Liberal socialism

Last updated

Liberal socialism is a political philosophy that incorporates liberal principles to socialism. [1] Liberal socialism has been compared to post-war social democracy [2] as it supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods. [3] While social democracy is anti-capitalist insofar as criticism of capitalism is linked to the private ownership of the means of production, [4] liberal socialism identifies artificial and legalistic monopolies to be the fault of capitalism [5] and opposes an entirely unregulated market economy. [6] It considers both liberty and equality to be compatible and mutually dependent on each other. [1] Liberal socialism is a type of socialism that has been most prominent in the post-war period. For Ian Adams, post-war social democracy and socialist New Labour are examples of liberal socialism, in contrast to classical socialism. However, those two forms of liberal socialism are based on two different economic theories, namely Keynesianism and supply side, respectively. [2] According to Christopher Pierson, "actually existing liberal democracy is, in substantial part, a product of socialist (social democratic) forces". [7] According to Ian Hunt, liberal socialism is an alternative social ideal grounded in both socialist Karl Marx and liberal John Rawls. [8]

Contents

Principles that can be described as liberal socialist are based on the works of liberal, left-liberal, radical and socialist economists and philosophers such as Roberto Ardigò, [9] Eduard Bernstein, [10] Henry Charles Carey, [11] G. D. H. Cole, [10] Jean Hippolyte Colins de Ham  [ fr ], [12] John Dewey, [10] Eugen Dühring, [11] Henry George, [11] François Huet  [ fr ], [12] Peter Kropotkin, [11] John Locke, [13] John Stuart Mill, [10] William Ogilvie of Pittensear, [14] Thomas Paine, [15] Karl Polanyi, [16] Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, [11] Carlo Rosselli, [10] Adam Smith, [17] Thomas Spence, [14] Herbert Spencer [18] and Léon Walras. [19] Other important liberal socialist figures include Norberto Bobbio, [20] Guido Calogero  [ it ], [21] Anthony Crosland, [22] Piero Gobetti, [23] Theodor Hertzka, [11] Leonard Hobhouse, [22] Oszkár Jászi, [24] John Maynard Keynes, [25] Josef Macek  [ cz ], [14] Chantal Mouffe, [10] Franz Oppenheimer, [26] John Rawls [27] and R. H. Tawney. [28] To Polanyi, liberal socialism's goal was overcoming exploitative aspects of capitalism by expropriation of landlords and opening to all the opportunity to own land. [16] For Polanyi, it represented the culmination of a tradition initiated by the physiocrats, among others. [11]

Liberal socialism has been particularly prominent in British and Italian politics. [6] Its seminal ideas can be traced to John Stuart Mill, who theorised that capitalist societies should experience a gradual process of socialisation through worker-controlled enterprises, coexisting with private enterprises. [29] Mill rejected centralised models of socialism that he thought might discourage competition and creativity, but he argued that representation is essential in a free government and democracy could not subsist if economic opportunities were not well distributed, therefore conceiving democracy not just as form of representative government, but as an entire social organisation. [30] While socialists have been hostile to liberalism, accused of "providing an ideological cover for the depredation of capitalism", it has been pointed out that "the goals of liberalism are not so different from those of the socialists", although this similarly in goals has been described as being deceptive due to the different meanings liberalism and socialism give to liberty, equality and solidarity. [31]

History

Argentina

Leandro N. Alem, founder of liberal socialism in Argentina's politics and head of the Revolution of the Park Leandro N. Alem.jpg
Leandro N. Alem, founder of liberal socialism in Argentina's politics and head of the Revolution of the Park

During the National Autonomist Party governments, liberal socialism emerged in Argentina's politics as opposed to the Julio Argentino Roca's ruling conservative liberalism. A first spokesperson of the new trend was Leandro N. Alem, founder of the Radical Civil Union. Liberal socialists never governed in Argentina, but they constituted the main opposition from 1880 to 1914 and again from 1930 until the rise of Peronism. Juan B. Justo (an Alem's disciple), José Ingenieros, Nicolás Repetto, Moisés Lebensohn, the Dickman brothers and Alicia Moreau de Justo are among the representatives of the trend during the Década Infame in the 1930s as part of the Radical Civic Union or the Socialist Party. [32]

