Gothic and Vandal warfare

Last updated

The Goths, Gepids, Vandals, and Burgundians were East Germanic groups who appear in Roman records in late antiquity. At times these groups warred against or allied with the Roman Empire, the Huns, and various Germanic tribes.

Contents

The size and social composition of their armies remains controversial.

History

In the 3rd century, some Germanic people of the Baltic Sea (associated with the Wielbark culture) followed the Vistula, Bug, and Dnestr rivers and settled among the Dacians, Sarmatians, Bastarnae, and other peoples of the Black Sea steppes. These Germanic people brought their name and language to the Gothic people who emerged in the 3rd century (associated with the Chernyakhov Culture).

At the same time, other Germanic people of the Baltic Sea (associated with the Przeworsk culture) followed other trade routes to the middle-Danubian plains (Vandals) or the Main river (Burgundians).

Horse nomads with bow-armed cavalry armies, including the Sarmatians (or Iazyges, Roxolanni, Taifali, and Alans) had long ruled the plains north of the Danube and the steppes north of the Black Sea (since about 1200 BC). (The Goths and Vandals were mainly farmers with infantry armies). In some areas, the Sarmatians, Taifali, and Alans preserved their dominance until the Huns arrived.

The Gothic people had divided into two or more groups by the end of the 3rd century. These groups lasted from the late 3rd century to the late 4th century. The Thervingi lived between the Danube and the Carpathians west of the Dniester River; the Greuthungi, and possibly other groups, lived east of the Dniester River.

Jordanes, a mid 6th-century historian, describes a large Greuthung kingdom in the late 4th century, but Ammianus Marcellinus, a late 4th-century historian, does not record this. Many modern historians, including Peter Heather and Michael Kulikowski, doubt that it was ever particularly extensive (and suggest one or more smaller kingdoms). [1] [2]

Troop types

Gothic armies were primarily composed of heavy infantry equipped with a shield, spatha or scramasax and the occasional francisca and pike formed in wedge formation, with a supporting heavy cavalry force equipped with lance and sword. [3] Although Goths were the first of the Germanic tribes to place more honour in fighting on horse than on foot, equipping cavalrymen was expensive and infantry remained the larger force. [4] Visigoths had fewer cavalry, Ostrogoths had more cavalry than the Roman army, while Vandals were dominated by cavalry. [5]

Cavalry mainly took the form of heavy, close combat cavalry armed with sword and lance. [4] Goths and likely Vandals as well favoured a long heavy lance of Sarmatian origin, the contus, which stood at 3.74m long. The Goths also recruited mounted archers from the Alans and Sarmatians, and light sword cavalry from the Heruli and Taifali, although all of these also fielded lancers. [6] For a Gothic or Vandal nobleman the most common form of armour was a mail shirt, often reaching down to the knees, and an iron or steel helmet, often in a Roman Ridge helm style. Some of the wealthiest warriors may have a worn a lamellar cuirass over mail, and splinted greaves and vambraces on the forearms and forelegs.

Realms in the Roman Empire

This Gothic society faced internal strife and Hunnish attacks in the late 4th century. As a result, several groups sought refuge in the Roman Empire; two of the more successful groups, the Thervings and Greuthungs, absorbed smaller groups and gained independence within the Roman Empire. Another group, the Crimean Goths, survived on the Black Sea. The Vandals and Burgundians shared similar histories.

The Visigothic and Burgundian kingdoms in Gaul fell to Clovis' Frankish invasions in the early 6th century; [7] the Vandal kingdom in north Africa and the Ostrogothic kingdom in Italy and Illyria fell to Justinian I's Byzantine invasions by the mid 6th century. [8] The Visigothic kingdom in Hispania survived (despite losing most of their old Gallic territory) until the Islamic conquest of Hispania in the early 8th century.

Gothic society and forces in the 3rd and 4th centuries

Roman relief panel on the Ludovisi Battle sarcophagus depicting a battle between Goths and Romans, circa 260. 10 2023 - Palazzo Altemps, Roma, Lazio, 00186, Italia - Sarcofago Grande Ludovisi (Grande Ludovisi sarcophagus) - Arte Romana - Photo Paolo Villa FO232047 ombre gimp bis.jpg
Roman relief panel on the Ludovisi Battle sarcophagus depicting a battle between Goths and Romans, circa 260.

