Great Comet of 1577

Last updated
Great Comet of 1577
Von einem Schrecklichen vnd Wunderbarlichen Cometen so sich den Dienstag nach Martini dieses lauffenden M. D. Lxxvij. Jahrs am Himmel erzeiget hat (grayscale).png
The Great Comet of 1577, seen over Prague on November 12. Engraving made by Jiri Daschitzky.
Discovery
Discovery dateNovember 1, 1577
Designations
C/1577 V1

The Great Comet of 1577 is a non-periodic comet that passed close to Earth with first observation being possible in Peru on November 1 1577. [1] Final observation was made on January 26, 1578. [2] The comet's official designation is C/1577 V1. [3] Tycho Brahe was one the most distinguished observers of this comet, making thousands of precise measurements about it. The observations made by Brahe led him to believe the comet was outside of the orbit of the sun and moon. [4] There were many independent observers of the comet from across the world. [5] Many had different explanations for the comet. Some, such as Sultan Murad III, saw the comet as an evil omen. [6] Others took a scientific approach, like Michael Mästlin who used the comet to fill gaps in Copernicus's model of the universe. [7] It inspired artists, like Jiri Dschitzky, who made an engraving of the comet as it passed over Prague. [8] Currently, using JPL Horizons, it is believed that the comet is 324 AU (48.5 billion km) from the sun. [9]

Contents

Observations by Tycho Brahe

The city of Ferrara and the Great Comet of 1577. Ferrara's economy collapsed due to the 1570 earthquake H. J. Helden, Ferrara distrutta dal terremoto del 1570.jpg
The city of Ferrara and the Great Comet of 1577. Ferrara's economy collapsed due to the 1570 earthquake

Tycho Brahe, who is said to have first viewed the comet slightly before sunset on November 13 [10] after having returned from a day of fishing, [11] was the most distinguished observer and documenter of the comet's passing.

Sketches found in one of Brahe's notebooks seem to indicate that the comet travelled close to Venus. These sketches depict the Earth at the centre of the Solar System, with the Sun and moon in orbit and the other planets revolving around the Sun, a model that was later displaced by heliocentricity. [12] Brahe made thousands of very precise measurements of the comet's path, and these findings contributed to Johannes Kepler's theorizing of the laws of planetary motion and realization that the planets moved in elliptical orbits. [13] Brahe made these measurements using a 16 inch radius quadrant, which he used to measure the altitude and azimuth of the comet. [14] In order to compare to the comet to known stationary celestial objects Brahe used a simple sextant which was simply a graduated sixth of a circle. [14] Kepler, who was Brahe's assistant during his time in Prague, believed that the comet's behavior and existence was proof enough to displace the theory of celestial spheres, although this view turned out to be overly optimistic about the pace of change. [15]

In 2013 the distance between the Sun and comet C/1577 V1 was about 320 AU. C 1577 V1.png
In 2013 the distance between the Sun and comet C/1577 V1 was about 320 AU.

Brahe's discovery that the comet's coma faced away from the Sun was also significant.

One failing of Brahe's measurements was in exactly how far out of the atmosphere the comet was, and he was unable to supply meaningful and correct figures for this distance; [17] however, he was, at least, successful in proving that the comet was beyond the orbit of the Moon about the Earth, [11] and, further to this, was probably near three times further away. [15] He did this by comparing the position of the comet in the night sky where he observed it (the island Hven, near Copenhagen) with the position observed by Thadaeus Hagecius (Tadeáš Hájek) in Prague at the same time, giving deliberate consideration to the movement of the Moon. It was discovered that, while the comet was in approximately the same place for both of them, the Moon was not, and this meant that the comet was much further out. [18]

Brahe's finding that comets were heavenly objects, while widely accepted, was the cause of debate up until and during the seventeenth century, with many theories circulating within the astronomical community. Galileo claimed that comets were optical phenomena, and that this made their parallaxes impossible to measure. However, his hypothesis was not widely accepted. [17]

Observations around the World

Using all the records to estimate the orbit, it seems that the perihelion was on October 27. The first recorded observation is from Peru on November 1: [19] the accounts noted that it was seen through the clouds like the Moon. It is recorded in the Codex Aubin as appearing on Wednesday 6 November 1577 as a “smoking star” in the Nahuatl-language text of folio 60v. On November 7, in Ferrara, Italy, architect Pirro Ligorio described "the comet shimmering from a burning fire inside the dazzling cloud." [20] On November 8, it was reported by Japanese astronomers with a Moon-like brightness and a white tail spanning over 60 degrees. [21] [19]

