European spruce bark beetle

Last updated

European spruce bark beetle
Ips typographus (female).jpg
Female
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Coleoptera
Suborder: Polyphaga
Infraorder: Cucujiformia
Family: Curculionidae
Genus: Ips
Species:
I. typographus
Binomial name
Ips typographus
Synonyms

Dermestes typographusL.
Bostrichus octodentatusPaykull
Ips japonicus Niijima
Tomicus typographusMotschulsky

Contents

The European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus), also called the eight-toothed spruce bark beetle, [1] is a species of beetle in the weevil subfamily Scolytinae, the bark beetles, and is found in Europe, Asia Minor and east to China, Japan, and Korea. [2] [3] It is a serious pest of Norway spruce; in Britain, where spruce is the main tree used for timber, it has been called "public enemy number one" of the over 1,400 pests and diseases on the government's plant health risk register. [4]

Taxonomy

The species was first described as Dermestes typographus by the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus in 1758. [3] He gave it the specific name "typographus" (engraver), and it acquired the common name "engraver beetle" for the appearance of the galleries it makes in wood. [3]

In 1800, the Swedish naturalist Gustaf von Paykull described it as Bostrichus octodentatus. [5] [3] In 1860, the Russian entomologist Victor Motschulsky synonymised the species as Tomicus typographus. [5] In 1909, the Japanese entomologist Yoshinao Niijima described it as Ips japonicus; his generic name remains accepted for the species. [5] [3] Ips is a genus of bark beetles in the subfamily Scolytinae, in the beetle family Curculionidae. [6]

Biology

Description

Adult, pupa, and larva Koroed-tipograph.jpg
Adult, pupa, and larva

Adults are 4.2–5.5 millimetres (0.17–0.22 in) long, cylindrical, dark brown beetles. A large domed shield covers both the thorax and the head as viewed from the top; the eyes, antennae, and mouthparts protrude below the shield as seen from the side. The upper half of the abdomen is covered by the large elytra (wing-cases), which are marked with rows of small pits and which have four spines at each margin. There are yellow hairs around the sides of the body and between the elytra. [7]

The beetles reproduce in the inner bark (phloem [8] ) of their host trees. Eggs, larvae, pupae and adults can all hibernate in their galleries below the bark of host trees. Adults can also overwinter in forest leaf litter or under snow that is at least 20cm deep. All stages overwintering in the bark of standing trees are killed by winter temperatures below -24°C. When the air temperature reaches around 18–20°C in spring, the adults start to fly. [8] They travel up to half a mile in search of a vulnerable host. The adults burrow through the weakened bark of the host to build tunnels. [9]

Gallery in wood. The broad tunnel from left to right is a maternal gallery. The eggs were laid along its sides in small niches. The larvae hatched from these and bored tunnels off to the side (tunnels running roughly vertically in the image). Some whitish larvae can be seen in holes in the top half of the image; the tunnels below the maternal gallery are mainly filled with reddish-brown frass. Kuuse-kooreurask ja tegutsemisjaljed Ips typographus.jpg
Gallery in wood. The broad tunnel from left to right is a maternal gallery. The eggs were laid along its sides in small niches. The larvae hatched from these and bored tunnels off to the side (tunnels running roughly vertically in the image). Some whitish larvae can be seen in holes in the top half of the image; the tunnels below the maternal gallery are mainly filled with reddish-brown frass.

The male hollows out a mating chamber, where between 1 and 4 females arrive to mate. Each female then creates a maternal gallery which runs in the same direction (vertically, if the tree is upright) as the phloem tubes. In warm conditions, she lays some 80 eggs, one at a time in separate niches on either side of the maternal gallery. There are fewer eggs in cold conditions. [8]

The adults release pheromones which attract more individuals to the host tree. Two to five weeks after infesting a tree, they may migrate to another host and repeat the process. [9] In the far north and in mountains, there may be only one generation annually; in lowland Europe, there are often two generations, while in the warmest conditions there can be three generations in a year. [8]

The egg, below 1 millimetre (0.039 in) long, is whitish grey. The larva and pupa are whitish and reach about the same size as the adult. The larva is cylindrical, without legs; its head and jaws are brown. [8] The larva makes a tunnel off to the side of the maternal gallery, and feeds on the phloem, not tunneling into the wood. If there is a sustained attack by enough larvae, the tree is eventually girdled, cutting off the phloem and killing the tree. [10]

Ecology

Bark beetle and woodpecker signs on spruce bark, 2007, Bialowieza National Park, Poland. Woodpeckers often split off infested bark to feed on the beetle larvae. Bark beetle and woodpecker signs on spruce bark, May 2007, Bialowieza National Park, Poland.jpg
Bark beetle and woodpecker signs on spruce bark, 2007, Białowieża National Park, Poland. Woodpeckers often split off infested bark to feed on the beetle larvae.

