It has been suggested that this article be split into a new article titled Ancient North Arabian languages . (discuss) (November 2024) |
Ancient North Arabian | |
---|---|
Script type | |
Time period | 8th century BCE to 4th century CE |
Languages | Dadanitic, Taymanitic, Dumaitic, Thamudic, Safaitic, Hismaic |
Related scripts | |
Parent systems | Proto-Sinaitic script
|
Sister systems | Ancient South Arabian |
ISO 15924 | |
ISO 15924 | Narb(106),Old North Arabian (Ancient North Arabian) |
Unicode | |
Unicode alias | Old North Arabian |
U+10A80–U+10A9F |
Ancient North Arabian | |
---|---|
Native to | Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Yemen |
Region | Arabian Peninsula |
Extinct | 6th century |
Afroasiatic
| |
Ancient North Arabian | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | xna |
xna | |
Glottolog | anci1245 |
Ancient North Arabian (ANA) [1] [2] is a collection of scripts and a language or family of languages [3] under the North Arabian languages branch along with Old Arabic that were used in north and central Arabia and south Syria from the 8th century BCE to the 4th century CE. [4] The term "Ancient North Arabian" is defined negatively. It refers to all of the South Semitic scripts except Ancient South Arabian (ASA) regardless of their genetic relationships. [5]
Many scholars believed that the various ANA alphabets were derived from the ASA script, mainly because the latter was employed by a major civilization and exhibited more angular features. Others believed that the ANA and ASA scripts shared a common ancestor from which they both developed in parallel. Indeed, it seems unlikely that the various ANA scripts descend from the monumental ASA alphabet, but that they collectively share a common ancestor to the exclusion of ASA is also something which has yet to be demonstrated. [6]
The hypothesis that all ANA alphabets derive from a single ancestor gave rise to the idea that the languages which these scripts express constitute a linguistic unity, a so-called ANA language. As a hypothetical language or group of languages, Ancient North Arabian forms one branch of the North Arabian group, the other being Proto-Arabic. They are distinguished from each other by the definite article, which in Arabic is ʾal-, but in ANA is h-. They belong to a different branch of the Semitic languages than the Ancient South Arabian languages. [4]
The validity of this hypothesis has been called into question. [6] This is particularly the case for Taymanitic, which has been determined to be a Northwest Semitic language. [7] Safaitic and Hismaic are also now considered forms of Old Arabic due to shared features. [8]
The Ancient North Arabian scripts were used both in the oases (Dadanitic, Dumaitic, Taymanitic) and by the nomads (Hismaic, Safaitic, Thamudic B, C, D, and possibly Southern Thamudic aka Thamudic F) of central and northern Arabia. [9]
Dadanitic was the alphabet used by the inhabitants of the ancient oasis of Dadan (Biblical Dedān, modern Al-`Ula in north-west Saudi Arabia), probably some time during the second half of the first millennium BC. [10]
Dumaitic is the alphabet which seems to have been used by the inhabitants of the oasis known in antiquity as Dūma and later as Dumat Al-Jandal and al-Jawf. It lies in northern Saudi Arabia at the south-eastern end of the Wādī Sirḥān which leads up to the oasis of Azraq in north-eastern Jordan. According to the Assyrian annals Dūma was the seat of successive queens of the Arabs, some of whom were also priestesses, in the eighth and seventh centuries BC. [10]
Hasaitic is the name given to the inscriptions — mostly gravestones — which have been found in the huge oasis of Al-Hasa in north-eastern Saudi Arabia at sites like Thāj and Qatīf, with a few from more distant locations. They are carved in what may be an ANA dialect but expressed in a slightly adapted form of another member of the South Semitic script family, the Ancient South Arabian alphabet. [10]
