Social responsibility

Last updated
Social responsibility from businesses such as providing recycling bins can in turn provide opportunities for people to be socially responsible by recycling Sorted waste containers in Taiwan.jpg
Social responsibility from businesses such as providing recycling bins can in turn provide opportunities for people to be socially responsible by recycling

Social responsibility is an ethical framework in which a person works and cooperates with other people and organizations for the benefit of the community. [1]

Contents

An organization can demonstrate social responsibility in several ways, for instance, by donating, encouraging volunteerism, using ethical hiring procedures, and making changes that benefit the environment. [2]

Social responsibility is an individual responsibility that involves a balance between the economy and the ecosystem one lives within, [3] and possible trade-offs between economic development, and the welfare of society and the environment. [4] Social responsibility pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose actions impact the environment. [5]

History

Writers in the classical Western philosophical tradition acknowledged the importance of social responsibility for human thriving.

Aristotle

Aristotle determined that “Man is by nature a political animal.” [6] : I.2 

He saw ethics and politics as mutually-reinforcing: a citizen develops the virtues in large part so that they can contribute to making the polis an excellent and stable one. And the purpose of that was so that the polis would be fertile soil in which a thriving, virtuous citizenry could grow (and in order that there could be an appropriate political context in which one could successfully practice virtues like justice which require a political context). [6] : I.1–2, III.4, VII.1–3  [7] : II.1, V.6, X.9 

He believed that the polis is meant to be “a community of equals for the sake of a life which is potentially the best.” [6] : VII.8  Some of the virtues in his scheme of virtue ethics, like magnificence and justice were inseparable from a sense of social responsibility. [7] : IV.2, V 

Ancient Rome

Cicero believed that “In no other realm does human excellence approach so closely the paths of the gods as it does in the founding of new and in the preservation of already founded communities.” [8]

In the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius, he wrote that “That which isn't good for the hive isn't good for the bee.” [9]

Modern times

In 1953, the book "Social responsibility of the businessman" published by the American economist Howard Bowen was one of the first to address the issue of social responsibility as it relates to business activity. [10]

Individual social responsibility

One can be socially responsible passively, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or actively, by performing activities that advance social goals. Social responsibility has an intergenerational aspect, since the actions of one generation have consequences for their posterity, and also can be more or less respectful for their ancestors. [11]

Social responsibility can require a degree of boldness or courage. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, for example, believed that “we have gotten used to regarding as valor only valor in war (or the kind that's needed for flying in outer space), the kind which jingle-jangles with medals. We have forgotten another concept of valor—civil valor. And that's all our society needs, just that, just that, just that!” [12]

Another way to be socially responsible is by being careful not to spread information that you have not diligently vetted for its truth. In the modern information environment, “the stakes of credulity are simply too high,” says Francisco Mejia Uribe. Socially responsible people have “the moral obligation to believe only what we have diligently investigated.” And a socially responsible person “in her capacity as communicator of belief… has the moral responsibility not to pollute the well of collective knowledge and instead to strive to sustain its integrity.” [13]

Scientists and engineers

The social responsibility of scientists and engineers can influence how robots are programmed Wolfgang Ischinger mit Roboter Sophia MSC 2018.jpg
The social responsibility of scientists and engineers can influence how robots are programmed

Are scientists and engineers morally responsible for the negative consequences that result from applications of their knowledge and inventions? [14] If scientists and engineers take pride in the positive achievements of science and technology, shouldn't they also accept responsibility for the negative consequences related to the use or abuse of scientific knowledge and technological innovations? [15] Scientists and engineers have a collective responsibility to examine the values embedded in the research problems they choose and the ethics of how they share their findings with the public. [16] [ editorializing ]

Committees of scientists and engineers are often involved in planning governmental and corporate research programs, including those devoted to the development of military technologies and weaponry. [17] [18] Many professional societies and national organizations, such as the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in the United States, have ethical guidelines (see Engineering ethics and Research ethics for the conduct of scientific research and engineering). [19] Scientists and engineers, individually and collectively, have a special and greater responsibility than average citizens with respect to the generation and use of scientific knowledge.