José Ingenieros' work has had diffusion all over Latin America. [33] In the 2003 Argentine general election, Ricardo López Murphy (who has denominated himself a liberal socialist in the tradition of Alem and Juan Bautista Alberdi) ended third with 16.3% of the popular vote. [34] Contemporary Argentine liberal socialists include Mario Bunge [35] and Juan José Sebreli. [36]

Belgium

Chantal Mouffe is a prominent Belgian advocate of liberal socialism. [37] She describes liberal socialism as the following:

To deepen and enrich the pluralist conquests of liberal democracy, the articulation between political liberalism and individualism must be broken, to make possible a new approach to individuality that restores its social nature without reducing it to a simple component of an organic whole. This is where the socialist tradition of thought might still have something to contribute to the democratic project and herein lies the promise of a liberal socialism. [37]

Britain

John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill, influential 19th-century English thinker of liberalism who adopted some socialist views John Stuart Mill by London Stereoscopic Company, c1870.jpg
John Stuart Mill, influential 19th-century English thinker of liberalism who adopted some socialist views

The main liberal English thinker John Stuart Mill's early economic philosophy was one of free markets. However, he accepted interventions in the economy such as a tax on alcohol, if there were sufficient utilitarian grounds. He also accepted the principle of legislative intervention for the purpose of animal welfare. [38] Mill originally believed that equality of taxation meant equality of sacrifice and that progressive taxation penalised those who worked harder and saved more and therefore was a "mild form of robbery". [39]

Given an equal tax rate regardless of income, Mill agreed that inheritance should be taxed. A utilitarian society would agree that everyone should be equal one way or another. Therefore, receiving inheritance would put one ahead of society unless taxed on the inheritance. Those who donate should consider and choose carefully where their money goes—some charities are more deserving than others. Considering public charities boards such as a government will disburse the money equally. However, a private charity board like a church would disburse the monies fairly to those who are in more need than others. [40]

Mill later altered his views toward a more socialist bent, adding chapters to his Principles of Political Economy in defence of a socialist outlook and defending some socialist causes. [41] Within this revised work, he also made the radical proposal that the whole wage system be abolished in favour of a co-operative wage system. [42] Nonetheless, some of his views on the idea of flat taxation remained, [43] albeit altered in the third edition of the Principles of Political Economy to reflect a concern for differentiating restrictions on unearned incomes which he favoured; and those on earned incomes which he did not favour. [44]

In the case of Oxford University, Mill's Principles of Political Economy, first published in 1848, was the standard text until 1919 when it was replaced by Alfred Marshall's Principles of Economics . As Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations had during an earlier period, Mill's Principles of Economy dominated economics teaching and was one of the most widely read of all books on economics in the period. [45]

In later editions of Principles of Political Economy, Mill would argue that "as far as economic theory was concerned, there is nothing in principle in economic theory that precludes an economic order based on socialist policies". [46] At some point, Mill also promoted substituting capitalist businesses with worker cooperatives, [47] writing:

The form of association, however, which if mankind continue to improve, must be expected in the end to predominate, is not that which can exist between a capitalist as chief, and work-people without a voice in the management, but the association of the labourers themselves on terms of equality, collectively owning the capital with which they carry on their operations, and working under managers elected and removable by themselves. [48]

Ethical socialism

R. H. Tawney, founder of ethical socialism R. H. Tawney.jpg
R. H. Tawney, founder of ethical socialism

Liberal socialism has exercised influence in British politics, especially in the variant known as ethical socialism. [49] A key component of ethical socialism is in its emphasis on moral and ethical critiques of capitalism and building a case for socialism on moral or spiritual grounds as opposed to rationalist and materialist grounds. Ethical socialists advocated a mixed economy that involves an acceptance of a role of both public enterprise as well as socially responsible private enterprise. [50] Ethical socialism was founded by Christian socialist R. H. Tawney and its ideals were also connected to Fabian and guild-socialist values. [51]

It emphasises the need for a morally conscious economy based upon the principles of service, cooperation and social justice while opposing possessive individualism. [52] Ethical socialism is distinct in its focus on criticism of the ethics of capitalism and not merely criticism of material issues of capitalism. Tawney denounced the self-seeking amoral and immoral behaviour that he claimed is supported by capitalism. [53] He opposed what he called the "acquisitive society" that causes private property to be used to transfer surplus profit to "functionless owners"—capitalist rentiers. [52] However, Tawney did not denounce managers as a whole, believing that management and employees could join together in a political alliance for reform. [52] He supported the pooling of surplus profit through means of progressive taxation to redistribute these funds to provide social welfare, including public health care, public education and public housing. [54]

