Richard Epstein

Last updated
Richard Epstein
Richard Epstein GMU Law WW.jpg
Epstein in 2018
Born
Richard Allen Epstein

(1943-04-17) April 17, 1943 (age 79)
SpouseEileen
Children3
Relatives Paul Reiser (cousin)
Awards

Bradley Prize (2011)
Academic background
Alma mater Columbia University (BA)
Oriel College, Oxford (BA)
Yale University (LLB)

Richard Allen Epstein (born April 17, 1943) is an American legal scholar known for his writings on torts, contracts, property rights, law and economics, classical liberalism, and libertarianism. He is the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law at New York University and the director of the university's Classical Liberal Institute. He also serves as the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and the James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law emeritus and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago.

Contents

According to James W. Ely Jr., Epstein's writings have had a "pervasive influence on American legal thought." [1] In 2000, a study published in The Journal of Legal Studies identified Epstein as the 12th-most cited legal scholar of the 20th century. In 2008, he was chosen in a poll by Legal Affairs as one of the most influential legal thinkers of modern times. A study of legal publications between 2009 and 2013 found Epstein to be the third-most frequently cited American legal scholar during that period (behind only Cass Sunstein and Erwin Chemerinsky).

Early life and education

Epstein was born on April 17, 1943, in Brooklyn, New York. His grandparents were Ashkenazi Jews who immigrated to the United States from Russia and Austria in the early 20th century. Epstein's father, Bernard Epstein (19081978), was a radiologist, and his mother, Catherine Epstein (née Reiser; 19082004), managed his father's medical office. [2] He has two sisters. He attended elementary school at P.S. 161, a school that is now one of the Success Academy Charter Schools. [3] Epstein and his family lived in Brooklyn until 1954, when his father began working at the Long Island Jewish Medical Center and their family moved to Great Neck, Long Island. [3]

Epstein attended Columbia University as an undergraduate in the early 1960s. He had wide-ranging academic interests and did not wish to select a single major, and he obtained special permission from the university to pursue a self-selected program of study across sociology, philosophy, and mathematics. He graduated with a B.A., summa cum laude, in 1964. [4]

Epstein's undergraduate performance earned him a Kellett Fellowship, an award at Columbia that pays for two of each year's top graduates to spend two years in England studying at either Cambridge University or Oxford University. Epstein chose Oxford, where he studied jurisprudence at Oriel College. He received a B.A. with first-class honours in 1966. He then returned to the United States to attend Yale Law School. Because he had an English law degree, Epstein entered Yale Law as a transfer student with second-year standing. [5] He graduated in 1968 with an LL.B., cum laude.

Academic career

After graduating from law school, Epstein became an assistant professor at the University of Southern California's (USC) Gould School of Law. He taught at USC for four years before moving to the University of Chicago Law School in 1972. Epstein taught at Chicago for 38 years, eventually holding the title of James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law. Epstein formally retired from Chicago in 2010, but quickly came out of retirement to join the faculty of the New York University School of Law as its inaugural Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law. He remains a professor emeritus and senior lecturer at Chicago, occasionally teaching courses there. In 2013, NYU Law established a new academic research center, the Classical Liberal Institute, and named Epstein its inaugural director. [6]

Since 2001, Epstein has served as the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, a prominent American public policy think tank at Stanford University. He has served in many academic and public organizations and has received a number of awards. In 1983, he was made a senior fellow at the Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago Medical School, and, in 1985, he was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. [7] He was editor of the Journal of Legal Studies from 1981 to 1991, and of the Journal of Law and Economics from 1991 to 2001. In 2003, Epstein received an honorary LL.D. degree from the University of Ghent, and in 2018 he received an honorary doctorate in law from the University of Siegen. [8] In 2005 the College of William & Mary awarded him the Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize for his contributions to the field of property rights. [9] In 2011, he was awarded a Bradley Prize by the Bradley Foundation. [10]

