Agkistrodon piscivorus is a species of venomous snake, a pit viper in the subfamily Crotalinae of the familyViperidae. It is one of the world's few semiaquatic vipers (along with the Florida cottonmouth), and is native to the Southeastern United States.[5] As an adult, it is large and capable of delivering a painful and potentially fatal bite. When threatened, it may respond by coiling its body and displaying its fangs.[6] Individuals may bite when feeling threatened or being handled in any way.[7] It tends to be found in or near water, particularly in slow-moving and shallow lakes, streams, and marshes. It is a capable swimmer, and like several species of snakes, is known to occasionally enter bays and estuaries and swim between barrier islands and the mainland.[8]:211 p.
The generic name is derived from the Greek words ἄγκιστρονankistron "fish-hook, hook"[9] and ὀδώνodon "tooth",[10] and the specific name comes from the Latinpiscis 'fish'[11] and voro '(I) eat greedily, devour';[12] thus, the scientific name translates to "hook-toothed fish-eater".[13]Common names include cottonmouth, northern cottonmouth, water moccasin, swamp moccasin, black moccasin, and simply viper.[14] Many of the common names refer to the threat display, in which this species often stands its ground and gapes at an intruder, exposing the white lining of its mouth. Many scientists dislike the use of the term water moccasin since it can lead to confusion between the venomous cottonmouth and nonvenomous water snakes.[15]
Description
Agkistrodon piscivorus is the largest species of the genus Agkistrodon. Adults commonly exceed 80cm (31in) in total length (including tail); females are typically smaller than males. Total length, per one study of adults, was 65 to 90cm (26 to 35in).[16] Average body mass has been found to be 292.5 to 579.6g (10.32 to 20.44oz) in males and 201.1 to 254.1g (7.09 to 8.96oz) in females.[17][18] Occasionally, individuals may exceed 180cm (71in) in total length, especially in the eastern part of the range.[19]
Although larger ones have purportedly been seen in the wild,[20] according to Gloyd and Conant (1990), the largest recorded specimen of A. p. piscivorus was 188cm (74in) in total length,[21] based on a specimen caught in the Dismal Swamp region and given to the Philadelphia Zoological Garden. This snake had apparently been injured during capture, died several days later, and was measured when straight and relaxed.[8] Large specimens can be extremely bulky, with the mass of a specimen of about 180cm (71in) in total length known to weigh 4.6kg (10lb).[22]
Interestingly, many would assume that the morphology of an aquatic snake should have a small, narrow head that tapers towards the back to minimize drag in the water, especially when capturing prey. However, the pit vipers, and particularly Cottonmouths, display a contradicting structure, with its bulky, triangular head, which would be assumed to be poorly suited to water, yet it is not the case.[23]
The broad head is distinct from the neck, and the snout is blunt in profile with the rim of the top of the head extending forwards slightly further than the mouth. Substantial cranial plates are present, although the parietal plates are often fragmented, especially towards the rear. A loreal scale is absent. Six to 9 supralabials and eight to 12 infralabials are seen. At midbody, it has 23–27 rows of dorsal scales.[19] All dorsal scale rows have keels, although those on the lowermost scale rows are weak.[8] In males/females, the ventral scales number 130-145/128-144 and the subcaudals 38-54/36-50. Many of the latter may be divided.[19]
Juvenile cottonmouth
Though most specimens are almost or even totally black, (with the exception of the head and facial markings), the color pattern may consist of a brown, gray, tan, yellowish-olive, or blackish ground color, which is overlaid with a series of 10–17 dark brown to almost black crossbands. These crossbands, which usually have black edges, are sometimes broken along the dorsal midline to form a series of staggered halfbands on either side of the body. These crossbands are visibly lighter in the center, almost matching the ground color, often contain irregular dark markings, and extend well down onto the ventral scales. The dorsal banding pattern fades with age, so older individuals are an almost uniform olive-brown, grayish-brown, or black. The belly is white, yellowish-white, or tan, marked with dark spots, and becomes darker posteriorly. The amount of dark pigment on the belly varies from virtually none to almost completely black. The head is a more or less uniform brown color, especially in A. p. piscivorus. Subadult specimens may exhibit the same kind of dark, parietal spots characteristic of A. contortrix, but sometimes these are still visible in adults. Eastern populations have a broad, dark, postocular stripe, bordered with pale pigment above and below, that is faint or absent in western populations. The underside of the head is generally whitish, cream, or tan.[19]
Juvenile and subadult specimens generally have a more contrasting color pattern, with dark crossbands on a lighter ground color. The ground color is then tan, brown, or reddish-brown. The tip of the tail is usually yellowish, becoming greenish-yellow or greenish in subadults, and then black in adults. On some juveniles, the banding pattern can also be seen on the tail.[19] Young snakes wiggle the tips of their tails to lure prey animals.[24]
