Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape

Last updated
Knife slashing through barbed wire in alien territory: the West and East Coast U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps SERE insignia West Coast U.S. Navy SERE insignia.png
Knife slashing through barbed wire in alien territory: the West and East Coast U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps SERE insignia
Specialist patch worn by U.S. Air Force "Survival Instructors" USAF SERE Patch.jpg
Specialist patch worn by U.S. Air Force "Survival Instructors"
USAF Resistance Training Specialist Patch USAF SERE - RT Patch.jpg
USAF Resistance Training Specialist Patch
The "flying boot" logo depicted in the USAF Survival School Instructor Training program logo. USAF SERE Logo.jpg
The "flying boot" logo depicted in the USAF Survival School Instructor Training program logo.
Survival handbook of the USAAF from 1944. USAAF Survival Manual.jpg
Survival handbook of the USAAF from 1944.
The seven Mercury astronauts during USAF survival training in 1960. Mercury Astronauts at USAF Stead Survival School.jpg
The seven Mercury astronauts during USAF survival training in 1960.

Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) is a training program best known by its military acronym that prepares U.S. military personnel, U.S. Department of Defense civilians, and private military contractors to survive and "return with honor" in varied survival scenarios. The curriculum includes survival skills, evading capture, application of the military code of conduct, and methods and techniques for escape from captivity. Formally established by the U.S. Air Force at the end of World War II and the start of the "Cold War", it was extended to the Navy and United States Marine Corps and consolidated within the Air Force during the Korean War with greater focus on "resistance training".

Contents

During the Vietnam War (1959–1975) there was clear need for "Jungle" survival training and greater public focus on American POWs Prisoner of war. As a result, the U.S. military expanded SERE programs and training sites. In the late 1980s the U.S. Army became more involved with SERE as Special Forces and "Spec Ops" grew. Today, SERE is taught to a wide variety of personnel in three categories based upon risk of capture and exploitation value with high emphasis on aircrew, special operations, and foreign diplomatic and intelligence personnel.

History

Origins

"Survival training" for soldiers has ancient origins as survival is an obvious goal of combat. [1] Survival training was not really distinct from "combat training" until navies realized the need to teach sailors to swim. Such training was not related to combat and was intended solely to help sailors survive. Similarly, fire-fighting training has long been a navy focus and remains so today (although survival of the ship may be the primary goal). Water survival training has been a distinct and formal part of Navy basic training since World War II although its importance was greatly increased with the advent and expansion of naval aviation. [2]

The origins of what is now called SERE are rooted in the leadership of Britain's MI9 Evasion and Escape ("E&E") organization, formed at the onset of World War II (1939–1945). Led by World War I veteran Colonel (later Brigadier) Norman Crockatt, [3] MI9 were formed to train air crew and Special Forces in evading enemy troops following bail out, forced landings, or becoming cut off behind enemy lines. A training school was established in London, and officers and instructors from MI9 also began visiting operational air bases, providing local training to air crews unable to be detached from their duties to attend formal courses. MI9 went on to devise a multitude of evasion and escape tools: overt items to aid immediate evasion after bailing out and covert items for use to aid escape following capture that were hidden within uniforms and personal items (concealed compasses, silk and tissue maps, etc.).

Once the United States entered the war in 1941, MI9 staff traveled to Washington D.C. to discuss their now mature E&E training, devices, and proven results with the United States Army Air Forces ("USAAF"). As a result, the United States initiated their own Evasion and Escape organization, known as MIS-X, based at Fort Hunt, Virginia.

There were also several unofficial private "clubs" created during World War II by British and American pilots who had managed to escape from and evade the Germans during the war and return to friendly lines. One such club was the "Late Arrivals' Club". This strictly non-military club had a "Flying Boot" as its identifying symbol which was worn under the left collar of their uniform.

USAAF General Curtis LeMay realized that it was much cheaper and more effective to train aircrews in Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape techniques than to have them lost in the arctic (or ocean) or languishing (or lost) in enemy hands. Thus, he supported the establishment of formal SERE training at several bases/locations (from July 1942 to May 1944) hosting the 336th Bombardment Group (now the 336th Training Group), including a small program for Cold Weather Survival at RCAF Station Namao in Edmonton, Alberta where American, British, and Canadian B29 aircrews received basic survival training. In 1945, a consolidated survival training center was initiated at Fort Carson, Colorado under the 3904th Training Squadron, and, in 1947 the Arctic Indoctrination Survival School (colloquially known as "the Cool School") opened at Marks Air Force Base in Nome, Alaska.

During WWII, the US Navy discovered that 75 % of its pilots who had been shot or forced down came down alive, yet barely 5 % of them survived because they could not swim or find sustenance in the water or on remote islands. Since the ability to swim was an essential survival skill for navy pilots, training programs were developed to ensure pilot trainees could swim (requiring cadets to swim one mile and dive 50 feet underwater to escape bullets and suction from sinking aircraft). Soon, the training was expanded to include submerged aircraft escape. [4]

During the Korean War (1950–1953) the Air Force moved their survival school to Stead AFB, Reno Stead Airport as the 3635th Combat Crew Training Wing. In 1952, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) designated the United States Air Force (USAF) as executive agent (EA, as below) for joint escape and evasion.

The Korean War showed that traditional notions about captives during wartime were no longer valid – the North Koreans (with Chinese backing) simply ignored the Geneva Conventions regarding treatment of POWs and showed that captured American soldiers were not prepared for what they faced. This was especially true of American airmen who took the brunt of mistreatment because of their hated bombardments and their “prestige” among soldiers. The North Koreans were very interested in the propaganda value of their American captives and their new methods (with those of the Chinese) for gaining compliance, extracting confessions, and gathering information proved unnervingly successful against American soldiers. [5] [6]

A Change in Focus

Thus, soon after the Korean War ended DoD initiated the Defense Advisory Committee on Prisoners of War to study and report on the problems, issues and possible solutions regarding the Korean War POW fiasco. The charter of the committee was to find a suitable approach for preparing our armed forces to deal with the combat and captivity environment. [5]

The committee's key recommendation was the implementation of a military "Code of Conduct" that embodied traditional American values as moral obligations of soldiers during combat and captivity. Underlying this code was belief that captivity was to be thought of as an extension of the battlefield – a place where soldiers were expected to accept death as a possible duty. [7] President Eisenhower then issued Executive Order 10631 that stated: "Every member of the Armed Forces of the United States are expected to measure up to the standards embodied in the Code of Conduct while in combat or in captivity." The US military then began the process for training and implementing this directive.

While it was accepted that the Code of Conduct would be taught to all US soldiers at the earliest point of their military training, the Air Force knew much more would be needed. At the USAF "Survival School" (Stead AFB), the concepts of evasion, resistance, and escape were expanded and new curricula were developed as “Code of Conduct Training”. That curricula have remained the foundation of modern SERE training throughout the U.S. military.

The Navy also recognized the need for new and different training and by the late 1950s, formal SERE training was initiated at “Detachment SERE” Naval Air Station Brunswick in Maine with a 12-day Code of Conduct course designed to give Navy pilots and aircrew the skills necessary to survive and evade capture, and if captured, resist interrogation and escape. Later, the course was expanded so that other Navy and Marine Corps troops, such as SEALs, SWCC, EOD, RECON / MARSOC, and Navy Combat Medics would attend. Subsequently, a second school was opened at Naval Air Station North Island. [8] The Marine Corps opened their Pickel Meadow camp (initially established by Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton) in 1951 where Marines would be trained in outdoor survival and, later, as the Mountain Warfare Training Center (MCMWTC) Bridgeport, California, in Level A SERE (as below).

In 1953 the Army established the “Jungle Operations Training Center” at Fort Sherman in Panama (known as "Green Hell"). Operations there were ramped up during the 1960s to meet the demand for jungle-trained soldiers in Vietnam. [9] In 1958, the Marine Corps opened Camp Gonsalves in northern Okinawa, Japan where jungle warfare and survival training was offered to soldiers headed for Vietnam. As the Vietnam War progressed, the Air Force also opened a "Jungle Survival School" at Clark Air Base in the Philippines.

When Stead AFB closed in 1966, the USAF "survival school" was moved to Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington State (where it is centered today). The Air Force also had other survival schools including the "Tropical Survival School" at Howard Air Force Base in the Panama Canal Zone, the "Arctic Survival School" at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska and the "Water Survival School" at Homestead Air Force Base, Florida which operated under separate commands. In April 1971, these schools were brought under the same Group and squadrons were organized to conduct training at Clark, Fairchild and Homestead, while detachments were used for other localized survival training (the acronym “SERE” was not used extensively in the Air Force until later in the 1970s).

In 1976, following accusations and reports of abuses during Navy SERE training, DoD established a committee (i.e., “Defense Review Committee”) to examine the need for changes in Code of Conduct training and after hearing from experts and former POWs, they recommended the standardization of SERE training among all branches of the military and the expansion of SERE to include "lessons learned from previous US Prisoner of War experiences" (intending to make the training more "realistic and useful"). [10]

In late 1984, the Pentagon issued DoD Directive 1300.7 which established three levels of SERE training with the “resistance portion” incorporated at "Level C". That level of training was specified for soldiers whose “assignment has a high risk of capture and whose position, rank, or seniority make them vulnerable to greater than average exploitation efforts by a captor”. [11]

While initially only four military bases (Fairchild AFB, SERE), Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Naval Air Station North Island, and Camp Mackall (at Fort Bragg) were officially authorized to conduct Level C training, other bases have been added (such as Fort Rucker). Individual bases may conduct SERE courses which include C-level elements (see "Schools" below). The required (every 3 years) Level C refresher course is commonly taught by USAF “detachments” (often just one SERE specialist/instructor) stationed at a base or a traveling specialist who travels where requested.