Hismaic is the name given to the Old Arabic texts carved largely by nomads in the Ḥismā desert of what is now southern Jordan and north-west Saudi Arabia, though they are occasionally found in other places such as northern Jordan and parts of northern Saudi Arabia outside the Ḥismā. They are thought to date from roughly the same period as the Safaitic, i.e. first century BC to fourth century AD, though there is even less dating evidence in the case of Hismaic. [10]
Safaitic is the name given to the alphabet and variety of Old Arabic used by tens of thousands of ancient nomads in the deserts of what are now southern Syria, north-eastern Jordan, and northern Saudi Arabia. Occasionally, Safaitic texts are found further afield, in western Iraq, Lebanon, and even at Pompeii. They are thought to have been carved between the first century BC and the fourth century AD, though these limits can be no more than suggestions based on the fact that none of the approximately 35,000 texts known so far seems to mention anything earlier or later than these limits. [10]
Taymanitic is the name given to the variety of Northwest Semitic and ANA script used in the oasis of Tayma. This was an important stopping point on the caravan route from South Arabia to the Levant and Mesopotamia. The Taymanitic alphabet is probably mentioned as early as c. 800 BC when the regent of Carchemish (on what is now the Turkish-Syrian border) claimed to have learned it. About the same time an Assyrian official west of the Euphrates reported that he had ambushed a caravan of the people of Taymāʾ and Sabaʾ (an ancient South Arabian kingdom, Biblical Sheba) because it had tried to avoid paying tolls. There are two Taymanitic inscriptions dated to the mid-sixth century BC, since they mention the last king of Babylon, Nabonidus (556–539 BC), who spent ten years of his seventeen-year reign in Taymāʾ. [10]
Thamudic is a name invented by nineteenth-century scholars for large numbers of inscriptions in ANA alphabets which have not yet been properly studied. It does not imply that they were carved by members of the ancient tribe of Thamūd. These texts are found over a huge area from southern Syria to Yemen. In 1937, Fred V. Winnett divided those known at the time into five rough categories A, B, C, D, E. In 1951, some 9000 more inscriptions were recorded in south-west Saudi Arabia which have been given the name 'Southern Thamudic'. Further study by Winnett showed that the texts he had called 'Thamudic A' represent a clearly defined script and language and he therefore removed them from the Thamudic 'pending file' and gave them the name 'Taymanite', which was later changed to 'Taymanitic'. The same was done for 'Thamudic E' by Geraldine M.H. King, and this is now known as 'Hismaic'. However, Thamudic B, C, D and Southern Thamudic still await detailed study. [10]
Letter [11] | Phoneme | IPA | Corresponding letter in | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ancient South Arabian [11] | Phoenician | Arabic | |||||||||
𐪀 | h | [ h ] | 𐩠 | 𐤄 | ه | ||||||
𐪁 | l | [ l ] | 𐩡 | 𐤋 | ل | ||||||
𐪂 | ḥ | [ ħ ] | 𐩢 | 𐤇 | ح | ||||||
𐪍 | ḫ | [ x ] | 𐩭 | خ | |||||||
𐪃 | m | [ m ] | 𐩣 | 𐤌 | م | ||||||
𐪄 | q | [ q ] | 𐩤 | 𐤒 | ق | ||||||
𐪅 | w | [ w ], [ uː ] | 𐩥 | 𐤅 | و | ||||||
𐪛 | ṯ | [ θ ] | 𐩻 | 𐤔 | ث | ||||||
𐪆 | s² (ś) | [ ɬ ] | 𐩦 | ش | |||||||
𐪊 | s¹ (š) | [ ʃ ] | 𐩪 | س | |||||||
𐪏 | s³ (s) | [ s ] | 𐩯 | 𐤎 | |||||||
𐪇 | r | [ r ] | 𐩧 | 𐤓 | ر | ||||||
𐪈 | b | [ b ] | 𐩨 | 𐤁 | ب | ||||||
𐪉 | t | [ t ] | 𐩩 | 𐤕 | ت | ||||||
𐪋 | k | [ k ] | 𐩫 | 𐤊 | ك | ||||||
𐪌 | n | [ n ] | 𐩬 | 𐤍 | ن | ||||||
𐪜 | ẓ | [ θˤ ] | 𐩼 | 𐤑 | ظ | ||||||
𐪎 | ṣ | [ sˤ ] | 𐩮 | ص | |||||||
𐪓 | ḍ | [ dˤ ] | 𐩳 | ض | |||||||
𐪐 | f | [ f ] | 𐩰 | 𐤐 | ف | ||||||
𐪑 | [ʾ] Error: {{Transliteration}}: transliteration text not Latin script (pos 1) (help) | [ ʔ ] | 𐩱 | 𐤀 | ا | ||||||
𐪒 | [ʿ] Error: {{Transliteration}}: transliteration text not Latin script (pos 1) (help) | [ ʕ ] | 𐩲 | 𐤏 | ع | ||||||
𐪖 | ġ | [ ɣ ] | 𐩶 | غ | |||||||
𐪔 | g | [ g ] | 𐩴 | 𐤂 | ج | ||||||
𐪕 | d | [ d ] | 𐩵 | 𐤃 | د | ||||||
𐪗 | ṭ | [ tˤ ] | 𐩷 | 𐤈 | ط | ||||||
𐪘 | z | [ z ] | 𐩸 | 𐤆 | ز | ||||||
𐪙 | ḏ | [ ð ] | 𐩹 | ذ | |||||||
𐪚 | y | [ j ], [ iː ] | 𐩺 | 𐤉 | ي |
Old North Arabian script was added to the Unicode Standard in June 2014 with the release of version 7.0.
