Morse code

For other uses, see Morse Code (disambiguation).

Chart of the Morse code 26 letters and 10 numerals

This Morse key was originally used by Gotthard railway, later by a shortwave radio amateur

Morse code is a telecommunications method which encodes text characters as standardized sequences of two different signal durations, called dots and dashes, or dits and dahs. ^{[3] [4]} Morse code is named after Samuel Morse, one of the early developers of the system adopted for electrical telegraphy.

International Morse code encodes the 26  basic Latin letters A to Z, one accented Latin letter (É), the Arabic numerals, and a small set of punctuation and procedural signals (prosigns). There is no distinction between upper and lower case letters. ^[1] Each Morse code symbol is formed by a sequence of dits and dahs. The dit duration can vary for signal clarity and operator skill, but for any one message, once established it is the basic unit of time measurement in Morse code. The duration of a dah is three times the duration of a dit (although some telegraphers deliberately exaggerate the length of a dah for clearer signalling). Each dit or dah within an encoded character is followed by a period of signal absence, called a space, equal to the dit duration. The letters of a word are separated by a space of duration equal to three dits, and words are separated by a space equal to seven dits. ^{[1] [5] [a]}

Morse code can be memorized and sent in a form perceptible to the human senses, e.g. via sound waves or visible light, such that it can be directly interpreted by persons trained in the skill. ^{[7] [8]} Morse code is usually transmitted by on-off keying of an information-carrying medium such as electric current, radio waves, visible light, or sound waves. ^{[9] [10]} The current or wave is present during the time period of the dit or dah and absent during the time between dits and dahs. ^{[11] [12]}

Since many natural languages use more than the 26 letters of the Latin alphabet, Morse alphabets have been developed for those languages, largely by transliteration of existing codes. ^[13]

To increase the efficiency of transmission, Morse code was originally designed so that the duration of each symbol is approximately inverse to the frequency of occurrence of the character that it represents in text of the English language. Thus the most common letter in English, the letter E, has the shortest code – a single dit. Because the Morse code elements are specified by proportion rather than specific time durations, the code is usually transmitted at the highest rate that the receiver is capable of decoding. Morse code transmission rate (speed) is specified in groups per minute, commonly referred to as words per minute. ^{[b] [7]}

Development and history

Pre-Morse telegraphs and codes

Single needle telegraph instrument

Early in the nineteenth century, European experimenters made progress with electrical signaling systems, using a variety of techniques including static electricity and electricity from Voltaic piles producing electrochemical and electromagnetic changes. These experimental designs were precursors to practical telegraphic applications. ^[14]

Telegraph key and sounder; the signal is "on" when the knob is pressed, and "off" when it is released, length and timing of the dits and dahs are entirely controlled by the telegraphist

Following the discovery of electromagnetism by Hans Christian Ørsted in 1820 and the invention of the electromagnet by William Sturgeon in 1824, there were developments in electromagnetic telegraphy in Europe and America. Pulses of electric current were sent along wires to control an electromagnet in the receiving instrument. Many of the earliest telegraph systems used a single-needle system which gave a very simple and robust instrument. However, it was slow, as the receiving operator had to alternate between looking at the needle and writing down the message. In Morse code, a deflection of the needle to the left corresponded to a dit and a deflection to the right to a dah. ^[15] The needle clicked each time it moved to the right or left. By making the two clicks sound different (by installing one ivory and one metal stop), transmissions on the single needle device became audible as well as visible, which led in turn to the Double Plate Sounder System. ^[16]

William Cooke and Charles Wheatstone in Britain developed an electrical telegraph that used electromagnets in its receivers. They obtained an English patent in June 1837 and demonstrated it on the London and Birmingham Railway, making it the first commercial telegraph. Carl Friedrich Gauss and Wilhelm Eduard Weber (1833) as well as Carl August von Steinheil (1837) used codes with varying word lengths for their telegraph systems. ^[17] In 1841, Cooke and Wheatstone built a telegraph that printed the letters from a wheel of typefaces struck by a hammer. ^{[18] : 79}

Samuel Morse and Alfred Vail

Morse code receiver that records on paper tape

The American artist Samuel Morse, the American physicist Joseph Henry, and mechanical engineer Alfred Vail developed an electrical telegraph system. The simple "on or off" nature of its signals made it desirable to find a method of transmitting natural language using only electrical pulses and the silence between them. Around 1837, Morse therefore developed such a method, an early forerunner to the modern International Morse code. ^{[18] : 79}

The Morse system for telegraphy, which was first used in about 1844, was designed to make indentations on a paper tape when electric currents were received. Morse's original telegraph receiver used a mechanical clockwork to move a paper tape. When an electrical current was received, an electromagnet engaged an armature that pushed a stylus onto the moving paper tape, making an indentation on the tape. When the current was interrupted, a spring retracted the stylus and that portion of the moving tape remained unmarked. Morse code was developed so that operators could translate the indentations marked on the paper tape into text messages.

In his earliest design for a code, Morse had planned to transmit only numerals, and to use a codebook to look up each word according to the number which had been sent. However, the code was soon expanded by Alfred Vail in 1840 to include letters and special characters, so it could be used more generally. Vail estimated the frequency of use of letters in the English language by counting the movable type he found in the type-cases of a local newspaper in Morristown, New Jersey. ^{[18] : 84} The shorter marks were called "dots" and the longer ones "dashes", and the letters most commonly used were assigned the shortest sequences of dots and dashes. This code, first used in 1844, was what later became known as Morse landline code, American Morse code , or Railroad Morse, until the end of railroad telegraphy in the U.S. in the 1970s.^{[ citation needed ]}

Operator-led change from graphical to audible code

In the original Morse telegraph system, the receiver's armature made a clicking noise as it moved in and out of position to mark the paper tape. Early telegraph operators soon learned that they could translate the clicks directly into dots and dashes, and write these down by hand, thus making the paper tape unnecessary. When Morse code was adapted to radio communication, the dots and dashes were sent as short and long tone pulses.

Later telegraphy training found that people become more proficient at receiving Morse code when it is taught "like a language", with each code perceived as a whole "word" instead of a sequence of separate dots and dashes, such as might be shown on a page. ^[19]

With the advent of tones produced by radiotelegraph receivers, the operators began to vocalize a dot as dit, and a dash as dah, to reflect the sounds of Morse code they heard. To conform to normal sending speed, dits which are not the last element of a code became voiced as di. For example, the letter L (  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ) is voiced as di dah di dit. ^{[20] [21]} Morse code was sometimes facetiously known as "iddy-umpty", a dit lampooned as "iddy" and a dah as "umpty", leading to the word "umpteen". ^[22]

Comparison of historical versions of Morse code with the current standard. Left: Later American Morse code from 1844. Center: The modified and rationalized version used by Friedrich Gerke on German railways. Right: Current ITU standard.

Gerke's refinement of Morse's code

The Morse code, as specified in the current international standard, International Morse Code Recommendation, ITU-R  M.1677-1, ^[1] was derived from a much-improved proposal by Friedrich Gerke in 1848 that became known as the "Hamburg alphabet", its only real defect being the use of an excessively long code (  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  and later the equal duration code   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ) for the frequently used vowel O.

