Walter Block

Last updated

Walter Block
Walter Block by Gage Skidmore.jpg
Walter Block speaking in May 2016
Born
Walter Edward Block

(1941-08-21) August 21, 1941 (age 83)
New York City, U.S.
Education Brooklyn College (BA)
Columbia University (PhD)
Academic career
Field Political economy, environmental economics, transport economics, political philosophy
School or
tradition
Austrian School
Doctoral
advisor
Gary Becker, William Landes
Influences Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Ron Paul, Lew Rockwell, H.L. Mencken
Contributions Evictionism
Signature
Walter Block signature (transparent).png

Walter Edward Block (born August 21, 1941) is an American Austrian School economist and anarcho-capitalist theorist. [1] He was the Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair in Economics at the School of Business at Loyola University New Orleans and a former senior fellow of the non-profit think-tank Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. [2]

Contents

Personal life

Walter Block was born in Brooklyn, New York to Jewish parents Abraham Block, a certified public accountant, and Ruth Block, a paralegal, both of whom Block has said were liberals. [3] He attended James Madison High School, where Bernie Sanders was on his track team. [4] Block earned his PhD degree in economics from Columbia University and wrote his dissertation on rent control in the United States under Gary Becker. [5] Block identifies himself as a "devout atheist". [6]

In an interview, Block stated, "In the fifties and sixties, I was just another commie living in Brooklyn." [7] Block credits his shift to libertarianism to his having attended a lecture by Ayn Rand while he was an undergraduate student. [3] Block later attended a luncheon with Rand, Nathaniel Branden, and Leonard Peikoff at which Branden suggested that Block read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt. [3] He says that the final push to his conversion came from having met Austrian School and anarcho-capitalist theorist Murray Rothbard. [3] While Block is an anarcho-capitalist and, unlike the Objectivist followers of Ayn Rand, ultimately opposed to limited or minimal government; and even while criticizing her movement as "cultish", Block still describes himself as "a big fan" of Rand and considers Atlas Shrugged to be "the best novel ever written." [8] [ better source needed ]

Professional career

Walter Block Walterblock.jpg
Walter Block

Walter Block received a B.A. in philosophy from Brooklyn College in 1964 and a PhD in economics from Columbia University in 1972. He taught at the University of Central Arkansas, Holy Cross College, Baruch College and Rutgers University. He now holds the Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair in Economics at the Butt College of Business, Loyola University, in New Orleans. [9]

From 1979 to 1991, Block was the senior economist with the Fraser Institute. [5] He was also a senior fellow at the think-tank Ludwig von Mises Institute from 2000–2024, where he has published various blog posts, papers, and books. [9] [10]

In the years since 1971, his work has been published in the Journal of Libertarian Studies , the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics , the Review of Austrian Economics , the American Journal of Economics and Sociology , the Journal of Labor Economics and Public Choice [11] [12] and in Psychology Today and other popular media. [13] In 2017, he hit the milestone of publishing over 500 peer-reviewed articles. [14]

Defending the Undefendable

Walter Block has written two dozen books. [15] He is best known for his 1976 book Defending the Undefendable . [16] [17] The book has been translated into ten foreign languages. [9] Fox Business Channel pundit John Stossel wrote that Block's "eye-opening" book inspired him to see that economics "illuminates what common sense overlooks." [18]

Viewpoints

Slavery and segregation

"Voluntary slave contract"

Block believes that people should have the legal right to sell themselves into slavery, or to buy and keep slaves who have sold themselves into slavery, in a libertarian legal order.[ citation needed ]

In an essay on "inalienability" of natural and legal rights, Block defends what he calls a "voluntary slave contract", arguing that it is "a bona fide contract where consideration crosses hands; when it is abrogated, theft occurs". He notes that Robert Nozick agrees with him, and critiques the views of the libertarians who disagree. Block seeks to make "a tiny adjustment" which "strengthens libertarianism by making it more internally consistent." He argues that his position shows "that contract, predicated on private property [can] reach to the furthest realms of human interaction, even to voluntary slave contracts." [19]