As the designated executive agency for US military SERE training, the USAF's 336th Training Group continues to provide the only US military career SERE specialists and instructors who are part of Air Force Special Warfare Operations and are utilized in varied roles throughout the Air Force and DoD. [12] [13] [14] . See USAF "Survival Instructors", below.

Selecting an Executive Agency

The DoD defines Executive Agency or "EA" as "the Head of a DOD Component to whom the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) or the Deputy Secretary of Defense (DEPSECDEF) has assigned specific responsibilities, functions, and authorities to provide defined levels of support for operational missions, or administrative or other designated activities that involve two or more of the DOD Components." [15] DoD chose the U.S. Air Force as its Executive Agency ("EA") for joint escape and evasion in 1952 and it was therefore the logical candidate to be chosen as the EA for SERE and CoC training in 1979. [16] The Air Force remained EA for most survival, evasion, escape and rescue related matters until 1995. But, with the growing importance of personnel recovery (PR), the United States Department of Defense ("DoD") established the Joint Services Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) Agency (JSSA) in 1991 and designated it the DoD EA for DoD Prisoner of War / Missing in Action (POW / MIA) matters. In 1994 the JSSA was designated as the central organizer and implementer for PR and the USAF as the EA for Joint Combat Search and Rescue (JCSAR) Combat search and rescue. In 1999, the JPRA Joint Personnel Recovery Agency was created as an agency under the Commander in Chief, US Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM) and was named the Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) for DoD-wide PR matters. JPRA has been designated a Chairman's Controlled Activity since 2011. [17]

JPRA has its headquarters at Fort Belvoir and as organizing agency ("OA") for all DoD "resistance" training, it has close ties with the 336th Training Group (which was given the role of organizing and operating the Personnel Recovery Academy or PRA). [18] JPRA and the PRA now coordinate PR activities and train PR/SERE globally with American allies making extensive use of USAF SERE experts [19] .

USAF "Survival Instructors"/SERE Specialists

A SERE Specialist with the 22nd Training Squadron US Air Force SERE Specialist-SrA Matthew T Cothron.jpg
A SERE Specialist with the 22nd Training Squadron

The first USAF "survival instructors" were experienced civilian wilderness volunteers and USAF personnel with prior instructor experience (and they included a small cadre of "USAF Rescuemen" United States Air Force Pararescue). When the Army Air Force formed the Air Rescue Service (ARS) in 1946, the 5th Rescue Squadron conducted the first Pararescue and Survival School at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida MacDill Air Force Base. With the move to Stead AFB and the opening of a full-time survival school, the USAF initiated the military's only full-time, career survival instructor program (with the Air Force Specialty Code "921"). By the time the Air Force opened the survival school at Fairchild AFB (1966), it also opened a separate "Instructor Training Branch' ("ITB") under the 3636th Combat Crew Training Squadron where all Air Force Survival Instructors received their specialist training (six months of classroom and field training) and initial qualification rating ("Global Survival Instructor"). They then had to complete six months of On-the-Job Training ("OJT") training before they were qualified to teach SERE (aka "Combat Survival Training" or "CST"). Years of additional training for added specialties (such as arctic, jungle, tropics, and water survival, "resistance training", and "academic instruction") yield some of the best trained soldiers in the U.S. military. [20]

SERE Instructor Red Flag Patch SERE Red Flag Patch.jpg
SERE Instructor Red Flag Patch

Currently, USAF SERE specialist/instructor training is conducted under the 66th Training Squadron at Fairchild AFB. After selection and qualification conducted at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas (SERE specialist orientation course), potential future SERE instructors are assigned to the 66th Training Squadron to learn how to instruct SERE in any environment: the "field" survival course at Fairchild, [13] the non-ejection water survival course at Fairchild AFB (which trains aircrew members of non-parachute-equipped aircraft), and the resistance training orientation course (which covers the theories and principles needed to conduct Level C Code of Conduct resistance training laboratory instruction). At some point in their training, USAF SERE specialists also earn their jump wings at the United States Army Airborne School. [21] SERE Specialists who work in the "dunker" portion of the water survival course at Fairchild are certified through the Navy Salvage Dive Course. [22] The SERE training instructor "7-level" upgrade course is a 19-day course that provides SERE instructors with advanced training in barren Arctic, barren desert, jungle, and open-ocean environments.

Air Force's SERE instructors play key roles in DoD-wide training and in implementing other branch SERE training programs (both the Navy and Army send their SERE instructors to take the basic 9-day SERE course (SV-80-A) taught by the 22nd TS (the other branches have no career option for SERE). Because the Air Force has the largest and best trained SERE staff, it assumes diverse roles DoD wide, such as furnishing SERE training for Red Flag exercises [23] .

Curriculum

SERE curriculum has evolved from being primarily focused on "outdoor survival training" to increasingly add focus upon "evasion, resistance, and escape". Military survival training differs from typical civilian programs in several key areas:

  1. The anticipated military survival situation almost always begins with exiting a vehicle - an aircraft or ship. Thus, the scenario begins with exit strategies, practices, and means (ejecting, parachuting, underwater escape, etc.).
  2. Military survival training has greater focus on specialized military survival equipment, survival kits, signaling, rescue techniques, and recovery methods.
  3. Military personnel are almost always better prepared for survival situations because of obvious inherent risk in their activities (and their training and equipment). Conversely, military personnel are subject to a much wider variety of likely scenarios as any given mission may expose them to a wide variety of risks, environments, and injuries.
  4. In almost all military survival situations someone knows you're missing and will be looking for you with advanced equipment and pre-established protocols.
  5. Military survival often involves exposure to an enemy.

The basic survival skills taught in SERE programs include common outdoor/wilderness survival skills such as firecraft, sheltercraft, first aid, water procurement and treatment, food procurement (traps, snares, and wild edibles), improvised equipment, self-defense (natural hazards), and navigation (map and compass, et al.). More advanced survival training adds focus on mental elements such as will to survive, attitude, and "survival thinking" (situational awareness, assessment, prioritization). Military survival schools also teach unique skills such as parachute landings, basic and specialized signaling, vectoring a helicopter, use of rescue devices (forest-tree penetrators, harnesses, etc.), rough terrain travel, and interaction with indigenous peoples.

Combat Survival

The military "has an obligation to the American people to ensure its soldiers go into battle with the assurance of success and survival. This is an obligation that only rigorous and realistic training, conducted to standard, can fulfill". [24] The U.S. Army has long taken survival training as an integral part of combat readiness (per FM 7-21.13 “The Soldier's Guide” and FM 5-103 “Survivability”) and combat training is largely about an individual soldier's survival as opposed to the enemy's non-survival. “Survival”, as a distinct part of modern military training, largely emerges in special environment operations (as shown in “Mountain Operations”, FM 3-97.6, "Jungle School", [25] [26] the Marine Corps' mountain warfare training center, [27] the Air Force's Desert and Arctic Survival Schools (as above), and the Navy's Naval Special Warfare Cold Weather Detachment Kodiak.

Certain skills have been identified that enhance every soldier's chance for survival (whether they are on the battlefield or not):

  1. Use weapons properly and effectively
  2. Move safely and efficiently through various terrains
  3. Navigate from one point to another given point on the ground
  4. Communicate as needed
  5. Perform first aid (evaluate, stabilize, and transport)
  6. Identify and react properly to hazards
  7. Select and utilize offensive and defensive positions
  8. Maintain personal health and readiness
  9. Evade, resist, and escape (aka "kidnapping and hostage survival")
  10. Know and utilize emergency procedures, survival equipment, and recovery systems

General Survival

All U.S. military branches recognize the enhanced risks for "special forces" and aircrew personnel. Thus, beyond basic combat skills and their specialty skills, these soldiers should have practical knowledge of survival skills to remain alive and facilitate rescue. Generally, they must have training in:

  1. Special equipment and procedures intended to enhance their survivability (ejection seats, parachutes, communication and navigation devices, rescue devices and procedures, etc.)
  2. Preparing for survival
  3. Situational awareness and assessment
  4. Understanding the environment: hazards and opportunities
  5. Prioritizing needs and planning actions for personal protection, survival, and recovery (survival decisions)
  6. If an enemy is involved - evasion (camouflage, travel techniques, et al.).
  7. Shelter
  8. Fire [28]
  9. Water
  10. Signaling (radios, mirrors, fire/smoke, flares, markers)
  11. Rescue contact and recovery procedures
  12. Navigation
  13. Improvisation - an essential survival skill [29]
  14. Food procurement and preparation

Evasion, Resistance, and Escape

Evading an enemy has certain well-known basic skills, but the military doesn't want to openly discuss its practices since this may assist an enemy [30] . Suffice it to say that major militaries spend considerable time and energy preparing for evasion with extensive planning (routes, practices, pick-up points, methods, "friendlies", "chits", weapons, etc.). Some elements of hostile survival preparedness and teaching are classified. This is especially true for "resistance" training where one hopes to prepare those who might be captured for hardship, stress, abuse, torture, interrogation, indoctrination, and exploitation [31] .

