Radical centrism

Last updated

Radical centrism (also called the radical center/centre or radical middle) is a political ideology that arose in the Western nations in the late 20th century. At first it was defined in a variety of ways, but at the beginning of the 21st century a number of political science texts gave it a more developed cast. [1] [2]

An ideology is a collection of normative beliefs and values that an individual or group holds for other than purely epistemic reasons. In other words, these rely on basic assumptions about reality that may or may not have any factual basis. The term is especially used to describe systems of ideas and ideals which form the basis of economic or political theories and resultant policies. In these there are tenuous causal links between policies and outcomes owing to the large numbers of variables available, so that many key assumptions have to be made. In political science the term is used in a descriptive sense to refer to political belief systems


The radical in the term refers to a willingness on the part of most radical centrists to call for fundamental reform of institutions. [3] The centrism refers to a belief that genuine solutions require realism and pragmatism, not just idealism and emotion. [4] One radical centrist text defines radical centrism as "idealism without illusions", [5] a phrase originally from John F. Kennedy. [6]

The term political radicalism denotes political principles focused on altering social structures through revolutionary or other means and changing value systems in fundamental ways.

Centrism describes a political outlook or specific position

In politics, centrism—the centre or the center —is a political outlook or specific position that involves acceptance or support of a balance of a degree of social equality and a degree of social hierarchy, while opposing political changes which would result in a significant shift of society strongly to either the left or the right.

In metaphysics, realism about a given object is the view that this object exists in reality independently of our conceptual scheme. In philosophical terms, these objects are ontologically independent of someone's conceptual scheme, perceptions, linguistic practices, beliefs, etc.

Radical centrists typically borrow ideas from the left, the right, and elsewhere, often melding them together. [1] Most support market-based solutions to social problems with strong governmental oversight in the public interest. [7] There is support for increased global engagement and the growth of an empowered middle class in developing countries. [8] Many radical centrists work within the major political parties, but also support independent or third-party initiatives and candidacies. [9]

Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy. It typically involves a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished. The term left-wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".

Right-wing politics holds that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable, typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics, or tradition. Hierarchy and inequality may be viewed as natural results of traditional social differences or the competition in market economies. The term right-wing can generally refer to "the conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system".

A market economy is an economic system in which the decisions regarding investment, production and distribution are guided by the price signals created by the forces of supply and demand. The major characteristic of a market economy is the existence of factor markets that play a dominant role in the allocation of capital and the factors of production.

One common criticism of radical centrism is that its policies are only marginally different from conventional centrist policies. [10] Another is that radical centrists' penchant for relying on newly-formed third parties is naïve and self-defeating. [10] Some observers see radical centrism as primarily a process of catalyzing dialogue and fresh thinking among polarized people and groups. [11]

Influences and precursors

Some influences on radical centrist political philosophy are not directly political. Robert C. Solomon, a philosopher with radical-centrist interests, [12] identifies a number of philosophical concepts supporting balance, reconciliation or synthesis, including Confucius's concept of ren , Aristotle's concept of the mean, Erasmus's and Montaigne's humanism, Vico's evolutionary vision of history, William James's and John Dewey's pragmatism, [nb 1] and Aurobindo Ghose's integration of opposites. [14] [nb 2]

Robert C. Solomon

Robert C. Solomon was an American professor of philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin, where he taught for more than 30 years. Professor Solomon won many teaching honors, including the Standard Oil Outstanding Teaching Award in 1973; the University of Texas President's Associates Teaching Award (twice); a Fulbright Lecture Award; University Research and National Endowment for the Humanities Grants; and the Chad Oliver Plan II Teaching Award in 1998.

Confucius Chinese teacher, editor, politician and philosopher

Confucius was a Chinese philosopher and politician of the Spring and Autumn period.

Ren (Confucianism) Confucian virtue

Ren is the Confucian virtue denoting the good quality of a virtuous human when being altruistic. Ren is exemplified by a normal adult's protective feelings for children. It is considered the outward expression of Confucian ideals.

Urban theorist and activist Jane Jacobs (1916-2006) in 1961. She has been described as "proto-radical middle". Jane Jacobs.jpg
Urban theorist and activist Jane Jacobs (1916–2006) in 1961. She has been described as "proto-radical middle".

However, most commonly cited influences and precursors are from the political realm. For example, British radical-centrist politician Nick Clegg considers himself an heir to political theorist John Stuart Mill, former Liberal Prime Minister David Lloyd George, economist John Maynard Keynes, social reformer William Beveridge and former Liberal Party leader Jo Grimond. [17] In his book Independent Nation (2004), John Avlon discusses precursors of 21st-century U.S. political centrism, including President Theodore Roosevelt, Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Senator Margaret Chase Smith, and Senator Edward W. Brooke. [18] Radical centrist writer Mark Satin points to political influences from outside the electoral arena, including communitarian thinker Amitai Etzioni, magazine publisher Charles Peters, management theorist Peter Drucker, city planning theorist Jane Jacobs and futurists Heidi and Alvin Toffler. [19] [nb 3] Satin calls Benjamin Franklin the radical middle's favorite Founding Father since he was "extraordinarily practical", "extraordinarily creative" and managed to "get the warring factions and wounded egos [at the U.S. Constitutional Convention] to transcend their differences". [22]

Nick Clegg Former Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

Sir Nicholas William Peter Clegg is a British former politician who served as Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 2010 to 2015 and as Leader of the Liberal Democrats from 2007 to 2015. An "Orange Book" liberal, Clegg served as a Member of Parliament (MP) for Sheffield Hallam from 2005 to 2017 and has been associated with both socially liberal and economically liberal policies. He is Vice-President for Global Affairs and Communications at Facebook.

John Stuart Mill British philosopher and political economist

John Stuart Mill, usually cited as J. S. Mill, was a British philosopher, political economist, and civil servant. One of the most influential thinkers in the history of classical liberalism, he contributed widely to social theory, political theory, and political economy. Dubbed "the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century", Mill's conception of liberty justified the freedom of the individual in opposition to unlimited state and social control.

David Lloyd George Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

David Lloyd George, 1st Earl Lloyd-George of Dwyfor, was a British statesman and Liberal politician. He was the last Liberal to serve as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.

Late-20th-century groundwork

Initial definitions

According to journalist William Safire, the phrase "radical middle" was coined by Renata Adler, [23] a staff writer for The New Yorker . In the introduction to her second collection of essays, Toward a Radical Middle (1969), she presented it as a healing radicalism. [24] Adler said it rejected the violent posturing and rhetoric of the 1960s in favor of such "corny" values as "reason, decency, prosperity, human dignity [and human] contact". [25] She called for the "reconciliation" of the white working class and African-Americans. [25]

In the 1970s, sociologist Donald I. Warren described the radical center as consisting of those "middle American radicals" who were suspicious of big government, the national media and academics, as well as rich people and predatory corporations. Although they might vote for Democrats or Republicans, or for populists like George Wallace, they felt politically homeless and were looking for leaders who would address their concerns. [26] [nb 4]

Joe Klein wrote the Newsweek cover story "Stalking the Radical Middle" (1995). Joe Klein 2016.jpg
Joe Klein wrote the Newsweek cover story "Stalking the Radical Middle" (1995).

In the 1980s and 1990s, several authors contributed their understandings to the concept of the radical center. For example, futurist Marilyn Ferguson added a holistic dimension to the concept when she said: "[The] Radical Center ... is not neutral, not middle-of-the-road, but a view of the whole road". [28] [nb 5] Sociologist Alan Wolfe located the creative part of the political spectrum at the center: "The extremes of right and left know where they stand, while the center furnishes what is original and unexpected". [30] African-American theorist Stanley Crouch upset many political thinkers when he pronounced himself a "radical pragmatist". [31] Crouch explained: "I affirm whatever I think has the best chance of working, of being both inspirational and unsentimental, of reasoning across the categories of false division and beyond the decoy of race". [32]

In his influential [33] 1995 Newsweek cover story "Stalking the Radical Middle", journalist Joe Klein described radical centrists as angrier and more frustrated than conventional Democrats and Republicans. Klein said they share four broad goals: getting money out of politics, balancing the budget, restoring civility and figuring out how to run government better. He also said their concerns were fueling "what is becoming a significant intellectual movement, nothing less than an attempt to replace the traditional notions of liberalism and conservatism". [34] [nb 6] [nb 7]

Relations to "Third Way"

In 1998, British sociologist Anthony Giddens claimed that the radical center is synonymous with the Third Way. [39] For Giddens, an advisor to former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and for many other European political actors, the Third Way is a reconstituted form of social democracy. [40] [41]

Some radical centrist thinkers do not equate radical centrism with the Third Way. In Britain, many do not see themselves as social democrats. Most prominently, British radical-centrist politician Nick Clegg has made it clear he does not consider himself an heir to Tony Blair [17] and Richard Reeves, Clegg's longtime advisor, emphatically rejects social democracy. [42]

In the United States, the situation is different because the term Third Way was adopted by the Democratic Leadership Council and other moderate Democrats. [43] However, most U.S. radical centrists also avoid the term. Ted Halstead and Michael Lind's introduction to radical centrist politics fails to mention it [44] and Lind subsequently accused the organized moderate Democrats of siding with the "center-right" and Wall Street. [27] Radical centrists have expressed dismay with what they see as "split[ting] the difference", [34] "triangulation" [27] [45] and other supposed practices of what some of them call the "mushy middle". [46] [47] [nb 8]

Twenty-first-century overviews

Michael Lind was co-author of The Radical Center: The Future of American Politics (2001). Author Michael Lind.jpg
Michael Lind was co-author of The Radical Center: The Future of American Politics (2001).