Slavery and civil rights in the United States

A January 2014 article in the New York Times said Block "suggested in an interview that the daily life of the enslaved was 'not so bad – you pick cotton and sing songs.'" [20] The piece also reported that Block said Woolworth's had the right to exclude black people from its lunch counters, asserting that "no one is compelled to associate with people against their will." Block responded to the article by accusing the Times of libel for taking quotes out of context and claiming the latter quote was not accurate. [21] In his response he called slavery "depraved and monstrous," arguing that it is not the nature of the work slaves perform that makes slavery monstrous, but rather it is the fact that they are forced to perform it and are not free to leave. According to Block's argument, forcing a slave to perform pleasant tasks would be no less monstrous because it equally violates the libertarian non-aggression principle. An Inside Higher Education piece noted that, in response to the story, seventeen faculty members at Block's university publicly called for him to be censured for his "recurring public attacks ... on the civil rights of all." The piece also reported that Reverend Kevin Wildes, the President of Block's university, took the "unusual step" of publicly critiquing his arguments as fallacious. [22]

Pay gap for black people and women

In a 2008 lecture Block called "Injustices in the Politics and Economics of Social Justice" presented at the invitation of the Adam Smith Society of the Economics Department of Loyola College, Baltimore Block said "blacks and women" were paid less than whites because they are "less productive". [23]

In the lecture, Block defended his views on women saying among younger and unmarried women, there is virtually no income disparity. When asked by an attendee to explain the difference in productivity between blacks and whites, he said that as an economist he was not qualified to explain the disparity. Block offered two thoughts that might account for the disparity: first, what he called the "politically correct" explanation, or socioeconomic disparities and historical injustices towards blacks; for the second thought, which he calls the "political incorrect", he refers to R. Herrnstein and C. Murray's book "The Bell Curve". [23]

James Gill wrote in the Times-Picayune that the lecture "ignited a furor", resulting in the president of the university, Reverend Brian F. Linnane, apologizing for what was taken as a "sexist and racist outburst", with Gill opining that, "ideas contrary to fashionable preconceptions are always likely to throw academia into a fit". [24]

According to Inside Higher Ed:

Perhaps almost as notable as the president's direct response was the condemnation issued jointly by the college's economics department and the Adam Smith Society ... "It is important to note that the remark was offensive not just because it was racially insensitive, but because it was erroneous and indicated poor-quality scholarship. There is ample scholarly evidence that, after adjusting for productivity-related characteristics (e.g., years of schooling, work experience, union and industry status, etc.) a considerable wage gap remains." [23]

Despite the criticism showing evidence questioning the veracity of his statements, Block said he "regards sensitivity as the enemy of intellectual inquiry and truth." [24] [25] In a December 2008 article, Block wrote that the lessons he had learned from the incident were regarding the need for tenure if one wants to speak out, the wisdom of Murray Rothbard's words that "it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects" while remaining ignorant of economics, and the importance of Ludwig von Mises' motto: "Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it." [26]

Sexual assault

Block asserts that sexual harassment "that takes place between secretary and her boss is not a coercive action like the pinching that takes place in the public sphere." He claims this is the case since the secretary "agrees to all aspects of the job when she agrees to accept the job and especially when she agrees to keep the job". He calls this a "package-deal". He further differentiates this from acts taking place in public areas as they are not privately owned and therefore there can be no agreement to what he calls the "package-deal", and since the pincher isn't the private owner. He argues that "if pinching and sexual molestation are outlawed in private places, this violates the rights of those who voluntarily wish to engage in such practice." Block argues that the proof of the "voluntary" nature of such an act in a private place is that "the person endangered" (the victim woman) "has no claim [right] whatsoever to the private place in question [...] If she continues to patronize or work at a place where she is molested, it can only be voluntary" [27]

