Pregnancy test

Last updated

A modern hormone pregnancy test, showing a positive result Pregnancy Test Positive.jpg
A modern hormone pregnancy test, showing a positive result
A series of pregnancy test strips, taken one per day at the beginning of a pregnancy. Pregnancy test series starting to show positive.jpg
A series of pregnancy test strips, taken one per day at the beginning of a pregnancy.

A pregnancy test is used to determine whether a female is pregnant or not. The two primary methods are testing for the female pregnancy hormone (human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)) in blood or urine using a pregnancy test kit, and scanning with ultrasonography. [1] Testing blood for hCG results in the earliest detection of pregnancy. [2] Almost all pregnant women will have a positive urine pregnancy test one week after the first day of a missed menstrual period. [3]

Contents

Types

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)

This image depicts how the hormone hCG, produced by pregnant women's placentas, is detected in urine pregnancy tests to indicate a positive result. How hCG Is Used To Indicate a Positive Pregnancy Test.svg
This image depicts how the hormone hCG, produced by pregnant women's placentas, is detected in urine pregnancy tests to indicate a positive result.

Identified in the early 20th century, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a glycoprotein hormone that rises quickly in the first few weeks of pregnancy, typically reaching a peak at 8- to 10-weeks gestational age. [4] [5] hCG is produced by what will become the placenta. [6] hCG testing can be performed with a blood (serum) sample (typically done in a medical facility) or with urine (which can be performed in a medical facility or at home). The assays used to detect the presence of hCG in blood or urine are generally reliable and inexpensive. Secretion of hCG can occur as soon as 6 days following ovulation and on average 8–10 days following ovulation; this is the earliest hCG can be detected in a blood sample. [7] [5] [8] The hCG concentration in blood is higher than in urine. Therefore, a blood test can be positive while the urine test is still negative. [9] [10]

Qualitative tests (yes/no or positive/negative results) look for the presence of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in blood or urine. For a qualitative test the thresholds for a positive test are generally determined by an hCG cut-off where at least 95% of pregnant women would get a positive result on the day of their first missed period. [11] Qualitative urine pregnancy tests vary in sensitivity. High-sensitivity tests are more common and typically detect hCG levels between 20 and 50 milli-international units/mL (mIU/mL). Low-sensitivity tests detect hCG levels between 1500 and 2000 mIU/mL and have unique clinical applications, including confirmation of medication abortion success. [12] Qualitative urine tests available for home use are typically designed as lateral flow tests.

Quantitative tests measure the exact amount of hCG in the sample. Blood tests can detect hCG levels as low as 1 mIU/mL, and typically clinicians will diagnose a positive pregnancy test at 5mIU/mL. [11]

Table 1. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) detection thresholds by test type and sample type
Urine pregnancy testBlood pregnancy test
Detection thresholdsHigh-sensitivity:

Qualitative test: 20 to 50 mIU/mL, depending on test

Low-sensitivity:

Qualitative test: 1500-2000 mIU/mL, depending on test

Qualitative test:

5 to 10 mIU/mL, depending on test

Quantitative test:

1 to 2 mIU/mL for an ultrasensitive test

There is a multilevel urine pregnancy test (MLPT) that measures hCG levels semiquantitatively. The hCG levels are measured at <25, 25 to 99, 100 to 499, 500 to 1999, 2000 to 9999, and >10,000 mIU/mL. This test has utility for determining the success of medication abortion. [13] [14]

Ultrasound

Obstetric ultrasonography may also be used to detect and diagnose pregnancy. It is very common to have a positive at-home urine pregnancy test before an ultrasound. Both abdominal and vaginal ultrasound may be used, but vaginal ultrasound allows for earlier visualization of the pregnancy. With obstetric ultrasonography the gestational sac (intrauterine fluid collection) can be visualized at 4.5 to 5 weeks gestation, the yolk sac at 5 to 6 weeks gestation, and fetal pole at 5.5 to 6 weeks gestation. Ultrasound is used to diagnose multiple gestation. [3] [15]

