Left-libertarianism

Last updated

Left-libertarianism, [1] also known as left-wing libertarianism, [2] is a political philosophy and type of libertarianism that stresses both individual freedom and social equality. Left-libertarianism represents several related yet distinct approaches to political and social theory. Its classical usage refers to anti-authoritarian varieties of left-wing politics such as anarchism, especially social anarchism. [3]

Contents

While right-libertarianism is widely seen as synonymous with libertarianism in the United States, left-libertarianism is the predominant form of libertarianism in Europe. [4] In the United States, left-libertarianism is the term used for the left wing of the libertarian movement, [3] including the political positions associated with academic philosophers Hillel Steiner, Philippe Van Parijs, and Peter Vallentyne that combine self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural resources. [5] Although libertarianism in the United States has become associated with classical liberalism and minarchism, with right-libertarianism being more known than left-libertarianism, [6] political usage of the term libertarianism until then was associated exclusively with anti-capitalism, libertarian socialism, and social anarchism; in most parts of the world, such an association still predominates. [3] [7]

Left-libertarians are skeptical of, or fully against, private ownership of natural resources, arguing, in contrast to right-libertarians, that neither claiming nor mixing one's labor with natural resources is enough to generate full private property rights, and they maintain that natural resources should be held in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively. [8] Those left-libertarians who are more lenient towards private property support different property norms and theories, such as usufruct [9] or under the condition that recompense is offered to the local or even global community. [10] [11]

Like other forms of libertarianism, left-libertarian views on the state range from minarchism, which argues for a decentralised and limited government, to anarchism, which advocates for the state to be abolished entirely. [12]

Terminology

Libertarianism is a philosophy that advocates for freedom, whether political, economical or metaphysical. [13] Although older political movements have been identified as libertarian (for example, Marxist historian E.P. Thompson argued in 1979 that "the English left-libertarian tradition can be traced back to the Levellers, Diggers and the Chartists" [14] ), the political definition of the term "libertarian" (from the French : libertaire) was coined by the French anarchist communist Joseph Déjacque in 1857, whereafter libertarianism became synonymous with anarchism. [15] The term was widely used by anarchists until the 1970s, when libertarianism first started to be associated with a radical free market philosophy, particularly in the United States. [16] [17]

The oldest, traditional, definition of "left-libertarianism" used it synonymously with social anarchism. [18] Seeking to distinguish themselves from the new generation of free-market libertarians, social anarchists began referring to themselves as "left-libertarians", [19] while the new adoptees of the term became known as "right-libertarians". [20] This usage is also applied to libertarian socialists such as William Morris or Fenner Brockway [21] [22] and libertarian Marxists such as Cornelius Castoriadis. [23]

At the same time as social anarchists began using the term to distinguish themselves from free-market libertarians, some of the advocates of free market economics that were associated with the New Left, including Roy Childs and Samuel Konkin, also began referring to themselves as "left-libertarians" in order to highlight themselves as the left-wing of the new free-market libertarian movement. [13] As anti-capitalist advocates of free-market economics, they used the term "left-libertarian" in order to distinguish themselves from the right-wing advocates of libertarian capitalism. [24]

Left libertarianism is defined a little differently by many European political scientists, in a usage introduced by Herbert Kitschelt in 1989. [25] [26] Left libertarian parties emphasise notions of internal party democracy and bottom-up participation. [27] [28] Green parties and radical left parties are often grouped together as "left-libertarian" parties by political scientists. [29] [30] [31]

For political scientists Jan Jämte and Adrienne Sörbom,

The term radical left-libertarianism is used as an umbrella concept, gathering different strands of anti-authoritarian forms of socialism, stressing both anti-capitalist and anti-statist views, as well as the need to build a society based on voluntary forms of cooperation. Presently, such movements also often articulate strong criticism of what are seen as other forms of oppression, such as sexism, racism and homophobia, thus making the movements potential allies to a wider section of movement cultures. The anarchist ideology and movement are firmly rooted within this broad ideational category, together with other branches of left-libertarianism such as council communism, anarcho-syndicalism or autonomism. [32]

The term "radical left-libertarian movements" (RLLMs) is used by many political scientists to refer to anarchists, autonomists and others in the alternative cultures and movements that arose out of the new social movements from the 1960s onwards, such as those involved in squatting and militant anti-fascism. [33] [34] [35] [36] For example, in a comparative study of left libertarianism in Sweden and Poland, Piotrowski and Wennerhag state that

activists from anarchist, autonomist, and anarcho-syndicalist groups, whose political orientations include both libertarian Marxist and anarchist perspectives,… are the principal actors within the radical left-libertarian movement in the countries of our study. All of these groups are based on ideologies that express anti-capitalist, anti-authoritarian/anti-state, anti-racist/antifascist and pro-direct/participatory democracy stances from a radical left-libertarian standpoint (Katsiaficas 1997; Curran 2006; Romanos 2013). Historically, such movement activism can be connected to those ideologies and strategies that emerged within two broader "movement families" (cf. della Porta and Rucht 1995, 230 ff.): namely, the labor movement (in particular during the late 19th and early 20th century) and the "new left" or "new social movements" of the 1960s and onwards. Within these movement families, the groups we analyze here have often been thought to constitute the "radical flank" (cf. Haines 2013). [37]

According to sociologist Jennifer Carlson, left-libertarianism is one of the three main branches of libertarian political philosophy, alongside right-libertarianism, a capitalist philosophy that defends strong private property rights; and socialist libertarianism, an anti-capitalist philosophy that opposes the concentration of wealth. [38] By the turn of the 21st century, some analytic philosophers had also adopted the label of "left-libertarianism". [13] This contemporary model of left-libertarianism, associated mainly with Peter Vallentyne and Hillel Steiner, [39] distinguishes itself from right-libertarianism in its advocacy of the social ownership and equitable distribution of natural resources, while also upholding the libertarian principle of self-ownership. [40]

