Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property

Last updated

Libertarians have differing opinions on the validity of intellectual property. Most left-libertarians oppose it whereas among right-libertarians and Libertarian parties there is more nuance, ranging from strong opposition to neutrality and support (particularly from those who are influenced by Ayn Rand's views).

Contents

Left-libertarianism

Most left-libertarians, dating back to Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (a libertarian socialist who is considered "the father of anarchism"), oppose intellectual property as part of their broad criticism of capitalism and anti-capitalism. [1] Benjamin Tucker, a 19th-century American individualist anarchist opposing intellectual property, argued that "the patent monopoly consists in protecting inventors against competition for a period long enough to extort from the people a reward enormously in excess of the labor measure of their services, in other words, in giving certain people a right of property for a term of years in laws and facts of Nature, and the power to exact tribute from others for the use of this natural wealth, which should be open to all." [2] Lysander Spooner, another 19th-century American individualist anarchist or left-libertarian who also influenced right-libertarians, argued for some forms of intellectual property, [3] while Henry George distinguished between patents and copyrights. [3]

Into the 21st century, Roderick T. Long argues that the concept of intellectual property is not libertarian. He holds that prohibiting people from using, reproducing, and trading copyrighted material is an infringement of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and that since information exists in people's minds and other people's property, one cannot own information without owning other people. Arguing that authors and publishers would continue to produce absent copyright protection, he cites the fact that hundreds of thousands of articles are uploaded onto the Internet by their authors every day, available to anyone in the world for free and that nearly all works written before the 20th century are in the public domain, yet pre-1900 works are still published and sold. [4] [5]

Right-libertarianism

Anarcho-capitalists oppose the existence of even a minimal state. This ideological framework requires that any functions served by intellectual property law promulgation and enforcement be provided through private sector institutions. Murray Rothbard argued for allowing contractually arising infinite copyright terms and against the need for any government role in protecting intellectual property. [6] Rothbard states that government's involvement in defining arbitrary limits on the duration and scope of intellectual property in order to "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" is inherently problematic, saying: "By what standard do you judge that research expenditures are 'too much,' 'too little,' or just about enough?" [7] Thus, he argued that intellectual property laws can actually hinder innovation since competitors can be indefinitely discouraged from further research expenditures in the general area covered by the patent because the courts may hold their improvements as infringements on the previous patent and the patent holder is discouraged from engaging in further research in this field because the privilege discourages improvement of their invention for the entire period of the patent, with the assurance that no competitor can trespass on their domain. [7]

Morris and Linda Tannehill proposed that ideas in the form of inventions could be registered in a privately owned "data bank". The inventor could then buy insurance against the theft and unauthorized commercial use of the invention and the insurance company would guarantee to not only compensate the inventor for any losses suffered due to such infringement but to stop such unauthorized use. [8] Opponents to intellectual property rights include Wendy McElroy, [9] Tom G. Palmer, [10] Henri Lepage, Boudewijn Bouckaert, Jeffrey Tucker, and Stephan Kinsella. [11] Kinsella observes in Against Intellectual Property that patents may be inefficient since they divert resources from research and development to patent filing and lawsuits. He writes that theoretical research can not be patented as easily as practical research and thus theoretical research is relatively underfunded. Moreover, he argues that property rights can only apply to resources that are scarce, which intellectual property is not. Kinsella also states that the only way that intellectual property rights can be implemented is by limiting others' physical property rights. [12] David D. Friedman takes a neutral stance on intellectual property, arguing that "there are good arguments on both sides of that question". [13] J. Neil Schulman instead argued in favor of intellectual property. [3]

Ayn Rand

Ayn Rand, the founder of Objectivism who herself was not a libertarian but who had a significant influence on Rothbard (prior to his department from her philosophical studies circle) and other right-libertarians, supported copyrights and patents. [14] In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal , she wrote:

Patents and copyrights are the legal implementation of the base of all property rights: a man's right to the product of his mind. Every type of productive work involves a combination of mental and of physical effort: of thought and of physical action to translate that thought into a material form. The proportion of these two elements varies in different types of work. At the lowest end of the scale, the mental effort required to perform unskilled manual labor is minimal. At the other end, what the patent and copyright laws acknowledge is the paramount role of mental effort in the production of material values; these laws protect the mind's contribution in its purest form the origination of an idea. The subject of patents and copyrights is intellectual property. ... Thus the law establishes the property right of a mind to that which it has brought in existence. [14]

