attention) seen mainly in toddlers, and motor deficits (abnormal reflexes), seen mainly in neonates." [32]

A systematic review of neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal and postnatal organophosphate pesticide exposure was done in 2014. The review found that "Most of the studies evaluating prenatal exposure observed a negative effect on mental development and an increase in attention problems in preschool and school children." [33]

In 2017, a study looked at the possible effects of agricultural pesticides in over 500,000 births in a largely agricultural region of California and compared their findings to birth outcomes in other less agriculturally dominated California areas. Overall, they found that pesticide exposure increased adverse birth outcomes by 5–9%, but only among those mothers exposed to the highest quantities of pesticides. [34]

Benzenes

Benzene exposure in mothers has been linked to fetal brain defects especially neural tube defects. Benzene can be found in cleaning products, glue or adhesives, paint thinners or strippers, exhaust, gasoline fumes, and tobacco smoke. In one study, BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes) exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy has been clearly indicating negative association with biparietal brain diameter between 20 and 32 weeks of pregnancy. Women with high exposure to toluene had three to five times the miscarriage rate of those with low exposure, and women with occupational benzene exposure have been shown to have an increased rate of miscarriages. Paternal occupational exposure to toluene and formaldehyde has also been linked to miscarriage in their partners. Normal development is highly controlled by hormones, and disruption by man made chemicals can permanently change the course of development. Ambient ozone has been negatively associated with sperm concentration in men, chemicals associated with UOG operations (e.g., benzene, toluene, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol and ozone) have been associated with negative impacts on semen quality, particularly reduced sperm counts. [35]

A 2011 study found a relationship between Neural Tube Defects and maternal exposure to benzene, a compound associated with natural gas extraction. The study found that mothers living in Texas census tracts with higher ambient benzene levels were more likely to have offspring with neural tube defects, such as spina bifida, than mothers living in areas with lower benzene levels. [36]

Other

Avoiding relevant environmental toxins in pregnancy

The American College of Nurse-Midwives recommends the following precautions to minimize exposure to relevant environmental toxins in pregnancy: [38]

Natural gas development

In a rural Colorado study of natural gas development, maternal residence within a 10-mile radius of natural gas wells was found to have a positive association to the prevalence of congenital heart defects (CHDs) and neural tube defects (NTDs). Along with this finding, a small association was found between mean birth weight and the density and proximity to the natural gas wells. Maternal exposure through natural gas wells may come in the form of benzene, solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and other air pollutants such as toluene, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. [39]

In Pennsylvania, unconventional natural gas producing wells increased from zero in 2005 to 3689 in 2013. A 2016 study of 9384 mothers and 10946 neonates in the Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania found prenatal residential exposure to unconventional natural gas development activity was associated with preterm birth and physician-recorded high-risk pregnancy. [40] In Southwest Pennsylvania, maternal proximity to unconventional gas drilling has been found to be associated with decreased birth weight. It was unclear which route of exposure: air, soil or water could be attributed to the association. Further research and larger studies on this topic are needed. [41]

Endocrine disruptors are compounds that can disrupt the normal development and normal hormone levels in humans. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can interact with hormone receptors, as well as change hormone concentrations within the body, leading to incorrect hormone responses in the body as well as disrupt normal enzyme functioning. Oil and gas extraction has been known to contribute to EDCs in the environment, largely due to the high risk of ground and surface water contamination that comes with these extractions. In addition to water contamination, oil and gas extraction also lead to higher levels of air pollution, creating another route of exposure for these endocrine disruptors. This problem often goes under-reported, and therefore, the true magnitude of the impact is underestimated. In 2016, a study Archived 2017-05-06 at the Wayback Machine was conducted to assess the need for an endocrine component to health assessments for drilling and extraction of oil and gas in densely populated areas. With the high potential for release of oil and gas chemicals with extraction, specifically chemicals that have been shown to disrupt normal hormone production and function, the authors highly emphasized the need for a component centering around endocrine function and overall health with health assessments, and how this in turn impacts the environment. [42]

Role of the placenta

The healthy placenta is a semipermeable membrane that does form a barrier for most pathogens and for certain xenobiotic substances. However, it is by design an imperfect barrier since its main function is to transport substances required for growth and development. Placental transport can be by passive diffusion for smaller molecules that are lipid soluble or by active transport for substances that are larger and/or electrically charged. Some toxic chemicals may be actively transported. The dose of a substance received by the fetus is determined by the amount of the substance transported across the placenta as well as the rate of metabolism and elimination of the substance. As the fetus has an immature metabolism, it is unable to detoxify substances very efficiently; and as the placenta plays such an important role in substance exchange between the mother and the fetus, it goes without saying that any toxic substances that the mother is exposed to are transported to the fetus, where they can then affect development. Carbon-dioxide, lead, ethanol (alcohol), and cigarette smoke in particular are all substances that have a high likelihood of placental transferral. [8]

