Glyptagnostus reticulatus

Last updated

Glyptagnostus reticulatus
Temporal range: Paibian
Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus - cephalon (Allison R. Palmer, 1962).png
Glyptagnostus reticulatus cephalon
Glyptagnostus reticulatus pygidium.jpg
Glyptagnostus reticulatus pygidium
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class:† Trilobita (?)
Order:† Agnostida
Family:† Glyptagnostidae
Genus:† Glyptagnostus
Species:
†G. reticulatus
Binomial name
†Glyptagnostus reticulatus
(Angelin, 1851)
Synonyms
  • Agnostus nodosusBelt, 1867
  • Agnostus reticulatusAngelin, 1851
  • Glyptagnostus angeliniResser, 1938
  • Glyptagnostus toerumaWhitehouse, 1936
  • Pseudagnostus reticulatus(Angelin, 1851)
  • Ptychagnostus reticulatus(Angelin, 1851)

Glyptagnostus reticulatus is a species of agnostid trilobite belonging to the genus Glyptagnostus . It existed during the Paibian Age (497 million years ago) of the Cambrian. It has a cosmopolitan distribution and is an important index fossil in biostratigraphy. It was characterized by an unusual net-like pattern of furrows on both the cephalon and the pygidium.

Contents

Description

Like all members of the suborder Agnostida, Glyptagnostus reticulatus is completely blind and only has two thoracic segments. The cephalon and pygidium are more or less the same size and shape (isopygous). [1] The glabella of the cephalon has two lobes. The front lobe is roughly squarish in shape, while the rear lobe is elongated and split along the middle. The cephalon has a narrow well-defined border. The pygidium has a long tapering central axis which can be divided into three lobes. The axis is connected to the rear margin by a central furrow. At both sides of the axis are a row of four or more pits. The border of the pygidium is also well-defined, widening towards the back, and with short, backward facing marginal spines. [2]

Like other members of the genus, the cephalon always exhibits a pair of kidney-shaped lumps next to the front glabellar lobe. Both the cephalon and the pygidium are highly ornamented with radiating patterns of furrows, resembling a net. The patterns are not perfectly bilaterally symmetrical and can vary between different individuals in the species. They can be distinguished from other members of the genus by irregular patterns of cross furrows that connect the radial furrows. The third pygidial axial lobe is longer than half the length of the second pygidial axial lobe. [2]

Three subspecies were previously proposed for Glyptagnostus reticulatus: [2]

Two of the subspecies, Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus and Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini, were proposed by the American paleontologist Allison R. Palmer in 1962. The third subspecies, Glyptagnostus reticulatus nodulosus was proposed by the Swedish paleontologist Anton Hilmar Westergård in 1947, but it has generally not been accepted by other authors. [2]

Slab showing infraspecific variation within Glyptagnostus reticulatus Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini - Slab showing infra-specific variation, compare reticulation on cephala in upper half of pictures (Allison R. Palmer, 1962).png
Slab showing infraspecific variation within Glyptagnostus reticulatus

According to Palmer, Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini can be distinguished from the nominate subspecies Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus by a third (distal) pygidial axial lobe that is less than 7/10th of the length of the second lobe. Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini also has poorly developed longitudinal furrows outlining the pygidial axis and a variable degree of reticulation. Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus, in contrast, has well-developed longitudinal furrows surrounding the pygidial axis and strongly reticulate patterns (though they are less convex). [2]

The Australian paleontologist James B. Jago, however, questioned Palmer's diagnoses in 1973, noting that the differences in the lengths of the pygidial axial lobes used by Palmer to separate the subspecies, depended on minute differences. He also noted that Palmer acknowledged a complete evolutionary gradation between the two subspecies, and thus doubted the utility of establishing formal diagnoses for both. [3] Nevertheless, Palmer's subspecies remained commonly used throughout much of the 20th century, with Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus being used for strongly reticulate specimens and Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini for those with weaker reticulation. [4]

In 2000, the Chinese paleontologist Shanchi Peng and the American paleontologist Richard A. Robison synonymized all subspecies previously described as merely morphotypes, with individuals exhibiting weaker reticulation stratigraphically younger than individuals with stronger reticulation. [4]

Taxonomy

A complete specimen of Glyptagnostus reticulatus Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini - holotype (Allison R. Palmer, 1962).png
A complete specimen of Glyptagnostus reticulatus

Glyptagnostus reticulatus was first described by the Swedish paleontologist Nils Peter Angelin in 1851 as Agnostus reticulatus. [5] It became the type species of the genus Glyptagnostus under the synonym Glyptagnostus toeruma, established by the Australian geologist Frederick William Whitehouse in 1936. Westergård recognized G. toeruma as a synonym in 1947. As such, Agnostus reticulatus is now accepted under the combination Glyptagnostus reticulatus. [2] [6]

