Mario Bunge

Last updated • 8 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

Mario Bunge
MarioBungesmall.jpg
Bunge in 2007
Born
Mario Augusto Bunge

(1919-09-21)September 21, 1919
Florida Oeste, Buenos Aires, Argentina
DiedFebruary 24, 2020(2020-02-24) (aged 100)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Education National University of La Plata (PhD, 1952)
Spouse(s)
Julia Delfina Molina y Vedia
​
​
(m. 1940,divorced)​
[1]
​
(m. 1958)​
Children4
Era Contemporary philosophy
Region Western philosophy
School
Main interests
Notable ideas

Mario Augusto Bunge ( /ˈbʊŋɡeɪ/ BUUNG-gay; [2] Spanish: [ˈmaɾjoˈβuŋxe] ; September 21, 1919 – February 24, 2020) was an Argentine-Canadian philosopher and physicist. His philosophical writings combined scientific realism, systemism, materialism, emergentism, and other principles.

Contents

He was an advocate of "exact philosophy" [3] : 211  and a critic of existentialist, hermeneutical, phenomenological philosophy, and postmodernism. [3] : 172  He was popularly known for his opinions against pseudoscience.

Early and personal life

Bunge was born on September 21, 1919, in Florida Oeste, Buenos Aires. [4] : 1  His mother, Marie Herminie Müser, was a German nurse who left Germany just before the beginning of World War I. [3] : 1–2  His father, Augusto Bunge, also of some German descent, was an Argentine physician and socialist legislator. [3] : 1–2  Mario, who was the couple's only child, was raised without any religious education, and enjoyed a happy and stimulating childhood in the outskirts of Buenos Aires. [3] : 1–22 

Bunge had four children: Carlos Federico and Mario Augusto Julio, with ex-wife Julia Delfina Molina y Vedia, [1] and Eric R. and Silvia A., with his wife of over 60 years, the Argentine mathematician Marta Cavallo. [3] : 5  Mario lived with Cavallo in Montreal from 1966 until his death, with one-year sabbaticals in other countries. [3] : 413 

Studies and career

Bunge began his studies at the National University of La Plata, graduating with a PhD in physico-mathematical sciences in 1952. [5] He was professor of theoretical physics and philosophy, 1956–1966, first at La Plata then at University of Buenos Aires. [5] His international debut was at the 1956 Inter-American Philosophical Congress in Santiago, Chile. He was particularly noticed there by Willard Van Orman Quine, who called Bunge the star of the congress. [6] He was, until his retirement at age 90, the Frothingham Professor of Logic and Metaphysics at McGill University in Montreal, where he had been since 1966. [7] [8] [5]

In a review of Bunge's 2016 memoirs, Between Two Worlds: Memoirs of a Philosopher-Scientist, [3] James Alcock saw in Bunge "a man of exceedingly high confidence who has lived his life guided by strong principles about truth, science, and justice" and one who is "[impatient] with muddy thinking". [9]

He became a centenarian in September 2019. A Festschrift was published to mark the occasion, with essays by an international collection of scholars. [10] He died in Montreal, Canada, on February 24, 2020, at the age of 100. [11] [12]

Political views

Bunge defined himself as a left-wing liberal and democratic socialist, in the tradition of John Stuart Mill and José Ingenieros. [3] : 345–347  [13] He was a supporter of the Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly, an organisation which advocates for democratic reform in the United Nations, and the creation of a more accountable international political system. [14]

Work

Philosophy

Bunge was a prolific intellectual, having written more than 400 papers and 80 books, notably his monumental Treatise on Basic Philosophy in eight volumes (1974–1989), a comprehensive and rigorous study of those philosophical aspects Bunge takes to be the core of modern philosophy: semantics, ontology, epistemology, philosophy of science and ethics. [5] In his Treatise, Bunge developed a comprehensive scientific outlook which he then applied to the various natural and social sciences.