Writings

Epstein became famous in the American legal community in 1985 with Harvard University Press's publication of his book Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. In it, Epstein argued that the "takings clause" of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which reads, "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation", and is traditionally viewed as a limit on the governmental power of eminent domain gives constitutional protection to citizens' economic rights, [1] and so requires the government to be regarded the same as any other private entity in a property dispute. The argument was controversial and sparked a great deal of debate on the interpretation of the takings clause after the book's publication. During Clarence Thomas's Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearings in 1991, Senator Joe Biden "in a dramatic movement" held the book up and "repeatedly interrogated" Thomas about his position on the book's thesis. [1] The book served as a focal point in the argument about the government's ability to control private property. [11] It has also influenced how some courts view property rights [12] and been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court four times, including in the 1992 case Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council . [11]

At the height of the HIV pandemic in 1988, Epstein argued that companies ought to be able to discriminate against "AIDS carriers" and that anti-discrimination laws were unfair to employers. In place of such laws, Epstein argued that "AIDS carriers" ought to have their health insurance premiums subsidized via taxation so as to "discipline the behavior of government and interests groups, here by requiring citizens to make choices about how much they individually are prepared to pay to subsidize AIDS carriers." Furthermore, he argued that "[t]here is no reason to suppose that any public benefit obtained from having employers and their insurers care for AIDS victims will be at some level that matches the additional costs that are imposed." Instead, Epstein proposed that employers have the right to refuse to hire suspected "AIDS carriers". [13]

Epstein is an advocate of minimal legal regulation. In his 1995 book Simple Rules for a Complex World, he consolidates much of his previous work and argues that simple rules work best because complexities create excessive costs. Complexity comes from attempting to do justice in individual cases. Complex rules are justifiable, however, if they can be opted out of. Drawing on Gary Becker, he argues that the Civil Rights Act and other anti-discrimination legislation ought to be repealed. Consistent with the principles of classical liberalism, he believes that the federal regulation on same-sex marriage, the Defense of Marriage Act, should be repealed, [14] stating:

"Under our law, only the state may issue marriage licenses. That power carries with it a duty to serve all-comers on equal terms, which means that the state should not be able to pick and choose those on whom it bestows its favors. DOMA offends this principle in two ways. First, it excludes polygamous couples from receiving these marital benefits. Second, it excludes gay couples. Both groups contribute to the funds that support these various government programs. Both should share in its benefits."

Epstein has criticized the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges . [15] [16] In 2007, he defended the intellectual property rights of pharmaceutical companies against the cheaper, generic production of AIDS drugs, writing that "disregarding property rights in the name of human rights reduces human welfare around the globe". [17]

In 2014, Epstein argued against reparations for African Americans in a piece published on the Hoover Institution's website. [18]

Contributing to the anthology Our American Story (2019), Epstein addressed the possibility of a shared American narrative. Taking a decidedly skeptical approach, Epstein concluded that no new national narrative can be achieved "unless we engage in what I call American minimalism—a conscious reduction of the issues that we think are truly best handled as a nation and not better address by smaller subnational groups: states, local governments, and, most importantly, all sorts of small private organizations that are free to choose as they please in setting their own membership and mission." [19]

COVID-19 pandemic

In March and April 2020, Epstein wrote several essays published by the Hoover Institution giving a contrarian account of the COVID-19 pandemic and warning against extensive containment and mitigative United States responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, which he called an "overreaction". [20] In a piece published on March 16, he argued that the word "pandemic" is not to be used lightly and that the virus should be allowed to run its course, predicting there would be 500 U.S. deaths. In early June, the U.S. death total surpassed 100,000. [21] On March 24, when U.S. deaths had already exceeded 500, Epstein added a "Correction & Addendum", in which he changed his forecast to 5,000 deaths [22] [23] [24] without changing the underlying model that had led him to his first estimate. [25] On April 6, when the death toll had already far surpassed his earlier predictions, he again revised that figure, with the "Correction & Addendum" section declaring under the inaccurate date stamp "March 24, 2020" that the "original erroneous estimate of 5,000 dead in the US [was] a number 10 times smaller than [he had] intended to state", implying that both "500" and "5,000" had been misprints for "50,000". [26] After several news reports about Epstein's ever-increasing estimates, on April 21 an editor's note appeared on the website that explained the latest changes as an "editing error" and clarified that Epstein's original prediction had been 500 deaths. [27] In December 2020, when the death toll from COVID-19 in the U.S. was over 333,000, Politico named Epstein's predictions among "the most audacious, confident and spectacularly incorrect prognostications about the year". [28]

