Khitan small script | |
---|---|
![]() Bronze mirror with a poetic inscription | |
Script type | with syllabary and possibly some phonograms |
Time period | 10th century — 12th century |
Direction | Top-to-bottom and right-to-left |
Languages | Khitan language |
Related scripts | |
Parent systems | Oracle bone script
|
Sister systems | Simplified Chinese, Kanji, Hanja, Tangut script, Chữ Hán, Zhuyin |
ISO 15924 | |
ISO 15924 | Kits(288),Khitan small script |
Unicode | |
Unicode alias | Khitan Small Script |
|
The Khitan small script (Chinese :契丹小字; pinyin :qìdān xiǎozì) was one of two writing systems used for the now-extinct Khitan language. It was used during the 10th–12th century by the Khitan people, who had created the Liao Empire in present-day northeastern China. In addition to the small script, the Khitans simultaneously also used a functionally independent writing system known as the Khitan large script. Both Khitan scripts continued to be in use to some extent by the Jurchens for several decades after the fall of the Liao dynasty, until the Jurchens fully switched to a script of their own. Examples of the scripts appeared most often on epitaphs and monuments, although other fragments sometimes surface.
The Khitan small script was invented in about 924 or 925 CE by a scholar named Yelü Diela. He drew his inspiration from "the Uyghur language and script", [1] which he was shown by a visiting Uyghur ambassador at the Khitan court. For this reason, Khitan small script was originally thought to be a daughter script of the Old Uyghur alphabet. [2]
Using a smaller number of symbols than large script, small script was less complex, yet still "able to record any word." [3] While small-script inscriptions employed some logograms as well, most words in small script were made using a blocked system reminiscent of the later Hangul writing of Korea, meaning that a word is represented by one group (square block) composed of several glyphs with individual phonetic meanings (somewhat similar to the jamo units of Hangul). Unlike Hangul's jamo, a Khitan phonetic symbol could represent not just a single vowel or consonant, but a consonant-vowel or vowel-consonant pair as well. [4] Each block could incorporate two to seven such "phonetic element" characters, written in pairs within the block, with the first half of the pair on the left. If there were an odd number of characters in a block, the unpaired character would be centered below the preceding pair.
Although there is some speculation, it appears there are no characters that both the small and large scripts share. Periodically, epitaphs written using small script will be written using the large script method of linearity. [5] Although small script had some similarities to Chinese, Khitan characters were often used to record Chinese words. The appearance of a likeness between a small script and a Chinese character does not help in the reading of Khitan. For example, the Chinese character for 'mountain' (山) is the same as the Khitan small script logogram for 'gold' (𘮝), and, thus, the name of the Jin dynasty. [1] [6]
Of the 378 known small script characters, 125 are semantic, 115 are phonetic, and the remainder have not been deciphered. [3] (Usually, it was possible to guess the phonetic value of an element if it has been used to transcribe a Chinese loanword in a Khitan inscription; otherwise, such phonetic values are hard to determine, as very little of the Khitan language is known. [7] ) Small script uses a mixture of logograms, syllabograms, and, as some as sources claim, a few single sound phonograms. Sometimes suffixes were written with syllabograms, just as single syllables sometimes were written with three syllabograms (with one each for the initial, medial, and final sounds of the syllable). Sometimes the initial consonants of syllables are indicated to be dental, labial, guttural, or nasal etc., based on the syllabograms involved. Additionally, vowels are sometimes indicated to be labial or non-labial, or pronounced in the front or back of the mouth.