The first years of the 21st century saw publication of four introductions to radical centrist politics: Ted Halstead and Michael Lind's The Radical Center (2001), Matthew Miller's The Two Percent Solution (2003), John Avlon's Independent Nation (2004) and Mark Satin's Radical Middle (2004). [48] [49] These books attempted to take the concept of radical centrism beyond the stage of "cautious gestures" [50] and journalistic observation and define it as a political philosophy. [1] [2]

The authors came to their task from diverse political backgrounds: Avlon had been a speechwriter for New York Republican Mayor Rudolph Giuliani; [51] Miller had been a business consultant before serving in President Bill Clinton's budget office; [52] Lind had been an exponent of Harry Truman-style "national liberalism"; [53] Halstead had run a think tank called Redefining Progress; [54] and Satin had co-drafted the U.S. Green Party's foundational political statement, "Ten Key Values". [55] However, there is a generational bond: all these authors were between 31 and 41 years of age when their books were published (except for Satin, who was nearing 60).

While the four books do not speak with one voice, among them they express assumptions, analyses, policies and strategies that helped set the parameters for radical centrism as a 21st-century political philosophy:


Mark Satin in 2011.jpg
John avlon pic.jpg
Early-21st-century radical centrist authors included former Green activist Mark Satin (left) and former Republican activist John Avlon (right).


Policies (in general)

Matthew Miller wrote The Two Percent Solution: Fixing America's Problems in Ways Liberals and Conservatives Can Love (2003). Matt Miller for Congress.jpg
Matthew Miller wrote The Two Percent Solution: Fixing America's Problems in Ways Liberals and Conservatives Can Love (2003).


Idea creation and dissemination

Along with publication of the four overviews of radical centrist politics, the first part of the 21st century saw a rise in the creation and dissemination of radical centrist policy ideas. [1] [2]

Think tanks and mass media

Panel discussion at the New America think tank, Washington, D.C., 2015. 2015-Feb-25 Future of War Lind Morris Freedman Bobbitt.jpg
Panel discussion at the New America think tank, Washington, D.C., 2015.

Several think tanks are developing radical centrist ideas more thoroughly than was done in the overview books. By the early 2000s these included Demos in Britain; the Cape York Institute for Policy and Leadership in Australia; and New America (formerly the New America Foundation) in the United States. New America was started by authors Ted Halstead and Michael Lind, as well as two others, to bring radical centrist ideas to Washington, D.C. journalists and policy researchers. [54] [nb 10]

In the 2010s, new think tanks began promoting radical centrist ideas. "Radix: Think Tank for the Radical Centre" was established in London in 2016; its initial board of trustees included former Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg. [99] Writing in The Guardian , Radix policy director David Boyle called for "big, radical ideas" that could break with both trickle-down conservatism and backward-looking socialism. [100] In 2018, a policy document released by the then four-year-old Niskanen Center of Washington, D.C. was characterized as a "manifesto for radical centrism" by Big Think writer Paul Ratner. [101] According to Ratner, the document – signed by some of Niskanen's executives and policy analysts – is an attempt to "incorporate rival ideological positions into a way forward" for America. [101]

A radical centrist perspective can also be found in major periodicals. In the United States, for example, The Washington Monthly was started by early radical centrist thinker Charles Peters [102] [103] [nb 11] and many large-circulation magazines publish articles by New America fellows. [105] Columnists who have written from a radical centrist perspective include John Avlon, [106] Thomas Friedman, [107] Joe Klein, [108] and Matthew Miller. [109] Prominent journalists James Fallows and Fareed Zakaria have been identified as radical centrists. [1]

In Britain, the news magazine The Economist positions itself as radical centrist. An editorial ("leader") in 2012 declared in bolded type: "A new form of radical centrist politics is needed to tackle inequality without hurting economic growth". [110] An essay on The Economist 's website the following year, introduced by the editor, argues that the magazine had always "com[e] ... from what we like to call the radical centre". [111]

Books on specific topics

Parag Khanna speaks on his book How to Run the World: Charting a Course to the Next Renaissance (2011). Parag Khanna (6856923986).jpg
Parag Khanna speaks on his book How to Run the World: Charting a Course to the Next Renaissance (2011).

Many books are offering radical centrist perspectives and policy proposals on specific topics. Some examples:

Radical centrist political action

Marina Silva 2014 candidate.jpg
Noel Pearson 8Feb10.jpg
By the 2010s, radical centrist political actors were said to include Australia's Noel Pearson [123] (right) and Brazil's Marina Silva [124] (left).

Radical centrists have been and continue to be engaged in a variety of political activities:


In Australia, Aboriginal lawyer Noel Pearson is building an explicitly radical centrist movement among Aborigines. [125] The movement is seeking more assistance from the Australian state, but is also seeking to convince individual Aborigines to take more responsibility for their lives. [126] [127] To political philosopher Katherine Curchin, writing in the Australian Journal of Political Science , Pearson is attempting something unusual and worthwhile: casting public debate on indigenous issues in terms of a search for a radical center. [123] She says Pearson's methods have much in common with those of deliberative democracy. [123]


In the late 2010s, Brazil's Marina Silva was identified by The Economist as an emerging radical-centrist leader. Formerly a member of the left-wing Workers' Party, by 2017 she had organized a new party whose watchwords included environmentalism, liberalism, and "clean politics". [124] She had already served six years as Minister of the Environment, and in 2010 she was the Green Party candidate for President of Brazil, finishing third with 20% of the vote. [128]


Nick Clegg with his wife and infant son, 2009 Clegg and Gonzalez Durantez.jpg
Nick Clegg with his wife and infant son, 2009

Following the 2010 election, Nick Clegg, then leader of the Liberal Democrats (Britain's third-largest party at the time), had his party enter into a Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition agreement to form a majority government. [129] In a speech to party members in the spring of 2011, Clegg declared that he considers himself and his party to be radical centrist:

For the left, an obsession with the state. For the right, a worship of the market. But as liberals, we place our faith in people. People with power and opportunity in their hands. Our opponents try to divide us with their outdated labels of left and right. But we are not on the left and we are not on the right. We have our own label: Liberal. We are liberals and we own the freehold to the centre ground of British politics. Our politics is the politics of the radical centre. [130]

In the autumn of 2012, Clegg's longtime policy advisor elaborated on the differences between Clegg's identity as a "radical liberal" and traditional social democracy. [42]


Justin Trudeau campaigning at LGBTQ Pride, Vancouver, 2015 Justin Trudeau at the Vancouver LGBTQ Pride 2015.jpg
Justin Trudeau campaigning at LGBTQ Pride, Vancouver, 2015

In the late 1970s, Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau claimed that his Liberal Party adhered to the "radical center". [131] [132] One thing this means, Trudeau said, is that "sometimes we have to fight against the state". [131] Paul Hellyerr, who served in Trudeau's first cabinet and spent over half a century in Canadian political life, [133] [nb 13] said in 2010, "I have been branded as everything from far left to far right. I put myself in the radical center – one who seeks solutions to problems based on first principles without regard to ideology. I believe that it is the kind of solution the world desperately needs at a time when niggling change or fine tuning is not good enough". [134]

Justin Trudeau, elected Prime Minister of Canada in 2015, has been characterized as radical centrist by Stuart Trew of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives [135] as well as by the magazine CounterPunch [136] Trew notes that both Justin Trudeau and his French counterpart, Emmanuel Macron, are optimists, moderate redistributionists, internationalists, feminists, and good listeners. "Consultation, for radical centrists, is key", Trew concludes. [135]


In 2017, The Economist described Chile's Andrés Velasco as a rising radical-centrist politician. [124] A former finance minister in Michelle Bachelet's first government, he later unsuccessfully ran against her for the presidential nomination and then helped establish a new political party. [124] According to The Economist, Velasco and his colleagues say they support a political philosophy that is both liberal and egalitarian. [124] Like Amartya Sen, they see freedom not just as freedom-from, but as the absence of domination and the opportunity to fulfill one's potential. [124] Like John Rawls, they reject the far left's emphasis on state redistribution in favor of an emphasis on equal treatment for all with special vigilance against class- and race-based discrimination. [124]


Emmanuel Macron speaking at a high-tech conference, 2014 Emmanuel Macron (11 decembre 2014) (3).jpg
Emmanuel Macron speaking at a high-tech conference, 2014

Several observers have identified Emmanuel Macron, elected President of France in 2017, as a radical centrist. [135] [136] Anne Applebaum of The Washington Post says Macron "represents the brand-new radical center", as does his political movement, En Marche!, which Applebaum translates as "forward". [137] She notes a number of politically bridging ideas Macron holds – for example, "He embraces markets, but says he believes in 'collective solidarity'". [137] A professor of history, Robert Zaretsky, writing in Foreign Policy , argues that Macron's radical centrism is "the embodiment of a particularly French kind of center – the extreme center". [138] He points to Macron's declaration that he is "neither left nor right", and to his support for policies, such as public-sector austerity and major environmental investments, that traditional political parties might find contradictory. [138]

U.S. politician Dave Andersion, writing in The Hill newspaper, says that Macron's election victory points the way for those "who wish to transcend their polarized politics of [the present] in the name of a new center, not a moderate center associated with United States and United Kingdom 'Third Way' politics but what has been described as Macron's 'radical center' point of view. … [It] transcends left and right but takes important elements of both sides". [139]


In 2018, Annalena Baerbock became co-leader of the increasingly pragmatic German Green party. Annalena Baerbock (Pressefoto).jpg
In 2018, Annalena Baerbock became co-leader of the increasingly pragmatic German Green party.