The species was also originally considered as the type species of the genus Ptychagnostus , established by the German paleontologist Otto Jaekel in his paper Über die Agnostiden (1909). But because of a printing error, Agnostus punctuosus was instead made to appear as if it was the intended type species. The mistake was discovered, but by then the usage of the genera had already stabilized. The genus Ptychagnostus was retained as if Jaekel described it with Agnostus punctuosus as the type species, while Glyptagnostus remains valid. [7]

Glyptagnostus reticulatus is classified under the genus Glyptagnostus of the family Glyptagnostidae. [8] The generic name is derived from Ancient Greek γλυπτός (glyptos, 'engraved') and άγνωστος (ágnostos, "unknown"). The specific name is derived from Latin reticulatus ('net-like'). [7]

Distribution

Glyptagnostus reticulatus has a cosmopolitan distribution. It has been described from Antarctica, Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, Kazakhstan, Norway, Russia, South Korea, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. [4]

Biostratigraphy

Glyptagnostus reticulatus is used in biostratigraphy as an index fossil. Its first appearance at the GSSP section of the Huaqiao Formation in Hunan, China is defined as the beginning of the Paibian Age (around 497 million years ago) and of the Furongian Epoch (Upper Cambrian). [4]

Related Research Articles

<i>Agnostus</i> Extinct genus of trilobites

Agnostus is a genus of agnostid trilobites, belonging to the family Agnostidae, that lived during the late Middle Cambrian – early Upper Cambrian. It is the type genus of the family Agnostidae and is subdivided into two subgenera, Agnostus and Homagnostus.

<i>Dikelocephalus</i> Genus of trilobites

Dikelocephalus is a genus of very large trilobites of up to 50 cm (20 in) long, that lived during the last 3 million years of the Cambrian (Sunwaptan). Their fossils are commonly found as disarticulated sclerites, in the upper Mississippi Valley and in Canada (Alberta). The exoskeleton is rounded anteriorly, with the thorax and sides of the tailshield slightly tapering to about 2⁄3× of the width across the base of the spines at the back of the headshield. At the side corners of the pygidium there may be triangular or hooked spines, pointing backwards, while between the spines the posterior margin is at a 30-75° angle with the lateral margin, gently convex or nearly straight. If pygidial spines are lacking, the margin is gradually rounded. The thorax has 12 segments.

<i>Acontheus</i> Extinct genus of trilobites

Acontheus is a genus of trilobites belonging to the Family Corynexochidae, Order Corynexochida, and is geographically widespread having been recorded from middle Cambrian strata in Sweden, Newfoundland, Germany, Siberia, Antarctica, Queensland, China and Wales.

<i>Analox</i>

Analox Rasetti, 1966 is a genus of Eodiscinid trilobites belonging to the family Weymouthiidae Kobayashi T. (1943), Order Agnostida It lived during the Botomian stage. It can easily be distinguished from other trilobites by the two furrows that extend forwards and sidewards from the front of the glabella.

<i>Dicerodiscus</i> Extinct genus of trilobites

Dicerodiscus is an extinct genus from a well-known class of fossil marine arthropods, the trilobites. It lived during the early part of the Botomian stage, in China. Four species have been assigned to it. Dicerodiscus is unique for an eodiscoid in having conspicuous and curved spines that are attached anteriorly, and at their base are directed outward perpendicular to the midline, before gradually bending further backwards.

<i>Meteoraspis</i>

Meteoraspis is an extinct genus of ptychopariid trilobites of the family Tricrepicephalidae. The various species lived from 501 to 497 million years ago during the Dresbachian faunal stage of the late Cambrian Period. Fossils of Meteoraspis are characteristic of Late Cambrian strata in North America, though they are found in Late Cambrian strata elsewhere in the world, such as M. nevensis from Victoria Land, Antarctica.

<i>Ptychagnostus</i> Extinct genus of trilobites

Ptychagnostus is a member of the agnostida that lived during the Cambrian period. Ptychagnostidae generally do not exceed one centimetre in length. Their remains are rarely found in empty tubes of the polychaete worm Selkirkia. The genus probably ranged throughout the water column. It has two glabellar lobes, and three pygidial lobes.

Acmarhachis is a genus of trilobite in the order Agnostida, which lived in what are now Australia, Canada, China (Anhui), Kazakhstan, Russia (Kharaulakh), and the US. It was described by Resser in 1938, and the type species is Acmarhachis typicalis.

Lotagnostus is a genus of very small trilobites in the order Agnostida, which lived on the outer continental shelves worldwide, during the late Upper Cambrian. It was described by Whitehouse in 1936, and the type species is Lotagnostus trisectus, which was originally described as a species of Agnostus by Salter in 1864.

<i>Phalagnostus</i>

Phalagnostus is a genus of small trilobites, in the order Agnostida. It lived during the Middle Cambrian, in what are now Canada, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, England, France, the Russian Federation, Wales, Sweden, and possibly the United States (Vermont). The headshield is almost entirely effaced and wider than the tailshield. The pygidium is also very effaced, but the ovate pygidial axis is well defined and a border furrow is also present.