Much of this information came from the "Khitan Script Research Group", led by the Mongolian scholar named Chinggeltei, who used monuments, calendar, and similar Chinese texts to decipher sections of small script. [note 1] A particularly valuable object of their study was the inscription on the Dà Jīn huángdì dūtǒng jīnglüè lángjūn xíngjì ( zh:大金皇弟都统经略郎君行记 ) stele, which is the only known bilingual Chinese-Khitan inscription. Produced during the Jurchen Jin dynasty it, ironically, was originally (before the discovery of other Khitan inscriptions in 1922) thought to be in Jurchen. [8]
There are no surviving examples of printed texts in the Khitan language, and aside from five example Khitan large characters with Chinese glosses in a book on calligraphy written by Tao Zongyi (陶宗儀) during the mid 14th century, there are no Chinese glossaries or dictionaries of Khitan.[ citation needed ]
The main source of Khitan texts are monumental inscriptions, mostly comprising memorial tablets buried in the tombs of Khitan nobility. [9] There are about 33 known monuments with inscriptions in the Khitan small script, ranging in date from 1053 to 1171.
The Khitan small script was added to Unicode version 13.0 in March 2020. 471 graphic characters are located in the Khitan Small Script block, while a single invisible filler character (U+16FE4: KHITAN SMALL SCRIPT FILLER) is located in the Ideographic Symbols and Punctuation block. The filler is inserted following the first character of a cluster, and denotes a character cluster laid out with one character on the first line, as opposed to the usual two. [10]
Khitan Small Script [1] [2] Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF) | ||||||||||||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
U+18B0x | 𘬀 | 𘬁 | 𘬂 | 𘬃 | 𘬄 | 𘬅 | 𘬆 | 𘬇 | 𘬈 | 𘬉 | 𘬊 | 𘬋 | 𘬌 | 𘬍 | 𘬎 | 𘬏 |
U+18B1x | 𘬐 | 𘬑 | 𘬒 | 𘬓 | 𘬔 | 𘬕 | 𘬖 | 𘬗 | 𘬘 | 𘬙 | 𘬚 | 𘬛 | 𘬜 | 𘬝 | 𘬞 | 𘬟 |
U+18B2x | 𘬠 | 𘬡 | 𘬢 | 𘬣 | 𘬤 | 𘬥 | 𘬦 | 𘬧 | 𘬨 | 𘬩 | 𘬪 | 𘬫 | 𘬬 | 𘬭 | 𘬮 | 𘬯 |
U+18B3x | 𘬰 | 𘬱 | 𘬲 | 𘬳 | 𘬴 | 𘬵 | 𘬶 | 𘬷 | 𘬸 | 𘬹 | 𘬺 | 𘬻 | 𘬼 | 𘬽 | 𘬾 | 𘬿 |
U+18B4x | 𘭀 | 𘭁 | 𘭂 | 𘭃 | 𘭄 | 𘭅 | 𘭆 | 𘭇 | 𘭈 | 𘭉 | 𘭊 | 𘭋 | 𘭌 | 𘭍 | 𘭎 | 𘭏 |
U+18B5x | 𘭐 | 𘭑 | 𘭒 | 𘭓 | 𘭔 | 𘭕 | 𘭖 | 𘭗 | 𘭘 | 𘭙 | 𘭚 | 𘭛 | 𘭜 | 𘭝 | 𘭞 | 𘭟 |