Highway privatization

Block says government management of roads and highways is not only inefficient, but also deadly. He argues that "road socialism" causes the deaths of more than 35,000 people in the United States each year. And, although many people blame highway deaths on alcohol, unsafe vehicles, or speeding, Block lays the blame on the government officials who manage the highway system. "It may well be that speed and alcohol are deleterious to safe driving; but it is the road manager's task to ascertain that the proper standards are maintained with regard to these aspects of safety. If unsafe conditions prevail in a private, multistory parking lot, or in a shopping mall, or in the aisles of a department store, the entrepreneur in question is held accountable." [28]

Punishment of government employees

Block has written about punishment of those engaging in "statist, governmental or other gangster activity". He argues there should be "a presumption that all government employees are guilty of a crime against humanity," though he notes that this presumption can be rebutted in many cases, such as that of U.S. Congressman and Mises Institute Senior Fellow Ron Paul. Block examines issues like restitution of land taken through eminent domain and possible retribution against politicians, IRS employees, and others who cooperated in governmental activity. He describes rules by which libertarian "Nuremberg Trials" might operate. [29] [30]

Evictionism (in contrast to abortion)

According to Block's moral theory, the act of abortion must be conceptually separated into the acts of the eviction of the fetus from the womb, and the killing of the fetus. Building on the libertarian stand against trespass and murder, Block supports a right to the first act, but, except in certain circumstances, not the second act. Block believes the woman may legally abort if the fetus is not viable outside the womb, or the woman has announced to the world her abandonment of the right to custody of the fetus, and no one else has "homesteaded" that right by offering to care for the fetus. [31]

He also has written on finding a compromise between those who believe stem cell research is murder and those who favor it. He applies a libertarian theory of private property rights to his premise that even fertilized eggs have human rights and that the relevant issues are competition between researchers and those who wish to adopt the eggs. [32]

Homesteading

Blockean Proviso

Block argues that if property is "necessary" for others to use, to get to unowned property, they have a easement over it and compared it to a person who murders a child without feeding it. [33] He cites the example of a person with donut shaped land who doesn't allow anyone to get to the middle of his land as incompatible with the logic of homesteading. [34]

Picture a bagel (or donut) with a hole in it. Label the hole in the center as 'A,' the bagel itself as 'B' and the surrounding territory, lying outside of the bagel, as 'C.' Suppose that someone, call him Mr. B, homesteads the land depicted by B. Assume away any possibility of tunneling under, or bridging or flying a helicopter over this terrain, B. Mr. B, then, controls area A, without ever having lifted a finger in the direction of homesteading this land, A. Yes, as of now, Mr. B does not own A. But, under our assumptions, he can homestead this territory whenever he wants to do so. Mr. B and [sic] gained an untoward advantage, vis-à-vis all other potential homesteaders of A, who are now residing in territory C, and cannot reach A, without trespassing on B, Mr. B's property. This, I claim, is incompatible with the logic of homesteading.

Stephan Kinsella, who disagreed with Block, coined the term "The Blockean Proviso" after The Lockean Proviso. It has since been called the Blockean or Blockian proviso. [35]

Negative homesteading

Block has theorized on whether a person acting in self-defense can harm a human shield or hostage used by an aggressor. Block holds this is legitimate because the human shield is the first victim of the aggressor and, as such, cannot be allowed to pass on their misery to the defending person, the intended second victim of the aggressor. Block calls this "negative homesteading theory". [36] [37]

Foreign policy

Block supports a non-interventionist foreign policy. [38] On LewRockwell.com , he criticized Randy Barnett's Wall Street Journal editorial on presidential candidate Ron Paul and on foreign policy. [39]

Animal rights

Block believes that the libertarian non-aggression principle does not apply to animals and that the right of human owners to kill, torture, or otherwise abuse animals may be an unavoidable corollary of libertarian premises. He articulated this position in a 2017 debate on animal rights, maintaining that groups must be able to petition for rights and respect the rights of others in order to qualify for rights themselves. [40] [ better source needed ]