Philosophy

While all libertarians begin with a conception of personal autonomy from which they argue in favor of civil liberties and a reduction or elimination of the state, left-libertarianism encompasses those libertarian beliefs that claim the Earth's natural resources belong to everyone in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively. [2] [3] [8] [10] [11]

Property rights

Left-libertarians generally uphold self-ownership and oppose strong private property rights, instead supporting the egalitarian distribution of natural resources. [38] Other left-libertarians believe that neither claiming nor mixing one's labor with natural resources is enough to generate full private property rights [41] [42] and maintain that natural resources ought to be held in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively. [43]

Political scientist Peter Mclaverty notes it has been argued that socialist values are incompatible with the concept of self-ownership when this concept is considered "the core feature of libertarianism" and socialism is defined as holding "that we are social beings, that society should be organised, and individuals should act, so as to promote the common good, that we should strive to achieve social equality and promote democracy, community and solidarity." [44] However, political philosopher Nicholas Vrousalis has also argued that "property rights [...] do not pass judgment as to what rights individuals have to their own person [...] [and] to the external world" and that "the nineteenth-century egalitarian libertarians were not misguided in thinking that a thoroughly libertarian form of communism is possible at the level of principle." [45]

Economics

Other left-libertarians make a libertarian reading of progressive and social-democratic economics to advocate a universal basic income. Building on Michael Otsuka's conception of "robust libertarian self-ownership", Karl Widerquist argues that a universal basic income must be large enough to maintain individual independence regardless of the market value of resources because people in contemporary society have been denied direct access to enough resources with which they could otherwise maintain their existence in the absence of interference by people who control access to resources. [46]

Schools of thought

Social anarchism

Murray Bookchin, a left-libertarian of the social anarchist school Murray Bookchin, Burlington Vermont, 1990.jpg
Murray Bookchin, a left-libertarian of the social anarchist school

In its oldest form, "left-libertarianism" was used synonymously with social anarchism. [18] Although social anarchism and other forms of left-libertarianism share similar roots and concerns, social anarchism has distinguished itself as a distinct ideological tradition, [47] due to its fundamental rejection of the state. [48] In contrast to individualist tendencies, social anarchism rejects private property and market relations, [49] which they believe will be eliminated with the abolition of the state. [50]

Social anarchism, originally associated with the libertarianism of Joseph Déjacque, has historically encompassed collectivist anarchism, anarchist communism and anarcho-syndicalism; each of which became influential tendencies in the Russian and Spanish Revolutions. [51]

The contemporary left-libertarian Murray Bookchin advocated for the replacement of the state with a libertarian communist society, which he saw as a decentralized confederation of municipalities, in which decisions would be made by direct democracy. [52] Bookchin was also harshly critical of individualist anarchism, which he held responsible for the failure of left-libertarianism to take a prominent place in public discourse. [53]

New social movements

In 1960s Germany, the libertarian left was a dominant current in the extra-parliamentary opposition, "Außerparlamentarische Opposition" (ApO). [54]

The punk scene provoked an expansion of the libertarian left: "a broader 'libertarian left' influence can be discerned in punk and post-punk's engagement with gender relations, sexuality, consumerism, imperialism and so forth". [55]

Northern Europe saw an upsurge in radical left-libertarian activism, squatting and urban unrest at the turn of the 1980s. [34] From this point until the late 2010s, "the main tendency in radical left activism shifted from party-based Marxism-Leninism to network-based, direct-action activism based on libertarian socialist ideals… shifting [in this period] from direct-action networks that engaged in a variety of political issue—anti-fascism, anti-imperialism, feminism, animal rights, etc.—to more 'conventional' networks of organizations and initiatives through which activists intervened in local politics and neighborhood and workplace conflicts. The same period also saw the [radical left libertarian movements] become less disruptive and violent, in favor of tactical pragmatism and conventional forms of protest". [35]

Free-market anti-capitalism

Gary Chartier, a left-libertarian of the free-market anti-capitalist school Gary Chartier by Gage Skidmore.jpg
Gary Chartier, a left-libertarian of the free-market anti-capitalist school

Alongside social anarchists, left-wing proponents of free-market economics have associated themselves with left-libertarianism, [13] also partly influenced by the New Left. This post-classical definition has been used synonymously with the free-market anti-capitalism (a.k.a. left-wing market anarchism) advocated by Kevin Carson, Gary Chartier, and Charles W. Johnson, [56] who together formed the Alliance of the Libertarian Left and the subsequent Center for a Stateless Society. [57] Drawing from the views of American individualist anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner, left-wing market anarchists defend the use of free markets and private property, which they consider to have an "essential coordinating role" in society. [58] Free-market anti-capitalists hold market intervention responsible for capitalist control of the means of production, a situation they believe will be solved by the introduction of free competition. Building on Tucker's ideas, Kevin Carson has also defended the labor theory of value and occupancy-and-use land ownership, although not all free-market anti-capitalists agree with these positions. [57] Like social anarchists and unlike many right-libertarians, left-wing market anarchists are opposed to capitalism and other forms of oppression such as racism and sexism; they consider this anti-oppression politics to be an integral part of left-libertarianism. [59]

Green politics and left libertarian parties

The green movement, especially its more left-wing factions, is often described by political scientists as left-libertarian. [60] [61] [62]

In the wake of the new social movements (especially the ecology and anti-nuclear movements) of the 1970s and 1980s, many left libertarian parties (sometimes called movement parties) were formed, including green parties, which maintained a relationship with these social movements. [63] [64] Political scientists Santos and Mercea argue that, in recent years, "the rise of movement parties across Europe has disrupted traditional notions of party politics and opened up new avenues for citizen engagement and political mobilisation. Movement parties are the reflection of a wider socio-political transformation of increasing interconnection between electoral and non-electoral politics". For them, green/left-libertarian movement parties "embody a generational gap in political participation, as they utilise both electoral and non-electoral engagement to express their post-industrial demands... [Their] voters tend to be younger and more educated and engage more in online political activities." [65]