Tawney advocated nationalisation of strategic industries and services. [55] He also advocated worker participation in the business of management in the economy as well as consumer, employee, employer and state cooperation in the economy. [55] Though he supported a substantial role for public enterprise in the economy, Tawney stated that where private enterprise provided a service that was commensurate with its rewards that was functioning private property, then a business could be usefully and legitimately be left in private hands. [50] Ethical socialist Thomas Hill Green supported the right of equal opportunity for all individuals to be able freely appropriate property, but he claimed that acquisition of wealth did not imply that an individual could do whatever they wanted to once that wealth was in their possession. Green opposed "property rights of the few" that were preventing the ownership of property by the many. [56]

Ethical socialism is an important ideology of the British Labour Party. Labour Prime Minister Clement Attlee supported the ideology, which played a large role in his party's policies during the postwar 1940s. [57] Half a century after Attlee's tenure, Tony Blair, another Labour Prime Minister, also described himself as an adherent of ethical socialism, which for him embodies the values of "social justice, the equal worth of each citizen, equality of opportunity, community". [58] Influenced by Attlee and John Macmurray (who himself was influenced by Green), [59] Blair has defined the ideology in similar terms as earlier adherents—with an emphasis on the common good, rights and responsibilities as well as support of an organic society in which individuals flourish through cooperation. [59] Blair argued that Labour ran into problems in the 1960s and 1970s when it abandoned ethical socialism and that its recovery required a return to the values promoted by the Attlee government. [6] However, Blair's critics (both inside and outside Labour) have accused him of completely abandoning socialism in favour of capitalism. [60]

Germany

Willy Brandt, Chancellor of West Germany (1969-1974) Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F057884-0009, Willy Brandt.jpg
Willy Brandt, Chancellor of West Germany (1969–1974)

An early version of liberal socialism was developed in Germany by Franz Oppenheimer. [61] Although he was committed to socialism, Oppenheimer's theories inspired the development of the social liberalism that was pursued by German Chancellor Ludwig Erhard, who said the following: "As long as I live, I will not forget Franz Oppenheimer! I will be as happy if the social market economy—as perfect or imperfect as it might be—continues to bear witness to the work, to the intellectual stance of the ideas and teachings of Franz Oppenheimer". [61]

In the 1930s, the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), a reformist socialist political party that was up to then based upon revisionist Marxism, began a transition away from Marxism towards liberal socialism. After it was banned by the Nazi regime in 1933, the SPD acted in exile through the Sopade. In 1934, the Sopade began to publish material that indicated that the SPD was turning towards liberal socialism. [62]

Curt Heyer  [ de ], a prominent proponent of liberal socialism within the Sopade, declared that Sopade represented the tradition of Weimar Republic social democracy (a form of liberal democratic socialism) and declared that Sopade's held true to its mandate of traditional liberal principles combined with the political realism of socialism. [63] After the restoration of democracy in West Germany, the SPD's Godesberg Program in 1959 eliminated the party's remaining Marxist policies. The SPD then became officially based upon liberal socialism (German : freiheitlicher Sozialismus). [64] West German Chancellor Willy Brandt has been identified as a liberal socialist. [65]

Hungary

In 1919, the Hungarian politician Oszkár Jászi declared his support for what he termed "liberal socialism" while denouncing "communist socialism". [66] Opposed to classical social democracy's prevalent focus on support from the working class, Jászi saw the middle class and smallholder peasants as essential to the development of socialism and spoke of the need of a "radical middle-class". [66] His views were especially influenced by events in Hungary in 1919 involving the Bolshevik revolution during which he specifically denounced the Marxist worldview shortly after the collapse of the Hungarian Soviet Republic, calling his views "Anti-Marx". His criticism of orthodox Marxism was centered on its mechanical and value-free and amoral methodology. [67] He argued that "[i]n no small measure, the present terrible, bewildering world crisis is a consequence of Marxism's mechanical Communism and amoral nihilism. New formulas of spirit, freedom and solidarity have to be found". [67]

