Marhaenism

Marhaenism (Indonesian : Marhaenisme) is a socialistic political ideology originated and developed by the first President of Indonesia, Sukarno. ^[1] It was developed from the ideas of Marxism applied according to the nature and culture of Indonesia, or simply described as "Marxism adapted to Indonesian conditions". ^[2]

Marhaenism is a variant of Marxism but emphasizes national unity, culture, collectivist economics, and democratic rights and condemns liberalism and individualism. It was established as an anticapitalist and anti-imperialist ideology, but it combines both Western and Eastern principles. Marhaenism was the guiding ideology of the Indonesian National Party. ^[3] It also was a major influence on left-wing nationalism taking hold in neighbouring Malaya, such as the espousals of Parti Kebangsaan Melayu and later Parti Rakyat both founded by Ahmad Boestamam. ^[4]

Etymology

The name of the ideology is taken from the name of a peasant, Aen, that Sukarno claimed he met near Bandung. In the dialogue between Bung Karno and the farmer, he was later referred to as Mang Aen. The farmer has various factors of production including agricultural land, hoes, and others that he cultivates himself, but the results are only enough for the needs of his simple family. This condition then triggered various questions in Bung Karno's mind, which eventually gave birth to various dialectics of thought as the basis for his next move. Life, an innocent personality, unpretentious but still has the spirit to struggle to meet the needs of his life, then the name of the farmer by Bung Karno is enshrined in every Indonesian whose life is oppressed by the prevailing system of life. As a language adjustment, Mang Aen's name became Marhaen. ^{[5] [6]}

However, this turned out to be a myth as the name was used by Sarekat Islam to describe ordinary people long before Sukarno first came to Bandung. ^[7] In any case, Sukarno took to referring to members of the agrarian class as "Marhaens", a term that was first used by Sukarno in his Indonesia Accuses (Indonesia Menggugat) speech in 1930 to replace the term proletariat, as he considered the latter to be largely irrelevant to Indonesia. ^[8] Defining "proletariat" as members of the working class not owning their own labour power, Sukarno pointed out that many Indonesian farmers owned their labour power and used it primarily for themselves, in spite of their poverty. To Sukarno, the means of production in Indonesia were so small that they are only sufficient to sustain life of the Individual; to raise social, political, or economic status. Thus the expression "marhaen" extended the meaning aimed at all the small groups of people that are meant to be farmers and laborers (proletarians) whose lives are always in the grip of the rich and rulers/bourgeois/capitalists. ^[9]

In 1966, an opinion emerged stating that Marhaen was an abbreviation of Marx, Hegel, Engels. ^{[10] [11]} According to politician Nazaruddin Sjamsuddin, the first time this opinion emerged was triggered by an editorial in the Angkatan Bersenjata newspaper which was immediately answered by Osa Maliki from the Marhaen Development Institute Team. ^[12]

Ideology

Marhaenism is essentially a struggle ideology formed from Social Nationalism, Social Democracy, and the cultural divinity from Sukarno's beliefs.

One of the basic theses put forward by Sukarno was the necessity of combining the idea of national liberation with the Marxist vision of history, understood as a permanent struggle of the oppressed class with the oppressor. In such a vision of reality, the vast majority of Indonesians, as Marhaens, had participated for centuries in the historical system of class oppression, from the 350 years of the feudalistic system to the Dutch colonial system. The national liberation struggle therefore took the form of a revolution, which was to overthrow the colonial order and establish a socialist republic. ^[13]

According to Marhaenism, to be economically independent and free from exploitation by other parties, each person or household needs factors of production or capital. The form can be in the form of land or machines/tools. In a modern context, vehicles, information technology devices, kitchen utensils, and electronic goods can be effectively used as capital or production factors. Although not large, the ownership of capital is necessary to ensure the independence of the person or household in the economy.

Marhaenism rejected the capitalist model of the state as contrary to the ideas of equality and democracy. Sukarno rejected liberalism and individualism. ^[14] The collectivism postulated in Marhaenism, however, differed significantly from Marx's postulates regarding the socialization of the means of production. The aim of the national revolution was not to equalize the rights of the wealthy Dutch population with the rights of the indigenous inhabitants, but to gain full control over the land and means of production by the Indonesians. In contrast to capitalism, capital in Marhaenism is not to be hoarded or multiplied but is to be processed to meet the necessities of life and produce a surplus. Farmers plant to feed their own families and then sell the surplus or excess to the market. Tailors, craftsmen, and laborers produce goods, which later some will be used by themselves although the rest is of course sold. Ideally, the self-sufficiency requirement should be met before serving the market. That means when workers, craftsmen, or farmers produce goods that will not be consumed by themselves, they act only as factors of production for others, which makes them vulnerable to being dictated by the market or exploited. In aggregate (overall) in a Marhaenist economic system, goods that are not needed will not be produced because people and households must first ensure the profile and the level of their own needs before they make anything. The innovation of the birth of a new product will occur when the need is really concrete. The method encourages the achievement of efficiency and prevents wasting resources and consumptive attitudes. Because it functions only to produce a surplus, the available capital cannot be hoarded or misappropriated to suppress the economic growth and the development of other parties.