Writing at The Dahrendorf Forum, a joint project of the Hertie School of Governance (Berlin) and the London School of Economics, Forum fellow Alexandru Filip put the German Green party of 2018 in the same camp as Emmanuel Macron's French party (see above) and Albert Rivera's Spanish one (see below). His article "On New and Radical Centrism" argued that the Greens did relatively well in the 2017 German federal election not only because of their stance against the "system" but also as a result of "a more centrist, socio-liberal, pro-European constituency that felt alienated by the power-sharing cartel" of the larger parties. [140]

Following the 2017 federal election, Deutsche Welle correspondent Rina Goldenberg traced the evolution of the German Greens from the idealism of the 1980s to a more pragmatic but still principled stance. [141] She wrote, in pertinent part:

The internal make-up of the Greens has evolved as the first generation has grown older. Many have changed their priorities, morphing from former hippies to urban professionals. Green supporters are generally well-educated, high-earning urbanites with a strong belief in the benefits of a multicultural society. No other party fields more candidates with an immigrant background than the Greens. [142]

Traditionally, the German Greens elect co-leaders of their party – one male and one female; one from the party's leftist wing and one from its pragmatic, centrist wing. [141] [143] In 2018 the party broke with tradition by electing both co-leaders from its moderate wing, federal MP Annalena Baerbock and northern-state politician Robert Habeck. [143]


Yair Lapid addressing supporters on election night, 2013 Yesh Atid Election Night Party.jpg
Yair Lapid addressing supporters on election night, 2013

In an article for Israel Hayom in 2012, conservative Knesset member Tzipi Hotovely named Israeli politician Yair Lapid and his Yesh Atid (There Is a Future) party as examples of "the radical center" in Israel, which she warned her readers against. [144] In 2013, Yossi Klein Halevi – author of books addressing Israelis and Palestinians alike [145] [146] – explained why he voted for Lapid, saying, in part:

He emerged as the voice of middle class disaffection, yet included in his [party] list two Ethiopians, representatives of one of the country's poorest constituencies. ... Yair has sought dialogue. ... Some see Yair's Israeli eclecticism as an expression of ideological immaturity, of indecisiveness. In fact it reflects his ability – alone among today's leaders – to define the Israeli center. ... These voters agree with the left about the dangers of occupation and with the right about the dangers of a delusional peace. [147]

In 2017, Lapid and his party were surging in the polls. [148]


According to journalist Angelo Persichilli, Italian Christian Democratic Party leader Aldo Moro's call for "parallel convergence" prefigured today's calls for radical centrism. [149] Until being killed by the Red Brigades in the late 1970s, Moro had been promoting a political alliance between Christian Democracy and the Italian Communist Party. [149] Moro acknowledged that the two parties were so different that they ran on parallel tracks and he did not want them to lose their identities, but he emphasized that in the end their interests were convergent—hence the phrase he coined and popularized, "parallel convergence". [149]

In the 2010s, Spanish radical centrist Albert Rivera reportedly cited Italian politician Matteo Renzi as a soulmate. [150]


According to the Dutch opinion magazine HP/De Tijd , the Dutch political party D66 can be seen as radical centrist. [151] Radical centrism is a possibility in another Dutch party as well. In a report presented in 2012 to the Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA) party, CDA member and former minister of social affairs Aart Jan de Geus recommends that the CDA develop itself into a radical centrist ("radicale midden") party. [152] The D66 has been seen as the more progressive and individualistic of the two parties, and the CDA as the more conservative and personalistic / communitarian. [151]


Albert Rivera speaking at a Ciudadanos event, 2015 Albert Rivera - 02.jpg
Albert Rivera speaking at a Ciudadanos event, 2015

In Spain, Albert Rivera and his Ciudadanos (Citizens) party have been described as radical centrist by Politico , [153] as well as by Spanish-language commentators and news outlets. [154] Rivera himself has described his movement as radical centrist, saying, "We're the radical center. We can't beat them when it comes to populism. What Ciudadanos aspires to is radical, courageous changes backed by numbers, data, proposals, economists, technicians and capable people". [153] Rivera has called for politics to transcend the old labels, saying, "We have to move away from the old left-right axis". [150] The Economist has likened Rivera and his party to Emmanuel Macron and his party En Marche! in France. [150] Rivera's party has taken on the established parties of the left and right and has had some success, most notably in the 2017 Catalan regional election. [155]

United States

Some commentators identify Ross Perot's 1992 U.S. presidential campaign as the first radical middle national campaign. [34] [156] However, many radical centrist authors were not enthusiastic about Perot. Matthew Miller acknowledges that Perot had enough principle to support a gasoline tax hike, [157] Halstead and Lind note that he popularized the idea of balancing the budget [158] and John Avlon says he crystallized popular distrust of partisan extremes. [159] However, none of those authors examines Perot's ideas or campaigns in depth and Mark Satin does not mention Perot at all. Joe Klein mocked one of Perot's campaign gaffes and said he was not a sufficiently substantial figure. [34] Miller characterizes Perot as a rich, self-financed lone wolf. [160] By contrast, what most radical centrists say they want in political action terms is the building of a grounded political movement. [161] [162]

Political independent Jesse Ventura was elected Governor of Minnesota in 1998. Esse Ventura 2000.jpg
Political independent Jesse Ventura was elected Governor of Minnesota in 1998.

Also in the 1990s, political independents Jesse Ventura, Angus King and Lowell Weicker became governors of American states. According to John Avlon, they pioneered the combination of fiscal prudence and social tolerance that has served as a model for radical centrist governance ever since. [58] They also developed a characteristic style, a combination of "common sense and maverick appeal". [163] [nb 14]

In the decade of the 2000s, a number of governors and mayors – most prominently, California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg – were celebrated by Time magazine as "action heroes" who looked beyond partisanship to get things done. [165] A similar article that decade in Politico placed "self-styled 'radical centrist'" governor Mark Warner of Virginia in that camp. [166]

In the 2010s, the radical centrist movement in the U.S. is mostly being played out in the national media. In 2010, for example, The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman called for "a Tea Party of the radical center", an organized national pressure group. [167] Friedman later co-wrote a book with scholar Michael Mandelbaum discussing key issues in American society and calling for an explicitly radical centrist politics and program to deal with them. [168] At The Washington Post, columnist Matthew Miller was explaining "Why we need a third party of (radical) centrists". [169] [nb 15]

In 2011, Friedman championed Americans Elect, an insurgent group of radical centrist Democrats, Republicans and independents who were hoping to run an independent Presidential candidate in 2012. [107] Meanwhile, Miller offered "[t]he third-party stump speech we need". [173] In his book The Price of Civilization (2011), Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs called for the creation of a third U.S. party, an "Alliance for the Radical Center". [174]

Insignia of the No Labels organization Problem Solver Seal.png
Insignia of the No Labels organization

While no independent radical-centrist presidential candidate emerged in 2012, John Avlon emphasized the fact that independent voters remain the fastest-growing portion of the electorate. [106]

In late 2015, the No Labels organization, co-founded by Avlon, [175] called a national "Problem Solver" convention to discuss how to best reduce political polarization and promote political solutions that could bridge the left-right divide. [176] A lengthy article in The Atlantic about the convention conveys the views of leaders of a new generation of beyond-left-and-right (or both-left-and-right) organizations, including Joan Blades of Living Room Conversations, David Blankenhorn of Better Angels, Carolyn Lukensmeyer of the National Institute for Civil Discourse and Steve McIntosh of the Institute for Cultural Evolution. [176] Following the 2016 presidential election, prominent U.S. commentator David Brooks praised No Labels and other such groups and offered them advice, including this: "[D]eepen a positive national vision that is not merely a positioning between left and right". [177]

By the mid-2010s, several exponents of radical centrism had run, albeit unsuccessfully, for seats in the United States Congress, including Matthew Miller in California [178] and Dave Anderson in Maryland. [139]

According to a January 2018 article in The Washington Post , West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin greeted newly elected Alabama Senator Doug Jones with the phrase, "Welcome to the radical middle". [179] Both senators have been regarded as moderate and bipartisan. [180] In March 2018, the political newspaper The Hill ran an article by attorney Michael D. Fricklas entitled "The Time for Radical Centrism Has Come". [181] It asserted that the ominibus spending bill for 2018 jettisoned spending proposals favored by both political "extremes" in order to obtain votes of "principled moderates", and that its passage therefore represented a victory for what Maine Senator Susan Collins calls "radical centrism". [181]


Even before the 21st century, some observers were criticizing what they saw as radical centrism. In the 1960s, liberal political cartoonist Jules Feiffer employed the term "radical middle" to mock what he saw as the timid and pretentious outlook of the American political class. [182] [183] [nb 16] During the Ross Perot presidential campaign of 1992, conservative journalist William Safire suggested that a more appropriate term for the radical center might be the "snarling center". [23] In 1998, in an article entitled "The Radical Centre: A Politics Without Adversary", Belgian political theorist Chantal Mouffe argued that passionate and often bitter conflict between left and right is a necessary feature of any democracy. [184] [nb 17]

Objections to policies, assumptions, and attitudes

Critics of radical centrism include liberal journalist Robert Kuttner. Robert Kuttner - Flickr image 3444876149.jpg
Critics of radical centrism include liberal journalist Robert Kuttner.

