Human rights in Bhutan

Last updated

Human rights in Bhutan are those outlined in Article 7 of its Constitution. [1] The Royal Government of Bhutan has affirmed its commitment to the "enjoyment of all human rights" as integral to the achievement of 'gross national happiness' (GNH); the unique principle which Bhutan strives for, as opposed to fiscally based measures such as GDP. [2]

Contents

In practice, Bhutan's human rights record has received criticism for the treatment of the Lhotshampa people, many of whom became refugees in Nepal, as well as for failure to uphold freedom of religion. [3]

In 2024, Freedom House rated Bhutan’s human rights at 63 out 100 (partly free). [4]

Rights under the Constitution

Bhutan's Constitution was adopted in 2008 and only after that was it transformed from an absolute monarchy to a democratic Constitutional monarchy. [5] Article 7 of the Constitution establishes numerous rights, including "many of the basic human rights enriched in international conventions", which are said to be "essential for development of the human personality and for the full realization of the human potential." [6] "Fundamental rights" established in Article 7 include:

Other classes of rights protected are labor rights, [15] voting rights, [16] and intellectual property rights. [17] The Constitution also prohibits torture and "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment", including capital punishment. [18] The final clauses of Article 7 enshrine a right to privacy with respect to arbitrary or unlawful interference only, protect against arbitrary arrest, and provide a right to legal representation as well as a right to undertake legal proceedings for the enforcement of Article 7 rights. [19] While most rights guaranteed under Article 7 are accorded to "all persons" or people "within Bhutan" some rights are explicitly reserved for Bhutanese citizens, such as freedom of speech, thought, religion, movement, and assembly, as well as rights to information, vote, property, and labor rights. [1]

Article 8 of the Constitution outlines "corresponding fundamental duties". [20] Important provisions include articles 8.3 and 8.5. [20] Article 8.3 states that every Bhutanese citizen is under a duty to "foster tolerance, mutual respect and spirit of brotherhood amongst all the people of Bhutan transcending religious, linguistic, regional or sectional diversities." [21] Article 8.5 states that people should "not tolerate or participate in acts of injury, torture or killing of another person, terrorism, abuse of women, children or any other person and shall take necessary steps to prevent such acts." [22]

International obligations

Although Bhutan's Constitution was framed to reflect various basic human rights protected by international conventions, Bhutan itself has neither signed nor ratified many key international treaties addressing human rights, including the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). [23] Bhutan is party to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), as well as the CRC's first two optional protocols. [23] Bhutan has also signed, though not ratified, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). [23]

Bhutan joined the United Nations in 1971. [24] It has therefore been subject to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), having gone through two cycles so far; first in 2009 and again in 2014. [25] [26]

Gross national happiness

In its national report under the first cycle of the UPR, Bhutan's Royal Government asserted that the enjoyment of all human rights is necessary to achieve GNH, "to which it is also deeply committed". [27] GNH was said to establish the "framework for the protection, promotion and integration of human rights into the fabric of Bhutanese society." [28] This connection between GNH and human rights within Bhutan was reaffirmed in its national report under the second cycle, where Bhutan concluded by stating that social and economic rights were "reflected in its developmental concept of GNH." [29]

The concept of GNH was first articulated by Bhutan's fourth king, Jigme Singye Wangchuck, in 1972. [30] The development concept, rather than employing "conventional income-based measures", focuses on the happiness of individuals and the maximisation thereof through an aspirational, spiritual, and cultural lens. [28] GNH has four "pillars". They are: [30]

Bhutan's first national report to the UPR explicitly related these pillars to human rights, which it said were embodied within them. [28] The first pillar is said to represent economic rights, ensuring that "present development does not compromise the right to development of future generations... and that every person in the country benefits from development activities." [28] The second pillar is said to protect cultural rights and reflect Bhutan's non-discriminatory nature. [28]

Human rights issues

Lhotshampa discrimination

The Lhotshampa are a heterogeneous Bhutanese people of Nepalese origin who have historically inhabited the southern regions of Bhutan. [31] The Nepali who would become the Lhotshampa, or "southerners", began to emigrate from Nepal to Bhutan in the late 19th century. [32] By the late 1980s, Bhutan's government recognised 28% of the population as Lhotshampa, though unofficial estimates go as high as 40% and also estimate that only 15% were legal residents. [33] The extent of the Lhotshampa population became apparent in the 1988 census. [34]