Gerke changed many of the codepoints, in the process doing away with the different length dashes and different inter-element spaces of American Morse, leaving only two coding elements, the dot and the dash. Codes for German umlauted vowels and CH were introduced. Gerke's code was adopted in Germany and Austria in 1851. ^[23]

This finally led to the International Morse code in 1865. The International Morse code adopted most of Gerke's codepoints. The codes for O and P were taken from a code system developed by Steinheil. A new codepoint was added for J since Gerke did not distinguish between I and J. Changes were also made to X, Y, and Z. This left only four codepoints identical to the original Morse code, namely E, H, K and N, and the latter two had their dahs extended to full length. The original American code being compared dates to 1838; the later American code shown in the table was developed in 1844. ^[17]

Radiotelegraphy and aviation

In the 1890s, Morse code began to be used extensively for early radio communication before it was possible to transmit voice. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, most high-speed international communication used Morse code on telegraph lines, undersea cables, and radio circuits.

Although previous transmitters were bulky and the spark gap system of transmission was dangerous and difficult to use, there had been some early attempts: In 1910, the U.S. Navy experimented with sending Morse from an airplane. ^[24] However the first regular aviation radiotelegraphy was on airships, which had space to accommodate the large, heavy radio equipment then in use. The same year, 1910, a radio on the airship America was instrumental in coordinating the rescue of its crew. ^[25]

During World War I, Zeppelin airships equipped with radio were used for bombing and naval scouting, ^[26] and ground-based radio direction finders were used for airship navigation. ^[26] Allied airships and military aircraft also made some use of radiotelegraphy.

However, there was little aeronautical radio in general use during World War I, and in the 1920s, there was no radio system used by such important flights as that of Charles Lindbergh from New York to Paris in 1927. Once he and the Spirit of St. Louis were off the ground, Lindbergh was truly incommunicado and alone. Morse code in aviation began regular use in the mid-1920s. By 1928, when the first airplane flight was made by the Southern Cross from California to Australia, one of its four crewmen was a radio operator who communicated with ground stations via radio telegraph.

Beginning in the 1930s, both civilian and military pilots were required to be able to use Morse code, both for use with early communications systems and for identification of navigational beacons that transmitted continuous two- or three-letter identifiers in Morse code. Aeronautical charts show the identifier of each navigational aid next to its location on the map.

In addition, rapidly moving field armies could not have fought effectively without radiotelegraphy; they moved more quickly than their communications services could put up new telegraph and telephone lines. This was seen especially in the blitzkrieg offensives of the Nazi German Wehrmacht in Poland, Belgium, France (in 1940), the Soviet Union, and in North Africa; by the British Army in North Africa, Italy, and the Netherlands; and by the U.S. Army in France and Belgium (in 1944), and in southern Germany in 1945.

Maritime flash telegraphy and radio telegraphy

A U.S. Navy Morse Code training class in 2015. The sailors will use their new skills to collect signals intelligence.

Radiotelegraphy using Morse code was vital during World War II, especially in carrying messages between the warships and the naval bases of the belligerents. Long-range ship-to-ship communication was by radio telegraphy, using encrypted messages because the voice radio systems on ships then were quite limited in both their range and their security. Radiotelegraphy was also extensively used by warplanes, especially by long-range patrol planes that were sent out by navies to scout for enemy warships, cargo ships, and troop ships.

Morse code was used as an international standard for maritime distress until 1999 when it was replaced by the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System. When the French Navy ceased using Morse code on January 31, 1997, the final message transmitted was "Calling all. This is our last call before our eternal silence." ^[27]

Demise of commercial telegraphy

In the United States the final commercial Morse code transmission was on July 12, 1999, signing off with Samuel Morse's original 1844 message, WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT, and the prosign SK ("end of contact"). ^[28]

As of 2015 ^[update] , the United States Air Force still trains ten people a year in Morse. ^[29]

The United States Coast Guard has ceased all use of Morse code on the radio, and no longer monitors any radio frequencies for Morse code transmissions, including the international medium frequency (MF) distress frequency of 500 kHz. ^[30] However, the Federal Communications Commission still grants commercial radiotelegraph operator licenses to applicants who pass its code and written tests. ^[31] Licensees have reactivated the old California coastal Morse station KPH and regularly transmit from the site under either this call sign or as KSM. Similarly, a few U.S. museum ship stations are operated by Morse enthusiasts. ^[32]

Operator proficiency

A commercially manufactured iambic paddle used in conjunction with an electronic keyer to generate high-speed Morse code, the timing of which is controlled by the electronic keyer.

Morse code speed is measured in words per minute (WPM) or characters per minute (CPM). Characters have differing lengths because they contain differing numbers of dits and dahs. Consequently, words also have different lengths in terms of dot duration, even when they contain the same number of characters. For this reason, some standard word is adopted for measuring operators' transmission speeds: Two such standard words in common use are PARIS and CODEX. ^[33] Operators skilled in Morse code can often understand ("copy") code in their heads at rates in excess of 40 WPM.

In addition to knowing, understanding, and being able to copy the standard written alpha-numeric and punctuation characters or symbols at high speeds, skilled high-speed operators must also be fully knowledgeable of all of the special unwritten Morse code symbols for the standard Prosigns for Morse code and the meanings of these special procedural signals in standard Morse code communications protocol.

International contests in code copying are still occasionally held. In July 1939 at a contest in Asheville, North Carolina in the United States Ted R. McElroy (W1JYN) set a still-standing record for Morse copying, 75.2 WPM. ^[34] Pierpont (2004) also notes that some operators may have passed 100 WPM. ^[34] By this time, they are "hearing" phrases and sentences rather than words. The fastest speed ever sent by a straight key was achieved in 1942 by Harry Turner (W9YZE) (d. 1992) who reached 35 WPM in a demonstration at a U.S. Army base. To accurately compare code copying speed records of different eras it is useful to keep in mind that different standard words (50 dit durations versus 60 dit durations) and different interword gaps (5 dit durations versus 7 dit durations) may have been used when determining such speed records. For example, speeds run with the CODEX standard word and the PARIS standard may differ by up to 20%.

Today among amateur operators there are several organizations that recognize high-speed code ability, one group consisting of those who can copy Morse at 60 WPM. ^[35] Also, Certificates of Code Proficiency are issued by several amateur radio societies, including the American Radio Relay League. Their basic award starts at 10 WPM with endorsements as high as 40 WPM, and are available to anyone who can copy the transmitted text. Members of the Boy Scouts of America may put a Morse interpreter's strip on their uniforms if they meet the standards for translating code at 5 WPM.

A U.S. Navy signalman sends Morse code signals in 2005.

Through May 2013, the First, Second, and Third Class (commercial) Radiotelegraph Licenses using code tests based upon the CODEX standard word were still being issued in the United States by the Federal Communications Commission. The First Class license required 20 WPM code group and 25 WPM text code proficiency, the others 16 WPM code group test (five letter blocks sent as simulation of receiving encrypted text) and 20 WPM code text (plain language) test. It was also necessary to pass written tests on operating practice and electronics theory. A unique additional demand for the First Class was a requirement of a year of experience for operators of shipboard and coast stations using Morse. This allowed the holder to be chief operator on board a passenger ship. However, since 1999 the use of satellite and very high-frequency maritime communications systems (GMDSS) has made them obsolete. (By that point meeting experience requirement for the First was very difficult.)