This species is often confused with the copperhead, A. contortrix. This is especially true for juveniles, but differences exist. A. piscivorus has broad, dark stripes on the sides of its head that extend back from the eyes, whereas A. contortrix has only a thin, dark line that divides the pale supralabials from the somewhat darker color of the head. The watersnakes of the genus Nerodia are also similar in appearance, being thick-bodied with large heads, but they have round pupils, no loreal pit, a single anal plate, subcaudal scales that are divided throughout, and a distinctive overall color pattern.[19]
Common names
This is a list of common names for A. piscivorus, some of which also refer to other species:
Geographic distribution of the two species of cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus and Agkistrodon conanti
A. piscivorus is found in the eastern US from the Great Dismal Swamp in southeast Virginia, south through the Florida peninsula and west to Arkansas, eastern and southern Oklahoma, and western and southern Georgia (excluding Lake Lanier and Lake Allatoona[25]). A few records exist of the species being found along the Rio Grande in Texas, but these are thought to represent disjunct populations, now possibly eradicated. The type locality given is "Carolina", although Schmidt (1953) proposed this be restricted to the area around Charleston, South Carolina.[4] Snakes observed in the northern areas of this range are typically larger older individuals.[26]
In Georgia, it is found in the southern half of the state up to a few kilometers north of the Fall Line with few exceptions. Its range also includes the Ohio River Valley as far north as southern Indiana, and it inhabits many barrier islands off the coasts of the states where it is found.[19]
Conservation status
The species A. piscivorus is classified as least concern on the IUCN Red List (v3.1, 2007).[3] Species are listed as such due to their wide distribution, presumed large population, or because they are unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category. When last assessed in 2007, the population trend was stable.[27]
Constant persecution of the species and drainage of wetland habitat prior to development has taken a heavy toll on local populations. Despite this, it remains a common species in many areas.[8][28]
Agkistrodon piscivorus is the most aquatic species of the genus Agkistrodon, and is usually associated with bodies of water, such as creeks, streams, marshes, swamps, and the shores of ponds and lakes.[19] This species is pretty unique from others of its commonly confused species as cottonmouths appear to be floating on top of the water rather than swimming with its body beneath the surface.[30] The U.S. Navy (1991) describes it as inhabiting swamps, shallow lakes, and sluggish streams, but it is usually not found in swift, deep, cool water.[31]Behler and King (1979) list its habitats as including lowland swamps, lakes, rivers, bayheads, sloughs, irrigation ditches, canals, rice fields, and small, clear, rocky, mountain streams.[32]
It is also found in brackish-water habitats and is sometimes seen swimming in salt water. It has been much more successful at colonizing Atlantic and Gulf Coast barrier islands than the copperhead. Even on these islands, though, it tends to favor freshwater marshes. A study by Dunson and Freda (1985) describes it as not being particularly salt-tolerant.[19]
The snake is not limited to aquatic habitats, however, as Gloyd and Conant (1990) mentioned large specimens have been found more than a mile (1.6km) from water.[8] In various locations, the species is well-adapted to less moist environments, such as palmetto thickets, pine-palmetto forest, pine woods in East Texas, pine flatwoods in Florida, eastern deciduous dune forest, dune and beach areas, riparian forest, and prairies.[19]
Behavior
A. p. piscivorus – gaping is part of the typical defensive display, the white mouth giving it the nickname "cottonmouth".A cottonmouth in water in Tennessee– the high position in the water and upward-tilted head can help distinguish it from Nerodia watersnakes such as the common watersnake, although there is substantial similarity.A common watersnake (Nerodia sipedon) swimming– a nonvenomous species, is often mistaken for the cottonmouth.
In tests designed to measure the various behavioral responses by wild specimens to encounters with people, 23 of 45 (51%) tried to escape, while 28 of 36 (78%) resorted to threat displays and other defensive tactics. Only when they were picked up with a mechanical hand were they likely to bite.[33]
When sufficiently stressed or threatened, this species engages in a characteristic threat display that includes vibrating its tail and throwing its head back with its mouth open to display the startlingly white interior,[28] often making a loud hiss while the neck and front part of the body are pulled into an S-shaped position.[34] Many of its common names, including "cottonmouth" and "gaper", refer to this behavior, while its habit of snapping its jaws shut when anything touches its mouth has earned it the name "trap jaw" in some areas.[35] Other defensive responses can include flattening the body[34] and emitting a strong, pungent secretion from the anal glands located at the base of the tail.[19] This musk may be ejected in thin jets if the snake is sufficiently agitated or restrained. The smell has been likened to that of a billy goat, as well as to a genus of common flood-plain weeds, Pluchea, that also have a penetrating odor.[8]
Harmless watersnakes of the genus Nerodia are often mistaken for it. These are also semiaquatic, thick-bodied snakes with large heads that can be aggressive when provoked,[19] but they behave differently. For example, watersnakes usually flee quickly into the water, while A. piscivorus often stands its ground with its threat display. In addition, watersnakes do not vibrate their tails when excited.[36]A. piscivorus usually holds its head at an angle around 45° when swimming or crawling.[19]