Some 21st-century commentators argue that radical centrist policies are not substantially different from conventional centrist ideas. [10] [187] For example, liberal journalist Robert Kuttner says there already is a radical centrist party –"It's called the Democrats". [186] He faults Matthew Miller's version of radical centrism for offering "feeble" policy solutions and indulging in wishful thinking about the motives of the political right. [188] Progressive social theorist Richard Kahlenberg says that Ted Halstead and Michael Lind's book The Radical Center is too skeptical about the virtues of labor unions and too ardent about the virtues of the market. [189]

Others contend that radical centrist policies lack clarity. For example, in 2001 journalist Eric Alterman said that the New America Foundation think tank was neither liberal nor progressive and did not know what it was. [54]

In 2017, in a 1,700-word article for CounterPunch entitled "Beware the Radical Center", Canadian writer Ryan Shah characterized radical centrism as a just-in-time "repackaging" of neoliberalism meant to sustain the political, economic, and social status quo. [136] He warned that political leaders such as Europe's Emmanuel Macron and North America's Justin Trudeau were creating a false image of radical centrist programs as progressive, and urged leftists to develop "genuine" policy alternatives to neoliberalism such as those advocated by British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn. [136] Similarly, Politico reports that some think Spain's radical centrist Ciudadanos (Citizens) party is "encouraged by the Spanish establishment" in order to undercut the radical left and preserve the status quo. [153]

Thomas Friedman's columns supporting radical centrism are a favorite target for bloggers. Thomas Friedman 2005 (5).jpg
Thomas Friedman's columns supporting radical centrism are a favorite target for bloggers.

By contrast, some observers claim that radical centrist ideas are too different from mainstream policies to be viable. Sam Tanenhaus, the editor of The New York Times Book Review , called the proposals in Halstead and Lind's book "utopian". [2] According to Ed Kilgore, the policy director of the Democratic Leadership Council, Mark Satin's Radical Middle book "ultimately places him in the sturdy tradition of 'idealistic' American reformers who think smart and principled people unencumbered by political constraints can change everything". [187]

Some have suggested that radical centrists may be making false assumptions about their effectiveness or appeal. In the United States, for example, political analyst James Joyner found that states adopting non-partisan redistricting commissions, a favorite radical-centrist proposal, have been no more fiscally responsible than states without such commissions. [190] In 2017, The Economist wondered whether Latin Americans really wanted to hear the "hard truths" about their societies that some radical centrists were offering them. [124]

Radical centrist attitudes have also been criticized. For example, many bloggers have characterized Thomas Friedman's columns on radical centrism as elitist and glib. [10] In Australia, some think that Australian attorney Noel Pearson – long an advocate of radical centrism – is in fact a "polarizing partisan". [191] In 2012, conservative Knesset member Tzipi Hotovely criticized Israel's radical center for lacking such attributes as courage, decisiveness, and realistic thinking. [144]

Objections to strategies

Conservative journalist Ramesh Ponnuru has criticized radical centrist strategy. Ramesh Ponnuru at U.S. embassy in Vienna.jpg
Conservative journalist Ramesh Ponnuru has criticized radical centrist strategy.

Some observers question the wisdom of seeking consensus, post-partisanship or reconciliation in political life. [10] Political scientist Jonathan Bernstein argues that American democratic theory from the time of James Madison's Federalist No. 10 (1787) has been based on the acknowledgement of faction and the airing of debate, and he sees no reason to change now. [10]

Other observers feel radical centrists are misreading the political situation. For example, conservative journalist Ramesh Ponnuru says liberals and conservatives are not ideologically opposed to such radical centrist measures as limiting entitlements and raising taxes to cover national expenditures. Instead, voters are opposed to them and things will change when voters can be convinced otherwise. [192]

The third-party strategy favored by many U.S. radical centrists has been criticized as impractical and diversionary. According to these critics, what is needed instead is (a) reform of the legislative process; and (b) candidates in existing political parties who will support radical centrist ideas. [10] The specific third-party vehicle favored by many U.S. radical centrists in 2012 – Americans Elect [193] – was criticized as an "elite-driven party" [10] supported by a "dubious group of Wall Street multi-millionaires". [186]

After spending time with a variety of radical centrists, Alec MacGillis of The New Republic concluded that their perspectives are so disparate that they could never come together to build a viable political organization. [194]

Internal concerns

Some radical centrists are less than sanguine about their future. One concern is co-optation. For example, Michael Lind worries that the enthusiasm for the term radical center, on the part of "arbiters of the conventional wisdom", may signal a weakening of the radical vision implied by the term. [27]

Another concern is passion. John Avlon fears that some centrists cannot resist the lure of passionate partisans, whom he calls "wingnuts". [195] By contrast, Mark Satin worries that radical centrism, while "thoroughly sensible", lacks an "animating passion" – and claims there has never been a successful political movement without one. [196]

Radical centrism as dialogue and process

AmericaSpeaks event, 2011 America Speaks event - Flickr - Knight Foundation.jpg
AmericaSpeaks event, 2011

Some radical centrists, such as theorist Tom Atlee, [63] mediator Mark Gerzon, [197] and activist Joseph F. McCormick, [63] see radical centrism as primarily a commitment to process. [63] [198] Their approach is to facilitate processes of structured dialogue among polarized people and groups, from the neighborhood level on up. [63] [199] A major goal is to enable dialogue participants to come up with new perspectives and solutions that can address every party's core interests. [63] [200] Onward Christian Athletes author Tom Krattenmaker speaks of the radical center as that (metaphoric) space where such dialogue and innovation can occur. [11] Similarly, The Lipstick Proviso: Women, Sex, and Power in the Real World author Karen Lehrman Bloch speaks of the radical middle as a "common ground" where left and right can "nurture a saner society". [201]

Organizations seeking to catalyze dialogue and innovation among diverse people and groups have included AmericaSpeaks, [202] C1 World Dialogue, [203] Everyday Democracy, [204] Listening Project (North Carolina), [205] Living Room Conversations, [176] [206] Public Conversations Project, [63] [207] Search for Common Ground, [208] and Village Square. [176] Organizations specifically for university students include BridgeUSA [209] [210] and Sustained Dialogue. [209] The city of Portland, Oregon has been characterized as "radical middle" in USA Today newspaper because many formerly antagonistic groups there are said to be talking to, learning from and working with one another. [11]

In 2005, The Atlantic portrayed Egyptian Islamic cleric Ali Gomaa as the voice of an emergent form of radical Islam – "traditionalism without the extremism". [211] In 2012, in an article entitled "The Radical Middle: Building Bridges Between the Muslim and Western Worlds, [203] Gomaa shared his approach to the dialogic process:

The purpose of dialogue should not be to convert others, but rather to share with them one's principles. Sincere dialogue should strengthen one's faith while breaking down barriers. ... Dialogue is a process of exploration and coming to know the other, as much as it is an example of clarifying one's own positions. Therefore, when one dialogues with others, what is desired is to explore their ways of thinking, so as to correct misconceptions in our own minds and arrive at common ground. [212]

In 2017, former American football player and Green Beret soldier Nate Boyer suggested that his "radical middle" stance could help address the issues and resolve the controversy surrounding U.S. national anthem protests at football games. [213] [214]


  1. For an extended discussion of neoclassical American pragmatism and its possible political implications, see Louis Menand's book The Metaphysical Club . [13]
  2. An international evangelical movement, the Association of Vineyard Churches, describes itself as "radical middle" because it believes that spiritual truth is found by holding supposedly contradictory concepts in tension. Examples include head vs. heart, planning vs. being Spirit-led, and standing for truth vs. standing for Unity. [15]
  3. In the 1980s, Satin's own Washington, D.C.-based political newsletter, New Options, described itself as "post-liberal". [20] Culture critic Annie Gottlieb says it urged the New Left and New Age to "evolve into a 'New Center'". [21]
  4. Warren's book influenccd Michael Lind and other 21st century radical centrists. [2] [27]
  5. Two years later, another prominent futurist, John Naisbitt, wrote in bolded type, "The political left and right are dead; all the action is being generated by a radical center". [29]
  6. Subsequent to Klein's article, some political writers posited the existence of two radical centers, one neopopulist and bitter and the other moderate and comfortable. [35] [36] According to historian Sam Tanenhaus, one of the strengths of Ted Halstead and Michael Lind's book The Radical Center (2001) is it attempts to weld the two supposed radical-centrist factions together. [2]
  7. A 1991 story in Time magazine with a similar title, "Looking for The Radical Middle", revealed the existence of a "New Paradigm Society" in Washington, D.C., a group of high-level liberal and conservative activists seeking ways to bridge the ideological divide. [37] The article discusses what it describes as the group's virtual manifesto, E. J. Dionne's book Why Americans Hate Politics. [38]
  8. In 2010, radical centrist Michael Lind stated that "to date, President Obama has been the soft-spoken tribune of the mushy middle". [27]
  9. Matthew Miller added an "Afterword" to the paperback edition of his book favoring formation of a "transformational third party" by the year 2010, if the two major parties remained stuck in their ways. [96]
  10. Besides Halstead and Lind, thinkers affiliated with the New America Foundation in the early 2000s included Katherine Boo, Steven Clemons, James Fallows, Maya MacGuineas, Walter Russell Mead, James Pinkerton, Jedediah Purdy, and Sherle Schwenninger. [54] [98]
  11. Peters used the term "neoliberal" to distinguish his ideas from those of neoconservatives and conventional liberals. His version of neoliberalism is separate from what came to be known internationally as neoliberalism. [103] [104]
  12. Howard summarized Try Common Sense in an article entitled "A Radical Centrist Platform for 2020." [118]
  13. In 1997, forty-eight years after first being elected to the Canadian Parliament, Hellyer founded a minor political party, the Canadian Action Party. [133]
  14. By the end of the 20th century, some mainstream politicians were cloaking themselves in the language of the radical center. For example, in 1996 former U.S. Defense Secretary Elliot Richardson stated: "I am a moderate – a radical moderate. I believe profoundly in the ultimate value of human dignity and equality". [164] At a conference in Berlin, Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien declared, "I am the radical center". [40]
  15. In 2009, on The Huffington Post website, the president of The Future 500 [170] – following up on his earlier endorsement of the "radical middle" [171] – made the case for a "transpartisan" alliance between left and right. [172]
  16. According to journalist John Judis, sociologist Seymour Martin Lipset used the term "radical centrism" in his book Political Man (1960) to help explain European fascism. [35]
  17. Mouffe also criticized radical centrism for its "New Age rhetorical flourish". [185]

Related Research Articles

Third Way centrist political and economic ideology

The Third Way is a position akin to centrism that tries to reconcile right-wing and left-wing politics by advocating a varying synthesis of some centre-right and centrist economic and some centre-left social policies. The Third Way was created as a re-evaluation of political policies within various centre-left progressive movements in response to doubt regarding the economic viability of the state and the overuse of economic interventionist policies that had previously been popularised by Keynesianism, but which at that time contrasted with the rise of popularity for neoliberalism and the New Right. The Third Way is promoted by social liberals and some social democratic parties.