Currently, only one class of license, the Radiotelegraph Operator License, is issued. This is granted either when the tests are passed or as the Second and First are renewed and become this lifetime license. For new applicants, it requires passing a written examination on electronic theory and radiotelegraphy practices, as well as 16 WPM code-group and 20 WPM text tests. However, the code exams are currently waived for holders of Amateur Extra Class licenses who obtained their operating privileges under the old 20 WPM test requirement.

International Morse code

Morse codes of one version or another have been in use for more than 160 years — longer than any other electrical message encoding system. What is called Morse code today is actually somewhat different from what was originally developed by Vail and Morse. The Modern International Morse code, or continental code, was created by Friedrich Clemens Gerke in 1848 and initially used for telegraphy between Hamburg and Cuxhaven in Germany. Gerke changed nearly half of the alphabet and all of the numerals, providing the foundation for the modern form of the code. After some minor changes to the letters and a complete revision of the numerals, International Morse Code was standardized by the International Telegraphy Congress in 1865 in Paris, and later became the standard adopted by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Morse and Vail's final code specification, however, was only really used only for land-line telegraphy in the United States and Canada, with the International code used everywhere else, including all ships at sea and sailing in North American waters. Morse's version became known as American Morse code or railroad code, and is now almost never used, with the possible exception of historical re-enactments.

Aviation

Cayo Largo Del Sur VOR-DME

In aviation, pilots use radio navigation aids. To allow pilots to ensure that the stations they intend to use are serviceable, the stations transmit a set of identification letters (usually a two-to-five-letter version of the station name) in Morse code. Station identification letters are shown on air navigation charts. For example, the VOR-DME based at Vilo Acuña Airport in Cayo Largo del Sur, Cuba is identified by "UCL", and Morse code UCL is repeatedly transmitted on its radio frequency.

In some countries, during periods of maintenance, the facility may instead transmit the signal TEST (  ▄▄▄   ▄   ▄ ▄ ▄   ▄▄▄ ), or the identification may be removed, which tells pilots and navigators that the station is unreliable. In Canada, the identification is removed entirely to signify the navigation aid is not to be used. ^{[36] [37]}

In the aviation service, Morse is typically sent at a very slow speed of about 5 words per minute. In the U.S., pilots do not actually have to know Morse to identify the transmitter because the dot/dash sequence is written out next to the transmitter's symbol on aeronautical charts. Some modern navigation receivers automatically translate the code into displayed letters.

The sound of non-directional beacon WG, on 248 kHz, located at 49.8992 North, 97.349197 West, ^[38] near Winnipeg's main airport

Amateur radio

Vibroplex brand semiautomatic key (informally called a "bug" since it vaguely resembles a stick insect).

International Morse code today is most popular among amateur radio operators, in the mode commonly referred to as "continuous wave" or "CW". ^[e] Other, faster keying methods are available in radio telegraphy, such as frequency-shift keying (FSK).

The original amateur radio operators used Morse code exclusively since voice-capable radio transmitters did not become commonly available until around 1920. Until 2003, the International Telecommunication Union mandated Morse code proficiency as part of the amateur radio licensing procedure worldwide. However, the World Radiocommunication Conference of 2003 made the Morse code requirement for amateur radio licensing optional. ^[39] Many countries subsequently removed the Morse requirement from their license requirements. ^[40]

Morse code recorded on the 40 meter ham radio band (31 sec).

Until 1991, a demonstration of the ability to send and receive Morse code at a minimum of five words per minute (WPM) was required to receive an amateur radio license for use in the United States from the Federal Communications Commission. Demonstration of this ability was still required for the privilege to use the shortwave bands. Until 2000, proficiency at the 20 WPM level was required to receive the highest level of amateur license (Amateur Extra Class); effective April 15, 2000, in the FCC reduced the Extra Class requirement to 5 WPM. ^[41] Finally, effective on February 23, 2007, the FCC eliminated the Morse code proficiency requirements from all amateur radio licenses.

While voice and data transmissions are limited to specific amateur radio bands under U.S. rules, Morse code is permitted on all amateur bands: LF, MF low, MF high, HF, VHF, and UHF. In some countries, certain portions of the amateur radio bands are reserved for transmission of Morse code signals only.

Because Morse code transmissions employ an on-off keyed radio signal, it requires less complex equipment than other radio transmission modes. Morse code also uses less bandwidth (typically only 100–150  Hz wide, although only for a slow data rate) than voice communication (roughly 2,400~2,800 Hz used by SSB voice).

Morse code is usually received as a high-pitched audio tone, so transmissions are easier to copy than voice through the noise on congested frequencies, and it can be used in very high noise / low signal environments. The fact that the transmitted power is concentrated into a very limited bandwidth makes it possible to use narrow receiver filters, which suppress or eliminate interference on nearby frequencies. The narrow signal bandwidth also takes advantage of the natural aural selectivity of the human brain, further enhancing weak signal readability.^{[ citation needed ]} This efficiency makes CW extremely useful for DX (long distance) transmissions, as well as for low-power transmissions (commonly called "QRP operation", from the Q-code for "reduce power"). There are several amateur clubs that require solid high speed copy, the highest of these has a standard of 60 WPM. The American Radio Relay League offers a code proficiency certification program that starts at 10 WPM.

The relatively limited speed at which Morse code can be sent led to the development of an extensive number of abbreviations to speed communication. These include prosigns, Q codes, and a set of Morse code abbreviations for typical message components. For example, CQ is broadcast to be interpreted as "seek you" (I'd like to converse with anyone who can hear my signal). The abbreviations OM (old man), YL (young lady), and XYL ("ex-young lady" – wife) are common. YL or OM is used by an operator when referring to the other operator (regardless of their actual age), and XYL or OM (rather than the expected XYM) is used by an operator when referring to his or her spouse. QTH is "transmitting location" (spoken "my Q.T.H." is "my location"). The use of abbreviations for common terms permits conversation even when the operators speak different languages.

Although the traditional telegraph key (straight key) is still used by some amateurs, the use of mechanical semi-automatic keyers ^[d] (informally called "bugs"), and of fully automatic electronic keyers (called "single paddle" and either "double-paddle" or "iambic" keys) is prevalent today. Software is also frequently employed to produce and decode Morse code radio signals. The ARRL has a readability standard for robot encoders called ARRL Farnsworth spacing ^[42] that is supposed to have higher readability for both robot and human decoders. Some programs like WinMorse ^[43] have implemented the standard.

Other uses

Radio navigation aids such as VORs and NDBs for aeronautical use broadcast identifying information in the form of Morse Code, though many VOR stations now also provide voice identification. ^[44] Warships, including those of the U.S. Navy, have long used signal lamps to exchange messages in Morse code. Modern use continues, in part, as a way to communicate while maintaining radio silence.

Automatic Transmitter Identification System (ATIS) uses Morse code to identify uplink sources of analog satellite transmissions.

Many amateur radio repeaters identify with Morse, even though they are used for voice communications.