Subsequently, ethnic tensions strengthened in Bhutan, with many Lhotshampa branded as illegal immigrants, citizenship laws were enforced by new measures and an emphasis was placed on the "Tibetan-based Bhutanese culture, antagonising [the] minority Nepali community." [34] To that end, conformity began to be demanded of the Lhotshampa in numerous ways. In 1989, the Nepali language was prohibited from being used in schools. [34] That same year, a traditional Bhutanese dress code, the Driglam Namzha, was enforced among the general public, eschewing any traditional Nepali "costume" that might otherwise have been worn by Lhotshampas. [35]

Violent unrest and anti-government protests occurred in 1990 within southern Bhutan in response to the "Bhutanization policies" that had been implemented. [34] [36] This "revolt" was met with a "crackdown" by the government that included the closure of 66 schools in southern Bhutan, [2] [37] as well as "harassment, arrests, and the burning of [Lhotshampa] homes." [38] In late 1990 Lhotshampa refugees began entering Nepal, [39] forced to leave Bhutan by the government after having been "arbitrarily stripped of their nationality." [2] [40] [41] [42] By 1995 86,000 Lhotshampa had taken up refugee status in Nepal, roughly one-sixth of Bhutan's then population of 509,000. [36] [43]

Unsuccessful talks between Nepal and Bhutan regarding the status of Bhutanese refugees, in particular regarding Nepal's desire for them to be repatriated, were held in 1993, 1996, and 2001. [34] [36] By 2009 some 111,000 Lhotshampa resided within refugee camps in Nepal when a "third country resettlement program" began which has seen 88,770 Bhutanese refugees resettled, including 75,000 in the United States. [40] [2] As of September 2015, 10,000 Lhotshampa remain in refugee camps in Nepal overseen by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). [41]

Bhutan's refugee situation has been categorised by Amnesty International as "one of the most protracted and neglected refugee crises in the world", [42] with possible resolutions to the 'crisis' continuing to have been raised in the report of the working group for Bhutan's 2nd UPR cycle. [44] There are ongoing delays by Bhutan's government to implement a process by which those Bhutanese refugees remaining in Nepal might be identified and repatriated. [41] Of the Lhotshampa remaining in Bhutan many are not citizens or enjoy only limited citizenship rights, as there are categories of citizenship which affect their ability to receive a passport or vote. [2]

Whether someone is a citizen may also affect which fundamental rights they are afforded under the Constitution. [1] Bhutan's Constitution has also been criticised for not adequately defining or protecting the rights of "Nepali speakers" (the Lhotshampa). [45]

The United States Department of State has noted in its 2015 report on Bhutan's human rights practices that there were unconfirmed reports of ongoing discrimination towards Lhotshampas preventing them from obtaining security clearances necessary to work in government jobs, from enrolling in higher education and obtaining licenses necessary to run private businesses. [46] That report also noted that according to NGOs an unknown number of Lhotshampa in southern Bhutan were stateless persons who subsequently have trouble accessing public healthcare, employment, education, travel documents, and also owning businesses. [47]

Religious freedom

Article 7.4 of the Constitution of Bhutan states that: "A Bhutanese citizen shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. No person shall be compelled to belong to another faith by means of coercion or inducement." [9] Article 8.3 places the corresponding duty upon citizens to "foster tolerance, mutual respect and spirit of brotherhood amongst all the people of Bhutan transcending religious... diversities." [48] Article 3 of the Constitution recognises Buddhism as "the spiritual heritage of Bhutan" while stipulating that the king is the "protector of all religions in Bhutan." [49]

75% of Bhutan's approximate population of 733,000 practices Drukpa Kagyu or Nyingmapa Buddhism, which are forms of Mahayana Buddhism. [50] Hindus make up 22% of Bhutan's population, Christians about 0.5%, or between 2,000–25,000 people, [51] and Muslims only 0.2%. [52] The Religious Organizations Act 2007 provides for the formation of religious groups, [2] and all religious groups are required to be registered with the government. [50] Registration is determined by the Commission for Religious Organisations, which is required to ensure religious institutions promote the country's spiritual heritage by "developing a society 'rooted in Buddhist ethos.'" [53]

