Gary Chartier

Last updated

professor

Gary William Chartier
Gary Chartier by Gage Skidmore.jpg
Born1966 (age 5758)
Education La Sierra University (BA)
University of Cambridge (PhD, LLD)
University of California, Los Angeles (JD)
Notable workAnarchy and Legal Order (2013)
Era Contemporary philosophy
Region Western philosophy
School Analytic philosophy, natural law, process philosophy, bleeding-heart libertarianism
Institutions La Sierra University, University of Cambridge
Main interests
Anarchism, left-libertarianism, meta-ethics, applied ethics, political philosophy, philosophy of religion, philosophical theology

Gary William Chartier (born 1966) is a legal scholar, philosopher, political theorist, and theologian. [1] His work addresses anarchism and ethics. Chartier is a professor and serves as associate dean of La Sierra University's business school.

Contents

Early life

Chartier was born in 1966, in Glendale, California, and raised in a conservative Protestant (Seventh-day Adventist) home. His father was an accountant and physician. In high school, Chartier became interested in economic libertarian authors, following his father's ideological lean. [2] He received his bachelor's degree from La Sierra University in 1987 and his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in 1991. [3]

Academic career

After working as the editor of a newspaper in Temecula, California, Chartier enrolled at the UCLA School of Law, graduating with a J.D. in 2001. During his legal studies, he served as a lecturer in business ethics at La Sierra and began a full-time academic appointment there in September 2001. [2] In 2015, the University of Cambridge presented Chartier with an earned higher doctorate, an LLD, [4] in recognition of his work in legal theory. [5] He is currently Associate Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law and Business Ethics at La Sierra's Zapara School of Business. [3] [6]

Philosophy

Chartier advocates for a variant of natural law thinking, which he has employed in discussions of anarchism, economic life, [7] and the moral status and claims of non-human animals. Other topics he has discussed include sexuality [8] and lying. [9]

Kevin Carson's work, in particular, provided a model for Chartier's reconciliation of his leftist politics with opposition to the state, and helped him to combine left-libertarian market anarchism with insights from natural law theory. [2]

Reception

Reviewing Anarchy and Legal Order in Common Knowledge, Peter Leeson described it as "intriguing" and classed it "among the most sophisticated ethical defenses of anarchy I have encountered." [10] In Anarchist Studies, Eric Roark wrote: "Gary Chartier's Anarchy and Legal Order offers nothing less than a tremendous contribution to contemporary libertarian and anarchist thought." Roark highlighted what he characterized as a "compelling and rich vision of anarchy forged by a just legal regime." [11] Edward Stringham characterized the book as "well written, thought provoking, and a welcome addition to the literature." [12]

Aeon Skoble of Bridgewater State University suggested in a Reason review that Chartier's "arguments [in the book] are laid out with such elegance and precision that any intelligent lay reader should be able to understand them." Skoble writes: "Anarchy and Legal Order is an impressive contribution to libertarian thought generally, and in particular to the ongoing debates on anarchism versus minarchism and on libertarianism's place vis-a-vis the left/right dichotomy. It's a must-read for those interested in political philosophy, and it may well challenge readers' long-held beliefs about the nature of government." [13] In a symposium in Studies in Emergent Order devoted to the book, Skoble added: "Chartier's argument demonstrates not only that natural law theory is compatible with spontaneous order theory, but also that what this confluence points to is a voluntary, polycentric legal order. The book is thus valuable not only for offering a robust defense of polycentrism, but for doing so in a way that ties together two important threads from the liberal tradition, natural law and spontaneous order, and in doing so, enhances our understanding of both." [14] Also writing in the symposium, Jason Brennan criticized Chartier's reliance on the controversial new natural law theory and objected to his embrace of the theory's view that basic aspects of well-being are incommensurable, a view Brennan suggested led to counterintuitive, implausible conclusions. [15] [16] While expressing some concerns about the feasibility of Chartier's proposals, Paul Dragos Aligica concluded: "Anarchy and Legal Order is currently the book to read if one wants to explore the potential and limits of natural law, non-aggression maxim, praxeology based doctrines of stateless social order. Austrian scholars of all persuasions will benefit immensely from engaging with its arguments and the intellectual precedent it creates." [17]

St. John's University economist Charles Clarke criticized Economic Justice and Natural Law's anarchism, evaluating it as insufficiently attentive to the need for governmental involvement in the economy and as unduly similar in tone to the work of Austrian economists. [18] The book was the focus of a Molinari Society session at the April 2011 San Diego convention of the American Philosophical Association's Pacific Division. [19]

