Risks to the Glen Canyon Dam

Last updated
Glen Canyon Dam viewed from inside lower Glen Canyon Glen Canyon Dam from Colorado River.jpg
Glen Canyon Dam viewed from inside lower Glen Canyon

Glen Canyon Dam , a concrete arch dam on the Colorado River in the American state of Arizona, is viewed as carrying a large amount of risk, most notably due to siltation.[ citation needed ] The Colorado and San Juan rivers deposit large volumes of silt into Lake Powell, slowly decreasing its capacity. The sediment will eventually build up against the dam and could affect its safe operation and lead to its failure. [1]

Contents

The dam, anchored in unstable[ citation needed ] Navajo sandstone (sometimes said to be "solidified sand dunes"), [2] nearly failed in 1983 as the result of a flood on the upper Colorado River that led to extended use of its tunnel spillways. The spillways, designed for short-term use, soon underwent cavitation and began to fail. Emergency installation of 8-foot (2.4 m) flashboards and other efforts narrowly averted total failure.

Siltation, concrete degradation, spillway operational problems, and unstable dam abutments are all key factors that affect the safe operation of the dam. [3] [ failed verification ] It is estimated that a breach of the dam would produce a floodwave that would overtop the Hoover Dam. [1] [4] The dam's useful lifespan has been estimated by some to be 85 to 100 years, and was described as "America's most regretted environmental mistake" by David Brower, then-head of the Sierra Club. [5] Different estimates by the Bureau of Reclamation and others suggest a lifespan of between 500–700 years. [6]

Overview

Glen Canyon Dam is a concrete arch dam on the Colorado River in northern Arizona in the United States, just north of Page. The dam was built to provide hydroelectricity and regulate the flow of the river from the upper Colorado River Basin into the lower. The Lake Powell reservoir is the second largest artificial lake in the country, extending upriver well into Utah. The dam is named for Glen Canyon, a colorful series of gorges, most of which now are buried under the reservoir.

Construction of Glen Canyon Dam began in 1956 and was finished in 1966. When the reservoir filled, the dam began to deliver a steady, regulated flow of water downstream and generate a cheap, plentiful supply of electricity. In 1983, major floods nearly destroyed the two tunnel spillways that could have led to the dam's collapse, but disaster was averted by a close margin. By taming floods that were characteristic of the Colorado River, the dam has led to major physical and ecological changes in the lower river. Controversy continues over the positive and negative effects of the dam.

Siltation

The Colorado River carries an estimated 45 million tons of sediment annually at Glen Canyon, [7] and as Lake Powell is the farthest large reservoir upstream on the Colorado River mainstem, [8] the sediment load is completely trapped in the reservoir as the Colorado discharges into it. This sediment is creating a steadily advancing "toe" of sediment, i.e. an underwater alluvial fan, that is advancing towards the dam. Some estimates by conservationists predict that the sediment will reach the dam base in about 80 to 100 years, while others made primarily by government agencies estimate it will take as long as 500 to 700 years. [1] It will take still longer for the sediment to accumulate to the point where it could clog the outlet works, which are the lowest openings in the upstream face of the dam. [1]

Some critics predict that if the water level then drops, it may fall below the penstock openings, which are higher up on the dam face, which will cause the release capacity of the dam to drop to zero. This would dewater the Colorado River bed below the dam which would remain dry until the next major spring inflow. Only springs, seeps and tributaries such as the Paria, Little Colorado and Virgin River would supply the river flow during these times, perhaps causing unprecedented drops in levels of Lake Mead as well. [1]

The primary failure mode for Glen Canyon dam will likely be an overtopping one spring caused by insufficient storage capacity (either a huge inflow, bigger than 1983, or insufficient storage capacity because the lake was too full of either water or sediment).[ citation needed ]

Colorado River Delta today, showing inflows mostly from the Hardy River and other Mexican tributaries ColoradoRiverDelta ISS009-E-09839.jpg
Colorado River Delta today, showing inflows mostly from the Hardy River and other Mexican tributaries

An example of the fast deposition rate of Colorado River sediment is found in Lake Mead itself, where, before the completion of Glen Canyon Dam, ten percent of its storage was already compromised by sediment. When Lake Powell levels drop, sediments deposited in its upper reaches are carried into the receding water by the Colorado and its tributaries. One large flash flood caused by heavy rainfall could move all or most of these sediments into Lake Powell, creating a sudden loss of storage capacity. One way to control sediment flow in the reservoir, without removing the dam outright, is by dredging. [9]