The Gothic tribes did not have long-term standing armies but relied on short-term levies or volunteers. Most would return to their farms after some time. Most came on foot and fought as infantry, though some brought horses and fought as cavalry. Like their Roman opponents, most soldiers had thrusting spears, throwing spears, and shields, though swords and bows were also used. Unlike their Roman opponents, few could afford metal armor. [9] [10]

Major wars:
Notable battles:

Difference of scale

The 3rd- and 4th-century Gothic tribes could not match the population or extent of the Roman Empire. The 4th-century Thervingi settled over about 100,000 km2 between the Carpathian mountains, Olt river, Danube river, and Pruth river. (The Eastern Roman Empire held about 1,500,000 km2 in round numbers). The destruction of one Gothic army would leave its tribe vulnerable to Roman attacks; the destruction of one Roman army could be countered by other Roman armies moving into the war zone (as happened after Adrianople). Therefore, 3rd- and 4th-century Gothic armies could not take as many risks as Roman armies could.

Defending Gothic settlements (on the steppe)

The Gothic people generally settled in unwalled farming settlements along the main rivers. These settlements were vulnerable to Roman, Hunnish, or other attacks, even by small raiding parties. [42]

Valens and the Roman army invaded Therving lands in 367 and 369. Athanaric and his supporters avoided battle; his army abandoned the Danubian plains and retreated into the Carpathian Mountains. The Goths could not defeat the Romans in battle and defend their homes. [25] [43]

Alan and Hunnic raiders attacked various Gothic lands in the 370s; they attacked Therving lands c. 375. Athanaric and his supporters sought battle; the main Gothic army assembled on the Dnestr river, with forward units scouted 30 km ahead. The Hunnic raiders avoided the scouts and attacked the main army at night. [27]

Attacking Roman territory (by land)

The Roman Empire fortified most of its cities and frontier garrisons in the 3rd and 4th centuries. Fortified settlements were relatively safe from Gothic attacks. [44]

Gothic attackers could choose unfortified targets; these included many cities in the 3rd century, but were generally restricted to smaller towns and villae by the 4th century, as more cities were fortified. Alternatively, they could attack fortified targets, relying on surprise, on treachery, or on siege warfare.

Attacking Roman territory (by sea)

In the 3rd century, several Gothic campaigns went by sea. In the 4th century, few, if any, Gothic campaigns went by sea.

Revolts

As soon as large Gothic groups settled on Roman territory, they faced military conflicts with the Roman government (as in the Gothic War (376–382)).

Gothic and Vandal forces in the Late Roman army

The Late Roman army (or East Roman army for the east) often recruited non-Roman soldiers into regular military units, as well as separate allied contingents (of laeti and foederati ). Most soldiers were probably Romans, many were probably non-Roman. [45]

Notable battles:

Germanic forces in the Hunnic army

By the early 5th century, Hunnic elites established their hegemony in Eastern and Central Europe by subduing or dislodging the local elites. The Hunnic rulers had thus an empire at their disposal with the resources of subject people who were required to supply additional forces for their ongoing raids and conquests. The most memorable of their rulers became Attila, who eventually challenged the Roman Empire for supremacy.

After the death of Attila, one of his subject rulers, Ardaric, waged a successful civil war against the heirs of Attila, helping several tribes to break apart and regain their independence.

Notable battles:

Visigothic armies (396–507)

During the Gothic revolt of 376, a mixed Gothic group settled in Moesia. By the 390s Alaric had become the client king of the Visigoths under the Roman Empire.

Between 395 and 418, Alaric, Athawulf, and their immediate successors fought several campaigns, seeking offices for themselves and support for their followers. They transferred their base of operations from the eastern Balkans (395) to the western Balkans (397), Italy (408), and Aquitaine (c. 415).

These successive movements may have divided the army from much of its population base.

Notable battles:

Visigothic armies (507–711)

Notable battles:

Vandal armies (406–534)

Notable battles:

Ostrogothic armies (489–553)

Ostrogothic armies may have had the same organizational structure (with separate field armies and frontier armies) as contemporary Byzantine armies.

Ostrogothic Italy, like the Late Roman Empire, fortified its cities and military bases. [46]

The Italian-Ostrogothic army, like the Late Roman and Byzantine army, could transport food and other military supplies from secure areas to war zones. This allowed the Ostrogothic army to assemble more troops in one place (than earlier Gothic armies) without consuming as much of the local food supply. [47]

Notable battles:

Weapons and armor

There is little direct evidence for Gothic military equipment. There is more evidence for Vandal, Roman, and West Germanic military equipment, which provides the base for inferences about Gothic military equipment.

