Kimberella

Last updated

Kimberella
Temporal range: Ediacaran, possible 570 Mya record
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
Kimberella quadrata.jpg
Remarkably preserved Kimberella at Arkhangelsk Regional Museum, Russia.
Kimberella blue.jpg
Cast of a partial Kimberella fossil.
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Clade: Bilateria
Genus: Kimberella
Wade, 1972 [1]
Type species
Kimberella quadrata
Glaessner & Wade, 1966
Species
  • Kimberella persii Vaziri, Majidifard & Laflamme, 2018
  • Kimberella quadrata Glaessner & Wade, 1966
Synonyms

Kimberella is an extinct genus of bilaterian known only from rocks of the Ediacaran period. The slug-like organism fed by scratching the microbial surface on which it dwelt in a manner similar to the gastropods, [3] although its affinity with this group is contentious. [4] [5] [6]

Contents

Specimens were first found in Australia's Ediacara Hills, but recent research has concentrated on the numerous finds near the White Sea in Russia, which cover an interval of time from 555 to 558 million years ago. [3] As with many fossils from this time, its evolutionary relationships to other organisms are hotly debated. Paleontologists initially classified Kimberella as a type of Cubozoan, but, since 1997, features of its anatomy and its association with scratch marks resembling those made by a radula have been interpreted as signs that it may have been a mollusc. Although some paleontologists dispute its classification as a mollusc, it is generally accepted as being at least a bilaterian. [7]

The classification of Kimberella is important for the scientific understanding of the Cambrian explosion; if it was a mollusc, or at least a protostome, this would mean that the two dominant Nephrozoan lineages would have diverged significantly before 555  million years ago, and if it was at least bilaterian, its age would indicate that animals were diversifying well before the start of the Cambrian. [7]

Etymology

Reconstruction of Kimberella quadrata Kimberella.jpg
Reconstruction of Kimberella quadrata

The genus is named in honour of Mr. John Kimber, student, teacher, and collector; who lost his life during an expedition to Central Australia in 1964. Originally, the genus was given the name Kimberia, [8] however, the name Kimberia was already in use as a subgenus of Turritella (Gastropoda), according to Dr. N. H. Ludbrook; and a new genus, Kimberella, was proposed by Mary Wade in 1972. [1]

Occurrence

Kimberella has been found in the Ediacara Hills of South Australia, [9] in the Ust' Pinega Formation in the White Sea region of northwest Russia, in the northeastern of Brazil, and the Kushk Series of central Iran. [10] [11] The White Sea fossils are often associated with the Ediacaran "animals" Tribrachidium and Dickinsonia, meandering trace fossil trails, possibly made by Kimberella; and algae. Beds in the White Sea succession have been dated to 555.3  ± 0.3 million years ago and 558  million years ago by radiometric dating, using uranium-lead ratios in zircons found in volcanic ash layers that are sandwiched between layers that contain Kimberella fossils. [12] Kimberella fossils are also known from beds both older and younger than this precisely dated range. [3] The fossils from the Ediacara Hills have not been dated precisely.[ citation needed ]

Description

History of Kimberella quadrata reconstruction: * M. Wade (1972) - Cubozoa. * M.A. Fedonkin, B. Waggoner (1997) M.A. Fedonkin (2001) - mollusc-like organism with soft shell and big foot. * M.A. Fedonkin, A. Simonetta, A.Y. Ivantsov (2007) - mollusc-like organism with soft shell and proboscis carrying two hook-like teeth at its end. * R.J.F. Jenkins (1992) - hypothetical trilobite-like arthropod as a maker of feeding traces of Kimberella * A.Y. Ivantsov (2009) - no complete consolidated shell, but with mineral sclerites and several teeth in its mouth. Kimberella reconstructions.png
History of Kimberella quadrata reconstruction: * M. Wade (1972) – Cubozoa. * M.A. Fedonkin, B. Waggoner (1997) M.A. Fedonkin (2001) – mollusc-like organism with soft shell and big foot. * M.A. Fedonkin, A. Simonetta, A.Y. Ivantsov (2007) – mollusc-like organism with soft shell and proboscis carrying two hook-like teeth at its end. * R.J.F. Jenkins (1992) – hypothetical trilobite-like arthropod as a maker of feeding traces of Kimberella * A.Y. Ivantsov (2009) – no complete consolidated shell, but with mineral sclerites and several teeth in its mouth.