The foundation for capture preparedness lies in knowing one's duty and rights if taken prisoner. [32] For American soldiers, this begins with the Code of the United States Fighting Force. It is:

  1. I am an American, fighting in the forces which guard my country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense.
  2. I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist.
  3. If I am captured, I will continue to resist by all means available. I will make every effort to escape and to aid others to escape. I will accept neither parole nor special favors from the enemy.
  4. If I become a prisoner of war, I will keep faith with my fellow prisoners. I will give no information nor take part in any action which might be harmful to my comrades. If I am senior I will take command. If not, I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me and will back them up in every way.
  5. When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number, and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability, I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause.
  6. I will never forget that I am an American, fighting for freedom, responsible for my actions, and dedicated to the principles which made my country free. I will trust in my God and in the United States of America. [33] [34]

Training on how to survive and resist an enemy in the event of capture is generally based on past experiences of captives and prisoners of war. Thus, it is important to know who one's captors are likely to be and what to expect from them. Intelligence regarding such things is sensitive, but in the modern era, captives are less likely to enjoy the status of "prisoner of war" so as to gain protections under the Geneva Conventions relating to such [35] . American soldiers are still taught the standards of international law for humanitarian treatment in war, but they are far less likely to receive those protections them than to offer them. Because details cannot be offered, a few examples of well-known resistance methods provide clues as to the nature of resistance techniques [36] :

  1. Use of a tap code to secretly communicate between captives.
  2. When U.S. Navy Commander Jeremiah Denton was forced to appear at a televised press conference, he repeatedly blinked the word "T-O-R-T-U-R-E" with Morse code.
  3. The "code" of prisoners at the "Hanoi Hilton" Hỏa Lò Prison: "Take physical torture until you are right at the edge of losing your ability to be rational. At that point, lie, do, or say whatever you must do to survive. But you first must take physical torture." [37] [38]
  4. A pilot POW who gave the name of comic book heroes when his captors demanded the name of his fellow pilots [39] .
  5. Much from The Great Escape (book).

The teaching of "resistance" is typically done in a "simulation laboratory" setting where "resistance training" instructors act as hostile captors and soldier-students are treated as realistically as possible as captives/POWs with isolation, harsh conditions, close confinement, stress, mock interrogation, and "torture simulations". While it is impossible to simulate the reality of hostile captivity, such training has proven very effective in helping those who have endured captivity know what to expect of their captivity and themselves under such conditions. [40] [41]

Code of Conduct Training Levels

Under current DoD public policy, SERE Code of Conduct (aka "Resistance") training has three levels: [42]

  • Level A: Entry level training. These are the Code of Conduct classes (now commonly taken on-line) required for all military personnel - normally at recruit training ("basic") [43] and "OCS" Officer Candidate School. [44]
  • Level B: For those operating or expected to operate forward of the division rear boundary and up to the forward line of own troops (FLOT). Normally limited to aircrew of the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force. Level B focuses on survival and evasion, with resistance in terms of initial capture.
  • Level C: For troops at a high risk of capture and whose position, rank, or seniority make them vulnerable to greater than average exploitation efforts by any captor. Level C training focuses on resistance to exploitation and interrogation, survival during isolation and captivity, and escape from hostiles (e.g., "prison camps"). [45]

"Escape Training" has elements similar to evasion and resistance training - if details are revealed, we potentially help adversaries and harm our soldiers. Much of this training has to do with observation, planning, preparation, and contingencies. And much of this comes from historical experience so public sources are revealing (such as the movies The Great Escape (film) and Rescue Dawn).

Special Survival Situations

1. Water (ocean, river, littoral) Survival: Military personnel are much more likely to find themselves in a water survival situation than others. How to survive in water is taught at Navy Recruit Training, Navy SUBSCOL Submarine Escape Training, the Air Force Water Survival Course and at a separate SoF Special Forces Professional Military Education (PME) courses. Featured in such courses are topics and exercises such as: [46]

  1. Underwater escape from vessel/vehicle (from submarines to aircraft)
  2. Water parachute landing
  3. Swimming out from under a parachute
  4. Dealing with "rough" water"
  5. Boarding and getting out of a life raft
  6. Life in a raft
  7. Use of aquatic survival gear
  8. Aquatic environment hazards
  9. Aquatic environment first aid (seasickness, immersion injuries, animal injuries)
  10. Food and water procurement and preparation
  11. Drown-proofing, swimming, flotation
  12. Special Psychological Concerns
  13. Ocean ecology [47]

2. Arctic (sea ice, tundra) Survival: Air Force aircrews spend considerable time flying over arctic regions Polar Routes and while modern arctic survival situations are rare, the training remains useful and worthwhile because its content obviously relates to winter survival anywhere. All U.S. military branches have some type of cold/winter/mountain survival training originating from hard-learned lessons during the Korean War (see above and below). Dealing with cold conditions presents several unique content areas:

  1. Cold injuries: [48] frostbite, hypothermia, chilblains, immersion foot
  2. Snow/Ice/Cold Issues: snow blindness, avalanches/ice fall, icebergs, wind chill
  3. Staying Warm
  4. Why an igloo or snow cave is far better than a tent
  5. Firecraft
  6. Saving calories, burning calories, and finding calories.
  7. Arctic/Snow Travel
  8. Water
  9. Hazards of moisture/Keeping dry

3. Desert Survival: While desert survival training was part of U.S. military survival courses since their inception (see Air Forces Manual No. 21) [49] the focus of survival training went that direction in 1990 with Operation Desert Shield Gulf War (1990-1991). Desert survival training is likely to remain a major focus in the foreseeable future. While there is a common mistake to think of deserts as hot, much of the Arctic (and Antarctic) is also desert polar desert. And under the definition of desert climate (a climate in which there is an excess of evaporation over precipitation), some deserts are deemed "cold weather deserts" (such as the Gobi Desert. [50] Because the unifying feature of all deserts is a lack of water, that is the focus for desert survival:

  1. Conserve water (but don't over-do it): If it's hot, avoid perspiration; if it's cold, avoid dehydrating respiration [51]
  2. Understanding dehydration
  3. Water sources in arid regions
  4. Hot desert - shelter by day, move/act by night
  5. Cold desert - trap breath moisture
  6. Desert shelters (above or below surface)
  7. Desert garb
  8. Desert hazards and treatments
  9. Desert signaling
  10. Desert travel

4. Jungle/Tropics Survival: Staying alive in the jungle is relatively easy, but doing so comfortably can be very difficult. There are good reasons why soldiers deemed JWS (Jungle Warfare School) in Panama "Green Hell": [52]

  1. The jungle environment: conditions (wet, wetter, wettest) [53] heat index
  2. Jungle hazards
  3. Jungle ailments: trench foot, insect bites, bad food, bad water, parasites, snake bite
  4. Food
  5. Water preparation/treatment
  6. Jungle shelter(s)
  7. Firecraft
  8. Jungle improvisation
  9. Jungle signaling and rescue

5. Isolation Survival: Isolation is not just "being alone", it's being away from the familiar and comforting. Isolation survival has long been part of SERE in the "resistance" portion of training, but has more recently been recognized as worthy of broader attention. The psychological impact of suddenly finding yourself alone, lost, or outside your "comfort zone" can be debilitating, seriously depressing, and even fatal (via panic). [54] Isolation survival also focuses upon the broader view of captivity to include kidnapping and non-combatant captivity. Isolation survival training has more focus on psychological preparedness and less upon "skills".

  1. Understanding and avoiding panic
  2. The importance of "keeping your wits about you"
  3. Focus, Observe, Plan, and Envision ("FOPE")
  4. Stress [55] “fight or flight” coping response, the "stress cycle", [56] and things to help you stay calm. [57]
  5. The psychology of captivity [58]

U.S. Military SERE/Survival Schools and Courses

The vast majority of SERE/Survival Schools mentioned in "History" above are still operating. There has also been growth in private sector SERE Schools and training (which are not relevant herein). However, there has been a significant change in military use of private sector SERE training that is relevant here. That change has produced one odd outcome - the military has found it difficult to keep their well-trained and highly experienced SERE instructors because of lucrative private sector opportunities. (A 2020 Google search for "SERE Instructor Jobs" found over 1 million "hits"). The vast majority of those jobs require military SERE training.

Branch distinctions for SERE have become less clear or relevant since the creation of the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA, as above). Because the JPRA has "primary responsibility for DoD-wide personnel recovery matters," [17] (which specifically includes Level C SERE training), it integrates, coordinates, mandates, and draws from all military branches as needed. It is also worthy to note that much of military SERE is viewed as "joint operations" and cross-branch training is common (or required). SERE training detachments (usually, USAF) often work with different branches, especially where bases have been combined as "Joint Bases" and for update/review training. In that regard, designating schools by branch may be less meaningful.