Only Buddhist groups and one Hindu "umbrella organisation" have been recognised, with other groups alleging their applications have been ignored. [50] As a result, only Buddhist and Hindu groups are legally allowed to hold public religious gatherings, though members of other faiths were "sometimes" allowed to worship in private. [50] The absence of Christian registration also prevents the presence of "Christian burial grounds,... church buildings and... book stores" in Bhutan. [53] [2]

The conditions placed upon religious worship in Bhutan have led some to claim that it is ambiguous whether practicing Christianity is legal there, noting this "ambiguity has resulted in harassment of the minority by officials." [2] One anonymous Bhutanese pastor described treatment as "second-class" Christians. [2] In March 2014 two Bhutanese pastors, Tandin Wangyal and M.B. Thapa, were detained for 49 days, released, and then fined and sentenced to prison in September of the same year. [53] They were sentenced under laws relating to unlicensed assemblies and unapproved receipt of foreign funds; activists claim they were targeted for their evangelical activities and charged with raising unapproved money for civil society organisations, as well as with screening a Christian music video publicly, which they argue was done outside on private property. [53] Tandin Wangyal was sentenced to four years imprisonment but was released on bail after paying a $744 (US) fine and appealed his case, while M.B. Thapa was sentenced to two and a half years imprisonment, which he was exempted from after paying a fine of $1630 (US). [54]

There are reports of preferential treatment of Buddhists and Buddhism by the government, including extending financial support for construction of Buddhist temples and shrines and for monks and monasteries. [55] There is also a strong societal pressure placed on individuals to retain Buddhist beliefs and traditions, as well as reported cases of non-Buddhist children being denied admission to schools and religious minorities being verbally harassed by Buddhists. [56] Bhutan's restrictions upon freedom of religion, as well as the need for a Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief to visit Bhutan, were raised as issues in Bhutan's 2nd cycle of the UPR. [57]

In 2024, Freedom House rated Bhutan’s religious freedom as 2 out of 4, [58] noting that the constitution protects freedom of religion, but local authorities are known to harass non-Buddhists and people have experienced pressure to participate in Buddhist ceremonies and practices.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lhotshampa</span> Bhutanese people of Nepalese descent

The Lhotshampa or Lhotsampa people are a heterogeneous Bhutanese people of Nepali descent. The Lhotshampa were estimated to comprise around 35% of the Bhutan's population by the U.S. Department of State as of 2008. The Lhotshampa are predominantly Hindu and Buddhist too, who speak the Nepali language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Bhutan</span>

Bhutan's early history is steeped in mythology and remains obscure. Some of the structures provide evidence that the region has been settled as early as 2000 BC. According to a legend it was ruled by a Cooch-Behar king, Sangaldip, around the 7th century BC, but not much is known prior to the introduction of Tibetan Buddhism in the 9th century, when turmoil in Tibet forced many monks to flee to Bhutan. In the 12th century, the Drukpa Kagyupa school was established and remains the dominant form of Buddhism in Bhutan today. The country's political history is intimately tied to its religious history and relations among the various monastic schools and monasteries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gross National Happiness</span> Guiding philosophy of the government of Bhutan

Gross National Happiness, sometimes called Gross Domestic Happiness (GDH), is a philosophy that guides the government of Bhutan. It includes an index which is used to measure the collective happiness and well-being of a population. Gross National Happiness Index is instituted as the goal of the government of Bhutan in the Constitution of Bhutan, enacted on 18 July 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhutan</span> Country in South Asia

Bhutan, officially the Kingdom of Bhutan, is a landlocked country in South Asia situated in the Eastern Himalayas between China in the north and India in the south, with the Indian state of Sikkim separating it from neighbouring Nepal. With a population of over 727,145 and a territory of 38,394 square kilometres (14,824 sq mi), Bhutan ranks 133rd in land area and 160th in population. Bhutan is a constitutional monarchy with a Druk Gyalpo (king) as the head of state and a prime minister as the head of government. The Je Khenpo is the head of the state religion, Vajrayana Buddhism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catholic Church in Bhutan</span>