The left–right political spectrum is a system of classifying political positions, ideologies and parties, from equality on the left to social hierarchy on the right. Left-wing politics and right-wing politics are often presented as opposed, although a particular individual or group may take a left-wing stance on one matter and a right-wing stance on another; and some stances may overlap and be considered either left- or right-wing depending on the ideology. In France, where the terms originated, the Left has been called "the party of movement" and the Right "the party of order". The intermediate stance is called centrism and a person with such a position is a moderate or centrist.

Mark Satin American political theorist, author, and newsletter publisher

Mark Ivor Satin is an American political theorist, author, and newsletter publisher. He is best known for contributing to the development and dissemination of three political perspectives – neopacifism in the 1960s, New Age politics in the 1970s and 1980s, and radical centrism in the 1990s and 2000s. Satin's work is sometimes seen as building toward a new political ideology, and then it is often labeled "transformational", "post-liberal", or "post-Marxist". One historian calls Satin's writing "post-hip".

A political moderate is a person in the center category of the left–right political spectrum.

Liberalism and radicalism in France refer to different movements and ideologies.

This article gives an overview of liberalism and centrism in Estonia. It is limited to liberal and centrist parties with substantial support, mainly proved by having had a representation in parliament. The sign ⇒ denotes another party in that scheme. For inclusion in this scheme it is not necessary that the party has labeled itself as a liberal party.

New Democrats centrist faction within the United States Democratic Party, including Bill Clinton and Barack Obama

New Democrats, also known as centrist Democrats, Clinton Democrats, or moderate Democrats, are a moderate ideological faction within the Democratic Party of the United States. As the "Third Way" faction of the party, they support both social liberalism and economic liberalism. New Democrats dominated the party from the late-1980s through the mid-2010s. They are represented by organizations such as the New Democrat Network and the New Democrat Coalition.

John Avlon American journalist

John Phillips Avlon is an American journalist and political commentator. He is a Senior Political Analyst and anchor at CNN and former editor-in-chief and managing director of The Daily Beast from 2013 to 2018. Avlon was previously a columnist and associate editor for The New York Sun and chief speechwriter for former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani.

In politics, a big tent or catch-all party is a type of political party that seeks to attract voters from different points of view and ideologies. This is in contrast to other parties that defend a determined ideology and seek voters who adhere to that ideology and convince people towards it.

Michael Lind American journalist

Michael Lind is an American writer.

Ted Halstead is an American author, policy entrepreneur, and public speaker who has founded three public policy think tanks: the Climate Leadership Council, New America, and Redefining Progress. His areas of expertise include climate policy, economic policy, environmental policy, healthcare, and political reform.

Triangulation (politics)

In politics, triangulation is the strategy in which a political candidate presents their ideology as being above or between the left and right sides of a traditional democratic political spectrum. It involves adopting for oneself some of the ideas of one's political opponent. The logic behind it is that it both takes credit for the opponent's ideas, and insulates the triangulator from attacks on that particular issue.

Transpartisanship represents an emerging paradigm of political thought which accepts the validity of truths across a range of political perspectives and seeks to synthesize them into an inclusive, pragmatic container beyond typical political dualities. It is distinct from bipartisanship, which aims to negotiate between “right” and “left,” resulting in a dualistic perspective, and nonpartisanship, which tends to avoid political affiliation altogether.

Matthew Miller (journalist) American journalist

Matthew Miller is an American journalist, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a monthly columnist for Fortune, regular contributor to The New York Times Magazine and The Atlantic Monthly, and author of The Two Percent Solution. He also appears regularly on CNN.

Democratic Movement (France) political party in France

The Democratic Movement is a centrist political party in France that is characterised by a strong pro-European stance. MoDem was founded by François Bayrou to succeed the Union for French Democracy (UDF) and contest the 2007 legislative election, after his strong showing in the 2007 presidential election. Initially named the Democratic Party, the party was renamed "Democratic Movement", because there was already a small Democratic Party in France. MoDem secured an agreement with En Marche! in the 2017 legislative election after Bayrou endorsed the candidacy of Emmanuel Macron in February. In June 2017, the MoDem and its MEPs were accused of potentially fictitious employment practices within the European Parliament. Bayrou resigned on 21 June from his post as Justice Minister soon after he became embroiled in the fictitious employment scandals, and allegations of harassment against a journalist reporting on the scandal.

Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe group Liberal-centrist political group in the European Parliament

The Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe was the liberal–centrist political group of the European Parliament from 2004 until 2019. It was made up of MEPs from two European political parties, the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party and the European Democratic Party, which collectively form the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe.

Union of Democrats and Independents

The Union of Democrats and Independents is a centrist, liberal political party in France founded on 18 September 2012 on the basis of the parliamentary group of the same name in the National Assembly. The party was composed of separate political parties who retained their independence. As most of them have been expelled or have left, the Democratic European Force is the last founding party to participate in the UDI.

London Liberal Democrats

The London Liberal Democrats is the regional party of the English Liberal Democrats that operates in Greater London.

New World Alliance organization

The New World Alliance was an American political organization that sought to articulate and implement what it called "transformational" political ideas. It was organized in the late 1970s and dissolved in 1983. It has been described as the first U.S. national political organization of its type and as the first entity to articulate a comprehensive transformational political program.