  1. SERE 100.2 (J3TA-US1329) is a joint services Level A SERE education and training course supporting the military-wide "Code of Conduct" training requirement. It is 4 hour course available on-line or as an on-base classroom course. [59]

It is common practice for joint operation SERE training to be conducted at, through, or in conjunction with individual military bases. [60]

U.S. Army

US Army aviation SERE students create a Dakota hole to conceal a fire in order to better protect their position from enemy observation. US Army SERE Training Photo.png
US Army aviation SERE students create a Dakota hole to conceal a fire in order to better protect their position from enemy observation.

The Army position statement on SERE training is clear: "The Army has an obligation to the American people to ensure its soldiers go into battle with the assurance of success and survival. This is an obligation that only rigorous and realistic training, conducted to standard, can fulfill." [24] Like all military branches, the Army operates under DOD Directive 1300.7 [11] which requires and specifies Code of Conduct training for military personnel. Because the Army views a large portion of its training as "survival" related and since the Army has more soldiers [61] than the other branches, there are many modes and schools for survival and SERE training (as indicated above and below). Army Airborne School, for example is largely about surviving parachute jumps but is not deemed a "survival school". Army Rangers, Delta Force and other SoF soldiers receive extensive survival training as an inherent part of their overall combat training (as well as specific SERE training).

The mission of the United States Army SERE training is "to ensure each student gains the ability to effectively employ the SERE tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) necessary to return with honor regardless of the circumstances of separation, isolation or capture." [62]

The major "specialized schools" and courses for Army SERE training include:

  1. John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School (SWCS) at Camp Mackall where Army Special Operations Forces (ARSOF) personnel complete their Special Forces Qualification Course (SFQC - Phase III "SF Tactical Combat Skills") [63] with a 19-day SERE course (including the Special Operations Forces' (ARSOF) Resistance Training Laboratory (RTL)) [64] that includes Level C training. [65]
  2. Army Aviation School at Fort Rucker where 21 days of SERE training is included in the Army aviators curriculum. The program has a Level C course with both academics and resistance training labs. [66] The Basic Officer's Leadership Course (BOLC) includes introductory SERE training including Helicopter Over-water Survival Training (HOST). The SERE Level C course exposes students to various captor exploitation efforts including interrogation (eight methods), indoctrination, propaganda, video propaganda, concessions, forced labor, and reprisals. A simulated captivity environment provides experience which includes wartime, peacetime governmental detention, and hostage detention scenarios with content involving resistance postures, techniques and strategies, establishing overt and covert organizations, establishing overt and covert communications, and planning and executing escapes in captivity environments. [67]
  3. Northern Warfare Training Center (NWTC) at Black Rapids, Alaska (administered from Fort Wainwright) where several courses are intended to maintain the U.S. Army's abilities in cold weather and mountain warfare. The Cold Weather Orientation Course (CWOC), [68] Cold Weather Indoctrination Course (CWIC), [69] and Basic Military Mountaineering Course (BMMC) [70] each have specific "survival" sections. [71]
  4. The Jungle Operations Training Course (JOTC) at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii is a 12-day program of instruction with focus on jungle operations and survival. Students learn tactics, techniques, and procedures required to fight, win, and survive within any jungle environment. [72] [25]
  5. Desert Warrior Course outside of Fort Bliss, Texas where a 20-day course emphasizes the "individual strain on the body from the heat, sun, high winds and dryness." There is also special focus on desert hazards ("rattlesnakes, cobras, vipers, scorpions, tarantulas, camel spiders, coyotes, camels, big cats and antelope") and related medical skills. [73] [74]

U.S. Navy

The USN Center for Security Forces (CENSECFOR) of the Naval Education and Training Command (NETC) at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek–Fort Story promulgates the Navy's SERE training. The mission of the Command is "to educate and train those who serve, providing the tools and opportunities which enable life-long learning, professional and personal growth and development, ensuring fleet readiness and mission accomplishment; and to perform such other functions and tasks assigned by higher authority". [75] This includes basic survival training for all Navy sailors and DOD Directive 1300.7 requiring "Code of Conduct" training (as above). The major Navy SERE schools and courses include:

  1. The Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) School (A-2D-4635 or E-2D-0039) at CENSECFOR Detachment SERE East, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, New Hampshire offers several SERE courses including the outdoor/field course at the Navy Remote Training Site, Kittery, Maine, a "Risk of Isolation Brief" course, and the SERE Instructor Under Training course. The school employs approximately 100 military and civilian personnel and trains an average of 1,200 students per year.
  2. Cold Weather Environmental Survival Training (CWEST) at Rangeley, Maine - the US Navy's only cold weather survival school.
  3. The Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) School (A-2D-4635 or E-2D-0039) at CENSECFOR Detachment SERE West, Naval Air Station North Island, California provides all levels of "Code of Conduct" training for Recon Marines, Marine Corps Scout Snipers, MARSOC Marines, Navy SEALs, enlisted Navy and Marine aircrewmen, Naval Aviators, Naval Flight Officers, Naval Flight Surgeons, Navy EOD, and Navy SWCC. The school operates the Navy Remote Training Site at Warner Springs where soldiers learn basic skills necessary for worldwide survival, facilitating search and rescue efforts, and evading capture by hostile forces. Additional Level C Code of Conduct training includes a five-day Peacetime Detention and Hostage Survival (PDAHS) course providing skills to survive captivity by a hostile government or terrorist cell during peacetime.
  4. Recruit Training Command's Water Survival Division at Naval Station Great Lakes ((NAVSTA Great Lakes), Illinois offers introductory survival training including: basic sea survival training; lifeboat organization, survival kit contents and usage, abandon ship procedures, and swim qualification (3rd class).
  5. Naval Special Warfare (NSW) SERE (K-431-0400), Naval Special Warfare Center, Coronado, California (mostly classified personnel recovery TTPs).
  6. Naval Aviation Survival Training Centers: The Navy operates eight water survival training centers for its aviators (Miramar, Jacksonville, Norfolk, Cherry Point, Pensacola, Patuxent River, Lemorre, and Whidbey Island). NASTC "provides and meets the aviation survival and safety requirements of all Naval Aviation and DoD activities. Through didactic classroom or squadron lectures, simulator devices and a curriculum that emphasizes hands-on exposure to survival skills, we offer the best survival training available to the Fleet." [76]
  7. Naval Special Warfare Advanced Training Command (NSWATC) courses (4) providing advanced training related to SERE and Personnel Recovery (PR) to Naval Special Warfare (NSW) trainees (SEAL/Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewman pipeline students and Combat Support/Combat Service Support (CS/CSS) personnel) and other select groups at Kodiak, Alaska and Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Air Force

USAF SERE Instructor explaining how to jump safely with a parachute USAF SERE Beret.png
USAF SERE Instructor explaining how to jump safely with a parachute

The Air Education and Training Command (AETC) has over 60,000 personnel (making it the largest educational organization in America - perhaps, the world) and is responsible for all Air Force training programs, including SERE training. In the AETC, the 336TH Training Group at Fairchild AFB, Washington has the mission to "provide high risk of isolation personnel with the skills and confidence to "RETURN WITH HONOR" regardless of the circumstances of isolation." [77] It is also the largest U.S. Military SERE training provider training more than 6,000 SERE students a year.” [78]

As with the other branches, the Air Force offers a wide scope of survival training within other courses, but unique to the Air Force is the stationing of career SERE specialists at bases around the world as renewal and upgrade SERE instructors, advisors, and PR specialists. In the mid-80s, the USAF Combat "Desert" Survival Course was established by the 3636th Combat Crew Training Wing and USAF Survival Training Schools began emphasizing "Combat SERE Training" (CST) instead of "Global SERE Training". [79] . The primary Air Force survival schools/courses are:

  1. Arctic Survival School - the "Cool School" offered by the 66th TRS, Det. 1, at Eielson AFB, Alaska - a five-day course consisting of both classroom instruction and a 3-day field experience where students from all military branches along with "the Coast Guard, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other organizations that find their members operating in arctic conditions" get to build snow shelters, trap rabbits, and deal with being COLD. [80]
  2. SERE Specialist Selection Course (where over 50% of the hopefuls don't get to "first base") offered by the 66th TRS, Det. 3, at Lackland AFB, Texas - a rigorous pre-screening intended to save the Air Force time and money - and students needless pain and suffering.
  3. Evasion and Conduct After Capture (ECAC) Course, also by the 66th TRS, Det. 3 at Lackland. A Level B code of Conduct course that may act as partial/preparation course for Level C Code of Conduct (completed elsewhere).
  4. Non-ejection Water Survival offered by the 22nd TS at Fairchild - a 2-day course with an obvious focus.
  5. SV-80-A - the USAF aircrew SERE course is the largest in the military with 6,000+ attendees in an average year. This 19-day course mixes classroom, field, and "laboratory" (captive simulation) experiences to prepare students to "Return with Honor". The course is the "standard" for Level C Code of Conduct training and is offered broadly beyond the Air Force.
  6. JPRA courses: The Personnel Recovery Academy is located with the SERE school at Fairchild and there is significant overlap in instruction and facility. The west coast JPRA facility is just across the highway at White Bluffs where separate Level C(+) training is offered (mostly classified).
  7. SV-81-A - the U.S. military's only career SERE Specialist Course is offered by the 66th TS at the Air Force Survival School at Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington and other regional locations. After a grueling selection process, successful students re-locate to Fairchild where they experience what they will teach by completing the SV-60-A course. Then they undertake a series of challenging field training exercises over a 5-month period to develop broad first-hand knowledge and experience in different terrains, weather, and situations (and differing gear). Those who graduate (less than 10%) are awarded the Sage Beret (with insignia pin), SERE Arch and SERE Flash - only to enter another 45 weeks of intensive on-the-job training. At some point, graduates must complete Airborne School. After completion of three-four years as a "Field Instructor", Specialists may be tasked to train students worldwide. USAF SERE Specialists must complete an associate degree in Survival and Rescue Sciences through the USAF Community College in order to continue to advance in the SERE career field. (SERE Specialists complete additional qualification training at specialized schools as required. Examples are Scuba Courses, Military Freefall Parachuting, Altitude chamber, etc. Assignment to each of the outlying schools requires additional training by the SERE Specialist. Upon reporting to the new assignment, each SERE Specialist must first complete that school's course (the same as an Aircrew member), and then be trained by the school's cadre in the specialized subject matter (and carry crews under supervision) before the newly assigned Specialist is "qualified" to teach without supervision. At Edwards AFB, USAF SERE Specialists are tasked as "Test Parachutists" and required to perform multiple jumps on newly introduced / modified rescue systems, aircraft, and parachuting and / or ejection systems. This includes test parachuting newly designed canopies, harnesses, etc. Currently, they are the only Test Parachutists in the Department of Defense. USAF SERE Specialists are considered DOD-wide subject matter experts in their field and are assigned to base level and command staff as advisers). [79] [81]
  8. Combat Survival Training (CST) taught by the 22nd TS at the Air Force Academy (AFA) in Colorado. Since 2011, this program has been significantly reduced (following problems and controversies detailed below). With most Academy graduates now required to attend the SV-80-A course at Fairchild, the AFA program is limited to some survival and Level B Code of Conduct training. [82] [83]