The Unicode block for Ancient North Arabian is U+10A80–U+10A9F:
Old North Arabian [1] Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF) | ||||||||||||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
U+10A8x | 𐪀 | 𐪁 | 𐪂 | 𐪃 | 𐪄 | 𐪅 | 𐪆 | 𐪇 | 𐪈 | 𐪉 | 𐪊 | 𐪋 | 𐪌 | 𐪍 | 𐪎 | 𐪏 |
U+10A9x | 𐪐 | 𐪑 | 𐪒 | 𐪓 | 𐪔 | 𐪕 | 𐪖 | 𐪗 | 𐪘 | 𐪙 | 𐪚 | 𐪛 | 𐪜 | 𐪝 | 𐪞 | 𐪟 |
Notes
|
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)Arabic is a Central Semitic language of the Afroasiatic language family spoken primarily in the Arab world. The ISO assigns language codes to 32 varieties of Arabic, including its standard form of Literary Arabic, known as Modern Standard Arabic, which is derived from Classical Arabic. This distinction exists primarily among Western linguists; Arabic speakers themselves generally do not distinguish between Modern Standard Arabic and Classical Arabic, but rather refer to both as al-ʿarabiyyatu l-fuṣḥā or simply al-fuṣḥā (اَلْفُصْحَىٰ).
Classical Arabic or Quranic Arabic is the standardized literary form of Arabic used from the 7th century and throughout the Middle Ages, most notably in Umayyad and Abbasid literary texts such as poetry, elevated prose and oratory, and is also the liturgical language of Islam. Classical Arabic is, furthermore, the register of the Arabic language on which Modern Standard Arabic is based.
Tayma is a large oasis with a long history of settlement, located in northwestern Saudi Arabia at the point where the trade route between Medina and Dumah (Sakakah) begins to cross the Nafud desert. Tayma is located 264 km (164 mi) southeast of the city of Tabuk, and about 400 km (250 mi) north of Medina. It is located in the western part of the Nafud desert.
The Arabic alphabet is thought to be traced back to a Nabataean variation of the Aramaic alphabet, known as Nabataean Aramaic. This script itself descends from the Phoenician alphabet, an ancestral alphabet that additionally gave rise to the Hebrew and Greek alphabets. Nabataean Aramaic evolved into Nabataean Arabic, so-called because it represents a transitional phase between the known recognizably Aramaic and Arabic scripts. Nabataean Arabic was succeeded by Paleo-Arabic, termed as such because it dates to the pre-Islamic period in the fifth and sixth centuries CE, but is also recognizable in light of the Arabic script as expressed during the Islamic era. Finally, the standardization of the Arabic alphabet during the Islamic era led to the emergence of classical Arabic. The phase of the Arabic alphabet today is known as Modern Standard Arabic, although classical Arabic survives as a "high" variety as part of a diglossia.
Northwest Semitic is a division of the Semitic languages comprising the indigenous languages of the Levant. It emerged from Proto-Semitic in the Early Bronze Age. It is first attested in proper names identified as Amorite in the Middle Bronze Age. The oldest coherent texts are in Ugaritic, dating to the Late Bronze Age, which by the time of the Bronze Age collapse are joined by Old Aramaic, and by the Iron Age by Sutean and the Canaanite languages.