Germanic and Roman weapons and armor

Generally speaking, there was little difference between well-armed Germanic and Roman soldiers; furthermore, many Germanic soldiers served in the Roman forces. The Roman army was better able to equip its soldiers than the Germanic armies.

Late Roman representational evidence, including propaganda monuments, gravestones, tombs, and the Exodus fresco, often shows Late Roman soldiers with one or two spears; one tombstone shows a soldier with five shorter javelins. [48] [49] Archaeological evidence, from Roman burials and Scandinavian bog-deposits, shows similar spearheads, though the shafts are rarely preserved. [50] [51]

Aside from the traditional mail and scale armour of Roman armies, it also known from archaeological finds that the Goths and Vandals commonly used lamellar armour. Constructed of overlapping metal plates laced together, lamellar was more rigid than mail or scale armour and offered considerably greater protection against blunt force trauma from weapons such as maces or axes, commonly used by heavy cavalry of the time.

Late Roman representational evidence sometimes still shows Roman swords. [52] [53] Archaeological evidence shows that the gladius has disappeared; various short semispathae supplement the older pugiones [54] [55] while medium-long spathae replace the medium-short gladii. [52] [56] These have the same straight double-edged blades as older Roman swords. [57] [58]

Representational evidence and recovered laths, as well as arrowheads and bracers, show Roman use of composite bows. [59] [60]

Representational evidence, recovered bosses, and some complete shields from Dara, show that most Roman infantry and some Roman cavalry carried shields. [61] [62]

Although the representational evidence, including gravestones and tombs, usually shows soldiers without armor, the archaeological evidence includes remains of scale armor, mail armor, and helmets. [63] [64]

Experimental evidence

Modern blacksmiths, reenactors, and experimental archaeologists can duplicate Roman Age weapons and armor with Roman Age technology.

Basic spearheads (including javelinheads) take about three hours of forging time, while swords can take about 37 hours without pattern welding, or about 110 hours with pattern welding (divided over several days or weeks of labor). [65]

Mail armor takes well over 600 hours of forging time. [66]

Military terminology

Via Wulfila's bible translation we do know 4th-century Gothic military terms he used to describe the 1st-century Roman army. These terms reflect the Gothic military organization that grew from its Germanic roots under Roman and Central Asian (Hunnic) influence.

Individuals

Units (by size)