Marine Corps

“Preserving the lives and well-being of U.S. military, Department of Defense (DoD) civilians, and DoD contractors authorized to accompany the force (CAAF) who are in danger of becoming, or already are beleaguered, besieged, captured, detained, interned, or, otherwise missing or evading capture (hereafter referred to as “isolated”) while participating in U.S.-sponsored activities or missions, is one of the highest priorities of the DoD. The DoD has an obligation to train, equip, and protect its personnel, to prevent their capture and exploitation by adversaries, and to reduce the potential for the use of isolated personnel as leverage against U.S. security objectives. Personnel Recovery (PR) is the sum of military, diplomatic, and civil efforts to prepare for and execute the recovery and reintegration of isolated personnel.” MSGID/GENADMIN/CG MCCDC QUANTICO VA REF/A/DODI O-3002.05//REF/B/CJCSM 3500.09//REF/C/MCO 3460.3| MARADMINS Number: 286/18 May, 23, 2018 announcing that “Training and Education Command (TECOM) in a joint effort with U.S. Army Forces Command, and with the assistance of the Joint Personal Recovery Agency, has developed a SERE Level A Training Support Package (TSP) that enables deploying units to self-train SERE Level A in an instructor guided group setting.”

The U.S. Marine Corps operates jointly with the Navy and cooperatively with the other branches [84] in much of its SERE training, but operates its own Level C course at the Full Spectrum SERE Course, U.S. Marines Special Operations School (MSOS), Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Marine Spec Ops often train with Navy Spec Ops and utilize Navy training when it fits their needs and there is no equivalent USMC course. The Corps like to stand apart and have their own specifications for required "Code of Conduct" training:

Level A is taught to recruits and candidates in Officer Candidate School and the Recruit Depots, or under professional military education (but note the JPRA note above).

Level B is taught at the Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport, California, and at the North Training Area, Camp Gonsalves, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan.

Level C is held at Camp Lejeune, as above, although some Marine personnel are trained at the Navy facilities listed above.

USMC courses or training with survival focus include:

  1. Full Spectrum SERE Training taught by the MARSOC Personnel Recovery (PR)/ SERE Branch at Camp Lejeune provides 19 days of full spectrum Level C SERE training to MARSOC personnel encompassing Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTP) to plan for evasion, effect personnel recovery, survive and evade capture in austere environments and resist exploitation appropriately, in accordance with the Code of Conduct, should they become captured or detained. The training consists of classroom academic instruction, vicarious learning evolutions consisting of Academic Role-Play Laboratories (ARL), field survival exercises, an evasion exercise, experiential resistance training laboratories (RTL), an urban movement phase and a course debrief. [85]
  2. Mountain Warfare Training Center (MWTC) at Pickel Meadows in the Toiyabe National Forest (~20 miles northwest of Bridgeport, California) offers "specialized training in technical climbing, military mountaineering, snow mobility, field craft, survival, CASEVAC, navigation, use of pack animals and high angle marksmanship. Medical challenges include treatment of high altitude and cold weather illness and injuries, and casualty transport in a snow covered mountainous environment." [86]
  3. Special Operations Training Course (SOTC) is taught at the Marine Raider Training Center (MRTC) at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina in four phases under the general title Individual Training Course (ITC). The entire course includes six months of unhindered, realistic, challenging basic and intermediate Special Operations Forces (SOF) war fighting skills training. In the ten-week Phase I portion, Marines learn basic Spec Ops skills including SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape), TCCC (Tactical Combat Casualty Care), fire support training and communications. Survivability is a focus in all phases of the ITC course. [87]
  4. Jungle Warfare Training Center (JWTC) offers various courses taught by the 3d Marine Division at Camp Gonsalves, Okinawa, Japan. The skills, leaders, and endurance courses intend to teach Marines the skills they need should they become separated from their units in a combat zone and must survive off the land while evading the enemy. [88] The Jungle Tracking, Trauma, and Medicine Courses have more specific goals. The rigorous eight-day Basic Skills Course teaches skills such as first aid, communication, booby traps, knot tying, rappelling, and land navigation. Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape training (SERE) is conducted monthly - a 12-day course, 3 days of classroom learning of the basics of survival (how to identify and catch food, build tools, start fires and construct shelter), 5 days on a beach where the Marines survive on their own (with nothing but a knife, a canteen and the uniforms on their backs), and 4 days of "team" evasion through the muddy and tangled jungle (to avoid being captured by students from the man-tracking course). Captured student get placed into an improvised POW camp and the instructors interrogate them to test their "resistance" skills. [26]

Marines often participate in "exercises" and some of them have a survival focus. [60]

Controversies

American Use of "SERE Techniques" in "Detainee" Interrogation/Torture

Heavily redacted US Department of Defense memo discussing SERE techniques used at Guantanamo JTF GTMO 'SERE' interrogation SOP dtd 10 Dec 02.pdf
Heavily redacted US Department of Defense memo discussing SERE techniques used at Guantánamo

"The U.S. government torture program since 9/11 has been "breathtaking" in its scope, according to the detailed report submitted to the United Nations Committee Against Torture by the International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School and other human rights activists." Torture and the United States - "Torture, interrogation and prisons in the War on Terror" (See Main articles: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse, Bagram torture and prisoner abuse, Criticisms of the War on Terrorism, Enhanced interrogation techniques, and Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture). That Americans used "stress and duress" (and worse) techniques to humiliate and interrogate captives after 9/11 is now beyond cavil. While some may claim that such did not constitute "torture" and others may claim that torture was necessary to prevent deaths, those arguments are well refuted elsewhere. What cannot be overstated is the impact of President George W. Bush's declaration (February 5, 2002) that the Geneva Convention(s) regarding POWs did not apply to the conflict with al-Qaida or the Taliban as those prisoners were not entitled to POW status or those legal guarantees of humane treatment. [89] To soldiers who are legally required to follow the directives of their Commander-in-Chief, this not only excused harsh techniques, it made them essentially mandatory [90] . (A soldier's claim that this was an "unlawful order" would be a difficult defense because the legal definition of torture - "intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering" - is less than resolved. The intent is hard to prove and the meaning of "severe" in this application is debated) [91] [92] .

"SERE"?

The CIA acting general counsel, described in his book Company Man, that the enhanced techniques were "sadistic and terrifying." [93] An online magazine article from June 2006 referenced a 2005 document obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union through the Freedom of Information Act in which the former chief of the Interrogation Control Element at Guantánamo said "SERE instructors" taught their methods to interrogators of the prisoners in Cuba. [94] The article also stated that physical and mental techniques used against some detainees at Abu Ghraib are similar to the ones SERE students are taught to resist.

According to Human Rights First, the interrogation that led to the death of Iraqi Major General Abed Hamed Mowhoush involved the use of techniques used in SERE training. According to the organization "Internal FBI memos and press reports have pointed to SERE training as the basis for some of the harshest techniques authorized for use on detainees by the Pentagon in 2002 and 2003." [95] [96]

On June 17, 2008, Mark Mazzetti of The New York Times reported that the senior Pentagon lawyer Mark Schiffrin requested information in 2002 from the leaders of the Air Force's captivity-resistance program, referring to one based in Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The information was later used on prisoners in military custody. [97] In written testimony to the Senate Armed Forces Committee hearing, Col. Steven Kleinman of the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency said a team of trainers whom he was leading in Iraq were asked to demonstrate SERE techniques on uncooperative prisoners. He refused, but his decision was overruled. He was quoted as saying "When presented with the choice of getting smarter or getting tougher, we chose the latter." [98] Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has acknowledged that the use of the SERE program techniques to conduct interrogations in Iraq was discussed by senior White House officials in 2002 and 2003. [99]

It has been subsequently confirmed that in 2002 JPRA was asked by the CIA to provide advisors on topics such as "deprivation techniques... exploitation and questioning techniques, and developing countermeasures to resistance techniques". [100] What has never been revealed is who the JPRA instructors actually were, but almost every source continues to deem them "SERE instructors". JPRA is not SERE and many of its resistance training instructors are not SERE instructors (they are from the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency). The techniques they taught the CIA are not SERE resistance training methods (although they are related) - they are the work product of Bruce Jessen and James Elmer Mitchell. [101] For example, "waterboarding" (probably the most controversial of the "enhanced interrogation techniques" proposed by Jessen and Mitchell) has never been used in resistance training as part of Air Force SERE training and therefore, neither psychologist had any experience with it. [102] (Simulated waterboarding had been used in SERE training in other branches until 2007).