According to Herbert Kitschelt, left libertarian parties are "post-materialist" in that they reject the primary status of economic issues, and argue that "the predominance of markets and bureaucracies must be rolled back in favor of social solidarity relations and participatory institutions". [66] He posits that the strong commitment to direct participation leads to the weakness (or even absence) of formal structurel, centralized organization, leadership and hierarchy, and "a sometimes chaotic ‘assembly’ organizational style (as best illustrated by the water-balloon attack on Foreign Minister Joshka Fischer at the 1999 congress of the German Greens)." [67]

For example, between 1984 and 1986, ecologists worked together with anarchists and libertarians in Greece's Green Alternative Movement. [68] while the Dutch GroenLinks moved from socialism to left libertarianism in the early 1990s. [69] Political scientists see European political parties such as Ecolo and Groen in Belgium, Alliance 90/The Greens in Germany, or the Green Progressive Accord and GroenLinks in the Netherlands as coming out of the New Left and emphasizing spontaneous self-organisation, participatory democracy, decentralization and voluntarism, being contrasted to the bureaucratic or statist approach. [62] Similarly, political scientist Ariadne Vromen has described the Australian Greens as having a "clear left-libertarian ideological base." [70] Examples of left libertarian parties given by Kitschelt and Hellemans in 1990 were Agalev and Ecolo; [71] Kittschelt's term was applied to the Green Party of England and Wales in 2008; [72] examples given by Santos and Mercea more recently are Denmark's Alternativet, Germany's Bündis 90/Die Grünen, in Hungary LMP – Hungary's Green Party and Dialogue – The Greens' Party, and the UK's Green Party, Scottish Greens and Sinn Fein. [65]

Such parties attempt to apply left-libertarian ideas to a more pragmatic system of democratic governance as opposed to contemporary individualist or socialist libertarianism. [73] Typically, there is a tension between the left-libertarian inheritance and demands of pragmatism. For example, Margit Mayer and John Ely describe the German Greens as "remain[ing] connected to the left-libertarian movement milieus in the topics it addresses, its political style, and the omnipresence of movement discourse" while also pursuing practical strategies for party power. [74]

A new wave of left libertarian movement parties emerged from the alterglobalisation and anti-austerity movements from the late 1990s. In Portugal, the Left Bloc emerged in the late 1990s from the anti-austerity movement, and is inspired by the libertarian left. [75] Greece’s Synaspismos and its successor Syriza came from a similar background. [76] In Turkey, Ufuk Uras of the Party of the Greens and the Left Future identifies as a left-libertarian.Ufuk Uras identifies as a left libertarian. In 2015 he said: [77]

Contemporary left-libertarian philosophy

In contrast to right-libertarianism and libertarian socialism, left-libertarianism holds that individuals should have no exclusive right to the exploitation of natural resources, instead advocating for an equitable distribution of resources, while also insisting on the protection of personal property rights. [78] Contemporary left-libertarian scholars such as David Ellerman, [79] [80] Michael Otsuka, [81] Hillel Steiner, [82] Peter Vallentyne [83] and Philippe Van Parijs [84] root an economic egalitarianism in the classical liberal concepts of self-ownership and land appropriation, combined with geoist or physiocratic views regarding the ownership of land and natural resources (e.g. those of Henry George and John Locke). [85] [43] [86] Their intellectual forebears include Henry George, Thomas Paine, and Herbert Spencer. [87] [88] Classical economists such as Henry George, John Stuart Mill, the early writings of Herbert Spencer, [89] among others, "provided the basis for the further development of the left libertarian perspective." [90] Most left-libertarians of this tradition support some form of economic rent redistribution on the grounds that each individual is entitled to an equal share of natural resources [91] and argue for the desirability of state social welfare programs. [92] [93]

Scholars representing this school of left-libertarianism often understand their position in contrast to right-libertarians, who maintain that there are no fair share constraints on use or appropriation that individuals have the power to appropriate unowned things by claiming them (usually by mixing their labor with them) and deny any other conditions or considerations are relevant and that there is no justification for the state to redistribute resources to the needy or to overcome market failures. A number of left-libertarians of this school argue for the desirability of some state social welfare programs. [94] [93] Left-libertarians of the Carson–Long left-libertarianism school typically endorse the labor-based property rights that contemporary left-libertarians reject, but they hold that implementing such rights would have radical rather than conservative consequences. [95]

Left-libertarians of this school hold that it is illegitimate for anyone to claim private ownership of natural resources to the detriment of others. [87] These left-libertarians support some form of income redistribution on the grounds of a claim by each individual to be entitled to an equal share of natural resources. [96] [91] Unappropriated natural resources are either unowned or owned in common and private appropriation is only legitimate if everyone can appropriate an equal amount or if private appropriation is taxed to compensate those who are excluded from natural resources. [91]

See also

Related Research Articles

Individualist anarchism is the branch of anarchism that emphasizes the individual and their will over external determinants such as groups, society, traditions, and ideological systems. Although usually contrasted with social anarchism, both individualist and social anarchism have influenced each other. Some anarcho-capitalists claim anarcho-capitalism is part of the individualist anarchist tradition, while others disagree and claim individualist anarchism is only part of the socialist movement and part of the libertarian socialist tradition. Economically, while European individualist anarchists are pluralists who advocate anarchism without adjectives and synthesis anarchism, ranging from anarcho-communist to mutualist economic types, most American individualist anarchists of the 19th century advocated mutualism, a libertarian socialist form of market socialism, or a free-market socialist form of classical economics. Individualist anarchists are opposed to property that violates the entitlement theory of justice, that is, gives privilege due to unjust acquisition or exchange, and thus is exploitative, seeking to "destroy the tyranny of capital,—that is, of property" by mutual credit.