Weapons

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Heather, Peter, 1998, The Goths, Blackwell, Malden, pp. 53–55.
  2. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 54–56, 111–112.
  3. ↑ Gabriel, Richard A. (2007). The Ancient World Volume 1 of Soldiers' lives through history. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 268–269. ISBN   978-0313333484.
  4. 1 2 Richard A. Gabriel (2002). The Great Armies of Antiquity. ABC-CLIO. pp. 274–275. ISBN   9780313012693.
  5. ↑ Kelly DeVries, Robert D. Smith (2007). Medieval Weapons An Illustrated History of Their Impact. ABC-CLIO. p. 26. ISBN   9781851095315.
  6. ↑ Ilkka Syvänne (2015). A Military History of Late Rome 284 to 361. Pen & Sword Military. pp. 78–79. ISBN   9781848848559.
  7. ↑ Heather, Peter, 1998, The Goths, pp. 210–215 & 262.
  8. ↑ Heather, Peter, 1998, The Goths, pp. 259–276.
  9. ↑ Elton, Hugh, Warfare in Roman Europe, AD 350–425, pp. 57–59.
  10. ↑ Todd, Malcolm, The Early Germans, pp. 36–37.
  11. 1 2 3 Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, p. 18.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Zosimus, Historia Nova, book 1.
  13. ↑ Philostorgius, Church History, book 2, chapter 5.
  14. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, pp. 18–19.
  15. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, pp. 19–20.
  16. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, p. 20.
  17. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, pp. 20–21.
  18. ↑ Socrates Scholasticus, Church History, book 1, chapter 18.
  19. ↑ Sozomen, Church History, book 1, chapter 8 & book 2, chapter 34.
  20. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, pp. 83–84.
  21. ↑ Zosimus, Historia Nova, book 3.
  22. ↑ Ammianus Marcellinus, Historiae, book 26, chapters 6–10.
  23. 1 2 3 4 Zosimus, Historia Nova, book 4.
  24. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, pp. 114–115.
  25. 1 2 Ammianus Marcellinus, Historiae, book 27, chapter 5.
  26. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, pp. 115–116.
  27. 1 2 3 Ammianus Marcellinus, Historiae, book 31, chapter 3.
  28. 1 2 3 Philostorgius, Church History, book 9, chapter 17.
  29. 1 2 3 Sozomen, Church History, book 6, chapter 37.
  30. 1 2 Heather, Peter, 1998, Goths, pp. 98–104.
  31. 1 2 Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, pp. 124–128.
  32. ↑ Ammianus Marcellinus, Historiae, book 31, chapters 5–16.
  33. ↑ Socrates Scholasticus, Church History, book 4, chapters 34–38 & book 5, chapter 1.
  34. ↑ Sozomen, Church History, book 6, chapters 37 & 40.
  35. ↑ Heather, Peter, 1998, Goths, pp. 130–138.
  36. ↑ Kulikowski, Michael, 2007, Rome's Gothic Wars, pp. 130–153.
  37. ↑ Socrates Scholasticus, Church History, book 4, chapter 33. (Socrates puts this before 376).
  38. ↑ Zosimus, Historia Nova, book 4. (Zosimus puts this after 376).
  39. ↑ Zosimus, Historia Nova, book 4. (Zosimus puts this before 383)
  40. ↑ Philostorgius, Church History, book 10, chapter 6.
  41. ↑ Heather, Peter, 1998, Goths, pp. 103, 128 & 167
  42. ↑ Heather, Peter & Matthews, John, The Goths in the Fourth Century, pp. 56–59.
  43. ↑ Elton, Hugh, Warfare in Roman Europe, AD 350–425, p 221-227
  44. ↑ Elton, Hugh, Warfare in Roman Europe, AD 350–425, pp. 155–174.
  45. ↑ Elton, Hugh, 1996, Warfare in Roman Europe, pp. 145–152. [Elton argues from the proportion of Roman names to non-Roman names from 350 to 476]
  46. ↑ Cassiodorus, Variae, book 1, number 17 & book 3, number 44.
  47. ↑ Cassiodorus, Variae, book 3, number 41.
  48. ↑ Stephenson, I.P., 2001, Roman Infantry Equipment, pp. 54–58.
  49. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 151–152, 175 & 200–202.
  50. ↑ Stephenson, I.P., 2001, Roman Infantry Equipment, pp. 52–60.
  51. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 151 & 200–202.
  52. 1 2 Stephenson, I.P., 2001, Roman Infantry Equipment, pp. 61–63.
  53. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 154–163 & 202–205.
  54. ↑ Stephenson, I.P., 2001, Roman Infantry Equipment, pp. 76–80.
  55. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 154, 164 & 202.
  56. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 154–157 & 202–205.
  57. ↑ Stephenson, I.P., 2001, Roman Infantry Equipment, pp. 61–80.
  58. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 154–164 & 202–205.
  59. ↑ Stephenson, I.P., 2001, Roman Infantry Equipment, pp. 81–88.
  60. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 164–168 & 205–206.
  61. ↑ Stephenson, I.P., 2001, Roman Infantry Equipment, pp. 15–24.
  62. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 179–182 & 216–218.
  63. ↑ Stephenson, I.P., 2001, Roman Infantry Equipment, pp. 25–51.
  64. ↑ Bishop, M.C. & Coulston, J.C.N., 2006, Roman Military Equipment: From the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, pp. 170–178 & 208–216.
  65. ↑ Sim, David & Ridge, Isabel, 2002, Iron for the Eagles: the Iron Industry of Roman Britain, pp. 90–93.
  66. ↑ Sim, David & Ridge, Isabel, 2002, Iron for the Eagles: the Iron Industry of Roman Britain, pp. 98–103; the authors specify 300 hours to stamp ½ of the links and more time to draw and rivet the other ½ of the links.
  67. ↑ Wright, Joseph, A Primer of the Gothic Language, with Grammar, Notes, and Glossary, p. 217.
  68. ↑ Wright, Joseph, A Primer of the Gothic Language, with Grammar, Notes, and Glossary, p. 220.
  69. ↑ Bennett, William, An Introduction to the Gothic Language, p. 149.
  70. ↑ Wright, Joseph, A Primer of the Gothic Language, with Grammar, Notes, and Glossary, p. 224.
  71. ↑ Bennett, William, An Introduction to the Gothic Language, p. 155.
  72. ↑ Wright, Joseph, A Primer of the Gothic Language, with Grammar, Notes, and Glossary, p. 223.
  73. 1 2 Bennett, William, An Introduction to the Gothic Language, p. 154.
  74. ↑ Wright, Joseph, 1892, A Primer of the Gothic Language, with Grammar, Notes, and Glossary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, p. 223.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alaric I</span> King of the Visigoths from 395 to 410

Alaric I was the first king of the Visigoths, from 395 to 410. He rose to leadership of the Goths who came to occupy Moesia—territory acquired a couple of decades earlier by a combined force of Goths and Alans after the Battle of Adrianople.