Brown (1973) considered their heavy muscular bodies to be a striking characteristic, stating this made it difficult to hold them for venom extraction owing to their strength.[37]
This species may be active during the day and at night, but on bright, sunny days, they are usually found coiled or stretched out in the shade. In the morning and on cool days, they can often be seen basking in the sunlight. They often emerge at sunset to warm themselves on warm ground (i.e., sidewalks, roads) and then become very active throughout the night, when they are usually found swimming or crawling.[19] Contrary to popular belief, they are capable of biting while under water.[28]
In the north, they hibernate during the winter. Niell (1947, 1948) made observations in Georgia, and noted they were one of the last species to seek shelter, often being found active until the first heavy frosts. At this point, they moved to higher ground and could be found in rotting pine stumps by tearing away the bark. These snakes could be quite active upon discovery and would then attempt to burrow more deeply into the soft wood or escape to the nearest water. In southeastern Virginia, Wood (1954) reported seeing migratory behavior in late October and early November. During a period of three or four days, as many as 50 individuals could be seen swimming across Back Bay from the bayside swamps of the barrier islands to the mainland. He suggested this might have something to do with hibernating habits. In the southern parts of its range, hibernation may be short or omitted altogether.[8]
Feeding
Northern cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus) eating a rodent, Bon Secour National Wildlife Refuge, Alabama (23 October 2011)
Raymond Ditmars (1912) described A. piscivorus as carnivorous.[38] Its diet includes mammals, birds, amphibians, fish, eggs, insects,[39] other snakes, small turtles, and small alligators. Cannibalism has also been reported. Normally, though, the bulk of its diet consists of fish and frogs. On occasion, juvenile specimens feed on invertebrates.[8]Catfish (especially of the genus Ictalurus)[40] are often eaten, although the sharp spines sometimes cause injuries. Toads of the genus Bufo are apparently avoided.[19] Common prey species include southern leopard frogs, bass, juvenile black rat snakes, young common snapping turtles, and North American least shrews.[39]
Many authors have described the prey items taken under natural circumstances. Although fish and frogs are their most common prey, they eat almost any small vertebrate.[19] Fish are captured by cornering them in shallow water, usually against the bank or under logs. They take advantage when bodies of water begin to dry up in the summer or early fall and gorge themselves on the resulting high concentrations of fish and tadpoles. They are surprisingly unsuccessful at seizing either live or dead fish under water.[19]
They are opportunistic feeders and sometimes eat carrion, making them one of the few snakes to do so. Campbell and Lamar (2004) described having seen them feeding on fish heads and viscera that had been thrown into the water from a dock. Heinrich and Studenroth (1996) reported an occasion in which an individual was seen feeding on the butchered remains of a feral hog (Sus scrofa) that had been thrown into Cypress Creek.[19] Northern cottonmouths have an unusual feeding adaptation that allows them to adhere to prey through rotation of their head during swallowing because it aids the jaws in clearing the prey and contributes to the advance of the jaws along the prey.[41]
Conant (1929) gave a detailed account of the feeding behavior of a captive specimen from South Carolina. When prey was introduced, the snake quickly became attentive and made an attack. Frogs and small birds were seized and held until movement stopped. Larger prey was approached in a more cautious manner; a rapid strike was executed after which the snake would withdraw. In 2.5 years, the snake had accepted three species of frogs, including a large bullfrog, a spotted salamander, water snakes, garter snakes, sparrows, young rats, and three species of mice.[8] Brimley (1944) described a captive specimen that ate copperheads (A. contortrix), as well as members of its own species, keeping its fangs embedded in its victims until they had been immobilized.[8] A 2018 study found that northern cottonmouths on a diet of only fish when compared to a diet of mice had to eat 20% more to achieve the same growth.[42]
There have been several studies focusing on the types of prey that Cottonmouths consume, and analyzing the differences between juveniles, adult males, and adult females. It has been found that adult males and females target different prey types and sizes. Observations and stomach analyses show that adult males consume fish, whereas adult females mainly consume other squamates, in particularly snakes. In this same research, it was concluded that the prey size increased with the size of the snake for both juvenile and adults, both male and female. [43]
Young individuals have yellowish or greenish tail tips and engage in caudal luring. The tail tip is wriggled to lure prey, such as frogs and lizards, within striking distance. Wharton (1960) observed captive specimens exhibiting this behavior between 07:20 and 19:40 hours, which suggests it is a daytime activity.[19]
In August 2020 and May 2021, individuals found in Florida were observed to have consumed introduced Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus).[44] Burmese pythons are an invasive species in Florida with the capacity to inflict great damage to the local ecosystem, so it is hoped that A. piscivorus may be in the process of modifying its diet to enable it to hunt the pythons.