His work is based on global systemism, emergentism, rationalism, scientific realism, materialism and consequentialism. [15] Bunge repeatedly and explicitly denied being a logical positivist, [16] and wrote on metaphysics. [17]

A variety of scientists and philosophers influenced his thought. Among those thinkers, Bunge explicitly acknowledged the direct influence of his own father, the Argentine physician Augusto Bunge, the Czech physicist Guido Beck, the Argentine mathematician Alberto González Domínguez, the Argentine mathematician, physicist and computer scientist Manuel Sadosky, the Italian sociologist and psychologist Gino Germani, the American sociologist Robert King Merton, and the French-Polish epistemologist Émile Meyerson. [3]

Among many frameworks that Bunge proposed was a five-stage model of the maturation of science from immature prescience to mature tetartoscience: see Protoscience § Developmental stages of science. [18]

Popularly, he is known for his remarks considering psychoanalysis as an example of pseudoscience. [19] He was critical of the ideas of well known scientists and philosophers such as Karl Popper, Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould, and Daniel Dennett. [9]

Bunge appreciated some aspects of Popper's critical rationalism but found it insufficient as a comprehensive philosophy of science, [20] and instead formulated his own account of scientific realism. [21] John R. Wettersen, who defined "critical rationalism" more broadly than Popper's work, called Bunge's theory of science "a version of critical rationalism". [22]

Philosophy of social sciences

Bunge addressed issues of theory and method in the social sciences starting with his Treatise on Basic Philosophy and later in his career wrote two books entirely focused on the social sciences: Finding Philosophy in Social Science (1996) and Social Science under Debate: A Philosophical Perspective (1998). In these works he argued for an approach to the study of societies that he called systemism, an alternative to holism and individualism. He was an advocate for what he called mechanismic explanations and defended the view that social mechanisms are processes "in a concrete system, such that it is capable of bringing about or preventing some change in the system as a whole or in some of its subsystems". [23]

Awards

Bunge was the recipient of many awards throughout his career. [4] : 2 

Bunge was also distinguished with twenty-one honorary doctorates and four honorary professorships by universities from both the Americas and Europe. [25] He is in the "Science Hall of Fame" [4] : 2  featured in Science in 2011. [26]

Selected publications

See also

Related Research Articles

Logical positivism, later called logical empiricism, and both of which together are also known as neopositivism, is a movement whose central thesis is the verification principle. This theory of knowledge asserts that only statements verifiable through direct observation or logical proof are meaningful in terms of conveying truth value, information or factual content. Starting in the late 1920s, groups of philosophers, scientists, and mathematicians formed the Berlin Circle and the Vienna Circle, which, in these two cities, would propound the ideas of logical positivism.

In the philosophy of science, protoscience is a research field that has the characteristics of an undeveloped science that may ultimately develop into an established science. Philosophers use protoscience to understand the history of science and distinguish protoscience from science and pseudoscience. The word “protoscience” is a hybrid Greek-Latin compound of the roots proto- + scientia, meaning a first or primeval rational knowledge.

Philosophy of science is the branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science. Amongst its central questions are the difference between science and non-science, the reliability of scientific theories, and the ultimate purpose and meaning of science as a human endeavour. Philosophy of science focuses on metaphysical, epistemic and semantic aspects of scientific practice, and overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, logic, and epistemology, for example, when it explores the relationship between science and the concept of truth. Philosophy of science is both a theoretical and empirical discipline, relying on philosophical theorising as well as meta-studies of scientific practice. Ethical issues such as bioethics and scientific misconduct are often considered ethics or science studies rather than the philosophy of science.

Scientism is the belief that science and the scientific method are the best or only way to render truth about the world and reality.

In philosophy of science and in epistemology, instrumentalism is a methodological view that ideas are useful instruments, and that the worth of an idea is based on how effective it is in explaining and predicting natural phenomena. According to instrumentalists, a successful scientific theory reveals nothing known either true or false about nature's unobservable objects, properties or processes. Scientific theory is merely a tool whereby humans predict observations in a particular domain of nature by formulating laws, which state or summarize regularities, while theories themselves do not reveal supposedly hidden aspects of nature that somehow explain these laws. Instrumentalism is a perspective originally introduced by Pierre Duhem in 1906.

Scientific realism is the view that the universe described by science is real regardless of how it may be interpreted. A believer of scientific realism takes the universe as described by science to be true, because of their assertion that science can be used to find the truth about both the physical and metaphysical in the Universe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Critical rationalism</span> Epistemological philosophy advanced by Karl Popper

Critical rationalism is an epistemological philosophy advanced by Karl Popper on the basis that, if a statement cannot be logically deduced, it might nevertheless be possible to logically falsify it. Following Hume, Popper rejected any inductive logic that is ampliative, i.e., any logic that can provide more knowledge than deductive logic. This led Popper to his falsifiability criterion.

