Old Arabic | |
---|---|
የበ𐪇Ⲟ | |
Pronunciation | [ʕr͇b] |
Region | Northwestern Arabian Peninsula and the southern Levant |
Era | Early 1st millennium BCE to 7th century CE |
Afroasiatic
| |
Early form | |
Safaitic Hismaic Dadanitic Nabataean Phoenician Arabic Greek | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | None (mis ) |
Glottolog | None |
Old Arabic is the name for any Arabic language or dialect continuum before Islam. [1] Various forms of Old Arabic are attested in scripts like Safaitic, Hismaic, Nabatean, and even Greek. [2]
Alternatively, the term has been used synonymously with "Paleo-Arabic" to describe the form of the Arabic script in the fifth and sixth centuries. [3]
Old Arabic and its descendants are classified as Central Semitic languages, which is an intermediate language group containing the Northwest Semitic languages (e.g., Aramaic and Hebrew), the languages of the Dadanitic, Taymanitic inscriptions, the poorly understood languages labeled Thamudic, and the ancient languages of Yemen written in the Ancient South Arabian script. Old Arabic, is however, distinguished from all of them by the following innovations: [4]
The oldest known attestation of the Arabic language dubbed as pre-Historic Arabic language is a bi-lingual inscription written in Old Arabic which was written in the undifferentiated North Arabian script (known as Thamudic B) and Canaanite which remains undeciphered, discovered in Bayir, Jordan. [2]
Transliteration + Transcription + Translation |
---|
(1) h haː mlkm malkamu w wa kms1 kamaːsu w wa qws1 kʼawsu b bi km kumu ʿwḏn ʕawuðnaː |
A characteristic of Nabataean Arabic and Old Hijazi (from which Classical Arabic much later developed) is the definite article al-. The first unambiguous literary attestation of this feature occurs in the 5th century BCE, in the epithet of a goddess which Herodotus ( Histories I: 131, III: 8) quotes in its preclassical Arabic form as Alilat (Ἀλιλάτ, i. e.,ʼal-ʼilāt), which means "the goddess". [6] An early piece of inscriptional evidence for this form of the article is provided by a 1st-century BCE inscription in Qaryat al-Faw (formerly Qaryat Dhat Kahil, near Sulayyil, Saudi Arabia). [7] [8] [9]
The earliest datable Safaitic inscriptions go back to the 3rd century BCE, but the vast majority of texts are undatable and so may stretch back much further in time. [1]
Aramaic ostraca dated 362–301 BC bear witness to the presence of people of Edomite origin in the southern Shephelah and the Beersheva Valley before the Hellenistic period. They contain personal names that can be defined as Arabic on the basis of their linguistic features: [10]
Hismaic inscriptions, contemporaneous with the Nabatean Kingdom attest a variety of Old Arabic which may have merged [ð] with [d]. Furthermore, there are 52 Hismaic inscriptions which attest the formula ḏkrt lt[ðakarat allaːtu][ citation needed ] "May Allāt be mindful of", foreshadowing similar formulae which are attested in Christian contexts from northern Syria to northern Arabia during the 6th and possibly 7th centuries CE. One such inscription, found near Wadi Rum, is given below:
Transliteration + Transcription + Translation |
---|
l *Li- ʼbs1lm ʼabs¹alām bn bin qymy qayyemyV d dū/ī ʼl ʼāl gs2m gas²m w uwa dkrt-n dakaratn lt āllāt w uwa dkrt dakarat ltws2yʽ-n allāt uwa s²yaʽnā kll-hm kulilhum By Absalām son of Qayyimyā of the lineage of Gašmū. And may (A)llāt be mindful of us and may (A)llāt be mindful of all our companions. |
The En Avdat inscription dates to no later than 150 CE, and contains a prayer to the deified Nabataean king Obodas I: [12]
Transliteration + Transcription + Translation |
---|
(1) pypʿl pajepʕal lʾ laː pdʾ pedaːʔ w wa lʾ laː ʾṯrʾ ʔaθara And he acts neither for benefit nor favour (2) pkn pakaːn hnʾ honaː ybʿnʾ jabɣenaː ʾlmwtw ʔalmawto lʾ laː and if death claims us let me not (3) ʾbʿh ʔabɣæːh pkn pakaːn hnʾ honaː ʾrd ʔaraːd grḥw gorħo lʾ laː yrdnʾ jorednaː be claimed. And if an affliction occurs let it not afflict us |