Identifying potential hazards for fetal development requires a basis of scientific information. In 2004, Brent proposed a set of criteria for identifying causes of congenital malformations that also are applicable to developmental toxicity in general. Those criteria are:

See also

References

  1. ↑ Woodruff, T. J.; Zota, A. R.; Schwartz, J. M. (2011). "Environmental Chemicals in Pregnant Women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004". Environmental Health Perspectives. 119 (6): 878–885. Bibcode:2011EnvHP.119..878W. doi:10.1289/ehp.1002727. PMC   3114826 . PMID   21233055.
  2. ↑ Pohl, Hana R.; Smith-Simon, Cassandra; Hicks, Heraline (1998). "Health Effects Classification and Its Role in the Derivation of Minimal Risk Levels: Developmental Effects". Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 28 (1): 55–60. doi:10.1006/rtph.1998.1232. PMID   9784433.
  3. 1 2 3 Lanphear, Bruce P.; Vorhees, Charles V.; Bellinger, David C. (2005). "Protecting Children from Environmental Toxins". PLOS Medicine. 2 (3): e61. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020061 . PMC   1069659 . PMID   15783252.
  4. ↑ "teratogen". dictionary.com. Retrieved 4 October 2013.
  5. ↑ Daftary, Shirish; Chakravarti, Sudip (2011). Manual of Obstetrics, 3rd Edition. Elsevier. pp. 38-41. ISBN   9788131225561.
  6. ↑ van Loo, K. M. J.; Martens, G. J. M. (November 2007). "Genetic and environmental factors in complex neurodevelopmental disorders". Current Genomics. 8 (7): 429–444. doi:10.2174/138920207783591717. ISSN   1389-2029. PMC   2647153 . PMID   19412416.
  7. ↑ Thapar, Anita (2018-10-01). "Discoveries on the Genetics of ADHD in the 21st Century: New Findings and Their Implications". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 175 (10): 943–950. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040383. ISSN   1535-7228. PMID   30111187.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ATSDR (January 17, 2013). "Principles of Pediatric Environmental Health: How Can Parents' Preconception Exposures and In Utero Exposures Affect a Developing Child?". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  9. ↑ "Facts About FASDs". Alcohol Use in Pregnancy | FASD | NCBDDD | CDC. 9 August 2017.
  10. ↑ Chung, Dae D.; Pinson, Marisa R.; Bhenderu, Lokeshwar S.; Lai, Michael S.; Patel, Rhea A.; Miranda, Rajesh C. (2021-08-16). "Toxic and Teratogenic Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Fetal Development, Adolescence, and Adulthood". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22 (16): 8785. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168785 . ISSN   1422-0067. PMC   8395909 . PMID   34445488.
  11. ↑ Popova, Svetlana; Charness, Michael E.; Burd, Larry; Crawford, Andi; Hoyme, H. Eugene; Mukherjee, Raja A. S.; Riley, Edward P.; Elliott, Elizabeth J. (2023-02-23). "Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders". Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 9 (1): 11. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00420-x. ISSN   2056-676X. PMID   36823161.
  12. ↑ Hackshaw, A; Rodeck, C; Boniface, S (Sep–Oct 2011). "Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls". Human Reproduction Update. 17 (5): 589–604. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr022. PMC   3156888 . PMID   21747128.
  13. 1 2 Abelsohn, A; Vanderlinden, LD; Scott, F; Archbold, JA; Brown, TL (January 2011). "Healthy fish consumption and reduced mercury exposure: counseling women in their reproductive years". Canadian Family Physician. 57 (1): 26–30. PMC   3024155 . PMID   21322285.
  14. ↑ Burt Susan D (1986). "Mercury Toxicity, An Overview". AAOHN Journal. 34 (11): 543–546. doi: 10.1177/216507998603401106 . PMID   3640630. S2CID   39617010.
  15. ↑ Manduca, Paola, Awny Naim, and Simona Signoriello. "Specific Association of Teratogen and Toxicant Metals in Hair of Newborns with Congenital Birth Defects or Developmentally Premature Birth in a Cohort of Couples with Documented Parental Exposure to Military Attacks: Observational Study at Al Shifa Hospital, Gaza, Palestine." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. N.p., 14 May 2014. Web. 25 July 2014. <http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph>.
  16. ↑ "Chapter 1, Lead-based Paint Hazards, 98–112". Cdc.gov. Archived from the original on 29 October 2011. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
  17. ↑ Geng, Hui-Xia; Wang, Lai (2019-04-01). "Cadmium: Toxic effects on placental and embryonic development" . Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 67: 102–107. Bibcode:2019EnvTP..67..102G. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2019.02.006. ISSN   1382-6689. PMID   30797179.