1983–84 flooding

In May 1983, three years after Lake Powell was first filled, an unusually long-lasting winter due to the 1982–83 El Niño event produced increased snowfall over the entire 108,335-square-mile (280,590 km2) multi-state Colorado River basin. Dam engineers anticipated a normal winter, and maintained reservoir levels at their usual levels through the winter. [10]

Inflow capacity

Spring ended with a sudden influx of warm weather and then rain. The combination of rain and snowmelt eventually produced a combined inflow into Lake Powell of over 111,500 cubic feet (3,160 m3) per second. [11]

The average annual peak flow prior to 1963 was 93,400 cubic feet (2,640 m3) per second. [12] The Bureau of Reclamation predicts that the probable maximum flood at Glen Canyon is 697,000 cubic feet (19,700 m3) per second, almost seven times the 1983 total. [6]

Outflow capacity

Glen Canyon Dam has two tunnel spillways capable of allowing 276,000 cu ft/s (7,815 m3/s) to bypass the dam's regular spillways. [13] The spillway tunnels were excavated around both abutments of the dam, dropping steeply from their control gates on Lake Powell to connect with the lower reaches of the diversion tunnels, which were utilized as the lower ends of the dam's spillways. This measure saved cost, but introduced a weak point at the elbow where the two tunnels intersected. The upper ends of the diversion tunnels were then sealed with a solid concrete "plug". [14]

While this made the spillways more economical to construct, they had less capacity in part because engineers must maintain at least 30 percent clearance between the water level and the tunnel ceiling. [15] in addition to the tunnel spillways, the dam has a set of river outlet works designed to release 15,000 cubic feet (420 m3) per second. [6] The dam also releases water through the dam's power turbines, which are capable of releasing 31,500 cubic feet (890 m3) per second. [16] The official spillway capacity is 208,000 cu ft/s (5,900 m3/s). [17]

Tunnel spillways damaged

The releases from Glen Canyon Dam in May 1983 Glencanyonrelease.jpg
The releases from Glen Canyon Dam in May 1983

At first, as inflows exceeded normal levels, the US Bureau of Reclamation engineers opened penstocks to full release. When inflow rates continued to rise, they also opened the river outlet works. The reservoir continued to rise.

Reclamation Bureau officials met in late June and agreed that the maximum water level the dam could handle was 3,708 feet (1,130 m). At that level they feared they could not control the spillway gates. [10] The engineers decided to raise the floodgates controlling the tunnel spillways. This became the first time that the spillways had ever been used for their intended purpose. Volume initially ran at 20,000 cubic feet (570 m3) per second per tunnel. After several days, noticeable vibrations were felt in the dam wall and surrounding rock. Water exiting the spillways contained noticeable debris, including sandstone, signaling severe erosion taking place within the tunnels. [18]

Reclamation responded by reducing releases by half, however, the rumblings continued. The noise was so noticeable that a worker in the employee dining room, located near the power plant, reported that it "sounded like the barrages that he had experienced in Vietnam". [18] The engineers soon closed the spillways for an inspection. [15]

Cavitation damage found

Inspection crews were lowered down the spillway tunnels in a small cart to assess damage. They found that cavitation, a known risk associated with tunnel spillways, had severely damaged and eroded the 3-foot (0.91 m)-thick concrete tunnel lining. In some locations the cavitation had exposed the soft sandstone.

The tunnels could not be kept closed as more rain fell in the Colorado River Basin and the reservoir continued to rise. Reclamation reopened the left spillway, allowing 12,000 cubic feet (340 m3) per second; the right, which had suffered worse damage, was only permitted to carry 4,000 cubic feet (110 m3) per second.

Emergency flashboards installed

As the reservoir level increased, plywood flashboards were installed on top of the spillway gates. They allowed reservoir water to rise 4 feet (1.2 m) without increasing releases.