Publications

As author

As editor

Notes

  1. "About Walter Block". Archived from the original on December 29, 2016. Retrieved March 27, 2014.
  2. "Mises Institute Faculty Listing". Archived from the original on July 28, 2013. Retrieved July 31, 2013.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Block, Walter (December 4, 2002). "On Autobiography". LewRockwell.com. Archived from the original on June 18, 2015.
  4. Chana, Jas (August 20, 2015). "Straight Outta Brooklyn, by Way of Vermont: The Bernie Sanders Story". The Tablet. Archived from the original on February 12, 2016. Retrieved February 12, 2016. At James Madison, Bernie Sanders was a talented athlete and a natural leader. Block recalled how the high school's freshmen would look up to him during their senior year track sessions.
  5. 1 2 "Walter Block" (PDF). WalterBlock.com (Curriculum vitae). p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2019.
  6. Block, Walter (December 28, 2007). "Open Letter to Ron Paul by Walter Block". LewRockwell.com.
  7. "Radical Economics: An Interview with Walter Block". Austrian Economics Newsletter. Summer 1999. Archived from the original on September 14, 2014.
  8. VoluntaryVirtues0com (July 5, 2013). Walter Block on Triple V Roads, Ron Paul, Property Rights, Abortion, Venus Project, FSP, more. YouTube. Retrieved April 7, 2014.[ permanent dead link ]
  9. 1 2 3 4 "Walter Block faculty page". Loyola University New Orleans . Archived from the original on November 23, 2013. Retrieved July 31, 2013.
  10. "Walter Block". Ludwig von Mises Institute website. Archived from the original on October 8, 2014.
  11. "Walter Block" (PDF) (Curriculum vitae). sections on Articles Published in Refereed Journals and Reference Works. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2019.
  12. Public Choice Archived January 7, 2020, at the Wayback Machine , publication of Springer Science+Business Media.
  13. Block, Walter. "Psychology Today Blog Index" . Retrieved August 4, 2013.
  14. TomWoodsTV (January 12, 2017). Major Milestone: Libertarian Walter Block Looks Back on 500 Peer-Reviewed Articles. Archived from the original on September 26, 2022. Retrieved September 26, 2022 via YouTube.
  15. "Walter Block" (PDF). WalterBlock.com (Curriculum vitae). p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2019.
  16. Murphy, Robert P. (2006). "A Note on Walter Block's Defending the Undefendable". American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 65 (2): 463–467. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00459.x. ISSN   1536-7150. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved April 14, 2021. Walter Block's amusing and popular Defending the Undefendable offers an intentionally shocking collection of short chapters, each praising a different "rogue" of modern society
  17. Carden, Art (August 22, 2020). "Happy Birthday to Libertarian Firebrand Walter Block". independent.org. Oakland, California: Independent Institute. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved April 14, 2021. As befits someone who is probably best known for a book titled Defending the Undefendable, Block is no stranger to controversy.
  18. Stossel, John (August 25, 2011). "Almost Everything We're Taught Is Wrong, Using economics to explode fallacies". Reason . Archived from the original on July 2, 2017.
  19. Block, Walter (Spring 2003). "Towards a Libertarian Theory of Inalienability: A Critique of Rothbard, Barnett, Smith, Kinsella, Gordon, and Epstein" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies . 17 (2): 44, 46, 82. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 2, 2014.
  20. Tanenhaus, Sam; Ruttenberg, Jim (January 25, 2014). "Rand Paul's Mixed Inheritance". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 16, 2020.
  21. Block, Walter (January 30, 2014). "Reply to the Scurrilous, Libelous, Venomous, Scandalous New York Times Smear Campaign". LewRockwell.com. Archived from the original on July 3, 2020.
  22. Jaschik, Scott (February 24, 2014). "Professor Who Defends Segregation". Inside Higher Education. Archived from the original on April 7, 2020.