European spruce bark beetle outbreaks are major natural disturbances in Europe's forests, as significant as storm damage. [4] Some scientists consider the species to be a keystone species, [11] because it has an unusually high number of relationships with other organisms in the community, and because it changes its environment so drastically. [12]

Bark beetles are associated with species of fungi in the order Ophiostomatales, most often Ophiostoma bicolor, O. penicillatum, Ceratocystiopsis minuta, and C. polonica, with O. piceaperdum somewhat less common. Some of the fungi may help to regulate damage caused by the beetles. [13] C. polonica on the other hand is a pathogen that can kill healthy trees by hindering the upward flow of water, wilting its foliage. It stains the wood with blue streaks, destroying its commercial value. [14] The pits in the beetle's elytra help to carry fungal spores to uninfected trees, possibly facilitating beetle outbreaks. [15]

Healthy trees use defenses by producing resin [4] or latex, which contain insecticidal and fungicidal compounds that kill or injure attacking insects. But when trees are stressed, and under outbreak conditions, the beetles can overwhelm the tree's defenses. [4] Woodpeckers may help to regulate beetle populations in diverse coniferous forest landscapes. [16] Woodpeckers feed on the larvae, splitting off the bark to reach them. [8] The species is somewhat larger than the bark beetle Pityogenes chalcographus ; the species appear to reduce direct interspecific competition by selecting parts of the tree according to their size. Thus, I. typographus mostly selects lower parts of the tree with thicker bark, while P. chalcographus prefers higher parts with thinner bark as it is outcompeted in thick bark. [17]

Bark beetles communicate with one another using semiochemicals, compounds or mixtures that carry messages. [18] They can sense green leaf volatiles such as 1-Hexanol from trees. [19]

European bark beetles have the ability to spread quickly over large areas. Long-distance movements may have contributed to their invasion of northern Norway spruce forests. [20] Such movements can be triggered by environmental factors such as severe storms, drought, or mass fungal infections that damage or kill host trees. [21]

Distribution

The beetle is distributed across Europe except for Ireland, Portugal, and the Caucasus; Algeria, Turkey, and Iran; and Russia, northern China, Korea, Japan, and Kazakhstan. It has occurred transiently in Britain. It occupies both lowland and upland forests. [8]

The abundance of Norway spruce in Europe's forests has made it the main target of the beetle. [3] Other tree species in the genera Picea (spruce), Abies (fir), Pinus (pine), and Larix (larch) are also attacked. [3] The most recent spruce bark beetle invasive outbreaks have occurred mainly in fallen, diseased or damaged Norway spruce. [21]

Though it specializes on Norway spruce, it is not distributed throughout the tree's range. Climate may have limited its ability to persist in the northernmost spruce forests. Other researchers argue that the beetle populations in those regions have an active, directed host searching ability and are not equipped for long-range dispersal. [22]

Forestry

Economic impact

Stand of trees killed by the beetle in the Harz mountains, 2005 Baumleichen4.JPG
Stand of trees killed by the beetle in the Harz mountains, 2005

European spruce bark beetle outbreaks can be locally devastating for the lumber industry. [4] The beetle is a serious pest of forestry; [23] the British government's register of risks to plant health identifies it as the topmost risk, "public enemy number one". [4]

Detection

Sticky Borregard trap with European spruce bark beetles and Thanasimus formicarius beetles Borregaard traps 3 for ips typographus bialowieza forest beentree.jpg
Sticky Borregard trap with European spruce bark beetles and Thanasimus formicarius beetles