Over 1,000 specimens, representing organisms of all stages of maturity, have now been found in the White Sea area at the bottom of fine-grained sandstone layers. [3] [15] The large number of specimens, the small grain-size of the sediments and the variety of circumstances in which specimens were preserved provide detailed information about Kimberella's external form, internal anatomy, locomotion and feeding style. [3]

Current life restoration of Kimberella based on A.Y. Ivantsov's 2009 interpretation of the animal. Kimberella NT.jpg
Current life restoration of Kimberella based on A.Y. Ivantsov's 2009 interpretation of the animal.
A detailed diorama of K. quadrata (pink animals on the right) along with simple traces of animal movement (lowered lines on the left). Kimberella diorama.jpg
A detailed diorama of K. quadrata (pink animals on the right) along with simple traces of animal movement (lowered lines on the left).

All of the fossils are oval in outline. Elongated specimens illustrate that the organism was capable of stretching in an anterior-posterior direction, [15] perhaps by as much as a factor of two. Like many other specimens found in the White Sea, the most common type of symmetry observed appears to be bilateral; with little to no sign of any of the kinds of radial symmetry found in Cnidarians, the group that includes jellyfish, sea anemones and hydras. The Australian fossils were originally described as a type of jellyfish, but this is inconsistent with the bilateral symmetry observed in the fossils. The White Sea fossils and the surrounding sediments also show that Kimberella lived on the surface of the sea-floor. [13]

Kimberella had a dorsal covering that has been described as a (non-mineralized) "soft shell"; in larger specimens, this reached up to 15 cm in length, 5–7 cm in width, and 3–4 cm in height; [16] with a minimum length of 2–3 mm. [3]

The shell was stiff but flexible, and appears to not have been mineralized, becoming tougher as it grew larger (and presumably thicker) in more mature specimens. [3] The deformation observed in elongated and folded specimens illustrates that the shell was highly malleable; perhaps, rather than a single integument, it consisted of an aggregation of mineralised sclerites. [15] At the highest point was a hood-like structure, forming what is thought to be the front. [13] [16] In some specimens, the inner surface of the shell bears stripes spanning the width of the creature; these may represent points of muscle attachment. [3] Similar stripes around the edge of the shell may have been connected to muscles that retracted the foot into the shell. [3]

The long axis of the organism is marked by a raised ridge; the middle axis is slightly humped. Kimberella's body had no visible segmentation but had a series of repeated "modules". Each module included a well-developed band of dorso-ventral muscles running from the top to the single, broad, muscular "foot", and smaller, transverse ventral muscles laterally across the underside of the body. The combination of these dorso-ventral and transverse ventral muscle bands enabled Kimberella to move by rippling its foot. [13] [16]

The body also had a frilled fringe that may have been part of the animal's respiratory system, performing a function similar to that of gills. The fact that the fringe extended well beyond the shell may indicate that Kimberella's "gills" were inefficient and needed a large area, or that there were no effective predators on Kimberella and the shell's main function was to provide a platform for the muscles. [16]

Ecology

Kimberella dwelt in shallow waters (up to tens of meters in depth), sharing the calm, well-oxygenated sea floor with photosynthetic organisms and microbial mats. [3] Assemblages bearing Kimberella often also bear fossils of Andiva , Yorgia , Dickinsonia , Tribrachidium and Charniodiscus , suggesting that it lived alongside these organisms. [3]

Kimberella probably grazed on microbial mats, but a selective predatory habit cannot be ruled out. [3] Fossilized gut content seems to confirm it was grazing on bentic bacteria and algae, the latter having gone through their own ecological "big bang" 650 million years ago in the marine ecosystem, providing a more nutrient rich diet for early animals. [17] [18] Fedonkin reckons that as it ate, it moved "backwards"; the trail thus created was destroyed by the subsequent grazing activity. [3] Conversely, Gehling et al. claim that it moved 'forwards'. [19] Fans of grooves are often found radiating from the "head" end of the organism; these indicate that the organism stayed in one place, and raked the surface of the microbial mat towards it by extension of its head, which bore two "teeth". [15] Gehling et al. reconstruct Kimberella as having a long neck that operated like the arm of a digger, rotating about an axis perpendicular to the sea floor in order to produce the sweep of the fan, and rotating towards and away from the animal to scrape food from the substrate to the mouth. In one community Kimberella has been shown to be avoiding its grazing traces, demonstrating complex sensory behaviour. [20]