Thamudic, named for the Thamud tribe, is a group of epigraphic scripts known from large numbers of inscriptions in Ancient North Arabian (ANA) alphabets, which have not yet been properly studied. These texts are found over a huge area from southern Syria to Yemen. In 1937, Fred V. Winnett divided those known at the time into five rough categories A, B, C, D, E. In 1951, some 9,000 more inscriptions were recorded in south-west Saudi Arabia which have been given the name Southern Thamudic.
Safaitic is a variety of the South Semitic scripts used by the Arabs in southern Syria and northern Jordan in the Ḥarrah region, to carve rock inscriptions in various dialects of Old Arabic and Ancient North Arabian. The Safaitic script is a member of the Ancient North Arabian (ANA) sub-grouping of the South Semitic script family, the genetic unity of which has yet to be demonstrated.
Lihyan, also called Dadān or Dedan, was a powerful and highly organized ancient Arab kingdom that played a vital cultural and economic role in the north-western region of the Arabian Peninsula and used Dadanitic language. The Lihyanites ruled over a large domain from Yathrib in the south and parts of the Levant in the north.
Nabataean Aramaic is the extinct Aramaic variety used in inscriptions by the Nabataeans of the East Bank of the Jordan River, the Negev, and the Sinai Peninsula. Compared with other varieties of Aramaic, it is notable for the occurrence of a number of loanwords and grammatical borrowings from Arabic or other North Arabian languages.
Hismaic is a variety of the Ancient North Arabian script and the language most commonly expressed in it. The Hismaic script may have been used to write Safaitic dialects of Old Arabic, but the language of most inscriptions differs from Safaitic in a few important respects, meriting its classification as a separate dialect or language. Hismaic inscriptions are attested in the Ḥismā region of Northwest Arabia, dating to the centuries around and immediately following the start of the Common Era.
Old Arabic is the name for any Arabic language or dialect continuum before Islam. Various forms of Old Arabic are attested in scripts like Safaitic, Hismaic, Nabatean, and even Greek.
Dadanitic is the script and possibly the language of the oasis of Dadān and the kingdom of Liḥyān in northwestern Arabia, spoken probably some time during the second half of the first millennium BCE.
Proto-Arabic is the name given to the hypothetical reconstructed ancestor of all the varieties of Arabic attested since the 9th century BC. There are two lines of evidence to reconstruct Proto-Arabic:
The South Semitic scripts are a family of alphabets that had split from Proto-Sinaitic script by the 10th century BC. The family has two main branches: Ancient North Arabian (ANA) and Ancient South Arabian (ASA).
Taymanitic was the language and script of the oasis of Taymāʾ in northwestern Arabia, dated to the second half of the 6th century BC.
Nabataean Arabic was a predecessor of the Arabic alphabet. It evolved from Nabataean Aramaic, first entering use in the late third century AD. It continued to be used into the mid-fifth century, after which the script evolves into a new phase known as Paleo-Arabic.
Thamudic B is a Central Semitic language and script concentrated in northwestern Arabia, with attestations in Syria, Egypt, and Yemen. As a poorly understood form of Ancient North Arabian, it is included in the Thamudic category. Mentions of the king of Babylon and the Nabataean god Dushara show that Thamudic B was written over a span of centuries, ranging at least from the seventh or sixth to fourth centuries BCE.
David F. Graf, is an American historian, archeologist, academic and author. He is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Miami.
Paleo-Arabic is a script that represents a pre-Islamic phase in the evolution of the Arabic script at which point it becomes recognizably similar to the Islamic Arabic script. It comes prior to Classical Arabic, but it is also a recognizable form of the Arabic script, emerging after a transitional phase of Nabataean Arabic as the Nabataean script slowly evolved into the modern Arabic script. It appears in the late fifth and sixth centuries AD and, though was originally only known from Syria and Jordan, is now also attested in several extant inscriptions from the Arabian Peninsula, such as in the Christian texts at the site of Hima in South Arabia. More recently, additional examples of Paleo-Arabic have been discovered near Taif in the Hejaz and in the Tabuk region of northwestern Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Al-Jallad is a Jordanian-American philologist, epigraphist, and a historian of language. Some of the areas he has contributed to include Quranic studies and the history of Arabic, including recent work he has done on the Safaitic and Paleo-Arabic scripts. He is currently Professor in the Sofia Chair in Arabic Studies at Ohio State University at the Department of Near Eastern and South Asian Languages and Cultures. He is the winner of the 2017 Dutch Gratama Science Prize.