While "Resistance" is clearly part of SERE training, not all resistance training is part of SERE. The SERE community is about TRAINING and, within SERE, "Resistance" is about teaching others methods and techniques to help them deal with captivity and avoid exploitation. SERE instructors use “role-playing” exercises to allow students to experience simulated abuse, stress, and exploitation as might be expected if captured. Interrogation is something captives should expect and SERE instructors role-play as interrogators. While this means that such instructors must know how real interrogations might be conducted, their RT training focuses on effective role-playing in a VERY tightly controlled environment. Col. Steven Kleinman, a top intelligence officer at Fairchild AFB who was named the director of intelligence for JPRA in 2004, calls the “mistaking of role-playing resistance training as a basis for actual interrogations” a “critical disconnect” in the misinformation Jessen and Mitchell were “selling” to the CIA. When Col. Kleinman was ordered by the commander of JPRA to teach non-SERE soldiers the techniques that were used by role-playing “interrogators” in resistance training at SERE schools, he refused. (Note: Col. Kleinman was NOT a SERE officer, he was an "ISR" Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency officer). [103]

Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture

On December 9, 2014, the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released a report ("SASC report", hereafter) which detailed how contractors who developed the "enhanced interrogation techniques" used by U.S. personnel received US$81 million for their services and identified the contractors, who were referred to in the report via pseudonyms, as principals in Mitchell, Jessen & Associates from Spokane, Washington. Two of them were psychologists, John "Bruce" Jessen and James Mitchell. Jessen was a senior psychologist at the Defense Department who had worked with Army special forces in resistance training. The report states that the contractor "developed the list of enhanced interrogation techniques and personally conducted interrogations of some of the CIA's most significant detainees using those techniques. The contractors also evaluated whether the detainees' psychological state allowed for continued use of the techniques, even for some detainees they themselves were interrogating or had interrogated." Mitchell, Jessen & Associates developed a "menu" of 20 potential enhanced techniques including waterboarding, sleep deprivation and stress positions. [104]

Over the six years following their hiring by friends at the CIA (Kirk Hubbard), Mitchell, Jessen & Associates would hire over 100 staff, bill the CIA for over $80,000,000, and lead the American military (and other parts of the government) into perhaps their greatest PR (public relations) fiasco. When 60 Minutes aired pictures from Abu Ghraib in May 2004, the shock was "heard around the world" [105] . Americans (for the most part) began hearing of "SERE" for the first time and still hear it today as more and more information about American torture becomes known. While Mitchell, Jessen & Associates hired ex-"SERE instructors" we don't know how many, if any, were actually "SERE", how many were private contractors who used the title "SERE Instructor", how many were CIA that called themselves "SERE interrogators" merely because they used Mitchell's and Jessen's stolen (classified) library materials that have been repeatedly misrepresented as "SERE" training techniques". [106] They came from classified training materials (historical and instructional) used for curriculum development in military and JPRA Level-C "resistance training". [107] [108] [109]

SERE Abuses and Scandals

  1. USAFA "sex abuse" during resistance training: See 2003 United States Air Force Academy sexual assault scandal. The United States Air Force Academy has had several sex/sex abuse scandals, some involving SERE. In 1993 a female cadet alleged that she was particularly selected as a participant in a simulated rape and exploitation scenario where, while hooded and other cadets stood by, she had to lie on the ground with her shirt removed and her legs pried apart. The subsequent investigations failed to affirm the allegations and she filed a lawsuit [110] that was confidentially settled out-of-court [111] . In 1995, abuse allegations were made by one male cadet: "They dressed me up as a woman. They put me in a skirt, put makeup all over my face, and made me follow around one of the [instructors] like his little toy." The cadet also claimed that while he was tied to a bench, another cadet was forced to "get on top of me and act like he's having sex with me." [112] [113] . Following this allegation, cadet SERE training was suspended until 1998 when it resumed without the "Sexual Exploitation" element.
  2. USN waterboarding during resistance training (ordered stopped in 2007 by JPRA): "For years, the U.S. military used waterboarding, a centuries-old torture technique, to train American troops to resist interrogation if captured." [114] JPRA (the controlling agency) compelled the Army and Navy to discontinue simulated waterboard training in 2007. [115]
  3. Claims of psychological and/or physical harm from resistance training: It has been suggested that training exercises during SERE courses are harsh enough to cause students to become “psychologically defeated” and impaired in the ability to develop “psychological hardiness.” [116] I
  4. Claims of resistance training involving "torture": "The experience of torture at SERE [school] surely plays a role in the minds of the graduates who go on to be interrogators, and it must on some level help them rationalize their actions." [117] The most credible claim of simulations escalating into torture come from an Internal JPRA memorandum regarding North Island SERE school waterboarding, which says, in part: "Out of the four water boards we observed, the instructor did not stop watering students when they started tapping their toes, but instead continued watering until stopped by the watch officer or until the totally defeated student gave an answer through the water. In one case two full canteen cups were poured after the student started tapping..." (The tapping of toes is an instructional signal given to students so they may temporarily stop the training simulation). [118]

See also

Related Research Articles

James N. Rowe Recipient of the Purple Heart medal

James Nicholas "Nick" Rowe was a United States Army officer and one of only 34 American prisoners of war to escape captivity during the Vietnam War. Colonel Rowe was credited with developing the rigorous US Army Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) training program taught to high-risk military personnel and the U.S. Army doctrine which institutionalizes these techniques and principles to be followed by captured personnel.

Code of the United States Fighting Force

The Code of the U.S. Fighting Force is a code of conduct that is an ethics guide and a United States Department of Defense directive consisting of six articles to members of the United States Armed Forces, addressing how they should act in combat when they must evade capture, resist while a prisoner or escape from the enemy. It is considered an important part of U.S. military doctrine and tradition, but is not formal military law in the manner of the Uniform Code of Military Justice or public international law, such as the Geneva Conventions.

Weapon systems officer flight crew of combat aircraft tasked with operating weapons and other systems

A Weapon Systems Officer is an air flight officer directly involved in all air operations and weapon systems of a military aircraft.

Radio Reconnaissance Platoon United States military group

The Radio Reconnaissance Platoon is a specially trained element of a United States Marine Corps Radio Battalion. A Radio Reconnaissance Team (RRT) was assigned as the tactical signals intelligence collection element for the Marine Corps Special Operations Command, Detachment One. Regular RRTs also participate in SOC operations during Marine Expeditionary Unit, or MEU(SOC), deployments.

United States Air Force Special Reconnaissance US Air Force career specialty

Special Reconnaissance (SR)—formerly Special Operations Weather Technician or Team (SOWT)—is conducted by trained Air Force personnel assigned to Special Tactics Squadrons of the United States Air Force Special Operations Command who operate deep behind enemy lines to conduct covert direction of air and missile attacks, place remotely monitored sensors, and support other special operation units. Like other special operations units, SR units may also carry out direct action (DA) and unconventional warfare (UW), including guerrilla operations. As SOWT they were tactical observer/forecasters with ground combat capabilities and fell under the Air Force Special Tactics within the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC). The mission of a Special Operations Weather Team Specialist was to deploy by the most feasible means available into combat and non-permissive environments to collect and interpret meteorological data and provide air and ground forces commanders with timely, accurate intelligence. They collect data, assist mission planning, generate accurate and mission-tailored target and route forecasts in support of global special operations, conduct special weather reconnaissance and train foreign national forces. SOWTs provided vital intelligence and deployed with joint air and ground forces in support of direct action, counter-terrorism, foreign internal defense, humanitarian assistance, special reconnaissance, austere airfield, and combat search and rescue.

United Kingdom Special Forces Selection is the selection and training process for members of the United Kingdom's three regular Special Forces formations: 22 Special Air Service, Special Air Service Reserve, Special Boat Service, and Special Reconnaissance Regiment and the SBS (Reserve). Members of the SAS and SBS undergo common selection up to the award of a sand-coloured beret to SAS Troopers whereupon SBS candidates undergo further selection to qualify as Swimmer Canoeists and SAS personnel undergo further specialist training. Until the late 1990s candidates for the SAS and SBS underwent selection under the auspices of the prospective unit.