Accuracy

The control line of this pregnancy test is blank, making the test invalid Negative Pregnancy Test.JPG
The control line of this pregnancy test is blank, making the test invalid
The control line on the left of this pregnancy test is visible, suggesting that the test result is valid. A pale purple line has also appeared on the right hand side (the test line) which clearly signifies that the subject is pregnant PositivePregnancyTest.JPG
The control line on the left of this pregnancy test is visible, suggesting that the test result is valid. A pale purple line has also appeared on the right hand side (the test line) which clearly signifies that the subject is pregnant

A systematic review published in 1998 showed that home pregnancy test kits, when used by experienced technicians, are almost as accurate as professional laboratory testing (97.4%). When used by consumers, however, the accuracy fell to 75%: the review authors noted that many users misunderstood or failed to follow the instructions included in the kits. [16]

False positive

False positive pregnancy test results are rare and may occur for several reasons, including:

Spurious evaporation lines may appear on many home pregnancy tests if read after the suggested 3–5 minute window or reaction time, independent of an actual pregnancy. False positives may also appear on tests used past their expiration date. [19]

False positive pregnancy test can happen due to 'phantom hCG' which is due to people having human antianimal or heterophilic antibodies. [20]

False positives can also be caused by (in order of incidence) quiescent pregnancy, pituitary sulfated hCG, heterophilic antibody, familial hCG syndrome and cancer. [21]

Due to use of medication

Urine tests can be falsely positive in those that are taking the medications: chlorpromazine, promethazine, phenothiazines, methadone, [18] aspirin, carbamazepine and drugs that cause high urinary pH. [22]

False negative

False negative readings can occur when testing is done too early. hCG levels rise rapidly in early pregnancy and the chances of false negative test results diminish with time (increasing gestational age). [23] Less sensitive urine tests and qualitative blood tests may not detect pregnancy until three or four days after implantation. [24] Menstruation occurs on average 14 days after ovulation, so the likelihood of a false negative is low once a menstrual period is late. Ovulation may not occur at a predictable time in the menstrual cycle. A number of factors may cause an unexpectedly early or late ovulation, even for people with a history of regular menstrual cycles. [25] Medical providers often struggle to 'rule out' pregnancy for medical testing or treatment that cannot be conducted during pregnancy before they can do an accurate urine pregnancy test. [26]

More rare, false negative results can also occur due to a "hook effect", where a sample with a very high level of hCG is tested without dilution, causing an invalid result. [27]

Other uses

Pregnancy tests may be used to predict if a pregnancy is likely to continue or is abnormal. Miscarriage, or spontaneous abortion or pregnancy loss, is common in early pregnancy. [28] Serial quantitative blood tests may be done, usually 48 hours apart, and interpreted based on the knowledge that hCG in a viable normal pregnancy rises rapidly in early pregnancy. For example, for a starting hCG level of 1,500 mIU/ml or less, the hCG of continuing, normal pregnancy will increase at least 49% in 48 hours. However, for pregnancies with a higher starting hCG, between 1,500 and 3,000 mIU/ml, the hCG should rise at least 40%; for a starting hCG greater than 3,000 mIU/ml, the hCG should increase at least 33%. [29] Failure to rise by these minimums may indicate that the pregnancy is not normal, either as a failed intrauterine pregnancy or a possible ectopic pregnancy. [29]

Ultrasound is also a common tool for determining viability and location of a pregnancy. Serial ultrasound may be used to identify non-viable pregnancies, as pregnancies that do not grow in size or develop expected structural findings on repeated ultrasounds over a 1-2 week interval may be identified as abnormal. [30] Occasionally, a single ultrasound may be used to identify a pregnancy as non-viable; for example, an embryo that is greater than a certain size but that lacks a visible heart beat may be confidently determined to be not viable without the need for follow up ultrasound for confirmation. [30]