Applications for the general public

Representation of Morse code SOS

An important application is signalling for help through SOS, "  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ". This can be sent many ways: keying a radio on and off, flashing a mirror, toggling a flashlight, and similar methods. The SOS signal is not sent as three separate characters; rather, it is a prosign SOS, and is keyed without gaps between characters. ^[45]

Morse code as an assistive technology

Morse code has been employed as an assistive technology, helping people with a variety of disabilities to communicate. ^{[46] [47] [f] [49]} For example, the Android operating system versions 5.0 and higher allow users to input text using Morse Code as an alternative to a keypad or handwriting recognition. ^[50]

Morse can be sent by persons with severe motion disabilities, as long as they have some minimal motor control. An original solution to the problem that caretakers have to learn to decode has been an electronic typewriter with the codes written on the keys. Codes were sung by users; see the voice typewriter employing Morse or votem. ^[51]

Morse code can also be translated by computer and used in a speaking communication aid. In some cases, this means alternately blowing into and sucking on a plastic tube ("sip-and-puff" interface). An important advantage of Morse code over row column scanning is that once learned, it does not require looking at a display. Also, it appears faster than scanning.

In one case reported in the radio amateur magazine QST , ^[52] an old shipboard radio operator who had a stroke and lost the ability to speak or write could communicate with his physician (a radio amateur) by blinking his eyes in Morse. Two examples of communication in intensive care units were also published in QST magazine . ^{[53] [54]} Another example occurred in 1966 when prisoner of war Jeremiah Denton, brought on television by his North Vietnamese captors, Morse-blinked the word TORTURE. In these two cases, interpreters were available to understand those series of eye-blinks.

Representation, timing, and speeds

International Morse code is composed of five elements: ^{[1] : §3}

1. short mark, dot or dit (  ▄ ): "dit duration" is one time unit long
2. long mark, dash or dah (  ▄▄▄ ): three time units long
3. inter-element gap between the dits and dahs within a character: one dot duration or one unit long
4. short gap (between letters): three time units long
5. medium gap (between words): seven time units long (formerly five ^[6] )

Transmission

Morse code can be transmitted in a number of ways: Originally as electrical pulses along a telegraph wire, but later extended to an audio tone, a radio signal with short and long tones, or high and low tones, or as a mechanical, audible, or visual signal (e.g. a flashing light) using devices like an Aldis lamp or a heliograph, a common flashlight, or even a car horn. Some mine rescues have used pulling on a rope - a short pull for a dot and a long pull for a dah. Ground forces send messages to aircraft with panel signalling, where a horizontal panel is a dah and a vertical panel a dit. ^[55]

Morse messages are generally transmitted by a hand-operated device such as a telegraph key, so there are variations introduced by the skill of the sender and receiver — more experienced operators can send and receive at faster speeds. In addition, individual operators differ slightly, for example, using slightly longer or shorter dahs or gaps, perhaps only for particular characters. This is called their "fist", and experienced operators can recognize specific individuals by it alone. A good operator who sends clearly and is easy to copy is said to have a "good fist". A "poor fist" is a characteristic of sloppy or hard to copy Morse code.

Digital storage

Morse code is transmitted using just two states (on and off). Morse code may be represented as a binary code, and that is what telegraph operators do when transmitting messages. Working from the above ITU definition and further defining a bit as a dot time, a Morse code sequence may be crudely represented a combination of the following five bit-strings:

1. short mark, dot or dit (  ▄ ): '1'b
2. longer mark, dash or dah (  ▄▄▄ ): '111'b
3. intra-character gap (between the dits and dahs within a character): 0
4. short gap (between letters): '000'b
5. medium gap (between words): '0000000'b

The marks and gaps alternate: Dits and dahs are always separated by one of the gaps, and that the gaps are always separated by a dit or a dah.

A more efficient binary encoding uses only two-bits for each dit or dah element, with the 1 dit-length pause that must follow after each automatically included for every 2 bit code. One possible coding is by number value for the length of signal tone sent one could use '01'b for a dit and the automatic single-dit pause after it, and '11'b for a dah and the automatic single-dit following pause, and '00'b for the extra pause between letters (in effect, an end-of-letter mark). That leaves the code '10'b available for some other purpose, such as an escape character, or to more compactly represent the extra space between words (an end-of-word mark) instead of '00 00 00'b (only 6 dit lengths, since the 7th is automatically inserted as part of the prior dit or dah). Although the dit and inter-letter pauses work out to be the same, for any letter containing a dah, the two-bit encoding uses digital memory more compactly than the direct-conversion bit strings mentioned above. Including the letter-separating spaces, all International Morse letter codes pack into 12 bits or less (5 symbols), and most fit into 10 bits or less (4 symbols); most of the procedural signs fit into 14 bits, with a few only needing 12 bits (5 symbols); and all digits require exactly 12 bits.

For example, Morse G (  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  + 2 extra empty dits for "end of letter") would binary-encode as '11'b, '11'b, '01'b, '00'b; when packed it is '1111 0100'b = 'F4'x, which stores into only one byte (two nibbles) (as does every three-element code). The bit encoding for the longer method mentioned earlier the same letter would encode as '1110'b, '1110'b, '1000'b = '1110 1110 1000'b = 'EE8'x, or one-and-a-half bytes (three nibbles). The space saving allows small devices, like portable memory keyers, to have more and longer International Morse code sequences in small, conventional device-driver microprocessors' RAM chips.

Cable code

The very long time constants of 19th and early 20th century submarine communications cables required a different form of Morse signalling. Instead of keying a voltage on and off for varying times, the dits and dahs were represented by two polarities of voltage impressed on the cable, for a uniform time. ^[56]

Timing

Below is an illustration of timing conventions. The phrase MORSE CODE, in Morse code format, would normally be written something like this, where – represents dahs and · represents dits:

 −− −−− ·−· ··· ·       −·−· −−− −·· ·  M   O   R   S  E        C    O   D  E 

Next is the exact conventional timing for this phrase, with  ▓ representing "signal on", and ˽ representing "signal off", each for the time length of exactly one dit:

          1         2         3         4         5         6         7         8  12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789     ———M———   —————O—————   ———R———   ——S——   E       —————C—————   —————O—————   ———D———   E     ▓▓▓˽▓▓▓˽˽˽▓▓▓˽▓▓▓˽▓▓▓˽˽˽▓˽▓▓▓˽▓˽˽˽▓˽▓˽▓˽˽˽▓˽˽˽˽˽˽˽▓▓▓˽▓˽▓▓▓˽▓˽˽˽▓▓▓˽▓▓▓˽▓▓▓˽˽˽▓▓▓˽▓˽▓˽˽˽▓      ↑           ↑        ↑       ↑             ↑      |          dah      dit      |             |  symbol space                letter space    word space 

Spoken representation

Morse code is often spoken or written with dah for dashes, dit for dots located at the end of a character, and di for dots located at the beginning or internally within the character. Thus, the following Morse code sequence:

M   O   R   S  E          C    O   D  E −− −−− ·−· ··· · (space) −·−· −−− −·· · 

is spoken (or sung):

Dah dah   dah dah dah   di dah dit   di di dit   dit,     Dah di dah dit   dah dah dah   dah di dit   dit.

For use on radio, there is little point in learning to read written Morse as above; rather, the sounds of all of the letters and symbols need to be learned, for both sending and receiving.

Speed in words per minute

All Morse code elements depend on the dot / dit length. A dah is the length of 3 dits (with no gaps between), and spacings are specified in number of dit lengths. An unambiguous method of specifying the transmission speed is to specify the dit duration as, for example, 50 milliseconds.

Specifying the dit duration is, however, not the common practice. Usually, speeds are stated in words per minute. That introduces ambiguity because words have different numbers of characters, and characters have different dit lengths. It is not immediately clear how a specific word rate determines the dit duration in milliseconds.