The earliest 6th-century Arabic inscription is from Zabad (512), a town near Aleppo. The Arabic inscription consists of a list of names carved on the lowest part of the lintel of a martyrion dedicated to Saint Sergius, the upper parts of which are occupied by inscriptions in Greek and Syriac. [13]
Transliteration + Transcription (tentative) + Translation |
---|
[ḏ ]{k}r ðakar ʾl-ʾlh ʔalʔelaːh srgw serg(o) BR ebn ʾmt-mnfw ʔamat manaːp(o) w wa h{l/n}yʾ haniːʔ BR ebn mrʾlqys marʔalqajs [Roundel]
w wa srgw serg(o) BR ebn sʿdw saʕd(o) w wa syrw ⟨syrw⟩ w wa s{.}ygw ⟨sygw⟩ "May God be mindful of Sirgū son of ʾAmt-Manāfū and Ha{l/n}īʾ son of Maraʾ l-Qays and Sirgū son of Saʿdū and Š/Syrw and Š/S{.}ygw" |
Two Arabic inscriptions, the Jebel Usays inscription (528) and the Harran inscription (568), are from the southern region on the borders of Hauran.
The Qur'an, as standardized by Uthman [14] (r. 644 – 656), is the first Arabic codex still extant, and the first non-inscriptional attestation of the Old Hijazi dialect. The Birmingham Quran manuscript was radiocarbon dated to between 568 and 645 CE, and contains parts of chapters 18, 19, and 20.
PERF 558 (643 CE) is the oldest Islamic Arabic text, the first Islamic papyrus, and attests the continuation of wawation into the Islamic period.
The Zuhayr inscription (644 CE) is the oldest Islamic rock inscription. [15] It references the death of Umar, and is notable for its fully fledged system of dotting.
A Christian Arabic inscription, known as the Yazid inscription, possibly mentions Yazid I and is notable for its continuation of 6th century Christian Arabic formulae as well as maintaining pre-Islamic letter shapes and wawation. [16]
Labial | Dental | Denti-alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Pharyngeal | Glottal | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
plain | emphatic | plain | emphatic | plain | emphatic | ||||||
Nasal | [m] m – م | [n] n – ن | |||||||||
Stop | voiceless | [pʰ] p – ف | [tʰ] t – ت | [tʼ] ṭ – ط | [kʰ] k – ك | [kʼ] q – ق | [ ʔ ] ʾ – ء | ||||
voiced | [b] b – ب | [d] d – د | [ g ] g – ج | ||||||||
Fricative | voiceless | [ θ ] ṯ – ث | [tθʼ] [a] ẓ – ظ | [s] s – س | [tsʼ] ṣ – ص | [x] ẖ – خ | [ ħ ] ḥ – ح | [ h ] h – ه | |||
voiced | [ ð ] ḏ – ذ | [z] z – ز | [ɣ] ġ – غ | [ ʕ ] ʿ – ع | |||||||
Lateral fricative | [ ɬ ] s2 – ش | [tɬʼ] [a] ḍ – ض | |||||||||
Lateral | [ l ] l – ل | ||||||||||
Trill | [ r ] r – ر | ||||||||||
Approximant | [ j ] y – ي | [ w ] w – و |
In contrast with Old Higazi and Classical Arabic, Nabataean Arabic may have undergone the shift /e/ < */i/ and /o/ < */u/, as evidenced by the numerous Greek transcriptions of Arabic from the area. This may have occurred in Safaitic as well, making it a possible Northern Old Arabic isogloss. |
In contrast to Classical Arabic, Old Higazi had the phonemes /eː/ and /oː/, which arose from the contraction of Old Arabic /ajV/ and /awV/, in which V was a short unstressed vowel, respectively. The reduction of /eː/ in closed syllables resulted in either short /a/ or /e/. [17] |
Triptote | Diptote | Dual | Plural | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Masculine | Feminine | ||||
Nominative | -un | -u | -āni | -ūna | -ātun |
Accusative | -an | -a | -ayni | -īna | -ātin |
Genitive | -in |
The ʿEn ʿAvdat inscription in the Nabataean script dating to no later than 150 CE shows that final [n] had been deleted in undetermined triptotes, and that the final short vowels of the determined state were intact. The Old Arabic of the Nabataean inscriptions exhibits almost exclusively the form ʾl- of the definite article. Unlike Classical Arabic, this ʾl almost never exhibits the assimilation of the coda to the coronals.
