Elamite cuneiform

Last updated
Elamite cuneiform
Naram-Sin stele inscription in Elamite.jpg
Inscription of Shutruk-Nahhunte in Elamite cuneiform on the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin.
Script type
Time period
2300 BCE to 400 BCE
Languages Elamite language
Related scripts
Parent systems
Sister systems
Old Persian cuneiform
 This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA).For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.For the distinction between [ ], / / and  , see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.

Elamite cuneiform was a logo-syllabic script used to write the Elamite language. The corpus of Elamite cuneiform consists of tablets and fragments. The majority were created during the Achaemenid era, and contain primarily economic records.

Contents

History and decipherment

The Elamite language (c. 2600 BCE to 400 BCE), [1] is the now-extinct language spoken by Elamites, who inhabited the regions of Khūzistān and Fārs in Southern Iran. [2] It has long been an enigma for scholars due to the scarcity of resources for its research and the irregularities found in the language. [2] It seems to have no relation to its neighboring Semitic and Indo-European languages. [3] Scholars fiercely argue over several hypotheses about its origin, but have no definite theory.

Elamite cuneiform comes in two variants, the first, derived from Akkadian, was used during the 3rd to 2nd millennia BCE, and a simplified form used during the 1st millennium BCE. [2] The main difference between the two variants is the reduction of glyphs used in the simplified version. [4] At any one time, there would only be around 130 cuneiform signs in use. Throughout the script's history, only 206 different signs were used in total.

Archaeological sources

First document in Elamite cuneiform (2250 BCE)

Probable treaty of alliance between Naram-Sin and Khita of Susa, king of Awan. Elamite cuneiforms, c. 2250, Susa, Louvre Museum. Alliance Naram-Sin Awan Louvre Sb8833.jpg
Probable treaty of alliance between Naram-Sin and Khita of Susa, king of Awan. Elamite cuneiforms, c. 2250, Susa, Louvre Museum.

The earliest text using Elamite cuneiform, an adaptation of Akkadian cuneiform, is a treaty between the Akkadian Naram-Sin and the Elamite Khita that dates back to 2250 BCE. [2] The Treaty enumerates the kings of Elam, as guarantors of the agreement, and states: [6]

The enemy of Naram-Sin is my enemy, the friend of Naram-Sin is my friend

Akkadian-Elamite Treaty of 2250 BCE [6]

However, some believe that Elamite cuneiform might have been in use since 2500 BCE. [4] The tablets are poorly preserved, so only limited parts can be read, but it is understood that the text is a treaty between the Akkad king Nāramsîn and Elamite ruler Hita, as indicated by frequent references like "Nāramsîn's friend is my friend, Nāramsîn's enemy is my enemy". [2]

Persepolis Administrative Archives

In 1933–34, 33,000 Elamite cuneiform tablets were found as part of the Persepolis Administrative Archives. [7] The Archives are the most important primary source for an understanding of the internal workings of the Achaemenid Empire.

Other Achaemenid inscriptions

The most famous Elamite scriptures and the ones that ultimately led to its decipherment are the ones found in the trilingual inscriptions of monuments commissioned by the Achaemenid Persian kings; the Achaemenid royal inscriptions. [8] The inscriptions, like the Rosetta Stone's, were written in three different writing systems. The first was Old Persian, which was deciphered in 1802 by Georg Friedrich Grotefend. The second, Babylonian cuneiform, was deciphered shortly after the Old Persian text. Because Elamite is unlike its neighboring Semitic languages, the script's decipherment was delayed until the 1840s. Even today, lack of sources and comparative materials hinder further research of Elamite. [2]

Inventory

Elamite radically reduced the number of cuneiform glyphs. From the entire history of the script, only 206 glyphs are used; at any one time, the number was fairly constant at about 130. In the earliest tablets the script is almost entirely syllabic, with almost all common Old Akkadian syllabic glyphs with C V and VC values being adopted. Over time the number of syllabic glyphs is reduced while the number of logograms increases. About 40 CVC glyphs are also occasionally used, but they appear to have been used for the consonants and ignored the vocalic value. Several determinatives are also used. [4]