Naval aircrewman

The Naval Aircrewman rating is an enlisted rating of the US Navy. It was previously designated as aviation anti-submarine warfare operator. However, under the CNO-directed "Helicopter Master Plan", all 78XX and 94XX aircrewmen were re-designated as "aviation warfare systems operators". The description of the Naval Aircrew Rate (AW) on this page define only the "Active Duty" aspects of the AW rate, fleets (aircraft), positions, and duties that are manned by aircrew in today's Navy. The Full Time Support (FTS) and Selected Reserves (SELRES) components of the U.S. Naval Reserves make up the largest number of Aircrew in today's Navy. Many technologically advanced navies have a similar trade.

United States military divers Underwater divers employed by the US armed forces, including navy, army, marines, air force and coast guard

The US employs divers in several branches of the armed forces, including the navy, army, marines, air force and coast guard.

336th Training Group United States Air Force unit

The 336th Training Group is the combat survival training group of the United States Air Force. The group is located at Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington, with one subordinate unit at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, and one at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska.

United States Air Force Combat Rescue Officer US Air Force officer specializing in combat search and rescue

Combat Rescue Officer (CRO) is a career field in the United States Air Force. Its Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) is 13D and it was created to strengthen USAF personnel recovery capabilities by providing commissioned officer leadership that possessed an operational skillset paralleling that of the enlisted pararescuemen (PJ). The CRO specialty includes direct combatant command and control of Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) operations. They plan, manage and execute the six tasks of CSAR: prepare, report, locate, support, recover, and reintegrate isolated personnel and materiel. CROs conduct strategic, operational and tactical level planning, provide battle staff expertise, manage theater personnel recovery operations and conduct combat operations.

Steven Kleinman United States Air Force officer

Steven Kleinman is a career military intelligence officer and a recognized expert in the fields of human intelligence, strategic interrogation, special operations, and special survival training.

Para-SAR Brazilian Air Force special operations search and rescue unit

The Esquadrão Aeroterrestre de Salvamento (EAS), known by its nickname Para-SAR, is a Brazilian Air Force special operations search and rescue squadron, based in the city of Campo Grande.

Defence Survive, Evade, Resist, Extract Training Organisation British military training organization

The Defence Survive, Evade, Resist, Extract (SERE) Training Organisation, otherwise known as DSTO, is a military training organisation based at RAF St. Mawgan, Cornwall In the United Kingdom. DSTO is a tri-service organisation and trains personnel of the British armed forces in survival techniques, evading capture and resistance from interrogation, prior to overseas deployment.

Joint Personnel Recovery Agency

The Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA) is a Chairman's Controlled Activity and is designated as DoD's office of primary responsibility for DoD-wide personnel recovery (PR) matters, less policy. JPRA is headquartered in Fort Belvoir, Virginia with schools located in Fredericksburg, VA and Spokane, WA. JPRA currently provides for commanders, forces, and individuals on joint PR activities through development and conduct of education and training courses, and specialized individual training. The agency assesses, advises, and evaluates PR curriculum and establishes Joint PR standards in collaboration with the DoD Components for formal Joint PR training, including Code of Conduct and SERE. JPRA also provides DoD Components with analytical support, technology research and integration, maintenance of databases and archives, and development of lessons learned. JPRA encourages partnerships by assisting with non-DoD agencies, multinational partners, and others, with PR-related education and training programs.

James Elmer Mitchell is an American psychologist and former member of the United States Air Force. From 2002, after his retirement from the military, to 2009 his company Mitchell Jessen and Associates received $81 million on contract from the CIA to carry out debriefings of detainees and to develop and conduct enhanced interrogation techniques, which are widely considered to be torture.

Charles A. Morgan III is an American psychiatrist who has studied posttraumatic stress disorder. He is a researcher with the National Center for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder whose has worked on how stress interacts with the neurobiological basis of hardiness and resilience.

United States Marine Corps Reconnaissance Selection and Indoctrination

The two amphibious/ground reconnaissance assets of the United States Marine Corps, Division and Force Reconnaissance, are generally trained in the same aspect and environment of intelligence collection for a Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Commander, regardless of their difference in tactical area of responsibility (TAOR). However, in light of their distinctive responsibilities in their assigned areas of operations—whereas Division Recon conducts close and distant operations, Force Recon conducts deep operations—these two separate reconnaissance assets manage their own training protocols to fit their mission-oriented objectives.

RNZAF Security Forces is the Royal New Zealand Air Force unit responsible for base security, ground defence, weapons training, and Air Transport Security on RNZAF aircraft. RNZAF Security Forces operates under the RNZAF Operations Squadron.

United States Air Force Tactical Air Control Party

A United States Air Force Tactical Air Control Party, commonly abbreviated TACP, refers to an individual or team of United States Air Force Special Warfare Airmen with AFSC 1Z3X1, who are aligned with conventional, Special Operation Forces, and Tier 1 combat maneuver units to provide precision terminal attack guidance of U.S. and coalition fixed- and rotary-wing close air support aircraft, artillery, and naval gunfire; establish and maintain command and control (C2) communications; and advise ground commanders on the best use of air power.

Ground Intelligence Officer is a primary military occupation code of a U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer. Ground intelligence officers serve as staff officers and commanders in the operating forces and are responsible for analyzing intelligence and planning, deployment and tactical employment of ground surveillance and reconnaissance units. The Ground Intelligence Officer can be a Recon Marine after their training is done.