Tunnels damaged further

The left tunnel, however, was suffering further damage, described as a "surging, boiling flow that filled the portal". [15] The tunnel had formed a hydraulic jump as it was turned into a "pressure conduit" by the surging flow of water. The interior erosion threatened to collapse the tunnel. Engineers knew that increasing the flow would decrease the turbulence but would further damage to the tunnel walls. To increase the reservoir's capacity further, engineers began an emergency effort to add 8 feet (2.4 m) to the height of the spillway gates, avoiding increasing the rate of water releases. [15]

Spillway gates at Glen Canyon Dam during 1983 flood. Note the flashboards installed atop to prevent water from overtopping the gates. Glen Canyon Spillway Gates.jpg
Spillway gates at Glen Canyon Dam during 1983 flood. Note the flashboards installed atop to prevent water from overtopping the gates.

Diversion tunnel threatened

The force of the water at the left tunnel eroded concrete near the diversion plug, a device that blocked the diversion tunnel used during construction. The Bureau of Reclamation was concerned that the water would eventually erode the diversion plug altogether, creating a connection to the reservoir floor. This uncontrolled spillage would cause the reservoir to drain, creating a catastrophe.

As the discharges from Glen Canyon Dam reached almost 90,000 cubic feet (2,500 m3) per second, with 32,000 cubic feet (910 m3) per second racing through the left spillway, [11] the 9,500,000 acre-feet (11.7 km3) of flood storage space behind Hoover Dam downstream was exhausted. [19]

Lake Powell reaches peak level

On July 15, 1983, Lake Powell reached its peak level, 3,708.34 feet (1,130.30 m) about 8 inches (200 mm) from where engineers thought they'd lose control. The water held steady for a few days and then gradually declined. [10] Inflows to Lake Powell topped 120,000 cubic feet (3,400 m3) per second, [11] [18] while releases from Glen Canyon Dam topped 92,000 cubic feet (2,600 m3) per second. Eventually, Hoover Dam was also forced to open its gates; its discharge peaked at 40,000 cubic feet (1,100 m3) per second and still caused downstream flooding. As inflow lessened at the end of the season, dam engineers were able to draw Lake Powell down below critical levels.

Tunnel spillways seriously damaged

Glen Canyon Dam during the 1984 flood GCDam.gif
Glen Canyon Dam during the 1984 flood

Inspections of both spillways found severe damage. In the more badly damaged left spillway, inspection crews discovered a 32 feet (9.8 m) deep, 40 feet (12 m) wide, and 150 feet (46 m) long hole. [11] [15] [18]

Repairs and solutions

After the flood, it was suggested that the flashboards atop the spillway gates should be replaced with stronger boards and kept permanently; this would allow an "insurance" against a 1983-reminiscent flood. [16]

Air slots added to tunnels

Research by the Bureau of Reclamation found that an air slot at a specific point in each spillway tunnel would introduce air bubbles that would prevent cavitation and resultant shockwaves. Spillway upgrades and repairs commenced immediately after the 1983 floods receded and continued through the winter of 1983–84. Through the winter, heavy snowpack was reported in the upper Colorado basin. It was feared that this would produce a flood greater than the 1983 one, and as the spillway repairs continued, water was constantly released through the dam power plant and outlet works, a rate of roughly 45,000 cubic feet (1,300 m3) per second. [20]

1984 floods possible

The engineers allowed Lake Powell's level to fall to allow for the next winter's snowmelt. When the snowpack began to melt in spring of 1984, water levels reached several inches below the top of the flashboards in late June. As summer continued, inflows decreased and the reservoir level began to decrease.

On August 12, 1984, construction teams completed repairs to the left spillway. It was tested at 50,000 cubic feet (1,400 m3) per second for several days. No noticeable damage was found in the spillways. [21]

Lake Powell with "bathtub ring" Lake Powell - Arizona.JPG
Lake Powell with "bathtub ring"

Aftermath

The 1983 flood, although it nearly caused a catastrophic disaster, was a "relatively small flood". [22] It was, in fact, only a 25-year flood, or a flood that has a four percent chance of occurring in any given year. [11] [18]

Impact of dam failure

In 1990, the Bureau of Reclamation prepared a study of a Glen Canyon Dam failure. They predicted that if Lake Powell were at high pool, about 27,000,000 acre-feet (33 km3) of water would surge out of Lake Powell at an initial depth of over 500 feet (150 m). Downstream communities and possibly every dam along the river, including Hoover Dam forming Lake Mead, Davis Dam forming Lake Mohave, Parker Dam forming Lake Havasu, Palo Verde Dam, and other dams and reservoirs, as well as riverside lowlands, would be inundated or severely damaged. [8] The resulting flood would scour the bottom few hundred feet of the Grand Canyon. [1]