Elamite CV and VC syllabic glyphs
Monumental Achaemenid inscriptions, 5th century BCE
CaCeCiCuaCeCiCuC
p
b
𒉺 pa
𒁀 ba

𒁁 be
𒉿 pe ~ pi𒁍 pu𒀊 ap𒅁 ip (𒌈 íp)𒌒 up
k
g
𒋡 ka4𒆠 ke ~ ki
𒄀 ge ~ gi
𒆪 ku𒀝 ak𒅅 ik𒊌 uk
t
d

𒆪 da
𒋼 te𒋾 ti𒌅 tu, 𒌈 tu4
𒁺 du
𒀜 at 𒌓 ut
š𒐼 šá (𒊮 šà)𒊺 še𒅆 ši𒋗 šu𒀾𒆜 iš ~ uš
s
z (č)
𒊓 sa
𒍝 ca
𒋛 se ~ si
𒍢 ce ~ ci
𒋢 su𒊍 as/ac𒄑 is/ic
y𒅀 ya
l𒆷 la𒇷 le ~ li𒇻 lu𒌌 ul
m𒈠 ma𒈨 me𒈪 mi𒈬 mu𒄠 am𒌝 um
n𒈾 na𒉌 ne ~ ni𒉡 nu𒀭 an𒂗 en𒅔 in𒌦 un
r𒊏 ra𒊑 re ~ ri𒊒 ru𒅕 ir𒌨 ur
h
0
𒄩 ha
𒀀 a

𒂊 e
𒄭 hi
𒄿 i
𒄷 hu
𒌋 u, 𒌑 ú
𒄴 ah

Glyphs in parentheses in the table are not common.

The script distinguished the four vowels of Akkadian and 15 consonants, /p/, /b/, /k/, /g/, /t/, /d/, /š/, /s/, /z/, /y/, /l/, /m/, /n/, /r/, and /h/. The Akkadian voiced pairs /p, b/, /k, g/, and /t, d/ may not have been distinct in Elamite. The series transcribed z may have been an affricate such as /č/ or /c/ (ts). /hV/ was not always distinguished from simple vowels, suggesting that /h/ may have been dropping out of the language. The VC glyphs are often used for a syllable coda without any regard to the value of V, suggesting that they were in fact alphabetic C signs. [4]

Much of the conflation of Ce and Ci, and also eC and iC, is inherited from Akkadian (pe-pi-bi, ke-ki, ge-gi, se-si, ze-zi, le-li, re-ri, and ḫe-ḫi—that is, only ne-ni are distinguished in Akkadian but not Elamite; of the VC syllables, only eš-iš-uš). In addition, 𒄴 is aḫ, eḫ, iḫ, uḫ in Akkadian, and so effectively is a coda consonant even there.

Syntax

Elamite cuneiform is similar to that of Akkadian cuneiform except for a few unusual features. For example, the primary function of CVC glyphs was to indicate the two consonants rather than the syllable. [4] Thus certain words used the glyphs for "tir" and "tar" interchangeably and the vowel was ignored. Occasionally, the vowel is acknowledged such that "tir" will be used in the context "ti-rV". Thus "ti-ra" might be written with the glyphs for "tir" and "a" or "ti" and "ra".

Elamite cuneiform allows for a lot of freedom when constructing syllables. For example, CVC syllables are sometimes represented by using a CV and VC glyph. The vowel in the second glyph is irrelevant so "sa-ad" and "sa-ud" are equivalent. Additionally, "VCV" syllables are represented by combining "V" and "CV" glyphs or "VC" and "CV" glyphs that have a common consonant. Thus "ap-pa" and "a-pa" are equivalent.