Philosophical realism—usually not treated as a position of its own but as a stance towards other subject matters— is the view that a certain kind of thing has mind-independent existence, i.e. that it exists even in the absence of any mind perceiving it or that its existence is not just a mere appearance in the eye of the beholder. This includes a number of positions within epistemology and metaphysics which express that a given thing instead exists independently of knowledge, thought, or understanding. This can apply to items such as the physical world, the past and future, other minds, and the self, though may also apply less directly to things such as universals, mathematical truths, moral truths, and thought itself. However, realism may also include various positions which instead reject metaphysical treatments of reality altogether.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans Albert</span> German philosopher (1921–2023)

Hans Albert was a German philosopher. He was professor of social sciences at the University of Mannheim from 1963, and remained at the university until 1989. His fields of research were social sciences and general studies of methods. He was a critical rationalist, paying special attention to rational heuristics. Albert was a strong critic of the continental hermeneutic tradition coming from Heidegger and Gadamer.

Philosophy in this sense means how social science integrates with other related scientific disciplines, which implies a rigorous, systematic endeavor to build and organize knowledge relevant to the interaction between individual people and their wider social involvement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Positivism</span> Empiricist philosophical theory

Positivism is a philosophical school that holds that all genuine knowledge is either true by definition or positive – meaning a posteriori facts derived by reason and logic from sensory experience. Other ways of knowing, such as intuition, introspection, or religious faith, are rejected or considered meaningless.

Formal science is a branch of science studying disciplines concerned with abstract structures described by formal systems, such as logic, mathematics, statistics, theoretical computer science, artificial intelligence, information theory, game theory, systems theory, decision theory and theoretical linguistics. Whereas the natural sciences and social sciences seek to characterize physical systems and social systems, respectively, using empirical methods, the formal sciences use language tools concerned with characterizing abstract structures described by formal systems. The formal sciences aid the natural and social sciences by providing information about the structures used to describe the physical world, and what inferences may be made about them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alan Musgrave</span> New Zealand philosopher

Alan Edward Musgrave is an English-born New Zealand philosopher.

The positivism dispute was a political-philosophical dispute between the critical rationalists and the Frankfurt School in 1961, about the methodology of the social sciences. It grew into a broad discussion within German sociology from 1961 to 1969. The naming itself is controversial, since it was the Frankfurt School proponents who accused the critical rationalists of being positivists—while the latter considered themselves to be opponents of positivism.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to epistemology:

Inductivism is the traditional and still commonplace philosophy of scientific method to develop scientific theories. Inductivism aims to neutrally observe a domain, infer laws from examined cases—hence, inductive reasoning—and thus objectively discover the sole naturally true theory of the observed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Agassi</span> Israeli academic (1927–2023)

Joseph Agassi was an Israeli academic with contributions in logic, scientific method, and philosophy. He studied under Karl Popper and taught at the London School of Economics.

Brian Ellis is an Australian philosopher. He is an Emeritus Professor in the philosophy department at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, and Professional Fellow in philosophy at the University of Melbourne. He was the Editor of the Australasian Journal of Philosophy for twelve years. He is one of the major proponents of the New Essentialist school of philosophy of science. In later years he has brought his understanding of scientific realism to the Social Sciences, developing the philosophy of Social Humanism. He was appointed a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities in 1972.

An index list of articles about the philosophy of science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Werner Leinfellner</span>

Werner Leinfellner was professor of philosophy at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and at the Vienna University of Technology. After recovering from life-threatening wounds during World War II, he studied chemistry and physics at the Universities of Vienna and Graz, eventually turning to the study of the philosophy of science, and receiving his Ph.D. in 1959. He moved to the United States in 1967, in part, because of problems faced by empirically oriented philosophers in obtaining academic positions in Austria and Germany. He is notable for his contributions to philosophy of science, as a member of European Academy of Sciences and Arts, for founding the journal Theory and Decision, for co-founding Theory and Decision Library, and for co-founding the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society and International Wittgenstein Symposium.