Individualism is the moral stance, political philosophy, ideology, and social outlook that emphasizes the intrinsic worth of the individual. Individualists promote realizing one's goals and desires, valuing independence and self-reliance, and advocating that the interests of the individual should gain precedence over the state or a social group, while opposing external interference upon one's own interests by society or institutions such as the government. Individualism makes the individual its focus, and so starts "with the fundamental premise that the human individual is of primary importance in the struggle for liberation".

Libertarian socialism is an anti-authoritarian and anti-capitalist political current that emphasises self-governance and workers' self-management. It is contrasted from other forms of socialism by its rejection of state ownership and from other forms of libertarianism by its rejection of private property. Broadly defined, it includes schools of both anarchism and Marxism, as well as other tendencies that oppose the state and capitalism.

Socialism is an economic and political philosophy encompassing diverse economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production, as opposed to private ownership. It describes the economic, political, and social theories and movements associated with the implementation of such systems. Social ownership can take various forms, including public, community, collective, cooperative, or employee. As one of the main ideologies on the political spectrum, socialism is considered as the standard left-wing ideology in most countries. Types of socialism vary based on the role of markets and planning in resource allocation, and the structure of management in organizations.

Green anarchism, also known as ecological anarchism or eco-anarchism, is an anarchist school of thought that focuses on ecology and environmental issues. It is an anti-capitalist and anti-authoritarian form of radical environmentalism, which emphasises social organization, freedom and self-fulfillment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murray Bookchin</span> American social theorist (1921–2006)

Murray Bookchin was an American social theorist, author, orator, historian, and political philosopher. Influenced by G. W. F. Hegel, Karl Marx, and Peter Kropotkin, he was a pioneer in the environmental movement. Bookchin formulated and developed the theory of social ecology and urban planning within anarchist, libertarian socialist, and ecological thought. He was the author of two dozen books covering topics in politics, philosophy, history, urban affairs, and social ecology. Among the most important were Our Synthetic Environment (1962), Post-Scarcity Anarchism (1971), The Ecology of Freedom (1982), and Urbanization Without Cities (1987). In the late 1990s, he became disenchanted with what he saw as an increasingly apolitical "lifestylism" of the contemporary anarchist movement, stopped referring to himself as an anarchist, and founded his own libertarian socialist ideology called "communalism", which seeks to reconcile and expand Marxist, syndicalist, and anarchist thought.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarchism in the United Kingdom</span>

Anarchism in the United Kingdom initially developed within the religious dissent movement that began after the Protestant Reformation. Anarchism was first seen among the radical republican elements of the English Civil War and following the Stuart Restoration grew within the fringes of radical Whiggery. The Whig politician Edmund Burke was the first to expound anarchist ideas, which developed as a tendency that influenced the political philosophy of William Godwin, who became the first modern proponent of anarchism with the release of his 1793 book Enquiry Concerning Political Justice.

Self-ownership, also known as sovereignty of the individual or individual sovereignty, is the concept of property in one's own person, expressed as the moral or natural right of a person to have bodily integrity and be the exclusive controller of one's own body and life. Self-ownership is a central idea in several political philosophies that emphasize individualism, such as libertarianism, liberalism, and anarchism.

According to different scholars, the history of anarchism either goes back to ancient and prehistoric ideologies and social structures, or begins in the 19th century as a formal movement. As scholars and anarchist philosophers have held a range of views on what anarchism means, it is difficult to outline its history unambiguously. Some feel anarchism is a distinct, well-defined movement stemming from 19th-century class conflict, while others identify anarchist traits long before the earliest civilisations existed.

The nature of capitalism is criticized by left-wing anarchists, who reject hierarchy and advocate stateless societies based on non-hierarchical voluntary associations. Anarchism is generally defined as the libertarian philosophy which holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary and harmful as well as opposing authoritarianism, illegitimate authority and hierarchical organization in the conduct of human relations. Capitalism is generally considered by scholars to be an economic system that includes private ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit or income, the accumulation of capital, competitive markets, voluntary exchange and wage labor, which have generally been opposed by most anarchists historically. Since capitalism is variously defined by sources and there is no general consensus among scholars on the definition nor on how the term should be used as a historical category, the designation is applied to a variety of historical cases, varying in time, geography, politics and culture.

Libertarianism is a political philosophy that places a strong emphasis on the value of liberty. Libertarians advocate for the expansion of individual autonomy and political freedom, emphasizing the principles of equality before the law and the protection of civil rights, including the rights to freedom of association, freedom of speech, freedom of thought and freedom of choice. Libertarians often oppose authority, state power, warfare, militarism and nationalism, but some libertarians diverge on the scope of their opposition to existing economic and political systems. Various schools of libertarian thought offer a range of views regarding the legitimate functions of state and private power. Different categorizations have been used to distinguish various forms of libertarianism. Scholars have identified distinct libertarian perspectives on the nature of property and capital, typically delineating them along left–right or socialist–capitalist axes. The various schools of libertarian thought have also been shaped by liberal ideas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Libertarianism in the United States</span> Origin, history and development of libertarianism in the United States

In the United States, libertarianism is a political philosophy promoting individual liberty. According to common meanings of conservatism and liberalism in the United States, libertarianism has been described as conservative on economic issues and liberal on personal freedom, often associated with a foreign policy of non-interventionism. Broadly, there are four principal traditions within libertarianism, namely the libertarianism that developed in the mid-20th century out of the revival tradition of classical liberalism in the United States after liberalism associated with the New Deal; the libertarianism developed in the 1950s by anarcho-capitalist author Murray Rothbard, who based it on the anti-New Deal Old Right and 19th-century libertarianism and American individualist anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner while rejecting the labor theory of value in favor of Austrian School economics and the subjective theory of value; the libertarianism developed in the 1970s by Robert Nozick and founded in American and European classical liberal traditions; and the libertarianism associated with the Libertarian Party, which was founded in 1971, including politicians such as David Nolan and Ron Paul.

Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism, or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political philosophy that supports capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of natural resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property and capital from left-libertarianism, a variant of libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an anti-authoritarian approach to property and income. In contrast to socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports free-market capitalism. Like most forms of libertarianism, it supports civil liberties, especially natural law, negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a significant transformation of the modern welfare state. Practitioners of right-libertarianism usually do not self-describe by that term and often object to it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Individualist anarchism in the United States</span> Part of anarchism in the US

Individualist anarchism in the United States was strongly influenced by Benjamin Tucker, Josiah Warren, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Lysander Spooner, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Max Stirner, Herbert Spencer and Henry David Thoreau. Other important individualist anarchists in the United States were Stephen Pearl Andrews, William Batchelder Greene, Ezra Heywood, M. E. Lazarus, John Beverley Robinson, James L. Walker, Joseph Labadie, Steven Byington and Laurance Labadie.

Libertarianism is variously defined by sources as there is no general consensus among scholars on the definition nor on how one should use the term as a historical category. Scholars generally agree that libertarianism refers to the group of political philosophies which emphasize freedom, individual liberty and voluntary association. Libertarians generally advocate a society with little or no government power.

The following is a list of terms specific to anarchists. Anarchism is a political and social movement which advocates voluntary association in opposition to authoritarianism and hierarchy.

Far-left politics, also known as extreme left politics or left-wing extremism, are politics further to the left on the left–right political spectrum than the standard political left. The term does not have a single, coherent definition; some scholars consider it to be the left of communist parties, while others broaden it to include the left of social democracy. In certain instances—especially in the news media—far left has been associated with some forms of authoritarianism, anarchism, communism, and Marxism, or are characterized as groups that advocate for revolutionary socialism and related communist ideologies, or anti-capitalism and anti-globalization. Far-left terrorism consists of extremist, militant, or insurgent groups that attempt to realize their ideals through political violence rather than using democratic processes.

Types of socialism include a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production and organizational self-management of enterprises as well as the political theories and movements associated with socialism. Social ownership may refer to forms of public, collective or cooperative ownership, or to citizen ownership of equity in which surplus value goes to the working class and hence society as a whole. There are many varieties of socialism and no single definition encapsulates all of them, but social ownership is a common element shared by its various forms. Socialists disagree about the degree to which social control or regulation of the economy is necessary, how far society should intervene, and whether government, particularly existing government, is the correct vehicle for change.

Social anarchism, also known as left-wing anarchism or socialist anarchism, is the branch of anarchism that sees liberty and social equality as interrelated.

Anarchism and libertarianism, as broad political ideologies with manifold historical and contemporary meanings, have contested definitions. Their adherents have a pluralistic and overlapping tradition that makes precise definition of the political ideology difficult or impossible, compounded by a lack of common features, differing priorities of subgroups, lack of academic acceptance, and contentious historical usage.