Triptote | Diptote | Dual | Plural | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Masculine | Feminine | ||||
Nominative | (ʾal-)...-o | -∅ | (ʾal-)...-ān | (ʾal-)...-ūn | (ʾal-)...-āto? |
Accusative | (ʾal-)...-a | (ʾal-)...-ayn | (ʾal-)...-īn | (ʾal-)...-āte? | |
Genitive | (ʾal-)...-e |
Example:
The A1 inscription dated to the 3rd or 4th century in a Greek alphabet in a dialect showing affinities to that of the Safaitic inscriptions shows that short final high vowels had been lost, obliterating the distinction between nominative and genitive case in the singular, leaving the accusative the only marked case. [19] Besides dialects with no definite article, the Safaitic inscriptions exhibit about four different article forms, ordered by frequency: h-, ʾ-, ʾl-, and hn-. Unlike the Classical Arabic article, the Old Arabic ʾl almost never exhibits the assimilation of the coda to the coronals; the same situation is attested in the Graeco-Arabica, but in A1 the coda assimilates to the following d, αδαυρα */ʾad-dawra/ 'the region'. The Safaitic and Hismaic texts attest an invariable feminine consonantal -t ending, and the same appears to be true of the earliest Nabataean Arabic. While Greek transcriptions show a mixed situation, it is clear that by the 4th c. CE, the ending had shifted to /-a(h)/ in non-construct position in the settled areas. [2]
Triptote | Diptote | Dual | Plural | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Masculine | Feminine | ||||
Nominative | (ʾal-)...-∅ | -∅ | (ʾal-)...-ān | (ʾal-)...-ūn | (ʾal-)...-āt |
Accusative | (ʾal-)...-a | (ʾal-)...-ayn | (ʾal-)...-īn | ||
Genitive | (ʾal-)...-∅ |
Example:
The Qur'anic Consonantal Text shows no case distinction with determined triptotes, but the indefinite accusative is marked with a final /ʾ/. In JSLih 384, an early example of Old Hijazi, the Proto-Central Semitic /-t/ allomorph survives in bnt as opposed to /-ah/ < /-at/ in s1lmh.
Triptote | Diptote | Dual | Plural | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Masculine | Feminine | |||||
Nominative | -∅ | ʾal-...-∅ | -∅ | (ʾal-)...-ān | (ʾal-)...-ūn | (ʾal-)...-āt |
Accusative | -ā | (ʾal-)...-ayn | (ʾal-)...-īn | |||
Genitive | -∅ |
Masc | Fem | Plural |
---|---|---|
ḏ, ḏ(y/n) | t, ḏ | ʾly */olay/ [20] |
Northern Old Arabic preserved the original shape of the relative pronoun ḏ-, which may either have continued to inflect for case or have become frozen as ḏū or ḏī. In one case, it is preceded by the article/demonstrative prefix h-, hḏ */haḏḏV/. [21]
In Safaitic, the existence of mood inflection is confirmed in the spellings of verbs with y/w as the third root consonant. Verbs of this class in result clauses are spelled in such a way that they must have originally terminated in /a/: f ygzy nḏr-h */pa yagziya naḏra-hu/ 'that he may fulfill his vow'. Sometimes verbs terminate in a -n which may reflect an energic ending, thus, s2ʿ-nh 'join him' perhaps */śeʿannoh/. [2]
Old Ḥiǧāzī is characterized by the innovative relative pronoun ʾallaḏī, ʾallatī, etc., which is attested once in JSLih 384 and is the common form in the QCT. [4]
The QCT along with the papyri of the first century after the Islamic conquests attest a form with an l-element between the demonstrative base and the distal particle, producing from the original proximal set ḏālika and tilka.