The Goths were a Germanic people who played a major role in the fall of the Western Roman Empire and the emergence of medieval Europe. They were first reported by Graeco-Roman authors in the 3rd century AD, living north of the Danube in what is now Ukraine, Moldova and Romania. From here they conducted raids into Roman territory, and large numbers of them joined the Roman military. These early Goths lived in the regions where archaeologists find the Chernyakhov culture, which flourished throughout this region during the 3rd and 4th centuries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ostrogoths</span> 5th–6th-century Germanic ethnic group

The Ostrogoths were a Roman-era Germanic people. In the 5th century, they followed the Visigoths in creating one of the two great Gothic kingdoms within the Western Roman Empire, drawing upon the large Gothic populations who had settled in the Balkans in the 4th century. While the Visigoths had formed under the leadership of Alaric I, the new Ostrogothic political entity which came to rule Italy was formed in the Balkans under Theodoric the Great.

Fritigern was a Thervingian Gothic chieftain whose decisive victory at Adrianople during the Gothic War (376–382) led to favourable terms for the Goths when peace was made with Gratian and Theodosius I in 382.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Adrianople</span> Battle between Eastern Roman Empire and Goths (378)

The Battle of Adrianople also known as Battle of Hadrianopolis was fought between the Eastern Roman army led by the Roman emperor Valens and Gothic rebels led by Fritigern. The battle took place in the vicinity of Adrianople, in the Roman province of Thracia. It ended with an overwhelming victory for the Goths and the death of Emperor Valens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chronology of warfare between the Romans and Germanic peoples</span>

This is a chronology of warfare between the Romans and various Germanic peoples. The nature of these wars varied through time between Roman conquest, Germanic uprisings, later Germanic invasions of the Western Roman Empire that started in the late second century BC, and more. The series of conflicts was one factor which led to the ultimate downfall of the Western Roman Empire in particular and ancient Rome in general in 476.

The limitanei, meaning respectively "the soldiers in frontier districts" or "the soldiers on the riverbank", were an important part of the late Roman and early Byzantine army after the reorganizations of the late 3rd and early 4th centuries. The limitanei, unlike the Comitatenses, palatīni, and Scholae, garrisoned fortifications along the borders of the Roman Empire and were not normally expected to fight far from their fortifications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gothic War (376–382)</span> Conflict between the Roman Empire and various Gothic tribes

The Gothic War of 376–382 was one of several Gothic Wars in Roman history in which the Goths fought against the Roman Empire. This particular conflict included the catastrophic Roman defeat at the Battle of Adrianople, and is commonly seen as a part— albeit a part of disputed significance— of the century of events leading to the Fall of the Western Roman Empire.

<i>Sagittarii</i>

Sagittarii is the Latin term for archers. The term sagittariorum in the title of an infantry or cavalry unit indicated a specialized archer regiment. Regular auxiliary units of foot and horse archers appeared in the Roman army during the early empire. During the Principate roughly two thirds of all archers were on foot and one third were horse archers. Mercenary foot archers already served with the Roman republican army, but horse archers were only introduced after the Romans came into conflict with Eastern armies that relied heavily on mounted archery in the 1st century BC, most notably the Parthians, whose mounted archers were decisive for Crassus's major defeat in the Battle of Carrhae. Since the time of Augustus however, Romans and Italians were also levied as dedicated archers. In the early 1st century BC horse archers were already in widespread use and even supported Roman campaigns against the Germanic tribes in the Central Europe.

The Thervingi, Tervingi, or Teruingi were a Gothic people of the plains north of the Lower Danube and west of the Dniester River in the 3rd and the 4th centuries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greuthungi</span> 3rd-4th–century Gothic tribe of the Pontic steppe

The Greuthungi were a Gothic people who lived on the Pontic steppe between the Dniester and Don rivers in what is now Ukraine, in the 3rd and the 4th centuries. They had close contacts with the Tervingi, another Gothic people, who lived west of the Dniester River. To the east of the Greuthungi, living near the Don river, were the Alans.