Some method to standardize the transformation of a word rate to a dit duration is useful. A simple way to do this is to choose a dit duration that would send a typical word the desired number of times in one minute. If, for example, the operator wanted a character speed of 13 words per minute, the operator would choose a dit rate that would send the typical word 13 times in exactly one minute.

The typical word thus determines the dit length. It is common to assume that a word is 5 characters long. There are two common typical words: PARIS and CODEX. PARIS mimics a word rate that is typical of natural language words and reflects the benefits of Morse code's shorter code durations for common characters such as E and T. CODEX offers a word rate that is typical of 5 letter code groups (sequences of random letters). Using the word PARIS as a standard, the number of dit units is 50 and a simple calculation shows that the dit length at 20 words per minute is 60 milliseconds. Using the word CODEX with 60 dit units, the dit length at 20 words per minute is 50 milliseconds.

Because Morse code is usually sent by hand, it is unlikely that an operator could be that precise with the dit length, and the individual characteristics and preferences of the operators usually override the standards.

For commercial radiotelegraph licenses in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission specifies tests for Morse code proficiency in words per minute and in code groups per minute. ^{[57] : §13.207(c), §13.209(d)} The FCC specifies that a "word" is 5 characters long. The Commission specifies Morse code test elements at 16 code groups per minute, 20 words per minute, 20 code groups per minute, and 25 words per minute. ^{[57] : §13.203(b)} The word per minute rate would be close to the PARIS standard, and the code groups per minute would be close to the CODEX standard.

While the Federal Communications Commission no longer requires Morse code for amateur radio licenses, the old requirements were similar to the requirements for commercial radiotelegraph licenses. ^{[57] : §97.503, 1996}

A difference between amateur radio licenses and commercial radiotelegraph licenses is that commercial operators must be able to receive code groups of random characters along with plain language text. For each class of license, the code group speed requirement is slower than the plain language text requirement. For example, for the Radiotelegraph Operator License, the examinee must pass a 20 word per minute plain text test and a 16 word per minute code group test. ^[31]

Based upon a 50 dit duration standard word such as PARIS, the time for one dit duration or one unit can be computed by the formula:

${\displaystyle ~T={\frac {\,1,200\,}{W}}~}$

where: T is the unit time, or dit duration in milliseconds, and W is the speed in WPM.

High-speed telegraphy contests are held; according to the Guinness Book of Records in June 2005 at the International Amateur Radio Union's 6th World Championship in High Speed Telegraphy in Primorsko, Bulgaria, Andrei Bindasov of Belarus transmitted 230 Morse code marks of mixed text in one minute. ^[58]

Farnsworth speed

Sometimes, especially while teaching Morse code, the timing rules above are changed so two different speeds are used: A character speed and a text speed. The character speed is how fast each individual letter is sent. The text speed is how fast the entire message is sent. For example, individual characters may be sent at a 13 words-per-minute rate, but the intercharacter and interword gaps may be lengthened so the word rate is only 5 words per minute.

Using different character and text speeds is, in fact, a common practice, and is used in the Farnsworth method of learning Morse code.

Alternative display of common characters in International Morse code

See also: Huffman coding

Some methods of teaching Morse code use a dichotomic search table.

International Morse code binary search tree: The graph branches left for each dit and right for each dah until the character representation is reached. Official ITU codes are shown as black letters on dark grey, and are complete, including punctuation; a few non-ITU extensions are shown in grey letters on light grey, but many others are left out. ITU prosigns are circled in red with red text and are complete; unofficial prosigns are orange and are mostly complete.

Learning methods

People learning Morse code using the Farnsworth method are taught to send and receive letters and other symbols at their full target speed, that is with normal relative timing of the dits, dahs, and spaces within each symbol for that speed. The Farnsworth method is named for Donald R. "Russ" Farnsworth, also known by his call sign, W6TTB. However, initially exaggerated spaces between symbols and words are used, to give "thinking time" to make the sound "shape" of the letters and symbols easier to learn. The spacing can then be reduced with practice and familiarity.

Another popular teaching method is the Koch method, invented in 1935 by the German engineer and former stormtrooper Ludwig Koch, ^[59] which uses the full target speed from the outset but begins with just two characters. Once strings containing those two characters can be copied with 90% accuracy, an additional character is added, and so on until the full character set is mastered.

In North America, many thousands of individuals have increased their code recognition speed (after initial memorization of the characters) by listening to the regularly scheduled code practice transmissions broadcast by W1AW, the American Radio Relay League's headquarters station. ^[60] As of 2015, ^[update] the United States military taught Morse code as an 81-day self-paced course, having phased out more traditional classes. ^[61]

Mnemonics

Main article: Morse code mnemonics

Scout movement founder Baden-Powell's mnemonic chart from 1918

Visual mnemonic charts have been devised over the ages. Baden-Powell included one in the Girl Guides handbook ^[62] in 1918.

In the United Kingdom, many people learned the Morse code by means of a series of words or phrases that have the same rhythm as a Morse character. For instance, Q in Morse is dah dah di dah , which can be memorized by the phrase "God Save the Queen", and the Morse for F is di di dah dit , which can be memorized as "Did she like it?" ^[g]

Letters, numbers, punctuation, prosigns for Morse code and non-Latin variants

Category	Character	Code
Letters	A, a	▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	B, b	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	C, c	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	D, d	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	E, e	▄  ⓘ
Letters	F, f	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	G, g	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	H, h	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	I, i	▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	J, j	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	K, k Prosign for general invitation to transmit	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	L, l	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	M, m	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	N, n	▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	O, o	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	P, p	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	Q, q	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	R, r	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	S, s	▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Letters	T, t	▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	U, u	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	V, v	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	W, w	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	X, x	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	Y, y	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Letters	Z, z	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Numbers	0	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Numbers	1	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Numbers	2	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Numbers	3	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Numbers	4	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Numbers	5	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Numbers	6	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Numbers	7	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Numbers	8	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Numbers	9	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Period [.]	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Comma [,]	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Question mark [?]	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Apostrophe [']	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Nonstandard punctuation [h]	Exclamation point [!] KW digraph	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Slash or Fraction bar [/] DN digraph	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Open parenthesis [(] KN digraph   Unofficial prosign for exclusive invitation to transmit	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Close parenthesis [)] KK digraph	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Nonstandard punctuation [h]	Ampersand [&] [i] AS digraph   Prosign for wait	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Colon [:]	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Nonstandard punctuation [h]	Semicolon [;]	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Double dash [=] BT digraph   Prosign for new section or new paragraph	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Plus sign [+] RN digraph   Prosign for new message or new page	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Hyphen or Minus sign [-]	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Nonstandard punctuation [h]	Underscore [ _ ]	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	Quotation mark ["]	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Nonstandard punctuation [h]	Dollar sign [$] SX digraph	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Punctuation	At sign [@] AC digraph	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Prosigns	End of work SK digraph	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Prosigns	Error HH digraph	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
Prosigns	General invitation to transmit Also used for letter K	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Prosigns	Starting signal CT digraph	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
Prosigns	New message follows RN digraph   Message or page separator [j]	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Prosigns	Verified Also used for letter Ŝ	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
Prosigns	Wait Proposed for use as ampersand  [&] [i]	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	À, à Code shared with Å	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ä, ä Code shared with Æ, Ą	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Å, å Code shared with À	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ą, ą Code shared with Ä, Æ	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Æ, æ Code shared with Ä, Ą	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ć, ć Code shared with Ĉ, Ç	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ĉ, ĉ Code shared with Ć, Ç	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ç, ç Code shared with Ć, Ĉ	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	CH, ch Code shared with Ĥ, Š	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Đ, đ Code shared with É [k] , Ę  Distinct from eth (Ð, ð)	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ð, ð Distinct from D with stroke (Đ, đ)	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin extensions	É, é [k] Code shared with Đ, Ę	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	È, è Code shared with Ł	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ę, ę Code shared with Đ, É [k]	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ĝ, ĝ	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ĥ, ĥ Code shared with CH, Š	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ĵ, ĵ	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ł, ł Code shared with È	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ń, ń Code shared with Ñ	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ñ, ñ Code shared with Ń	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ó, ó Code shared with Ö, Ø	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ö, ö Code shared with Ó, Ø	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ø, ø Code shared with Ó, Ö	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ś, ś	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ŝ, ŝ Prosign for verified	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Š, š Code shared with CH, Ĥ	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Þ, þ	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ü, ü Code shared with Ŭ	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ŭ, ŭ Code shared with Ü	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ź, ź	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  ⓘ
non-Latin [h] extensions	Ż, ż	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  ⓘ