Research

Research has identified at least one other possible marker that may appear earlier and exclusively during pregnancy. For example, early pregnancy factor (EPF) can be detected in blood within 48 hours of fertilization, rather than after implantation. [31] However, its reliable use as a pregnancy test remains unclear as studies have shown its presence in physiological situations besides pregnancy, and its application to humans remains limited. [32]

History

Jan Steen's The Doctor's Visit. Included in this 17th-century painting is a depiction of a dubious pregnancy test: a ribbon dipped in the patient's urine and then burned. JanSteen-Doctor'sVisit(1658-1662).jpg
Jan Steen's The Doctor's Visit. Included in this 17th-century painting is a depiction of a dubious pregnancy test: a ribbon dipped in the patient's urine and then burned.

Records of attempts at pregnancy testing have been found as far back as the ancient Greek and ancient Egyptian cultures. The ancient Egyptians watered bags of wheat and barley with the urine of a possibly pregnant woman. Germination indicated pregnancy. The type of grain that sprouted was taken as an indicator of the fetus's sex. [34] Hippocrates suggested that a woman who had missed her period should drink a solution of honey in water at bedtime: resulting abdominal distention and cramps would indicate the presence of a pregnancy. Avicenna and many physicians after him in the Middle Ages performed uroscopy , a nonscientific method to evaluate urine.

Selmar Aschheim and Bernhard Zondek introduced testing based on the presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in 1928. [35] Early studies of hCG had concluded that it was produced by the pituitary gland. In the 1930s, Doctor Georgeanna Jones discovered that hCG was produced not by the pituitary gland, but by the placenta. This discovery was important in relying on hCG as an early marker of pregnancy. [36] In the Aschheim and Zondek test, an infantile female mouse was injected subcutaneously with urine of the woman to be tested, and the mouse later was killed and dissected. Presence of ovulation indicated that the urine contained hCG and meant that the subject was pregnant. A similar test was developed using immature rabbits. Here, too, killing the animal to check her ovaries was necessary.

At the beginning of the 1930s, Hillel Shapiro and Harry Zwarenstein, who were researchers at the University of Cape Town, discovered that if urine from a pregnant woman was injected into the South African Xenopus frog and the frog ovulated, this indicated that the subject was pregnant. This test, known as the frog test, was used throughout the world from the 1930s to 1960s, with Xenopus frogs being exported in great numbers. [37] [38] Shapiro's advisor, Lancelot Hogben, claimed to have developed the pregnancy test himself, but refuted by both Shapiro and Zwarenstein in a letter to the British Medical Journal. A later article, independently authored, granted Hogben credit for the principle of using Xenopus to determine gonadotropin levels in a pregnant woman's urine, but not for its usage as a functional pregnancy test. [39]

Hormonal pregnancy tests such as Primodos and Duogynon were used in the 1960s and 1970s in the UK and Germany. These tests involved taking a dosed amount of hormones, and observing the response a few days later. A pregnant woman does not react, as she is producing the hormones in pregnancy; a subject who is not pregnant responds to the absence of the hormone by beginning a new menstrual cycle. While the test was (is) generally considered accurate, research advancements have replaced it with simpler techniques. [40]

Immunologic pregnancy tests were introduced in 1960 when Wide and Gemzell presented a test based on in-vitro hemagglutination inhibition. This was a first step away from in-vivo pregnancy testing [41] [42] and initiated a series of improvements in pregnancy testing leading to the contemporary at-home testing. [42] Direct measurement of antigens, such as hCG, was made possible after the invention of the radioimmunoassay in 1959. [43] Radioimmunoassays require sophisticated apparatus and special radiation precautions and are expensive.