It is also preyed upon by ophiophagous snakes, including their own species. Humphreys (1881) described how a 34-inch (86cm) specimen was killed and eaten by a 42-inch (1.1m) captive kingsnake. On the other hand, Neill (1947) reported captive kingsnakes (Lampropeltis getula) were loath to attack them, being successfully repelled with "body blows".[8] Also called body-bridging, this is a specific defensive behavior against ophiophagous snakes, first observed in certain rattlesnake (Crotalus) species by Klauber (1927), that involves raising a section of the middle of the body above the ground to varying heights. This raised loop may then be held in this position for varying amounts of time, shifted in position, or moved towards the attacker. In the latter case, it is often flipped or thrown vigorously in the direction of the assailant. In A. piscivorus, the loop is raised laterally, with the belly facing towards the attacker.[34]
Reproduction
Newborn A. piscivorus, showing characteristic high-contrast markings and yellow tail tip
Agkistrodon piscivorus is ovoviviparous, with females usually giving birth to one to 16 live young and possibly as many as 20. Litters of six to eight are the most common. Neonates are 22–35cm (8.7–13.8in) in length (excluding runts), with the largest belonging to A. p. conanti and A. p. leucostoma the smallest. If weather conditions are favorable and food is readily available, growth is rapid and females may reproduce at less than three years of age and a total length of as little as 60cm (24in). They will also only reproduce every other year, unless optimal conditions are met for them to go through the reproduction process.[45] The young are born in August or September, while mating may occur during any of the warmer months of the year, at least in certain parts of its range.[8]
Regarding A. p. piscivorus, an early account by Stejneger (1895) described a pair in the Berlin Zoological Garden that mated on January 21, 1873, after which eight neonates were discovered in the cage on July 16 of that year. The young were each 26cm (10in) in length and 1.5cm (0.59in) thick. They shed for the first time within two weeks, after which they accepted small frogs, but not fish.[8]
The effects of central fusion and terminal fusion on heterozygosity
Combat behavior between males has been reported on a number of occasions, and is very similar in form to that seen in many other viperid species. An important factor in sexual selection, it allows for the establishment and recognition of dominance as males compete for access to sexually active females.[34]
A few accounts exist that describe females defending their newborn litters. Wharten (1960, 1966) reported several cases where females found near their young stood their ground and considered these to be examples of guarding behavior. Another case was described by Walters and Card (1996) in which a female was found at the entrance of a chamber with seven neonates crawling on or around her. When one of the young was moved a short distance from the chamber, she seemed to be agitated and faced the intruder. Eventually, all of her offspring retreated into the chamber, but the female remained at the entrance, ready to strike.[19] One study stated that females will remain with their young for one to two weeks until the young finishes their first shed cycle.[46]
Facultative parthenogenesis
Parthenogenesis is a natural form of reproduction in which growth and development of embryos occur without fertilization. A. piscivorus can reproduce by facultative parthenogenesis, that is, they are capable of switching from a sexual mode of reproduction to an asexual mode.[47] This likely involves recombination at the tips of the chromosomes, which leads to genome wide homozygosity. The result is the expression of deleterious recessive alleles and often to developmental failure (inbreeding depression). Both captive-born and wild-born A. piscivorus specimens appear to be capable of this form of parthenogenesis.[47]
Venom
Agkistrodon piscivorus venom is more toxic than that of A. contortrix, and is rich with powerful cytotoxic venom that destroys tissue. Although deaths are rare, the bite can leave scars, and on occasion, require amputation. Absent an anaphylactic reaction in a bitten individual, however, the venom does not cause systemic reactions in victims and does not contain neurotoxic components present in numerous rattlesnake species. Bites can be effectively treated with CroFabantivenom; this serum is derived using venom components from four species of American pit vipers (the eastern and western diamondback rattlesnakes, the Mojave rattlesnake, and the cottonmouth).[48]
Bites from the cottonmouth are relatively frequent in the lower Mississippi River Valley and along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, although fatalities are rare.[31] Allen and Swindell (1948) compiled a record of A. piscivorus bites in Florida from newspaper accounts and data from the Bureau of Vital Statistics: 1934, eight bites and three fatalities (no further fatalities were recorded after this year); 1935, 10; 1936, 16; 1937, 7; 1938, 6; 1939, 5; 1940, 3; 1941, 6; 1942, 3; 1943, 1; 1944, 3; 1998, 1. Wright and Wright (1957) report having encountered these snakes on countless occasions, often almost stepping on them, but never being bitten. In addition, they heard of no reports of any bites among 400 cypress cutters in the Okefenokee Swamp during the entire summer of 1921. These accounts suggest that the species is not particularly aggressive.[14] Studies show that stressed snakes are more likely to strike. This action comes as a predator defense mechanism. Snakes with elevated hormone levels are more likely to strike.[49] Additionally, larger snakes are more likely to strike than smaller snakes.
Brown (1973) gave an average venom yield (dried) of 125mg, with a range of 80–237mg, along with LD50 values of 4.0, 2.2, 2.7, 3.5, 2.0mg/kg IV, 4.8, 5.1, 4.0, 5.5, 3.8, 6.8mg/kg IP and 25.8mg/kg SC for toxicity.[37] Wolff and Githens (1939) described a 152cm (60in) specimen that yielded 3.5 ml of venom during the first extraction and 4.0 ml five weeks later (1.094 grams of dried venom).[14] The human lethal dose is unknown, but has been estimated at 100–150mg.[50]
Symptoms commonly include ecchymosis and swelling. The pain is generally more severe than bites from the copperhead, but less so than those from rattlesnakes (Crotalus spp.). The formation of vesicles and bullae is less common than with rattlesnake bites, although necrosis can occur. Myokymia is sometimes reported.[51] However, the venom has strong proteolytic activity that can lead to severe tissue destruction.[31]
Subspecies and taxonomic changes
For many decades, one species with three subspecies were formally recognized: eastern cottonmouth, A. p. piscivorus (Lacépède, 1789);[52] western cottonmouth, A. p. leucostoma (Troost, 1836);[53] and Florida cottonmouth, A. p. conantiGloyd, 1969.[54] However, a molecular (DNA) based study was published in 2014, applying phylogenetic theories (one implication being no subspecies are recognized), changing the long-standing taxonomy. The resulting and current taxonomic arrangement recognizes two species and no subspecies. The western cottonmouth (A. p. leucostoma) was synonymized with the eastern cottonmouth (A. p. piscivorus) into one species (with the oldest published name, A. p. piscivorus, having priority). The Florida cottonmouth (A. p. conanti) is now recognized as a separate species.[55]
The United States in Delmarva Peninsula, the Atlantic Coastal Plain and lower Piedmont of North and South Carolina, to eastern Georgia including outer banks and offshore islands.