Spruce beetles usually infest the lower and middle parts of trunks. Trees that have been attacked are easy to recognize by concentrations of brown dust from bark at the basal areas of stems and trunks. However, sometimes apparently infected trees with green crowns can be without bark because of larval and woodpecker activity. Other common ways that infection can be detected is the presence of red-brown dust (frass) in bark crevices, many round exit holes, or small pitch tubes extruding from the bark. Large populations can be detected from a distance by patches of red foliage. [24]

Prevention and control methods

Several methods have been proposed to prevent the start of beetle outbreaks. Some suggest using "trap trees" at the beginning of each reproductive cycle. This should be done in March, May, and again in late June or early July. The trap trees should be debarked when distinct larval galleries with small larvae are found. Another method is clearcutting, removing sections of trees at the first signs of infestation. Pheromone traps can capture thousands of bark beetles, [25] but while some studies found a strong reduction of damage in locations with pheromone traps, [26] others found no effect or a slight increase in the risk of new attacks when pheromone traps were used. [27]

In Britain, the main source of infestation has been insects carried by winds across the English Channel from continental Europe. [4] In 2025 it was claimed that the beetle had been eradicated from risk areas in the east and south east by the combined use of monitoring using drones, inspection on the ground and sniffer dogs, along with the use of pheromone traps to detect and suppress beetle infestations. Climate change may increase the risk in future. [4]

Effects of interventions

Intervention for beetle outbreaks has been controversial in the Šumava National Park in the Bohemian Forest of the Czech Republic. Some authorities suggest that outbreaks be allowed to run their course, even at the expense of most of the forest. Others, including the lumber industry, request intervention. [11] Some experts argue that salvage logging tends to have a greater negative effect on the vegetation than the bark beetle outbreak alone. A 2008 study of the effects of forestry interventions on the herb and moss layers of infested mountain spruce forests suggest that without intervention the forests do eventually recover. Salvage logging also had negative effects on species composition, delaying recovery. [28]