The lack of evidence of asexual reproduction suggests that the organisms reproduced sexually. Budding or fission has never been observed. [3]

The waters in which Kimberella dwelt were occasionally disturbed by sandy currents, caused when sediments were whipped up by storms or meltwater discharge, and washed over the creatures. In response to this stress, the organisms appear to have retracted their soft parts into their shells; apparently they could not move fast enough to outrun the currents. [3] Some organisms survived the current, and attempted to burrow out of the sand that had been deposited above them; some unsuccessful attempts can be seen where juveniles were fossilised at the end of a burrow a few centimetres long. [3]

Preservation

A fossil of Kimberella which can be hardly distinguished from the sediments it was preserved in. Kimberella (35386344055).jpg
A fossil of Kimberella which can be hardly distinguished from the sediments it was preserved in.

Kimberella fossils are generally preserved on top of clay-rich beds and beneath sandy beds. [15] All fossils are preserved as depressions in the bases of beds, implying that the organism, although not mineralised, was firm enough to resist being crushed as sediment accumulated above it; as the soft parts of the organism decayed, the soft muds underneath would be squeezed up into the shell, preserving the shape of the organism. [3]

Preservation of most specimens was made possible by the fast sedimentation that quickly cut the organism off from seawater; it may also have been enhanced by the decay products of the rotting organism, which could have helped the overlying sediment to mineralise and harden. [3] It has been suggested that a mucus trail produced by the organism may have assisted its preservation, [3] but experiments suggest that mucus disintegrates too easily to play a role in binding sediment together. [21]

Classification

Kimberichnus teruzzii, grazing traces left by Kimberella while it fed. Kimberella trace.jpg
Kimberichnus teruzzii, grazing traces left by Kimberella while it fed.

All the Kimberella fossils found so far are assigned to one species, K. quadrata. The first specimens were discovered in Australia in 1959. They were originally classified as jellyfish by Martin Glaessner and Mary Wade in 1966, [8] and then as box jellyfish by Wade in 1972, [1] a view that remained popular until the fossils of the White sea region were discovered; these prompted a reinterpretation. [3] Research on these specimens by Mikhail A. Fedonkin, initially with Benjamin M. Waggoner in 1997, [13] led to Kimberella being recognised as the oldest well-documented triploblastic bilaterian organism — not a jellyfish at all. [23]

So far, Kimberella fossils show no sign of a radula, the toothed chitinous "tongue" that is the diagnostic feature of modern molluscs, excluding bivalves. Since radulae are very rarely preserved in fossil molluscs, its absence does not necessarily mean that K. quadrata did not have one. The rocks in the immediate vicinity of Kimberella fossils bear scratch marks that have been compared to those made by the radulae of molluscs as they graze on microbial mats. These traces, named Radulichnus and Kimberichnus , have been interpreted as circumstantial evidence for the presence of a radula. In conjunction with the univalve shell, this has been taken to indicate Kimberella was a mollusc or very closely related to molluscs. [13] In 2001 and 2007, Fedonkin suggested that the feeding mechanism might be a retractable proboscis with hook-like organs at its end. [16] Kimberella's feeding apparatus appears to differ significantly from the typical mollusc radula, and this demonstrates that Kimberella is at best a stem-group mollusc. [24] Notably, the scratch marks indicate that the 'teeth' were dragged towards the organism, not pushed away as in molluscs, and that the maximum impact on the sediment was when the mouthpart was furthest from the organism. [25] The direction of grazing is also backwards, as opposed to forwards as in molluscs. [25] Furthermore, the constant width of grooves implies stereoglossy – a trait that is very derived in molluscs. [26] It has been argued that the shape of the feeding traces is incompatible with a radula, and that despite the molluscan body form, the lack of a radula places Kimberella well outside the molluscan crown group. [15] Butterfield points out that plenty of other groups of organisms bear structures capable of making similar marks. [7] [27]

Taken together, sceptics doubt that the available evidence is enough to reliably identify Kimberella as a mollusc or near-mollusc, and suggest that it is presumptuous to call it anything more than a "possible" mollusc, [12] or even just a "probable bilaterian". [7]