  23. 1 2 3 Guess, Andy (November 19, 2008). "When Austrian Economics and Jesuit Theology Don't Mix". Inside Higher Education . Archived from the original on December 20, 2008.
  24. 1 2 Gill, James (November 26, 2008). "Loyola economics chair Walter Block ignites furor for asserting that women, blacks less productive in workplace". Times-Picayune . Archived from the original on September 23, 2013.
  25. Block, Walter (November 18, 2008). "A (Not So) Funny Thing Happened to me in Baltimore". LewRockwell.com . Archived from the original on June 18, 2015.
  26. Block, Walter (December 16, 2008). "Battling Political Correctness". LewRockwell.com . Archived from the original on March 26, 2022.
  27. Block, Walter (September 1975). "On The Women's Liberation, or the Male Chauvinist Pig as Hero". The Libertarian Forum . 8 (9): 5–8, at p. 6. Republished in Rothbard, Murray Newton, ed. (2006). The Complete Libertarian Forum (1969–1984) Volume 1: 1969–1975 (PDF). Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute. pp. 601–604, at p. 602. ISBN   978-1-933550-02-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 11, 2019.
  28. Block, Walter (2009). The Privatization of Roads and Highways: Human and Economic Factors (PDF) (Report). Auburn, AL: The Mises Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 16, 2014.
  29. Block, Walter (2011). "Toward a Libertarian Theory of Guilt and Punishment for the Crime of Statism" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 22: 665–665. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 11, 2013.
  30. Block, Walter (2009). "Libertarian Punishment Theory: Working for, and Donating to, the State". Libertarian Papers. 1 (17): 1–31. Archived from the original on September 14, 2014.
  31. Block, Walter; Whitehead, Roy (2005). "Compromising the uncompromisable: A private property rights approach to resolving the abortion controversy" (PDF). Appalachian Journal of Law. 4 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 16, 2022.
    Wisniewski, Jakub Bozydar (2010). "A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment" (PDF). Libertarian Papers. 2 16. Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 16, 2022.
  32. Block, Walter (2010). "A Libertarian Perspective on the Stem Cell Debate: Compromising the Uncompromisible". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 35: 429–448. PMID   20624766.
    Block, Walter (2010). "Objections to the Libertarian Stem Cell Compromise" (PDF). Libertarian Papers. 2 34. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 5, 2012.
  33. Kinsella, Stephan (September 11, 2007). "The Blockean Proviso". Mises Wire. Archived from the original on March 14, 2021. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
  34. Dominiak, Lukasz (2017). "The Blockian Proviso and Rationality of Property Rights" (PDF). Libertarian Papers.
  35. Block, Walter E.; Butt, Joseph A. (2016). "Forestalling, Positive Obligations and the Lockean and Blockean Provisos: Rejoinder to Stephan Kinsella*" (PDF). Ekonomia. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 7, 2021. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
  36. Jakobsson, Carl (2010). "The Negative Homesteading Theory: Rejoinder to Walter Block on Human Body Shields" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 22 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2013.
  37. Block, Walter (2011). "The Human Body Shield" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 22: 625–630. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2013.
  38. "Toward a Libertarian Society". June 6, 2014. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2017.
  39. "Libertarianism vs. War". LewRockwell. Archived from the original on April 7, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2017.
  40. Lucy Steigerwald (August 21, 2017). Animal Rights?: A Debate Between Walter Block and Thomas Raskin. Archived from the original on December 21, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2018.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarcho-capitalism</span> Political philosophy and economic theory