The United States, in southern Georgia and Florida peninsular, including many offshore islands
Related Research Articles
The eastern copperhead, also known simply as the copperhead, is a species of venomous snake, a pit viper, endemic to eastern North America; it is a member of the subfamily Crotalinae in the family Viperidae.
Agkistrodon is a genus of venomous pit vipers commonly known as American moccasins. The genus is endemic to North America, ranging from the Southern United States to northern Costa Rica. Eight species are currently recognized, all of them monotypic and closely related. Common names include: cottonmouths, copperheads, and cantils.
Sistrurus is a genus of venomous pit vipers in the subfamily Crotalinae of the family Viperidae. The genus is endemic to Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Its generic name is a Latinized form of the Greek word for "tail rattler" and shares its root with the ancient Egyptian musical instrument, the sistrum, a type of rattle. Three species are currently recognized.
The eastern diamondback rattlesnake is a species of pit viper in the family Viperidae. The species is endemic to the Southeastern United States. It is one of the heaviest venomous snakes in the Americas and the largest rattlesnake. No subspecies are recognized.
The black-tailed rattlesnake is a venomous pit viper species found in the southwestern United States and Mexico. Four subspecies are currently recognized, including the nominate subspecies described here.
The western cottonmouth was once classified as a subspecies of the cottonmouth. However, DNA based studies published in 2008 and 2015, revealed no significant genetic difference between the eastern cottonmouth and the western cottonmouth and synonymized the two subspecies. The resulting taxonomy does not recognizes the western cottonmouth as a valid taxon. Several subsequent reviews and species accounts have followed and supported the revised taxonomy. Information on this snake can be found in the Agkistrodon piscivorus article.
Agkistrodon taylori is a species of venomous snake, a pitviper (Crotalinae) found only in northeastern Mexico. The standardized names are Taylor's cantil (English) and Metapil (Spanish), although it is sometimes called the ornate cantil as well as several other colloquial names. It was named in honor of American herpetologist Edward Harrison Taylor.
Gloydius blomhoffii, commonly known as the mamushi, Japanese moccasin, Japanese pit viper, Qichun snake, Salmusa or Japanese mamushi, is a venomous pit viper species found in Japan. It was once considered to have 4 subspecies, but it is now considered monotypic.
Nerodia rhombifer, commonly known as the diamondback water snake, is a species of nonvenomous natricine colubrid endemic to the central United States and northern Mexico. There are three recognized subspecies of N. rhombifer, including the nominotypical subspecies.
Roger Conant was an American herpetologist, author, educator and conservationist. He was Director Emeritus of the Philadelphia Zoo and adjunct professor at the University of New Mexico. He wrote one of the first comprehensive field guides for North American reptiles in 1958 entitled: A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America, in the Peterson Field Guide series.
Agkistrodon bilineatus is a highly venomous pit viper species found in Mexico and Central America as far south as Honduras.
Sistrurus miliarius, commonly called the pygmy rattlesnake, is a species of venomous snake in the subfamily Crotalinae of the family Viperidae. The species is endemic to the Southeastern United States. Three subspecies are currently recognized.
The Florida cottonmouth is a species of venomous snake, a pit viper in the subfamily Crotalinae of the family Viperidae. The species is endemic to the United States, where it occurs in southern Georgia and the Florida peninsula in nearly every type of wetlands in the region, including brackish water and offshore islands. However, it is not entirely dependent on water and is occasionally encountered as far as a mile from surface water. Agkistrodon conanti venom is very hemolytic and known to cause relatively extensive necrosis compared to many snake venoms, and can sometimes be lethal with a 17% mortality rate. It is often confused with harmless watersnakes (Nerodia) and other semi-aquatic species with which it shares its habitat.
Agkistrodon contortrix pictigaster was formerly a venomous pit viper subspecies found in the Trans-Pecos region of the United States in western Texas, and northeastern Mexico. However, recent taxonomic changes do not recognize the Trans-Pecos copperhead as a valid taxon.
Agkistrodon laticinctus, commonly known as the broad-banded copperhead, is a venomous pit viper species, formerly considered a subspecies of Agkistrodon contortrix, which is found in the southern United States, from Kansas, through Oklahoma and throughout central Texas.