Organon International obtained the first patent on a home pregnancy test in 1969, two years after product designer Margaret Crane noticed that the laboratory testing procedure was relatively simple and made a prototype. The product became available in Canada in 1971, and the United States in 1977, after delays caused by concerns over sexual morality and the ability of potentially pregnant women to perform the test and cope with the results without a doctor. [44]

Another home pregnancy testing kit was based on the work of Judith Vaitukaitis and Glenn Braunstein, who developed a sensitive hCG assay at the National Institutes of Health. [45] [46] That test went onto the market in 1978. [47] In the 1970s, the discovery of monoclonal antibodies led to the development of the relatively simple and cheap immunoassays, such as agglutination-inhibition-based assays and sandwich ELISA, used in modern home pregnancy tests. Tests are now so cheap that they can be mass-produced in a general publication and used for advertising. [48]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ectopic pregnancy</span> Female reproductive system health issue

Ectopic pregnancy is a complication of pregnancy in which the embryo attaches outside the uterus. Signs and symptoms classically include abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding, but fewer than 50 percent of affected women have both of these symptoms. The pain may be described as sharp, dull, or crampy. Pain may also spread to the shoulder if bleeding into the abdomen has occurred. Severe bleeding may result in a fast heart rate, fainting, or shock. With very rare exceptions, the fetus is unable to survive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amniocentesis</span> Sampling of amniotic fluid done mainly to detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities

Amniocentesis is a medical procedure used primarily in the prenatal diagnosis of genetic conditions. It has other uses such as in the assessment of infection and fetal lung maturity. Prenatal diagnostic testing, which includes amniocentesis, is necessary to conclusively diagnose the majority of genetic disorders, with amniocentesis being the gold-standard procedure after 15 weeks' gestation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luteinizing hormone</span> Gonadotropin secreted by the adenohypophysis

Luteinizing hormone is a hormone produced by gonadotropic cells in the anterior pituitary gland. The production of LH is regulated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) from the hypothalamus. In females, an acute rise of LH known as an LH surge, triggers ovulation and development of the corpus luteum. In males, where LH had also been called interstitial cell–stimulating hormone (ICSH), it stimulates Leydig cell production of testosterone. It acts synergistically with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human chorionic gonadotropin</span> Hormone

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a hormone for the maternal recognition of pregnancy produced by trophoblast cells that are surrounding a growing embryo, which eventually forms the placenta after implantation. The presence of hCG is detected in some pregnancy tests. Some cancerous tumors produce this hormone; therefore, elevated levels measured when the patient is not pregnant may lead to a cancer diagnosis and, if high enough, paraneoplastic syndromes, however, it is not known whether this production is a contributing cause, or an effect of carcinogenesis. The pituitary analog of hCG, known as luteinizing hormone (LH), is produced in the pituitary gland of males and females of all ages.

eFSH is a follicle-stimulating hormone obtained from equine species, used to stimulate fertility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prenatal testing</span> Testing for diseases or conditions in a fetus

Prenatal testing is a tool that can be used to detect some birth defects at various stages prior to birth. Prenatal testing consists of prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis, which are aspects of prenatal care that focus on detecting problems with the pregnancy as early as possible. These may be anatomic and physiologic problems with the health of the zygote, embryo, or fetus, either before gestation even starts or as early in gestation as practicable. Screening can detect problems such as neural tube defects, chromosome abnormalities, and gene mutations that would lead to genetic disorders and birth defects, such as spina bifida, cleft palate, Down syndrome, trisomy 18, Tay–Sachs disease, sickle cell anemia, thalassemia, cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, and fragile X syndrome. Some tests are designed to discover problems which primarily affect the health of the mother, such as PAPP-A to detect pre-eclampsia or glucose tolerance tests to diagnose gestational diabetes. Screening can also detect anatomical defects such as hydrocephalus, anencephaly, heart defects, and amniotic band syndrome.