See also

Notes

  1. Gaspa, Salvatore. "Elamite". Mnamon.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Khačikjan (1998)
  3. Starostin, George (2002)
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Peter Daniels and William Bright (1996)
  5. Hansen, Donald P. (2002). Leaving No Stones Unturned: Essays on the Ancient Near East and Egypt in Honor of Donald P. Hansen. Eisenbrauns. p. 233. ISBN   978-1-57506-055-2.
  6. 1 2 3 "Site officiel du musée du Louvre". cartelfr.louvre.fr.
  7. Vollmers, Gloria L. “ACCOUNTING AND CONTROL IN THE PERSEPOLIS FORTIFICATION TABLETS.” The Accounting Historians Journal, vol. 36, no. 2, 2009, pp. 93–111
  8. Reiner, Erica (2005)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Behistun Inscription</span> Ancient multilingual stone inscription in Iran

The Behistun Inscription is a multilingual Achaemenid royal inscription and large rock relief on a cliff at Mount Behistun in the Kermanshah Province of Iran, near the city of Kermanshah in western Iran, established by Darius the Great. It was important to the decipherment of cuneiform, as it is the longest known trilingual cuneiform inscription, written in Old Persian, Elamite, and Babylonian.

In the linguistic study of written languages, a syllabary is a set of written symbols that represent the syllables or moras which make up words.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Writing</span> Persistent representation of language

Writing is the act of creating a persistent representation of human language. A writing system uses a set of symbols and rules to encode aspects of spoken language, such as its lexicon and syntax. However, written language may take on characteristics distinct from those of any spoken language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Akkadian language</span> Extinct Semitic language of Mesopotamia

Akkadian is an extinct East Semitic language that was spoken in ancient Mesopotamia from the third millennium BC until its gradual replacement in common use by Old Aramaic among Assyrians and Babylonians from the 8th century BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ugaritic alphabet</span> Cuneiform consonantal alphabet of 30 letters

The Ugaritic writing system is a cuneiform abjad with syllabic elements used from around either 1400 BCE or 1300 BCE for Ugaritic, an extinct Northwest Semitic language. It was discovered in Ugarit, modern Ras Shamra, Syria, in 1928. It has 30 letters. Other languages, particularly Hurrian, were occasionally written in the Ugaritic script in the area around Ugarit, although not elsewhere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cuneiform</span> Writing system of the ancient Near East

Cuneiform is a logo-syllabic writing system that was used to write several languages of the Ancient Near East. The script was in active use from the early Bronze Age until the beginning of the Common Era. Cuneiform scripts are marked by and named for the characteristic wedge-shaped impressions which form their signs. Cuneiform is the earliest known writing system and was originally developed to write the Sumerian language of southern Mesopotamia.

Old Persian is one of two directly attested Old Iranian languages and is the ancestor of Middle Persian. Like other Old Iranian languages, it was known to its native speakers as ariya (Iranian). Old Persian is close to both Avestan and the language of the Rig Veda, the oldest form of the Sanskrit language. All three languages are highly inflected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elamite language</span> Extinct language of the ancient Elamites of Iran

Elamite, also known as Hatamtite and formerly as Scythic, Median, Amardian, Anshanian and Susian, is an extinct language that was spoken by the ancient Elamites. It was recorded in what is now southwestern Iran from 2600 BC to 330 BC. Elamite is generally thought to have no demonstrable relatives and is usually considered a language isolate. The lack of established relatives makes its interpretation difficult.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assyriology</span> Archaeological sub-discipline

Assyriology, also known as Cuneiform studies or Ancient Near East studies, is the archaeological, anthropological, historical, and linguistic study of the cultures that used cuneiform writing. The field covers Pre Dynastic Mesopotamia, Sumer, the early Sumero-Akkadian city-states, the Akkadian Empire, Ebla, the Akkadian and Imperial Aramaic speaking states of Assyria, Babylonia and the Sealand Dynasty, the migrant foreign dynasties of southern Mesopotamia, including the Gutians, Amorites, Kassites, Arameans, Suteans and Chaldeans. Assyriology can be included to cover Neolithic pre-Dynastic cultures dating to as far back as 8000 BC, to the Islamic Conquest of the 7th century AD, so the topic is significantly wider than that implied by the root "Assyria".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cypriot syllabary</span> Syllabic script used in Iron Age Cyprus