Epstein compared COVID-19 to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic and suggested that public health measures "are done better at the level of plants, hotels, restaurants, and schools than remotely by political leaders." He argued that "the response of the state governors to the coronavirus outbreak has become far more dangerous than the disease itself", writing that the number of deaths had been exaggerated. [29] His essays, containing a number of factual errors and misconceptions about the SARS-CoV-2 virus, circulated in conservative circles and in the Trump administration upon their publication. [30] [31] In an article published on June 6, Epstein praised Republican-governed states like Florida for their crisis management, linking the then greater deaths in Democratic-governed states to their "interventionist policies". [32]

Influence

Epstein speaks at a conference in George Mason University (2009) Epsteinatgmu.jpg
Epstein speaks at a conference in George Mason University (2009)

In 2006, the American scholar James W. Ely Jr. wrote: "It is a widely accepted premise that Professor Richard A. Epstein has exercised a pervasive influence on American legal thought." [1] In 2000, a study published in The Journal of Legal Studies identified Epstein as the 12th-most cited legal scholar of the entire 20th century. [33] In 2008, he was chosen in a poll taken by Legal Affairs as one of the most influential legal thinkers of modern times. [34] A study of legal publications between 2009 and 2013 found Epstein to be the 3rd most frequently cited American legal scholar, behind only Cass Sunstein and Erwin Chemerinsky. [35]

Politics

Epstein has said that when voting, he chooses "anyone but the Big Two" who are "just two members of the same statist party fighting over whose friends will get favors". [36] He has voted Libertarian. [37] Epstein says he is "certainly a Calvin Coolidge fan; he made some mistakes, but he was a small-government guy". [37] Epstein served on The Constitution Project's Guantanamo Task Force. [38] [39] [40] Epstein has said he thinks Learned Hand should have been on the Supreme Court and that his favorite English judge was Baron Bramwell. [41]

In early 2015, Epstein commented on his relationship to the modern American political landscape, stating: "I'm in this very strange position: I'm not a conservative when it comes to religious values and so forth, but I do believe, in effect, in a strong foreign policy and a relatively small domestic government, but that's not the same thing as saying I believe in no government at all." [42] He has also been characterized as a libertarian conservative. [43] [44] During a debate with Chris Preble in December 2016, Epstein identified himself as being a "libertarian hawk". [45]

Personal life

Epstein's wife, Eileen W. Epstein, is a fundraiser and educator who serves on the board of trustees for the philanthropic organization American Jewish World Service. They have three children: two sons, Benjamin M. and Elliot, and a daughter, Melissa. Epstein is a first cousin of the comedian and actor Paul Reiser. [46]

Epstein, who had a bar mitzvah, [41] has described himself as "a rather weak, non-practicing Jew." [47]

Selected works

Articles

Books

Casebooks

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarcho-capitalism</span> Political philosophy and economic theory

Anarcho-capitalism is an anti-statist, libertarian, and anti-political philosophy and economic theory that seeks to abolish centralized states in favor of stateless societies with systems of private property enforced by private agencies, the non-aggression principle, free markets and the right-libertarian interpretation of self-ownership, which extends the concept to include control of private property as part of the self. In the absence of statute, anarcho-capitalists hold that society tends to contractually self-regulate and civilize through participation in the free market, which they describe as a voluntary society involving the voluntary exchange of services and goods. In a theoretical anarcho-capitalist society, the system of private property would still exist and be enforced by private defense agencies and/or insurance companies selected by customers which would operate competitively in a market and fulfill the roles of courts and the police. The word "anarchy" is the literal antithesis of hierarchy. Therefore, "anarcho-capitalism" is primarily a co-opted term with no philosophical similarities to true anarchism, as an ancap society would inherently contain hierarchy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Sowell</span> American author, economist, and conservative political commentator (born 1930)

Thomas Sowell is an American author, economist, political commentator, social theorist, and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. He was a recipient of the National Humanities Medal from President George W. Bush in 2002.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law and economics</span> Application of economic theory to analysis of legal systems

Law and economics, or economic analysis of law, is the application of microeconomic theory to the analysis of law, which emerged primarily from scholars of the Chicago school of economics. Economic concepts are used to explain the effects of laws, to assess which legal rules are economically efficient, and to predict which legal rules will be promulgated. There are two major branches of law and economics; one based on the application of the methods and theories of neoclassical economics to the positive and normative analysis of the law, and a second branch which focuses on an institutional analysis of law and legal institutions, with a broader focus on economic, political, and social outcomes, and overlapping with analyses of the institutions of politics and governance.