Anarcho-capitalism is an anti-statist, libertarian political philosophy and economic theory that seeks to abolish centralized states in favor of stateless societies with systems of private property enforced by private agencies, based on concepts such as the non-aggression principle, free markets and self-ownership. An anarcho-capitalist philosophy extends the concept of ownership to include control of private property as part of the self, and, in some cases, control of other people as private property. In the absence of statute, anarcho-capitalists hold that society tends to contractually self-regulate and civilize through participation in the free market, which they describe as a voluntary society involving the voluntary exchange of goods and services. In a theoretical anarcho-capitalist society a system of private property would still exist, and would be enforced by private defense agencies and/or insurance companies that were selected by property owners, whose ownership rights or claims would be enforced by private defence agencies and/or insurance companies. These agencies or companies would operate competitively in a market and fulfill the roles of courts and the police, similar to a state apparatus. Some anarcho-capitalist authors have argued that slavery is compatible with anarcho-capitalist ideals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murray Rothbard</span> American economist (1926–1995)

Murray Newton Rothbard was an American economist of the Austrian School, economic historian, political theorist, and activist. Rothbard was a central figure in the 20th-century American libertarian movement, particularly its right-wing strands, and was a founder and leading theoretician of anarcho-capitalism. He wrote over twenty books on political theory, history, economics, and other subjects.

The libertarian perspective on immigration is often regarded as one of the core concepts of libertarian theory and philosophy. There is considerable disagreement among libertarians as to what stance towards immigration best accords with libertarian principles. Some hold that restrictions on immigration are an infringement of the rights of immigrants and other property owners and constitute a threat to individual liberty. Others maintain that open borders amount to a policy of forced integration on the part of the state, and that protecting the rights of property holders requires that present governments adopt much more discriminatory policies on who is allowed to enter a country.

Libertarians promote individual liberty and seek to minimize the role of the state. The abortion debate is mainly within right-libertarianism between cultural liberals and social conservatives as left-libertarians generally see it as a settled issue regarding individual rights, as they support legal access to abortion as part of what they consider to be a woman's right to control her body and its functions. Religious right and intellectual conservatives have attacked such libertarians for supporting abortion rights, especially after the demise of the Soviet Union led to a greater divide in the conservative movement between libertarians and social conservatives. Libertarian conservatives claim libertarian principles such as the non-aggression principle (NAP) apply to human beings from conception and that the universal right to life applies to fetuses in the womb. Thus, some of those individuals express opposition to legal abortion. According to a 2013 survey, 5.7/10 of American Libertarians oppose making it more difficult for a woman to get an abortion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans-Hermann Hoppe</span> German-American anarcho-capitalist academic (born 1949)

Hans-Hermann Hoppe is a German-American academic associated with Austrian School economics, anarcho-capitalism, right-wing libertarianism, and opposition to democracy. He is professor emeritus of economics at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), senior fellow of the Mises Institute think tank, and the founder and president of the Property and Freedom Society.

The Ludwig von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics, or Mises Institute, is a nonprofit think tank headquartered in Auburn, Alabama, that is a center for Austrian economics, right-wing libertarian thought and the paleolibertarian and anarcho-capitalist movements in the United States. It is named after the economist Ludwig von Mises (1881–1973) and promotes the Misesian version of heterodox Austrian economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lew Rockwell</span> American libertarian author, editor, and political consultant (born 1944)

Llewellyn Harrison Rockwell Jr. is an American author, editor, and political consultant. A libertarian and a self-professed anarcho-capitalist, he founded and is the chairman of the Mises Institute, a non-profit promoting the Austrian School of economics.

Libertarian perspectives on foreign intervention started as a reaction to the Cold War mentality of military interventionism promoted by American conservatives, including William F. Buckley Jr., who supplanted Old Right non-interventionism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paleolibertarianism</span> Right-wing political activism strategy

Paleolibertarianism is a right-libertarian political activism strategy aimed at uniting libertarians and paleoconservatives. It was developed by American anarcho-capitalist theorists Murray Rothbard and Lew Rockwell in the American political context after the end of the Cold War. From 1989 to 1995, they sought to communicate libertarian notions of opposition to government intervention by using messages accessible to the working class and middle class people of the time. They combined libertarian free market views with the cultural conservatism of paleoconservatism, while also opposing protectionism. The strategy also embraced the paleoconservative reverence for tradition and religion. This approach, usually identified as right-wing populism, was intended to radicalize citizens against the state. The name they chose for this style of activism evoked the roots of modern libertarianism, hence the prefix paleo. That founding movement was American classical liberalism, which shared the anti-war and anti-New Deal sentiments of the Old Right in the first half of the 20th century. Paleolibertarianism is generally seen as a right-wing ideology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-aggression principle</span> Core concept in libertarianism in the United States