Gonadotropins are glycoprotein hormones secreted by gonadotropic cells of the anterior pituitary of vertebrates. This family includes the mammalian hormones follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), the placental/chorionic gonadotropins, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG), as well as at least two forms of fish gonadotropins. These hormones are central to the complex endocrine system that regulates normal growth, sexual development, and reproductive function. LH and FSH are secreted by the anterior pituitary gland, while hCG and eCG are secreted by the placenta in pregnant humans and mares, respectively. The gonadotropins act on the gonads, controlling gamete and sex hormone production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Molar pregnancy</span> Abnormal form of pregnancy (human disorder)

A molar pregnancy, also known as a hydatidiform mole, is an abnormal form of pregnancy in which a non-viable fertilized egg implants in the uterus. It falls under the category of gestational trophoblastic diseases. During a molar pregnancy, the uterus contains a growing mass characterized by swollen chorionic villi, resembling clusters of grapes. The occurrence of a molar pregnancy can be attributed to the fertilized egg lacking an original maternal nucleus. As a result, the products of conception may or may not contain fetal tissue. These molar pregnancies are categorized into two types: partial moles and complete moles, where the term 'mole' simply denotes a clump of growing tissue or a ‘growth'.

The rabbit test, or Friedman test, was an early pregnancy test developed in 1931 by Maurice Friedman and Maxwell Edward Lapham at the University of Pennsylvania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gestational trophoblastic disease</span> Pregnancy-related tumours

Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) is a term used for a group of pregnancy-related tumours. These tumours are rare, and they appear when cells in the womb start to proliferate uncontrollably. The cells that form gestational trophoblastic tumours are called trophoblasts and come from tissue that grows to form the placenta during pregnancy.

Gestational choriocarcinoma is a form of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, which is a type of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), that can occur during pregnancy. It is a rare disease where the trophoblast, a layer of cells surrounding the blastocyst, undergoes abnormal developments, leading to trophoblastic tumors. The choriocarcinoma can metastasize to other organs, including the lungs, kidney, and liver. The amount and degree of choriocarcinoma spread to other parts of the body can vary greatly from person to person.

The triple test, also called triple screen, the Kettering test or the Bart's test, is an investigation performed during pregnancy in the second trimester to classify a patient as either high-risk or low-risk for chromosomal abnormalities.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a medical condition that can occur in some women who take fertility medication to stimulate egg growth, and in other women in very rare cases. Most cases are mild, but rarely the condition is severe and can lead to serious illness or death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trophoblastic neoplasm</span> Medical condition

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is group of rare diseases related to pregnancy and included in gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) in which abnormal trophoblast cells grow in the uterus. GTN can be classified into benign and malignant lesions. Benign lesions include placental site nodule and hydatidiform moles while malignant lesions have four subtypes including invasive mole, gestational choriocarcinoma, placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor (ETT). The choriocarcinoma has 2 significant subtypes including gestational and non-gestational and they are differentiated by their different biological feature and prognosis. Signs and symptoms of GTN will appear vary from person to person and depending upon the type of the disease. They may include uterine bleeding not related to menstruation, pain or pressure in pelvis, large uterus and high blood pressure during pregnancy. The cause of this disease is unknown but the identification of the tumor based on total beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) in the serum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuchal scan</span> Routine ultrasound done between 11 and 14 weeks pregnancy

A nuchal scan or nuchal translucency (NT) scan/procedure is a sonographic prenatal screening scan (ultrasound) to detect chromosomal abnormalities in a fetus, though altered extracellular matrix composition and limited lymphatic drainage can also be detected.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is a technique used in assisted reproduction involving the use of fertility medications to induce ovulation by multiple ovarian follicles. These multiple follicles can be taken out by oocyte retrieval for use in in vitro fertilisation (IVF), or be given time to ovulate, resulting in superovulation which is the ovulation of a larger-than-normal number of eggs, generally in the sense of at least two. When ovulated follicles are fertilised in vivo, whether by natural or artificial insemination, there is a very high risk of a multiple pregnancy.

Poor ovarian reserve is a condition of low fertility characterized by 1): low numbers of remaining oocytes in the ovaries or 2) possibly impaired preantral oocyte development or recruitment. Recent research suggests that premature ovarian aging and premature ovarian failure may represent a continuum of premature ovarian senescence. It is usually accompanied by high FSH levels.