Several other observers [22] recorded seeing the comet: The astronomer Taqi al-Din Muhammad ibn Ma'ruf [23] recorded the passage of the comet. The Sultan Murad III saw these observations as a bad omen for the war and blamed al-Din for the plague which spread at the time. [24] Other observers include Helisaeus Roeslin, William IV, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, [25] Cornelius Gemma, who noted the comet had two tails [19] [26] and Michael Mästlin [27] also identified it as superlunary. This comet and the observation that it was traveling on the earth’s atmosphere was also what helped Maestlin to explain the gaps in Copernicus’s planetary system. According to Maestlin, a comet would carry its own orb, since he considered comets to be part of the heavenly objects. These orbs, he suggested, are what fill the gaps in Copernicus’s system. [28]

Additionally it was independently observed by Indian observers Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak and Ārif Qandahārī recorded the comet's passing and believed the comet influenced assassination of Shah Ismail of Persia, son of Shah tahmasp on 26 November 1577. [29] Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak recorded the comet's passage in his Akbarnama, [30] noting that the comet had a long tail and was visible for 5 months. [31] Ārif Qandahārī treated the comet as a brilliant sight and assigned no explicit evil. [32] In his account of Tārikh-i Akbar Shāhī . [19] Described the comet as a bright star with many small fragments appearing like a Cyprus tree, becoming known as the long tailed star. [33]

As a young boy, Johannes Kepler was taken by his mother to see the comet. [34] [35]

In art and literature

Cometographia, a book on the Great Comet of 1577, by Laurence Johnson Houghton STC 1416 - Cometographia, 1578.jpg
Cometographia, a book on the Great Comet of 1577, by Laurence Johnson

The literature resulting from the passing of the comet was prolific, and these works, as well as the ideas presented by many astronomers, caused much controversy. However, the idea that comets were heavenly objects became a respected theory, and many took this concept to be true. [17] Artwork inspired by the event was also made—artist Jiri Daschitzky made an engraving that was inspired by the passing of the comet over Prague on November 12, 1577. Cornelis Ketel painted the portrait of Richard Goodricke around 1578. Goodricke had reached adulthood in 1577 and apparently saw the comet as an omen and had it included in the painting. Roeslin also produced one of the more complex of the representations of the Great Comet, described as "an interesting, though crude, attempt". [36] In Chaim Vital's book the book of visions, which is a book describing the meaning behind different dreams and omens, Vital simply describes the comet and offers no explanation as to what it could mean. [37] At the time there were also numerous comet tracts made of the comet as it went across the sky. [38] These were made by Tycho Brahe and numerous other astronomers at the time. [38] There were also numerous prints in early newspapers called broadsides. [39] These broadsides shared news about this comet to the general populace. [39]

Contemporary references

The comet was mentioned in the 17th century Vietnamese chronicle Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư , Book 17, part 1: "In November 1577 (lunar calendar), comet appears, pointing at the southeastern sky, its luminous tail is as long as 40 zhàng with rose and purple tint, everyone was frightened. On first date of December, the comet disappears". Due to this observation, King Lê Thế Tông changed his era name to Quang Hưng (光興) meaning bright and rising in the next year, 1578.

The comet was also recorded by Chinese historians in History of Ming , Book 27, Treatises, Astronomy part 3.

This comet was mentioned in the book entitled Sêfer Chazionot – The Book Of Visions by Rabbi Hayyim ben Joseph Vital: "1577. Rosh Hodesh Kislev (November 11), after sunrise, a large star with a long tail, pointing upward, was seen in the southwestern part of the sky. Part of the tail was also pointing eastward. It lingered there for three hours. Then it sank in the west behind the hills of Safed. This continued for more than fifty nights. On the fifteenth of Kislev, I went to live in Jerusalem".