The Non-Aggression Principle (NAP), also called the Non-Aggression Axiom, the non-coercion principle, the non-initiation of force and the zero aggression principle, is a concept in which "aggression" – defined as initiating or threatening any forceful interference with either an individual or their property, or agreements (contracts) – is illegitimate and should be prohibited. Interpretations of the NAP vary, particularly concerning issues like intellectual property, force, and abortion.

Ralph Raico was an American libertarian historian of European liberalism and a professor of history at Buffalo State College.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Libertarianism in the United States</span> Origin, history and development of libertarianism in the United States

In the United States, libertarianism is a political philosophy promoting individual liberty. According to common meanings of conservatism and liberalism in the United States, libertarianism has been described as conservative on economic issues and liberal on personal freedom, often associated with a foreign policy of non-interventionism. Broadly, there are four principal traditions within libertarianism, namely the libertarianism that developed in the mid-20th century out of the revival tradition of classical liberalism in the United States after liberalism associated with the New Deal; the libertarianism developed in the 1950s by anarcho-capitalist author Murray Rothbard, who based it on the anti-New Deal Old Right and 19th-century libertarianism and American individualist anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner while rejecting the labor theory of value in favor of Austrian School economics and the subjective theory of value; the libertarianism developed in the 1970s by Robert Nozick and founded in American and European classical liberal traditions; and the libertarianism associated with the Libertarian Party, which was founded in 1971, including politicians such as David Nolan and Ron Paul.

Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism, or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political philosophy that supports capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of natural resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property and capital from left-libertarianism, a variant of libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an anti-authoritarian approach to property and income. In contrast to socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports free-market capitalism. Like most forms of libertarianism, it supports civil liberties, especially natural law, negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a significant transformation of the modern welfare state. Practitioners of Right-libertarianism usually do not self-describe by that term and often object to it.

<i>The Libertarian Forum</i> Defunct anarcho-capitalist magazine

The Libertarian Forum was an anarcho-capitalist magazine published about twice a month from 1969 to 1984. Its editor and chief author was Murray Rothbard; initially, Karl Hess also served as Washington editor. Currently all the issues are available in the book compilation The Complete Libertarian Forum 1969–1984.

<i>For a New Liberty</i> 1973 book by Murray Rothbard

For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto is a book by American economist and historian Murray Rothbard, in which the author promotes anarcho-capitalism. The work has been credited as an influence on modern libertarian thought and on part of the New Right.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Libertarian conservatism</span> Ideology combining conservatism with libertarianism

Libertarian conservatism, also referred to as conservative libertarianism and conservatarianism, is a political and social philosophy that combines conservatism and libertarianism, representing the libertarian wing of conservatism and vice versa.

This is a bibliography of books and other works written by U.S. Congressman Ron Paul.

<i>Defending the Undefendable</i> 1976 book by Walter Block

Defending the Undefendable is a 1976 book by American economist Walter Block. It has been translated into ten foreign languages. The book advances the thesis that various people are stigmatized for engaging in acts that are often illegal or disreputable yet do not involve violence or violation of property. Block further proposes these people may in fact benefit society. Each chapter examines a different type of person, including prostitutes, blackmailers, misers and litterers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Gordon (philosopher)</span> American libertarian philosopher and intellectual historian

David Gordon is an American libertarian philosopher and intellectual historian influenced by Murray Rothbard's views of economics. He is a senior fellow of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, a libertarian think tank, and is the editor of The Mises Review.

The Libertarian Party in the United States is composed of various factions, sometimes described as left and right, although many libertarians reject use of these terms to describe the political philosophy.