Gonadotropin preparations are drugs that mimic the physiological effects of gonadotropins, used therapeutically mainly as fertility medication for ovarian hyperstimulation and ovulation induction. For example, the so-called menotropins consist of LH and FSH extracted from human urine from menopausal women. There are also recombinant variants.

Theca lutein cyst is a type of bilateral functional ovarian cyst filled with clear, straw-colored fluid. These cysts result from exaggerated physiological stimulation due to elevated levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) or hypersensitivity to beta-hCG. On ultrasound and MRI, theca lutein cysts appear in multiples on ovaries that are enlarged.

The frog test is a pregnancy testing method relying on frogs to show the pregnancy status of women. Since immunological pregnancy tests were not yet developed before 1960s, women living a century ago relied on urine-based pregnancy tests using different animals, ranging from mice to frogs. Nowadays, the advancement in medical technology has enabled women to accurately check their pregnancy status by using 'pee-on-a-stick' pregnancy test kits at home. Before these accessible and convenient test kits were invented, scientists strived to discover a way in spotting pregnancy-related hormones by a natural, simple test, where animals were often included as clinical tools to facilitate the process. The frog test or frog pregnancy test is one of the past prevalent pregnancy scanning methods.

References

  1. Chard T (1992). "REVIEW: Pregnancy tests: a review". Human Reproduction. 7 (5): 701–710. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137722. ISSN   1460-2350. PMID   1639991.
  2. Casanova R, Weiss PM, Chuang A, Goepfert AR, Hueppchen NA (April 2018). Beckmann and Ling's obstetrics and gynecology (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN   978-1-4963-5309-2. OCLC   949870151.
  3. 1 2 3 Bastian LA, Brown HL (November 2019). "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of early pregnancy". UpToDate.
  4. Cole LA (2010). "Biological functions of hCG and hCG-related molecules". Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 8 (1): 102. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-102 . ISSN   1477-7827. PMC   2936313 . PMID   20735820.
  5. 1 2 Braunstein GD, Rasor J, Danzer H, Adler D, Wade ME (15 November 1976). "Serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels throughout normal pregnancy". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 126 (6): 678–681. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(76)90518-4. ISSN   0002-9378. PMID   984142.
  6. Rhoades R, Bell DR, eds. (2009). Medical physiology: principles for clinical medicine (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN   978-0-7817-6852-8. OCLC   144771424.
  7. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR (10 June 1999). "Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy". The New England Journal of Medicine. 340 (23): 1796–1799. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906103402304 . ISSN   0028-4793. PMID   10362823.
  8. Lenton EA, Neal LM, Sulaiman R (June 1982). "Plasma concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin from the time of implantation until the second week of pregnancy". Fertility and Sterility. 37 (6): 773–778. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46337-5 . ISSN   0015-0282. PMID   7115557.
  9. O'Connor RE, Bibro CM, Pegg PJ, Bouzoukis JK (July 1993). "The comparative sensitivity and specificity of serum and urine HCG determinations in the ED". The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 11 (4): 434–436. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(93)90186-f. ISSN   0735-6757. PMID   8216535.
  10. Davies S, Byrn F, Cole LA (June 2003). "Human chorionic gonadotropin testing for early pregnancy viability and complications". Clinics in Laboratory Medicine. 23 (2): 257–264, vii. doi:10.1016/s0272-2712(03)00026-x. ISSN   0272-2712. PMID   12848444.
  11. 1 2 Gronowski AM, ed. (2004). Handbook of clinical laboratory testing during pregnancy. Totowa, N.J.: Humana Press. ISBN   1-58829-270-3. OCLC   53325293.