References

  1. "Ips typographus (Linnaeus, 1758)". NBN Atlas. Retrieved 31 August 2025.
  2. "European spruce bark beetle" (PDF). Michigan State University. February 2010. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Larger eight-toothed European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus)". Forest Research . Retrieved 25 March 2025.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Stallard, Esme; Rowlatt, Justin (31 August 2025). "Dogs and drones join forest battle against eight-toothed beetle". BBC News.
  5. 1 2 3 "Ips typographus: Pest Information". Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs . Retrieved 31 August 2025.
  6. "Ips typographus(IPSXTY)". EPPO Global Database . Retrieved 31 August 2025.
  7. "Ips typographus (Linnaeus)" (PDF). Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey, Purdue University. February 2013. Retrieved 31 August 2025.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "EPPO Datasheet: Ips typographus". EPPO. Retrieved 31 August 2025.
  9. 1 2 Svoboda, M.; Fraver, Shawn; Janda, Pavel; Bače, Radek; Zenáhlíková, Jitka (2010). "Natural development and regeneration of a Central European montane spruce forest". Forest Ecology and Management . 260 (5): 707–714. Bibcode:2010ForEM.260..707S. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.027.
  10. Hlasny, Tomas; et al. (2019). Living with bark beetles: impacts, outlook and management options (PDF). European Forest Institute. pp. 8–11. ISBN   978-952-5980-75-2.
  11. 1 2 Svoboda, M.; et al. (2010). "Natural development and regeneration of a Central European montane spruce forest". Forest Ecology and Management . 260 (5): 707–714. Bibcode:2010ForEM.260..707S. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.027.
  12. Müller, Jörg; Bußler, Heinz; Goßner, Martin; Rettelbach, Thomas; Duelli, Peter (2008). "The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a national park: from pest to keystone species". Biodiversity and Conservation. 17 (12): 2979–3001. Bibcode:2008BiCon..17.2979M. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9409-1. S2CID   23644339.
  13. Viiri, Heli; Lieutier, François (2004). "Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus, in three areas in France" (PDF). Annals of Forest Science. 61 (3): 215–219. doi: 10.1051/forest:2004013 .
  14. Kirkendall, L. R. & M. Faccoli (2010). "Bark beetles and pinhole borers (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Platypodinae) alien to Europe" (PDF). ZooKeys (56): 227–251. Bibcode:2010ZooK...56..227K. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.56.529 . PMC   3088324 . PMID   21594183.
  15. Six, Diana L.; Wingfield, Michael J. (7 January 2011). "The Role of Phytopathogenicity in Bark Beetle–Fungus Symbioses: A Challenge to the Classic Paradigm" (PDF). Annual Review of Entomology. 56 (1): 255–272. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144839 .
  16. Fayt, Philippe; Machmer, Marlene M.; Steeger, Christoph (2005). "Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers—a literature review". Forest Ecology and Management. 206 (1–3): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.054.
  17. Schebeck, Martin; Schopf, Axel; Ragland, Gregory J.; Stauffer, Christian; Biedermann, Peter H. W. (2023). "Evolutionary ecology of the bark beetles Ips typographus and Pityogenes chalcographus". Bulletin of Entomological Research. 113 (1): 1–10. doi: 10.1017/S0007485321000353 .
  18. Horn, A.; et al. (2009). "Complex postglacial history of the temperate bark beetle Tomicus piniperda L. (Coleoptera, Scolytinae)". Heredity . 103 (3): 238–247. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.48 . PMID   19401712.
  19. Zhang, Qing-He; Birgersson, Göran; Zhu, Junwei; Löfstedt, Christer; Löfqvist, Jan; Schlyter, Fredrik (1999). "Leaf Volatiles from Nonhost Deciduous Trees: Variation by Tree Species, Season and Temperature, and Electrophysiological Activity in Ips typographus". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 25 (8): 1923–1943. doi:10.1023/A:1020994119019.
  20. Jankowiak, R.; Kolarik, M. (2010). "Fungi associated with the fir bark beetle Cryphalus piceae in Poland". Forest Pathology . 40 (2): 133–144. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0329.2009.00620.x.
  21. 1 2 Mezei, P.; Jakus, R.; Blazenec, M.; Belanova, S.; Šmidt, J. (2011). "Population dynamics of spruce bark beetle in a nature reserve in relation to stand edges condition". Folia Oecologica. 38 (1): 73–79.
  22. Arthofer, Wolfgang; Riegler, Markus; Avtzis, Dimitrios N.; Stauffer, Christian (2009). "Evidence for low-titre infections in insect symbioses: Wolbachia in the bark beetle Pityogenes chalcographus (Coleoptera, Scolytinae)". Environmental Microbiology . 11 (8): 1923–1933. Bibcode:2009EnvMi..11.1923W. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01914.x . PMID   19383035.
  23. Lee, J. C.; Seybold, S. J. (2010). "Host acceptance and larval competition in the banded and European elm bark beetles, Scolytus schevyrewi and S. multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): potential mechanisms for competitive displacement between invasive species". Journal of Insect Behavior. 23 (1): 19–34. Bibcode:2010JIBeh..23...19L. doi:10.1007/s10905-009-9192-1. S2CID   5951378.
  24. Seidl, R.; et al. (2009). "Modelling bark beetle disturbances in a large scale forest scenario model to assess climate change impacts and evaluate adaptive". Regional Environmental Change. 9 (2): 101–119. doi:10.1007/s10113-008-0068-2. S2CID   55193922.
  25. Galko, Juraj; Nikolov, Christo; Kunca, Andrej; Vakula, Jozef; Gubka, Andrej; Zúbrik, Milan; Rell, Slavomír; Konôpka, Bohdan (1 December 2016). "Effectiveness of pheromone traps for the European spruce bark beetle: a comparative study of four commercial products and two new models" (PDF). Forestry Journal. 62 (4): 207–215. doi: 10.1515/forj-2016-0027 .
  26. Faccoli, Massimo; Stergulc, Fabio (2008). "Damage reduction and performance of mass trapping devices for forest protection against the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (Coleoptera Curculionidae Scolytinae)". Annals of Forest Science. 65 (3): 309–309. doi: 10.1051/forest:2008010 .
  27. Kuhn, Alexandre; Hautier, Louis; San Martin, Gilles (28 September 2022). "Do pheromone traps help to reduce new attacks of Ips typographus at the local scale after a sanitary cut?". PeerJ. 10: e14093. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14093 . PMC   9526401 . PMID   36193434.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
  28. Jonášová, M.; Prach, K. (2008). "The influence of bark beetles outbreak vs. salvage logging on ground layer vegetation in Central European mountain spruce forests" (PDF). Biological Conservation . 141 (6): 1525–1535. Bibcode:2008BCons.141.1525J. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.013.