  18. ↑ Järup, Lars; Åkesson, Agneta (2009-08-01). "Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem" . Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. New Insights into the Mechanisms of Cadmium Toxicity. 238 (3): 201–208. Bibcode:2009ToxAP.238..201J. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.020. ISSN   0041-008X. PMID   19409405.
  19. ↑ Järup, Lars; Åkesson, Agneta (2009-08-01). "Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem" . Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. New Insights into the Mechanisms of Cadmium Toxicity. 238 (3): 201–208. Bibcode:2009ToxAP.238..201J. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.020. ISSN   0041-008X. PMID   19409405.
  20. ↑ Jacobo-Estrada, Tania; Santoyo-Sánchez, Mitzi; Thévenod, Frank; Barbier, Olivier (July 2017). "Cadmium Handling, Toxicity and Molecular Targets Involved during Pregnancy: Lessons from Experimental Models". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 18 (7): 1590. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071590 . ISSN   1422-0067. PMC   5536077 . PMID   28737682.
  21. ↑ Geng, Hui-Xia; Wang, Lai (2019-04-01). "Cadmium: Toxic effects on placental and embryonic development" . Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 67: 102–107. Bibcode:2019EnvTP..67..102G. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2019.02.006. ISSN   1382-6689. PMID   30797179.
  22. ↑ Kippler, Maria; Tofail, Fahmida; Gardner, Renee; Rahman, Anisur; Hamadani, Jena D.; Bottai, Matteo; Vahter, Marie (February 2012). "Maternal Cadmium Exposure during Pregnancy and Size at Birth: A Prospective Cohort Study". Environmental Health Perspectives. 120 (2): 284–289. Bibcode:2012EnvHP.120..284K. doi:10.1289/ehp.1103711. ISSN   0091-6765. PMC   3279440 . PMID   21862444.
  23. ↑ Gustin, Klara; Barman, Malin; Stråvik, Mia; Levi, Michael; Englund-Ögge, Linda; Murray, Fiona; Jacobsson, Bo; Sandberg, Ann-Sofie; Sandin, Anna; Wold, Agnes E.; Vahter, Marie; Kippler, Maria (2020-10-01). "Low-level maternal exposure to cadmium, lead, and mercury and birth outcomes in a Swedish prospective birth-cohort". Environmental Pollution. 265 (Pt B): 114986. Bibcode:2020EPoll.26514986G. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114986. hdl: 11250/2735605 . ISSN   0269-7491. PMID   32585550.
  24. ↑ Facts about Dioxins. Archived 2019-02-02 at the Wayback Machine from Minnesota Department of Health. Updated October 2006
  25. ↑ Backes, CH; Nelin, T; Gorr, MW; Wold, LE (Jan 10, 2013). "Early life exposure to air pollution: how bad is it?". Toxicology Letters. 216 (1): 47–53. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.11.007. PMC   3527658 . PMID   23164674.
  26. 1 2 Le, Hien Q.; Batterman, Stuart A.; Wirth, Julia J.; Wahl, Robert L.; Hoggatt, Katherine J.; Sadeghnejad, Alireza; Hultin, Mary Lee; Depa, Michael (2012). "Air pollutant exposure and preterm and term small-for-gestational-age births in Detroit, Michigan: Long-term trends and associations". Environment International. 44: 7–17. Bibcode:2012EnInt..44....7L. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2012.01.003. PMC   4331339 . PMID   22314199.
  27. ↑ Minguillón, M.C.; Schembari, A.; Triguero-Mas, M.; de Nazelle, A.; Dadvand, P.; Figueras, F.; Salvado, J.A.; Grimalt, J.O.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.; Querol, X. (2012). "Source apportionment of indoor, outdoor and personal PM2.5 exposure of pregnant women in Barcelona, Spain". Atmospheric Environment. 59: 426–36. Bibcode:2012AtmEn..59..426M. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.04.052.
  28. ↑ Ritz, Beate; Wilhelm, Michelle (2008). "Air Pollution Impacts on Infants and Children". Southern California Environmental Report Card. UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability.
  29. ↑ Dejmek J., Selevan S. G., Benes I., Solansky I., Sram R. J. (1999). "Fetal Growth and Maternal Exposure to Particulate Matter during Pregnancy". Environmental Health Perspectives. 107 (6): 475–80. doi:10.2307/3434630. JSTOR   3434630. PMC   1566587 . PMID   10339448.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. ↑ Bell M., Ebisu K. (2012). "Environmental Inequality in Exposures to Airborne Particulate Matter Components in the United States". Environmental Health Perspectives. 120 (12): 1699–1704. Bibcode:2012EnvHP.120.1699B. doi:10.1289/ehp.1205201. JSTOR   23323098. PMC   3546368 . PMID   22889745.