  12. Raymond EG, Shochet T, Bracken H (July 2018). "Low-sensitivity urine pregnancy testing to assess medical abortion outcome: A systematic review". Contraception. 98 (1): 30–35. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.03.013. ISSN   0010-7824. PMID   29534996. S2CID   206967147.
  13. Raymond EG, Shochet T, Blum J, Sheldon WR, Platais I, Bracken H, Dabash R, Weaver MA, Ngoc NT, Blumenthal PD, Winikoff B (May 2017). "Serial multilevel urine pregnancy testing to assess medical abortion outcome: a meta-analysis". Contraception. 95 (5): 442–448. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.004. ISSN   0010-7824. PMID   28041991.
  14. Lynd K, Blum J, Ngoc NT, Shochet T, Blumenthal PD, Winikoff B (2013). "Simplified medical abortion using a semi-quantitative pregnancy test for home-based follow-up". International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 121 (2): 144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.11.022 . ISSN   1879-3479. PMID   23477704.
  15. Woo J (2006). "Why and when is Ultrasound used in Pregnancy?". Obstetric Ultrasound: A Comprehensive Guide. Retrieved 27 May 2007.
  16. Bastian LA, Nanda K, Hasselblad V, Simel DL (1998). "Diagnostic efficiency of home pregnancy test kits. A meta-analysis". Arch Fam Med. 7 (5): 465–9. doi:10.1001/archfami.7.5.465. PMID   9755740. Archived from the original on 6 December 2008. Retrieved 12 May 2008.
  17. Stenman U, Alfthan H, Hotakainen K (July 2004). "Human chorionic gonadotropin in cancer". Clinical Biochemistry. 37 (7): 549–561. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.008. PMID   15234236.
  18. 1 2 Wallach J (2007). Interpretation of diagnostic tests (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p.  866. ISBN   978-0-7817-3055-6.
  19. "First Response early result pregnancy test" (PDF). FirstResponse.com.
  20. Wallach J (2014). Wallach's Interpretation of Diagnostic Tests: Pathways to Arriving at a Clinical Diagnosis (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN   978-1-4511-9176-9.
  21. Laurence A. Cole, Stephen A. Butler (2020). 100 Years of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin: Reviews and New Perspectives. Elsevier. p. 87. ISBN   978-0-12-820050-6.
  22. Betz D, Fane K (2020). "Human Chorionic Gonadotropin". Statpearls. PMID   30422545. CC-BY icon.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  23. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR (1999). "Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy". New England Journal of Medicine. 340 (23): 1796–1799. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906103402304 . PMID   10362823.
  24. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR (June 1999). "Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy". New England Journal of Medicine. 340 (23): 1796–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906103402304 . PMID   10362823.
  25. Chard T (May 1992). "Pregnancy tests: a review". Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 7 (5): 701–710. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137722. ISSN   0268-1161. PMID   1639991.
  26. Brown E (2020). "Projected diagnosis, anticipatory medicine, and uncertainty: How medical providers 'rule out' potential pregnancy in contraceptive counseling". Social Science & Medicine. 258: 113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113118 . Retrieved 6 February 2024.
  27. Griffey RT, Trent CJ, Bavolek RA, Keeperman JB, Sampson C, Poirier RF (January 2013). ""Hook-like effect" causes false-negative point-of-care urine pregnancy testing in emergency patients". The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 44 (1): 155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.032 . ISSN   0736-4679. PMID   21835572.
  28. "Clinical presentation of ectopic pregnancy", Ectopic Pregnancy, Cambridge University Press, 26 January 1996, pp. 14–20, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663475.002, ISBN   978-0-521-49612-4
  29. 1 2 American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology (March 2018). "ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 131 (3): e91–e103. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002560. ISSN   0029-7844. PMID   29470343. S2CID   3466601.