The Marhaenism that was referred to by Sukarno can be compared with the formulation of the entrepreneurship theory approach, which was introduced only in the 1970s by David McClelland, almost 50 years later. The difference is that McCleland puts more emphasis on the option of planting the need for achievement or the will to get ahead from the people or small entrepreneurs and so it is in fact dominated by a functional approach. Sukarno's approach to marhaen (farmers and small traders) is actually structural, through the cultivation of a progressive revolutionary attitude.

In a speech before the United Nations General Assembly, September 30, 1960, Sukarno firmly stated that Pancasila was essentially a sublimation of the United States Declaration of Independence and the Communist Manifesto, thus declaring that means that Pancasila was actually the third alternative from the two opposing camps in the Cold War between the Western Bloc and the Eastern Bloc at that time.

Bibliography

• Dahm, Bernard (1974). "The Parties, the Masses and the Elections: A Historical Survey". In Oey Hong Lee (ed.). Indonesia After the 1971 Elections. Oxford University press. pp. 7–22. ISBN   0-19-713422-X.
• Pour, Julius (2010). Gerakan 30 September: pelaku, pahlawan & petualang[The September 30th Movement: doers, heroes & adventurers] (in Indonesian). Buku Kompas. ISBN   9789797095246.
• Saksono, Ignatius Gatut (2008). Marhaenisme Bung Karno: marxisme ala Indonesia[Bung Karno's Marhaenism: Marxism a la Indonesia] (in Indonesian). Yabinkas Learning House. ISBN   9789791118682.
• Soerojo, Soegiarso (nd). Siapa Menabur Angin akan Menuai Badai : G30S - PKI dan Peran Bung Kamo[Whoever sows the wind will reap the storm: G30S-PKI and the role of Bung Karno] (in Indonesian). Soegiarso Soerojo.
• Sulistyanto, Ali (ed.). Marhaenisme Sukarno[Sukarno's Marhaenism] (in Indonesian). Promedia.

References

1. Dictionary of the modern politics of South-East Asia
2. Rocamora, J. Eliseo (October 1970). "The Partai Nasional Indonesia, 1963–1965". Indonesia. 10 (10): 143–181. doi: 10.2307/3350638 . hdl: 1813/53493 . JSTOR   3350638.
3. The Transition to Guided Democracy: Indonesian Politics, 1957-1959
4. Teo Lee Ken (Apr 2018). "Liberational Justice in the Political Thought of Ahmad Boestamam". Southeast Asian Studies. 7 (1). Kyoto University: 68-9. doi:10.20495/seas.7.1_65.
5. Adams, Cindy Heller (2011). "Chapter VI: Marhaenisme". Bung Karno: penyambung lidah rakyat Indonesia (in Indonesian). Kerja sama Yayasan Bung Karno [dengan] Penerbit Media Pressindo. ISBN   978-979-9110-32-9.
6. "Kisah Kang Aeng dan Bung Karno". Historia - Majalah Sejarah Populer Pertama di Indonesia (in Indonesian). 2018-03-14. Retrieved 2024-10-20.
7. Dahm (1974) p15
8. "Marhaenisme Pancasila". Archived from the original on 2019-05-06. Retrieved 2014-01-21.
9. Firdausi, Fadrik Aziz (2020-06-29). "Marhaenisme, Ideologi yang Tercetus Saat Sukarno Bersepeda". tirto.id (in Indonesian). Retrieved 2024-10-20.
10. Pour 2010, h. 457
11. Soerojo 1988
12. Sjamsuddin, Nazaruddin (1984). PNI dan kepolitikannya : 1963-1969 (in Indonesian). Jakarta: Rajawali.
13. "Sukarno's Pancasila, Nasakom and Marhaenism Concepts | The Indonesian Army". www.theindonesianarmy.com. Retrieved 2017-06-06.
14. Mackie, J. a. C. (1968-09-01). "The Transition to Guided Democracy: Indonesian Politics, 1957–59". Journal of Southeast Asian History. 9 (2). doi:10.1017/S0217781100004774. ISSN   0217-7811.