  31. 1 2 3 4 Wickerham, Erin L.; Lozoff, Betsy; Shao, Jie; Kaciroti, Niko; Xia, Yankai; Meeker, John D. (2012). "Reduced birth weight in relation to pesticide mixtures detected in cord blood of full-term infants". Environment International. 47: 80–5. Bibcode:2012EnInt..47...80W. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.007. PMC   3410737 . PMID   22796478.
  32. ↑ Muñoz-Quezada MT, Lucero BA, Barr DB, Steenland K, Levy K, Ryan PB, Iglesias V, Alvarado S, Concha C, Rojas E, Vega C (2013). "Neurodevelopmental effects in children associated with exposure to organophosphate pesticides: a systematic review". Neurotoxicology. 39: 158–68. Bibcode:2013NeuTx..39..158M. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2013.09.003. PMC   3899350 . PMID   24121005.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. ↑ González-Alzaga B, Lacasaña M, Aguilar-Garduño C, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Ballester F, Rebagliato M, Hernández AF (2014). "A systematic review of neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal and postnatal organophosphate pesticide exposure". Toxicol Lett. 230 (2): 104–21. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.11.019. PMID   24291036.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ↑ Larsen, Ashley; Gaines, Steven (2017-08-29). "Agricultural pesticide use and adverse birth outcomes in the San Joaquin Valley of California". Nature Communications. 8 (1): 302. Bibcode:2017NatCo...8..302L. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00349-2. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   5575123 . PMID   28851866.
  35. ↑ Webb E., Bushkin-Bedient S., Cheng A., Kassotis C. D., Balise V., Nagel S. C. (2014). "Developmental and reproductive effects of chemicals associated with unconventional oil and natural gas operations". Reviews on Environmental Health. 29 (4): 307–18. Bibcode:2014RvEH...29.0057W. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2014-0057 . PMID   25478730.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. ↑ Lupo P. J., Symanski E., Waller D. K., Chan W., Langlois P. H., Canfield M. A., Mitchell L. E. (2010). "Maternal Exposure to Ambient Levels of Benzene and Neural Tube Defects among Offspring: Texas, 1999–2004". Environmental Health Perspectives. 119 (3): 397–402. doi:10.1289/ehp.1002212. PMC   3060005 . PMID   20923742.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. ↑ Lazarus, J. H. "Controlled Antenatal Thyroid Screening study". ISRCTN. doi: 10.1186/ISRCTN46178175 .. Also described in Medscape article: Perchlorate Levels in Pregnancy Linked to Low Childhood IQ, by Nancy A. Melville, October 22, 2013
  38. ↑ Environmental Hazards During Pregnancy Volume 51, No. 1, January/February 2006.
  39. ↑ McKenzie LM, Guo R, Witter RZ, Savitz DA, Newman LS, Adgate JL (2014). "Birth outcomes and maternal residential proximity to natural gas development in rural Colorado". Environ Health Perspect. 122 (4): 412–417. Bibcode:2014EnvHP.122..412M. doi:10.1289/ehp.1306722. PMC   3984231 . PMID   24474681.
  40. ↑ Casey J. A., Savitz D. A., Rasmussen S. G., Ogburn E. L., Pollak J., Mercer D. G., Schwartz B. S. (2015). "Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in Pennsylvania, USA". Epidemiology. 27 (2): 163–72. doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000387. PMC   4738074 . PMID   26426945.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  41. ↑ Stacy S. L., Brink L. L., Larkin J. C., Sadovsky Y., Goldstein B. D., Pitt B. R., Talbott E. O. (2015). "Perinatal Outcomes and Unconventional Natural Gas Operations in Southwest Pennsylvania". PLOS ONE. 10 (6): e0126425. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1026425S. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126425 . PMC   4454655 . PMID   26039051.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. ↑ Kassotis CD, Tillitt DE, Lin CH, McElroy JA, Nagel SC (2016). "Endocrine- disrupting chemicals and oil and natural gas operations: potential environmental contamination and recommendations to assess complex environmental mixtures" (PDF). Environ Health Perspect. 124 (3): 256–264. Bibcode:2016EnvHP.124..256K. doi:10.1289/ehp.1409535. PMC   4786988 . PMID   26311476. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-06. Retrieved 2017-03-31.
  43. ↑ Brent, Robert L. (2004). "Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: The pediatrician's role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors" . Pediatrics. 113 (4 Suppl): 957–68. doi:10.1542/peds.113.S3.957. PMID   15060188. S2CID   12476696.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.