Chartjunk

Last updated
An example of a chart containing gratuitous chartjunk. This chart uses a large area and much "ink" (many symbols and lines) to show only five hard-to-read numbers, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. Chartjunk-example.svg
An example of a chart containing gratuitous chartjunk. This chart uses a large area and much "ink" (many symbols and lines) to show only five hard-to-read numbers, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16.

Chartjunk consists of all visual elements in charts and graphs that are not necessary to comprehend the information represented on the graph, or that distract the viewer from this information. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Markings and visual elements can be called chartjunk if they are not part of the minimum set of visuals necessary to communicate the information understandably. Examples of unnecessary elements that might be called chartjunk include heavy or dark grid lines, unnecessary text, inappropriately complex or gimmicky font faces, ornamented chart axes, and display frames, pictures, backgrounds or icons within data graphs, ornamental shading and unnecessary dimensions.

Another kind of chartjunk skews the depiction and makes it difficult to understand the real data being displayed. Examples of this type include items depicted out of scale to one another, noisy backgrounds making comparison between elements difficult in a chart or graph, and 3-D simulations in line and bar charts.

A map with chartjunk: the gradients inside each province Macedonian statistical regions - it.png
A map with chartjunk: the gradients inside each province

The term chartjunk was coined by Edward Tufte in his 1983 book The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. [1] Tufte wrote:

The interior decoration of graphics generates a lot of ink that does not tell the viewer anything new. The purpose of decoration variesto make the graphic appear more scientific and precise, to enliven the display, to give the designer an opportunity to exercise artistic skills. Regardless of its cause, it is all non-data-ink or redundant data-ink, and it is often chartjunk.

The term is relatively recent and is often associated with Tufte in other references. [2] [4]

The concept is analogous to Adolf Loos's idea that ornament is a crime.[ improper synthesis? ]

Etymology

The term chartjunk was first coined by Edward Tufte in 1983. [1] The book was developed based on ideas and materials developed for a Princeton statistics course that Tufte co-taught with John Tukey. As a self-published book, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Tufte claims that good design is founded in minimalist design principles. Specifically, he states that "graphics reveal data" [1] if they are designed with "graphical integrity." [1] Tufte, through minimalist design principles, was committed to an objective and neutral values of science. Other researchers have argued that minimalism is not objective and is full of its own rhetoric and potential to bias. [5] [6]

Tufte, in coining the term chartjunk, also made direct comments about a well-known designer at that time, Nigel Holmes.

Nearly all those who produce graphics for mass publication are trained exclusively in the fine arts and have had little experience with the analysis of data. Such experiences are essential for achieving precision and grace in the presence of statistics... Those who get ahead are those who beautified data, never mind statistical integrity." [1]

Further, in his second published book, Envisioning Information, [7] Tufte critiques Holmes' Diamonds chart: [8]

"Consider this unsavory exhibit at right – chockablock with cliché and stereotype, coarse humor, and a content-empty third dimension... Credibility vanishes in clouds of chartjunk; who would trust a chart that looks like a video game?"

In a 1992 New York Times article, the reporter captures Holmes' response to Tufte's criticism: [9]

"Time's Nigel Holmes, creator of the diamonds graph, was understandably irked when Tufte criticized it. Holmes admits his work has sometimes been exaggerated, but feels that Tufte, in his insistence on absolute mathematical fidelity, remains trapped in ’the world of academia’ and insensitive to ’the world of commerce,’ with its need to grab an audience"

This debate between Tufte and Holmes is emblematic of the tension between statistical and designerly approaches to visualization design. [5] [10] [11]

Debate over meaning

The term chartjunk is an umbrella term that can be used to describe a variety of visual devices and has been referenced by different terms across research.

Chartjunk Alternative Terms
TermCitation
embellishment [5] [12]
excessive annotation [13]
decoration [13]
extraneous elements [6]
unnecessary ornamentation [6]

Stephen Few, a data visualization practitioner and consultant at Perceptual Edge, stated that Tufte's original definition of chartjunk was "too loose" and that "by defining chartjunk too broadly, Tufte to some degree invited the heated controversy that has raged ever since." [10]

Robert Kosara, also a data visualization practitioner, researcher, and author of the blog EagerEyes, noted that not all chartjunk are the same, some are harmful (e.g. a busy background), others harmless (e.g. nice borders or pictures), and some even helpful (e.g. annotations). [14]

In a recent study by Parsons and Shukla, [11] they interviewed data visualization designers and found that there is both a "corrective movement" in the design community to move away from minimalist design principles, but also, that designers had different definitions for what constitutes chartjunk. The authors felt that "better definitions are needed so that everyone has a shared understanding [about chartjunk]."

Chartjunk in research

The information visualization research community has researched the effects of chartjunk on how viewers interpret visualizations. There have been studies that found that chartjunk increases long-term memorability of the chart. [5] [13] A recent study [12] found that chartjunk, in the form of semantically meaningful icons, increased accessibility of charts for people with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD).