References

  1. 1 2 "Julia Delfina Molina y Vedia Rossi". Geneanet . Retrieved November 16, 2024.
  2. ↑ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine : Mario Bunge, philosopher and physicist. McGill University on YouTube. November 3, 2015. Event occurs at 0:03. Retrieved February 27, 2020. Interview with Bunge in which the interviewer gives a pronunciation of his name.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
  4. 1 2 3 4 Matthews, Michael R., ed. (2019). Mario Bunge: a Centenary Festschrift. Cham: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16673-1. ISBN   9783030166724. OCLC   1109956992. S2CID   264431501.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Fellows: Mario A. Bunge". John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. Archived from the original on June 22, 2011. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
  6. ↑ Matthews, Michael R. (July–August 2020). "Mario Bunge: Physicist, Philosopher, Champion of Science, Citizen of the World (1919–2020)". Skeptical Inquirer . Vol. 44, no. 4. Amherst, NY: Center for Inquiry. pp. 7–8.
  7. ↑ Spitzberg, Daniel (November 8, 2007). "Mario Bunge: Philosophy in flux". McGill Reporter. Archived from the original on December 13, 2007. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
  8. ↑ "Biography: Mario Bunge, PhD, FRSC". University of Ottawa. Archived from the original on February 15, 2009. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
  9. 1 2 Alcock, James (2017). "The Scientist and the Philosopher". Skeptical Inquirer . 41 (2): 58–61.
  10. ↑ Frazier, Kendrick (January–February 2020). "Science, Philosophy, and a Lifetime of Reason: A Mario Bunge Festschrift". Skeptical Inquirer . Vol. 44, no. 1. Amherst, New York: Center for Inquiry. p. 9.
  11. ↑ "Fallece a los cien años el filósofo argentino Mario Bunge". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). February 25, 2020.
  12. ↑ "Muere a los 100 años el físico y filósofo argentino Mario Bunge". CNN en Español (in Spanish). February 25, 2020.
  13. ↑ Kary, Michael (2019). "Ethical Politics and Political Ethics II: On Socialism Through Integral Democracy". In Matthews, Michael R. (ed.). Mario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift. Cham: Springer-Verlag. pp.  513–534. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16673-1_29. ISBN   9783030166724. OCLC   1109956992. S2CID   199359247.
  14. ↑ "Overview: Professors". Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly. Retrieved April 19, 2018.
  15. ↑ Bunge, Mario (1989). Ethics: The Good and the Right. Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Vol. 8. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel. p.  xiv. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2601-1. ISBN   9027728399. OCLC   19354927. This is the last volume of my Treatise on Basic Philosophy, on which I started to work two decades ago. It is consistent with the previous volumes, in particular with the naturalistic, dynamicist, emergentist and systemist ontology, as well as with the realistic and ratioempiricist semantics and epistemology formulated therein.
  16. ↑ Bunge 2016 , pp. 113, 335: "... mainly because of the vulgar confusion between scientism and positivism, I am often regarded as a positivist despite my many criticisms of positivism. ... When [Gino] Germani invited me to take part in the panel for the conference on science and positivism that he had organized, I assaulted positivism and thus provoked Gino's anger. I had not realized that, in that milieu, positivism was confused with scientism. ... I had read some of the genuine positivists, from Comte, Mach and Duhem to Reichenbach, Carnap and Philipp Rank, and had thoroughly criticized their attempt to interpret physics in anthropocentric terms, from sensation to measurement."
  17. ↑ See, for example, volumes 3 and 4 of his Treatise on Basic Philosophy.
  18. ↑ Bunge, Mario (1983). "Epistemic Change" . Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Vol. 6. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 158–161 (160). doi:10.1007/978-94-015-6921-7_4. ISBN   902771634X. OCLC   9759870.
  19. ↑ For example: Bud, Robert; Bunge, Mario (October 2010). "For and against psychoanalysis: Is psychoanalysis science or pseudoscience?". New Scientist . 208 (2780): 22–23. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(10)62400-1. See also: Bunge, Mario (2001). "Diagnosing pseudoscience". Philosophy in Crisis: The Need for Reconstruction . Prometheus lectures. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. pp.  161–189. ISBN   1573928437. OCLC   45123524.
  20. ↑ See, for example:
    • Bunge, Mario (1983). "Systematizing" . Epistemology & Methodology I: Exploring the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Vol. 5. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 323–376 (368). doi:10.1007/978-94-009-7027-4_10. ISBN   9027715114. OCLC   9412962. Because of all these differences between law statements and empirical generalizations, the empiricist epistemology, which favors the latter and mistrusts or even rejects the former, does not fit the facts of scientific practice. Nor does critical rationalism, for which all hypotheses are groundless, none being better than any others except that some resist better the attempts at refuting them (Popper, 1959, 1963, 1974).