<i>Odontochile</i> Genus of trilobites

Odontochile is a genus of trilobites in the order Phacopida, family Dalmanitidae.

<i>Lejopyge laevigata</i> Extinct species of trilobite

Lejopyge laevigata is a species of agnostid trilobite belonging to the genus Lejopyge. It existed during the Guzhangian to the Paibian Age of the Cambrian. It has a cosmopolitan distribution and is an important index fossil in biostratigraphy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ptychagnostidae</span> Extinct family of trilobites

Ptychagnostidae is a family of agnostid trilobites from the 5th Stage to the Paibian Age of the Cambrian. The family includes several important index fossils.

Agnostotes orientalis is a species of agnostid trilobite belonging to the genus Agnostotes. It existed during the Jiangshanian Age of the Cambrian. It is an important index fossil in biostratigraphy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peronopsidae</span>

The Peronopsidae comprise the earliest family of the Agnostina suborder. Species of this family occurred on all paleocontinents. The earliest representatives of this family first occur just before the start of the Middle Cambrian, and the last disappeared just after the start of the Upper Cambrian.

Diplorrhina Hawle and Corda (1847) is a genus of trilobite belonging to Order Agnostida. It lived during the early Middle Cambrian in what are now the Czech Republic and the North Siberian plateau. as in members of the family Peronopsidae it lacks a preglabellar furrow. Both cephalon and pygidium lack spines. It is difficult to distinguish Diplorrhina from many other peronopsids.

<i>Geragnostus</i> Extinct genus of trilobites

Geragnostus is a genus of very small agnostid trilobites whose fossils are found Ordovician-aged marine strata from Eurasia, North America and Argentina.

<i>Toragnostus</i>

Toragnostus is a genus of trilobites restricted to the late Middle Cambrian. Its remains have been found in the United States, Greenland, Denmark, China, Sweden, the Russian Federation, and Kazakhstan. Its headshield and tailshield are almost completely effaced and it has two thorax segments.

<i>Jinghediscus</i>

Jinghediscus Xiang & Zhang, 1985 is a genus of Eodiscinid trilobite belonging to the family Weymouthiidae Kobayashi T. (1943), Order Agnostida It lived during the lower Middle Cambrian, with remains found in China (Xinjiang) and Australia (Queensland).

<i>Tricrepicephalus</i>

Tricrepicephalus is an extinct genus of ptychopariid trilobites of the family Tricrepicephalidae with species of average size. Its species lived from 501 to 497 million years ago during the Dresbachian faunal stage of the late Cambrian Period. Fossils of Tricrepicephalus are widespread in Late Cambrian deposits in North America, but is also known from one location in South America. Tricrepicephalus has an inverted egg-shaped exoskeleton, with three characteristic pits in the fold that parallels the margin of the headshield just in front of the central raised area. The articulating middle part of the body has 12 segments and the tailshield carries two long, tubular, curved pygidial spines that are reminiscent of earwig's pincers that rise backwards from the plain of the body at approximately 30°.

References

  1. ↑ Samuel M. Gon III. "Agnostida Fact Sheet". A Guide to the Orders of Trilobites. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Allison R. Palmer (1962). Glyptagnostus and Associated Trilobites in the United States (PDF). Geological Survey Professional paper 374-F. United States Geological Survey, US Department of the Interior, United States Government Printing Office. p. B27.
  3. ↑ James B. Jago (1973). "Glyptagnostus reticulatus from the Huskisson River, Tasmania" (PDF). Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania. 107: 117–127. doi:10.26749/rstpp.107.117. S2CID   128258620.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Shanchi Peng; Loren E. Babcock; Richard A. Robison; Huanling Lin; Margaret N. Rees & Matthew R. Saltzman (2004). "Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) of the Furongian Series and Paibian Stage (Cambrian)" (PDF). Lethaia. 37 (4): 365–379. doi:10.1080/00241160410002081.
  5. ↑ Nils Peter Angelin (1851–1878). Gustaf Lindström (ed.). Palæontologica Scandinavica, Pars I: Crustacea Formationis Transitionis. Holmiæ. pp. 8, pl.6, f.10.
  6. ↑ "Glyptagnostus reticulatus". Paleobiology Database. Retrieved 20 November 2012.
  7. 1 2 John H. Shergold; John R. Laurie (1991). "Ptychagnostus Jaekel 1909 and Glyptagnostus Whitehouse 1936 Trilobita proposed conservation of accepted usage". Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature. 48 (48): 200–202. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.723 .
  8. ↑ Allison R. Palmer (1968). "Cambrian trilobites of east-central Alaska". Lower paleozoic paleontology and stratigraphy, east-central Alaska. Geological Survey Professional paper 559-B. United States Geological Survey, US Department of the Interior, United States Government Printing Office. p. B27.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.