In Ireland, the Great Comet was observed, and an account of its passing was later inserted in the Annals of the Four Masters : "A wonderful star appeared in the south-east in the first month of winter: it had a curved bow-like tail, resembling bright lightning, the brilliancy of which illuminated the earth around, and the firmament above. This star was seen in every part of the west of Europe, and it was wondered at by all universally." [40]

Henry Howard, Earl of Northampton, in his polemic A defensative against the poyson of supposed prophesies (1583, [sig. V iv]) described as an eyewitness the way Elizabeth I responded to the comet:

"How many Comets have been seen within these five and twenty years, before and after which, her majesty hath ever increased, rather than appayred [adversely affected] the sound state of her body? I can affirm thus much, as a present witness by mine own experience· that when divers upon greater scrupulosity then cause, went about to dissuade her majesty (lying then at Richmond) from looking on the Comet which appeared last: with a courage answerable to the greatness of her state, she caused the window to be set open, and cast out this word [motto, quotation] Iacta est alia the dice are thrown, affirming that her steadfast hope and confidence was too firmly planted in the providence of God, to be blasted or affrighted with those beams, which either had a ground in nature whereupon to rise, or at least no warrant out of scripture, to portend the mishaps of Princes. Behold a woman and a Queen, which seem to be the kinds and callings, upon which the Comets (if Astrologers speak truth) are wont to prey: and yet not only she relenteth not to common fear, but insulteth rather upon common folly. That the Comets hinder not the lives of Princes, I have proved heretofore at large, and shall have opportunity likewise to confirm hereafter, but thus much I dare affirm, that albeit the malice of the same were no less to be feared then some think: yet her contented mind, her harmless thoughts, her temperance in diet, abstinence from excess of all things that offend, with moderation of exercise, were enough to verify that proverb which hath been rife of old, Sapiens domabitur astris [‘the wise subdue the stars’]."

Queen Elizabeth's audacity in demonstratively placing her trust in God's protection, rather than fearing the comet as a bad omen to princes such as her, was a significant rejection of comets as heavenly signs of misfortune to follow. The anecdote was cited in an anonymous pamphlet prompted by the Great Comet of 1680, The Petitioning-comet, or, A Brief chronology of all the famous comets and their events that have happen'd from the birth of Christ, to this very day : together with a modest enquiry into this present comet.