The Catholic Church in Bhutan is part of the worldwide Catholic Church, under the spiritual leadership of the Pope in Rome. The Kingdom of Bhutan falls under the jurisdiction of the Diocese of Darjeeling (India).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhutanese refugees</span> Lhotshampas, a group of Nepali language speaking Bhutanese people

Bhutanese refugees are Lhotshampas ("southerners"), a group of Nepali language-speaking Bhutanese people. These refugees registered in refugee camps in eastern Nepal during the 1990s as Bhutanese citizens who fled or were deported from Bhutan during the protest against the Bhutanese government by some of the Lhotshampas demanding human rights and democracy in Bhutan. As Nepal and Bhutan have yet to implement an agreement on repatriation, most Bhutanese refugees have since resettled in North America, Oceania and Europe under the auspices of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Many Lhotshampa have also migrated to areas of West Bengal and Assam in India independently of the UNHCR.

Immigration to Bhutan has an extensive history and has become one of the country's most contentious social, political, and legal issues. Since the twentieth century, Bhutanese immigration and citizenship laws have been promulgated as acts of the royal government, often by decree of the Druk Gyalpo on advice of the rest of government. Immigration policy and procedure are implemented by the Lhengye Zhungtshog Ministry of Home and Cultural Affairs, Department of Immigration. Bhutan's first modern laws regarding immigration and citizenship were the Bhutanese Citizenship Act 1958 and subsequent amendments in 1977. The 1958 Act was superseded by the Bhutanese Citizenship Act 1985, which was then supplemented by a further Immigration Act in 2007. The Constitution of 2008 included some changes in Bhutan's immigration laws, policy, and procedure, however prior law not inconsistent with the 2008 Constitution remained intact. Bhutan's modern citizenship laws and policies reinforce the institution of the Bhutanese monarchy, require familiarity and adherence to Ngalop social norms, and reflect the social impact of the most recent immigrant groups.

Numerous ethnic groups inhabit Bhutan, but the Ngalop people who speak the Dzongkha language constitute a majority of the Bhutanese population. The Bhutanese are of four main ethnic groups, which themselves are not necessarily exclusive – the politically and culturally dominant Ngalop of western and northern Bhutan, the Sharchop of eastern Bhutan, the Lhotshampa concentrated in southern Bhutan, and Bhutanese tribal and aboriginal peoples living in villages scattered throughout Bhutan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hinduism in Bhutan</span>

Hinduism is the second largest religious affiliation in Bhutan, covering about 22.6% of the population, according to the Pew Research Center 2010. It is followed mainly by the ethnic Lhotshampa. The Shaivite, Vaishnavite, Shakta, Ganapathi, Puranic, and Vedic schools are represented among Hindus. Hindu temples exist in southern Bhutan, and Hindus practice their religion in small- to medium-sized groups. About 75% of the population of Bhutan are Buddhist.

Bhutan is a Buddhist country culturally, socially, politically, and constitutionally, and Buddhism plays a vital role in the cultural and spiritual heritage of the nation.

The development of Bhutanese democracy has been marked by the active encouragement and participation of reigning Bhutanese monarchs since the 1950s, beginning with legal reforms such as the abolition of slavery, and culminating in the enactment of Bhutan's Constitution. The first democratic elections in Bhutan began in 2007, and all levels of government had been democratically elected by 2011. These elections included Bhutan's first ever partisan National Assembly election. Democratization in Bhutan has been marred somewhat by the intervening large-scale expulsion and flight of Bhutanese refugees during the 1990s; the subject remains somewhat taboo in Bhutanese politics. Bhutan was ranked 13th most electoral democratic country in Asia according to V-Dem Democracy indices in 2023 with a score of 0.535 out of 1.

The Bhutanese Constitution of 2008 and previous law provide for freedom of religion in Bhutan; however, the government has limited non-Buddhist missionary activity, barring non-Buddhist missionaries from entering the country, limiting construction of non-Buddhist religious buildings, and restricting the celebration of some non-Buddhist religious festivals.