Howard Kay Gloyd was an American herpetologist who is credited with describing several new species and subspecies of reptiles, such as the Florida cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus conanti.
Sistrurus miliarius barbouri is a venomous pit viper subspecies endemic to the southeastern United States.
Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus was formerly a venomous pitviper, one of three subspecies of Agkistrodon piscivorus, with different geographic distributions, found in the southeastern United States. However, recent taxonomic changes do not recognizes any subspecies of cottonmouth as a valid taxa.
Agkistrodon contortrix mokasen was formerly a venomous pit viper subspecies found in the eastern United States. However, recent taxonomic changes do not recognize the northern copperhead as a valid taxon.
Agkistrodon howardgloydi is a species of venomous snake, a pit viper in the subfamily Crotalinae of the family Viperidae. The species is endemic to Central America. It is most commonly called castellana, but it has also been called the southern cantil, Gloyd's moccasin, and a number of other colloquial names. It is a rare species with a relatively small geographic distribution in the tropical dry forest on the Pacific coast of Honduras, Nicaragua, and extreme northwest Costa Rica. A. howardgloydi is a stout, medium-sized snake with a maximum total length of 96 cm (38 in). It is a viviparous species, with females giving birth in the rainy season from May to August. No clinical reports on envenomation had been published, but laboratory texts and analysis indicate the venom is highly toxic and similar to its close relative Agkistrodon bilineatus, and potentially lethal.
↑ Kardong, Kenneth Victor (1982). "Comparative study of changes in prey capture behavior of the cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus) and Egyptian cobra (Naja haje)". Copeia1982: 337-343.
↑ Vincent, Shawn E.; Herrel, Anthony; Irschick, Duncan J. (2004). "Sexual dimorphism in head shape and diet in the cottonmouth snake (Agkistrodon piscivorus)". Journal of Zoology264 (1): 53-59.
↑ Rainwater, Thomas R.; Reynolds, Kevin D.; Cañas, Jaclyn E.; Cobb, George P.; Anderson, Todd A.; McMurry, Scott T.; Smith, Philip N. (2005). "Organochlorine pesticides and mercury in cottonmouths (Agkistrodon piscivorus) from northeastern Texas, USA". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry24 (3): 665-673.
↑ Roark, Andrew W. (2003). Comparative genetic analysis in insular and mainland populations of the Florida cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus conanti. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).
1 2 3 U.S. Navy (1991). Poisonous Snakes of the World. New York: United States Government / Dover Publications, Inc. 203 pp. ISBN0-486-26629-X.
↑ Behler JL, King FW (1979). The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Reptiles and Amphibians. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 743 pp. 657 plates. LCCCN 79-2217. ISBN0-394-50824-6. (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp. 684-685 + Plates 654, 656, 657).
1 2 3 4 Carpenter, Charles C.; Gillingham, James C. (1990). "Ritualized Behavior in Agkistrodon and Allied Genera". pp. 523–531. In: Gloyd HK, Conant R (1990). Snakes of the Agkistrodon Complex: A Monographic Review. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. 614 pp. 52 plates. LCCN 89-50342. ISBN0-916984-20-6.
↑ Conant R, Bridges W (1942). What Snake Is That? A Field Guide to the Snakes of the United States East of the Rocky Mountains. (With 108 drawings by Edmond Malnate). New York and London: D. Appleton-Century Company. Frontispiece map + viii + 163 pp. + Plates A–C, 1–32. (Agkistrodon piscivorus pp. 140–141 + Plate 28, Figure 82).
↑ Conant R (1975). A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America, Second Edition. First published in 1958. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. xviii + 429 pp. + 48 plates. ISBN0-395-19979-4 (hardcover), ISBN0-395-19977-8 (paperback). (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp. 228–230 + Plate 34 + Map 173).
1 2 Brown, John Haynes (1973). Toxicology and Pharmacology of Venoms from Poisonous Snakes. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas. 184 pp. LCCCN 73-229. ISBN0-398-02808-7.
↑ Kardong, Kenneth (1977). "Kinesis of the Jaw Apparatus during Swallowing in the Cottonmouth Snake, Agkistrodon Piscivorus". Copeia. 2 (2): 338–348. doi:10.2307/1443913. JSTOR1443913.
↑ Weidler JM (2018). "An Experimental Manipulation of Diet and its Influence on Growth and Epidermal Lipids in the Northern Cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus)". ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
↑ Graham, Sean P.; Earley, Ryan L.; Hoss, Shannon K.; Schuett, Gordon W.; Grober, Matthew S. (November 2008). "The reproductive biology of male cottonmouths (Agkistrodon piscivorus): Do plasma steroid hormones predict the mating season?". General and Comparative Endocrinology. 159 (2–3): 226–235. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.09.002. ISSN0016-6480. PMID18823979.
↑ Norris R (2004). "Venom Poisoning in North American Reptiles". In: Campbell JA, Lamar WW (2004). The Venomous Reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. Ithaca and London: Comstock Publishing Associates. 870 pp. 1,500 plates. ISBN0-8014-4141-2.
1 2 Lacepède BGE (1789). Histoire Naturelle des Quadrupèdes Ovipares et de Serpens. Vol.2. Paris: lmprimerie du Roi. 671 pp.