The Cypriot or Cypriote syllabary is a syllabic script used in Iron Age Cyprus, from about the 11th to the 4th centuries BCE, when it was replaced by the Greek alphabet. It has been suggested that the script remained in use as late as the 1st century BC. A pioneer of that change was King Evagoras of Salamis. It is thought to be descended from the Cypro-Minoan syllabary, itself a variant or derivative of Linear A. Most texts using the script are in the Arcadocypriot dialect of Greek, but also one bilingual inscription was found in Amathus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iberian scripts</span> Writing systems

The Iberian scripts are the Paleohispanic scripts that were used to represent the extinct Iberian language. Most of them are typologically unusual in that they are semi-syllabic rather than purely alphabetic. The oldest Iberian inscriptions date to the 4th or possibly the 5th century BCE, and the latest from end of the 1st century BCE or possibly the beginning of the 1st century CE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maya script</span> Writing system of the Maya civilization

Maya script, also known as Maya glyphs, is historically the native writing system of the Maya civilization of Mesoamerica and is the only Mesoamerican writing system that has been substantially deciphered. The earliest inscriptions found which are identifiably Maya date to the 3rd century BCE in San Bartolo, Guatemala. Maya writing was in continuous use throughout Mesoamerica until the Spanish conquest of the Maya in the 16th and 17th centuries. Though modern Mayan languages are almost entirely written using the Latin alphabet rather than Maya script, there have been recent developments encouraging a revival of the Maya glyph system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linear Elamite</span> Writing system from Elam

Linear Elamite was a writing system used in Elam during the Bronze Age between c. 2300 and 1850 BCE, and known mainly from a few extant monumental inscriptions. It was used contemporaneously with Elamite cuneiform and records the Elamite language. The French archaeologist François Desset and his colleagues have argued that it is the oldest known purely phonographic writing system, although others, such as the linguist Michael Mäder, have argued that it is partly logographic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Persian cuneiform</span> Semi-alphabetic cuneiform script

Old Persian cuneiform is a semi-alphabetic cuneiform script that was the primary script for Old Persian. Texts written in this cuneiform have been found in Iran, Armenia, Romania (Gherla), Turkey, and along the Suez Canal. They were mostly inscriptions from the time period of Darius I, such as the DNa inscription, as well as his son, Xerxes I. Later kings down to Artaxerxes III used more recent forms of the language classified as "pre-Middle Persian".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multilingual inscription</span> Inscription that includes the same text in two or more languages

In epigraphy, a multilingual inscription is an inscription that includes the same text in two or more languages. A bilingual is an inscription that includes the same text in two languages. Multilingual inscriptions are important for the decipherment of ancient writing systems, and for the study of ancient languages with small or repetitive corpora.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hittite cuneiform</span> Ancient Mesopotamian script

Hittite cuneiform is the implementation of cuneiform script used in writing the Hittite language. The surviving corpus of Hittite texts is preserved in cuneiform on clay tablets dating to the 2nd millennium BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paleohispanic scripts</span> Writing systems used before the Latin alphabet in Iberia

The Paleohispanic scripts are the writing systems created in the Iberian Peninsula before the Latin alphabet became the dominant script. They derive from the Phoenician alphabet, with the exception of the Greco-Iberian alphabet, which is a direct adaptation of the Greek alphabet. Some researchers believe that the Greek alphabet may also have played a role in the origin of the other Paleohispanic scripts. Most of these scripts are notable for being semi-syllabic rather than purely alphabetic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Semi-syllabary</span> Writing system that behaves partly as an alphabet and partly as a syllabary

A semi-syllabary is a writing system that behaves partly as an alphabet and partly as a syllabary. The main group of semi-syllabic writing are the Paleohispanic scripts of ancient Spain, a group of semi-syllabaries that transform redundant plosive consonants of the Phoenician alphabet into syllabograms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decipherment of cuneiform</span>

The decipherment of cuneiform began with the decipherment of Old Persian cuneiform between 1802 and 1836.

References