References

  1. ↑ Carlson 2012, p. 1006; Goodway 2006, p. 4; Marshall 2008, p. 641.
  2. 1 2 Spitz, Jean-Fabien (March 2006). "Left-wing libertarianism: equality based on self-ownership". Raisons Politiques. 23 (3). Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Long 2012, p. 227.
  4. ↑ Carlson 2012, pp. 1006–1007.
  5. ↑ Long 2012, p. 227; Kymlicka 2005, p. 516.
  6. ↑ Carlson 2012, p. 1009.
  7. ↑ Bookchin, Murray; Biehl, Janet (1997). The Murray Bookchin Reader. London: Cassell. p. 170. ISBN   0-304-33873-7.
  8. 1 2 Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilbur R. The social history of crime and punishment in America. London: Sage Publications. p. 1007. ISBN   1-4129-8876-4. "Left-libertarians disagree with right-libertarians with respect to property rights, arguing instead that individuals have no inherent right to natural resources. Namely, these resources must be treated as collective property that is made available on an egalitarian basis".
  9. ↑ Carson, Kevin. "An Introduction to Left-Libertarianism". Center for a Stateless Society. Archived from the original on 2019-09-03. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  10. 1 2 Vallentyne, Peter (March 2009). "Libertarianism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Archived from the original on 6 July 2019. Retrieved 5 March 2010. Libertarianism is committed to full self-ownership. A distinction can be made, however, between right-libertarianism and left-libertarianism, depending on the stance taken on how natural resources can be owned.
  11. 1 2 Narveson, Jan; Trenchard, David (2008). "Left Libertarianism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. pp. 288–289. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n174. ISBN   978-1-4129-6580-4. LCCN   2008009151. OCLC   750831024. Archived from the original on 2023-01-09. Retrieved 2016-03-18. Left libertarians regard each of us as full self-owners. However, they differ from what we generally understand by the term libertarian in denying the right to private property. We own ourselves, but we do not own nature, at least not as individuals. Left libertarians embrace the view that all natural resources, land, oil, gold, and so on should be held collectively. To the extent that individuals make use of these commonly owned goods, they must do so only with the permission of society, a permission granted only under the proviso that a certain payment for their use be made to society at large.
  12. ↑ Carlson 2012, p. 1006; Marshall 2008, pp. 641–642.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Long 2021, p. 30.
  14. ↑ Stevenson, Nick (March 2021). "Orwell as Public Intellectual: Anarchism, Communism and the New Left". Anarchist Studies. 29 (1). Lawrence Wishart: 19–38. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  15. ↑ Long 2021, p. 30; Marshall 2008, p. 641.
  16. ↑ Long 2021, p. 30; Marshall 2008, pp. 641–642.
  17. ↑ Berman, Paul (25 September 1996). "The Last of the Anarchists". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 12 September 2024. The word "libertarian" began as a left-wing synonym for "anarchist," and was taken over by the right-wing free-marketers of the Libertarian Party only in recent decades.
  18. 1 2 Goodway 2006, pp. 1–4; Long 2012, p. 227.
  19. ↑ Goodway 2006, p. 4; Long 2017, p. 308n104; Long 2021, p. 30.
  20. ↑ Goodway 2006, p. 4; Long 2021, p. 30.
  21. ↑ George Woodcock (23 October 2016). "The crystal spirit: A study of George Orwell". Internet Archive. Retrieved 11 September 2024. [George] Orwell appeared on the platform with Herbert Read, Fenner Brockway and a few other leaders of the libertarian Left.[p.18]... Julian Symons was substantially correct when he said, in his London Magazine article, that Orwell retained his faith in libertarian socialism until his death, but that in the end this belief "was expressed for him more sympathetically in the personalities of unpractical Anarchists than in the slide rule Socialists who made up the bulk of the British Parliamentary Labor Party.[p.27]... Orwell's affinities were in fact less with Lawrence and Yeats than with William Morris, another libertarian Socialist who distrusted doctrinaires [p.83]
  22. ↑ Historians Evan Smith and Matthew Worley describe "left libertarianism" as discussed by David Goodway as "the space between anarchism and socialist humanism."Smith, Evan; Worley, Matthew (2014). "Introduction: The far left in Britain from 1956". Against the grain: The British far left from 1956. Manchester University Press. p. 1–22. ISBN   978-0-7190-9590-0. JSTOR   j.ctt18mvmsj.6 . Retrieved 12 September 2024.
  23. ↑ Benoît Challand, "Socialisme ou Barbarie or the Partial Encounters Between Anarchism and Critical Marxism", in: Alex Prichard, Ruth Kinna, Dave Berry, Saku Pinta (eds.), Libertarian Socialism: Politics in Black and Red, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 210–231, esp. 210, "... Castoriadis's evident legacy to Left-libertarian thinking and his radical break with orthodox Marxist-Leninism ..."
  24. ↑ Long 2017, p. 308n104.
  25. ↑ Kitschelt, Herbert (1989) The Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  26. ↑ Gunther, Richard; Diamond, Larry (2003). "Species of Political Parties: A New Typology". Party Politics. 9 (2): 167–199. doi:10.1177/13540688030092003. ISSN   1354-0688. Herbert Kitschelt (1989) differentiates parties that emphasize the 'logic of electoral competition' from those (such as the 'left-libertarian' type that he introduces) that place much greater stress on the 'logic of constituency representation'...
  27. ↑ Kitschelt, H. (1988) 'Left-libertarian parties: explaining innovation in competitive party systems', World Politics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 194 –234.
  28. ↑ Tsakatika, Myrto; Eleftheriou, Costas (2013). "The Radical Left's Turn towards Civil Society in Greece: One Strategy, Two Paths". South European Society and Politics. 18: 81–99. doi:10.1080/13608746.2012.757455.
  29. ↑ Lourenço, Pedro (2021). "Studying European Radical Left Parties since the Fall of the Berlin Wall (1990–2019): A Scoping Review". Swiss Political Science Review . 27 (4): 754–777. doi:10.1111/spsr.12478. ISSN   1424-7755.
  30. ↑ March, L., & Mudde, C. (2005). What's left of the radical left? The European radical left after 1989: Decline and mutation. Comparative European Politics, 3(1), 23–49.
  31. ↑ Redding, K., & Viterna, J. S. (1999). Political demands, political opportunities: Explaining the differential success of left-libertarian parties. Social Forces, 78(2), 491–510.
  32. ↑ Jan Jämte and Adrienne Sörbom, Why Did It Not Happen Here? The Gradual Radicalization of the Anarchist Movement in Sweden 1980–90, in: A European Youth Revolt European Perspectives on Youth Protest and Social Movements in the 1980s, Palgrave, 2016, p.98