Possible known relative of Kimberella is Solza margarita from Russia. Some use grouping "Kimberellomorpha" for those two genera, [6] and some even consider that Solza would be taphonomic variety of Kimberella. [2]

Theoretical importance

The Cambrian explosion is an apparently rapid increase in the variety of basic body structures of animals in the Early Cambrian period, starting after 543  million years ago and finishing before 518  million years ago. [28] A few of the Early Cambrian fossils were already known in the mid-19th century, and Charles Darwin saw the apparently sudden appearance and diversification of animals as one of the main objections that could be made against his theory of evolution by natural selection. [29]

The majority of animals more complex than jellyfish and other cnidarians are split into two groups, the protostomes and deuterostomes. [23] The mollusc-like features of Kimberella strongly suggest that it was a member of the protostomes. [13] [16] If so, this means that the protostome and deuterostome lineages must have split some time before Kimberella appeared — at least 558  million years ago, and hence well before the start of the Cambrian 538.8  million years ago. Even if it is not a protostome, it is widely accepted as a member of the more inclusive bilaterian clade. [23] [7] Since fossils of rather modern-looking cnidarians have been found in the Doushantuo lagerstätte, the cnidarian and bilaterian lineages would have diverged well over 580  million years ago. [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ediacaran</span> Third and last period of the Neoproterozoic Era

The Ediacaran is a geological period of the Neoproterozoic Era that spans 96 million years from the end of the Cryogenian Period at 635 Mya to the beginning of the Cambrian Period at 538.8 Mya. It is the last period of the Proterozoic Eon as well as the last of the so-called "Precambrian supereon", before the beginning of the subsequent Cambrian Period marks the start of the Phanerozoic Eon, where recognizable fossil evidence of life becomes common.

<i>Dickinsonia</i> Extinct genus of early animals

Dickinsonia is a genus of extinct organism, most likely an animal, that lived during the late Ediacaran period in what is now Australia, China, Russia, and Ukraine. It is one of the best known members of the Ediacaran biota. The individual Dickinsonia typically resembles a bilaterally symmetrical ribbed oval. Its affinities are presently unknown; its mode of growth has been considered consistent with a stem-group bilaterian affinity, though various other affinities have been proposed. It lived during the late Ediacaran. The discovery of cholesterol molecules in fossils of Dickinsonia lends support to the idea that Dickinsonia was an animal, though these results have been questioned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trace fossil</span> Geological record of biological activity

A trace fossil, also known as an ichnofossil, is a fossil record of biological activity by lifeforms but not the preserved remains of the organism itself. Trace fossils contrast with body fossils, which are the fossilized remains of parts of organisms' bodies, usually altered by later chemical activity or by mineralization. The study of such trace fossils is ichnology - the work of ichnologists.

<i>Spriggina</i> Extinct genus of animals

Spriggina is a genus of early animals whose relationship to living animals is unclear. Fossils of Spriggina are known from the late Ediacaran period in what is now South Australia. Spriggina floundersi is the official fossil emblem of South Australia; it has been found nowhere else.

<i>Cephalonega</i> Extinct genus of invertebrates

Cephalonega stepanovi is a fossil organism from Ediacaran deposits of the Arkhangelsk Region, Russia. It was described by Mikhail A. Fedonkin in 1976

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of molluscs</span> The origin and diversification of molluscs through geologic time

The evolution of the molluscs is the way in which the Mollusca, one of the largest groups of invertebrate animals, evolved. This phylum includes gastropods, bivalves, scaphopods, cephalopods, and several other groups. The fossil record of mollusks is relatively complete, and they are well represented in most fossil-bearing marine strata. Very early organisms which have dubiously been compared to molluscs include Kimberella and Odontogriphus.

<i>Odontogriphus</i> Genus of soft-bodied animals from middle Cambrian

Odontogriphus is a genus of soft-bodied animals known from middle Cambrian Lagerstätte. Reaching as much as 12.5 centimetres (4.9 in) in length, Odontogriphus is a flat, oval bilaterian which apparently had a single muscular foot and a "shell" on its back that was moderately rigid but of a material unsuited to fossilization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trilobozoa</span> Extinct phylum of triradially symmetrical animals

Trilobozoa is a phylum of extinct, sessile animals that were originally classified into the Cnidaria. The basic body plan of trilobozoans is often a triradial or radial sphere-shaped form with lobes radiating from its centre. Fossils of trilobozoans are restricted to marine strata of the Late Ediacaran period.

