Eastern Sudanic languages

Last updated
Eastern Sudanic
(disputed)
Geographic
distribution
Egypt, Sudan, South Sudan, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Chad, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda
Linguistic classification Nilo-Saharan?
  • Eastern Sudanic
Subdivisions
Language codes
ISO 639-5 sdv
ISO 639-3
Glottolog None

In most classifications, the Eastern Sudanic languages are a group of nine families of languages that may constitute a branch of the Nilo-Saharan language family. Eastern Sudanic languages are spoken from southern Egypt to northern Tanzania.

Contents

Nubian (and possibly Meroitic) gives Eastern Sudanic some of the earliest written attestations of African languages. However, the largest branch by far is Nilotic, spread by extensive and comparatively recent conquests throughout East Africa. Before the spread of Nilotic, Eastern Sudanic was centered in present-day Sudan. The name "East Sudanic" refers to the eastern part of the region of Sudan where the country of Sudan is located, and contrasts with Central Sudanic and Western Sudanic (modern Mande, in the Niger–Congo family).

Lionel Bender (1980) proposes several Eastern Sudanic isoglosses (defining words), such as *kutuk "mouth", *(ko)TVS-(Vg) "three", and *ku-lug-ut or *kVl(t) "fish".

In older classifications, such as that of Meinhof (1911), the term was used for the eastern Sudanic languages, largely equivalent to modern Nilo-Saharan sans Nilotic, which is the largest constituent of modern Eastern Sudanic.

Güldemann (2018, 2022) considers East Sudanic to be undemonstrated at the current state of research. He only accepts the evidence for a connection between the Nilotic and Surmic languages as "robust", and states that Rilly's evidence (see below) for the northern group comprising Nubian, Nara, Nyima, Taman and Meroitic "certainly look[s] promising". [1] He finds the Southern East Sudanic unit (comprising Nilotic, Surmic, Jebel, Temein and Daju) typologically coherent and, with the exclusion of Daju, showing likely correspondences among personal pronouns. [2] Glottolog (2023) does not accept even a Surmic–Nilotic relationship.

Typology

The putative Eastern Sudanic languages are "surprisingly diverse" and resemble in this the larger Nilo-Saharan proposal. [3] No common typological features unify them. A set of head-initial languages corresponds largely with the Southern group (typologically similar to also e.g. the Kadu and Central Sudanic families), and a set of head-final languages corresponds largely with the Northern group (typologically similar to also e.g. the Maban and Saharan families). Typological difference, however, does not preclude a relationship, and typological similarities with nearby certainly or likely unrelated languages suggests that these similarities might be partly areal. Omotic and Cushitic, in particular, are nearby head-final families belonging instead in the large Afro-Asiatic phylum and forming the Ethiopian language area.

Internal classification

There are several different classifications of East Sudanic languages.

Bender (2000)

Lionel Bender assigns the languages into two branches, depending on whether the 1sg pronoun ("I") has a /k/ or an /n/:

Eastern
Sudanic
Northern  (k languages)
Southern  (n languages)

Rilly (2009)

Claude Rilly (2009:2) [4] provides the following internal structure for the Eastern Sudanic languages.

Starostin (2015)

Starostin, using lexicostatistics, finds strong support for Bender's Northern branch, but none for the Southern branch. [5] Eastern Sudanic as a whole is rated a probable working model, pending proper comparative work, while the relationship between Nubian, Tama, and Nara is beyond reasonable doubt.

Eastern
Sudanic

Nyima is not part of the northern group, though it appears to be closest to it. (For one thing, its pronouns align well with the northern (Astaboran) branches.) Surmic, Nilotic, and Temein share a number of similarities, including in their pronouns, but not enough to warrant classifying them together in opposition to Astaboran without proper comparative work. Jebel and Daju also share many similarities with Surma and Nilotic, though their pronominal systems are closer to Astaboran.

Inclusion of Kuliak and Berta is not supported. Similarities with Kuliak may be due to both being Nilo-Saharan families, whereas Berta and Jebel form a sprachbund.

A similar classification was given in Starostin (2014): [6]

  • Eastern Sudanic
    • Tama-Nara-Nubian branch
    • Surmic branch
      • Northern Surmic (= Majang)
      • Southern Surmic
        • Southwest Surmic
        • Southeast Surmic
    • Nilotic branch
      • Northern Nilotic
        • Western Nilotic
        • Eastern Nilotic
      • Southern Nilotic
    • Daju
    • Nyimang
    • Temein
    • Jebel

Blench (2019, 2021)

Roger Blench (2019) [7] :18 and (2021), [8] like Starostin, only finds support for Bender's Northern branch. Blench proposes the following internal structure, supported by morphological evidence.