Jászi promoted a form of co-operative socialism that included liberal principles of freedom, voluntarism and decentralization. [66] He counterpoised this ideal version of socialism with the then-existing political system in the Soviet Union, which he identified as based upon dictatorial and militarist perils, statism and a crippled economic order where competition and quality are disregarded. [68]

Jászi's views on socialism and especially his works justifying the denouncement of Bolshevik communism came back into Hungarian public interest in the 1980s when copies of his manuscripts were discovered and were smuggled into Hungary that was then under communist party-rule. [68]

Italy

Carlo Rosselli, Italian proponent of liberal socialism Carlo Rosselli 1.jpg
Carlo Rosselli, Italian proponent of liberal socialism

Italian socialist Carlo Rosselli was inspired by the definition of socialism by the founder of social democracy, Eduard Bernstein, who defined socialism as "organised liberalism". Rosselli expanded on Bernstein's arguments by developing his notion of liberal socialism (Italian : socialismo liberale). [69] In 1925, Rosselli defined the ideology in his work of the same name in which he supported the type of socialist economy defined by socialist economist Werner Sombart in Der modern Kapitalismus (1908) that envisaged a new modern mixed economy that included both public and private property, limited economic competition and increased economic cooperation. [70]

While appreciating principles of liberalism as an ideology that emphasised liberation, Rosselli was deeply disappointed with liberalism as a system that he described as having been used by the bourgeoisie to support their privileges while neglecting the liberation components of liberalism as an ideology and thus viewed conventional liberalism as a system that had merely become an ideology of "bourgeois capitalism". [71] At the same time, Rosselli appreciated socialism as an ideology, but he was also deeply disappointed with conventional socialism as a system. [72]

In response to his disappointment with conventional socialism in practice, Roselli declared: "The recent experiences, all the experiences of the past thirty years, have hopelessly condemned the primitive programs of the socialists. State socialism especially—collectivist, centralising socialism—has been defeated". [72] Rosselli's liberal socialism was partly based upon his study and admiration of British political themes of the Fabian Society and John Stuart Mill (he was able to read the English versions of Mill's work On Liberty prior to its availability in Italian that began in 1925). His admiration of British socialism increased after his visit to the United Kingdom in 1923 where he met George Drumgoole Coleman, R. H. Tawney and other members of the Fabian Society. [73]

An important component of Italian liberal socialism developed by Rosselli was its anti-fascism. [74] Rosselli opposed fascism and believed that fascism would only be defeated by a revival of socialism. [74] Rosselli founded Giustizia e Libertà as a resistance movement founded in the 1930s in opposition to the Fascist regime in Italy. [75] Ferruccio Parri—who later became Prime Minister of Italy—and Sandro Pertini—who later became President of Italy—were among Giustizia e Libertà's leaders. [71] Giustizia e Libertà was committed to militant action to fight the Fascist regime and it saw Benito Mussolini as a ruthless murderer who himself deserved to be killed as punishment. [76] Various early schemes were designed by the movement in the 1930s to assassinate Mussolini, including one dramatic plan of using an aircraft to drop a bomb on Piazza Venezia where Mussolini resided. [74] Rosselli was also a prominent member of the liberal-socialist Action Party. [77]

Sandro Pertini, President of Italy (1978-1985) Pertini ritratto.jpg
Sandro Pertini, President of Italy (1978–1985)

After Rosselli's death, liberal socialism was developed in Italian political thought by Guido Calogero  [ it ]. [21] Unlike Rosselli, Calogero considered the ideology as a unique ideology called liberalsocialism (Italian: liberalsocialismo) that was separate from existing liberal and socialist ideologies. [21] Calogero created the "First Manifesto of Liberalsocialism" in 1940 [78] that stated the following:

At the basis of liberalsocialism stands the concept of the substantial unity and identity of ideal reason, which supports and justifies socialism in its demand for justice as much as it does liberalism in its demand for liberty. This ideal reason coincides with that same ethical principle to whose rule humanity and civilization, both past and future, must always measure up. This is the principle by which we recognize the personhood of others in contrast to our own person and assign to each of them a right to own their own. [78]

After World War II, Ferruccio Parri of the liberal socialist Action Party briefly served as Prime Minister of Italy in 1945. [79] In 1978, liberal socialist Sandro Pertini of the Italian Socialist Party was elected President of Italy in 1978 and served as President until 1985. [80]

See also

Related Research Articles

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on economic freedom. Closely related to economic liberalism, it developed in the early 19th century, building on ideas from the previous century as a response to urbanisation and to the Industrial Revolution in Europe and North America.