<i>Praecambridium</i> Extinct genus of marine animals

Praecambridium sigillum is an extinct organism that superficially resembles a segmented trilobite-like arthropod. It was originally described as being a trilobite-like arthropod, though the majority of experts now place it within the Proarticulata as a close relative of the much larger Yorgia. It is from the Late Ediacaran deposit of Ediacara Hills, Australia, about 555 million years ago. On average, P. sigillum had at least 5 pairs of segments, with each unit becoming progressively larger as they approach the cephalon-like head.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ediacaran biota</span> Life of the Ediacaran period

The Ediacaranbiota is a taxonomic period classification that consists of all life forms that were present on Earth during the Ediacaran Period. These were enigmatic tubular and frond-shaped, mostly sessile, organisms. Trace fossils of these organisms have been found worldwide, and represent the earliest known complex multicellular organisms. The term "Ediacara biota" has received criticism from some scientists due to its alleged inconsistency, arbitrary exclusion of certain fossils, and inability to be precisely defined.

<i>Rugoconites</i> Extinct genus of invertebrates

Rugoconites is a genus of Ediacaran biota found as fossils in the form of a circular or oval-like impression preserved in high relief, six or more centimeters in diameter. The fossils are surrounded by frills that have been interpreted as sets of tentacles. The bifurcating radial ribs, spreading from a central dome, serve to distinguish this genus from the sponge Palaeophragmodictya, and may represent the channels of the gastrovascular system. Fossils of Rugoconites have been interpreted as early sponges, although this is countered by Sepkoski et al. (2002), who interpreted the organism as a free-swimming jellyfish-like cnidarian; similar to Ovatoscutum. However, the fossil is consistently preserved as a neat circular form and its general morphology does not vary, therefore a benthic and perhaps slow-moving or sessile lifestyle is more likely. Ivantstov & Fedonkin (2002), suggest that Rugoconites may possess tri-radial symmetry and be a member of the Trilobozoa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine invertebrates</span> Marine animals without a vertebral column

Marine invertebrates are the invertebrates that live in marine habitats. Invertebrate is a blanket term that includes all animals apart from the vertebrate members of the chordate phylum. Invertebrates lack a vertebral column, and some have evolved a shell or a hard exoskeleton. As on land and in the air, marine invertebrates have a large variety of body plans, and have been categorised into over 30 phyla. They make up most of the macroscopic life in the oceans.

The small shelly fauna, small shelly fossils (SSF), or early skeletal fossils (ESF) are mineralized fossils, many only a few millimetres long, with a nearly continuous record from the latest stages of the Ediacaran to the end of the Early Cambrian Period. They are very diverse, and there is no formal definition of "small shelly fauna" or "small shelly fossils". Almost all are from earlier rocks than more familiar fossils such as trilobites. Since most SSFs were preserved by being covered quickly with phosphate and this method of preservation is mainly limited to the late Ediacaran and early Cambrian periods, the animals that made them may actually have arisen earlier and persisted after this time span.

The Cambrian explosion is an interval of time beginning approximately 538.8 million years ago in the Cambrian period of the early Paleozoic, when a sudden radiation of complex life occurred and practically all major animal phyla started appearing in the fossil record. It lasted for about 13 to 25 million years and resulted in the divergence of most modern metazoan phyla. The event was accompanied by major diversification in other groups of organisms as well.

The urbilaterian is the hypothetical last common ancestor of the bilaterian clade, i.e., all animals having a bilateral symmetry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deuterostome</span> Superphylum of bilateral animals

Deuterostomes are bilaterian animals of the superphylum Deuterostomia, typically characterized by their anus forming before the mouth during embryonic development. Deuterostomia is further divided into four phyla: Chordata, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, and the extinct Vetulicolia known from Cambrian fossils. The extinct clade Cambroernida is thought to be a member of Deuterostomia.

Ediacaran type preservation relates to the dominant preservational mode in the Ediacaran period, where Ediacaran organisms were preserved as casts on the surface of microbial mats.