The Analogy of Love received mixed reviews. In the course of a tepidly favorable assessment, Timothy Gorringe maintained that some passages disposed him to "reach for the whiskey bottle," though he also observed that the book did "not parade its erudition" and suggested that it was "consistently on the side of the angels." [20] Paul Ballard described Analogy as "extremely well informed and researched," as "comprehensive," and as "rich, sensitive and insightful." Ballard evaluated the book's "style of presentation" as "remarkably lucid and jargon free" and as "spare, simple, direct and logical, cutting to the heart of a discussion." [21] Mike Higton of the University of Durham observes that "Chartier draws on impressively wide reading in the modern secondary literature . . . ." While unconvinced by Chartier's depiction of God as a moral agent, and evidently doubtful about his greater reliance on contemporary than on biblical or classical sources, Higton suggests that "his insistence on coming back again and again to love is salutary, and the book as a whole issues a thought-provoking challenge to take love seriously in every domain of theology." [22]

Selected publications

Authored books

Edited books

Related Research Articles

Anarchism is a political philosophy and movement that is skeptical of all justifications for authority and seeks to abolish the institutions it claims maintain unnecessary coercion and hierarchy, typically including nation-states, and capitalism. Anarchism advocates for the replacement of the state with stateless societies and voluntary free associations. As a historically left-wing movement, this reading of anarchism is placed on the farthest left of the political spectrum, usually described as the libertarian wing of the socialist movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarcho-capitalism</span> Political philosophy and economic theory

Anarcho-capitalism is an anti-statist, libertarian political philosophy and economic theory that seeks to abolish centralized states in favor of stateless societies with systems of private property enforced by private agencies, based on concepts such as the non-aggression principle, free markets and self-ownership. Anarcho-capitalist philosophy extends the concept of ownership to include control of private property as part of the self, and, in some cases, control of other people as private property. In the absence of statute, anarcho-capitalists hold that society tends to contractually self-regulate and civilize through participation in the free market, which they describe as a voluntary society involving the voluntary exchange of goods and services. In a theoretical anarcho-capitalist society the system of private property would still exist, as it would be enforced by private defense agencies and/or insurance companies that were selected by property owners, whose ownership rights or claims would be enforced by private defence agencies and/or insurance companies. These agencies or companies would operate competitively in a market and fulfill the roles of courts and the police, similar to a state apparatus. Some anarcho-capitalist authors have argued that slavery is compatible with anarcho-capitalist ideals.

Individualist anarchism is the branch of anarchism that emphasizes the individual and their will over external determinants such as groups, society, traditions, and ideological systems. Although usually contrasted with social anarchism, both individualist and social anarchism have influenced each other. Mutualism, an economic theory sometimes considered a synthesis of communism and property, has been considered individualist anarchism and other times part of social anarchism. Many anarcho-communists regard themselves as radical individualists, seeing anarcho-communism as the best social system for the realization of individual freedom. Some anarcho-capitalists claim anarcho-capitalism is part of the individualist anarchist tradition, while others disagree and claim individualist anarchism is only part of the socialist movement and part of the libertarian socialist tradition. Economically, while European individualist anarchists are pluralists who advocate anarchism without adjectives and synthesis anarchism, ranging from anarcho-communist to mutualist economic types, most American individualist anarchists of the 19th century advocated mutualism, a libertarian socialist form of market socialism, or a free-market socialist form of classical economics. Individualist anarchists are opposed to property that violates the entitlement theory of justice, that is, gives privilege due to unjust acquisition or exchange, and thus is exploitative, seeking to "destroy the tyranny of capital, — that is, of property" by mutual credit.

Individualism is the moral stance, political philosophy, ideology and social outlook that emphasizes the intrinsic worth of the individual. Individualists promote realizing one's goals and desires, valuing independence and self-reliance, and advocating that the interests of the individual should gain precedence over the state or a social group, while opposing external interference upon one's own interests by society or institutions such as the government. Individualism makes the individual its focus, and so starts "with the fundamental premise that the human individual is of primary importance in the struggle for liberation".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Market anarchism</span> Branch of anarchism advocating free-market systems

Market anarchism, also known as free-market anti-capitalism, is the branch of anarchism that advocates a free-market economic system based on voluntary interactions without the involvement of the state. A form of individualist anarchism and libertarian socialism, it is based on the economic theories of mutualism and individualist anarchism in the United States.