U+18B6x | 𘭠 | 𘭡 | 𘭢 | 𘭣 | 𘭤 | 𘭥 | 𘭦 | 𘭧 | 𘭨 | 𘭩 | 𘭪 | 𘭫 | 𘭬 | 𘭭 | 𘭮 | 𘭯 |
U+18B7x | 𘭰 | 𘭱 | 𘭲 | 𘭳 | 𘭴 | 𘭵 | 𘭶 | 𘭷 | 𘭸 | 𘭹 | 𘭺 | 𘭻 | 𘭼 | 𘭽 | 𘭾 | 𘭿 |
U+18B8x | 𘮀 | 𘮁 | 𘮂 | 𘮃 | 𘮄 | 𘮅 | 𘮆 | 𘮇 | 𘮈 | 𘮉 | 𘮊 | 𘮋 | 𘮌 | 𘮍 | 𘮎 | 𘮏 |
U+18B9x | 𘮐 | 𘮑 | 𘮒 | 𘮓 | 𘮔 | 𘮕 | 𘮖 | 𘮗 | 𘮘 | 𘮙 | 𘮚 | 𘮛 | 𘮜 | 𘮝 | 𘮞 | 𘮟 |
U+18BAx | 𘮠 | 𘮡 | 𘮢 | 𘮣 | 𘮤 | 𘮥 | 𘮦 | 𘮧 | 𘮨 | 𘮩 | 𘮪 | 𘮫 | 𘮬 | 𘮭 | 𘮮 | 𘮯 |
U+18BBx | 𘮰 | 𘮱 | 𘮲 | 𘮳 | 𘮴 | 𘮵 | 𘮶 | 𘮷 | 𘮸 | 𘮹 | 𘮺 | 𘮻 | 𘮼 | 𘮽 | 𘮾 | 𘮿 |
U+18BCx | 𘯀 | 𘯁 | 𘯂 | 𘯃 | 𘯄 | 𘯅 | 𘯆 | 𘯇 | 𘯈 | 𘯉 | 𘯊 | 𘯋 | 𘯌 | 𘯍 | 𘯎 | 𘯏 |
U+18BDx | 𘯐 | 𘯑 | 𘯒 | 𘯓 | 𘯔 | 𘯕 | 𘯖 | 𘯗 | 𘯘 | 𘯙 | 𘯚 | 𘯛 | 𘯜 | 𘯝 | 𘯞 | 𘯟 |
U+18BEx | 𘯠 | 𘯡 | 𘯢 | 𘯣 | 𘯤 | 𘯥 | 𘯦 | 𘯧 | 𘯨 | 𘯩 | 𘯪 | 𘯫 | 𘯬 | 𘯭 | 𘯮 | 𘯯 |
U+18BFx | 𘯰 | 𘯱 | 𘯲 | 𘯳 | 𘯴 | 𘯵 | 𘯶 | 𘯷 | 𘯸 | 𘯹 | 𘯺 | 𘯻 | 𘯼 | 𘯽 | 𘯾 | 𘯿 |
U+18C0x | 𘰀 | 𘰁 | 𘰂 | 𘰃 | 𘰄 | 𘰅 | 𘰆 | 𘰇 | 𘰈 | 𘰉 | 𘰊 | 𘰋 | 𘰌 | 𘰍 | 𘰎 | 𘰏 |
U+18C1x | 𘰐 | 𘰑 | 𘰒 | 𘰓 | 𘰔 | 𘰕 | 𘰖 | 𘰗 | 𘰘 | 𘰙 | 𘰚 | 𘰛 | 𘰜 | 𘰝 | 𘰞 | 𘰟 |
U+18C2x | 𘰠 | 𘰡 | 𘰢 | 𘰣 | 𘰤 | 𘰥 | 𘰦 | 𘰧 | 𘰨 | 𘰩 | 𘰪 | 𘰫 | 𘰬 | 𘰭 | 𘰮 | 𘰯 |
U+18C3x | 𘰰 | 𘰱 | 𘰲 | 𘰳 | 𘰴 | 𘰵 | 𘰶 | 𘰷 | 𘰸 | 𘰹 | 𘰺 | 𘰻 | 𘰼 | 𘰽 | 𘰾 | 𘰿 |
U+18C4x | 𘱀 | 𘱁 | 𘱂 | 𘱃 | 𘱄 | 𘱅 | 𘱆 | 𘱇 | 𘱈 | 𘱉 | 𘱊 | 𘱋 | 𘱌 | 𘱍 | 𘱎 | 𘱏 |
U+18C5x | 𘱐 | 𘱑 | 𘱒 | 𘱓 | 𘱔 | 𘱕 | 𘱖 | 𘱗 | 𘱘 | 𘱙 | 𘱚 | 𘱛 | 𘱜 | 𘱝 | 𘱞 | 𘱟 |
U+18C6x | 𘱠 | 𘱡 | 𘱢 | 𘱣 | 𘱤 | 𘱥 | 𘱦 | 𘱧 | 𘱨 | 𘱩 | 𘱪 | 𘱫 | 𘱬 | 𘱭 | 𘱮 | 𘱯 |
U+18C7x | 𘱰 | 𘱱 | 𘱲 | 𘱳 | 𘱴 | 𘱵 | 𘱶 | 𘱷 | 𘱸 | 𘱹 | 𘱺 | 𘱻 | 𘱼 | 𘱽 | 𘱾 | 𘱿 |
U+18C8x | 𘲀 | 𘲁 | 𘲂 | 𘲃 | 𘲄 | 𘲅 | 𘲆 | 𘲇 | 𘲈 | 𘲉 | 𘲊 | 𘲋 | 𘲌 | 𘲍 | 𘲎 | 𘲏 |
U+18C9x | 𘲐 | 𘲑 | 𘲒 | 𘲓 | 𘲔 | 𘲕 | 𘲖 | 𘲗 | 𘲘 | 𘲙 | 𘲚 | 𘲛 | 𘲜 | 𘲝 | 𘲞 | 𘲟 |
U+18CAx | 𘲠 | 𘲡 | 𘲢 | 𘲣 | 𘲤 | 𘲥 | 𘲦 | 𘲧 | 𘲨 | 𘲩 | 𘲪 | 𘲫 | 𘲬 | 𘲭 | 𘲮 | 𘲯 |
U+18CBx | 𘲰 | 𘲱 | 𘲲 | 𘲳 | 𘲴 | 𘲵 | 𘲶 | 𘲷 | 𘲸 | 𘲹 | 𘲺 | 𘲻 | 𘲼 | 𘲽 | 𘲾 | 𘲿 |
U+18CCx | 𘳀 | 𘳁 | 𘳂 | 𘳃 | 𘳄 | 𘳅 | 𘳆 | 𘳇 | 𘳈 | 𘳉 | 𘳊 | 𘳋 | 𘳌 | 𘳍 | 𘳎 | 𘳏 |
U+18CDx | 𘳐 | 𘳑 | 𘳒 | 𘳓 | 𘳔 | 𘳕 | ||||||||||
U+18CEx | ||||||||||||||||
U+18CFx | | |||||||||||||||
Notes |
The Old Turkic script was the alphabet used by the Göktürks and other early Turkic khanates from the 8th to 10th centuries to record the Old Turkic language.