Glen Canyon Dam is the central element of the Colorado River Storage Project. If it failed, the resulting damage could limit or completely cut off water supply to residences or farmlands along the Colorado River, and depending on damage to canal headworks, even cut off water to southern California. [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hoover Dam</span> Dam in Clark County, Nevada, and Mohave County, Arizona, US

Hoover Dam is a concrete arch-gravity dam in the Black Canyon of the Colorado River, on the border between the U.S. states of Nevada and Arizona. It was constructed between 1931 and 1936 during the Great Depression and was dedicated on September 30, 1935, by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Its construction was the result of a massive effort involving thousands of workers, and cost over 100 lives. It was referred to as the Hoover Dam after President Herbert Hoover in bills passed by Congress during its construction; it was named the Boulder Dam by the Roosevelt administration. The Hoover Dam name was restored by Congress in 1947.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colorado River</span> Major river in the western United States and Mexico

The Colorado River is one of the principal rivers in the Southwestern United States and in northern Mexico. The 1,450-mile-long (2,330 km) river drains an expansive, arid watershed that encompasses parts of seven U.S. states and two Mexican states. The name Colorado derives from the Spanish language for "colored reddish" due to its heavy silt load. Starting in the central Rocky Mountains of Colorado, it flows generally southwest across the Colorado Plateau and through the Grand Canyon before reaching Lake Mead on the Arizona–Nevada border, where it turns south toward the international border. After entering Mexico, the Colorado approaches the mostly dry Colorado River Delta at the tip of the Gulf of California between Baja California and Sonora.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glen Canyon Dam</span> Dam in Arizona, USA

Glen Canyon Dam is a concrete arch-gravity dam in the southwestern United States, located on the Colorado River in northern Arizona, near the town of Page. The 710-foot-high (220 m) dam was built by the Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) from 1956 to 1966 and forms Lake Powell, one of the largest man-made reservoirs in the U.S. with a capacity of more than 25 million acre-feet (31 km3). The dam is named for Glen Canyon, a series of deep sandstone gorges now flooded by the reservoir; Lake Powell is named for John Wesley Powell, who in 1869 led the first expedition to traverse the Colorado River's Grand Canyon by boat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lake Mead</span> Reservoir on the Colorado River in Arizona and Nevada

Lake Mead is a reservoir formed by Hoover Dam on the Colorado River in the Southwestern United States. It is located in the states of Nevada and Arizona, 24 mi (39 km) east of Las Vegas. It is the largest reservoir in the US in terms of water capacity. Lake Mead provides water to the states of Arizona, California, and Nevada as well as some of Mexico, providing sustenance to nearly 20 million people and large areas of farmland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lake Powell</span> Reservoir in Utah and Arizona, United States

Lake Powell is an artificial reservoir on the Colorado River in Utah and Arizona, United States. It is a major vacation destination visited by approximately two million people every year. It is the second largest artificial reservoir by maximum water capacity in the United States behind Lake Mead, storing 24,322,000 acre-feet (3.0001×1010 m3) of water when full. However, Lake Mead has fallen below Lake Powell in size several times during the 21st century in terms of volume of water, depth and surface area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">San Juan River (Colorado River tributary)</span> River in Utah, United States

The San Juan River is a major tributary of the Colorado River in the Southwestern United States, providing the chief drainage for the Four Corners region of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Arizona. Originating as snowmelt in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado, it flows 383 miles (616 km) through the deserts of northern New Mexico and southeastern Utah to join the Colorado River at Glen Canyon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shasta Dam</span> Dam in California

Shasta Dam is a concrete arch-gravity dam across the Sacramento River in Northern California in the United States. At 602 feet (183 m) high, it is the eighth-tallest dam in the United States. Located at the north end of the Sacramento Valley, Shasta Dam creates Shasta Lake for long-term water storage, flood control, hydroelectricity and protection against the intrusion of saline water. The largest reservoir in the state, Shasta Lake can hold about 4,500,000 acre-feet (5,600 GL).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flaming Gorge Dam</span> Dam on the Green River in Utah, United States