  33. ↑ "Anarchists in Eastern and Western Europe". Södertörns högskola. Retrieved 20 August 2024.
  34. 1 2 Jan Jämte and Adrienne Sörbom, Why Did It Not Happen Here? The Gradual Radicalization of the Anarchist Movement in Sweden 1980–90, p.97
  35. 1 2 Jämte, Jan; Lundstedt, Måns; Wennerhag, Magnus (2023). "Radical Left Movements in Scandinavia, 1980–2020: Straddling Militant Counterculture and Popular Movements". The Palgrave Handbook of Left-Wing Extremism, Volume 1. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 281–304. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30897-0_16. ISBN   978-3-031-30896-3.
  36. ↑ Polanska, Dominika V.; Piotrowski, Grzegorz (3 November 2016). "Poland: Local differences and the importence of cohesion". Baltic Worlds. IX (1–2): 46–56. Retrieved 20 August 2024.
  37. ↑ Piotrowski, Grzegorz; Wennerhag, Magnus (2015), "Always against the state? An analysis of Polish and Swedish radical left-libertarian activists' interaction with institutionalized politics", Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8 (3), University of Salento: 845–875, doi:10.1285/I20356609V8I3P845
  38. 1 2 Carlson 2012, p. 1006.
  39. ↑ Kymlicka 2005, pp. 516–517; Long 2012, p. 227.
  40. ↑ Kymlicka 2005, p. 516; Long 2012, p. 227; Long 2021, p. 30.
  41. ↑ Carlson (2012). p. 1007. "[Left-libertarians] disagree with right-libertarians with respect to property rights, arguing instead that individuals have no inherent right to natural resources. Namely, these resources must be treated as collective property that is made available on an egalitarian basis."
  42. ↑ Narveson, Jan; Trenchard, David (2008). "Left Libertarianism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. pp. 288–289. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n174. ISBN   978-1-4129-6580-4. LCCN   2008009151. OCLC   750831024. Archived from the original on 2023-01-09. Retrieved 2016-03-18. [Left libertarians] regard each of us as full self-owners. Left libertarians embrace the view that all natural resources, land, oil, gold, trees, and so on should be held collectively. To the extent that individuals make use of these commonly owned goods, they must do so only with the permission of society, a permission granted only under the provision that a certain payment for their use be made to society at large.
  43. 1 2 Vallentyne, Peter (2014). "Libertarianism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 2024-02-08. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  44. ↑ Mclaverty, Peter (2005). "Socialism and libertarianism". Journal of Political Ideologies. 10 (2): 185–198. doi:10.1080/13569310500097349. S2CID   144693867.
  45. ↑ Vrousalis, Nicholas (April 2011). "Libertarian Socialism: A Better Reconciliation between Self-Ownership and Equality". Social Theory and Practice. 37 (2): 221–226. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201137213. JSTOR   23558541. SSRN   1703457.
  46. ↑ Widerquist, Karl (2013). "What Good Is a Theory of Freedom That Allows Forced Labor? Independence and Modern Theory of Freedom". Independence, Propertylessness, and Basic Income: A Theory of Freedom as the Power to Say No Updating. New York City: Springer. pp. 121–143. ISBN   978-1-137-31309-6.
  47. ↑ Marshall 2008, p. 642.
  48. ↑ Bookchin 1995, p. 60; Marshall 2008, p. 642.
  49. ↑ Long 2012, p. 219; Marshall 2008, pp. 498–499.
  50. ↑ Long 2012, p. 219.
  51. ↑ Long 2012, pp. 223–224.
  52. ↑ Bookchin 1995, p. 60.
  53. ↑ Bookchin 1995, pp. 51–59.
  54. ↑ Confesson, Alan (8 February 2019). Une nouvelle gauche radicale : analyse comparative des transformations de la famille partisane de la gauche radicale européenne au XXIème siècle: (2000-2017) (Thesis). Université Grenoble Alpes. Retrieved 22 August 2024.
  55. ↑ Matthew Worley, Riotous Assembly: British Punk's Cultural Diaspora in the Summer of '81, in: A European Youth Revolt European Perspectives on Youth Protest and Social Movements in the 1980s, Palgrave, 2016, p.224-25
  56. ↑ Long 2012, p. 227; Long 2017, p. 308; Long 2021, pp. 31–32.
  57. 1 2 Long 2017, p. 308.
  58. ↑ Long 2021, pp. 31–32.
  59. ↑ Long 2021, p. 32.
  60. ↑ Kitschelt, Herbert (1988). "The Life Expectancy of Left-Libertarian Parties. Does Structural Transformation or Economic Decline Explain Party Innovation? A Response to Wilhelm P. Bürklin". European Sociological Review. 4 (2): 155–160. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036474. ISSN   0266-7215. JSTOR   522545.
  61. ↑ Redding, Kent; Viterna, Jocelyn S. (1999). "Political Demands, Political Opportunities: Explaining the Differential Success of Left-Libertarian Parties". Social Forces. 78 (2): 491–510. doi:10.2307/3005565. ISSN   0037-7732. JSTOR   3005565.
  62. 1 2 Neumayer, Eric (June 2003). "Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries". Ecological Economics. 45 (2): 203–220. Bibcode:2003EcoEc..45..203N. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00012-0. ISSN   0921-8009. Archived from the original on 2019-05-11. Retrieved 2019-11-29.
  63. ↑ Porta, Donatella della; Fernández, Joseba; Kouki, Hara; Mosca, Lorenzo (2017-05-01). Movement Parties Against Austerity. Cambridge Malden (Mass.): Polity. p. 21. ISBN   978-1-5095-1145-7.
  64. ↑ Kim, Seongcheol (15 August 2023). "Movement parties of the left, right, and center: A discursive-organizational approach". Constellations. 31 (3): 399–413. doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.12705 . ISSN   1351-0487. an earlier wave of interest in movement–party interactions that emerged in the late 1980s and 1990s in relation to newly emerging Green and "left-libertarian" political parties in the wake of anti-nuclear and environmental protest movements (Kitschelt, 1989; Kitschelt & Hellemans, 1990; Mayer & Ely, 1998; Richardson & Rootes, 1994).
  65. 1 2 Santos, Felipe G.; Mercea, Dan (20 January 2024). "Young democrats, critical citizens and protest voters: studying the profiles of movement party supporters". Acta Politica. doi: 10.1057/s41269-023-00321-7 . ISSN   0001-6810.
  66. ↑ Kitschelt, 1989:64, cited by Gunther and Diamond 2003:188
  67. ↑ Kitschelt, 1989:66, cited by Gunther and Diamond 2003:189
  68. ↑ Gregor Kritidis, The Rise and Crisis of the Anarchist and Libertarian Movement in Greece, 1973–2012, in: The City Is Ours: Squatting and Autonomous Movements in Europe from the 1970s to the Present, 2014, p.75
  69. ↑ March, Luke (2013). Radical Left Parties in Europe. London: Routledge Studies in Extremism. p. 159. ISBN   978-0-415-84323-2.