Odotheus was a Greuthungi king who in 386 led an incursion into the Roman Empire. He was defeated and killed by the Roman general Promotus. His surviving people settled in Phrygia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taifals</span>

The Taifals or Tayfals were a people group of Germanic or Sarmatian origin, first documented north of the lower Danube in the mid third century AD. They experienced an unsettled and fragmented history, for the most part in association with various Gothic peoples, and alternately fighting against or for the Romans. In the late fourth century some Taifali were settled within the Roman Empire, notably in western Gaul in the modern province of Poitou. They subsequently supplied mounted units to the Roman army and continued to be a significant source of cavalry for early Merovingian armies. By the sixth century their region of western Gaul had acquired a distinct identity as Thifalia.

Michael Kulikowski is an American historian. He is a professor of history and classics and the head of the history department at Pennsylvania State University. Kulikowski specializes in the history of the western Mediterranean world of late antiquity. He is sometimes associated with the Toronto School of History and was a student of Walter Goffart.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early Germanic warfare</span>

Warfare seems to have been a constant in Germanic society, and archaeology indicates this was the case prior to the arrival of the Romans in the 1st century BC. Wars were frequent between and within the individual Germanic peoples. The early Germanic languages preserve various words for "war", and they did not necessarily clearly differentiate between warfare and other forms of violent interaction. The Romans note that for the Germans, robbery in warfare was not shameful. Consequently the motivations for Germanic warfare both against Rome and against other Germanic peoples was the potential to acquire booty.

The palatini were elite units of the Late Roman army mostly attached to the comitatus praesentales, or imperial escort armies. In the elaborate hierarchy of troop-grades, the palatini ranked below the scholares, but above the comitatenses and the limitanei.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Late Roman ridge helmet</span> A helmet born by a Roman soldier

The Late Roman ridge helmet was a type of combat helmet of Late Antiquity used by soldiers of the Late Roman army. It was characterized by the possession of a bowl made up of two or four parts, united by a longitudinal ridge.

Vithimiris was a king of the Greuthungi, ruling for some unspecified time in the area of present-day southern Ukraine. He succeeded to Ermanaric, meaning that he probably reigned in 376. Ammianus Marcellinus, the only known source on him, states that after Ermanaric's death he tried to resist the Alani, who were allied with the Huns, with the help of other Huns hired as mercenaries. He did so "for some time", but eventually, "after many defeats", he died in battle. It is then assumed that he most probably ruled in 376, possibly also in 375.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Huns</span>

The history of the Huns spans the time from before their first secure recorded appearance in Europe around 370 AD to after the disintegration of their empire around 469. The Huns likely entered Western Asia shortly before 370, from Central Asia: they first conquered the Goths and the Alans, pushing a number of tribes to seek refuge within the Roman Empire. In the following years, the Huns conquered most of the Germanic and Scythian tribes outside of the borders of the Roman Empire. They also launched invasions of both the Asian provinces of Rome and the Sasanian Empire in 375. Under Uldin, the first Hunnic ruler named in contemporary sources, the Huns launched a first unsuccessful large-scale raid into the Eastern Roman Empire in Europe in 408. From the 420s, the Huns were led by the brothers Octar and Ruga, who both cooperated with and threatened the Romans. Upon Ruga's death in 435, his nephews Bleda and Attila became the new rulers of the Huns, and launched a successful raid into the Eastern Roman Empire before making peace and securing an annual tribute and trading raids under the Treaty of Margus. Attila appears to have killed his brother, and became sole ruler of the Huns in 445. He would go on to rule for the next eight years, launching a devastating raid on the Eastern Roman Empire in 447, followed by an invasion of Gaul in 451. Attila is traditionally held to have been defeated in Gaul at the Battle of the Catalaunian Fields, however some scholars hold the battle to have been a draw or Hunnic victory. The following year, the Huns invaded Italy and encountered no serious resistance before turning back.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gothic War (248–253)</span> War between the Goths and the Roman Empire (249–253)

The Gothic War of 248–253 took place between the years 248 and 249, as well as in the year 253. Within this war, a series of battles occurred and plundering was carried out by the Goths and their allies in the eastern territory of the Roman Empire, specifically in the Balkans. With the cessation of the payment of tribute previously made by the Roman emperor Philip the Arab to the tribes beyond the Danube, the Goths and their allies, led by King Ostrogotha and his subcommanders Argedo and Gundericus, moved towards the Roman border and began a series of attacks, including against the fortified city of Marcianopolis in Thracia. After these actions, the Goths withdrew with their spoils of war.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.