Flaming Gorge Dam is a concrete thin-arch dam on the Green River, a major tributary of the Colorado River, in northern Utah in the United States. Flaming Gorge Dam forms the Flaming Gorge Reservoir, which extends 91 miles (146 km) into southern Wyoming, submerging four distinct gorges of the Green River. The dam is a major component of the Colorado River Storage Project, which stores and distributes upper Colorado River Basin water.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Humpback chub</span> Species of fish

The humpback chub is a federally protected fish that lived originally in fast waters of the Colorado River system in the United States. This species takes its name from the prominent hump between the head and dorsal fin, which is thought to direct the flow of water over the body and help maintain body position in the swift currents of the Colorado river. The body is almost entirely scaleless, retaining only about 80 mid-lateral scales along the lateral line. The fish is very streamlined, with a thin caudal peduncle and a deeply forked tail. The back is a light olive gray, the sides silver, and the belly white. The dorsal fin usually has nine rays, and the anal fin 10 or more. Maximum recorded length is 38 cm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Navajo Dam</span> Dam in San Juan and Rio Arriba Counties, New Mexico

Navajo Dam is a dam on the San Juan River, a tributary of the Colorado River, in northwestern New Mexico in the United States. The 402-foot (123 m) high earthen dam is situated in the foothills of the San Juan Mountains about 44 miles (71 km) upstream and east of Farmington, New Mexico. It was built by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) in the 1960s to provide flood control, irrigation, domestic and industrial water supply, and storage for droughts. A small hydroelectric power plant was added in the 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Folsom Dam</span> Dam in Folsom, California

Folsom Dam is a concrete gravity dam on the American River of Northern California in the United States, about 25 mi (40 km) northeast of Sacramento. The dam is 340 ft (100 m) high and 1,400 ft (430 m) long, flanked by earthen wing dams. It was completed in 1955, and officially opened the following year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yellowtail Dam</span> Dam in Big Horn County, Montana

Yellowtail Dam is a dam across the Bighorn River in south central Montana in the United States. The mid-1960s era concrete arch dam serves to regulate the flow of the Bighorn for irrigation purposes and to generate hydroelectric power. The dam and its reservoir, Bighorn Lake, are owned by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Auburn Dam</span> Dam in Near Auburn, California

Auburn Dam was a proposed concrete arch dam on the North Fork of the American River east of the town of Auburn, California, in the United States, on the border of Placer and El Dorado Counties. Slated to be completed in the 1970s by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, it would have been the tallest concrete dam in California and one of the tallest in the United States, at a height of 680 feet (210 m) and storing 2,300,000 acre-feet (2.8 km3) of water. Straddling a gorge downstream of the confluence of the North and Middle Forks of the American River and upstream of Folsom Lake, it would have regulated water flow and provided flood control in the American River basin as part of Reclamation's immense Central Valley Project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Owyhee Dam</span> Dam in Malheur County, Oregon

Owyhee Dam is a concrete arch-gravity dam on the Owyhee River in Eastern Oregon near Adrian, Oregon, United States. Completed in 1932 during the Great Depression, the dam generates electricity and provides irrigation water for several irrigation districts in Oregon and neighboring Idaho. At the time of completion, it was the tallest dam of its type in the world. The dam is part of the Owyhee Dam Historic District, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colorado River Storage Project</span> US Bureau of Reclamation project

The Colorado River Storage Project is a United States Bureau of Reclamation project designed to oversee the development of the upper basin of the Colorado River. The project provides hydroelectric power, flood control and water storage for participating states along the upper portion of the Colorado River and its major tributaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spring Creek Dam</span> Dam in Shasta County, California

Spring Creek Debris Dam is an earthfill dam on Spring Creek, a tributary of the Sacramento River, in Shasta County in the U.S. state of California. Completed in 1963, the dam, maintained by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, serves primarily to collect severe acid mine drainage stemming from the Iron Mountain Mine. The dam forms the Spring Creek Reservoir, less than 1 mile (1.6 km) long. Spring Creek and South Fork Spring Creek flow into the reservoir from a 16-square-mile (41 km2) watershed. The dam is directly upstream from the city of Keswick, California and the Keswick Reservoir. The operation is part of the Trinity River Division of the Central Valley Project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bridge Canyon Dam</span> Proposed dam in Mohave County, Arizona