Socialism is a political, social, and economic philosophy encompassing a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production and workers' self-management of enterprises. It includes the political theories and movements associated with such systems. Social ownership can be public, collective, cooperative or of equity. While no single definition encapsulates many types of socialism, social ownership is the one common element. Socialist systems are divided into non-market and market forms. Non-market socialism substitutes factor markets and money with integrated economic planning and engineering or technical criteria based on calculation performed in-kind, thereby producing a different economic mechanism that functions according to different economic laws and dynamics than those of capitalism. A non-market socialist system therefore eliminates the inefficiencies and crises traditionally associated with capital accumulation and the profit system in capitalism. The socialist calculation debate, originated by the economic calculation problem, concerns the feasibility and methods of resource allocation for a planned socialist system. By contrast, market socialism retains the use of monetary prices, factor markets and in some cases the profit motive, with respect to the operation of socially owned enterprises and the allocation of capital goods between them. Profits generated by these firms would be controlled directly by the workforce of each firm or accrue to society at large in the form of a social dividend.

Anti-capitalism Political ideology and movement opposed to capitalism

Anti-capitalism is a political ideology and movement encompassing a variety of attitudes and ideas that oppose capitalism. In this sense, anti-capitalists are those who wish to replace capitalism with another type of economic system, usually some form of socialism.

Christian democracy is a political ideology that emerged in 19th-century Europe under the influence of Catholic social teaching, as well as Neo-Calvinism. Christian democratic political ideology advocates for a commitment to social market principles and qualified interventionism. It was conceived as a combination of modern democratic ideas and traditional Christian values, incorporating the social teachings espoused by the Catholic, Lutheran, Reformed, and Pentecostal traditions in various parts of the world. After World War II, the Protestant and Catholic movements of the Social Gospel and Neo-Thomism, respectively, played a role in shaping Christian democracy. Christian democracy continues to be influential in Europe and Latin America, although it is also present in other parts of the world.

Centre-right politics or center-right politics, also referred to as moderate-right politics, are politics that lean to the right of the left–right political spectrum, but are closer to the centre than other right-wing politics. From the 1780s to the 1880s, there was a shift in the Western world of social class structure and the economy, moving away from the nobility and mercantilism, as well as moving toward the bourgeoisie and capitalism. This general economic shift toward capitalism affected centre-right movements such as the British Conservative Party, that responded by becoming supportive of capitalism.

Fascism and ideology

The history of fascist ideology is long and draws on many sources. Fascists took inspiration from sources as ancient as the Spartans for their focus on racial purity and their emphasis on rule by an elite minority. Fascism has also been connected to the ideals of Plato, though there are key differences between the two. Fascism styled itself as the ideological successor to Rome, particularly the Roman Empire. The concept of a "high and noble" Aryan culture as opposed to a "parasitic" Semitic culture was core to Nazi racial views. From the same era, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's view on the absolute authority of the state also strongly influenced Fascist thinking. The French Revolution was a major influence insofar as the Nazis saw themselves as fighting back against many of the ideas which it brought to prominence, especially liberalism, liberal democracy and racial equality, whereas on the other hand Fascism drew heavily on the revolutionary ideal of nationalism. Common themes among fascist movements include; nationalism, hierarchy and elitism, militarism, quasi-religion, masculinity and philosophy. Other aspects of fascism such as its "myth of decadence", anti‐egalitarianism and totalitarianism can be seen to originate from these ideas. These fundamental aspects however, can be attributed to a concept known as "Palingenetic ultranationalism", a theory proposed by Roger Griffin, that fascism is a synthesis of totalitarianism and ultranationalism sacralized through myth of national rebirth and regeneration.