↑ Troost, Gerardus (1836). "On a new genus of serpents, and two new species of the genus Heterodon, inhabiting Tennessee". Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York3: 174–190.
1 2 Gloyd, Howard K. (1969). "Two additional subspecies of North American crotalid snakes, genus Agkistrodon ". Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington82: 219–232.
1 2 3 4 5 Crother, Brian I. (editor) (2017). Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding. SSAR (Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles) Herpetological Circular 43. 102 pp. (p. 59)
Further reading
Allen ER, Swindell D (1948). "The cottonmouth moccasin of Florida". Herpetologica4 (supplement 1): 1–16.
Baird SF, Girard C (1853). Catalogue of North American Reptiles in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Part I.—Serpentes. Washington, District of Columbia: Smithsonian Institution. xvi + 172 pp. (for a discussion of the publication date, see Adler K. 1963. J. Ohio Herpetol. Soc.4: 55–57).
Bonnaterre P-J (1790). Ophiologie. pp.1–76. In Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois règnes de la nature [Encyclopédie Methodique]. Paris, France: Chez Panckoucke, Libraire. i–xliv + 1–76. (in French).
Boulenger GA (1896). Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). Volume III., Containing the Colubridæ (Opisthoglyphæ and Proteroglyphæ), Amblycephalidæ, and Viperidæ. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). (Taylor and Francis, printers). xiv + 727 pp. (Ancistrodon piscivorus, pp.520–521).
Brimley CS (1944). Amphibians and Reptiles of North Carolina. Elon College, North Carolina, Carolina Biol. Supply Co., reprinted from Carolina Tips, 1939–43: 1–63.
Catesby M (1743). The natural history of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands: Containing the figures of birds, beasts, fishes, serpents, insects, and plants: Particularly the forest-trees, shrubs, and other plants, not hitherto described, or very incorrectly figured by authors. Together with their descriptions in English and French. To which are added, observation on the air, soil, and waters; With remarks upon agriculture, grain, pulse, roots, &c, To the whole is prefixed a new and correct map of the countries treated of. London, Printed at the expense of the author, 1731–1743: 2 vols. Vol.II: 100 + 200 (appendix).
Conant R (1929). "Notes on a water moccasin in captivity (Agkistrodon piscivorus) (female)". Bull. Antivenin Inst. Amer.3: 61–64.
Cope ED (1860) (dated 1859). "Catalogue of the venomous serpents in the museum of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, with notes on the families, genera and species". Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia11: 332–347.
Cope ED (1875). Check-list of North American Batrachia and Reptiles with a systematic list of higher groups, and an essay on geographical distribution based on specimens contained in the United States National Museum. Washington, District of Columbia: Government Printing Office. 104 pp.
Cuvier G (1829). Le règne animal distribué d'après son organisation, pour servir de base à l'histoire naturelle des animaux det d'introduction à l'anatomie comparée. Tome II, contenant les reptiles, les poissons, les mollusques et les annélidés. Nouvelle édition. Paris: Déterville. xv + 406 pp. (in French).
Daudin FM (1801–1803). Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des reptiles: ouvrage faisant suit à l'histoire naturelle générale et particulière, composée par Leclerc de Buffon; et rédigée par C.S. Sonnini, miembre de plusieurs sociétés savantes. 8 vols. Paris: F. Dufart. (in French). (for a discussion of the publication date, see F. Harper. 1940. Amer. Midl. Nat.23: 693).
Ditmars RL (1912). "The feeding habits of serpents". Zoologica1: 197–238.
Duméril A-M-C, Bibron G, Duméril A-H-A (1854). Erpetologie générale ou histoire naturelle complète des reptiles. Vol. 7. (Parts 1 and 2). Paris: Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret. 1,536 pp. (in French).
Dunson, William A.; Freda, Joseph (1985). "Water permeability of the skin of the amphibious snake, Agkistrodon piscivorus ". J. Herpetol.19 (1): 93–98.
Garman S (1884) (dated 1883). "The reptiles and batrachians of North America". Memoires of the Museum of Comparative Zoology8 (3): 1–185.
Garman S (1890). "Notes on Illinois reptiles and amphibians, including several specimens not before recorded from the northern states". Bulletin of the Illinois Natural History Survey3: 185–190.
Gloyd HK, Conant R (1943). "A synopsis of the American forms of Agkistrodon (copperheads and moccasins)". Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci.7: 147–170.
Goin CJ, Goin OB, Zug GR (1978). Introduction to Herpetology, Third Edition. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company. xi + 378 pp. ISBN0-7167-0020-4. (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp.113, 124, 336).
Gray JE (1842). "Synopsis of the species of rattle-snakes, or family of Crotalidae". Zoological Miscellany, London2: 47–51 (reprinted in 1971 by the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles).
Harlan R (1835). Medical and physical research of original memories in medicine, surgery, physiology, geology, zoology and comparative anatomy. Philadelphia. xxxix + 635 pp.
Heinrich, George; Studenroth, Karl R. Jr. (1996). "Natural history notes: Agkistrodon piscivorus conanti (Florida cottonmouth). Diet". Herpetol. Rev.27 (1): 22.