In a written language, a logogram, also logograph or lexigraph, is a written character that represents a semantic component of a language, such as a word or morpheme. Chinese characters as used in Chinese as well as other languages are logograms, as are Egyptian hieroglyphs and characters in cuneiform script. A writing system that primarily uses logograms is called a logography. Non-logographic writing systems, such as alphabets and syllabaries, are phonemic: their individual symbols represent sounds directly and lack any inherent meaning. However, all known logographies have some phonetic component, generally based on the rebus principle, and the addition of a phonetic component to pure ideographs is considered to be a key innovation in enabling the writing system to adequately encode human language.
The Tungusic languages form a language family spoken in Eastern Siberia and Manchuria by Tungusic peoples. Many Tungusic languages are endangered. There are approximately 75,000 native speakers of the dozen living languages of the Tungusic language family. The term "Tungusic" is from an exonym for the Evenk people (Ewenki) used by the Yakuts ("tongus").
The Hungarian alphabet is an extension of the Latin alphabet used for writing the Hungarian language.
Khitan or Kitan, also known as Liao, is an extinct language once spoken in Northeast Asia by the Khitan people. It was the official language of the Liao Empire (907–1125) and the Qara Khitai (1124–1218). Owing to a narrow corpus of known words and a partially undeciphered script, the language has yet to be completely reconstructed.
The Jurchen language was the Tungusic language of the Jurchen people of eastern Manchuria, the rulers of the Jin dynasty in northern China of the 12th and 13th centuries. It is ancestral to the Manchu language. In 1635 Hong Taiji renamed the Jurchen ethnicity and language to "Manchu".
Anatolian hieroglyphs are an indigenous logographic script native to central Anatolia, consisting of some 500 signs. They were once commonly known as Hittite hieroglyphs, but the language they encode proved to be Luwian, not Hittite, and the term Luwian hieroglyphs is used in English publications. They are typologically similar to Egyptian hieroglyphs, but do not derive graphically from that script, and they are not known to have played the sacred role of hieroglyphs in Egypt. There is no demonstrable connection to Hittite cuneiform.