Bhutanese nationality law is the law governing the acquisition, transmission and loss of Bhutanese citizenship. The Bhutanese Citizenship Act of 1985 was introduced by the Druk Gyalpo Jigme Singye Wangchuck, on June 10, 1985, modifying the definition of a Bhutanese citizen. The Act was implemented as part of a new national policy of Driglam Namzha, national customs and etiquette. Because of its emphasis on Bhutanese culture, the Act is also referred to as the "One Nation, One People Act." The 1985 Act was amended by the Immigration Act of 2007 and then superseded in 2008 by the Constitution of Bhutan insofar as previous laws are inconsistent; where not inconsistent, the provisions of the 2007 Act, the 1985 Act, and previous Acts relating to immigration continue in effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibetan diaspora</span> Communities of Tibetans living outside of Tibet

The Tibetan diaspora is the relocation of Tibetan people from Tibet, their country of origin, to other nation states to live as exiles and refugees in communities. The diaspora of Tibetan people began in the early 1950s, peaked after the 1959 Tibetan uprising, and continues.

Goldhap refugee camp is a small refugee camp in Nepal populated by just over 4,600 Bhutanese refugees as of 2011. Because of its dwindling population, the UNHCR merged Goldhap into the nearby Beldangi refugee camps. The camp is located near the settlement of Goldhap, along the Thulo Bato Road, directly abutting the Charali Jungle in Jhapa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhutan–Nepal relations</span> Bilateral relations

Relations between Bhutan and Nepal were formally established in 1983. Both Himalayan countries are landlocked, separated only by the Indian State of Sikkim. Both countries are bordered by India and the People's Republic of China. However, the current state of relations remains strained owing to the Bhutanese refugee crisis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Bhutan</span> Supreme law of Bhutan

The Constitution of Kingdom of Bhutan was enacted 18 July 2008 by the Royal Government of Bhutan. The Constitution was thoroughly planned by several government officers and agencies over a period of almost seven years amid increasing democratic reforms in Bhutan. The current Constitution is based on Buddhist philosophy, international Conventions on Human Rights, comparative analysis of 20 other modern constitutions, public opinion, and existing laws, authorities, and precedents. According to Princess Sonam Wangchuck, the constitutional committee was particularly influenced by the Constitution of South Africa because of its strong protection of human rights.

Mangala Sharma is a human and women's rights activist and the first winner of the Ginetta Sagan Fund Award in 1997. She was exiled from the country in March 1992 after being outspoken against the government's "One Nation, One People" policy and their discrimination against ethnic minorities, known as Lhotshampas. Since her exile, she has formed the Bhutanese Refugees Aid for Victims of Violence (BRAVE), a self-help organization dedicated to assisting affected refugees from Bhutan. BRAVE facilitates counseling and training in all eight of the Bhutanese refugee camps in Nepal. In 1995 Sharma took some of the women refugees to Beijing, China to the International Women Conference. There she got help from the United States Government, the United Nations and the Australian Government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethnic cleansing in Bhutan</span> Expulsion and ethnic cleansing of Nepali in Bhutan