<i>Kimberichnus</i> Fan-shaped Ichnofossils associated with Kimberella

Kimberichnus is an ichnofossil associated with the early bilaterian Kimberella. It is known mostly from shallow marine Ediacaran sediments, often occurring alongside its producer. Kimberichnus often occurs in Russia and South Australia, where it is most abundant in the shape of multiple arcuate sets of ridges with fan-shaped arrangements.

<i>Temnoxa molluscula</i> Extinct species of Ediacarian animal

Temnoxa molluscula is a small creature approximately 8 mm wide found in the Ediacaran period in Russia. The Temnoxa has a resemblance to a vertically cut penny bun mushroom. Due to the lack of information regarding the fossils of this organism, researchers are unable to place Temnoxa molluscula into any known phylum. The genus was originally discovered by Russian paleontologist Andrey Yu. Ivantsov in 2004.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Wade, M. (1972). "Hydrozoa and Scyphozoa and other medusoids from the Precambrian Ediacara fauna, South Australia" (PDF). Palaeontology. 15: 197–225. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-04-09.
  2. 1 2 Budd, Graham E.; Jensen, Sören (2017). "The origin of the animals and a 'Savannah' hypothesis for early bilaterian evolution: Early evolution of the animals". Biological Reviews. 92 (1): 446–473. doi:10.1111/brv.12239.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Fedonkin, M.A.; Simonetta, A; Ivantsov, A.Y. (2007), "New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusc-like organism (White sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications", in Vickers-Rich, Patricia; Komarower, Patricia (eds.), The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota, Special publications, vol. 286, London: Geological Society, pp. 157–179, doi:10.1144/SP286.12, ISBN   978-1-86239-233-5, OCLC   156823511
  4. Nelson R Cabej (2019). Epigenetic Mechanisms of the Cambrian Explosion. Elsevier Science. p. 152. ISBN   9780128143124.
  5. Elias, Scott A.; Alderton, David, eds. (2021). Encyclopedia of geology (Second ed.). London San Diego, CA Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. ISBN   978-0-08-102909-1.
  6. 1 2 Erwin, Douglas H.; Laflamme, Marc; Tweedt, Sarah M.; Sperling, Erik A.; Pisani, Davide; Peterson, Kevin J. (2011-11-25). "The Cambrian Conundrum: Early Divergence and Later Ecological Success in the Early History of Animals". Science. 334 (6059): 1091–1097. Bibcode:2011Sci...334.1091E. doi:10.1126/science.1206375. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   22116879.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Butterfield, N.J. (2006). "Hooking some stem-group "worms": fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale". BioEssays. 28 (12): 1161–6. doi:10.1002/bies.20507. PMID   17120226. S2CID   29130876.
  8. 1 2 Glaessner, M.F.; Wade, M. (1966). "The late Precambrian fossils from Ediacara, South Australia" (Free full text). Palaeontology. 9 (4): 599.
  9. Glaessner, M.; Daily, B. (1959). "The Geology and Late Precambrian Fauna of the Ediacara Fossil Reserve" (PDF). Records of the South Australian Museum. 13: 369–401. Retrieved 2008-07-16.
  10. Vaziri, Seyed Hamid; Majidifard, Mahmoud Reza; Laflamme, Marc (2018-03-22). "Diverse Assemblage of Ediacaran fossils from Central Iran". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 5060. Bibcode:2018NatSR...8.5060V. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23442-y. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   5864923 . PMID   29567986.
  11. Barroso, Francisco R. G.; Viana, Maria Somália S.; Lima Filho, Mario F. De; Agostinho, Sonia M. O. (2014-08-15). "First Ediacaran Fauna Occurrence in Northeastern Brazil (Jaibaras Basin, ?Ediacaran-Cambrian): Preliminary Results and Regional Correlation". Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 86 (3): 1029–1042. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201420130162. ISSN   0001-3765.