The texts composed in both scripts are almost 50,000 specimens that provide a rather detailed view of Old Arabic. [2]
A single text, JSLih 384, composed in the Dadanitic script, from northwest Arabia, provides the only non-Nabataean example of Old Arabic from the Hijaz. [2]
Fragmentary evidence in the Greek script, the "Graeco-Arabica", is equally crucial to help complete our understanding of Old Arabic. It encompasses instances of Old Arabic in Greek transcription from documentary sources. The advantage of the Greek script is that it gives us a clear view of the vowels of Old Arabic and can shed important light on the phonetic realization of the Old Arabic phonemes. Finally, a single pre-Islamic Arabic text composed in Greek letters is known, labelled A1. [2]
Only two texts composed fully in Arabic have been discovered in the Nabataean script. The En Avdat inscription contains two lines of an Arabic prayer or hymn embedded in an Aramaic votive inscription. The second is the Namarah inscription, 328 CE, which was erected about 60 miles (97 km) southeast of Damascus. Most examples of Arabic come from the substratal influence the language exercised on Nabataean Aramaic. [2]
A growing corpus of texts carved in a script in between Classical Nabataean Aramaic and what is now called the Arabic script from Northwest Arabia provides further lexical and some morphological material for the later stages of Old Arabic in this region. The texts provide important insights as to the development of the Arabic script from its Nabataean forebear and are an important glimpse of the Old Ḥigāzī dialects. [2]
Only three rather short inscriptions in the fully evolved Arabic script are known from the pre-Islamic period. They come from 6th century CE Syria, two from the southern region on the borders of Hawran, Jabal Usays (528 CE) and Harran (568 CE), and one from Zabad (512 CE), a town near Aleppo. They shed little light on the linguistic character of Arabic and are more interesting for the information they provide on the evolution of the Arabic script. [2]
Arabic is a Central Semitic language of the Afroasiatic language family spoken primarily in the Arab world. The ISO assigns language codes to 32 varieties of Arabic, including its standard form of Literary Arabic, known as Modern Standard Arabic, which is derived from Classical Arabic. This distinction exists primarily among Western linguists; Arabic speakers themselves generally do not distinguish between Modern Standard Arabic and Classical Arabic, but rather refer to both as al-ʿarabiyyatu l-fuṣḥā or simply al-fuṣḥā (اَلْفُصْحَىٰ).
The Arabic alphabet, or the Arabic abjad, is the Arabic script as specifically codified for writing the Arabic language. It is written from right-to-left in a cursive style, and includes 28 letters, of which most have contextual letterforms. The Arabic alphabet is considered an abjad, with only consonants required to be written; due to its optional use of diacritics to notate vowels, it is considered an impure abjad.
The Nabataeans or Nabateans were an ancient Arab people who inhabited northern Arabia and the southern Levant. Their settlements—most prominently the assumed capital city of Raqmu —gave the name Nabatene to the Arabian borderland that stretched from the Euphrates to the Red Sea.
Classical Arabic or Quranic Arabic is the standardized literary form of Arabic used from the 7th century and throughout the Middle Ages, most notably in Umayyad and Abbasid literary texts such as poetry, elevated prose and oratory, and is also the liturgical language of Islam. Classical Arabic is, furthermore, the register of the Arabic language on which Modern Standard Arabic is based.
Dushara, also transliterated as Dusares, is a pre-Islamic Arabian god worshipped by the Nabataeans at Petra and Madain Saleh. Safaitic inscriptions imply he was the son of the goddess Al-Lat, and that he assembled in the heavens with other deities. He is called "Dushara from Petra" in one inscription. Dushara was expected to bring justice if called by the correct ritual.
The Arabic alphabet is thought to be traced back to a Nabataean variation of the Aramaic alphabet, known as Nabataean Aramaic. This script itself descends from the Phoenician alphabet, an ancestral alphabet that additionally gave rise to the Hebrew and Greek alphabets. Nabataean Aramaic evolved into Nabataean Arabic, so-called because it represents a transitional phase between the known recognizably Aramaic and Arabic scripts. Nabataean Arabic was succeeded by Paleo-Arabic, termed as such because it dates to the pre-Islamic period in the fifth and sixth centuries CE, but is also recognizable in light of the Arabic script as expressed during the Islamic era. Finally, the standardization of the Arabic alphabet during the Islamic era led to the emergence of classical Arabic. The phase of the Arabic alphabet today is known as Modern Standard Arabic, although classical Arabic survives as a "high" variety as part of a diglossia.