Dimmendaal & Jakobi (< 2020)

Dimmendaal & Jakobi (2020:394), [9] published in 2020 but written some times earlier, retains Bender's Southern branch; they also accept Berta:

Numerals

Comparison of numerals in individual languages (excluding Nilotic and Surmic languages): [10]

ClassificationLanguage12345678910
Nara Nara (Nera) dōkkūūàriɡáàsāānáʃōōnáwiitadáátàjāāriɡáà (5+ 2)  ?dèssèná (5+ 3) ?lùfūttá-màdāā (10–1)  ?lùfūk
Nubian, Western Midob Nubian pàrciə̀ddítáasíèejítéccíkórcíòlòttìídíyíúkúdí / úfúdítímmíjí
Nubian, Northern Nobiin (1)weː˥ru˥wwo˥tu˥sko˥ke˥mso˥di˧dʒɡo˥rdʒo˥ko˧lo˧di˥dwo˥o˧sko˧ddi˥me˥
Nubian, Northern Nobiin (2)wèer/ wéerúwwótúskú / tískókémsódìj / dìjìɡórjókòlòdídwóòskòd / òskòdidímé
Nubian, Central, Hill, Kadaru-Ghulfan Kadaru bèèòrótèɟɟúkkèɲɟútìccʊ́kɔ́rʃʊ́kɔ́ladʊ́ɪ̀d̪d̪ɔ́wìɪd̪ɔ́bùɽè
Nubian, Central, Hill, Kadaru-Ghulfan Ghulfan bɛróratóǰukkɪ́ɲuʈiʃúkwúrʃukwalátɪ́dduwìítbuɽé
Nubian, Central, Hill, Unclassified Dilling beeoreetujjuŋ j = dʒ or ɟ ?kimmiɲiticci c = tʃ or c ?kʷarcukʷaladɪddɪwitbure
Nyimang Afitti àndáàrmákàcúpkòrsíkmúlmàndármàrámdùváàdìsólòtúmbùrà
Nyimang Ama (Nyimang) ɲálāārbāāsákùd̪òmūlkūrʃkūlād̪èd̪òwìèd̪òfòɽó
Tama, Mararit Mararit (Mararet) kára~kún / karrewarɪ / warreètte~ítí / atayekow / ɡawmáai / mayetúur / tuurkul / kuurikàkàwák / kokuak (4+ 4)kàrkʌ́s / kekeristók / toɡ
Tama, Tama-Sungor Sungor (Assangori) kurwáriécàkúsmásitɔ̀rkálkíbísúkùmɛ̀r
Tama, Tama-Sungor Tama (1)kúˑrwárííɕíkús /kusmassi / masitɔˑ́rkâlkímísúkūmír
Tama, Tama-Sungor Tama (2)kʊ́rʊ́wɛ̀rːɛ̀ɪ̀cːáʔkʊʃmasɛːt̪ɔ́rːkəlkíbìsʊ́kːʊ́mɛ̀ːr
Daju, Eastern Daju Liguri Daju (Logorik) nɔhɔrɔkpɛtdaxkɔdɔstɛspɛtmdɛkkɔskɔdɔs (2 x 3)tɛspɛtkɔdɔs (4 + 3)tɛspɛttɛspɛt (4 + 4)mdɛktɛspɛt (5 + 4)saʔasɛɲ
Daju, Eastern Daju Shatt Damam núuxùpɨ̀dàxkòdòstèspètmɨ̀dɨ̀káarànpàxtíndìɲkòs(s)èndàŋ tèspédèspè {four.four}dábàs(s)éndàŋ ~bây.núuxùàsìɲ
Daju, Western Daju Dar Dadju Daju mùnɡúnfìdà /pîdakòdɔ̀stɛ̀spɛ̀tmòdùkàràŋfàktíndíkòsóndábìstóndáàsíŋ
Daju, Western Daju Dar Sila Daju (1)ùŋɡʊ̀nbìdàkkòdòstìʃɛ̀tmùdùk(ʔ)àràn ~ (ʔ)àrânfáktíndìkòohándàbìstándààsîŋ
Daju, Western Daju Dar Sila Daju (2)ʊ́ŋɡʊ́nbíd̪ákkɔ̀d̪ɔst̪ɪ̀ʃɛ́ːθmúd̪ukárān̪fáθɪ́nd̪ɪ́kɔ̀ánd̪abɪ̀sθánd̪aásːɪŋ
Eastern Jebel, Gaam Gaahmɡ (Tabi) (1)t̪āmánd̪áāɡɡɔ́ðɔ̄yə̄ə̄sə́áás-ááman (lit: 'hand')t̪ə́ld̪ìɡɡíd̪iɡɡ-ɔ́ðɔ̄ (lit: 'eyes-two')íd̪iɡ-dáāɡɡ (lit: 'eyes-three')íd̪iɡ-yə̄ə̄sə́ (lit: 'eyes-four')ə́sēɡ-dí (lit: 'hands-also')
Eastern Jebel, Gaam Gaahmɡ (Tabi) (2)tamandiɔk / diakoða / ʔodayɛsu /yɛzanʌsumʌntɛltɛk /tɛldɛktauðuk / idakʼdiak (5 + 2)kurbaiti /idukʼʔoda (5 + 3)akaitɛn / idukʼyɛsu (5 + 4)ʔasiɡdi

References

  1. Güldemann, Tom (2018). "Historical linguistics and genealogical language classification in Africa". In Güldemann, Tom (ed.). The Languages and Linguistics of Africa. The World of Linguistics series. Vol. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 299–308. doi:10.1515/9783110421668-002. ISBN   978-3-11-042606-9. S2CID   133888593.

Bibliography