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chart</span> Graphical representation of data

A chart is a graphical representation for data visualization, in which "the data is represented by symbols, such as bars in a bar chart, lines in a line chart, or slices in a pie chart". A chart can represent tabular numeric data, functions or some kinds of quality structure and provides different info.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Information design</span> Communication and graphic design

Information design is the practice of presenting information in a way that fosters an efficient and effective understanding of the information. The term has come to be used for a specific area of graphic design related to displaying information effectively, rather than just attractively or for artistic expression. Information design is closely related to the field of data visualization and is often taught as part of graphic design courses. The broad applications of information design along with its close connections to other fields of design and communication practices have created some overlap in the definitions of communication design, data visualization, and information architecture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward Tufte</span> American statistician (b.1942) noted for his writings on information design

Edward Rolf Tufte, sometimes known as "ET", is an American statistician and professor emeritus of political science, statistics, and computer science at Yale University. He is noted for his writings on information design and as a pioneer in the field of data visualization.

A small multiple is a series of similar graphs or charts using the same scale and axes, allowing them to be easily compared. It uses multiple views to show different partitions of a dataset. The term was popularized by Edward Tufte.

A diagram is a symbolic representation of information using visualization techniques. Diagrams have been used since prehistoric times on walls of caves, but became more prevalent during the Enlightenment. Sometimes, the technique uses a three-dimensional visualization which is then projected onto a two-dimensional surface. The word graph is sometimes used as a synonym for diagram.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visualization (graphics)</span> Set of techniques for creating images, diagrams, or animations to communicate a message

Visualization or visualisation is any technique for creating images, diagrams, or animations to communicate a message. Visualization through visual imagery has been an effective way to communicate both abstract and concrete ideas since the dawn of humanity. from history include cave paintings, Egyptian hieroglyphs, Greek geometry, and Leonardo da Vinci's revolutionary methods of technical drawing for engineering and scientific purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pie chart</span> Circular statistical graph that illustrates numerical proportion

A pie chart is a circular statistical graphic which is divided into slices to illustrate numerical proportion. In a pie chart, the arc length of each slice is proportional to the quantity it represents. While it is named for its resemblance to a pie which has been sliced, there are variations on the way it can be presented. The earliest known pie chart is generally credited to William Playfair's Statistical Breviary of 1801.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infographic</span> Graphic visual representation of information

Infographics are graphic visual representations of information, data, or knowledge intended to present information quickly and clearly. They can improve cognition by utilizing graphics to enhance the human visual system's ability to see patterns and trends. Similar pursuits are information visualization, data visualization, statistical graphics, information design, or information architecture. Infographics have evolved in recent years to be for mass communication, and thus are designed with fewer assumptions about the readers' knowledge base than other types of visualizations. Isotypes are an early example of infographics conveying information quickly and easily to the masses.

A sparkline is a very small line chart, typically drawn without axes or coordinates. It presents the general shape of a variation in some measurement, such as temperature or stock market price, in a simple and highly condensed way. Whereas a typical chart is designed to professionally show as much data as possible, and is set off from the flow of text, sparklines are intended to be succinct, memorable, and located where they are discussed. Sparklines are small enough to be embedded in text, or several sparklines may be grouped together as elements of a small multiple.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Data and information visualization</span> Visual representation of data

Data and information visualization is the practice of designing and creating easy-to-communicate and easy-to-understand graphic or visual representations of a large amount of complex quantitative and qualitative data and information with the help of static, dynamic or interactive visual items. Typically based on data and information collected from a certain domain of expertise, these visualizations are intended for a broader audience to help them visually explore and discover, quickly understand, interpret and gain important insights into otherwise difficult-to-identify structures, relationships, correlations, local and global patterns, trends, variations, constancy, clusters, outliers and unusual groupings within data. When intended for the general public to convey a concise version of known, specific information in a clear and engaging manner, it is typically called information graphics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Joseph Minard</span> French civil engineer (1781–1870)

Charles Joseph Minard was a French civil engineer recognized for his significant contribution in the field of information graphics in civil engineering and statistics. Minard was, among other things, noted for his representation of numerical data on geographic maps, especially his flow maps.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernoff face</span> Human-face shaped display of data

Chernoff faces, invented by applied mathematician, statistician and physicist Herman Chernoff in 1973, display multivariate data in the shape of a human face. The individual parts, such as eyes, ears, mouth and nose represent values of the variables by their shape, size, placement and orientation. The idea behind using faces is that humans easily recognize faces and notice small changes without difficulty. Chernoff faces handle each variable differently. Because the features of the faces vary in perceived importance, the way in which variables are mapped to the features should be carefully chosen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diagrammatic reasoning</span>

Diagrammatic reasoning is reasoning by means of visual representations. The study of diagrammatic reasoning is about the understanding of concepts and ideas, visualized with the use of diagrams and imagery instead of by linguistic or algebraic means.