Thamudic, named for the Thamud tribe, is a group of epigraphic scripts known from large numbers of inscriptions in Ancient North Arabian (ANA) alphabets, which have not yet been properly studied. These texts are found over a huge area from southern Syria to Yemen. In 1937, Fred V. Winnett divided those known at the time into five rough categories A, B, C, D, E. In 1951, some 9,000 more inscriptions were recorded in south-west Saudi Arabia which have been given the name Southern Thamudic.
Safaitic is a variety of the South Semitic scripts used by the Arabs in southern Syria and northern Jordan in the Ḥarrah region, to carve rock inscriptions in various dialects of Old Arabic and Ancient North Arabian. The Safaitic script is a member of the Ancient North Arabian (ANA) sub-grouping of the South Semitic script family, the genetic unity of which has yet to be demonstrated.
Ancient North Arabian (ANA) is a collection of scripts and a language or family of languages under the North Arabian languages branch along with Old Arabic that were used in north and central Arabia and south Syria from the 8th century BCE to the 4th century CE. The term "Ancient North Arabian" is defined negatively. It refers to all of the South Semitic scripts except Ancient South Arabian (ASA) regardless of their genetic relationships.
Nabataean Aramaic is the extinct Aramaic variety used in inscriptions by the Nabataeans of the East Bank of the Jordan River, the Negev, and the Sinai Peninsula. Compared with other varieties of Aramaic, it is notable for the occurrence of a number of loanwords and grammatical borrowings from Arabic or other North Arabian languages.
Hismaic is a variety of the Ancient North Arabian script and the language most commonly expressed in it. The Hismaic script may have been used to write Safaitic dialects of Old Arabic, but the language of most inscriptions differs from Safaitic in a few important respects, meriting its classification as a separate dialect or language. Hismaic inscriptions are attested in the Ḥismā region of Northwest Arabia, dating to the centuries around and immediately following the start of the Common Era.
Proto-Arabic is the name given to the hypothetical reconstructed ancestor of all the varieties of Arabic attested since the 9th century BC. There are two lines of evidence to reconstruct Proto-Arabic:
The South Semitic scripts are a family of alphabets that had split from Proto-Sinaitic script by the 10th century BC. The family has two main branches: Ancient North Arabian (ANA) and Ancient South Arabian (ASA).
Taymanitic was the language and script of the oasis of Taymāʾ in northwestern Arabia, dated to the second half of the 6th century BC.
Nabataean Arabic was a predecessor of the Arabic alphabet. It evolved from Nabataean Aramaic, first entering use in the late third century AD. It continued to be used into the mid-fifth century, after which the script evolves into a new phase known as Paleo-Arabic.
Old Hijazi, is a variety of Old Arabic attested in Hejaz from about the 1st century to the 7th century. It is the variety thought to underlie the Quranic Consonantal Text (QCT) and in its later iteration was the prestige spoken and written register of Arabic in the Umayyad Caliphate.
David F. Graf, is an American historian, archeologist, academic and author. He is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Miami.
Paleo-Arabic is a script that represents a pre-Islamic phase in the evolution of the Arabic script at which point it becomes recognizably similar to the Islamic Arabic script. It comes prior to Classical Arabic, but it is also a recognizable form of the Arabic script, emerging after a transitional phase of Nabataean Arabic as the Nabataean script slowly evolved into the modern Arabic script. It appears in the late fifth and sixth centuries AD and, though was originally only known from Syria and Jordan, is now also attested in several extant inscriptions from the Arabian Peninsula, such as in the Christian texts at the site of Hima in South Arabia. More recently, additional examples of Paleo-Arabic have been discovered near Taif in the Hejaz and in the Tabuk region of northwestern Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Al-Jallad is a Jordanian-American philologist, epigraphist, and a historian of language. Some of the areas he has contributed to include Quranic studies and the history of Arabic, including recent work he has done on the Safaitic and Paleo-Arabic scripts. He is currently Professor in the Sofia Chair in Arabic Studies at Ohio State University at the Department of Near Eastern and South Asian Languages and Cultures. He is the winner of the 2017 Dutch Gratama Science Prize.
A short Aramaic inscription on basalt was discovered at al-Mal in Syria in 1973. The inscribed basalt block had been cut by builders for use in a modern building. The text is not entirely preserved. It was discovered and photographed by an Israeli expedition following the Yom Kippur War.