References

  1. "Every soldier, regardless of rank, position, and MOS must be able to shoot, move, communicate, and survive in order to contribute to the team and survive in combat." Army FM 7-21.13 (“The Soldier's Guide”), p. A-1
  2. "US Navy Phase 1 Basic Military Training, aka US Navy Boot Camp". Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute. February 14, 2019.
  3. Knighton, Andrew (June 22, 2018). "Escape Master of WWII - Brigadier Norman Crockatt".
  4. "Teaching America's WWII Navy Fighter Pilots to Swim". SwimSwam. September 19, 2018.
  5. 1 2 "Commentary - The military Code of Conduct: a brief history". March 16, 2013. Archived from the original on March 16, 2013.
  6. Carlson, L.,"Remembered prisoners of a forgotten war: An oral history of the Korean War POWs",New York: St. Martin’s (2002)
  7. It wasn't until 1977 that the code was modified with the intent to make it more practical by removing or changing wording that implied death was often the most suitable course of action.
  8. https://www.cnic.navy.mil/NorthIsland/
  9. Elphick, James (February 1, 2018). "Why Jungle Warfare School was called a 'Green Hell'". www.wearethemighty.com. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  10. https://www.loc.gov/item/powmia/pw046821/
  11. 1 2 "Department of Defense DIRECTIVE" (PDF). biotech.law.lsu.edu. December 8, 2000. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  12. "SERE Specialists Working to Expand Their Ranks, Improve Recruitment". January 1, 2019.
  13. 1 2 "Inside Air Force SERE Specialist Training, America's Toughest Survival School". February 1, 2019.
  14. "Home Page".
  15. "Department of Defense Executive Agent Responsibilities of the Secretary of the Army" (PDF). armypubs.army.mil. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  16. DoD Directive 1300.7; see also: “Return With Honor: Code of Conduct Training In the National Military Strategy Security Environment“ by Maj. Laura M. Ryan, Thesis NPS, September 2004
  17. 1 2
  18. “Personnel Recovery: Strategic Importance and Impact” by Pera, Miller, & Whitcomb, Air & Space Power Journal, Nov.–Dec. 2012, pp. 83-122 (A history of U.S. PR) at https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/ASPJ/journals/Volume-26_Issue-6/F-Pera-Miller-Whitcomb.pdf
  19. "US Air Force SERE Specialist Selection & Training". Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute. March 28, 2016.
  20. Sergeant, A. former Marine; Luckwaldt, Adam Luckwoldt served as Career Planner for 6th Communication Battalion in Brooklyn He’s written about military careers for The Balance Careers Read The Balance's editorial policies Adam. "USAF SERE Specialist Career Profile". The Balance Careers.
  21. "SERE: Water survival - preparing Airmen for the sea > Fairchild Air Force Base > Display". www.fairchild.af.mil.
  22. https://www.mountainhome.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2000608306/
  23. 1 2 FM 7-21.13 (“The Soldier's Guide”), p. 5-2
  24. 1 2 Press, Audrey McAvoy, The Associated (August 7, 2017). "Soldiers train for jungle warfare at Hawaii rainforest". Army Times.
  25. 1 2 Service, Marine Corps News. "What It's Like to Go Through Marine Corps SERE Training". The Balance Careers.
  26. "Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center > About > History". www.29palms.marines.mil.
  27. https://www.aircav.com/survival/asch07/asch07p01.html
  28. Lavender, Bill (July 26, 2019). "9 Improvised Survival Items That Could Save Your Life". SIGMA 3 Survival School. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  29. The release of a previously classified "PREAL" training guide provides detailed information-https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/338917-pre-academic-laboratory-preal-operating.html
  30. See "Evasion", pp. K-1 et seq. in JP 3-50 at https://fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp3_50.pdf
  31. "Navy Legend Vice Adm. Stockdale Led POW Resistance | The Sextant". usnhistory.navylive.dodlive.mil.
  32. Code of Conduct, Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) Training, U.S. Army Regulation 350-30, December 10, 1985
  33. USAFA 2010–2011 Contrails
  34. https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/GC_1949-III.pdf
  35. See “Lessons from the Hanoi Hilton: Six Characteristics of High Performance Teams” by Peter Fretwell, Taylor B. Kiland, Naval Institute Press (2013)
  36. "SURVIVING TORTURE | Philadelphia Inquirer | 06/07/2009". June 30, 2009. Archived from the original on June 30, 2009.
  37. "This Medal of Honor Recipient Was Executed for Singing "God Bless America"". March 27, 2018.
  38. https://usnhistory.navylive.dodlive.mil/2015/11/13/navy-legend-vice-adm-stockdale-led-pow-resistance/
  39. "What I've Learned Since College: An interview with R. Dale Storr :: Fall 2006 :: Washington State Magazine". wsm.wsu.edu.
  40. CARROLL, WARD. "What It's Like At The Training Camp Where US Troops Learn To Survive If They Are Captured". Business Insider.
  41. "Army Regulation 350–30: "Training Code of Conduct, Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE)"" (PDF).
  42. "Boot Camp — Today's Military". www.todaysmilitary.com.
  43. "SERE training develops leaders for complex environment". www.army.mil.
  44. AFM 64-3 "Survival Training Edition"(1977); NAVAER 00-80T-56, "SURVIVALTRAINING GUIDE" (1955)
  45. "SF SERE School". December 24, 2010.
  46. Nagpal, BM; Sharma, R (2004). "Cold Injuries : The Chill Within". Medical Journal, Armed Forces India. 60 (2): 165–171. doi:10.1016/S0377-1237(04)80111-4. PMC   4923033 .
  47. "Army Air Forces Survival on Land, at Sea". Training Aids Division. July 2, 1944 via Google Books.
  48. "Types of Deserts". pubs.usgs.gov.
  49. Zieliński, Jakub; Przybylski, Jacek (July 2, 2012). "[How much water is lost during breathing?]". Pneumonologia I Alergologia Polska. 80 (4): 339–342. PMID   22714078 via PubMed.
  50. "Why Jungle Warfare School was called a 'Green Hell'". Americas Military Entertainment Brand. February 1, 2018.
  51. "How to Survive in the Jungle". HowStuffWorks. August 4, 2008.
  52. Diab, Emma (April 11, 2016). "What Isolation Does to Your Brain (and How You Can Fight It)". Thrillist. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  53. Heckman, William (November 8, 2019). "Can stress kill you?".
  54. read, Dr Melissa Samartano Last updated: July 8, 2018 ~ 4 min (May 7, 2018). "The Stress Reaction Cycle". psychcentral.com.
  55. "Keeping Calm Under Pressure". Psychological Health Care. November 14, 2017.
  56. Lieblich, A. (1994). Seasons of Captivity: The Inner World of POWs. NYU Press. p. 3. ISBN   978-0-8147-5273-9 . Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  57. [ dead link ]
  58. 1 2 "Marines Learn Survival Skills in Scottish Highlands". U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. October 2, 2018. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  59. Personnel in United States Armed Forces major branches: U.S. Army 471,513, U.S. Navy 325,802, U.S. Air Force 323,222, U.S. Marine Corps 184,427
  60. "SERE". Thomas Solutions Inc.
  61. "Inside the SFQC | Special Forces Association".
  62. "CNN Programs - Presents". www.cnn.com.
  63. Survival, Evasion Resistance and Escape (SERE) Course (PHASE II SFQC), U.S. Army Special Operations Center of Excellence, last accessed April 22, 2017]
  64. SERE training develops leaders for complex environment, Army.mil, by CPT Erik Olsen, dated November 21, 2014, last accessed April 22, 2017
  65. "Resistance training". www.gd.com. July 2, 2020. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  66. https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/440625.pdf
  67. https://www.army.mil/article/170422/basic_military_mountaineering_course
  68. "U.S. Special Forces Alpine Warfare Guide". Secrets of Survival. August 5, 2019.
  69. "Lightning Academy :: U.S. Army Garrison Hawaii". home.army.mil.
  70. Tan, Michelle (August 7, 2017). "Army to launch new desert school". Army Times.
  71. "Desert Warfare: 20-Day Course Focuses on Small-Unit Tactics". Association of the United States Army. June 9, 2016.
  72. "Support services" (PDF). doni.documentservices.dla.mil. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  73. https://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmotc/nsti/Pages/ASTCNorfolk.aspx
  74. "Units". www.gosere.af.mil.
  75. "Home page of Fairchild Air Force Base". www.fairchild.af.mil.
  76. 1 2 "USAF Survival Evasion Resistance Escape | Baseops".
  77. "cool school". AIRMAN Magazine.
  78. [http://www.jbsa.mil/News/News/Article/1877894/sere-specialists-showcase-training-for-recruiters, SERE Specialists showcase training for recruits, AF.mil, by 1st Lt Kayshel Trudell, dated June 14, 2019, last accessed September 8, 2019]
  79. "USAFA Summer Training | Air Force ROTC". www.afrotc.msstate.edu.
  80. "Air Force Academy Changes Simulated Rape Training After Complaints". AP NEWS.
  81. "Air Force Special Tactics integrate into Marine Raider training". Air Force Special Tactics (24 SOW).
  82. "Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command > Units > Marine Raider Training Center > SERE". www.marsoc.marines.mil.
  83. "Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center > About > Mission". www.29palms.marines.mil.
  84. "Guide to MARSOC Training and Being a Marine Raider". Indeed Career Guide.
  85. Careers, Full Bio Rod Powers was the U. S. Military expert for The Balance; Powers, was a retired Air Force First Sergeant with 22 years of active duty service Read The Balance's editorial policies Rod. "How to Survive Marine Corps Basic Training". The Balance Careers.
  86. III, John B. Bellinger. "Obama, Bush, and the Geneva Conventions".
  87. "Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order | Articles of UCMJ". Gary Myers, Daniel Conway and Associates.
  88. https://www.justice.gov/file/18791/download
  89. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1068&context=lsrp_papers
  90. Windrem, Robert. "CIA Paid Torture Teachers More than $80 Million". NBC News. Archived from the original on December 9, 2014. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  91. Benjamin, Mark (June 29, 2006). "Torture teachers". Salon . Retrieved July 19, 2006.
  92. Hina Shamsi; Deborah Pearlstein, ed. "Command's Responsibility: Detainee Deaths in U.S. Custody in Iraq and Afghanistan: Abed Hamed Mowhoush" Archived August 15, 2006, at the Wayback Machine , Human Rights First, February 2006. Accessed August 4, 2008.
  93. https://books.google.com/books?id=W2aF6HlFPQoC&pg=PA220&lpg=PA220&dq=human+rights+first+death++Mowhoush+%22sere%22&source=bl&ots=rpkLjC-xj_&sig=ACfU3U0hxUFzlpevoeEnBWLU40RHVzygIg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirxsuVxa_qAhXdGDQIHUrgA04Q6AEwAHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=human%20rights%20first%20death%20%20Mowhoush%20%22sere%22&f=false pp. 219-221.
  94. Mark Mazzetti. "Ex-Pentagon Lawyers Face Inquiry on Interrogation Role". The New York Times , June 17, 2008.
  95. Kleinman, Steven. "Officer: Military Demanded Torture Lessons". CBS News, July 25, 2008.
  96. Rice, Condoleezza (September 26, 2008). "Rice admits Bush officials held White House talks on CIA interrogations". Los Angeles Times .
  97. Beutler, Brian (April 24, 2009). "Senate Report Accidentally Reveals SERE Instructors Trained CIA Officials In Torture". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  98. "CIA Paid Torture Teachers More Than $80 Million". NBC News.
  99. "Shawn Vestal: $80 million paid to Spokane firm for enhanced interrogation". www.spokesman.com.
  100. "Fairchild's torture ties extend their reach". www.spokesman.com.
  101. See also: Report of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG): "Review of DoD-Directed Investigations of Detainee Abuse" (2006) at https://media.defense.gov/2016/May/19/2001774103/-1/-1/1/06-INTEL-10.pdf.
  102. "Abuse At Abu Ghraib". www.cbsnews.com.
  103. In sworn depositions, Mitchell states unequivocally and repeatedly that he didn't "design" or "develop" the North Korean/Chinese/Vietnamese techniques that he sold to the CIA (which became the basis for the "enhanced interrogation techniques"). See https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/176-1.-Exhibit-1.pdf
  104. "Officer 'Unpopular' For Opposing Interrogations". NPR.org.
  105. "It is both illegal and deeply unethical to use techniques that profoundly disrupt someone’s personality" Leonard S. Rubenstein, the executive director of Physicians for Human Rights from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2005/07/11/the-experiment-3
  106. "National Security Experts on Torture Report". Human Rights First.
  107. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/912/1384/1986359/
  108. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ppmjnn/the-uss-overlook-torture-scandal-from-1995-sere-solomon-hughes-109
  109. https://apnews.com/6a9504b154464b4bb96a3064b9a14fbd
  110. https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1995/apr/08/air-force-to-tone-down-training-role-playing-to/
  111. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/military-sere-waterboarding-banned-torture-cia-gina-haspel_n_5abd1240e4b06409775e4122
  112. https://shadowproof.com/2010/04/05/internal-memo-exposes-yoo-and-rove-lies-on-safety-of-waterboarding/
  113. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdf/JPRA-Memo_042409.pdf
  114. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2009/01/the-military-should-close-its-torture-school-i-know-because-i-graduated-from-it.html
  115. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdf/JPRA-Memo_042409.pdf

Further reading