Rand held that patent should be granted for limited terms only. [15] She wrote:

If it were held in perpetuity, it would lead to the opposite of the very principle on which it is based: it would lead, not to the earned reward of achievement, but to the unearned support of parasitism. It would become a cumulative lien on the production of unborn generations, which would ultimately paralyze them. Consider what would happen if, in producing an automobile, we had to pay royalties to the descendants of all the inventors involved, starting with the inventor of the wheel and on up. Apart from the impossibility of keeping such records, consider the accidental status of such descendants and the unreality of their unearned claims. [15]

Libertarian political parties

The Libertarian Party of Canada takes "a moderate approach to patents and copyrights", calling for "a careful review of existing and proposed legislation". [16] The Libertarian Party of Russia writes in its platform that "intellectual property" is a privilege granted by the state. Accordingly, "intellectual property rights" are enforced by the state through violence. On this basis, it writes in its program that it intends to repeal the section of the Civil Code of Russia, as well as the articles of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses and Criminal Code of Russia that provide for sanctions for infringement of "intellectual property rights". [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarcho-capitalism</span> Political philosophy and economic theory

Anarcho-capitalism is a political philosophy and economic theory according to which all government institutions are unnecessary or harmful and can be abolished or replaced by private ones. Anarcho-capitalists hold that society tends to contractually self-regulate and civilize through the voluntary exchange of goods and services. This would ideally result in a voluntary society based on concepts such as the non-aggression principle, free markets and self-ownership. In such a society, private property rights would be enforced by private agencies. In the absence of statute private defence agencies and/or insurance companies would operate competitively in a market and fulfill the roles of courts and the police.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intellectual property</span> Ownership of creative expressions and processes

Intellectual property (IP) is a category of property that includes intangible creations of the human intellect. There are many types of intellectual property, and some countries recognize more than others. The best-known types are patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. The modern concept of intellectual property developed in England in the 17th and 18th centuries. The term "intellectual property" began to be used in the 19th century, though it was not until the late 20th century that intellectual property became commonplace in most of the world's legal systems.

Individualist anarchism is the branch of anarchism that emphasizes the individual and their will over external determinants such as groups, society, traditions, and ideological systems. Although usually contrasted with social anarchism, both individualist and social anarchism have influenced each other. Some anarcho-capitalists claim anarcho-capitalism is part of the individualist anarchist tradition, while others disagree and reject the notion that anarcho-capitalism is a genuinely anarchist belief system or movement. Economically, while European individualist anarchists are generally pluralists who advocate anarchism without adjectives and synthesis anarchism, ranging from anarcho-communist to mutualist economic types, most American individualist anarchists of the 19th century advocated mutualism, a libertarian socialist form of market socialism, or a free-market socialist form of classical economics. Individualist anarchists are opposed to property that violates the entitlement theory of justice, that is, gives privilege due to unjust acquisition or exchange, and thus is exploitative, seeking to "destroy the tyranny of capital,—that is, of property" by mutual credit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murray Rothbard</span> American economist (1926–1995)

Murray Newton Rothbard was an American economist of the Austrian School, economic historian, political theorist, and activist. Rothbard was a central figure in the 20th-century American libertarian movement, particularly its right-wing strands, and was a founder and leading theoretician of anarcho-capitalism. He wrote over twenty books on political theory, history, economics, and other subjects.

<i>The Machinery of Freedom</i> 1973 nonfiction book by David D. Friedman

The Machinery of Freedom is a nonfiction book by David D. Friedman that advocates an anarcho-capitalist society from a consequentialist perspective.

The Ludwig von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics, or Mises Institute, is a nonprofit think tank headquartered in Auburn, Alabama, that is a center for Austrian economics, right-wing libertarian thought and the paleolibertarian and anarcho-capitalist movements in the United States. It is named after the economist Ludwig von Mises (1881–1973) and promotes the Misesian version of heterodox Austrian economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Libertarian theories of law</span> Aspect of jurisprudence

Libertarian theories of law build upon classical liberal and individualist doctrines.