  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Olson, Robert (January–February 2005). "The Rise of 'Radical Middle' Politics". The Futurist, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 45–47. Publication of the World Future Society. Article focuses primarily on Mark Satin's book Radical Middle.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tanenhaus, Sam (14 April 2010). "The Radical Center: The History of an Ideal". The New York Times Book Review, p. 27. Article focuses primarily on Ted Halstead and Michael Lind's book The Radical Center. Retrieved 7 February 2013.
  3. Halstead, Ted; Lind, Michael (2001). The Radical Center: The Future of American Politics. Doubleday/Random House, p. 16. ISBN   978-0-385-50045-6.
  4. 1 2 3 Avlon, John (2004). Independent Nation: How the Vital Center Is Changing American Politics. Harmony Books/Random House, p. 2. ISBN   978-1-4000-5023-9.
  5. Satin, Mark (2004). Radical Middle: The Politics We Need Now. Westview Press and Basic Books, p. 5. ISBN   978-0-8133-4190-3.
  6. Avlon (2004), p. 109.
  7. 1 2 Miller, Matthew (2003). The Two Percent Solution: Fixing America's Problems in Ways Liberals and Conservatives Can Love. Public Affairs/Perseus Books Group. p. 71. ISBN   978-1-58648-158-2.
  8. 1 2 Halstead, Ted, ed.(2004). The Real State of the Union: From the Best Minds in America, Bold Solutions to the Problems Politicians Dare Not Address. Basic Books, Chaps. 27–31. ISBN   978-0-465-05052-9.
  9. 1 2 Avlon (2004), Part 4.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Marx, Greg (25 July 2011). "Tom Friedman's 'Radical' Wrongness". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
  11. 1 2 3 Krattenmaker, Tom (27 December 2012). "Welcome to the 'Radical Middle'". USA Today newspaper, p. A12. Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  12. Solomon, Robert C. (2003). A Better Way to Think About Business: How Personal Integrity Leads to Corporate Success. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-538315-7.
  13. Menand, Louis (2001). The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, Part Five. ISBN   978-0-374-19963-0.
  14. Solomon Robert C. Higgins, Kathleen M. (1996). A Short History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, pp. 93, 66, 161, 179, 222, 240, and 298. ISBN   978-0-19-510-196-6.
  15. Jackson, Bill (1999). The Quest for the Radical Middle: A History of the Vineyard. Vineyard International Publishing, pp. 18–21. ISBN   978-0-620-24319-3.
  16. Satin (2004), p. 30.
  17. 1 2 Stratton, Allegra; Wintour, Patrick (13 March 2011). "Nick Clegg Tells Lib Dems They Belong in 'Radical Centre' of British Politics". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 1 February 2013.
  18. Avlon, John (2004), pp. 26, 173, 223, 244, and 257.
  19. Satin (2004), pp. 10, 23, and 30
  20. Rosenberg, Jeff (17 March 1989). "Mark's Ism: New Options's Editor Builds a New Body Politic". Washington City Paper, pp 6–8.
  21. Gottlieb, Annie (1987). Do You Believe in Magic?: Bringing thev 60s Back Home. Simon & Schuster, p. 154. ISBN   978-0-671-66050-5.
  22. Satin (2004), p. 22.
  23. 1 2 Safire, William (14 June 1992). "On Language: Perotspeak". The New York Times Magazine, p. 193, page 006012 in The New York Times Archives. Retrieved 5 October 2018.
  24. Adler, Renata (1969). Toward a Radical Middle: Fourteen Pieces of Reporting and Criticism. Random House, pp. xiii–xxiv. ISBN   978-0-394-44916-6.
  25. 1 2 Adler (1969), p. xxiii.
  26. Warren, Donald I. (1976). The Radical Center: Middle Americans and the Politics of Alienation. University of Notre Dame Press, Chap. 1. ISBN   978-0-268-01594-7.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 Lind, Michael (20 April 2010). "Now More than Ever, We Need a Radical Center". Salon.com website. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
  28. Ferguson, Marilyn (1980). The Aquarian Conspiracy: Personal and Social Transformation in the 1980s. J. P. Tarcher Inc./Houghton Mifflin, pp. 228–29. ISBN   978-0-87477-191-6.
  29. Naisbitt, John (1982). Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives. Warner Books/Warner Communications Company, p. 178. ISBN   978-0-446-35681-7.
  30. Wolfe, Alan (1996). Marginalized in the Middle. University of Chicago Press, p. 16. ISBN   978-0-226-90516-7.
  31. Author unidentified (30 January 1995). "The 100 Smartest New Yorkers". New York Magazine, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 41.
  32. Crouch, Stanley (1995). The All-American Skin Game; or, The Decoy of Race. Pantheon Books, p. 1 of "Introduction". ISBN   978-0-679-44202-8.
  33. Satin (2004), p. 10.
  34. 1 2 3 4 Klein, Joe (24 September 1995). "Stalking the Radical Middle". Newsweek, vol. 126, no. 13, pp. 32–36. Web version identifies the author as "Newsweek Staff". Retrieved 18 January 2016.
  35. 1 2 Judis, John (16 October 1995). "TRB from Washington: Off Center". The New Republic, vol. 213, no. 16, pp. 4 and 56.
  36. Lind, Michael (3 December 1995). "The Radical Center or The Moderate Middle?" The New York Times Magazine, pp. 72–73. Retrieved 17 April 2013.
  37. Duffy, Michael (20 May 1991). "Looking for The Radical Middle". Time magazine, vol. 137, no. 20, p. 60. Retrieved 21 February 2013.
  38. Dionne, E. J. (1991). Why Americans Hate Politics. Touchstone/Simon & Schuster. ISBN   978-0-671-68255-2.
  39. Giddens, Anthony (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Polity Press, pp. 44–46. ISBN   978-0-7456-2267-5.
  40. 1 2 Andrews, Edward L. (4 June 2000). "Growing Club of Left-Leaning Leaders Strains to Find a Focus". The Nev York Times, p. 6.
  41. Giddens, Anthony (2000). The Third Way and Its Critics. Polity Press, Chap. 2 ("Social Democracy and the Third Way"). ISBN   978-0-7456-2450-1.
  42. 1 2 Reeves, Richard (19 September 2012). "The Case for a Truly Liberal Party". The New Statesman, p. 26. Retrieved 7 January 2013.
  43. Smith, Ben (7 February 2011). "The End of the DLC Era". Politico website. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  44. Halstead and Lind (2001), p. 263.
  45. Burns, James MacGregor; Sorenson, Georgia J. (1999). Dead Center: Clinton-Gore Leadership and the Perils of Moderation. Scribner, p. 221. ISBN   978-0-684-83778-9.
  46. Satin (2004), p. ix.
  47. Ray, Paul H.; Anderson, Sherry Ruth (2000). The Cultural Creatives: How 50 Million People Are Changing the World. Harmony Books/Random House, pp. xiv and 336. ISBN   978-0-609-60467-0.
  48. Satin (2004), p. 10 (citing "big-picture introductions" by Halstead-Lind and Miller).
  49. Wall, Wendy L. (2008). Inventing the 'American Way': The Politics of Consensus from the New Deal to the Civil Rights Movement. Oxford University Press, pp. 297–98 n. 25 (citing Avlon, Halstead-Lind, and Satin as contemporary calls to the creative center). ISBN   978-0-19-532910-0.
  50. Avlon (2004), p. 3.
  51. Avlon (2004), pp. 378–79.
  52. Miller (2003), p. xiv.
  53. Lind, Michael (1996). Up from Conservatism: Why the Right Is Wrong for America. Free Press / Simon & Schuster, p. 259. ISBN   978-0-684-83186-2.
  54. 1 2 3 4 Morin, Richard; Deane, Claudia (10 December 2001). "Big Thinker. Ted Halstead's New America Foundation Has It All: Money, Brains and Buzz". The Washington Post, Style section, p. 1.
  55. Gaard, Greta (1998). Ecological Politics: Ecofeminism and the Greens. Temple University Press, pp. 142–43. ISBN   978-1-56639-569-4.
  56. Halstead and Lind (2001), p. 16.
  57. Satin (2004), pp. 3–5.
  58. 1 2 3 4 Avlon (2004), pp. 277–93 ("Radical Centrists").
  59. Miller (2003), pp. ix–xiii.
  60. 1 2 Miller (2003), pp. xii–xii.
  61. Avlon (2004), p. 21.
  62. Halstead and Lind (2001), pp. 6–12.
  63. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Utne, Leif (September–October 2004). "The Radical Middle". Utne Reader, issue no. 125, pp. 80–85. Contains brief interviews with 10 radical centrists including Halstead, Satin, Tom Atlee, Laura Chasin, Joseph F. McCormick, and Joel Rogers. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  64. Satin (2004), pp. 5–6.
  65. Halstead and Lind (2001), pp. 13, 56-58, and 64.
  66. Satin (2004), pp. 14–17.
  67. Avlon (2004), pp. 1 and 13.
  68. Miller (2003), p. 52.
  69. Avlon (2004), p. 19.
  70. 1 2 Halstead and Lind (2001), pp. 223–24.
  71. Halstead and Lind (2001), p. 19.
  72. 1 2 Satin (2004), pp. 6–8.
  73. Miller (2003), Chap. 4.
  74. Miller (2003), cited above.
  75. Halstead and Lind (2001), p. 78.
  76. Miller (2003), p. 207.
  77. Halstead and Lind (2001), p. 154.
  78. Miller (2003), Chap. 7.
  79. Miiller (2003), Chap. 6.
  80. Satin (2004), Chap. 7.
  81. Avlon (2004), pp. 15 and 26–43 (on Theodore Roosevelt).
  82. Halstead and Lind (2001), p. 14.
  83. Miller (2003), Chap. 8.
  84. Satin (2004), pp. 92–93.
  85. Halstead and Lind (2001), pp. 170–76.
  86. Satin (2004), Chap. 8.
  87. Avlon (2004), pp. 257–76 (on Senator Edward W. Brooke).
  88. Satin (2004), Chaps. 13–15.
  89. Avlon (2004), pp. 10–13.
  90. Satin (2004), pp. 17–18.
  91. Halstead and Lind (2004), pp. 214–23.
  92. Avlon (2004), p. 18.
  93. Miller (2003), p. 230, and Postscript.
  94. Halstead and Lind (2001), pp. 109–28.
  95. Satin (2004), pp. 198–202.
  96. Miller, Matthew (2003a). The Two Percent Solution: Fixing America's Problems in Ways Liberals and Conservatives Can Love. Public Affairs / Perseus Books Group. Paperback edition, pp. 263–88. ISBN   978-1-58648-289-3.
  97. Satin (2004), Chap. 18.
  98. Halstead, ed. (2004), pp. v–vii and xiii.
  99. Silvera, Ian (26 August 2016). "Nick Clegg Calls Time on 'Complacent' Moderates After Brexit Vote". International Business Times , UK edition, online. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  100. Boyle, David (18 September 2017). "Sorry, Vince, the Centre Needs Big, Radical Ideas Before It Can Rise Again". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  101. 1 2 Ratner, Paul (22 December 2018). "Too Far Right and Left? D.C. Think Tank Releases Manifesto for Radical Centrism". Big Think web portal. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  102. Satin (2004), pp. 22–23 ("Franklin to Peters to You").
  103. 1 2 Carlson, Peter (30 April 2001). "Charlie Peters: The Genuine Article". The Washington Post, p. C01. Reprinted at the Peace Corps Online website. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  104. Peters, Charles (May 1983). "A Neoliberal's Manifesto". The Washington Monthly, pp. 8–18. Reproduced on The Washington Post website with a differently spelled title. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  105. "Articles" page. New America website. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  106. 1 2 Avlon, John (23 September 2012). "Political Independents: The Future of Politics?". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  107. 1 2 Friedman, Thomas (24 July 2011). "Make Way for the Radical Center". The New York Times, p. 5-SR. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  108. Klein, Joe (25 June 2007). "The Courage Primary". Time magazine, vol. 169, no. 26, p. 39. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  109. Miller, Matthew (24 June 2010). "A Case for 'Radical Centrism'". The Washington Post online. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  110. Leader (13 October 2012). "True Progressivism: Inequality and the World Economy". The Economist, p. 14 (U.S. edition). Retrieved 4 September 2013.
  111. J.C. (2 September 2013). "Is The Economist Left- or Right-Wing?" The Economist website. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
  112. 1 2 Khanna, Parag (2011). How to Run the World: Charting a Course to the Next Renaissance. Random House. ISBN   978-0-6796-0428-0.
  113. Lieven, Anatol; Hulsman, John (2006). Ethical Realism: A Vision for America's Role in the World. Pantheon Books / Random House, Introduction. ISBN   978-0-375-42445-8.
  114. Nordhaus, Ted; Shellenberger, Michael (2007). Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility. Houghton Mifflin, Introduction. ISBN   978-0-618-65825-1.
  115. McWhorter, John (2005). Winning the Race: Beyond the Crisis in Black America. Gotham Books / Penguin Group, Chap. 5. ISBN   978-1-59240-188-8.
  116. Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2016). Unfinished Business: Women Men Work Family. Random House. ISBN   978-0-8129-8497-2.
  117. Howard, Phiip K. (2019). Try Common Sense: Replacing the Failed Ideologies of Right and Left. W. W. Norton & Company, Introduction. ISBN   978-1-324-00176-8.
  118. Howard, Philip K. (13 April 2019). "A Radical Centrist Platform for 2020". The Hill . Retrieved 17 June 2019.
  119. Beinhocker, Eric D. (2006). The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics. Harvard Business School Press, pp. 11–13 and Chap. 18 ("Politics and Policy: The End of Left versus Right"). ISBN   978-1-57851-777-0.
  120. Haidt, Jonathan (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Pantheon Books, Introduction. ISBN   978-0-307-37790-6.
  121. Chickering, A. Lawrence; Turner, James S. (2008). Voice of the People: The Transpartisan Imperative in American Life. DaVinci Press, Part V. ISBN   978-0-615-21526-6.
  122. Beckett, Denis (2010). Radical Middle: Confessions of an Accidental Revolutionary. Tafelberg. ISBN   978-0-624-04912-8.