Some philosophers distinguish two types of rights, natural rights and legal rights.

Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that a New York state law setting maximum working hours for bakers violated the bakers' right to freedom of contract under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The decision has been effectively overturned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University of Chicago Law School</span> Law school in Chicago, US

The University of Chicago Law School is the law school of the University of Chicago, a private research university in Chicago, Illinois. It is consistently ranked among the best and most prestigious law schools in the world, and has many distinguished alumni in the judiciary, academia, government, politics and business. It employs more than 180 full-time and part-time faculty and hosts more than 600 students in its Juris Doctor program, while also offering the Master of Laws, Master of Studies in Law and Doctor of Juridical Science degrees in law. The law school has the highest percentage of recent graduates clerking for federal judges.

<i>Restoring the Lost Constitution</i> Book by Randy Barnett

Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty is a 2003 book about the United States Constitution written by Randy Barnett, a professor of law at the Georgetown University Law Center. In the book, Barnett outlines his theory of constitutional legitimacy, interpretation, and construction. He argues that the Constitution should be interpreted by its "original meaning", distinct from the Founding Fathers' original intent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cass Sunstein</span> American legal scholar, writer, blogger

Cass Robert Sunstein is an American legal scholar known for his studies of constitutional law, administrative law, environmental law, law and behavioral economics. He is also The New York Times best-selling author of The World According to Star Wars (2016) and Nudge (2008). He was the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration from 2009 to 2012.

Stephen Fain Williams was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit until his death from complications of COVID-19 on August 7, 2020.

The Lochner era is a period in American legal history from 1897 to 1937 in which the Supreme Court of the United States is said to have made it a common practice "to strike down economic regulations adopted by a State based on the Court's own notions of the most appropriate means for the State to implement its considered policies". The court did this by using its interpretation of substantive due process to strike down laws held to be infringing on economic liberty or private contract rights. The era takes its name from a 1905 case, Lochner v. New York. The beginning of the era is usually marked earlier, with the Court's decision in Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897), and its end marked forty years later in the case of West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937), which overturned an earlier Lochner-era decision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeremy Waldron</span> New Zealand lawyer

Jeremy Waldron is a New Zealand professor of law and philosophy. He holds a University Professorship at the New York University School of Law, is affiliated with the New York University Department of Philosophy, and was formerly the Chichele Professor of Social and Political Theory at All Souls College, Oxford University. Waldron also holds an adjunct professorship at Victoria University of Wellington. Waldron is regarded as one of the world's leading legal and political philosophers.

The non-aggression principle (NAP), also called the non-aggression axiom, is a concept in which aggression, defined as initiating or threatening any forceful interference against either an individual, their property or against promises (contracts) for which the aggressor is liable and in which the individual is a counterparty, is inherently wrong. There is no single or universal interpretation or definition of the NAP, with different definitions varying in regards to how to treat intellectual property, force, abortion, and other topics.

Libertarian paternalism is the idea that it is both possible and legitimate for private and public institutions to affect behavior while also respecting freedom of choice, as well as the implementation of that idea. The term was coined by behavioral economist Richard Thaler and legal scholar Cass Sunstein in a 2003 article in the American Economic Review. The authors further elaborated upon their ideas in a more in-depth article published in the University of Chicago Law Review that same year. They propose that libertarian paternalism is paternalism in the sense that "it tries to influence choices in a way that will make choosers better off, as judged by themselves" ; note and consider, the concept paternalism specifically requires a restriction of choice. It is libertarian in the sense that it aims to ensure that "people should be free to opt out of specified arrangements if they choose to do so". The possibility to opt out is said to "preserve freedom of choice". Thaler and Sunstein published Nudge, a book-length defense of this political doctrine, in 2008.