The Godesberg Program was the party program outline of the political course of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD). It was ratified on 15 November 1959 at an SPD party convention in the town of Bad Godesberg which is today part of Bonn. The Godesberg program represented a fundamental change in the orientation and goals of the SPD. It rejected the goal of replacing capitalism, adopting a commitment to reform capitalism and a people's party orientation that appealed to ethical considerations and ejected its class-based orientation. Godesberg rejected nationalization as a major principle of socialism.

Right-libertarianism type of libertarianism supporting capitalist property rights and private natural resources

Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism or right-wing libertarianism, is a political philosophy and type of libertarianism that supports capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of natural resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property and capital from left-libertarianism, a type of libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural resources. In contrast to socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports free-market capitalism. Like most forms of libertarianism, it supports civil liberties, especially natural law, negative rights and a major reversal of the modern welfare state.

Integral humanism was a set of concepts drafted by Deendayal Upadhyaya as a political program and adopted in 1965 as the official doctrine of the Jan Sangh. Upadhyaya borrowed the Gandhian principles such as sarvodaya, swadeshi (domestic), and Gram Swaraj and these principles were appropriated selectively to give more importance to cultural-national values. These values were based on an individual's undisputed subservience to nation as a corporate entity. Richard Fox has characterised this as "ideological hijacking" and a "transplant" that was designed with a purpose to appropriate the authority that the Gandhian idioms had on Indian politics.

Crawford Brough Macpherson (1911–1987) was an influential Canadian political scientist who taught political theory at the University of Toronto.

Social democracy is a political, social and economic philosophy within socialism that supports political and economic democracy. As a policy regime, it is described by academics as advocating economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist-oriented mixed economy. The protocols and norms used to accomplish this involve a commitment to representative and participatory democracy, measures for income redistribution, regulation of the economy in the general interest and social-welfare provisions. Due to longstanding governance by social-democratic parties during the post-war consensus and their influence on socioeconomic policy in Northern and Western Europe, social democracy became associated with Keynesianism, the Nordic model, the social-liberal paradigm and welfare states within political circles in the late 20th century. It has been described as the most common form of Western or modern socialism as well as the reformist wing of democratic socialism. While having socialism as a long-term goal, social democracy seeks to humanize capitalism and create the conditions for it to lead to greater democratic, egalitarian and solidaristic outcomes. It is characterized by a commitment to policies aimed at curbing inequality, eliminating oppression of underprivileged groups and eradicating poverty as well as support for universally accessible public services like care for the elderly, child care, education, health care and workers' compensation. It often has strong connections with the labour movement and trade unions, being supportive of collective bargaining rights for workers and measures to extend decision-making beyond politics into the economic sphere in the form of co-determination for employees and stakeholders.

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights, capitalism, democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion. Yellow is the political colour most commonly associated with liberalism.

Economic liberalism Capitalism that prioritizes individuals as consumers over collective institutions or NGOs

Economic liberalism is a political and economic philosophy based on strong support for a market economy and private property in the means of production. Although economic liberals can also be supportive of government regulation to a certain degree, they tend to oppose government intervention in the free market when it inhibits free trade and open competition. Economic liberalism has been described as representing the economic expression of liberalism.

Paternalistic conservatism is a strand in conservatism which reflects the belief that societies exist and develop organically and that members within them have obligations towards each other. There is particular emphasis on the paternalistic obligation of those who are privileged and wealthy to the poorer parts of society. Consistent with principles such as duty, hierarchy and organicism, it can be seen an outgrowth of traditionalist conservatism. Paternal conservatives support neither the individual nor the state in principle, but are instead prepared to support either or recommend a balance between the two depending on what is most practical.

Democratic socialism is a political philosophy supporting political democracy within a socially owned economy, with a particular emphasis on economic democracy, workplace democracy and workers' self-management within a market socialist economy or some form of a decentralised planned socialist economy. Democratic socialists argue that capitalism is inherently incompatible with the values of freedom, equality and solidarity and that these ideals can only be achieved through the realisation of a socialist society. Although most democratic socialists seek a gradual transition to socialism, democratic socialism can support either revolutionary or reformist politics as means to establish socialism. As a term, democratic socialism was popularised by social democrats who were opposed to the authoritarian socialist development in Russia and elsewhere during the 20th century.