Some argue that because of the complexity of social responsibility in research, scientists and engineers should not be blamed for all the evils created by new scientific knowledge and technological innovations. [14] First, there is fragmentation and diffusion of responsibility: Because of the intellectual and physical division of labor, the resulting fragmentation of knowledge, the high degree of specialization, and the complex and hierarchical decision-making process within corporations and government research laboratories, it is exceedingly difficult for individual scientists and engineers to control the applications of their innovations. [17] This fragmentation of work and decision-making results in fragmented moral accountability, often to the point where "everybody involved was responsible but none could be held responsible." [20]

Another problem is ignorance. The scientists and engineers cannot predict how their newly generated knowledge and technological innovations may be abused or misused. The excuse of ignorance is stronger for scientists involved in very basic and fundamental research where potential applications cannot be even envisioned, than for scientists and engineers involved in applied scientific research and technological innovation since in such work objectives are well-known. For example, most corporations conduct research on specific products or services that promise to yield profit for share-holders. Similarly, most of the research funded by governments is mission-oriented, such as protecting the environment, developing new drugs, or designing more lethal weapons. In cases where the application of scientific knowledge and technological innovation is well-known a priori, a scientist or engineer cannot escape responsibility for research and technological innovation that is morally dubious. [21] As John Forge writes in Moral Responsibility and the Ignorant Scientist: "Ignorance is not an excuse precisely because scientists can be blamed for being ignorant." [22]

Another point of view is that responsibility falls on those who provide the funding for the research and technological developments (in most cases corporations and government agencies). Because taxpayers provide the funds for government-sponsored research, they and the politicians that represent them should perhaps be held accountable for the uses and abuses of science. [23] In times past scientists could often conduct research independently, but today's experimental research requires expensive laboratories and instrumentation, making scientists dependent on those who pay for their studies.

Quasi-legal instruments, or soft law, has received some normative status in relation to private and public corporations in the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights developed by the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee particularly in relation to child and maternal welfare.[ clarification needed ] [24] : 7  The International Organization for Standardization will "encourage voluntary commitment to social responsibility and will lead to common guidance on concepts, definitions and methods of evaluation." [25]

Corporate social responsibility

Ethical decision-making by businesses can prevent costly government intervention in those businesses. [26] For instance, if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions of dangerous pollutants and goes further to involve the community and address concerns the public might have, they might be less likely to have the EPA investigate them. [26] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of shareholders; if there is no outcry, this limits regulation. [27]

Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, such as "greenwashing"; [28] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly positive correlation with improved shareholder returns. [29]

While many corporations include social responsibility in their operations, those procuring their goods and services may also independently ensure these products are socially sustainable. Verification tools are available from many entities internationally, [30] for example the Underwriters Laboratories environmental standards, BioPreferred, and Green Seal. A corporate reputation aligned with social responsibility is linked to higher profits, particularly when firms voluntarily report the positive and negative impacts of their social responsibility endeavors. [31]