  70. ↑ Vromen, Ariadne (2005). "Who are the Australian Greens? Surveying the membership". Ethnographic Praxis in Industry. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  71. ↑ Kitschelt, Herbert; Hellemans, Staf (1990). "The Left-Right Semantics and the New Politics Cleavage". Comparative Political Studies. 23 (2): 210–238. doi:10.1177/0010414090023002003. ISSN   0010-4140. The general distribution of opinions on the issues fully justifies calling Agalev and Ecolo left-libertarian parties, the attributes we used at the beginning of this article to characterize the entire cohort of new politics parties. In many ways, ecology party activists constitute a "second left (Sainteny, 1987, p. 28), which blends anticapitalist with ecological, postmaterialist, and libertarian demands. The marketplace should not be the central institution of economic governance, yet militants are more inclined to support decentralized, communitarian institutions with direct democratic participation than to support traditional statist and collectivist socialism. Moreover, they put less emphasis on redistributive concerns that have figured so prominently on the conventional socialist policy agenda. Anticapitalism shows that ideological components of traditional left thinking are still alive in left-libertarian politics... At the same time, however, they are combined with noneconomic themes that are hard to reconcile with socialist leftism.
  72. ↑ Carter, Neil (2008). "The Green Party: Emerging from the Political Wilderness?". British Politics. 3 (2): 223–240. doi:10.1057/bp.2008.5. ISSN   1746-918X.
  73. ↑ Sharlamanov, Kire (2023). "Environment Protection in a Left-Libertarian Political Philosophy". The Left Libertarianism of the Greens. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 33–63. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39263-4_2. ISBN   978-3-031-39262-7.
  74. ↑ Mayer, Margit; Ely, John (1998). The German Greens. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. p. 7. ISBN   978-1-56639-515-1.
  75. ↑ Confesson, Alan (8 February 2019). Une nouvelle gauche radicale : analyse comparative des transformations de la famille partisane de la gauche radicale européenne au XXIème siècle : (2000-2017) (Thesis). Université Grenoble Alpes. Retrieved 22 August 2024. Although heavily dependent on its leaders to ensure its progress at the polls, the Portuguese Left Bloc has retained an internal organisation that is fairly faithful to the left-libertarian party model, with in particular "participative" mechanisms granting relatively significant powers to members, and significant internal division… Although the role of the charismatic leader was decisive in the rise of the BE, first with Francisco Louçã and then with Catarina Martins, the internal mode of operation of the party, largely inspired by the traditions of the libertarian left, saw few changes between 1999 and 2017.
  76. ↑ Confesson, Alan (8 February 2019). Une nouvelle gauche radicale : analyse comparative des transformations de la famille partisane de la gauche radicale européenne au XXIème siècle : (2000-2017) (Thesis). Université Grenoble Alpes. Retrieved 22 August 2024. Syriza is an excellent example, which could eventually become a textbook case in the scientific literature: originally a coalition of several parties, close to the model of the left-libertarian party, with few hierarchical structures, decentralized decision-making processes, imprecise statutes, a refusal of professionalization and exacerbated factionalism, Syriza evolved in record time into a highly centralized organization which ended up merging with its leader, Alexis Tsipras… The observations, however, also apply to Synaspismos before the creation of Syriza, a party which, from an organizational point of view, corresponds almost in all respects to the model of the left-libertarian party, and has in some way imported this culture into Syriza.
  77. ↑ "Turkish libertarian: Pro-Kurdish HDP in Turkey should be like Syriza in Greece". rudaw.net. 1 January 1970. Retrieved 9 September 2024. The libertarian left is different from the traditional left because of its principles. These are: going in and out of power through elections, respect for different identities and beliefs, socially libertarian, egalitarian, eco-minded, participatory and for the restoration of justice. We would like the HDP to have such a profile. What we are trying to do is to adopt the Syriza experience in Greece to the HDP in Turkey.
  78. ↑ Carlson 2012, p. 1007.
  79. ↑ Ellerman, David (1992). Property and Contract in Economics: The Case for Economic Democracy. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.
  80. ↑ Ellerman, David (1990). The Democratic Worker-Owned Firm. London: Unwin Hyman.
  81. ↑
    • Otsuka, Michael (2005). Libertarianism Without Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-928018-6.
  82. ↑ Steiner, Hillel (1994). An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.
  83. ↑ (2000). Left Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. In Vallentyne, Peter; and Steiner, Hillel. London:Palgrave.
  84. ↑ Van Parijs, Philippe (2009). Marxism Recycled. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  85. ↑ Vallentyne, Peter (2007). "Libertarianism and the State". Liberalism: Old and New. In Paul, Ellen Frankel; Miller Jr., Fred; Paul, Jeffrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 199.
  86. ↑ Casal, Paula (2011). "Global Taxes on Natural Resources" (PDF). Journal of Moral Philosophy. 8 (3): 307–327. doi:10.1163/174552411x591339. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014. It can also invoke geoism, a philosophical tradition encompassing the views of John Locke and Henry George [...].
  87. 1 2 Kymlicka 2005, p. 516.
  88. ↑ Fried 2004, p. 66.
  89. ↑ Fried 2020, p. 176.
  90. ↑ Ryley, Peter (2013). Making Another World Possible: Anarchism, Anti-capitalism and Ecology in Late 19th and Early 20th Century Britain. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 5. ISBN   978-1-4411-5377-7.
  91. 1 2 3 Mack, Eric; Gaus, Gerald F. (2004). "Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism: The Liberty Tradition". In Gaus, Gerald F.; Kukathas, Chandran (eds.). Handbook of Political Theory. Sage. p. 128. ISBN   978-0-7619-6787-3. Archived from the original on 2024-02-08. Retrieved 2023-01-29.
  92. ↑ Van Parijs, Phillippe (1998). Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon-Oxford University Press.
  93. 1 2 Daskal, Steve (1 January 2010). "Libertarianism Left and Right, the Lockean Proviso, and the Reformed Welfare State". Social Theory and Practice . p. 1.Archived 16 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  94. ↑ Van Parijs, Phillippe (1998). Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford:Clarendon-Oxford University Press.
  95. ↑ Vallentyne, Peter; Steiner, Hillel (2000). The Origins of Left-Libertarianism. Basingstoke: Palgrave. ISBN   978-0-312-23591-8.
  96. ↑ Vallentyne, Peter; Steiner, Hillel (2000). Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics. Basingstoke: Palgrave. p. 1. ISBN   978-0-312-23699-1. OCLC   1057919438.

Bibliography

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.