Types of socialism include the range of man-made economic and social systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production and organizational self-management of enterprises as well as the political theories and movements associated with socialism. Social ownership may refer to forms of public, collective or cooperative ownership, or to citizen ownership of equity in which surplus value goes to the working class and hence society as a whole. There are many varieties of socialism and no single definition encapsulates all of them, but social ownership is the common element shared by its various forms.

Ethical socialism is a political philosophy that appeals to socialism on ethical and moral grounds as opposed to economic, egoistic, and consumeristic grounds. It emphasizes the need for a morally conscious economy based upon the principles of altruism, cooperation, and social justice while opposing possessive individualism.

Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR is a work of political economy written by Josef Stalin in 1951. It was one of the last works published before his death. In it, he made the claim that the Soviet Union had reached the lower stage of communism. The main impetus for the book came from the discussions around the preparations for a new textbook on political economy that would be standard throughout the communist movement. One of the main theoretical debates was on whether the law of value still operated within a socialist economy. Some economists claimed that Karl Marx in Das Kapital had only meant for it to apply to capitalist exchange, but Stalin insisted that it still operated under a socialist economy. Nonetheless, he argued that it was a historical and not eternal law and that it would disappear in the second higher stage of communism. Under socialism, it was necessary for commodity exchange and trained "business executives to conduct production on rational lines and disciplines them".