The nature of capitalism is criticized by left-wing anarchists, who reject hierarchy and advocate stateless societies based on non-hierarchical voluntary associations. Anarchism is generally defined as the libertarian philosophy which holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary and harmful as well as opposing authoritarianism, illegitimate authority and hierarchical organization in the conduct of human relations. Capitalism is generally considered by scholars to be an economic system that includes private ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit or income, the accumulation of capital, competitive markets, voluntary exchange and wage labor, which have generally been opposed by most anarchists historically. Since capitalism is variously defined by sources and there is no general consensus among scholars on the definition nor on how the term should be used as a historical category, the designation is applied to a variety of historical cases, varying in time, geography, politics and culture.

Kevin Carson is an American political writer and blogger. While he originally identified as a mutualist, he now describes himself as an anarchist without adjectives. He works as a Senior Fellow and Karl Hess Chair in Social Theory at the Center for a Stateless Society. Carson coined the pejorative term "vulgar libertarianism" to describe the use of free market rhetoric in defense of corporate capitalism and economic inequality.

Left-libertarianism, also known as left-wing libertarianism, or social libertarianism, is a political philosophy and type of libertarianism that stresses both individual freedom and social equality. Left-libertarianism represents several related yet distinct approaches to political and social theory. Its classical usage refers to anti-authoritarian varieties of left-wing politics such as anarchism, especially social anarchism, communalism, and libertarian Marxism, collectively termed libertarian socialism. A portion of the left wing of the green movement, including adherents of Murray Bookchin's social ecology, are also generally considered left-libertarian.

Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary and harmful as well as opposing authority and hierarchical organization in the conduct of human relations. Proponents of anarchism, known as anarchists, advocate stateless societies based on non-hierarchical voluntary associations. While anarchism holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary and harmful, opposition to the state is not its central or sole definition. Anarchism can entail opposing authority or hierarchy in the conduct of all human relations.

Individualist anarchism in the United States was strongly influenced by Benjamin Tucker, Josiah Warren, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Lysander Spooner, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Max Stirner, Herbert Spencer and Henry David Thoreau. Other important individualist anarchists in the United States were Stephen Pearl Andrews, William Batchelder Greene, Ezra Heywood, M. E. Lazarus, John Beverley Robinson, James L. Walker, Joseph Labadie, Steven Byington and Laurance Labadie.

Christian libertarianism is the synthesis of Christian beliefs with libertarian political philosophy, with a focus on beliefs about free will, human nature, and God-given inalienable rights.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to anarchism:

The following is a list of terms specific to anarchists. Anarchism is a political and social movement which advocates voluntary association in opposition to authoritarianism and hierarchy.

Anarchy is a form of society without rulers. It is primarily advocated by anarchists who propose replacing the state with a stateless society based on voluntary free association. These institutions or free associations are generally modeled to represent concepts such as community and economic self-reliance, interdependence, or individualism. In simple terms anarchy means 'without rulers' or 'without authority'. As such, under anarchy there is no coercive rule by a single group or individual, rather instead by an individual upon themselves or by the people entirely.

Social anarchism, also known as left-wing anarchism or socialist anarchism, is the branch of anarchism that sees liberty and social equality as interrelated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Benjamin Tucker</span> American individualist anarchist (1854–1939)

Benjamin Ricketson Tucker was an American individualist anarchist. Tucker was the editor and publisher of the American individualist anarchist periodical Liberty (1881–1908). Tucker described his form of anarchism as "consistent Manchesterism" and stated that "the Anarchists are simply unterrified Jeffersonian Democrats."

Market socialism is a type of economic system involving social ownership of the means of production within the framework of a market economy. Various models for such a system exist, usually involving cooperative enterprises and sometimes a mix that includes public or private enterprises. In contrast to the majority of historic socialist economies, which have substituted the market mechanism for some form of economic planning, market socialists wish to retain the use of supply and demand signals to guide the allocation of capital goods and the means of production. Under such a system, depending on whether socially owned firms are state-owned or operated as worker cooperatives, profits may variously be used to directly remunerate employees, accrue to society at large as the source of public finance, or be distributed amongst the population in a social dividend.

A classless society is a society in which no one is born into a social class like in a class society. Distinctions of wealth, income, education, culture, or social network might arise and would only be determined by individual experience and achievement in such a society. Thus, the concept posits not the absence of a social hierarchy but the uninheritability of class status. Helen Codere defines social class as a segment of the community, the members of which show a common social position in a hierarchical ranking. Codere suggest that a true class-organized society is one in which the hierarchy of prestige and social status is divisible into groups. Each group with its own social, economic, attitudinal and cultural characteristics, and each having differential degrees of power in community decision.