  123. 1 2 3 Chuchin, Katherine (2013). "Discursive Representation and Pearson’s Quest for a Radical Centre". Australian Journal of Political Science , vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 256–268.
  124. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Bello" column (7 September 2017). "The Appeal of Macronismo in Latin America: Rebuilding the Radical Centre". The Economist, vol. 424, no. 9057, p. 34 (U.S. edition). Print edition uses the sub-title only. Author of the "Bello" column was identified in the online masthead as journalist Michael Reid.
  125. Pearson, Noel (7 September 2010). "Nights When I Dream of a Better World: Moving from the Centre-Left to the Radical Centre of Australian Politics". The 2010 John Button Oration. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  126. Pearson, Noel (21 April 2007). "Hunt for the Radical Centre". The Australian. Reproduced on the Cape York Partnership website. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  127. Pearson, Noel (22 October 2016). "Hunt for the Radical Centre: Confronting Welfare Dependency". The Australian , p. 19. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
  128. Vaz, Sofia Guedes (2017). Environment: Why Read the Classics? Routledge, p. 18. ISBN   978-1-906093-75-4.
  129. Author unidentified (12 May 2011). "David Cameron and Nick Clegg Pledge ‘United' Coalition". BBC News website. Retrieved 4 February 2013.
  130. Clegg, Nick (13 March 2011). "Full Transcript, Speech to Liberal Democrat Spring Conference, Sheffield, 13 March 2011". New Statesman. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
  131. 1 2 Graham, Ron, ed. (1998). The Essential Trudeau. McClelland & Stewart, p. 71. ISBN   978-0-7710-8591-8.
  132. Thompson, Wayne C. (2017). Canada 2017–2018. Rowman & Littlefield, p. 135. ISBN   978-1-4758-3510-6.
  133. 1 2 Blaikie, Bill (2011). The Blaikie Report: An Insider's Look at Faith and Politics. United Church Publishing House / United Church of Canada, pp. 96–97. ISBN   978-1-55134-188-0.
  134. Hellyer, Paul (2010). Light at the End of the Tunnel: A Survival Plan for the Human Species. AuthorHouse, p. xi. ISBN   978-1-4490-7613-9.
  135. 1 2 3 Trew, Stuart (17 July 2017). "Trudeau and Macron, the Radical Centrists". Behind the Numbers website. The author is identified as an editor at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  136. 1 2 3 4 Shah, Ryan (18 July 2017). "Beware the Radical Center". CounterPunch website. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  137. 1 2 Applebaum, Anne (23 April 2017) "France's Election Reveals a New Political Divide". Washington Post online. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  138. 1 2 Zaretsky, Robert (24 April 2017). "The Radical Centrism of Emmanuel Macron". Foreign Policy . Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  139. 1 2 Anderson, Dave (16 May 2017) "Why the 'Radical Center' Must Be the Future of American Politics". The Hill newspaper. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  140. Filip, Alexandru (6 March 2018). "On New and Radical Centrism". Dahrendorf Forum website. Retrieved 15 January 2018.
  141. 1 2 Goldenberg, Rina (24 September 2017). "Germany’s Green Party: How It Evolved". DW News website. Retrieved 15 January 2018.
  142. Goldenberg (2017), cited above, "Re-orientation as environmentalism goes mainstream" section.
  143. 1 2 Karnitschnig, Matthew (27 January 2018). "German Greens Elect New Leadership Duo". Politico website. Retrieved 15 January 2018.
  144. 1 2 Hotovely, Tzipi (3 May 2012). "Beware 'the Radical Center'" Israel Hayom . Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  145. Halevi, Yossi Klein (2001). At the Entrance to the Garden of Eden: A Jew's Search for God with Christians and Muslims in the Holy Land. William Morrow. ISBN   978-0-688-16908-4.
  146. Halevi, Yossi Klein (2018). Letters to My Palestinian Neighbor . Harper. ISBN   978-0-06-284491-0.
  147. Halevi, Yossi Kleini (23 January 2013). "Why I Voted for Yair Lapid". Tablet . Retrieved 23 April 2018.
  148. Author unacknowledged (29 December 2017). "Lapid Would Win Big While Gabbay Would Crash, Poll Suggests". Haaretz . Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  149. 1 2 3 Persichilli, Angelo (22 March 2009). "On a Collision Course Toward the Radical Middle". Toronto Star, p. A17.
  150. 1 2 3 Author unidentified (10 February 2018). "Spain's Centrist Ciudadanos Are On the March". The Economist . Article is entitled "On the March" in the Europe section of the print edition. Retrieved 19 April 2018.
  151. 1 2 Author unspecified (11 November 2011). "Het Radicale Midden". HP/De Tijd . Dutch-language publication. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
  152. Author unspecified (20 January 2012). "Strategisch Beraad presenteert: Kiezen en Verbinden". Christian Democratic Appeal website. Dutch-language site. The English title of the report discussed here is "Making Choices and Connections". Retrieved 2 May 2018.
  153. 1 2 3 Brown, Stephen; von der Burchard, Hans (14 June 2016). "Albert Rivera, Spain's 'Radical Centrist'". Politico . Retrieved 19 April 2018.
  154. Spanish-language commentators and news outlets describing Rivera as radical centrist include:
  155. Author unidentified (22 December 2017). "Catalonia Election: Full Results". The Guardian . Retrieved 19 April 2018.
  156. Sifry, Micah L. (2003). Spoiling for a Fight: Third-Party Politics in America. Routledge, Section II ("Organizing the Angry Middle"). ISBN   978-0-415-93142-7.
  157. Miller (2003), p. 187.
  158. Halstead and Lind (2001), p. 115.
  159. Avlon (2004), p. 284.
  160. Miller (2003), p. 178.
  161. Halstead and Lind (2001), Chap. 5 ("The Politics of the Radical Center").
  162. Satin (2004), Part Six ("Be a Player, Not a Rebel").
  163. Avlon (2004), p. 277.
  164. Richardson, Elliot (1996). Reflections of a Radical Moderate. Pantheon Books, Preface. ISBN   978-0-679-42820-6.
  165. Grunwald, Michael (25 June 2007). "The New Action Heroes". Time magazine, vol. 169, no. 26, pp. 32–38. Cover story.
  166. Avlon, John P. (26 October 2008). "The Stand-Out Centrists of 2008". Politico . Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  167. Friedman, Thomas L. (24 March 2010). "A Tea Party Without Nuts". The New York Times, p. A27. Retrieved 5 February 2013.
  168. Friedman, Thomas L.; Mandelbaum, Michael (2011). That Used To Be Us: How America Fell Behind in the World It Invented and How We Can Come Back. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, pp. 353–368. ISBN   978-0-374-28890-7.
  169. Miller, Matt (11 November 2010). "Why We Need a Third Party of (Radical) Centrists". The Washington Post online. Retrieved 5 February 2013.
  170. Future 500. Official website. Retrieved 15 December 2013.
  171. Shireman, Bill (5 April 2009). "The Radical Middle Wins in Iowa". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 15 December 2013.
  172. Shireman, Bill (20 April 2009). "Time for a Tea Party with the Right: Why Progressives Need a Transpartisan Strategy". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 5 February 2013.
  173. Miller, Matt (25 September 2011). "The Third-Party Stump Speech We Need". The Washington Post online. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
  174. Sachs, Jeffrey R. (2011). The Price of Civilization: Reawakening American Virtue and Prosperity. Random House, pp. 247–48. ISBN   978-0-8129-8046-2.
  175. Rucker, Philip (13 December 2010). "No Labels Movement Launched in N.Y., Pledges to Fight Partisanship." The Washington Post online. Retrieved 2 January 2017.
  176. 1 2 3 4 Nelson, Rebecca (30 October 2015). "The War On Partisanship." The Atlantic online. Retrieved 2 January 2017.
  177. Brooks, David (29 November 2016). "The Future of the American Center". The New York Times, p. 27. Titled "New Life in the Center" in the print edition. Retrieved 1 April 2017.
  178. Miller, Matt (November–December 2014). "Mr. Miller Doesn't Go to Washington: A Candidate's Memoir". Politico Magazine. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  179. Weigel, Dave; Sullivan, Sean (4 January 2018). "Doug Jones Is Sworn In, Shrinking GOP Senate Majority". The Washington Post, p. A6. The e-version is dated 3 January 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  180. Fandos, Nicholas (22 January 2018). "With Talking Stick in Hand, Moderate Senators Broker the Shutdown". The New York Times, p. A17. Print edition carries a different title. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  181. 1 2 Fricklas, Michael (30 March 2018). "The Time for Radical Centrism Has Come". The Hill . Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  182. Feiffer, Jules (21 January 1962). "We've All Heard of the Radical Right and the Radical Left ... ". Library of Congress website. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
  183. Feiffer, Jules (2010). Backing into Forward: A Memoir. Nan A. Talese / Doubleday, p. 345. ISBN   978-0-385-53158-0.
  184. Mouffe, Chantal (summer 1998). "The Radical Centre: A Politics Without Adversary". Soundings, issue no. 9, pp. 11–23.
  185. Mouffe (summer 1998), p. 12.
  186. 1 2 3 Kuttner, Robert (19 February 2012). "The Radical Center we Don't Need". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 6 February 2013.
  187. 1 2 Kilgore, Ed (June 2004). "Good Government: Time to Stop Bashing the Two-Party System". The Washington Monthly, pp. 58–59.
  188. Kuttner, Robert (20 November 2003). "The 2-Percent Illusion". The American Prospect . Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  189. Kahlenberg, Richard (19 December 2001). "Radical in the Center". American Prospect, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 41. Print version d. 3 December 2001. Retrieved 6 February 2013.
  190. Joyner, James (2010-03-24). "Radical Center: Friedman's Fantasy". Outside the Beltway. Retrieved 2013-04-30
  191. Curchin, Katherine (December 2015). "Noel Pearson's Role in the Northern Territory Intervention: Radical Centrist or Polarising Partisan?" Australian Journal of Politics and History , vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 576–590.
  192. 1 2 Ponnuru, Ramesh (24 March 2010). "The Corner: Tom Friedman's Radical Confusion". National Review Online. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
  193. MacGillis, Alec (26 October 2011). "Third Wheel". The New Republic, vol. 242, no. 17, p. 8. Print version d. 17 November 2011. Retrieved 7 February 2013.
  194. MacGillis, Alec (2 November 2011). "Beware: 'Radical Centrists' On the March!". The New Republic online. Retrieved 5 February 2011.
  195. Avlon, John (2010). Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe Is Hijacking America. Beast Books / Perseus Books Group, pp. 1–3 and 238–39. ISBN   978-0-9842951-1-1.
  196. Satin, Mark (fall 2002). "Where's the Juice?". The Responsive Community, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 74–75. Retrieved 5 February 2013.
  197. Satin (2004), p. 27.
  198. Gerzon, Mark (2006). Leading Through Conflict: How Successful Leaders Transform Differences into Opportunity. Harvard Business School Press, pp. 4–8. ISBN   978-1-59139-919-3.
  199. Gerzon (2006, Chaps. 9–10.
  200. Gerzon (2006), Chap. 11.
  201. Bloch, Karen Lehrman (5 October 2017). "Toward a Radical Middle". Jewish Journal, hard-copy issue dated 6 October 2017, p. 9. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  202. Gerzon, Mark (2016). The Reunited States of America: How We Can Bridge the Partisan Divide. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, pp. 109–110. ISBN   978-1-62656-658-3.
  203. 1 2 Gomaa, Ali (September 2012). "The Radical Middle: Building Bridges Between the Muslim and Western Worlds". UN Chronicle , vol. XLIX, no. 3, pp. 4–6. Retrieved 11 November 2017. The author describes himself as co-chair of C1 World Dialogue.
  204. Gerzon (2016), pp. 63–64.
  205. Satin, Mark (1991). New Options for America: The Second American Experiment Has Begun. The Press at California State University, Fresno, pp. 209–212. ISBN   978-0-8093-1794-3.
  206. Gerzon (2016), pp. 60–61.
  207. Gerzon (2016), pp. 53–54.
  208. Satin (1991), Chap. 24 ("Win Every 'Battle' – or Change the Discourse?").
  209. 1 2 Binder, Amy; Kidder, Jeffrey (30 October 2018). "If You Think Campus Speech Is All Angry Confrontation, You're Looking in the Wrong Places". The Washington Post . Retrieved 8 February 2019.
  210. Jandhyala, Pranav (27 April 2017). "Why I Invited Ann Coulter to Speak at Berkeley". Berkeley News, digital outlet of the Office of Communications and Public Affairs, UC Berkeley. The author identifies himself as founder of the UC Berkeley chapter of BridgeUSA. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
  211. Wilson, G. Willow (July–August 2005). "The Show-Me Sheikh". The Atlantic , vol. 296, no. 1, p. 40. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  212. Gomaa (2012), p. 5.
  213. Boyer, Nate (26 May 2017). "Honoring Fallen on Memorial Day Means Honoring Right to Protest". USA Today online. See second section ("Fighting from the radical middle"). Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  214. Waggoner, Nick, ed. (13 October 2017). "Ex-Green Beret Nick Boyer Writes Open Latter to Trump, Kaepernick, NFL and America". ESPN.com. See last paragraph. Retrieved 16 October 2017.