Bridge Canyon Dam, also called Hualapai Dam, was a proposed dam in the lower Grand Canyon of the Colorado River, in northern Arizona in the United States. It would have been located near Bridge Canyon Rapids in an extremely rugged and isolated portion of the canyon, 235 miles (378 km) downstream of Lees Ferry and at the uppermost end of Lake Mead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gibraltar Dam</span> Dam in Santa Barbara County, California

Gibraltar Dam is located on the Santa Ynez River, in southeastern Santa Barbara County, California, in the United States. Forming Gibraltar Reservoir, the dam is owned by the city of Santa Barbara. Originally constructed in 1920 and expanded in 1948, the dam and reservoir are located in a remote part of the Los Padres National Forest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heron Dam</span> Dam in Rio Arriba County, New Mexico

Heron Dam is a storage dam Rio Arriba County, in northern New Mexico in the southwestern United States, just north of the El Vado Dam. It is owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation. The dam is about 9 miles west of the town of Tierra Amarilla.

The Marble Canyon Dam, also known as the Redwall Dam, was a proposed dam on the Colorado River in Arizona. The dam was intended to impound a relatively small reservoir in the central portion of Marble Canyon to develop hydroelectric power. Plans centered on two sites between miles 30 and 40 in the canyon. At one point a 38-mile (61 km) tunnel was proposed to a site just outside Grand Canyon National Park to develop the site's full power generation potential, reducing the Colorado River to a trickle through the park.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Haskell, Dave. "Creating a Sustainable Future". Grand Canyon River Guides. Archived from the original on 2009-09-28. Retrieved 2009-05-13.
  2. "Glen Canyon Dam". DesertUSA.com. Archived from the original on 2009-04-10. Retrieved 2009-05-16.
  3. "Glen Canyon Dam". Grand Canyon River Guides. Archived from the original on 2009-09-16. Retrieved 2009-05-13.
  4. "Nuclear Green". Archived from the original on 2008-05-30. Retrieved 2009-05-13.
  5. "History of the River Restoration Movement". Glen Canyon Institute. Archived from the original on 2009-09-02. Retrieved 2009-05-13.
  6. 1 2 3 "Glen Canyon Dam". Bureau of Reclamation. Archived from the original on May 13, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-14.
  7. "The One-Dam Solution" (PDF). Living Rivers. July 2005. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  8. 1 2 3 "Colorado River Storage Project". U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Archived from the original on 2012-03-03. Retrieved 2009-05-14.
  9. "Glen Canyon Institute Newsletter". Glen Canyon Institute. 4 May 2003. Archived from the original on 3 September 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-16.
  10. 1 2 3 "The Year the Dam (Almost) Broke". Los Angeles Times. October 29, 1995. Archived from the original on 2019-06-29. Retrieved 2019-06-29.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 "The Confluence" (PDF). Colorado Plateau River Guides. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2012-07-26. Retrieved 2009-05-15.
  12. "Controlled Flooding of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon: the Rationale and Data-Collection Planned". U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Reclamation and National Park Service. Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Program. Archived from the original on 2009-05-08. Retrieved 2009-05-16.
  13. "Dam details: Glen Canyon Dam". U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  14. Powell, pp. 12–13
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Hannon, Steve. "The 1983 Flood at Glen Canyon". EarthScape. Retrieved 2009-05-14.[ dead link ]
  16. 1 2 Carothers, Steve. "The Glen Canyon Dam EIS: Random Thoughts and Revelations". Archived from the original on 2009-01-06. Retrieved 2009-05-15.
  17. "Glen Canyon Dam Hydraulics & Hydrology". U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Archived from the original on 2015-09-05. Retrieved 2016-08-29.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 "Canyon Legacy" (PDF). Journal of the Dan O' Laurie Museum of Moab. www.riversimulator.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2012-07-26. Retrieved 2009-05-28.
  19. Swain, Robert E. "Evolution of the Hoover Dam Inflow Design Flood – A Study in Changing Methodologies" (PDF). riversimulator.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2012-07-26. Retrieved 2009-05-28.
  20. Assuming, roughly, that the river outlets have a capacity of 15000 and power plant has a rough capacity of 30000.
  21. The Colorado in Flood. Bureau of Reclamation Video, on display at Carl Hayden Visitor Center
  22. Wegner, Dave. "Restoring Glen Canyon". Glen Canyon Institute. Archived from the original on 2009-09-20. Retrieved 2009-05-15.