Cut numbers

Most numbers have an unofficial short-form, given in the table below. They are only used when both the sender and the receiver understand that numbers, and not letters, are intended;^{[ citation needed ]} for example, one often sees the most common R-S-T signal report rendered as 5NN^[‡] instead of 599.^{[ citation needed ]}

Cut numbers
^{[ citation needed ]}

Intended     digit	'Cut' number   code	Same as code in      Intl. Morse [*]	Normal code      (long form) [*]
0	▄▄▄	T	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄
1	▄ ▄▄▄	A	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄
2	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄	U	▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄
3	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄	V	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄
4	n/a[†]	4[†]	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ [†]
5	▄ [‡]	E or 5[‡]	▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ [‡]
6	n/a[†]	6[†]	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ [†]
7	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄	B	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄
8	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄	D	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄
9	▄▄▄ ▄	N	▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄
.	▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄	K	▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄

	Table notes
[*]	Codes that are not cut numbers, or are not numbers, are shaded grey in the table.
[†]	There are no distinct cut-number codes for 4 or 6, since cut numbers come from reducing multiple dahs in the standard Morse number codes to only one dah, but keeping all the dits as-is.
[‡]	Some operators just send the normal code for 5, even when using other cut numbers, since five dits are still fairly short (same duration as cut 3 and cut 7), and a single dit could possibly be misinterpreted as a mistaken cut 1 or cut decimal point.[ citation needed ]

Prosigns

Main article: Prosigns for Morse code

Prosigns for Morse code are special (usually) unwritten procedural signals or symbols that are used to indicate changes in communications protocol status or white space text formatting actions.

Symbol representations

The symbols [!], [$], and [&] are not defined inside the official ITU-R International Morse Code Recommendation, ^[1] but informal conventions for them exist. (The [@] symbol was formally added in 2004.)

Exclamation mark

There is no standard representation for the exclamation mark [!], although the KW digraph (  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ) was proposed in the 1980s by the Heathkit Company. ^[l] While Morse code translation software prefers the Heathkit version, on-air use is not yet universal as some amateur radio operators in North America and the Caribbean continue to use the older MN digraph (  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ) ^[m] copied over from American Morse landline code.

Currency symbols

The ITU has never formally codified any currency symbols into Morse code: The unambiguous ISO 4217 currency codes are preferred for transmission.

The [$] sign code was represented in the Phillips Code ^[n] as two characters "SX", which became merged into SX (  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ).

Ampersand [&]

The suggested unofficial encoding of the ampersand [&] sign listed above, ^[i] often shown as AS, is also the official Morse prosign for wait. In addition, the American Morse encoding for an ampersand (  ▄  ▄ ▄ ▄ ) was similar to ES (  ▄   ▄ ▄ ▄ ) and hams have nearly universally carried over this use as an abbreviation for "and" (e.g. WX HR COLD ES RAINYthe weather here is cold and rainy).

Keyboard "at" sign [@]

On 24 May 2004 – the 160th anniversary of the first public Morse telegraph transmission – the Radiocommunication Bureau of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-R) formally added the [@] ("commercial at" or "commat") character to the official Morse character set, using the sequence denoted by the AC digraph:   ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  . ^{[1] [66]}

This sequence was reported to have been chosen to represent "A[t] C[ommercial]", or a letter "a" inside a swirl represented by a letter "C". The new character facilitates sending e‑mail addresses by Morse code, and is notable since it is the first official addition to the Morse set of characters since World War I. ^[66]

Diacritics and non-Latin extensions

Main article: Morse code for non-Latin alphabets

The typical tactic for creating Morse codes for diacritics and non-Latin alphabetic scripts has been to begin by simply using the International Morse codes used for letters whose sound matches the sound of the local alphabet. Because Gerke code (the predecessor to International Morse) was in official use in central Europe, ^[23] and included four characters not included in the International Morse standard (Ä, Ö, Ü, and CH) it has served as a beginning-point for other languages that use an alphabetic script, but require codes for letters not accommodated by International Morse.

The usual method has been to first transliterate the sounds represented by the International code and the four unique Gerke codes into the local alphabet, hence Greek, Hebrew, Russian, and Ukrainian Morse codes. If more codes are needed, one can either invent a new code or convert an otherwise unused code from either code set to the non-Latin letter. For example:

• Ñ in Spanish Morse is   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ , a language-specific code not used in either International or Gerke Morse.
• For the Greek letter Ψ , Greek Morse code uses the International Morse code for Q ,   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ , which has no corresponding letter in modern Greek; Ψ and Q have no historical, phonetic, or shape relationship.

For Russian and Bulgarian, Russian Morse code is used to map the Cyrillic characters to four-element codes. Many of the characters are encoded the same as their latin-alphabet look-alikes or sound-alikes (A, O, E, I, T, M, N, R, K, etc.). The Bulgarian alphabet contains 30 characters, which exactly match all possible combinations of 1, 2, 3, and 4 dits and dahs (Russian Ы is used as Bulgarian Ь, Russian Ь is used as Bulgarian Ъ). Russian requires two more codes, for letters Э and Ъ which are each encoded with 5 elements.

Non-alphabetic scripts require more radical adaption. Japanese Morse code (Wabun code) has a separate encoding for kana script; although many of the codes are used for International Morse, the sounds they represent are mostly unrelated. The Japanese / Wabun code includes special prosigns for switching back-and-forth from International Morse:   ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  signals a switch from International Morse to Wabun, and   ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  to return from Wabun to International Morse.

For Chinese, Chinese telegraph code is used to map Chinese characters to four-digit codes and send these digits out using standard Morse code. Korean Morse code ^[67] uses the SKATS mapping, originally developed to allow Korean to be typed on western typewriters. SKATS maps hangul characters to arbitrary letters of the Latin script and has no relationship to pronunciation in Korean.