Certification processes like these help corporations and their consumers identify potential risks associated with a product's lifecycle and enable end users to confirm the corporation's practices adhere to social responsibility ideals. A reputation for social responsibility leads to more positive responses toward a brand's products by inducing a reciprocal desire to help companies that have helped others, an effect that is more prominent among consumers who value helping others and is reduced if consumers doubt a firm's intentions. [32]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Jensen, Derrick (2006). "Responsibility". Endgame. Vol. II. Toronto, Ont.: Seven Stories Press. p. 696. ISBN   978-1583227305.
  2. ↑ Ganti, Akhilesh. "Social Responsibility in Business: Meaning, Types, Examples, and Criticism". Investopedia. Archived from the original on 2023-08-27. Retrieved 2023-08-27.
  3. ↑ Anheier, Helmut K.; Toepler, Stefan (2009). International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. U.S.A.: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 577.
  4. ↑
  5. ↑ "Perceptions and Definitions of Social Responsibility" (PDF). Winnipeg, Manitoba: International Institute for Sustainable Development. May 2004. p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-10-07.
  6. 1 2 3 Aristotle. Politics .
  7. 1 2 Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics .
  8. ↑ Cicero, De Legibus
  9. ↑ Marcus Aurelius. Meditations . VI.64.
  10. ↑ Wherry, Frederick F.; Schor, Juliet B. (2015). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Economics and Society. U.S.A.: SAGE Publications. p. 476.
  11. ↑ Invernizzi, Diletta Colette; Locatelli, Giorgio; Brookes, Naomi J. (2017-10-01). "Managing social challenges in the nuclear decommissioning industry: A responsible approach towards better performance" (PDF). International Journal of Project Management. Social Responsibilities for the Management of Megaprojects. 35 (7): 1350–1364. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.002. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-06-17. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  12. ↑ Solzhenitsyn, Alexander (1973). The Gulag Archipelago, 1918–1956. Vol. 1: An Experiment in Literary Investigation.
  13. ↑ Mejia Uribe, Francisco (12 January 2021). "To be a responsible citizen today, it is not enough to be reasonable". Psyche. Archived from the original on 30 August 2023. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  14. 1 2
  15. ↑ Ziman, J. (1971). "Social responsibility (I) – The impact of social responsibility on science". Impact of Science on Society. 21 (2): 113–122.
  16. ↑ Resnik, D. B.; Elliott, K. C. (2016). "The ethical challenges of socially responsible science". Accountability in Research. 23 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.1002608. PMC   4631672 . PMID   26193168.
  17. 1 2 Collins, F. (1972). "Social ethics and the conduct of science – Specialization and the fragmentation of responsibility". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 196 (4): 213–222. Bibcode:1972NYASA.196..213C. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb21230.x. PMID   4504112. S2CID   38345454.
  18. ↑ Leitenberg, M. (1971). "Social responsibility (II) – The classical scientific ethic and strategic-weapons development". Impact of Science on Society. 21 (2): 123–136.
  19. ↑ On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research (Third ed.). The National Academies Press. 2009. doi:10.17226/12192. ISBN   9780309119702. PMID   25009901. Archived from the original on 2023-08-30. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  20. ↑ Lowrance, W.W. (1985). Modern science and human values. Oxford University Press. p. 75.
  21. ↑ Ravetz, J.R. (1996). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers. p. 415.
  22. ↑ Forge, J (2000). "Moral responsibility and the ignorant scientist". Science and Engineering Ethics. 6 (3): 341–349. doi:10.1007/s11948-000-0036-9. PMID   11273459. S2CID   40073027.
  23. ↑ Beckwith, J.; Huang, F. (2005). "Should we make a fuss? A case for social". Nature Biotechnology. 23 (12): 1479–1480. doi:10.1038/nbt1205-1479. PMID   16333283. S2CID   20366847.
  24. ↑ Faucet, T.A.; Nasu, H. (2009). "Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights" (PDF). Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 34 (3): 1–26. doi:10.1093/jmp/jhp021. PMID   19395367. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-11. Retrieved 2009-06-18.
  25. ↑ ISO 26000: Social responsibility. 2009. p. 8.
  26. 1 2 Kaliski, B., ed. (2001). "Ethics in Management". Encyclopedia of Business and Finance. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Reference. p. 2.
  27. ↑ Armstrong, J. Scott (1977). "Social Irresponsibility in Management" (PDF). Journal of Business Research. Elsevier North-Holland Inc. 5 (3): 185–213. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(77)90011-X. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-11-17.
  28. ↑ Góngora, Alejos; Lucía, Claudia (2013). "Greenwashing: Only the Appearance of Sustainability". IESE Insight. Archived from the original on 2020-03-12. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  29. ↑
  30. ↑ "Resources for Verifying Sustainable Products". Sustainable Facilities Tool. Archived from the original on 2022-10-04. Retrieved 2016-03-11.
  31. ↑ Johnson, Z. (January 2019). "Self-Reporting CSR Activities: When Your Company Harms, Do You Self-Disclose?". Corporate Reputation Review. 21 (4): 153–164. doi:10.1057/s41299-018-0051-x. S2CID   170000354.
  32. ↑ Johnson, Z. (2019). "Good Guys Can Finish First: How Brand Reputation Affects Extension Evaluations" . Journal of Consumer Psychology. 29 (4): 565–583. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1109. S2CID   150973752. Archived from the original on 2020-08-07. Retrieved 2020-05-07.