Further reading

Books from the 1990s

  • Chickering, A. Lawrence (1993). Beyond Left and Right: Breaking the Political Stalemate. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press. ISBN   978-1-55815-209-0.
  • Coyle, Diane (1997). The Weightless World: Strategies for Managing the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. ISBN   978-0-262-03259-9.
  • Esty, Daniel C.; Chertow, Marian, eds. (1997). Thinking Ecologically: The Next Generation of Ecological Policy. Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-07303-4.
  • Howard, Philip K. (1995). The Death of Common Sense: How Law Is Suffocating America. Random House. ISBN   978-0-679-42994-4.
  • Penny, Tim; Garrett, Major (1998). The 15 Biggest Lies in Politics. St. Martin's Press. ISBN   978-0-312-18294-6.
  • Sider, Ronald J. (1999). Just Generosity: A New Vision for Overcoming Poverty in America. Baker Books. ISBN   978-0-8010-6613-9.
  • Ventura, Jesse (2000). I Ain't Got Time to Bleed: Reworking the Body Politic from the Bottom Up. New York: Signet. ISBN   0451200861.
  • Wolfe, Alan (1998). One Nation, After All: What Middle-Class Americans Really Think. Viking. ISBN   978-0-670-87677-8.

Books from the 2000s

  • Anderson, Walter Truett (2001). All Connected Now: Life in the First Global Civilization. Westview Press. ISBN   978-0-8133-3937-5.
  • Florida, Richard (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Basic Books. ISBN   978-0-465-02476-6.
  • Friedman, Thomas (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux. ISBN   0-374-29288-4
  • Lukes, Steven (2009). The Curious Enlightenment of Professor Caritat: A Novel of Ideas. Verso Books, 2nd ed. ISBN   978-1-84467-369-8.
  • Miller, Matt (2009). The Tyranny of Dead Ideas: Letting Go of the Old Ways of Thinking to Unleash a New Prosperity. Henry Holt and Company. ISBN   978-0-8050-9150-2.
  • Penner, Rudolph; Sawhill, Isabel; Taylor, Timothy (2000). Updating America's Social Contract: Economic Growth and Opportunity in the New Century. W. W. Norton and Co., Chap. 1 ("An Agenda for the Radical Middle"). ISBN   978-0-393-97579-6.
  • Ury, William (2000). The Third Side: Why We Fight and How We Can Stop. Penguin Books. ISBN   978-0-14-029634-1.
  • Wexler, David B.; Winick, Bruce, eds. (2003). Judging in a Therapeutic Key: Therapeutic Justice and the Courts. Carolina Academic Press. ISBN   978-0-89089-408-8.
  • Whitman, Christine Todd (2005). It's My Party, Too: The Battle for the Heart of the GOP and the Future of America. The Penguin Press, Chap. 7 ("A Time for Radical Moderates"). ISBN   978-1-59420-040-3.

Books from the 2010s

  • Brock, H. Woody (2012). American Gridlock: Why the Right and Left Are Both Wrong. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-0-470-63892-7.
  • Clegg, Nick (2017). Politics: Between the Extremes, international edition. Vintage. ISBN   978-1-78470-416-2.
  • Edwards, Mickey (2012). The Parties Versus the People: How to Turn Republicans and Democrats Into Americans. Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-18456-3.
  • Friedman, Thomas; Mandelbaum, Michael (2011). That Used to be Us: How America Fell Behind in the World It Invented and How We Can Come Back. Picador. ISBN   978-0374288907.
  • Huntsman Jr., John, editor (2014). No Labels: A Shared Vision for a Stronger America. Diversion Books. ISBN   978-1-62681-237-6.
  • Macron, Emmanuel (2017). Revolution. Scribe Publications. ISBN   978-1-925322-71-2.
  • Orman, Greg (2016). A Declaration of Independents: How we Can Break the Two-Party Stranglehold and Restore the American Dream. Greenleaf Book Group Press. ISBN   978-1-62634-332-0.
  • Pearson, Noel (2011). Up From the Mission: Selected Writings. Black Inc. 2nd ed. Part Four ("The Quest for a Radical Centre"). ISBN   978-1-86395-520-1.
  • Salit, Jacqueline S. (2012). Independents Rising: Outsider Movements, Third Parties, and the Struggle for a Post-Partisan America. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   978-0-230-33912-5.
  • Trudeau, Justin (2015). Common Ground. HarperCollins. ISBN   978-1-4434-3338-9.
  • Whelan, Charles (2013). The Centrist Manifesto. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN   978-0-393-34687-9.
  • White, Courtney (2017). Grassroots: The Rise of the Radical Center and The Next West. Dog Ear Publishing. ISBN   978-1-4575-5431-5.



Opinion websites