References

  1. 1 2 Gaus & Kukathas 2004, p. 420.
  2. 1 2 Adams 1999, p. 127, "Social Democracy to New Labour".
  3. Pugliese 1999, p. 99; Thompson 2006, pp. 60–61.
  4. Docherty & Lamb 2006, pp. 1–2.
  5. Bartlett 1970, p. 32: "Liberal socialism, for example, is unequivocally in favour of the free market economy and of freedom of action for the individual and recognises in legalistic and artificial monopolies the real evils of capitalism."
  6. 1 2 3 Bastow & Martin 2003, p. 72.
  7. Pierson 1995, p. 71: "If the contrast which 1989 highlights is not that between socialism in the East and liberal democracy in the West, the latter must be recognized to have been shaped, reformed and compromised by a century of social democratic pressure. Whatever the recent ascendancy in some quarters of neo-liberal parties and/or policies, social democratic forces remain deeply entrenched in the social fabric. In practice, social democratic and socialist parties within the constitutional arena in the West have almost always been involved in a politics of compromise with existing capitalist institutions (to whatever far distant prize its eyes might from time to time have been lifted). These have always been grounds for condemnation by those 'further to the left'. Yet, if advocates of the death of socialism accept that social democrats belong within the socialist camp, as I think they must, then the contrast between socialism (in all its variants) and liberal democracy must collapse. For actually existing liberal democracy is, in substantial part, a product of socialist (social democratic) forces."
  8. Hunt 2015, p. 112–113.
  9. Rosselli 1994, p. 51.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Urbinati 2007, p. 101.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dale 2016, "Bourgeois Radicalism: A Hegemonic Project".
  12. 1 2 Fried 2004, p. 66.
  13. Tyler 2012, pp. 259–280.
  14. 1 2 3 Doležalová 2018, pp. 95–96.
  15. Kates 1989.
  16. 1 2 Dale 2016, p. 61.
  17. Brown 2007, p. 237; Dale 2016, "Bourgeois Radicalism: A Hegemonic Project".
  18. Rosselli 1994, p. 51; Weinstein 1998: "[C]ooperation is, of course, arguably a form of socialism as much as form of liberalism."; Offer 2000, p. 137: "Several labels might be tied to this family member; the practitioners favoured "moral or liberal socialism," at times "socialism of the will."; Dale 2016, "Bourgeois Radicalism: A Hegemonic Project"; Bobbio 2015, p. 6: "One handbook of socialist propaganda advised readers to "first read any summary of Darwin and Spencer that gives the student the general direction of modern thought, then turn to Marx to complete the formidable triad that worthily makes up the gospel of contemporary Socialists."
  19. Cirillo 1980, p. 295; Fried 2004, p. 66; Potier 2011, p. 114; De Buen 2019: "Interestingly, Walras was a self-described socialist (albeit with some qualifications). His brand of socialism is closer to what is now commonly referred to as Georgism, due to American economist Henry George (though Walras first published on the subject in 1861, a few years before George). Walras advocated for a free market economy in which capital, production, and exchange remain in the hands of private actors. However, he also proposed the full socialization of the product of land. This included, not only taxation on land value but even the repurchase of all land by the state so that it could be publicly owned and land rents could become socialized wealth."; Muellwe 2020.
  20. Davidson 1995; Urbinati 2007, p. 101.
  21. 1 2 3 Bresser-Pereira 2004, p. 84.
  22. 1 2 Gamble & Wright 1999, p. 166, "'Rights and Responsabilities': A Social Democratic Perspective".
  23. Bresser-Pereira 2004, p. 104.
  24. Litván 2006, p. 125; Dale 2016, "Bourgeois Radicalism: A Hegemonic Project".
  25. Dardot & Laval 2014, p. 39.
  26. Rep 2000, p. 238; Dale 2016, "Bourgeois Radicalism: A Hegemonic Project"; Doležalová 2018, p. 95.
  27. Davidson 1995; Kerr 2017.
  28. Dale 2016.
  29. Miller 2003, pp. 213–238.
  30. Brilhante & Rocha 2010, pp. 17–27.
  31. Boyd & Harrison 2003, pp. 220–222; Anton & Schmitt 2012, pp. 3–4.
  32. Rodríguez Braun 2019.
  33. Morales Brito 2014, pp. 115–118.
  34. Rey 2003.
  35. Bunge 2016, pp. 345–347; Katy 2019, pp. 513–534.
  36. Rey 2003; García 2018.
  37. 1 2 Coperías-Aguilar 2000, p. 39.
  38. Linzey 2002; Morris 2002.
  39. Pellerin 2009.
  40. Strasser 1991.
  41. Bentham & Mill 2004, p. 11.
  42. Wilson 2007, "Political Economy"; Hill 2020, p. 52.
  43. Wilson 2007, "Political Economy".
  44. Mill 1852, "On The General Principles of Taxation, V.2.14". The passage about flat taxation was altered by the author in this edition which is acknowledged in this edition's footnote 8: "This sentence replaced in the 3rd ed. a sentence of the original: "It is partial taxation, which is a mild form of robbery."
  45. Ekelund Jr. & Hébert 1997, p. 172.
  46. Wilson 2007, "Political Economy"; Baum 2007: "Mill, in contrast, advances a form of liberal democratic socialism for the enlargement of freedom as well as to realize social and distributive justice. He offers a powerful account of economic injustice and justice that is centered on his understanding of freedom and its conditions."
  47. Schwartz 2012, p. 219.
  48. Mill 1848, "IV.7.21."
  49. Dearlove & Saunders 2000, p. 427; Thompson 2006, p. 52.
  50. 1 2 Thompson 2006, pp. 60–61.
  51. Thompson 2006, pp. 52, 58, 60.
  52. 1 2 3 Thompson 2006, p. 58.
  53. Thompson 2006, p. 52.
  54. Thompson 2006, pp. 58–59.
  55. 1 2 Thompson 2006, p. 59.
  56. Carter 2003, p. 35.
  57. Howell 2006, pp. 130–132.
  58. Jackson & Tansey 2008, p. 97.
  59. 1 2 Carter 2003, pp. 189–190.
  60. Elliott, Faucher-King & Le Galès 2010, p. 18.
  61. 1 2 Rep 2000, p. 238.
  62. Edinger 1956, p. 215.
  63. Edinger 1956, pp. 219–220.
  64. Orlow 2000, p. 108.
  65. Bronner 1999, p. 104.
  66. 1 2 3 Litván 2006, p. 125.
  67. 1 2 Litván 2006, p. 199.
  68. 1 2 Litván 2006, p. 200.
  69. Rosselli 1994; Steger 2006, p. 146.
  70. Pugliese 1999, p. 99.
  71. 1 2 Pugliese 1999, p. 51.
  72. 1 2 Pugliese 1999, p. 53.
  73. Pugliese 1999, pp. 59–60.
  74. 1 2 3 Dombroski 2001, p. 122.
  75. Wilkinson 1981, p. 224.
  76. Di Scala 1996, p. 87.
  77. Bastow & Martin 2003, p. 74.
  78. 1 2 Bastow & Martin 2003, p. 84.
  79. Pugliese 1999, pp. 59–60, 236.
  80. Pugliese 1999, p. 236.

Bibliography

Further reading