Libertarian conservatism, also referred to as conservative libertarianism and conservatarianism, is a political and social philosophy that combines conservatism and libertarianism, representing the libertarian wing of conservatism and vice versa.

William H. "Chip" Mellor is the chairman of the board of directors for the Institute for Justice and its former founder, President, and General Counsel. During his career as the Institute's General Counsel, Mellor pursued constitutional litigation in four areas: economic liberty, property rights, school choice, and free speech.

Consequentialist libertarianism, also known as consequentialist liberalism or libertarian consequentialism, is a libertarian political philosophy and position that is supportive of a free market and strong private property rights only on the grounds that they bring about favorable consequences such as prosperity or efficiency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Pildes</span> American legal scholar

Richard H. Pildes is the Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the New York University School of Law and a leading expert on constitutional law, the Supreme Court, the system of government in the United States, and legal issues concerning the structure of democracy, including election law. He is one of the nation's leading scholars of public law and a specialist in legal issues affecting democracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Walter E. Williams</span> American economist (1936–2020)

Walter Edward Williams was an American economist, commentator, and academic. Williams was the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University, as well as a syndicated columnist and author. Known for his classical liberal and libertarian views, Williams's writings frequently appeared in Townhall, WND, and Jewish World Review. Williams was also a popular guest host of the Rush Limbaugh radio show when Limbaugh was unavailable.

The Brigham–Kanner Property Rights Prize is awarded each Fall by the William & Mary Law School, at the Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference. The Conference and Prize were proposed in 2003 by Joseph T. Waldo, a graduate of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law with the support of the then Dean of the Law School, W. Taylor Reveley, III, who would later become President of the College. The Conference and Prize were inaugurated in 2004. The Conference and Prize are named after Toby Prince Brigham and Gideon Kanner for "their contributions to private property rights, their efforts to advance the constitutional protection of property, and their accomplishments in preserving the important role that private property plays in protecting individual and civil rights." Toby Prince Brigham is a founding partner of Brigham Moore in Florida. Gideon Kanner is professor of law emeritus at the Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. The Brigham-Kanner Prize is awarded annually during the Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ilya Somin</span> American law professor (born 1973)

Ilya Somin is a law professor at George Mason University, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, a blogger for the Volokh Conspiracy, and a former co-editor of the Supreme Court Economic Review (2006–2013). His research focuses on constitutional law, property law, migration rights, and the study of popular political participation and its implications for constitutional democracy.