Notes

  1. ↑ Kapoor, R. C. (2015). "Abū'l Faẓl, independent discoverer of the Great Comet of 1577". Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 18 (3): 249–260. Bibcode:2015JAHH...18..249K. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2015.03.03. S2CID   209912868.
  2. ↑ Hale, Alan (2020-11-08). "Comet of the Week: "Tycho Brahe's Comet" C/1577 V1". RocketSTEM. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  3. ↑ "COMET NAMES AND DESIGNATIONS". www.icq.eps.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  4. ↑ Grant, p. 305
  5. ↑ Moritz Valentin Steinmetz: Von dem Cometen welcher im November des 1577. Jars erstlich erschienen, und noch am Himmel zusehen ist, wie er von Abend und Mittag, gegen Morgen und Mitternacht zu, seinen Fortgang gehabt, Observirt und beschrieben in Leipzig ..., Gedruckt bey Nickel Nerlich Formschneider, 1577 Archived 2015-03-22 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ↑ "The Story of the Two Astronomers Who Studied the Great Comet of 1577". Interesting Engineering. September 5, 2016.
  7. ↑ Barker, P., & Goldstein, B. R. (2001). Theological foundations of Keplers astronomy. Ithaca, NY.
  8. ↑ Robert S. Westman, "The Comet and the Cosmos: Kepler, Mästlin, and the Copernican Hypothesis", in The Reception of Copernicus' Heliocentric Theory: Proceedings of a Symposium Organized by the Nicolas Copernicus Committee of the International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science, Torun, Poland, 1973 (Springer, 1973), pp. 10 and 28. For a description and reproduction of Helisaeus Roeslin's diagram, see pp. 28–29 online.
  9. ↑ NASA JPL Horizons ephemeris 2023-2030
  10. ↑ Seargent, p. 105
  11. 1 2 Grant, p. 305
  12. ↑ "The comet of 1577". Archived from the original on 7 March 2012. Retrieved 25 March 2007.
  13. ↑ Gilster, p. 100
  14. 1 2 Gingerich, Owen (1977). Tycho Brahe and the great comet of 1577. pp. 452–458.
  15. 1 2 Seargent, p. 107
  16. ↑ NASA JPL Horizons ephemeris 2023-2030
  17. 1 2 3 "The Galileo Project" . Retrieved 25 March 2007.
  18. ↑ Lang, p. 240
  19. 1 2 3 4 Kapoor, R. C. (2015). "Abū'l Faẓl, independent discoverer of the Great Comet of 1577". Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 18 (3): 249–260. Bibcode:2015JAHH...18..249K. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2015.03.03. S2CID   209912868.
  20. ↑ Ginette Vagenheim (2014). "Une description inédite de la grande comète de 1577 par Pirro Ligorio avec une note sur la rédaction des Antichità Romane à la cour du duc Alphonse II de Ferrare". La Festa delle Arti (in French): 304–305.
  21. ↑ Rao, Joe (December 23, 2013). "'Comets of the Centuries': 500 Years of the Greatest Comets Ever Seen". space.com.
  22. ↑ Moritz Valentin Steinmetz: Von dem Cometen welcher im November des 1577. Jars erstlich erschienen, und noch am Himmel zusehen ist, wie er von Abend und Mittag, gegen Morgen und Mitternacht zu, seinen Fortgang gehabt, Observirt und beschrieben in Leipzig ..., Gedruckt bey Nickel Nerlich Formschneider, 1577 Archived 2015-03-22 at the Wayback Machine
  23. ↑ Ünver, Ahmet Süheyl (1985). İstanbul Rasathanesi. Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Türk Tarih Kurumu yayınları. pp. 3–6.
  24. ↑ "The Story of the Two Astronomers Who Studied the Great Comet of 1577". Interesting Engineering. September 5, 2016.
  25. ↑ Tofigh Heidarzadeh. A History of Physical Theories of Comets, From Aristotle to Whipple. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 47.
  26. ↑ Gemma, Cornelius (1577). De naturae divinis characterismis. Antwerpen: Plantin, Christophe.
  27. ↑ J J O'Connor and E F Robertson. "biography of Michael Mästlin".
  28. ↑ Barker, P., & Goldstein, B. R. (2001). Theological foundations of Keplers astronomy. Ithaca, NY.
  29. ↑ Moosvi, Shireen (1997). "Science and Superstition under Akbar and Jahangir: The Observation of Astronomical Phenomena". In Habib, Irfan (ed.). Akbar and his India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 109–120. ISBN   0195637917.
  30. ↑ Kapoor, R. C. (2015). "Abū'l Faẓl, independent discoverer of the Great Comet of 1577". Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 18 (3): 249–260. Bibcode:2015JAHH...18..249K. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2015.03.03. S2CID   209912868.
  31. ↑ FAZL, ABU-L. BEVERIDGE, H. (ed.). "THE AKBARNAMA Vol. III - PHI Persian Literature in Translation". persian.packhum.org. p. CHAPTER XL. EXPEDITION OF H.M. TO THE PANJAB, THE APPEARANCE OF THE COMET, ETC. Archived from the original on 4 June 2010. Retrieved 2024-04-20.
  32. ↑ Moosvi, Shireen (1997). "Science and Superstition under Akbar and Jahangir: The Observation of Astronomical Phenomena". In Habib, Irfan (ed.). Akbar and his India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 109–120. ISBN   0195637917.
  33. ↑ Moosvi, Shireen (1997). "Science and Superstition under Akbar and Jahangir: The Observation of Astronomical Phenomena". In Habib, Irfan (ed.). Akbar and his India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 109–120. ISBN   0195637917.
  34. ↑ Of Albion, Martin (November 1, 2017). "Great Astronomers: Johannes Kepler". Great Astronomers: Johannes Kepler. Retrieved 2019-12-22.
  35. ↑ "How Johannes Kepler revolutionized astronomy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-12-22. Retrieved 2019-12-22.
  36. ↑ Robert S. Westman, "The Comet and the Cosmos: Kepler, Mästlin, and the Copernican Hypothesis", in The Reception of Copernicus' Heliocentric Theory: Proceedings of a Symposium Organized by the Nicolas Copernicus Committee of the International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science, Torun, Poland, 1973 (Springer, 1973), pp. 10 and 28. For a description and reproduction of Helisaeus Roeslin's diagram, see pp. 28–29 online.
  37. ↑ Faierstein, Morris M.; Vital, Ḥayyim ben Joseph; Safrin, Isaac Judah Jehiel, eds. (1999). Jewish mystical autobiographies: Book of visions and Book of secrets. The classics of Western spirituality. New York: Paulist Press. ISBN   978-0-8091-0504-5.
  38. 1 2 "(1) Front cover - Catalogue of the Crawford Library of the Royal Observatory, Edinburgh - Bibliotheca Lindesiana catalogues - National Library of Scotland". digital.nls.uk. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  39. 1 2 Schechner, Sara (1997). Comets, popular culture, and the birth of modern cosmology. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-22767-2.
  40. ↑ http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/T100005E/text008.html Annals of the Four Masters (M1577.20)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of astronomy</span>