Ethnic cleansing in Bhutan refers to acts of violence to remove the Lhotshampa, or ethnic Nepalis, from Bhutan. Inter-ethnic tensions in Bhutan have resulted in the flight of many Lhotshampa to Nepal, many of whom have been expelled by the Bhutanese military. By 1996, over 100,000 Bhutanese refugees were living in refugee camps in Nepal. Many have since resettled in Western countries.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Vishal Arora, "Bhutan's Human Rights Record Defies 'Happiness' Claim" (25 April 2014) The Diplomat.
  3. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, 2011 Human Rights Reports: Bhutan (United States Department of State, May 2012) at 1.
  4. ↑ Freedom House, 2024 report
  5. ↑ National Assembly of Bhutan, "Constitution of Bhutan", nab.gov.bt.
  6. ↑ Royal Court of Justice, A Guide to the Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-12-16 at the Wayback Machine (Judiciary of Bhutan) at 15-16.
  7. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.1.
  8. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.2.
  9. 1 2 Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.4.
  10. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.5.
  11. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.7.
  12. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.9, 7.14.
  13. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.12.
  14. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.15.
  15. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.8, 7.10, 7.11.
  16. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.6.
  17. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.13.
  18. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.17-7.18.
  19. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 7.19-7.21, 7.23.
  20. 1 2 Royal Court of Justice, A Guide to the Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-12-16 at the Wayback Machine (Judiciary of Bhutan) at 16.
  21. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 8.3.
  22. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 8.5.
  23. 1 2 3 United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, "Ratification Status for Bhutan", ohchr.org.
  24. ↑ United Nations, "Member States", un.org.
  25. ↑ United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, "Universal Periodic Review - Bhutan" (2009) ohchr.org
  26. ↑ United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, "Universal Periodic Review Second Cycle - Bhutan" (2014) ohchr.org
  27. ↑ Bhutan, National report Archived 2017-05-10 at the Wayback Machine A/HRC/WG.6/6/BTN/1 (2009) at 23.
  28. 1 2 3 4 5 Bhutan, National report Archived 2017-05-10 at the Wayback Machine A/HRC/WG.6/6/BTN/1 (2009) at 8.
  29. ↑ Bhutan, National report A/HRC/WG.6/19/BTN/1 (2014) at 22-23.
  30. 1 2 Prahlad Shekhawat, "Redefining Progress: A report from the Gross National Happiness conference in Bhutan" Archived 2017-03-15 at the Wayback Machine (22 January 2009) Policy Innovations.
  31. ↑ Michael Hutt Unbecoming Citizens: Culture, Nationhood, and the Flight of Refugees from Bhutan (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2005) at 61-63, 91-92.
  32. ↑ Michael Hutt Unbecoming Citizens: Culture, Nationhood, and the Flight of Refugees from Bhutan (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2005) at 58-61.
  33. ↑ Andrea Matles Savada Nepal and Bhutan: country studies (3rd ed, Library of Congress, Washington, D.c., 1993) at 274-275.
  34. 1 2 3 4 5 BBC, "Bhutan profile - Timeline" (20 May 2015).
  35. ↑ Michael Hutt Unbecoming Citizens: Culture, Nationhood, and the Flight of Refugees from Bhutan (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2005) at 170-172.
  36. 1 2 3 Minorities at Risk Project, "Chronology for Lhotshampas in Bhutan" (2004) refworld.org - UNHCR.
  37. ↑ Michael Hutt Unbecoming Citizens: Culture, Nationhood, and the Flight of Refugees from Bhutan (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2005) at 220-221.
  38. ↑ Bill Frelick, "For Bhutan's refugees, there's no place like home" (30 March 2011) Global Post/Human Rights Watch.
  39. ↑ Michael Hutt Unbecoming Citizens: Culture, Nationhood, and the Flight of Refugees from Bhutan (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2005) at 256.
  40. 1 2 Alexander Casella, "Nepal finally waves away refugees" (15 December 2009) Asia Times.
  41. 1 2 3 Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2015: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2015) at 7.
  42. 1 2 Amnesty International, "Bhutan Human Rights", amnestyusa.org.
  43. ↑ Population Division, World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Volume I: Comprehensive Tables (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015) at 20.
  44. ↑ Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Bhutan A/HRC/27/8 (2014) at 5-6, 9-12, 22, 24.
  45. ↑ Refugee Documentation Centre (Ireland), "Bhutan: Treatment by authorities of ethnic Nepalis in Bhutan" (14 August 2009) refworld.org - UNHCR.
  46. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2015: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2015) at 8.
  47. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2015: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2015) at 9.
  48. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 8.3
  49. ↑ Constitution of Bhutan Archived 2014-09-05 at the Wayback Machine , Art 3.
  50. 1 2 3 4 Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2014) at 1.
  51. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2014) at 2-3.
  52. ↑ Pew Research Center, "Global Religious Landscape: Religious Composition by Country" Archived 2016-12-13 at the Wayback Machine (2010) pewforum.org.
  53. 1 2 3 4 Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2014) at 3.
  54. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2014) at 3-4.
  55. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2014) at 4.
  56. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Bhutan (United States Department of State, 2014) at 5.
  57. ↑ Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Bhutan A/HRC/27/8 (2014) at 7, 11, 22-24.
  58. ↑ Freedom House, Retrieved 2024-12-21
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.