Anarchism and libertarianism, as broad political ideologies with manifold historical and contemporary meanings, have contested definitions. Their adherents have a pluralistic and overlapping tradition that makes precise definition of the political ideology difficult or impossible, compounded by a lack of common features, differing priorities of subgroups, lack of academic acceptance, and contentious historical usage.

References

  1. Fortress Press, author description, Gary Chartier, ‘’Understanding Friendship’’ (Minneapolis: Fortress 2022) back flap; replicated on the book's Amazon page.
  2. 1 2 3 Chartier, Gary (August 30, 2009). "Getting from There to Here".
  3. 1 2 "Gary Chartier". La Sierra University.
  4. See University of Cambridge, “Higher Doctorates”
  5. Darla Tucker, "Business prof awarded Doctor of Law degree by University of Cambridge," La Sierra University, Dec. 17, 2015.
  6. Reason staff (February 13, 2012) " 'Markets Not Capitalism', Says Professor Gary Chartier", Reason.com
  7. See Gary Chartier, Economic Justice and Natural Law (Cambridge: CUP 2009). This book is principally an exercise in applied ethics, in which differences from other natural law views are more described than defended; it nonetheless addresses some more fundamental theoretical issues. These include the differences between natural law views and others regarding the character of practical reason and the limits of the arguments offered by other natural law theorists regarding the authority of the state.
  8. "Natural Law, Same-Sex Marriage, and the Politics of Virtue," UCLA Law Review 48.6 (Aug. 2001): 1593–1632.
  9. See "Toward a Consistent Natural Law Ethics of False Assertion," American Journal of Jurisprudence 51 (2006): 43–64; "Self-Integration as a Basic Good: A Response to Chris Tollefsen," American Journal of Jurisprudence 52 (2007: 293–296)
  10. 1 2 Leeson, Peter T. (2014). "Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society". Common Knowledge. 20 (3): 505. doi:10.1215/0961754X-2732772. ISSN   0961-754X. S2CID   146824585.
  11. Eric Roark, rev. of Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society, by Gary Chartier, Anarchist Studies 21.2 (2013): 106-7.
  12. Stringham 2014, p. 583.
  13. Aeon J. Skoble, "Is Anarchism Socialist or Capitalist?," rev. of Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society, by Gary Chartier, Reason (Reason Foundation, April 2013).
  14. Skoble 2014, pp. 311–312.
  15. Brennan 2014.
  16. Brennan 2013.
  17. Aligica 2013, p. 241.
  18. Charles Clarke, rev. of Economic Justice and Natural Law, by Gary Chartier, Conversations in Religion and Theology 9.2 (Nov. 2011): 179-87.
  19. The session was chaired by Roderick T. Long. The commentators were David Gordon, Douglas Rasmussen, Douglas Den Uyl, Jennifer Baker, and Kevin Carson. For details, see the Molinari Society's description of the program here.
  20. Timothy Gorringe, rev. of The Analogy of Love, by Gary Chartier, Theology, Sep.-Oct 2008: 384–385.
  21. Paul Ballard, rev. of The Analogy of Love, by Gary Chartier, Theological Book Review 20.1 (2008): 54–55.
  22. Mike Higton, rev. of multiple books including The Analogy of Love, International Journal of Systematic Theology 17.3 (July 2015): 346.
  23. Skoble, Aeon J. (2011). "Rev. of The Conscience of an Anarchist: Why It's Time to Say Good-Bye to the State and Build a Free Society, by Gary Chartier". The Independent Institute. 16 (3).
  24. Aligica, Paul Dragos (2013). "Rev. of Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society". The Review of Austrian Economics. 26 (2): 239–241. doi:10.1007/s11138-013-0203-2. ISSN   1573-7128. S2CID   147870503.
  25. Brennan, Jason (March 10, 2013). "Review of Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society". Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. ISSN   1538-1617.
  26. Brennan, Jason (2014). "Controversial Ethics as a Foundation for Controversial Political Theory" (PDF). Studies in Emergent Order. 7: 299–306. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 27, 2015.
  27. Skoble, Aeon (2014). "Natural Law and Spontaneous Order in the Work of Gary Chartier" (PDF). Studies in Emergent Order. 7: 307–313. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 27, 2015.
  28. Stringham, Edward P. (2014). "Review of Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and politics for a stateless society". Public Choice. 159 (3/4): 581–583. doi:10.1007/s11127-013-0100-z. ISSN   0048-5829. JSTOR   24506439. S2CID   152284968.