Astronomy is the oldest of the natural sciences, dating back to antiquity, with its origins in the religious, mythological, cosmological, calendrical, and astrological beliefs and practices of prehistory: vestiges of these are still found in astrology, a discipline long interwoven with public and governmental astronomy. It was not completely separated in Europe during the Copernican Revolution starting in 1543. In some cultures, astronomical data was used for astrological prognostication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Johannes Kepler</span> German astronomer and mathematician (1571–1630)

Johannes Kepler was a German astronomer, mathematician, astrologer, natural philosopher and writer on music. He is a key figure in the 17th-century Scientific Revolution, best known for his laws of planetary motion, and his books Astronomia nova, Harmonice Mundi, and Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae, influencing among others Isaac Newton, providing one of the foundations for his theory of universal gravitation. The variety and impact of his work made Kepler one of the founders and fathers of modern astronomy, the scientific method, natural and modern science. He has been described as the "father of science fiction" for his novel Somnium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tycho Brahe</span> Danish astronomer (1546–1601)

Tycho Brahe, generally called Tycho for short, was a Danish astronomer of the Renaissance, known for his comprehensive and unprecedentedly accurate astronomical observations. He was known during his lifetime as an astronomer, astrologer, and alchemist. He was the last major astronomer before the invention of the telescope. Tycho Brahe has also been described as the greatest pre-telescopic astronomer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uraniborg</span> Astronomical observatory in Sweden

Uraniborg was an astronomical observatory and alchemy laboratory established and operated by the Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe. It was the first custom-built observatory in modern Europe, and the last to be built without a telescope as its primary instrument.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heliocentrism</span> Sun-centered astronomical model

Heliocentrism is a superseded astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun at the center of the universe. Historically, heliocentrism was opposed to geocentrism, which placed the Earth at the center. The notion that the Earth revolves around the Sun had been proposed as early as the third century BC by Aristarchus of Samos, who had been influenced by a concept presented by Philolaus of Croton. In the 5th century BC the Greek Philosophers Philolaus and Hicetas had the thought on different occasions that the Earth was spherical and revolving around a "mystical" central fire, and that this fire regulated the universe. In medieval Europe, however, Aristarchus' heliocentrism attracted little attention—possibly because of the loss of scientific works of the Hellenistic period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tychonic system</span> Model of the Solar System proposed in 1588 by Tycho Brahe

The Tychonic system is a model of the universe published by Tycho Brahe in 1588, which combines what he saw as the mathematical benefits of the Copernican system with the philosophical and "physical" benefits of the Ptolemaic system. The model may have been inspired by Valentin Naboth and Paul Wittich, a Silesian mathematician and astronomer. A similar cosmological model was independently proposed in the Hindu astronomical treatise Tantrasamgraha by Nilakantha Somayaji of the Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Celestial spheres</span> Elements of some cosmological models

The celestial spheres, or celestial orbs, were the fundamental entities of the cosmological models developed by Plato, Eudoxus, Aristotle, Ptolemy, Copernicus, and others. In these celestial models, the apparent motions of the fixed stars and planets are accounted for by treating them as embedded in rotating spheres made of an aetherial, transparent fifth element (quintessence), like gems set in orbs. Since it was believed that the fixed stars did not change their positions relative to one another, it was argued that they must be on the surface of a single starry sphere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christen Sørensen Longomontanus</span> Danish astronomer

Christen Sørensen Longomontanus was a Danish astronomer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constantinople observatory of Taqi ad-Din</span> Medieval astronomical observatory

The Constantinople observatory of Taqi ad-Din, founded in Constantinople by Taqi ad-Din Muhammad ibn Ma'ruf in 1577, was one of the largest astronomical observatories in the pre-modern world. However, it only existed for a few years and was destroyed in 1580.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abul Fazl</span> Grand vizier of Mughal emperor Akbar from 1579 to 1602

Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak, also known as Abul Fazl, Abu'l Fadl and Abu'l-Fadl 'Allami, was an Indian writer, historian, and politician who served as the grand vizier of the Mughal Empire from his appointment in 1579, until his death in 1602. His notable works include the Akbarnama, Ain-i-Akbari, and a Persian translation of the Bible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Maestlin</span> German astronomer and mathematician (1550–1631)

Michael Maestlin was a German astronomer and mathematician, known for being the mentor of Johannes Kepler. He was a student of Philipp Apian and was known as the teacher who most influenced Kepler. Maestlin was considered to be one of the most significant astronomers between the time of Copernicus and Kepler.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copernican Revolution</span> 16th to 17th century intellectual revolution

The Copernican Revolution was the paradigm shift from the Ptolemaic model of the heavens, which described the cosmos as having Earth stationary at the center of the universe, to the heliocentric model with the Sun at the center of the Solar System. This revolution consisted of two phases; the first being extremely mathematical in nature and the second phase starting in 1610 with the publication of a pamphlet by Galileo. Beginning with the 1543 publication of Nicolaus Copernicus’s De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, contributions to the “revolution” continued until finally ending with Isaac Newton’s work over a century later.

<i>Mysterium Cosmographicum</i> Astronomy book by Johannes Kepler

Mysterium Cosmographicum is an astronomy book by the German astronomer Johannes Kepler, published at Tübingen in late 1596 and in a second edition in 1621. Kepler proposed that the distance relationships between the six planets known at that time could be understood in terms of the five Platonic solids, enclosed within a sphere that represented the orbit of Saturn.

<i>Rudolphine Tables</i> 1627 catalogue of astronomical data by Johannes Kepler

The Rudolphine Tables consist of a star catalogue and planetary tables published by Johannes Kepler in 1627, using observational data collected by Tycho Brahe (1546–1601). The tables are named in memory of Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor, in whose employ Brahe and Kepler had begun work on the tables. The main purpose of the Rudolphine tables was to allow the computation of the positions of the then known planets of the Solar System, and they were considerably more precise than earlier such tables.

Hans Georg Herwart von Hohenburg was a Bavarian statesman and scholar, and a patron and correspondent of Johannes Kepler.

Helisaeus Roeslin or Helisäus Röslin was a German physician and astrologer who adopted a geoheliocentric model of the universe. Roeslin attended the University of Tübingen in order to become a physician. After becoming a physician Roeslin became very interested in astrology as well as predicting when the second coming of Christ would occur. He was one of five observers who concluded that the Great Comet of 1577 was located beyond the Moon. His representation of the comet, described as "an interesting, though crude, attempt," was among the earliest and was highly complex. Roeslin also came to the conclusion independently that it was the Sun not the Earth that was center of the Solar System. Today Helisaeus Roeslin is best remembered for his controversies and involvement with geo-heliocentric world systems and for writing books about astronomy. Some of his works consist of a Ratio Studiorum et operum, the Tabella, and De opere Dei creationis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cornelius Gemma</span> Dutch astronomer and astrologer (1535–1578)

CorneliusGemma was a Flemish physician, astronomer and astrologer, and the oldest son of cartographer and instrument-maker Gemma Frisius. He was a professor of medicine at the Catholic University of Leuven, and shared in his father's efforts to restore ancient Ptolemaic practice to astrology, drawing on the Tetrabiblos.

John Craig was a Scottish physician and astronomer. He was physician to King James. He corresponded with Tycho Brahe, and associated with John Napier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Observational history of comets</span>

Comets have been observed by humanity for thousands of years, but only in the past few centuries have they been studied as astronomical phenomena. Before modern times, great comets caused worldwide fear, considered bad omens foreboding disaster and turmoil, for example the 1066 passage of Halley's Comet depicted as heralding the Norman conquest of England. As the science of astronomy developed planetary theories, understanding the nature and composition of comets became a challenging mystery and a large area of study.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. Doris Hellman</span> American historian of science (1910–1973)

Clarisse Doris Hellman Pepper was an American historian of science, "one of the first professional historians of science in the United States". She specialized in 16th- and 17th-century astronomy, wrote a book on the Great Comet of 1577, and was the translator of another book, a biography of Johannes Kepler. She became a professor at the Pratt Institute and later at the Queens College, City University of New York, and was recognized by membership in several selective academic societies.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.