  30. 1 2 Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, Blaivas M (10 October 2013). Campion EW (ed.). "Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester". New England Journal of Medicine. 369 (15): 1443–1451. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1302417. ISSN   0028-4793. PMID   24106937.
  31. Fan XG, Zheng ZQ (1997). "A study of early pregnancy factor activity in preimplantation". Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 37 (5): 359–64. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.1997.tb00244.x. PMID   9196793. S2CID   71525444.
  32. Clarke FM. Controversies in assisted reproduction and genetics. Does "EPF" have an identity?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14(9):489–491. doi:10.1023/a:1021110906666
  33. Clark, Stephanie Brown. (2005).Jan Steen: The Doctor's Visit.Literature, Arts, and Medicine Database. Retrieved 27 May 2007.
    Lubsen-Brandsma, M.A. (1997). Jan Steen's fire pot; pregnancy test or gynecological therapeutic method in the 17th century?. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 141(51), 2513–7. Retrieved 24 May 2006.
    "The Doctor's Visit." (n.d.). The Web Gallery of Art. Retrieved 24 May 2006.
  34. Ghalioungui P, Khalil S, Ammar AR (July 1963). "On an Ancient Egyptian Method of Diagnosing Pregnancy and Determining Foetal Sex". Medical History. 7 (3): 241–6. doi:10.1017/s0025727300028386. ISSN   0025-7273. PMC   1034829 . PMID   13960613.
  35. Speert H (1973). Iconographia Gyniatrica. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. ISBN   978-0-8036-8070-8.
  36. Damewood MD, Rock JA (August 2005). "In memoriam: Georgeanna Seegar Jones, M.D.: her legacy lives on" (PDF). Fertility and Sterility. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 84 (2): 541–2. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.019. PMID   16363033. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 December 2008. Retrieved 31 December 2007.
  37. Christophers SR (16 November 1946). "The Government Lymph Establishment". Br Med J. 2 (4480): 752. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.4480.752. ISSN   0007-1447. PMC   2054716 .
  38. Shapiro HA, Zwarenstein H (19 May 1934). "A Rapid Test for Pregnancy on Xenopus lævis". Nature. 133 (3368): 762. Bibcode:1934Natur.133..762S. doi: 10.1038/133762a0 . ISSN   0028-0836. S2CID   4123060.
  39. Gurdon, J B; Hopwood, N (1 February 2003). "The introduction of Xenopus laevis into developmental biology: of empire, pregnancy testing and ribosomal genes". International Journal of Developmental Biology. 44 (1). ISSN 0214-6282
  40. Fiala C (29 March 2018). "Museum für Verhütung und Schwangerschaftsabbruch - Museum of Contraception and Abortion". en.muvs.org. Archived from the original on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  41. Bleavins MR, Carini C, Malle JR, Rahbari R (2010). Biomarkers in Drug Development: A Handbook of Practice, Application, and Strategy, Chapter 1, Blood and Urine Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN   978-0-470-16927-8.
  42. 1 2 Wide L (2005). "Inventions leading to the development of the diagnostic test kit industry — from the modern pregnancy test to the sandwich assays". Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 110 (3): 193–216. doi: 10.3109/2000-1967-066 . PMID   16454158.
  43. Yalow RS, Berson SA (July 1960). "Immunoassay of endogenous plasma insulin in man". Journal of Clinical Investigation. 39 (7): 1157–75. doi:10.1172/JCI104130. PMC   441860 . PMID   13846364.
  44. Kennedy P (29 July 2016). "Could Women Be Trusted With Their Own Pregnancy Tests?". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 12 December 2016.
  45. Vaitukaitis JL (December 2004). "Development of the home pregnancy test". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1038 (1): 220–2. Bibcode:2004NYASA1038..220V. doi:10.1196/annals.1315.030. PMID   15838116. S2CID   29315420.
  46. "History of the Pregnancy Test Kit - Home Page". history.nih.gov. Retrieved 4 May 2020.
  47. A Thin Blue Line: The History of the Pregnancy Test Kit. "A Timeline of Pregnancy Testing". National Institutes of Health. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
  48. Nudd T (9 January 2018). "Ikea Wants You to Pee on This Ad. If You're Pregnant, It Will Give You a Discount on a Crib". Adweek . Retrieved 13 January 2018.