The Khitan large script was one of two writing systems used for the now-extinct Khitan language. It was used during the 10th–12th centuries by the Khitan people, who had created the Liao Empire in north-eastern China. In addition to the large script, the Khitans simultaneously also used a functionally independent writing system known as the Khitan small script. Both Khitan scripts continued to be in use to some extent by the Jurchens for several decades after the fall of the Liao dynasty, until the Jurchens fully switched to a script of their own. Examples of the scripts appeared most often on epitaphs and monuments, although other fragments sometimes surface.
András Róna-Tas is a Hungarian historian and linguist.
The Jurchen script was the writing system used to write the Jurchen language, the language of the Jurchen people who created the Jin Empire in northeastern China in the 12th–13th centuries. It was derived from the Khitan script, which in turn was derived from Chinese. The script has only been decoded to a small extent.
Aisin-Gioro Ulhicun is a Chinese linguist of Manchu ethnicity who is known for her studies of the Manchu, Jurchen and Khitan languages and scripts. She is also known as a historian of the Liao and Jin dynasties. Her works include a grammar of Manchu (1983), a dictionary of Jurchen (2003), and a study of Khitan memorial inscriptions (2005), as well as various studies on the phonology and grammar of the Khitan language.
Jin Guangping or Aisin-Gioro Hengxu (1899–1966) was a Chinese linguist of Manchu ethnicity who is known for his studies of the Jurchen and Khitan languages and scripts.
The Buyla inscription is a 9-word, 56-character inscription written in the Greek alphabet but in a non-Greek language. It is found on a golden buckled bowl or cup which is among the pieces of the Treasure of Nagyszentmiklós which are now in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna. The bowl is 12 cm in diameter and weighs 212 g, and has a handle or buckle, perhaps for hanging on a belt. The inscription is found around the outside of a circular design in the middle of the bowl. In the place where the inscription begins and ends, there is a cross. The inscription reads: ΒΟΥΗΛΑ·
Nova N 176 is an undeciphered manuscript codex held at the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts (IOM) of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Saint Petersburg, Russia. The manuscript, of uncertain provenance, entered the collection of the IOM in 1954, and for more than fifty years nobody was able to identify with certainty what language or script the text of the manuscript was written in. It was only in 2010 that IOM researcher Viacheslav Zaytsev was able to demonstrate that the manuscript is written in the Khitan large script, one of two largely undeciphered writing systems used for the now-extinct Khitan language during the 10th–12th centuries by the Khitan people, who founded the Liao Empire in north-eastern China.
The Bagam or Eghap script is a partially deciphered Cameroonian script of several hundred characters. It was invented by King Pufong of the Bagam (Eghap) people, c. 1900, and used for letters and records, though it was never in wide use. It is reputedly based on the Bamum script, though the numerals show more resemblance to Bamum than the syllabograms do, and it does not appear to be a direct descendant. The only attested example is a paper by Louis Malcolm, a British officer who served in Cameroon in World War I. This was published without the characters in 1921, and the manuscript with characters was deposited in the library of Cambridge University. This was published in full in Tuchscherer (1999).
Lajos Ligeti was a Hungarian orientalist and philologist, who specialized in Mongolian and Turkic languages.
Khitan names are the personal names of the Khitan people which ruled the Liao dynasty (907–1125) in ancient China and Kara-Khitan Khanate (1124–1218) in Central Asia. A nomadic Mongolic people, the Khitans have been extinct, making research on their cultures difficult. Currently, the Khitan language has largely not been deciphered, and the presence of 2 different writing systems - the Khitan large script and the Khitan small script, make research more difficult. The problem is compounded by the fact that most of the Liao history were recorded in written Chinese such as History of Liao, and transliteration into Chinese characters are not always standard even in modern days, much less in ancient days when the pronunciation is different as Chinese is logographic.