Further reading

Related Research Articles

Business ethics is a form of applied ethics or professional ethics, that examines ethical principles and moral or ethical problems that can arise in a business environment. It applies to all aspects of business conduct and is relevant to the conduct of individuals and entire organizations. These ethics originate from individuals, organizational statements or the legal system. These norms, values, ethical, and unethical practices are the principles that guide a business.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Technology</span> Use of knowledge for practical goals

Technology is the application of conceptual knowledge for achieving practical goals, especially in a reproducible way. The word technology can also mean the products resulting from such efforts, including both tangible tools such as utensils or machines, and intangible ones such as software. Technology plays a critical role in science, engineering, and everyday life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Innovation</span> Practical implementation of improvements

Innovation is the practical implementation of ideas that result in the introduction of new goods or services or improvement in offering goods or services. ISO TC 279 in the standard ISO 56000:2020 defines innovation as "a new or changed entity, realizing or redistributing value". Others have different definitions; a common element in the definitions is a focus on newness, improvement, and spread of ideas or technologies.

Accountability, in terms of ethics and governance, is equated with answerability, culpability, liability, and the expectation of account-giving.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporate social responsibility</span> Form of corporate self-regulation aimed at contributing to social or charitable goals

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) or corporate social impact is a form of international private business self-regulation which aims to contribute to societal goals of a philanthropic, activist, or charitable nature by engaging in, with, or supporting professional service volunteering through pro bono programs, community development, administering monetary grants to non-profit organizations for the public benefit, or to conduct ethically oriented business and investment practices. While once it was possible to describe CSR as an internal organizational policy or a corporate ethic strategy similar to what is now known today as Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG); that time has passed as various companies have pledged to go beyond that or have been mandated or incentivized by governments to have a better impact on the surrounding community. In addition national and international standards, laws, and business models have been developed to facilitate and incentivize this phenomenon. Various organizations have used their authority to push it beyond individual or even industry-wide initiatives. In contrast, it has been considered a form of corporate self-regulation for some time, over the last decade or so it has moved considerably from voluntary decisions at the level of individual organizations to mandatory schemes at regional, national, and international levels. Moreover, scholars and firms are using the term "creating shared value", an extension of corporate social responsibility, to explain ways of doing business in a socially responsible way while making profits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Science and technology studies</span> Academic field

Science and technology studies (STS) or science, technology, and society is an interdisciplinary field that examines the creation, development, and consequences of science and technology in their historical, cultural, and social contexts.

Technocapitalism or tech-capitalism refers to changes in capitalism associated with the emergence of new technology sectors, the power of corporations, and new forms of organization. Technocapitalism is characterised by constant innovation, global competition, the digitisation of information and communication, and the growing importance of digital networks and platforms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public participation (decision making)</span> Extent to which societies encourage the people to share in organizational decision-making

Citizen participation or public participation in social science refers to different mechanisms for the public to express opinions—and ideally exert influence—regarding political, economic, management or other social decisions. Participatory decision-making can take place along any realm of human social activity, including economic, political, management, cultural or familial.

The ethics of technology is a sub-field of ethics addressing the ethical questions specific to the Technology Age, the transitional shift in society wherein personal computers and subsequent devices provide for the quick and easy transfer of information. Technology ethics is the application of ethical thinking to the growing concerns of technology as new technologies continue to rise in prominence.