  12. 1 2 Martin, M.W.; Grazhdankin, D.V.; Bowring, S.A.; Evans, D.A.D.; Fedonkin, M.A.; Kirschvink, J.L. (2000-05-05). "Age of Neoproterozoic Bilaterian Body and Trace Fossils, White Sea, Russia: Implications for Metazoan Evolution". Science (abstract). 288 (5467): 841–5. Bibcode:2000Sci...288..841M. doi:10.1126/science.288.5467.841. PMID   10797002. S2CID   1019572.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fedonkin, M. A.; Waggoner, B. M. (1997). "The Late Precambrian fossil Kimberella is a mollusc-like bilaterian organism". Nature. 388 (6645): 868–871. Bibcode:1997Natur.388..868F. doi: 10.1038/42242 . S2CID   4395089.
  14. Jenkins, R.J.F. (1992). "Functional and ecological aspects of Ediacaran assemblages". In Lipps, J.; Signor, P.W. (eds.). Origin and Early Evolution of the Metazoa. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 131–176. ISBN   0-306-44067-9.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ivantsov, A.Y. (2009). "A new reconstruction of Kimberella, a problematic Vendian Metazoan". Paleontological Journal. 43 (6): 601–611. Bibcode:2009PalJ...43..601I. doi:10.1134/S003103010906001X. S2CID   85676210.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fedonkin, M.A.; Simonetta, A.; Ivantsov, A.Y. (2007). "New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusc-like organism (White Sea region, Russia): Palaeoecological and evolutionary implications" (PDF). Geological Society, London, Special Publications. Special Publications. 286 (1). London, UK: Geological Society: 157–179. Bibcode:2007GSLSP.286..157F. doi:10.1144/SP286.12. S2CID   331187. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-07-21. Retrieved 2008-07-10.
  17. World's oldest meal helps unravel mystery of our earliest animal ancestors
  18. "The algae that terraformed Earth". BBC News . 17 August 2017. Archived from the original on 2023-07-13.
  19. Gehling, J. G.; Runnegar, B. N.; Droser, M. L. (2014). "Scratch Traces of Large Ediacara Bilaterian Animals". Journal of Paleontology. 88 (2): 284–298. Bibcode:2014JPal...88..284G. doi:10.1666/13-054. S2CID   140559034.
  20. Mitchell, E. G.; Bobkov, N.; Dhungana, A.; Kolesnikov, A. V.; Hogarth, I. R. P.; Liu, A. G.; Mustill, T. M. R.; Sozonov, N.; Rogov, S.; Xiao, V. I.; Grazhdankin, D. V. (2020). "The influence of environmental setting on the community ecology of Ediacaran organisms". Interface Focus. 10 (4). doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0109 . PMC   7333898 . PMID   32642052.
  21. Getty, P.R. (2006). "Producing And Preserving Climactichnites". Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 38 (7): 475. Archived from the original on 2012-02-11. Retrieved 2008-06-02.
  22. Andrey Yu. Ivantsov (2013). "Trace Fossils of Precambrian Metazoans "Vendobionta" and "Mollusks"". Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation. 21 (3): 252–264. Bibcode:2013SGC....21..252I. doi:10.1134/S0869593813030039. S2CID   128638405.
  23. 1 2 3 4 Erwin, Douglas H.; Eric H. Davidson (1 July 2002). "The last common bilaterian ancestor". Development. 129 (13): 3021–3032. doi:10.1242/dev.129.13.3021. PMID   12070079.
  24. Andrey Yu. Ivantsov (2010). "Paleontological evidence for the supposed precambrian occurrence of mollusks". Paleontological Journal. 40 (12): 1552–1559. Bibcode:2010PalJ...44.1552I. doi:10.1134/S0031030110120105. S2CID   86523806.
  25. 1 2 Ivantsov, A. Y. (2013). "Trace fossils of precambrian metazoans "Vendobionta" and "Mollusks"". Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation. 21 (3): 252–264. Bibcode:2013SGC....21..252I. doi:10.1134/S0869593813030039. S2CID   128638405.
  26. Smith, M. R. (2012). "Mouthparts of the Burgess Shale fossils Odontogriphus and Wiwaxia: Implications for the ancestral molluscan radula". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 279 (1745): 4287–4295. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1577. PMC   3441091 . PMID   22915671.
  27. Butterfield, N. J. (2008). "An Early Cambrian Radula". Journal of Paleontology. 82 (3): 543–554. Bibcode:2008JPal...82..543B. doi:10.1666/07-066.1. S2CID   86083492.
  28. Cowen, R. (2000). History of Life (3rd ed.). Blackwell Science. p. 63. ISBN   0-632-04444-6.
  29. Darwin, C (1859). On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection. Murray, London, United Kingdom. pp. 315–316.