References

Footnotes
  1. 1 2 3 4 Ely (2006), p. 421.
  2. Frey (2009).
  3. 1 2 Troy Senik; Richard Epstein (July 29, 2015). "The Education of a Libertarian". The Libertarian Podcast (Podcast). Hoover Institution. Retrieved September 6, 2015.{{cite podcast}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. Hannemann, Benjamin. "Richard A. Epstein". www.bradleyfdn.org. Retrieved July 27, 2020.
  5. Raskin, Max (February 15, 2021). "Interview with Richard Epstein". MaxRaskin.com. Retrieved September 19, 2021.
  6. "Classical Liberal Institute launched at conference on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac". NYU School of Law. September 20, 2013. Retrieved July 12, 2015.
  7. Richard A. Epstein, University of Chicago.
  8. "Universität Siegen zeichnet Richard A. Epstein aus" (in German). Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  9. "Hoover Fellow Richard A. Epstein Honored With Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize From College of William and Mary Law School". Hoover.org.
  10. Recipients – The Bradley Prizes
  11. 1 2 "News & Media | University of Chicago Law School". www.law.uchicago.edu.
  12. Steve Chapman (April 1995). "Takings Exception". Reason. Retrieved October 26, 2008.
  13. Epstein, Dick. "AIDS, Testing and the Workplace". University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1988: 33–56.
  14. Richard A. Epstein (July 12, 2010). "Judicial Offensive Against Defense Of Marriage Act". Forbes. Retrieved September 6, 2010.
  15. Richard A. Epstein (June 29, 2015). "Hard Questions On Same-Sex Marriage". Hoover Institution. Retrieved January 3, 2018.
  16. Mark Joseph Stern (July 2, 2015). "Richard Epstein on Obergefell". Slate.
  17. "AIDS drugs: Are property rights and human rights in conflict?". Financial Times. May 15, 2007.
  18. "The Case Against Reparations for Slavery". Hoover Institution. Retrieved February 23, 2022.
  19. Claybourn, Joshua, ed. (2019). Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative. Lincoln, NE: Potomac Books. pp. 175–188. ISBN   978-1640121706.
  20. Richard A. Epstein (March 23, 2020). "Coronavirus Overreaction". Hoover Institution. Retrieved March 29, 2020.
  21. "Coronavirus USA Cases Deaths". Washington Post. June 1, 2020.
  22. Heer, Jeet (March 30, 2020). "All the President's Crackpots". The Nation. ISSN   0027-8378 . Retrieved April 2, 2020.
  23. Coaston, Jane (March 31, 2020). "The legal scholar who shaped Trump's coronavirus response defends his theory". Vox. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
  24. Richard A. Epstein (March 16, 2020). "Coronavirus Perspective". Hoover Institution. Retrieved March 29, 2020.
  25. Douglass, Rex W. (March 30, 2020). "How to be Curious Instead of Contrarian About COVID-19: Eight Data Science Lessons From 'Coronavirus Perspective' (Epstein 2020)" . Retrieved April 26, 2020.
  26. Masnick, Mike (April 22, 2020). "Famed Law Professor Richard Epstein's Ever Changing Claims About How Many People Will Die From COVID-19". Techdirt . Retrieved April 26, 2020.
  27. Richard A. Epstein (March 16, 2020). "Coronavirus Perspective". Hoover Institution. Retrieved April 26, 2020.
  28. Stanton, Zack (December 29, 2020). "The Worst Predictions of 2020". Politico . Retrieved December 30, 2020.
  29. "Richard Epstein Can't Stop Being Wrong About the Coronavirus". April 21, 2020.
  30. Isaac Chotiner (March 30, 2020). "The Contrarian Coronavirus Theory That Informed the Trump Administration". The New yorker. Retrieved April 10, 2020.
  31. "Trump weighs restarting economy despite warnings from U.S. public health officials". The Washington Post. 2020.
  32. Richard A. Epstein (June 6, 2020). "Red state, blue state". Las Vegas Review-Journal . Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  33. Shapiro, Fred R. (2000). "The Most-Cited Legal Scholars". Journal of Legal Studies. 29 (1): 409–26. doi:10.1086/468080. S2CID   143676627.
  34. 2014 Scholarly Impact – Leitner Rankings.
  35. "Richard Epstein lays down the law". www.chicagomaroon.com. Retrieved April 15, 2020.
  36. 1 2 "Who's Getting Your Vote?". Reason. November 2004. Retrieved October 27, 2008.
  37. "Task Force members" (PDF). The Constitution Project. December 17, 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 25, 2011. Retrieved June 11, 2015.
  38. "Task Force on Detainee Treatment Launched". The Constitution Project. December 17, 2010. Archived from the original on December 15, 2010.
  39. "Think tank plans study of how US treats detainees". Wall Street Journal . December 17, 2010. Archived from the original on December 18, 2010.
  40. 1 2 "Interview with Richard Epstein". Interviews with Max Raskin. Retrieved July 1, 2021.
  41. "Special Edition: Epstein and Levin on Progressivism, Classical Liberalism, and Conservatism", The Libertarian Podcast, Hoover Institution, February 4, 2015.
  42. Piper, J. Richard (1997). Ideologies and Institutions: American Conservative and Liberal Governance Prescriptions Since 1933. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN   978-0847684595.
  43. "Defining Richard Epstein: A renowned libertarian takes on a new mantle | NYU School of Law". www.law.nyu.edu. Retrieved October 7, 2016.
  44. "U.S. Involvement in War | C-SPAN.org". www.c-span.org.
  45. "The Chicken or the Egg?". February 13, 2014.
  46. Troy Senik, Richard Epstein (March 31, 2015). "Indiana, Discrimination, and Religious Liberty". The Libertarian (Podcast). Hoover Institution . Retrieved April 11, 2015.
Works cited

Further reading