The nature of capitalism is criticized by left-wing anarchists, who reject hierarchy and advocate stateless societies based on non-hierarchical voluntary associations. Anarchism is generally defined as the libertarian philosophy which holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary and harmful as well as opposing authoritarianism, illegitimate authority and hierarchical organization in the conduct of human relations. Capitalism is generally considered by scholars to be an economic system that includes private ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit or income, the accumulation of capital, competitive markets, voluntary exchange and wage labor, which have generally been opposed by most anarchists historically. Since capitalism is variously defined by sources and there is no general consensus among scholars on the definition nor on how the term should be used as a historical category, the designation is applied to a variety of historical cases, varying in time, geography, politics and culture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Objectivism and libertarianism</span> Philosophical interactions

Ayn Rand's philosophy of Objectivism has been, and continues to be, a major influence on the right-libertarian movement, particularly libertarianism in the United States. Many right-libertarians justify their political views using aspects of Objectivism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-aggression principle</span> Core concept in libertarianism

The Non-Aggression Principle (NAP) is a concept in which "aggression" – defined as initiating or threatening any forceful interference with an individual, their property or their agreements (contracts) – is illegitimate and should be prohibited. Interpretations of the NAP vary, particularly concerning issues like intellectual property, force, and abortion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephan Kinsella</span> American lawyer

Norman Stephan Kinsella is an American patent attorney, author, and deontological anarcho-capitalist. His legal works have been published by Oxford University Press, Oceana Publications, Mises Institute, Quid Pro Books and others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Propertarianism</span> Legal theory of property rights

Propertarianism, or proprietarianism, is a political philosophy that reduces all questions of law to the right to own property. On property rights, it advocates private property based on Lockean sticky property norms, where an owner keeps their property more or less until they consent to gift or sell it, rejecting the Lockean proviso. Propertarianism is often described by its advocates as either synonymous with capitalism or its logical conclusion.

Libertarianism is a political philosophy that holds freedom and liberty as primary values. Many libertarians conceive of freedom in accord with the Non-Aggression Principle, according to which each individual has the right to live as they choose, so long as it does not involve violating the rights of others by initiating force or fraud against them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Libertarianism in the United States</span> Origin, history and development of libertarianism in the United States

In the United States, libertarianism is a political philosophy promoting individual liberty. According to common meanings of conservatism and liberalism in the United States, libertarianism has been described as conservative on economic issues and liberal on personal freedom, though this is disputed. The movement is often associated with a foreign policy of non-interventionism. Broadly, there are four principal traditions within libertarianism, namely the libertarianism that developed in the mid-20th century out of the revival tradition of classical liberalism in the United States after liberalism associated with the New Deal; the libertarianism developed in the 1950s by anarcho-capitalist author Murray Rothbard, who based it on the anti-New Deal Old Right and 19th-century libertarianism and American individualist anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner while rejecting the labor theory of value in favor of Austrian School economics and the subjective theory of value; the libertarianism developed in the 1970s by Robert Nozick and founded in American and European classical liberal traditions; and the libertarianism associated with the Libertarian Party, which was founded in 1971, including politicians such as David Nolan and Ron Paul.

Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism, or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political philosophy that supports capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of natural resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property and capital from left-libertarianism, a variant of libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to property and income. In contrast to socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports free-market capitalism. Like most forms of libertarianism, it supports civil liberties, especially natural law, negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a significant transformation of the modern welfare state.

<i>For a New Liberty</i> 1973 book by Murray Rothbard

For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto is a book by American economist and historian Murray Rothbard, in which the author promotes anarcho-capitalism. The work has been credited as an influence on modern libertarian thought and on part of the New Right.

Libertarianism is variously defined by sources as there is no general consensus among scholars on the definition nor on how one should use the term as a historical category. Scholars generally agree that libertarianism refers to the group of political philosophies which emphasize freedom, individual liberty and voluntary association. Libertarians generally advocate a society with little or no government power.