Statistical graphics, also known as statistical graphical techniques, are graphics used in the field of statistics for data visualization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bubble chart</span> Type of chart

A bubble chart is a type of chart that displays three dimensions of data. Each entity with its triplet (v1, v2, v3) of associated data is plotted as a disk that expresses two of the vi values through the disk's xy location and the third through its size. Bubble charts can facilitate the understanding of social, economical, medical, and other scientific relationships.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motion chart</span>

A motion chart is a dynamic bubble chart which allows efficient and interactive exploration and visualization of longitudinal multivariate Data. Motion charts provide mechanisms for mapping ordinal, nominal and quantitative variables onto time, 2D coordinate axes, size, colors, glyphs and appearance characteristics, which facilitate the interactive display of multidimensional and temporal data.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Misleading graph</span> Graph that misrepresents data

In statistics, a misleading graph, also known as a distorted graph, is a graph that misrepresents data, constituting a misuse of statistics and with the result that an incorrect conclusion may be derived from it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Howard G. Funkhouser</span> American mathematician and historian (1898–1984)

Howard Gray Funkhouser was an American mathematician, historian and associate professor of mathematics at the Washington and Lee University, and later at the Phillips Exeter Academy, particularly known for his early work on the history of graphical methods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Graphical perception</span>

Graphical perception is the human capacity for visually interpreting information on graphs and charts. Both quantitative and qualitative information can be said to be encoded into the image, and the human capacity to interpret it is sometimes called decoding. The importance of human graphical perception, what we discern easily versus what our brains have more difficulty decoding, is fundamental to good statistical graphics design, where clarity, transparency, accuracy and precision in data display and interpretation are essential for understanding the translation of data in a graph to clarify and interpret the science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horizon chart</span>

A horizon chart or horizon graph is a 2-dimensional data visualisation displaying a quantitative data over a continuous interval, most commonly a time period. The horizon chart is valuable for enabling readers to identify trends and extreme values within large datasets. Similar to sparklines and ridgeline plot, horizon chart may not be the most suitable visualisation for precisely pinpointing specific values. Instead, its strength lies in providing an overview and highlighting patterns and outliers in the data.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tufte, Edward R. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information . Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
  2. 1 2 Harris, Robert L. (1999). Information Graphics: A Comprehensive Illustrated Reference. USA: Oxford University Press. p. 72. ISBN   0-19-513532-6.
  3. Tufte, Edward R. (2006). Beautiful Evidence . Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. pp.  152–53. ISBN   978-0961392178.
  4. Cleveland, William S. (1985). The Elements of Graphing Data . Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth & Advanced Book Program. p.  25. ISBN   0-534-03730-5.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Bateman, Scott; Mandryk, Regan L.; Gutwin, Carl; Genest, Aaron; McDine, David; Brooks, Christopher (2010). "Useful junk?". Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: ACM Press. pp. 2573–2582. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753716. ISBN   978-1-60558-929-9. S2CID   195346232.
  6. 1 2 3 Kennedy, Helen; Hill, Rosemary Lucy; Aiello, Giorgia; Allen, William (2016-03-16). "The work that visualisation conventions do". Information, Communication & Society. 19 (6): 715–735. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1153126. ISSN   1369-118X. S2CID   61550176.
  7. Tufte, Edward R. (1990). Envisioning information. Graphics Press. ISBN   978-1-930824-14-0. OCLC   1135806416.
  8. Bailey, Jefferson; Pregill, Lily (September 2014). "Speak to the Eyes: The History and Practice of Information Visualization". Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America. 33 (2): 168–191. doi:10.1086/678525. ISSN   0730-7187. S2CID   62223240.
  9. Patton, Phil (1992-01-19). "UP FROM FLATLAND". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2021-08-01.
  10. 1 2 Few, Stephen. "The Chartjunk Debate: A Close Examination of Recent Findings" (PDF). Perceptual Edge. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-05-21. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  11. 1 2 Parsons, Paul; Shukla, Prakash (October 2020). "Data Visualization Practitioners' Perspectives on Chartjunk". 2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). Salt Lake City, UT, USA: IEEE. pp. 211–215. arXiv: 2009.02634 . doi:10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00049. ISBN   978-1-7281-8014-4. S2CID   221516843.
  12. 1 2 Wu, Keke; Petersen, Emma; Ahmad, Tahmina; Burlinson, David; Tanis, Shea; Szafir, Danielle Albers (2021-05-06). "Understanding Data Accessibility for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities". Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 1–16. doi:10.1145/3411764.3445743. ISBN   978-1-4503-8096-6. S2CID   233987580.
  13. 1 2 3 Borkin, Michelle A.; Vo, Azalea A.; Bylinskii, Zoya; Isola, Phillip; Sunkavalli, Shashank; Oliva, Aude; Pfister, Hanspeter (December 2013). "What Makes a Visualization Memorable?". IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 19 (12): 2306–2315. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.234. ISSN   1077-2626. PMID   24051797. S2CID   2936091.
  14. "The Three Types of Chart Junk". eagereyes. 2012-03-05. Retrieved 2021-08-01.