Higgins, Silvestre B. (1873). Ophidians, zoological arrangement of the different genera, including varieties known in North and South America, the East Indies, South Africa, and Australia. The poisons, and all that is known of their nature. The galls as antidotes to the snake venom. Pathological, toxicological, and microscopical facts; together with much interesting matter hitherto not published. New York: Boericke & Tafel. 239 pp.
Holbrook JE (1838). North American Herpetology; Or, a Description of the Reptiles Inhabiting the United States. Volume 2. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: J. Dobson: i–iv + 5–125.
Hubbs B, O'Connor B (2012). A Guide to the Rattlesnakes and other Venomous Serpents of the United States. Tempe, Arizona: Tricolor Books. 129 pp. ISBN978-0-9754641-3-7. (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp.104–109, 125–126).
Humphreys, John T. (1881). "The king snake (Ophibolus sayi) sups on a full grown water moccasin (Ancistrodon piscivorus)". Amer. Nat.15: 561–562.
Jan G (1863). Elenco sistematico degli ofidi descritti e disegnati per l'iconografia generale. Milan, Italy: A. Lombardi. vii + 143 pp. (in Italian).
Klauber LM (1927). "Some observations on the rattlesnakes of the extreme southwest". Bull. Antivenin Inst. Amer.1 (1): 7–21.
Lacépède BGE (1789). Histoire naturelle des quadrupèdes ovipares et des serpentes, vol. 2 Table Méthodique. Paris, France: Hotel de Thou. 527 pp. (in French).
Merrem B (1820). Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien. Tentamen systematis amphibiorum. Marburg: J.C. Krieger. xv + 191 pp. + 1 plate. (in German and Latin).
Morris PA (1948). Boy's Book of Snakes: How to Recognize and Understand Them. (A volume of the Humanizing Science Series, edited by Jaques Cattell). New York: Ronald Press. viii + 185 pp. (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp.114–117, 180).
Niell WT Jr (1947). "Size and habits of the cottonmouth moccasin". Herpetologica3: 203–205.
Niell WT Jr (1948). "Hibernation of amphibians and reptiles in Richmond County, Georgia". Herpetologica4: 107–114.
Powell R, Conant R, Collins JT (2016). Peterson Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America, Fourth Edition. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. xiv + 494 pp.47 Plates, 207 Figures. ISBN978-0-544-12997-9. (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp.437–438, Figure 198 + Plate 45).
Schmidt KP (1953). A check list of North American amphibians and reptiles. Sixth edition. Chicago, Illinois: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. i–viii + 280 pp.
Schmidt KP, Davis DD (1941). Field Book of Snakes of the United States and Canada. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons. 365 pp.103 Figures. 34 plates. (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp.285–287, Figure 94 + Plate 30, Below).
Shaw G (1802). General Zoology or Systematic Natural History. Vol. 3. Part 2. Amphibia. London: Thomas Davidson. vi + 313–615.
Smith HM, Brodie ED Jr (1982). Reptiles of North America: A Guide to Field Identification. New York: Golden Press. 240 pp. ISBN0-307-13666-3 (paperback), ISBN0-307-47009-1 (hardcover). (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp.200–201).
Sonnini CS, Latreille PA (1801). Histoire naturelle des reptiles, avec figures dissinées dápres nature. 4 Vols. Paris. (in French). (for a discussion of the publication date, see Harper, F. 1940. Amer. Midl. Nat.23: 692–723).
Stejneger L (1895). "The poisonous snakes of North America". Ann. Rept. U.S. Natl. Mus.1893: 337–487.
Stejneger L, Barbour T (1917). A Check List of North American Amphibians and Reptiles. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 125 pp. (Agkistrodon piscivorus, p.107).
Stewart GD (1974). "Diagnosis of two new American snakes". Baltimore Univ. Comm. (529 N. Howard St. / "an unincorp. free lance organization") 2: 1 [1].
Walters, Adam C.; Card, Winston (1996). "Natural history notes: Agkistrodon piscivorus conanti (Florida cottonmouth). Prey". Herpetol. Rev.27 (4): 203.
Wharton, Charles H. (1960). "Birth and behavior of a brood of cottonmouths, Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus, with notes on tail-luring". Herpetologica16 (2): 125–129.
Wharton CH (1966). "Reproduction and growth in the cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus Lacépède, of Cedar Keys, Florida". Copeia1966 (2): 149–161.
Wolff, Nigel O'Connor; Githens, Thomas S. (1939). "Record venom extraction from water moccasin". Copeia1939 (1): 52.
Wood, John Thornton (1954). "The distribution of poisonous snakes in Virginia". Virginia Journal of Science5: 152–167.
Yarrow HC (1882). "Check list of North American Reptilia and Batrachia, with catalogue of specimens in the United States Museum". Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum24: 1–249.
Zim HS, Smith HM (1956). Reptiles and Amphibians: A Guide to Familiar American Species: A Golden Nature Guide. Revised Edition. New York: Simon and Schuster. 160 pp. (Agkistrodon piscivorus, pp.109, 156).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