Unusual variants

During early World War I (1914–1916), Germany briefly experimented with 'dotty' and 'dashy' Morse, in essence adding a dot or a dash at the end of each Morse symbol. Each one was quickly broken by Allied SIGINT, and standard Morse was resumed by Spring 1916. Only a small percentage of Western Front (North Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea) traffic was in 'dotty' or 'dashy' Morse during the entire war. In popular culture, this is mostly remembered in the book The Codebreakers by David Kahn and in the national archives of the UK and Australia (whose SIGINT operators copied most of this Morse variant). Kahn's cited sources come from the popular press and wireless magazines of the time. ^[68]

Other variations include forms of "fractional Morse" or "fractionated Morse", which recombine the characters of the Morse code–encoded message and then encrypt them using a cipher in order to disguise the text. ^[69]

Decoding software

Decoding software for Morse code ranges from software-defined wide-band radio receivers, coupled to the Reverse Beacon Network, ^[70] which decodes signals and detects CQ messages on ham bands, to smartphone applications. ^[71]

See also

• ACP 131
• Alfred Vail
• CW Operators' Club
• Guglielmo Marconi
• High-speed telegraphy
• Hog-Morse
• Instructograph
• Morse code abbreviations
• Morse code mnemonics
• NATO phonetic alphabet
• Radio code
• Tap code
• Theodore Roosevelt McElroy
• Wabun code
• Wireless telegraphy

Footnotes

1. Until 1949, words were separated by a space equal to five dits. ^[6]
2. The time needed to transmit the word PARIS is typically used as the standard "word" for calculating the "word per minute" rate. Other standard "words" such as CODEX are also used. ^[7]
3. These modern "iambic" keys are operated by one or two "paddles" pressed left and right, instead of pressing down a lever, as in the traditional telegraph keys, pictured at the start of this article. Operating paddle keys is similar to using the old Vibroplex clockwork telegraph keys: Pressing the paddle to the right generates a series of repeated dits until the paddle is released; pressing the paddle to the left produces a similar series of dahs; and with two-paddle electronic keys, squeezing the two paddles from both sides produces an alternating dit dah dit dah sequence.
   For left-handed operators, the actions of the two paddles are often reversed.
4. The semiautomatic key paddle, when pressed to the right by the thumb, kicks a clockwork-like horizontal pendulum that generates a series of dits, the length and timing of which are controlled by a sliding the pendulum weight toward the rear of the unit. When pressed to the left by the knuckle of the index finger, the paddle generates a single dah, the length of which is controlled by the operator. Multiple dahs require multiple presses. Left-handed operators may use a key built as a mirror image of this one.
5. The name continuous wave was chosen to distinguish the single-frequency transmission mode from the sliding-frequency damped wave signals from now-banned spark-gap transmitters. Although the modern ON / OFF signal itself is interrupted, not continuous, it does (ideally) maintain a single, constant frequency carrier wave throughout any one transmission.
6. For people with severe disabilities, both one- and two-switch Morse can be difficult because both depend, to some extent, on timing. ... access products can also offer "three-switch Morse.". In three-switch Morse code, one switch signals dit, while another signals dah, just like two-switch Morse. But a third switch is used to indicate that the letter is complete. This removes the necessity of timing to send Morse code. – D.K. Anson (2018) ^[48]
7. A well-known Morse code rhythm from the Second World War period derives from Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, the opening phrase of which was regularly played at the beginning of BBC broadcasts. The timing of the notes corresponds to the Morse for V, di di di dah (  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ), understood as "'V' for Victory". ^{[63] [64]}
8. 
   The character or symbol encoding is not in either ITU-R  M.1172 ^[65] or ITU-R  M.1677-1 . ^[1]
9. The well-established standard abbreviation for "and" is E S, adapted from the code for ampersand in Railroad Morse. The code for E S(  ▄   ▄ ▄ ▄  ) is actually slightly shorter in duration than the wait prosign (  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  ), so there is no motivative to replace it.
10. Single-line decoding display may use printed "+" for message separator prosign.
11. Although not strictly a Latin alphabet character, the code for É is part of the ITU-R Morse code standard, and is the only accented character included in the recommendation. ^[1]
12. Heathkit was a popular, long-standing vendor of kits for amateur radio equipment.
13. MN or OE,   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ , is shared with unofficial Ö, Ó, and Ø used in some non-Latin alphabets.
14. The Phillips Code was a huge collection of abbreviations used on land line telegraphy.