This article is a list of major figures in the theory of libertarianism, a philosophy asserting that individuals have a right to be free. Originally coined by French anarchist and libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque as an alternative synonymous to anarchism, American classical liberals appropriated the term in the 1950s for their philosophy which asserts that individuals have a right to acquire, keep and exchange their holdings and that the primary purpose of government is to protect these rights. As a result of this history, libertarians on this list may be either of the American-style free-market variety or of the European-style socialist variety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Walter Block</span> American born Austrian School economist (born 1941)

Walter Edward Block is an American Austrian School economist and anarcho-capitalist theorist. He was the Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair in Economics at the School of Business at Loyola University New Orleans and a former senior fellow of the non-profit think-tank Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to libertarianism:

References

  1. McKay, Iain, ed. (2008). "Section B – Why do anarchists oppose the current system?". An Anarchist FAQ. Edinburgh: AK Press. ISBN   978-1-84935-122-5. Archived from the original on December 8, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2025 via Google Books.
  2. Tucker, Benjamin (1893). Instead of a Book, By a Man Too Busy to Write One: A Fragmentary Exposition of Philosophical Anarchism. New York. p. 13. Retrieved January 17, 2025 via Google Books.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. 1 2 3 Kinsella, Stephan, ed. (2023). The Anti-IP Reader: Free Market Critiques of Intellectual Property. Houston: Papinian Press. Retrieved January 17, 2025. In "Classical Liberals and Anarchists on Intellectual Property", Kinsella lists anarchists, classical liberals, anarcho-capitalists, and American libertarians and their positions on intellectual property. In "Pro-IP "Anarchists" and anti-IP Patent Attorneys", Kinsella lists further anarcho-capitalists in favor of intellectual property. For further discussion of the views of various libertarians on this matter, see his "Anti-IP Resources", "The Four Historical Phases of IP Abolitionism", and "The Origins of Libertarian IP Abolitionism".
  4. Long, Roderik T. (September 14, 2002). "The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property Rights". Libertarian Nation. Archived from the original on September 14, 2002. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  5. Steelman, Aaron (2008). "Intellectual Property". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. pp.  249250. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n220. ISBN   978-1412965804. LCCN   2008009151. OCLC   750831024 . Retrieved January 17, 2025 via Google Books.
  6. Rothbard, Murray (2009). "Chapter 3. Triangular Intervention". Man, Economy, and State, with Power and Market. Mises Institute. ISBN   978-1-933550-27-5. Archived from the original on September 29, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  7. 1 2 Rothbard, Murray (2009). "Chapter 10. Monopoly and Competition". Man, Economy, and State, with Power and Market. Mises Institute. ISBN   978-1-933550-27-5. Archived from the original on November 27, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  8. Tannehill, Morris; Tannehill, Linda (1993). "Property: The Great Problem Solver". The Market for Liberty. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes. pp.  5859. ISBN   978-1-610163-95-8 . Retrieved January 17, 2025 via Google Books.
  9. McElroy, Wendy (2011). "Contra Copyright, Again" (PDF). Libertarian Papers. 3 (12). Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  10. Palmer, Tom G. (1990). "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects" (PDF). Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. 13 (3). doi:10.1515/9780295803661-009 . Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  11. Bouillon, Hardy (2009). "A Note on Intellectual Property and Externalities". In Hülsmann, Jörg Guido; Kinsella, Stephan (eds.). Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (PDF). Mises Institute. p. 157. ISBN   978-1-933550-52-7 . Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  12. Kinsella, Stephan (2008). Against Intellectual Property (PDF). Mises Institute. ISBN   978-1-933550-32-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 16, 2014. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  13. Wile, Anthony (April 8, 2012). "David D. Friedman on his Famous Father, Anarcho-Capitalism and Free-Market Solutions". The Daily Bell. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  14. 1 2 Rand, Ayn (1966). Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (1st ed.). New York: New American Library. p.  125. ISBN   978-0-451-14795-0 . Retrieved January 17, 2025 via Google Books.
  15. 1 2 Rand, Ayn (1966). Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (1st ed.). New York: New American Library. p.  127. ISBN   978-0-451-14795-0 . Retrieved January 17, 2025 via Google Books.
  16. "Platform Of The Libertarian Party Of Canada". Libertarian Party of Canada. 2012. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
  17. "Programma Politicheskoy partii Libertarianskaya partiya Rossii" Программа Политической партии Либертарианская партия России [Program of the Political Party Libertarian Party of Russia](PDF) (in Russian). Libertarian Party of Russia. October 31, 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 30, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2025.