    • Bunge, Mario (1983). "Producing Evidence" . Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Vol. 6. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 59–113 (70). doi:10.1007/978-94-015-6921-7_2. ISBN   902771634X. OCLC   9759870. Critical rationalism (e.g. Popper, 1959) agrees that experience is a test of theories (its only concern) but claims that only negative evidence counts (against), for positive evidence is too easy to come by. True, unsuccessful attempts to refute a theory (or discredit a proposal or an artifact) are more valuable than mere empirical confirmation. However, (a) the most general theories are not refutable, although they are indirectly confirmable by turning them into specific theories upon adjoining them specific hypotheses (Bunge, 1973b); (b) true (or approximately true) predictions are not that cheap, as shown by the predictive barrenness of pseudoscience; (c) positive evidence for the truth of an idea or the efficiency of a proposal, procedure, or artifact, does count: thus the US Food and Drug Administration will rightly demand positive evidence for the efficiency [efficacy] of a drug before permitting its marketing.
  21. ↑ See, for example, among secondary sources:
    • Quintanilla, Miguel A. (1982). "Materialist Foundations of Critical Rationalism". In Agassi, Joseph; Cohen, Robert S. (eds.). Scientific Philosophy Today. Boston Studies in the Philosophy Of Science. Vol. 67. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 225–237. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8462-2_14. ISBN   902771262X. OCLC   7596359. I will endeavor to demonstrate that Popper's theory of the three worlds is unacceptable, that Popper's arguments against materialism do not affect Bunge's ontology, and that starting from this ontology the foundations of rationality can be framed in a more consistent and more 'critical' manner.
    • Pickel, Andreas (June 2004). "Systems and Mechanisms: A Symposium on Mario Bunge's Philosophy of Social Science". Philosophy of the Social Sciences . 34 (2): 169–181. doi:10.1177/0048393103262549. S2CID   144665982. While his philosophy shares a great deal of common ground with the critical rationalism of Karl Popper (which Bunge [1996b] dubs 'logical negativism'), he is adamant that criticism, refutation, and falsification should not be overrated. Bunge, along with others (e.g., Bhaskar 1975; Keuth 1978; Trigg 1980; Rescher 1987; Lane 1996; Kukla 1998; Brante 2001), is advocating scientific realism as an alternative to both positivist and antipositivist approaches.
    • Agassi, Joseph; Bar-Am, Nimrod (2019). "Bunge contra Popper". In Matthews, Michael R. (ed.). Mario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift. Cham: Springer-Verlag. pp. 263–272. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16673-1_15. ISBN   9783030166724. OCLC   1089222139. S2CID   199318101. On three items, Bunge sharply criticizes Popper: on confirmations, on social institutions and on the mind-body problem. [...] Nevertheless, we need some sense of proportion. Seeing that Popper and Bunge are generally allies, in comparison with most philosophers around, we may then go into detail and try to contrast their views as best we can, starting with the most important disagreement.
  22. ↑ Wettersen, John R. "Karl Popper and Critical Rationalism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Retrieved January 10, 2021.
  23. ↑ Bunge, Mario (1997). "Mechanism and Explanation". Philosophy of the Social Sciences . 27 (4): 410–465 (414). doi:10.1177/004839319702700402. S2CID   143549022.
  24. ↑ "Ludwig von Bertalanffy Award in Complexity Thinking". bcsss.org. Retrieved September 21, 2019.
  25. ↑ Bar-Am, Nimrod; Gattei, Stefano, eds. (2017). "About the authors". Encouraging Openness: Essays for Joseph Agassi on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday. New York: Springer-Verlag. p.  568. ISBN   9783319576688.
  26. ↑ Bohannon, John (January 2011). "The Science Hall of Fame". Science . 331 (6014): 143. Bibcode:2011Sci...331..143B. doi: 10.1126/science.331.6014.143-c . PMID   21233362.
  27. ↑ Bunge's Treatise on Basic Philosophy stands as his major achievement. It encompasses a quadrivium which he considers "the nucleus of contemporary philosophy", namely, semantics (theories of meaning and truth), ontology (general theories of the world), epistemology (theories of knowledge), and ethics (theories of value and right action). For approximately two decades, Bunge engaged in writing his magnum opus to investigate and synthesize contemporary philosophy in a single grand system that is compatible with the advancement of modern human knowledge both scientifically and philosophically. Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Semantics (I & II), Ontology (III–IV), Epistemology and Methodology (V–VII) Axiology and Ethics (VIII). All of these 8 volumes in 9 parts are currently in print, available under the Springer-Verlag imprint.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.