References

1. International Morse Code Recommendation. Radiocommunication Sector. itu.int (Report). ITU Recommendation. International Telecommunication Union. October 2009. ITU-R M.1677-1. Archived from the original on 6 November 2012. Retrieved 23 December 2011.
2. Gotthard morse key used by shortwave radio amateur HB9BFM. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
3. Beechey, F.S. (1876). Electro-Telegraphy. London, UK: E. & F.N. Spon. p. 71 – via Archive.org.
4. Camm, F.J. (1941). Radio Engineers' Pocket Book (2nd ed.). Chemical Publishing Co. p. 72 – via Archive.org.
5. Telegraph Regulations (PDF) (Report). ITU History. Geneva, CH: International Telecommunication Union. 1949 [1947]. p. 42. the space between two words is equal to seven dots; — Annexed to the International Telecommunication Convention, Atlantic City, 1947; revised Paris, 1949.
6. Telegraph Regulations (PDF) (Report). ITU History. Geneva, CH: International Telecommunication Union. 1938 [1932]. p. 39. The space between two words is equal to five dots. — Annexed to the International Telecommunication Convention, Madrid, 1932; revised Cairo, 1938.
7. TM 11-459. International Morse Code (Instructions). Washington, DC: Department of the Army / U.S. Government Printing Office. 1968. pp. 6–7.
8. Radioman 3 & 2 (PDF). Bureau of Naval Personnel, U.S. Navy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1957. pp. 105–111. RM32-10228B.
9. Preece, W.H.; Sivewright, J. (1891). Telegraphy. London, UK: Longmans, Green, and Co. p. 40.
10. Signal Communication. Signal Corps. U.S. Army. 1939. pp. 83, 101–108, 227. FM 24-5.
11. Everitt, W.L. (1937). Communication Engineering (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. p. 6.
12. Smith, W.W.; Dawley, Ray L.; et al., eds. (1940). The "Radio" Handbook (7th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Editors and Engineers Ltd. p. 178. Retrieved 18 July 2022.
13. Instructions for Learning International Morse Characters. War Department. 1943. pp. 52, 68–72. TM 11-459.
14. Fahie, John Joseph (1884). A History of Electric Telegraphy, to the Year 1837 (PDF). E. & F.N. Spon. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
15. Engineer-in-Chief's Office (1938) [1919]. Elementary Principles of Telegraphy and Systems up to Morse Duplex (Report). Technical Pamphlets for Workmen. London, UK: His Majesty's Stationery Office. p. 6.
16. Freebody, J.W. (1959). "Historical survey of telegraphy". Telegraphy. London, UK: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd. pp. 28–29.
17. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for the Year 1878 (Report). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. 1879. pp. 358–360. Retrieved 17 March 2021– via Archive.org.
18. Burns, R.W. (2004). Communications: An international history of the formative years. Institution of Electrical Engineers. pp. 79, 84. ISBN   0-86341-327-7.
19. "Learning Morse code". Arrl.org. Newington, CT: American Radio Relay League. Archived from the original on 20 September 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
20. Carron, L. Peter (1986). Morse Code: The essential language. Radio amateur's library. Vol. 69. American Radio Relay League. ISBN   0-87259-035-6.
21. Eckersley, R.J., ed. (1985). Amateur Radio Operating Manual. Radio Society of Great Britain. ISBN   0-900612-69-X.
22. "Iddy-umpty" . Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 22 October 2016.
23. [No title cited] (Report) (in German). Deutsch-Österreichischer Telegraphenverein (German-Austrian Telegraph Union). 1851. The Deutsch-Österreichischer Telegraphenverein officially adopted Gerke's redaction / revision of Morse code in 1851.^{[ full citation needed ]}
24. Howeth, Linwood S., Captain (1963). History of Communications-Electronics in the United States: Early Navy efforts to develop aircraft radio. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Govt. Print. Off.
25. "K2TQN vintage radio column". K2tqn.com (blog). Archived from the original on 11 September 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
26. "How the Zeppelin raiders are guided by radio signals". Popular Science Monthly . April 1918. pp. 632–634. Retrieved 4 March 2018.
27. "An obituary for Morse code". The Economist . 23 January 1999. Archived from the original on 30 March 2017.
28. "Maritime Radio Historical Society". radiomarine.org. Archived from the original on 25 January 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
29. "Morse code training in the Air Force". Swling.com. 10 December 2015. Archived from the original on 2 July 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
30. "Amendments to the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual" (PDF). USCG.mil. 2011. Circ 1367, Amd. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
31. "Radiotelegraph Operator License (T)". fcc.gov. Federal Communications Commission. Archived from the original on 13 January 2015. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
32. "Maritime Radio Historical Society". radiomarine.org. Archived from the original on 9 October 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
33. Perera, Tom. "The "Morse" code and the continental code". W1TP Telegraph & Scientific Instruments Museums. Archived from the original on 9 December 2011. Retrieved 23 December 2011.
34. Pierpont, William G., N0HFF (13 May 2004) [2002]. The Art & Skill of Radio Telegraphy (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 February 2012. Retrieved 14 June 2013– via pcpractice.com.
35. "Extremely High Speed Club official web page". Morsecode.nl. Archived from the original on 28 June 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
36. "Chapter 1. Air Navigation". faa.gov. 3 January 2015. Archived from the original on 1 December 2014. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
37. "COM 3.2" (PDF). Canadian AIM. 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 November 2013.
38. "WG - Winnipeg". Pilotnav.com. Archived from the original on 2 December 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
39. "rel 2003-07-03 att-2". IARU web (iaru.org) (Press release). The International Amateur Radio Union. Archived from the original on 6 September 2012.
40. "Italy joins no-code ranks as FCC revives Morse debate in the U.S." The ARRL Letter. Vol. 24, no. 31. 12 August 2005. Archived from the original on 5 November 2011. Retrieved 2 April 2012.
41. "Amendment of Part 97 of the Commission's Amateur Service Rules" (PDF). 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review. c. 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 October 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2005.
42. "A standard for Morse timing using the Farnsworth technique" (PDF). ARRL.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
43. "Custom Farnsworth spacing configuration". Winmorse.com. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
44. "Chapter 1". Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM). U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 10 December 2007.
45. "Prosigns". QTH.Com. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 21 January 2015– via QSL.net.
46. King, Thomas W. (2000). Modern Morse code in rehabilitation and education: New applications in assistive technology. Allyn & Bacon. ISBN   9780205287512. OCLC   41070880.
47. Lubin, Jim (2020). "Morse Codes for Computer Access".
48. Anson, Denis K. (2018). "Chapter 5. Input strategies: Morse strategies". Assitive Technology for People with Disabilies. ABC-CLIO. p. 74. ISBN   978-1-4408-3512-4.
49. "Morse Code". Ace Centre (UK ACC Charity). 2020.
50. "Android accessibility help: Use Morse code". Google support. 2018. Retrieved 21 December 2018.
51. Newell and, A.F.; Nabavi, C.D. (1969). "VOTEM: the voice operated typewriter employing Morse code". J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 2 (8): 655–657. doi:10.1088/0022-3735/2/8/314. PMID   5807885.
52. Ross, Dennis W. (March 1992). "Morse code: A place in the mind". QST magazine . p. 51.
53. Curt, Ronald J. (July 1990). "In the blink of an eye". QST magazine . p. 44.
54. Burch, Donna (July 1990). "Morse code from the heart". QST magazine . p. 45.
55. NATO phonetic alphabet, codes & signals. Poster, 2018.
56. Beauchamp, Ken (2001). History of Telegraphy. Institution of Electrical Engineers IET. p. 150. ISBN   0852967926.
57. United States Code of Federal Regulations Title 47 §13.207(c), §13.209(d), §97.503 [1996]
58. "Fastest speed for a Morse code transmission". Guinnessworldrecords.com. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
59. Koch, Ludwig (1936). Arbeitspsychologische Untersuchung der Tätigkeit bei der Aufnahme von Morsezeichen (Dissertation). Technische Hochschule Carolo-Wilhelmina. 10247-549-4.
60. AmericanRadio, RelayLeague. "W1AW Code Practice Schedule". ARRL. American Radio Relay League. Retrieved 3 June 2022.
61. Linton, Tanja (30 April 2015). "Fort Huachuca bids farewell to Morse code training". US Army. Retrieved 29 May 2021.
62. Baden-Powell, Robert, Lord (1938). "Girl Guiding" (PDF). Pearson. p. 61. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 October 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015. Some people find it easier to remember the [dots] and dashes by picturing them as forming the letters ...^{(page 61)}
63. Stanley, Glenn (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Beethoven. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 269. ISBN   0-521-58934-7.
64. Studwell, William Emmett (1997). The Americana Song Reader. Routledge. p. 62. ISBN   0-7890-0150-0.
65. Miscellaneous abbreviations and signals to be used for radiocommunications in the maritime mobile service. Radiocommunication Sector. ITU.int (Report). ITU Recommendation. Geneva, CH: International Telecommunication Union. ITU-R M.1172.
66. "International Morse code gets a new ITU home, new character". ARRL.org/news. Newington, CT: American Radio Relay League. 10 December 2003. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 27 February 2007.
67. "Morse". homepages.cwi.nl/~dik. Codes. Archived from the original on 9 November 2010. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
68. Wythoff, Grant (July 2014). "The Invention of Wireless Cryptography". The Appendix: Futures of the Past. Vol. 2, no. 3. Archived from the original on 8 December 2014. Retrieved 28 January 2015.
69. "Fractionated Morse, and other oddities". Quadibloc.com. Crypto. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
70. "Welcome! - Reverse Beacon Network". Reversebeacon.net. Archived from the original on 12 September 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
71. Ziegenhain, Gerolf (20 May 2013). "Morse decoder test – iPhone / iPad". Gerolfziegenhain.wordpress.com. Archived from the original on 27 July 2017. Retrieved 17 September 2016.

External links

• "Morse code". Encyclopædia Britannica. 16 October 2023.

• "Morse code". Radio Amateur. Curlie.org. Recreation.

• "Morse Code resources". DXZone.com.

• "Morse code MP3 practice files". starling.us. — 200 hours of at increasing speeds plus an ASCII-to-CW file generator program.

• International Morse code, hand sending. YouTube (training film). U.S. Army. 1966. Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine :

• Technique of hand sending. YouTube (training film). Morse code radio operator training. U.S. Navy. 1944. Archived from the original on 7 July 2012.

• "Codes of the World" (PDF). nonstopsystems.com.