Research funding is a term generally covering any funding for scientific research, in the areas of natural science, technology, and social science. Different methods can be used to disburse funding, but the term often connotes funding obtained through a competitive process, in which potential research projects are evaluated and only the most promising receive funding. It is often measured via Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD).

Professional responsibility is a set of duties within the concept of professional ethics for those who exercise a unique set of knowledge and skill as professionals.

John Michael Ziman was a British-born New Zealand physicist and humanist who worked in the area of condensed matter physics. He was a spokesman for science, as well as a teacher and author.

A Hippocratic Oath for scientists is an oath similar to the Hippocratic Oath for medical professionals, adapted for scientists. Multiple varieties of such an oath have been proposed. Joseph Rotblat has suggested that an oath would help make new scientists aware of their social and moral responsibilities; opponents, however, have pointed to the "very serious risks for the scientific community" posed by an oath, particularly the possibility that it might be used to shut down certain avenues of research, such as stem cells.

Animal ethics is a branch of ethics which examines human-animal relationships, the moral consideration of animals and how nonhuman animals ought to be treated. The subject matter includes animal rights, animal welfare, animal law, speciesism, animal cognition, wildlife conservation, wild animal suffering, the moral status of nonhuman animals, the concept of nonhuman personhood, human exceptionalism, the history of animal use, and theories of justice. Several different theoretical approaches have been proposed to examine this field, in accordance with the different theories currently defended in moral and political philosophy. There is no theory which is completely accepted due to the differing understandings of what is meant by the term ethics; however, there are theories that are more widely accepted by society such as animal rights and utilitarianism.

A corporate social entrepreneur (CSE) is someone who attempts to advance a social agenda in addition to a formal job role as part of a corporation. It is possible for CSEs to work in organizational contexts that are favourable to corporate social responsibility (CSR). CSEs focus on developing both social capital and economic capital, and their formal job role may not always align with corporate social responsibility. A person in a non-executive or managerial position can still be considered a CSE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Technology and society</span> Overview of the relationship between technology and society

Technology, society and life or technology and culture refers to the inter-dependency, co-dependence, co-influence, and co-production of technology and society upon one another. Evidence for this synergy has been found since humanity first started using simple tools. The inter-relationship has continued as modern technologies such as the printing press and computers have helped shape society. The first scientific approach to this relationship occurred with the development of tektology, the "science of organization", in early twentieth century Imperial Russia. In modern academia, the interdisciplinary study of the mutual impacts of science, technology, and society, is called science and technology studies.

Basic research, also called pure research, fundamental research, basic science, or pure science, is a type of scientific research with the aim of improving scientific theories for better understanding and prediction of natural or other phenomena. In contrast, applied research uses scientific theories to develop technology or techniques which can be used to intervene and alter natural or other phenomena. Though often driven simply by curiosity, basic research often fuels the technological innovations of applied science. The two aims are often practiced simultaneously in coordinated research and development.

Research integrity or scientific integrity is a form of scientific ethics that deals with "best practice" or rules of professional practice of researchers.

Peter Mark Pruzan is a Danish organizational theorist, management consultant, and Emeritus Professor of Systems Science at the Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy at the Copenhagen Business School (CBS) in Denmark. Pruzan is known for work on corporate governance and values-based leadership. He became a naturalized Danish citizen in 1973.

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a term used by the European Union's Framework Programmes to describe scientific research and technological development processes that take into account effects and potential impacts on the environment and society. It gained visibility around the year 2010, arising from predecessors including "ELSA" studies prompted by the Human Genome Project. Various slightly different definitions of RRI emerged, but all of them agree that societal challenges should be a primary focus of scientific research, and moreover they agree upon the methods by which that goal should be achieved. RRI involves holding research to high ethical standards, ensuring gender equality in the scientific community, investing policy-makers with the responsibility to avoid harmful effects of innovation, engaging the communities affected by innovation and ensuring that they have the knowledge necessary to understand the implications by furthering science education and Open Access. Organizations that adopted the RRI terminology include the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.